ArticlePDF Available

Rurality as Concordance: Mental Health Service Delivery for Rural Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence



This manuscript examines how a shared sociospatial or “rural” identity may uniquely facilitate mental health care delivery. In particular, we consider the significant but largely unexplored role that domestic violence center staff, whom we term “Reputational Provider-Experts” or RPEs, play in addressing the mental health needs of rural women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Using data collected through semi-structured individual and focus group interviews with RPEs across 12 counties and four tribal reservations in northern Wisconsin ( N = 15), we detail the sociospatial commonalities that enable RPEs to provide trusted, sustained mental health support to rural women. Because these advocates are rural community members whose approach implicitly appeals to local norms and values, we argue that they represent rurally concordant providers. In this way, rurality emerges as a meaningful and novel form of patient-provider concordance, one with critical relevance to addressing the rural mental health crisis in the United States.
Sociological Perspectives
1 –21
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
DOI: 10.1177/07311214211019078
Rurality as Concordance:
Mental Health Service Delivery
for Rural Survivors of Intimate
Partner Violence
Michele Statz1, Katie R. Billings2, and Jordan Wolf1
This manuscript examines how a shared sociospatial or “rural” identity may uniquely facilitate
mental health care delivery. In particular, we consider the significant but largely unexplored role
that domestic violence center staff, whom we term “Reputational Provider-Experts” or RPEs,
play in addressing the mental health needs of rural women who have experienced intimate
partner violence. Using data collected through semi-structured individual and focus group
interviews with RPEs across 12 counties and four tribal reservations in northern Wisconsin
(N = 15), we detail the sociospatial commonalities that enable RPEs to provide trusted, sustained
mental health support to rural women. Because these advocates are rural community members
whose approach implicitly appeals to local norms and values, we argue that they represent
rurally concordant providers. In this way, rurality emerges as a meaningful and novel form of
patient-provider concordance, one with critical relevance to addressing the rural mental health
crisis in the United States.
rural studies, mental health, culture, inequality
Like many rural regions in the United States, rural northern Wisconsin communities suffer from
limited, and in some areas, nonexistent, mental health and health care services (Hastings and
Cohn 2013). Amid population declines, state and federal spending cuts, and the growth of high-
deductible health plans, rural areas additionally contend with decreasing numbers of mental
health providers and physicians as well as a diminished property tax base—that is, the primary
means by which many rural counties finance health and mental health care (Vogenberg and
Santilli 2018).
The pervasive poverty experienced by rural regions often prevents access to quality care and
in some cases prompts cuts to already insufficient services (Hoeft et al. 2018). This same socio-
economic distress is correlated with the prevalence of mental health problems (Evans 2016;
Hudson 2005), which promotes a vicious cycle in which rural Americans’ need to access mental
1University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, MN, USA
2University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Corresponding Author:
Katie R. Billings, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
1019078SPXXXX10.1177/07311214211019078Sociological PerspectivesStatz et al.
2 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
health care rises as their ability to access that care declines. Indeed, in response to a recent, open-
ended survey about the general needs of their communities, fully one quarter of low-income
northern Wisconsin respondents identified access to mental health services as a critical and
unmet need (Wolf and Statz 2018).
In addition to the structural and behavior contours of the rural mental health crisis, relatively
less attention has been paid to the sociocultural processes that underlie rural barriers to mental
health care. While physical access to mental health care cannot be understated, more subtle bar-
riers, among them shared norms and attitudes, may prevent rural individuals from seeking care
or from reaping the maximum benefits of their care—even when health services are made avail-
able (Hartley 2004; Robinson et al. 2012). To improve both access to and quality of mental health
care in rural settings, social scientists and medical professionals must develop a more granular
understanding of how rurality relates to mental health care and how this relationship can inform
culturally appropriate mental health care provision. After all, and as we argue here, it is precisely
relationship—in this case between respected and local mental health care providers and potential
patients—that bridges the rural mental health care gap.
Concordance in Patient-provider Relationships
In this manuscript, we frame empirical research on rural mental health provision in the context of
intimate partner violence (IPV) through the lenses of concordance and cultural capital. By draw-
ing on the concordance literature’s attention to shared experiences, values, and communication,
and likewise underscoring the social class aspects of cultural capital, we integrate these frame-
works to demonstrate the critical relevance of sociospatial identity as an axis of concordance in
rural patient-provider relationships. This is a meaningful intervention in the literature, and one
with particular salience to mental health provision.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that patients’ and providers’ demographic attributes
determine patients’ access to and satisfaction with their health care. One vein of literature, namely
that on concordance, has examined patients’ and providers’ attributes with relation to one
another—that is, whether or not their attributes match—and how these concordant or discordant
relationships affect health care provision and outcomes. Here, “concordance” is defined as a
shared demographic attribute between the patient and provider, such as gender, race, or language.
Conversely, “discordance” is when these demographic attributes between patients and their pro-
viders are at odds. Although the relationship between gender concordance and health outcomes
remains largely ambiguous (Jerant et al. 2011), researchers have demonstrated that other forms
of concordance are strongly and consistently related to better health care experiences and health
Among these, racial concordance has been the most widely investigated form of relational
concordance in the health care setting. Lisa A. Cooper et al. (2003) find that in racially concor-
dant patient-physician relationships, patients use more services, are more satisfied with those
services, and rate their physicians as more participatory than patients in racially discordant rela-
tionships. While some studies challenge the effect of patient-provider racial concordance on
health outcomes (see Meghani et al. 2009), patients’ subjective ratings of their experiences,
health-related outcomes, and willingness to use health services prove consistently related to
racial concordance (LaVeist and Nuru-Jeter 2002; Okunrintemi et al. 2018). As specifically per-
tains to mental health, others demonstrate racially concordant patients’ increased likelihood of
continuing their mental health care (Alegría et al. 2013) and patients’ preferences for mental
health providers of their own racial identity (Cabral and Smith 2011).
In the health care setting, language concordance is also documented as leading to better health
outcomes, better health care provision, and higher satisfaction with providers (Ali and Watson
Statz et al. 3
2018). While some argue that the effects of racial concordance can be explained by language
concordance (August et al. 2011)—that is, the ability of the patient and provider to speak the
same language proficiently—still others find separate effects for racial and language concor-
dance (Cooper and Powe 2004; Traylor et al. 2010).
The relevance of racial and language concordance to health care outcomes points to a signifi-
cant reality: the perceived similarity between a patient and provider in terms of culture, beliefs,
values, and communication matters. As our and others’ work demonstrates, these shared attri-
butes are worth considering further. For instance, Richard L. Street et al. (2008) examine the
relationship between racial concordance and patient outcomes by measuring two dimensions of
similarity: personal (defined by beliefs and values) and ethnic (defined by race and community).
Measures of personal, but not ethnic, similarity predicted patients’ trust, satisfaction with care
and intent to adhere to the providers’ recommendations. These findings suggest that personal
similarity (beliefs and values) may be the mechanism through which patient-provider concor-
dance along various demographic characteristics leads to better health care experiences and
health outcomes. Other work similarly evidences that general perceptions of similarity along the
lines of communication, beliefs, and values are related to patients’ reported amount of trust in
their providers—a measure strongly associated with positive health outcomes (Street et al. 2009;
Thom, Hall, and Pawlson 2004).
Concordance and Social Class
Although “social class” has yet to be theoretically labeled as an axis of concordance in patient-
provider relationships, the impacts of social class discordance are widely evident. Research on
the effects of discordant social class relationships in the health care setting has framed class
largely as differences in cultural capital—namely the interaction styles, dispositions, beliefs,
and skills that individuals bring into interactions—and has explained the process through
which cultural capital reproduces class-based health inequalities. For instance, Annette Lareau
(2003) demonstrates that while middle-class children are taught to advocate for their health
care needs and view their doctor as a resource and ally, working-class children are largely
coached to mistrust their doctors, view doctors as potentially judgmental authority figures, and
in some cases restrict the amount of information they share or even lie about health behaviors.
As a result, doctors are often able to provide more comprehensive and accurate health informa-
tion to middle-class families. Janet K. Shim (2010) likewise argues that individuals from
higher social class backgrounds, and therefore those with more cultural capital, are better
equipped to build rapport with health providers because they share similarly-classed interactional
styles and experiences.
Cecilia L. Ridgeway and Susan R. Fisk (2012) further theorize class discordant interactions as
“gateway interactions”—cross-class communications that are especially crucial for poor and
working-class individuals to navigate for the sake of health and social mobility. Other examples
include college interviews, job interviews, and appointments with lawyers, interactions in which
“success” largely hinges on an individual’s ability to match the disposition, preferences, and
interactional styles of the other party. As they pertain to this particular research, these cultural
capital studies demonstrate that social class discordance in interpersonal interactions—including
those in health care settings—perpetuates social class (and by extension, health) disparities.
Of course in some settings, we can arguably capitalize on this information, demonstrating the
profound potential of health care interactions that involve and reflect shared social norms, spatial
experiences, and class identities. In what follows, we integrate and extend existing attention to
racial, linguistic, and class concordance to a meaningful recognition of space. Specifically, we
highlight rurality as an important axis of concordance/discordance and explain how this concep-
tualization can help us better understand and address the rural mental health crisis.
4 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
The Present Study
In the United States, “rural” is variously classified in terms of population size and geographic
isolation, through economy or policy-relevance typologies such as “low education” or “persistent
poverty” (ERS 2015), and even as “what is not urban” by the U.S. Census Bureau (Ratcliff et al.
2016). Of particular relevance to this manuscript, a number of scholars have centered on socio-
spatial aspects of “rurality,” including rural residents’ attachment to local community and kin
networks, rural place, and the lifestyle it represents (Boglioli 2009; Struthers and Bokemeier
2000); a high density of acquaintanceship (Freudenburg 1986); and an assumption of shared
values, including self-reliance (Barcus and Brunn 2010; Lobao 2006; Sherman 2009).
Rural U.S. communities also tend to have substandard infrastructure and human capital defi-
cits, with once secure agricultural and extractive industries increasingly replaced by manufactur-
ing and service jobs—many of which are low-wage and non-unionized (Merrett and Struthers
2002). Owing to this economic restructuring, a prevailing characteristic of much of rural America
is increasing poverty, including working poverty (Anglin 2002; Smith and Tickamyer 2011;
Thiede, Lichter, and Slack 2018)—even as rural areas have consistently had higher rates of pov-
erty than metropolitan areas since the 1960s (Farrigan 2014). Of course, this economic trend also
reflects broader historical and political factors, among them the cumulative and cross-genera-
tional impacts of structural violence experienced by rural Native communities and people of
color (Kirmayer, Gone, and Moses 2014).
With full acknowledgment of the complex diversity in and across rural communities in the
United States, we propose that the aforementioned sociospatial and economic aspects of rurality
may uniquely impact how rural individuals think about and interact with the mental health care
system. Drawing on Ann R. Tickamyer and Debra A. Henderson’s (2003) attention to the “deep-
seated local affiliations and loyalties” of rural women in the United States (p. 112; see also
Walker and Logan 2018), we recognize that a shared, lived experience of place—the “local affili-
ation” and all it signifies—is likely significant for establishing rapport between rural patients and
their rural mental health providers. Moreover, and as we already know, this perceived similarity
between the patient and health care provider leads to positive health care experiences and out-
comes (Street et al. 2009).
As we demonstrate below, “rurality” proves a multifaceted identity, one that includes, miti-
gates, and at times exceeds other forms of concordance/discordance between patients and provid-
ers. In what follows, we argue for rurality as an important axis of concordance by documenting
rurally concordant mental health care relationships and considering how their concordance
relates to rural individuals’ orientations toward and experiences of mental health care.
Data and Methods
IPV in Context
This study explores the lived experiences of individuals who provide mental health services to
rural female survivors of IPV. This addresses a critical gap in the literature, for while research has
examined the role of mental health providers in responding to IPV (Chapman and Monk 2015;
Trevillion et al. 2016), its inverse—namely how or if domestic violence advocates address men-
tal health needs—remains largely unexplored.
While used interchangeably with “domestic violence” by our respondents, we primarily uti-
lize the term “IPV” in this manuscript. We understand IPV as relationship abuse that includes
physical and sexual abuse, psychological harm, and stalking by a current or former partner
(Breiding, Chen, and Black 2014). With full acknowledgment that both women and men are
victimized by IPV, we center here on the experiences of rural women. We do so because women
Statz et al. 5
are at a greater risk than men of repeated abuse, severe physical and sexual violence, and vio-
lence that occurs in the context of controlling behaviors (Karakurt, Smith, and Whiting 2014).
Research also suggests that rural women may experience a higher frequency of psychological
and physical abuse, alongside a decreased likelihood of help-seeking, compared with their urban
counterparts (Krishnan, Hilbert, and VanLeeuwen 2001; Peek-Asa et al. 2011; Shannon et al.
2006). Moreover, rural perpetrators of domestic violence are nearly twice as likely as urban per-
petrators to inflict severe physical injuries and are more likely to use a weapon during their
assault (Logan, Shannon, and Walker 2005; Pruitt 2008), and rural female victims of domestic
violence are more likely to be married to the batterer; to experience sexual assault in domestic
violence incidents; and to be victims of childhood abuse than their urban counterparts (Logan et
al. 2005; Pruitt 2008; Rennison, DeKeseredy, and Dragiewicz 2012).
The mental health consequences of IPV on women include an increased likelihood of clinical
depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, low self-esteem, and self-
harm (Banyard et al. 2018; Humphreys and Thiara 2003). These consequences are arguably com-
pounded in a rural setting, where women additionally experience physical and social isolation,
scarce or distanced health care and advocacy services, the stigma attached to being a victim of
domestic violence, and, relatedly, the lack of anonymity that is characteristic of small towns and
often deters individuals from reporting rape or intimate abuse (Feyen 2001; Gallup-Black 2004;
Statz and Pruitt 2019).
Rural IPV and Mental Health Service Delivery Systems
In the United States, including northern Wisconsin, IPV and mental health service delivery
systems share an important characteristic: a structural shift toward the centralization and
regionalization of services (Ostermann and Vincent 2019). In the mental health context, eco-
nomic constraints as well as a shortage of mental health care professionals (de Vogel 2018;
Linnane 2017) has accelerated the centralization of mental health services to urban centers. As
a result, 87 percent of Mental Health Professional Area Shortages are in rural areas (Bird,
Dempsey, and Hartley 2001). This trend has left northern Wisconsin, like many other rural
regions, with limited or nonexistent mental health services (Hastings and Cohn 2013). As men-
tal health service delivery becomes both literally and figuratively distant, unfamiliar, and tai-
lored for urban residents (Blank et al. 1995), rural community members are further alienated
from critically needed care.
The philosophy and practice of IPV service delivery combats some of the negative repercus-
sions of this shift toward urbanization (Kulkarni, Bell, and Rhodes 2012). As our data demon-
strate, IPV centers tend to emphasize holistic, personalized, and community-based care. These
values are reflected in their differential staffing compared with the mental health service delivery
system. Although some of the IPV centers we researched are considered “regional” in terms of
their designated service areas, the centers themselves are staffed by rural community members
who live within the given service area. Moreover, IPV system staff often practice in a relatively
informal capacity, while those in the mental health delivery system tend to be formally trained
and educated. In this way, the IPV service delivery system remains local and more familiar to the
rural women who utilize it when compared with the mental health delivery system, despite eco-
nomic and legislative urges toward centralization in both sectors.
This paper does not offer an in-depth comparison of these two systems. Rather, our aim is to
highlight elements within the IPV service delivery system that effectively address the mental
health needs of rural IPV survivors—in this case, de-centralized, community-based care (Ala-
Nikkola et al. 2018; World Health Organization 2003). Our hope is that these elements might
serve as important guideposts for mental health service delivery in rural regions more broadly.
6 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
Sample, Data Collection, and Analysis
Using data collected by Michele Statz and Jordan Wolf, we identified local domestic violence
center staff and directors across Northern Wisconsin (N = 15) as a critically trusted, if not exclu-
sive, source of mental health care provision. In fact, in a survey of low-income residents in
Northern Wisconsin, residents most often reported that domestic violence center staff and direc-
tors were sources of mental health care in their communities (Wolf and Statz 2018). Borrowing
from the sociological literature on “reputational leaders” (Gunn, Brooks, and Vigar 2015;
Shoemaker and Nix 1972), we term these individuals “Reputational Provider-Experts” (short-
ened to “RPEs” throughout): informal mental health advocates who have high visibility in the
community, are active and influential participants in local networks, and are viewed by others as
trustworthy and knowledgeable.1
The majority of these organizations provide shelter, food, and clothing to victims of IPV, and
most also offer some counseling, support groups, and advocacy. In the spirit of the breadth of
these services—and the expansiveness of staff efforts—we generally refer to these agencies as
“centers” rather than “shelters.” To protect participant anonymity and confidentiality in the
reporting of results, we here utilize pseudonyms. Likewise, in acknowledgment that many
domestic violence centers do not publicly disclose location to protect residents and staff, we
deliberately locate respondents and facilities within the more generalized “a northern Wisconsin
county” or “a northern Wisconsin tribal community” throughout this manuscript.
Between January and March of 2018, we conducted one-on-one, semi-structured interviews
with personnel (N = 8) at eight domestic violence centers that cover 12 counties and four tribal
reservations within northern Wisconsin and one focus group interview with domestic violence
center staff (N = 7) at a tribal reservation in the region. While our sample is small according to
disciplinary standards, the total population of domestic violence center personnel in the study
region is also small: there are 16 total domestic violence shelter organizations within rural-desig-
nated northern Wisconsin counties (WCASA 2020). Consequently, a sample of 15 is a much
larger proportion of the entire target population than is often possible. We contacted all 16 rural
domestic violence shelter organizations and eight either declined to participate or did not follow
up. Of the eight centers that agreed to participate, all shelter personnel consented to be inter-
viewed. All respondents self-identified as female. The majority of the RPEs have lived in north-
ern Wisconsin for most of their lives (80 percent [12 out of 15]), and 20 percent (3 out of 15)
openly self-identify as survivors of IPV. Most have held their current positions for over 10 years.
Fourteen of the 15 individuals we interviewed do not have advanced or clinical training in a
mental health-related field but spoke openly about being locally known and utilized as ad hoc
mental health providers for victims of IPV: “Each county has mental health resources in the way
of a crisis line through the county,” noted one RPE. “You might be able to at least call and talk to
a social worker. But [the social worker is] going to end up referring them to my office.” RPEs
variously described their efforts as including “brief therapy,” prevention work, one-on-one coun-
seling, case management, advocacy, and support groups. Many of the RPEs we interviewed work
on behalf of survivors from geographically but also socially isolated communities in northern
Wisconsin, including undocumented im/migrants and the Amish.
Participants were recruited through word of mouth via networks established in the course of
the broader research project. An ongoing collaborative partnership with a legal aid organization
in the region introduced us to the directors of three centers. These individuals in turn introduced
us and our study to personnel at other shelter facilities across the region, all of whom agreed to
participate in telephonic, one-on-one, interviews. One individual additionally invited us to con-
duct a focus group interview with center staff at a tribal reservation. All informants provided
written consent, and the institutional review board at the University of Minnesota approved the
study protocol.
Statz et al. 7
Jordan Wolf conducted all telephonic interviews, and Michele Statz conducted the focus
group interview. Individual and focus group interviews were semi-structured using the same
interview guide. The flexible nature of these methods allowed respondents to determine which
topics they found most important. RPEs were asked about their roles in their communities, the
unique health needs of their rural residents, and the barriers and facilitators to mental health care
that locals experience in their communities (see interview guide in Appendix). This manuscript
accordingly highlights the primary issues and themes that emerged in the course of these
interviews about providing mental health care for IPV in rural contexts.
Data analysis was led by Michele Statz and Jordan Wolf. Each interview was audio-recorded
and transcribed verbatim by a research assistant, then uploaded to NVivo software for data man-
agement. Data were analyzed via a grounded theory approach that integrated theoretically
informed questions and ongoing, collaborative interpretation to identify key themes (Glaser and
Strauss 1967). We integrated this approach with abductive theory, a more contemporary inferen-
tial process aimed at producing new hypotheses and theories by holding surprising research
evidence against the backdrop of diverse literatures (Timmermans and Tavory 2012).
Michele Statz and Jordan Wolf independently engaged in line-by-line coding, attaching
descriptive codes relevant to central research questions throughout (Thornberg and Charmaz
2014). We then did a second round of coding to collaboratively identify and discuss emergent
themes. During this process, Michele Statz reviewed these themes and any unexpected data with
relevant research participants for clarification, validation, and additional perspective (Baxter and
Jack 2008). Since themes were consistent across the two types of interviews, we analyzed the
data in tandem but were cognizant of the different methodologies and how they may affect the
data we collected throughout the coding and analysis process. Accordingly, check-in conversa-
tions were frequently held to make sure we similarly defined themes and evidence supporting
them, and likewise to explore our own positionality and potential biases in regard to the data. In
collaboration with Katie R. Billings, analysis then proceeded to an interpretive phrase in which
text, codes, and themes were organized in an explanatory framework that foregrounded female
participants’ points of view.
Two prominent themes emerged in our analysis of interview data. The first encompasses the
structural, spatial, and social barriers to mental health provision in northern Wisconsin. The sec-
ond identifies what is working in spite of, and at times because of, these barriers, namely a con-
certed appeal to local norms and values by RPEs. Consequently, in the first half of our results
section, we discuss how rurality uniquely affects female IPV survivors’ experiences of mental
health care in northern Wisconsin. These results demonstrate the importance of rurality in deter-
mining both access to and orientations toward mental health care. In the second half, we show
how domestic violence center staff are key, albeit ad hoc, providers of mental health services to
women experiencing IPV—as well as under- or unrecognized authorities in mitigating the social
and emotional impacts of domestic violence. We draw on these advocates’ perspectives as experts
in understanding disparities in mental health care and as guides in identifying spatially and
culturally relevant interventions (see also McNichols, Witt, and Gatewood 2016).
We argue that because these advocates are rural community members who appeal to rural
norms and values, they represent rurally concordant providers who are uniquely situated to pro-
vide mental health care to rural community members. This is evidenced in RPEs’ awareness of
and sensitivity to clients’ experiences; their holistic approach to mental health needs and service
provision; their visible presence and partnerships in the community; and their commitment to
work beyond the bounds of job titles or descriptions. To that end, we conclude the paper with a
discussion of the role these informal “Reputational Provider-Experts” and how their position as
8 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
rurally concordant mental health care providers might help identify meaningful interventions on
a larger scale.
Structural Barriers
RPEs noted numerous structural barriers that prevent or hinder women’s ability to access mental
health resources. One RPE explained,
[Victims of IPV] have to jump through a bunch of hoops. There are always hoops . . . If you are
fleeing for your life, and you are leaving a rural community where you were isolated to begin with,
imagine how hard it is . . . You have to get back on your feet financially, then try to find low-income
housing that doesn’t exist.
Relying heavily on state and federal grants, as well as in many cases tribal governments, RPEs
steadily underscored the strains they felt were unique to Wisconsin. “We are right on the border
of Michigan,” said one RPE.
The resources that are available to DV clients and families are very short in Wisconsin. I’ve had
clients I’ve had to transfer over to Michigan because there are just more resources available. There’s
more financial assistance, there’s more housing opportunities . . . Wisconsin is lacking.
An advocate in northwestern Wisconsin similarly described clients’ general preference for ser-
vices “across the bridge” in Minnesota.
Mental health resources are similarly lacking—both a dearth of resources and overburdened
mental health professionals prevent rural community members from receiving mental health
care. One RPE explained,
We would love to be able to refer our clients to professional therapists or counselors . . . [But] there
is always surprise to people who aren’t from around here originally [when they] find out how hard it
is to try and get in to see a therapist.
Overall, RPEs noted the structural limitations of living in rural Wisconsin that prevented many
women from seeking and/or receiving needed services, and even led some to seek services out of
Spatial Barriers
Our interviewees’ noted spatial limitations by discussing distance from resources and transporta-
tion as foremost concerns for victims of IPV in northern Wisconsin. RPEs shared that most of the
individuals they work with travel anywhere from 5 to 40 miles to access jobs, childcare, shop-
ping, and health and social services. This travel time is often compounded by inclement weather,
particularly during the long winter months. Moreover, many of these clients are low-income.
Because of the limited employment, childcare, affordable housing, and educational opportunities
characteristic of rural space, the RPEs noted that victims of IPV are often financially dependent
on an abusive partner. “The lesser of two evils, I’ve heard them say, is to stay in the violent or
abusive situation,” stated one RPE. “At least they have a roof over their head and they’re with
their children.” Further impacts of rural poverty, like limited or unreliable transportation, mean
that “those outside supports . . . are so far away,” noted another RPE.
I think that probably the biggest challenge is transportation and trying to figure out how we can get
these women [places]. They have to take more than one step. You can’t just get in your car and go to
the doctor.
Statz et al. 9
An additional dimension of spatial barriers is communication. “We have a lot of the issues big
cities have, but we don’t have the resources for our people like they have. Transportation.
Housing. Basic things,” noted one respondent during the focus group interview.
“Communication,” added her colleague. “Cell phones, telephone, computers, internet.”
During a later interview, another RPE similarly commented, “[T]he people who live in rural
areas cannot afford internet. Cell phones don’t even work in some of these heavily wooded areas,
or there isn’t a tower nearby. They have a hard time reaching out for help.”
Social Barriers
Along with structural and spatial barriers, RPEs noted that stigma was a primary reason that
potential clients are reluctant or choose not to get help. “We are taking two things that society
really stigmatizes, right?” said one RPE. She continued,
Domestic violence, what did you do to deserve that? Why didn’t you leave that relationship? . . . And
also, “the new shame”: people don’t talk about their mental health issues. This is not something
people feel comfortable sharing with other people: “I’m having anxiety when I’m by myself.” “I
can’t sleep.” Or, “These symptoms came about as the domestic violence issue occurred.” It makes
people feel really isolated.
Another RPE echoed this sentiment by stating,
Sad to say, but still within rural communities and way back when, it’s just something you deal with
at home, and you make it through. A lot of people are still not wanting to expose what happens behind
closed doors.
RPEs stressed that social factors—primarily stigma—prevent rural women from seeking needed
RPEs’ Personalized Care Strategies
Despite the previous barriers to care, RPEs note that much is working in terms of providing men-
tal health care to rural community members. As we demonstrate here, RPEs’ position as trusted
local community members allows them a unique ability to provide mental health support to
women escaping IPV. Below, we consider the elements of their unique position—their informal-
ity, familiarity, trust, and appeals to local norms—that they cite as important facilitators to mental
health care in rural northern Wisconsin. Throughout, we evidence these factors as critical dimen-
sions of concordance. Overwhelmingly, RPEs stressed trust—and with it, choice and comfort—
as critical to mental health service delivery in rural Wisconsin. These needs were often couched
within a broader ethic of informality and self-sufficiency. RPEs commonly mentioned self-
sufficiency as a powerful local norm impacting an individual’s ability or willingness to seek out
help. By comparing the center to other resources, one RPE explained, “There are always hoops
victims have to jump through to get these resources. When they come to agencies like ours, this
is the only place where we aren’t going to tell them what to do.” The organizational reputation
she highlighted matters, as do individual RPE reputations as open-minded, culturally sensitive,
and deferential to clients’ decisions. As another RPE reiterated, “We really try to give [clients] a
lot of choices.” RPEs appealed to local norms of self-sufficiency to promote trust and confidence
in their services.
Other RPEs underscored how access to mental health care is not only shaped by a dearth of
providers, as noted previously, but also by a mistrust of elite or unfamiliar mental health
10 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
providers more generally. In many ways, this hints at the concordance work at the interstices of
language and class. “We do have community mental health [here],” stated an RPE, “but [our
clients] will shut down on you.” Similarly, another RPE added,
[Clients] are really connected to [the center] and don’t often seek out mental health services. It is just
easier to get those services from one site instead of having to re-explain what happened to them, what
situation led to the mental health issues . . . I get that. Having to tell another person your story, they
could tell their story 5, 6, 7 times in a row. That’s retraumatizing them. Places like [the center] are
having to work outside of their scope because that person is only comfortable working in their setting
with their staff.
As RPEs explained, the comfort and necessitated informality of IPV centers uniquely appeal to
rural victims of domestic violence with mental health needs. So too does the extensive local
knowledge and connectedness these RPEs offer.
RPEs and the Community
Throughout our research, RPEs underscored that meaningfully addressing IPV hinges on devel-
oping longstanding, trusted relationships with clients and with area stakeholders. Both sets of
relationships arguably rely and capitalize on RPEs’ reputations, and in the region we studied, the
latter additionally reflects RPEs’ expertise around IPV and clients’ mental health needs. “We
were a big part of retraining officers, dispatch, the ER,” noted one RPE.
Because we heard from the people we serve: “I got retraumatized going to the ER, or having to fill
out the report with an officer . . .” We helped describe [to community partners] what services people
need for both mental health and for situations where they are victims of crime. We created this whole
new system of care.
RPEs discussed their efforts to forge connections with area churches, nursing homes, hospi-
tals, public health offices, school staff, student groups, local attorneys and judges, and even
employees at a local Walmart. Through these connections, RPEs persistently publicize center
resources, provide off-site support groups, and offer ongoing, largely informal public education
about the complex spatial, socioeconomic, and health realities of IPV. “We’ve worked with [the
employment agency],” stated one RPE.
I had a client who struggled with some mental health. And she was missing a lot of days at work.
They weren’t understanding it. I had to advocate for her to help them understand where she is coming
from. They have a better understanding, and they actually let her take some time off without
jeopardizing her job. [It] was great.
A key component of this community education is publicity around RPEs and the local DV
center itself. Although the location of DV centers is often not disclosed to protect victims of IPV
(Driskell 2009), RPEs were overwhelmingly deliberate in making their work visible. “We are on
the tribal listservs. We are on the tribal e-news. We are within the community, all the public facili-
ties,” stated one RPE. Another commented,
Every month we have an awareness campaign . . . We work [ourselves] into every possible gathering,
ceremony, community event that is held here . . . [Y]ou never know where you are going to be when
a victim is going to come forward. We are always there. We show up everywhere.
Statz et al. 11
RPEs expressed their commitment to educational efforts in the community to reduce stigma and
increase the likelihood that individuals seek their resources. One RPE explained this
We are out in the community a lot. We are talking to people who may never, ever, ever need our
services . . . It’s a lot of time for us to do. It takes us away from serving the people we serve. But for
this to change, you have to shift the paradigm and make [us] a part of people’s everyday lives.
Holistic Approach to Service Provision
As our data evidence, this local knowledge contributes to a critical understanding of clients’
complex socioeconomic needs, which in turn translates to a holistic and pragmatic approach to
individuals’ mental health with deep practice and policy relevance. “We really need to find ways
to address [other] issues before we can . . . help clients through their domestic or sexual assault
issues,” stated one RPE. “People need housing and food and shelter before they can function
properly. These are the other layers that need to be addressed to help them live a healthy and
violent-free life.”
In rural or remote northern Wisconsin, there is a sociospatial dimension to addressing these
“other layers,” one evidenced by the high frequency with which RPEs referred to DV centers as
“hubs.” Whether to address a client’s lack of transportation or distrust of area medical profession-
als, RPEs steadily underscored the need for in situ service provision. “She didn’t have to go on
the bus to a bunch of different places,” said one RPE of a client. “She was able to stay here and
have a staff work with her through it.”
We help them through the criminal justice system or legal system . . . We help with divorces, child
custody placement, restraining orders . . . We help them with accounting. Connecting them with
economic support. Jobs . . . Mental health, connecting them with AODA [Alcohol and Other Drug
Abuse] resources. We have a children’s program coordinator who works with children, works on
healthy parenting. Safety. Family dynamics. So, when we work with clients, it’s a very holistic view.
It’s all aspects of their life we are looking at, not just the initial abuse.
Other RPEs additionally noted clients’ need for food share, BadgerCare Plus (state health care
coverage for low-income Wisconsin residents), and subsidized housing programs. In one tribal
community, naming ceremonies, sweat lodge ceremonies, talking circles, and transportation to
attend a local powwow were also offered. “[We provide] anything that is focused on the culture,
and [clients] choose from it to help heal.” RPEs acknowledged that to improve clients’ mental
health, they needed to address all the needs clients’ have when they come to the center. “Sometimes
mental illness can be brought on by years of experiencing domestic abuse,” commented another
RPE. “We look at [all] angles of it. And we help in all aspects to see each client, what resources,
and what supportive services help them.”
Suffering from limited—and in some areas, nonexistent—formal health services, northern
Wisconsin largely reflects rural regions across the United States. Accordingly, we sought out
local and informal mental health providers to illuminate the unique needs of women who have
experienced IPV and how these needs are met despite the numerous barriers to mental health care
characteristic of rural space. Our work documents the complex and interrelated structural, spa-
tial, and social barriers to accessing mental health care in the context of IPV—as well as RPEs’
success in mitigating these barriers and providing survivors of IPV with needed mental health
12 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
resources. We argue that these RPEs represent rurally concordant mental health care providers,
which explains their public presence and remarkable longevity as trusted advocates in their com-
munities. As our data demonstrate, these individuals appeal to local norms and values and empha-
size their position as community members, which conveys similarity with the women for whom
they are providing care. As already established in the literature, this is key to successful concor-
dance. Most simply, RPEs’ informality, familiarity, and ability to appeal to local norms are con-
sistent with the needs and values of many rural women. We argue that it is precisely these factors,
and therefore their rural-concordance, that enables RPEs to successfully provide mental health
care to female survivors of IPV.
Structural, Spatial, and Social Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Care
In this section, we situate our specific findings about structural, spatial, and social barriers to
mental health care in the existing literature. As in many rural regions in the United States, com-
munities in northern Wisconsin suffer from fewer medical services—including mental health
services (Hastings and Cohn 2013; Statz and Termuhlen 2020). The reasons for this are often
financial: Insurers reimburse behavioral health services at a lower rate than other medical spe-
cialties, and for patients covered by Medicaid, the rate is typically even less. In Wisconsin, where
approximately 20 percent of residents have some form of Medicaid coverage, including the
state’s BadgerCare Plus program for low-income residents, government funds reimburse mental
health providers for about half their costs for seeing Medicaid patients (Linnane 2017). As a
result, some psychiatrists set a limit on how many Medicaid-enrolled patients they will accept,
and regional health systems are reluctant to expand the behavioral health services they offer. As
in other rural regions contending with this relative lack of resources and support, it is increas-
ingly difficult to recruit mental health providers to northern Wisconsin counties. An additional
challenge is that many mental health providers are trained at research universities in urban areas
and cannot necessarily anticipate the unique challenges of rural practice (de Vogel 2018).
Moreover, when outside providers relocate to rural spaces, research suggests that their identities
as outsiders hinders their effectiveness and has a negative impact on the providers’ mental health
(Chipp et al. 2011).
From a spatial perspective, RPEs noted that the women they work with experience significant
and even prohibitive travel burdens in accessing mental health care and other resources. This
owes to rural and remote locations, poor roads and infrastructure, and absent public transporta-
tion (DeKeseredy et al. 2016; Statz and Evers 2020). These results are consistent with what other
scholars have documented, namely that rural women not only experience higher rates of IPV and
a greater severity of physical abuse, but they also tend to live farther from available resources
(Peek-Asa et al. 2011; Tittman et al. 2016). Moreover, any supports that are available often span
a very large service area and are arguably less responsive and comprehensive (DeKeseredy and
Schwartz 2009). Accordingly, rural women experiencing IPV are almost twice as likely to be
turned away from services as their urban counterparts due to a lack of capacity (Peek-Asa et al.
2011). This highlights the critical consequences of another structural shift, namely the centraliza-
tion or regionalization of formal mental health care provision. While ostensibly implemented to
improve outcomes and reduce costs via increased volume, variety of cases, experience and effi-
ciency (Ostermann and Vincent 2019), centralizing mental health services in urban areas results
in a perception among rural community members of mental health care as “distant, unfamiliar,
and unacceptable” (Blank et al. 1995). Our data underscore this, while also suggesting that RPEs
might actually increase efficiency and improve mental health outcomes.
Because some of the IPV programs we researched are “regional” and not local, in that they
cover a relatively wide service area, our data importantly confront proponents of centralization but
also add important nuance to scholarly and policy support for de-centralized, community-based
Statz et al. 13
mental health service delivery (Ala-Nikkola et al. 2018; World Health Organization 2003). Most
simply, our data steadily point to the importance of individuals within systems who provide
concordant, locally accepted services.
The rural spatial context also introduces communication challenges, including limited cell
phone service and broadband access. Thus, with a dearth of mental health providers, precarious
funding, and limited mobility and technology, northern Wisconsin powerfully evidences the
complex infrastructural and digital divide that “rural” mental health provision often encom-
passes. As we demonstrate here, interventions in rural and remote areas must consider that even
basic modes of communication remain out of reach for many low-income and vulnerable resi-
dents—and often for mental health providers, as well.
Finally, social barriers to mental health access with particular salience to rural individuals
include the stigmatization of IPV and mental health (Colon-Gonzales et al. 2013). Our study is
no exception to this trend. RPEs often discussed the double stigmatization of IPV and mental
health. Previous scholars have noted that stigma and its attendant shame cause many individuals
to remain silent about domestic violence (Owen and Carrington 2015; Roush and Kurth 2016).
In a rural context that may exhibit a high degree of social acquaintanceship and distinct privacy
norms, this lack of confidentiality can further inhibit victims from seeking formal services—and
community members from intervening when abuse is suspected (DeKeseredy and Schwartz
2009; Miller, Clark, and Herman 2007).
RPEs’ Rurally Concordant Care Strategies
Our findings demonstrate that RPEs uniquely mitigate the above barriers and provide critically
concordant mental health assistance to rural women experiencing IPV. One key dimension of this
work is RPEs’ sensitivity to self-sufficiency as a powerful local norm impacting a rural individu-
al’s ability or willingness to seek out help. In a sense reflecting what others have documented of
rural and/or “frontier” cultures in the United States, namely a high moral value accorded indi-
vidualism and self-reliance (Judd et al. 2006; Sherman 2009), our research shows that rural
women’s desire for self-sufficiency may actually bolster treatment effectiveness provided by
RPEs in northern Wisconsin (see also Nelson 2005; Zhang et al. 2008) rather than inhibit treat-
ment-seeking behavior (Colon-Gonzalez et al. 2013).
Significantly, if not unexpectedly, the connection we observed between self-reliance and help-
seeking largely owes to the barriers described in the above section. In other words, the informal-
ity demanded by a resource-poor rural context may uniquely appeal to individuals who prioritize
self-sufficiency. This reality largely underscores both the necessity and the success of RPEs in
their work on behalf of IPV survivors. Contending with precarious funding, absent mental health
and health care professionals, and many of the same communication and transportation chal-
lenges their clients face (see Health Resources & Services Administration 2015), RPEs’ broad
and ultimately successful response to victims of IPV powerfully appeals to local norms.
While all but one of the individuals we interviewed lack advanced clinical training in a mental
health field, every RPE articulated a clear, practiced, and relatively consistent set of factors to
address the mental health needs of survivors of IPV in rural and remote communities. First, RPEs
identified informality as a unifying norm that appeals to rural individuals who prioritize flexibil-
ity and self-sufficiency. While this informality is arguably demanded in DV centers that lack
robust funding and clinically trained professionals, RPEs’ appeal to local norms also meaning-
fully communicates similarity with patients, the backbone of concordance. RPEs also highlighted
their own local reputations as trustworthy—and for some, as survivors of IPV—as highly valued
by rural victims of IPV. In this context, RPEs’ ability to connect with locals as locals themselves
proves critical to connecting with and providing rural women with mental health care.
14 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
A corollary finding is that in these rural and remote contexts, regard for a trained mental health
professional as an “elite” or “outsider” may inhibit an individual’s desire to seek out mental
health services. Indeed, previous research on concordance suggests that “mismatches” between
the patient and provider on relevant characteristics compromises the quality of care, likelihood to
seek treatment, and satisfaction with treatment (Alegría et al. 2013; Cooper et al. 2003;
Okunrintemi et al. 2018).
Expanding this emphasis on “local,” RPEs argued that meaningful mental health support must
be holistic and thereby address the complex needs individuals present including housing, food,
shelter, and culturally significant opportunities for healing. Significantly, RPEs actually endeav-
ored to meet these needs, typically through well-established networks and a deep commitment to
community education. A number of RPEs detailed mental health supports for Native IPV survi-
vors that incorporated traditional practices and values, and all described advocacy and publicity
efforts as extending across and beyond reservation boundaries.
An issue of special consideration in this research involves formal training. As described here,
many RPEs observed a distrust for “elite” mental health professionals, particularly those with no
connection to the community, among the women they served. This concern is evidenced else-
where in the literature, particularly as regards the worry that if a woman seeks formal mental
health services, this, rather than her partner’s violence, will be the subject of professional atten-
tion—especially in the context of child custody proceedings (Stanley and Penhale 1999).
Research also suggests that women who have experienced IPV fear being pathologized by a
medical model of mental health that simplifies complex relational experiences into a diagnosis,
and that views counseling as a sufficient response (Humphreys and Thiara 2003; Laing 2001).
The idea of a formal mental health professional as “an outsider” supports our argument that RPEs
are successful providers because they are spatially concordant with the population they serve. Put
simply, RPEs’ identities as local and informal community members allow them to better serve
local rural women.
Owing to their personal experience and social location, we argue that RPEs evidence rurally
concordant mental health provision. That written, at no point did any RPE—nor do we—deny the
critical importance of ongoing and advanced training in clinical mental health counseling or
clinical social work. Indeed, as Emily R. Dworkin et al. (2017) discuss, this training should be
understood as critical to strengthening the local service infrastructure. When viewed as such, we
believe RPEs could, and indeed, must, be better supported by Wisconsin’s degree-granting insti-
tutions via remote or hybrid program offerings. Already trusted and well-positioned to offer
survivors of IPV the diverse, holistic support they need, this training will enhance RPEs’ skillset
and may likewise lend legitimacy in the context of interprofessional collaboration. In this way,
resources should be funneled to those who are already concordant with rural community mem-
bers and therefore most likely to be successful in providing mental health care.
Relatedly, another important consideration this research raises is the deep dexterity and mul-
tidimensional expertise of RPEs. RPEs’ active knowledge of the complex needs and barriers that
low-income rural individuals navigate has relevance to a host of professional stakeholders.
Indeed, the suggestions RPEs offer in contending with—and also capitalizing on—the spatial,
economic, and societal realities unique to rural and remote northern regions are likely of value to
social service and health care organizations, educators, and local and state policy makers.
Moreover, RPEs effectively train, collaborate with, and mobilize a range of diverse community
members. This represents an additional dimension of expertise, one with particular salience to
efforts aimed at enhancing mental health interventions in rural areas via interprofessional and
intersectoral collaboration (see, e.g., Heath et al. 2014).
There are several limitations to study results. For one, our data were obtained from a limited
sample of participants, the majority of whom self-identify as Native American or Caucasian and
female, and all of whom voluntarily enrolled to participate. These RPEs work on behalf of an
ability-, ethnically-, and gender-diverse clientele, but their perspectives remain their own. We
Statz et al. 15
must additionally acknowledge that focus group participants in particular may not have shared
their full range of views owing to privacy concerns. Although we did not find different themes
across the two methodologies, namely individual and focus group interviews, the varying meth-
ods may have affected the data we collected. Another limitation is that our data were collected
from individuals spanning 14 counties and four federally recognized tribes in rural and remote
northern Wisconsin. IPV center staff elsewhere in this region—and in neighboring but arguably
better resourced states, like Minnesota—may have substantially different opinions, experiences,
and clientele than those we interviewed.
This leads us to a related limitation of this study, namely that we interviewed RPEs but not the
IPV survivors on whose behalf they worked. To support our claims about concordance and per-
ceived similarity between providers and patients, we would need to interview women receiving
services about their beliefs and experiences with RPEs and/or formal mental health care provid-
ers. An important direction for future research is to document the perspectives of these individu-
als, to more systematically assess the impacts of diverse identities on in/formal mental health
care experiences (Hack, Larrison, and Gone 2014), and to necessarily contextualize rural IPV
experiences and mental health help-seeking with intersectional factors such as addiction, age,
children and/or pregnancy, incarceration, and so on (Bailey and Daugherty 2007; Bennett and
O’Brien 2007; Edwards 2015; Teaster, Roberto, and Dugar 2006).
In addition to regional and relational variance, we were unable to determine whether RPEs
provide better mental health care than formal providers owing to the study’s limited sampling
method and qualitative design. A study that considered these factors in tandem, namely the view-
points and work of formal mental health providers and RPEs on behalf of rural survivors of IPV,
could compellingly illuminate ways in which RPEs can or should function as key intermediaries
between IPV survivors and mental health care. This would of course presume that so many of the
aforementioned structural, spatial, and social barriers, among them unemployment, precarious
state insurance policies, unreliable transportation, and stigma and shame, have been addressed.
Consequently, this methodological challenge underscores the broader argument this research
makes, namely that the holistic and context-comprehensive work of RPEs is necessitated in and
by a rural and remote context.
By establishing rurality as concordance, this study offers a meaningful theoretical interven-
tion with immediate applied relevance. Rather than comparatively evaluate prevailing IPV and
mental health service delivery structures or offer explicit recommendations to one or both con-
texts, this manuscript identifies an element of mental health care delivery in the IPV context,
namely RPEs, with value for scholars and policy makers seeking to address the rural mental
health crisis more generally. At once attending to and mitigating rural barriers to mental health
care, RPEs provide services in an informal, sustained, and community-specific manner—an
approach that synergistically lessens barriers and decreases stigma for rural IPV victims. As rural
and remote regions continue to contend with well-documented shortages of mental health profes-
sionals along with the additional sociospatial barriers presented by rural poverty, RPEs compel-
lingly introduce relevant and replicable ways to address the mental health consequences of IPV
across diverse rural regions.
Interview Guide
[Introduction to study and review of research protocols]
1. What are your perspectives on:
Connections between women’s mental health and domestic abuse?
Domestic abuse problems of rural women within your community?
16 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
Prevalent mental health problems of rural women within your community?
Resources and organizations focused on mental health and/or domestic abuse for
women within your community?
2. How have you seen trends in your work change over time—ages, families, number of
3. How does government funding influence your work?
a. Are you concerned about cuts to government services?
4. What are the major barriers to your clients toward seeking help?
5. How much do you think your geographical location has an impact on domestic
6. How do people get to your organization? How do they hear about you?
7. Comparatively, are there differences regarding your work, patient population, or access to
resources between WI and MN?2
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication
of this article.
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publica-
tion of this article: This research was funded by the National Science Foundation’s Law and Sciences
Program (award #1729117).
1. While we focus on informal mental health advocates here, it is important to underscore that we identify
these RPEs as but one subgroup of a larger network of informal experts. Consequently, the principles
we discuss regarding RPEs’ unique strengths in mental health service provision (in this case, for IPV
survivors) should be applied to other fields as well, including medical services, public health, educa-
tion, and welfare.
2. A number of the individuals we interviewed live and work in proximity to the state’s borders with
Michigan or Minnesota. Because the PI (Michele Statz) works in Minnesota and conducts research
across northern Minnesota and Wisconsin, we included this question to evaluate whether residents’
experiences of and perspectives on a neighboring state would be revealing. As evidenced in the manu-
script, some of the individuals we interviewed—as well as, apparently, their clients—were indeed
keenly aware of the services and supports that Wisconsin lacked when compared with other states like
Ala-Nikkola, Taina, Sami Pirkola, Minna Kaila, Grigori Joffe, Raija Kontio, Olli Oranta, Minna Sadeniemi,
Kristian Wahlbeck, and Samuli I. Saarni. 2018. “Identifying Local and Centralized Mental Health
Services—The Development of a New Categorizing Variable.” International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health 15(6):1131.
Alegría, Margarita, Debra L. Roter, Anne Valentine, Chih-nan Chen, Xinliang Li, Julia Lin, Daniel Rosen,
Sheri Lapatin, Sharon-Lise Normand, Susan Larson, and Patrick E. Shrout. 2013. “Patient–Clinician
Ethnic Concordance and Communication in Mental Health Intake Visits.” Patient Education and
Counseling 93(2):188–96.
Ali, Parveen Azam and Roger Watson. 2018. “Language Barriers and Their Impact on Provision of Care
to Patients with Limited English Proficiency: Nurses’ Perspectives.” Journal of Clinical Nursing
Anglin, Mary K. 2002. “Lessons from Appalachia in the 20th Century: Poverty, Power, and the ‘Grassroots.’”
American Anthropologist 104(2):565–82.
Statz et al. 17
August, Kristin J., Hannah Nguyen, Quyen Ngo-Metzger, and Dara H. Sorkin. 2011. “Language
Concordance and Patient–Physician Communication Regarding Mental Health Needs.” Journal of the
American Geriatrics Society 59(12):2356–62.
Bailey, Beth A. and Ruth Ann Daugherty. 2007. “Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy: Incidence
and Associated Health Behaviors in a Rural Population.” Maternal and Child Health Journal
Banyard, Victoria L., Katie M. Edwards, Elizabeth A. Moschella, and Katherine M. Seavey. 2018.
“‘Everybody’s Really Close-Knit’: Disconnections between Helping Victims of Intimate Partner
Violence and More General Helping in Rural Communities.” Violence Against Women 25(3):337–58.
Barcus, Holly R. and Stanley D. Brunn. 2010. “Place Elasticity: Exploring a New Conceptualization of
Mobility and Place Attachment in Rural America.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography
Baxter, Pamela and Susan Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and
Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13(4):544–59.
Bennett, Larry and Patricia O’Brien. 2007. “Effects of Coordinated Services for Drug-abusing Women
Who Are Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.” Violence Against Women 13(4):395–411.
Bird, Donna C., Patricia Dempsey, and David Hartley. 2001. Addressing Mental Health Workforce Needs
in Underserved Rural Areas: Accomplishments and Challenges. Portland, ME: Maine Rural Health
Research Center, Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Services, University of Southern Maine.
Retrieved January 24, 2021 (
Blank, Michael B., Jeanne C. Fox, David S. Hargrove, and Jean T. Turner. 1995. “Critical Issues in
Reforming Rural Mental Health Service Delivery.” Community Mental Health Journal 31(6):
Boglioli, Marc. 2009. A Matter of Life and Death: Hunting in Contemporary Vermont. Amherst, MA:
University of Massachusetts Press.
Breiding, Matthew Joseph, Jieru Chen, and Michele C. Black. 2014. “Intimate Partner Violence in the
United States—2010.” Retrieved May 14, 2021 (
Cabral, Raquel R. and Timothy B. Smith. 2011. “Racial/Ethnic Matching of Clients and Therapists in
Mental Health Services: A Meta-analytic Review of Preferences, Perceptions and Outcomes.” Journal
of Counseling Psychology 58(4):537–54.
Chapman, Anna and Catherine Monk. 2015. “Domestic Violence Awareness.” American Journal of
Psychiatry 172(10):944–45.
Chipp, Cody, Sarah Dewane, Christiane Brems, Mark E. Johnson, Teddy D. Warner, and Laura W. Roberts.
2011. “‘If Only Someone Had Told Me . . . ’: Lessons from Rural Providers.” The Journal of Rural
Health 27(1):122–30.
Colon-Gonzalez, Maria C., Jennifer S. McCall-Hosenfeld, Carol S. Weisman, Marianne M. Hillemeier,
Amanda N. Perry, and Cynthia H. Chuang. 2013. “‘Someone’s Got to Do It’—Primary Care Providers
(PCPs) Describe Caring for Rural Women with Mental Health Problems.” Mental Health in Family
Medicine 10(4):191–202.
Cooper, Lisa A. and Neil R. Powe. 2004. Disparities in Patient Experiences, Health Care Processes, and
Outcomes: The Role of Patient-provider Racial, Ethnic, and Language Concordance. New York:
Commonwealth Fund.
Cooper, Lisa A., Debra L. Roter, Rachel L. Johnson, Daniel E. Ford, Donald M. Steinwachs, and Neil
R. Powe. 2003. “Patient-centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and
Physician Race.” Annals of Internal Medicine 139(11):907–15.
DeKeseredy, Walter and Martin Schwartz. 2009. Dangerous Exits: Escaping Abusive Relationships in
Rural America. New York: Taylor & Francis.
DeKeseredy, Walter S., Amanda Hall-Sanchez, Molly Dragiewicz, and Callie M. Rennison. 2016. “Intimate
Violence against Women in Rural Communities.” Pp. 171–80 in The Routledge International
Handbook of Rural Criminology, edited by J. F. Donnermeyer. Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
18 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
de Vogel, Luisa. 2018. “Over Half of Wisconsin Counties Face a Shortage of Mental Health Care Providers.”
The Daily Cardinal. Retrieved May 24, 2021 (
Driskell, Kristen M. 2009. “Identity Confidentiality for Women Fleeing Domestic Violence.” Hastings
Women’s Law Journal 20(1):129–56.
Dworkin, Emily R., Laura Zambrano-Vazquez, Sarah R. Cunningham, Samantha L. Pittenger, Julie A.
Schumacher, Paul R. Stasiewicz, and Scott F. Coffey. 2017. “Treating PTSD in Pregnant and Postpartum
Rural Women with Substance Use Disorders.” Journal of Rural Mental Health 41(2):136–51.
Edwards, Katie M. 2015. “Intimate Partner Violence and the Rural–Urban–Suburban Divide: Myth or
Reality? A Critical Review of the Literature.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 16(3):359–73.
ERS. 2015. ERS County Typology: 2015 Edition. United States Department of Agriculture Economic
Research Service. Retrieved May 14, 2021 (
Evans, Megan Sunde Springer. 2016. “Examining the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and
Mental Health Quality of Life in a Rural Neighborhood Context.” MS (Master of Science) Thesis,
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Farrigan, Tracey. 2014. “Poverty and Deep Poverty Increasing in Rural America.” No. 1490-2016-128457.
Retrieved May 14, 2021 (
Feyen, Carol K. 2001. “Isolated Acts: Domestic Violence in a Rural Community.” Pp. 101–5 in The
Hidden America: Social Problems in Rural America for the Twenty-first Century, edited by R. Moore.
Vancouver, BC, Canada: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Freudenburg, William R. 1986. “The Density of Acquaintanceship: An Overlooked Variable in Community
Research?” American Journal of Sociology 92(1):27–63.
Gallup-Black, Adria. 2004. “Rural and Urban Trends in Family and Intimate Partner Homicide: 1980-1999.”
Report No. 208344. New York: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved May 14, 2021 (http://citeseerx
Glaser, B. and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing
Gunn, Susannah, Elizabeth Brooks, and Geoff Vigar. 2015. “The Community’s Capacity to Plan: The
Disproportionate Requirements of the New English Neighbourhood Planning Initiative.” Pp. 147–67
in Reconsidering Localism, edited by Simin Davoudi and Ali Madanipour. Abingdon, England:
Hack, Samantha M., Christopher R. Larrison, and Joseph P. Gone. 2014. “American Indian Identity in
Mental Health Services Utilization Data from a Rural Midwestern Sample.” Cultural Diversity and
Ethnic Minority Psychology 20(1):68–74.
Hartley, David. 2004. “Rural Health Disparities, Population Health, and Rural Culture.” American Journal
of Public Health 94(10):1675–78.
Hastings, Sarah L. and Tracy J. Cohn. 2013. “Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Rural Mental
Health Practice.” Journal of Rural Mental Health 37(3):37–49. doi:10.1177/1077801218768714.
Health Resources & Services Administration. 2015. “Intimate Partner Violence in Rural America.” Policy
Brief, March. Retrieved May 24, 2021 (
Heath, Olga, Elizabeth Church, Vernon Curran, Ann Hollett, Peter Cornish, Terrence Callanan, Cheri
Bethune, and Lynda Younghusband. 2014. “Interprofessional Mental Health Training in Rural Primary
Care: Findings from a Mixed Methods Study.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 29(3):195–201.
Hoeft, Theresa J., John C. Fortney, Vikram Patel, and Jürgen Unützer. 2018. “Task-sharing Approaches to
Improve Mental Health Care in Rural and Other Low-resource Settings: A Systematic Review.” The
Journal of Rural Health 34(1):48–62.
Hudson, Christopher G. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Mental Illness: Tests of the Social Causation and
Selection Hypotheses.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 75(1):3–18.
Humphreys, Cathy and Ravi Thiara. 2003. “Mental Health and Domestic Violence: ‘I Call It Symptoms of
Abuse.’” British Journal of Social Work 33(2):209–26.
Statz et al. 19
Jerant, Anthony, Klea D. Bertakis, Joshua J. Fenton, Daniel J. Tancredi, and Peter Franks. 2011. “Patient-
provider Sex and Race/Ethnicity Concordance: A National Study of Healthcare and Outcomes.”
Medical Care 49(11):1012–20.
Judd, Fiona, Henry Jackson, Angela Komiti, Greg Murray, Caitlin Fraser, Aaron Grieve, and Rapson
Gomez. 2006. “Help-seeking by Rural Residents for Mental Health Problems: The Importance of
Agrarian Values.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40(9):769–76.
Karakurt, Gunnur, Douglas Smith, and Jason Whiting. 2014. “Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on
Women’s Mental Health.” Journal of Family Violence 29(7):693–702.
Kirmayer, Laurence J., Joseph P. Gone, and Joshua Moses. 2014. “Rethinking Historical Trauma.”
Transcultural Psychiatry 51(3):299–319.
Krishnan, Satya P., Judith C. Hilbert, and Dawn VanLeeuwen. 2001. “Domestic Violence and Help-seeking
Behaviors among Rural Women: Results from a Shelter-based Study.” Family & Community Health
Kulkarni, Shanti J., Holly Bell, and Diane McDaniel Rhodes 2012. “Back to Basics: Essentail Qualities of
Services for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.” Violence Against Women 18(1):85–101.
Laing, Lesley. 2001. “Working with Women: Exploring Individual and Group Approaches.” Australian
Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse 4:1–19.
Lareau, Annette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
LaVeist, Thomas A. and Amani Nuru-Jeter. 2002. “Is Doctor-patient Race Concordance Associated with
Greater Satisfaction with Care?” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 43(3):296–306.
Linnane, Rory. 2017. “Shortage of Mental Health Care Providers Just as More Teens Seek Help.” Journal
Sentinel, November 16. Retrieved May 14, 2021 (
Lobao, Linda. 2006. “Gendered Places and Place-based Gender Identities: Reflections and Refractions.”
Pp. 267–306 in Country Boys: Masculinity and Rural Life, edited by H. Campbell, Bell Mayerfeld, and
M. Finny. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Logan, T. K., Lisa Shannon, and Robert Walker. 2005. “Protective Orders in Rural and Urban Areas: A
Multiple Perspective Study.” Violence Against Women 11(7):876–911.
McNichols, Christine, Karl J. Witt, and Donna C. Gatewood. 2016. “The Successes of Experienced Rural
Counselor Supervisors and their Recommendations for Rural Mental Health.” Journal of Rural Mental
Health 40(3–4):139–53. doi:10.1037/rmh0000058.
Meghani, Salimah H., Jacqueline M. Brooks, Trina Gipson-Jones, Roberta Waite, Lisa Whitfield-Harris,
and Janet A. Deatrick. 2009. “Patient-provider Race-concordance: Does It Matter in Improving
Minority Patients’ Health Outcomes?” Ethnicity & Health 14(1):107–30.
Merrett, Christopher D. and Cynthia Struthers. 2002. “Globalization and the Future of Rural Communities
in the American Midwest.” Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 12(33):51–57.
Miller, Geri, Cathy Clark, and Jennifer Herman. 2007. “Domestic Violence in a Rural Setting.” Journal of
Rural Mental Health 31(4):28–42. doi:10.1037/h0095975.
Nelson, Margaret. 2005. The Social Economy of Single Motherhood: Raising Children in Rural America.
New York: Taylor & Francis.
Okunrintemi, Victor, Erica Spatz, Rohan Khera, Joseph Salami, Javier Valero-Elizondo, Oluseye
Ogunmoroti, and Hakeem Ayinde et al. 2018. “Patient-provider Racial Concordance and Patient
Reported Healthcare Experience among Adults with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Insights
from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2010–2013.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Ostermann, Marlies and Jean-Louis Vincent. 2019. “How Much Centralization of Critical Care Services in
the Era of Telemedicine?” Critical Care 23:423.
Owen, Santi and Kerry Carrington. 2015. “Domestic Violence (DV) Service Provision and the Architecture
of Rural Life: An Australian Case Study.” Journal of Rural Studies 39:229–38.
Peek-Asa, Corinne, Anne Wallis, Karisa Harland, Kirsten Beyer, Penny Dickey, and Audrey Saftlas. 2011.
“Rural Disparity in Domestic Violence Prevalence and Access to Resources.” Journal of Women’s
Health 20(11):1743–49.
20 Sociological Perspectives 00(0)
Pruitt, Lisa R. 2008. “Place Matters: Domestic Violence and Rural Difference.” Wisconsin Journal of Law
Gender & Society 23(2):347–419.
Ratcliff, Michael, Charlynn Burd, Kelly Holder, and Alison Fields. 2016. “Defining Rural at the U.S. Census
Bureau: American Community Survey and Geography Brief.” ACSGEO-1, December. Washington,
DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved May 14, 2021 (
Rennison, Callie, Walter DeKeseredy, and Molly Dragiewicz. 2012. “Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations
in Separation/Divorce Rape/Sexual Assault: Results from the National Crime Victimization Survey.”
Feminist Criminology 7(4):282–97.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Susan R. Fisk. 2012. “Class Rules, Status Dynamics, and ‘Gateway’ Interactions.”
Pp. 131–51 in Facing Social Class: How Societal Rank Influences Interaction, edited by S. Fiske and
H. Markus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Robinson, W. David, Paul R. Springer, Richard Bischoff, Jenenne Geske, Elizabeth Backer, Michael Olson,
Kimberly Jarzynka, and Jonathan Swinton. 2012. “Rural Experiences with Mental Illness: Through the
Eyes of Patients and Their Families.” Families, Systems, & Health 30(4):308–21.
Roush, Karent and Ann Kurth. 2016. “The Lived Experience of Intimate Partner Violence in the Rural
Setting.” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 45(3):308–19.
Shannon, Lisa, T. K. Logan, Jennifer Cole, and Karen Medley. 2006. “Help-seeking and Coping Strategies
for Intimate Partner Violence in Rural and Urban Women.” Violence and Victims 21(2):167–81.
Sherman, Jennifer. 2009. Those Who Work, Those Who Don’t: Poverty, Morality, and Family in Rural
America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Shim, Janet K. 2010. “Cultural Health Capital: A Theoretical Approach to Understanding Health Care
Interactions and the Dynamics of Unequal Treatment.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Shoemaker, Donald J. and Harold L. Nix. 1972. “A Study of Reputational Community Leaders Using
the Concepts of Exchange and Coordinative Positions.” The Sociological Quarterly 13(4):516–24.
Smith, Kristin E. and Ann R. Tickamyer. 2011. Economic Restructuring and Family Well-being in Rural
America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Stanley, Nicky and Bridget Penhale. 1999. “The Mental Health Problems of Mothers Experiencing the Child
Protection System: Identifying Needs and Appropriate Responses.” Child Abuse Review 8(1):34–45.
Statz, Michele and Kaylie Evers. 2020. “Spatial Barriers as Moral Failings: What Rural Distance Can Teach
Us about Women’s Health and Medical Mistrust.” Health & Place 64:102396. doi:10.1016/
Statz, Michele and Lisa Pruitt. 2019. “A Spatial Reading of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Legal
Recognition of the Tyranny of Distance.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51:
1106–27. doi:10.1177/0308518X18757508.
Statz, Michele and Paula Termuhlen. 2020. “Rural Legal Deserts Are a Critical Health Determinant.”
American Journal of Public Health 110:1519–22. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305807.
Street, Richard L., Gregory Makoul, Neeraj K. Arora, and Ronald M. Epstein. 2009. “How Does
Communication Heal? Pathways Linking Clinician–Patient Communication to Health Outcomes.”
Patient Education and Counseling 74(3):295–301.
Street, Richard L., Kimberly J. O’Malley, Lisa A. Cooper, and Paul Haidet. 2008. “Understanding
Concordance in Patient-physician Relationships: Personal and Ethnic Dimensions of Shared Identity.”
The Annals of Family Medicine 6(3):198–205.
Struthers, Cynthia B. and Janet L. Bokemeier. 2000. “Myths and Realities of Raising Children and Creating
Family Life in a Rural County.” Journal of Family Issues 21(1):17–46.
Teaster, Pamela B., Karen A. Roberto, and Tyler A. Dugar. 2006. “Intimate Partner Violence of Rural
Aging Women.” Family Relations 55(5):636–48.
Thiede, Brian C., Daniel T. Lichter, and Tim Slack. 2018. “Working, but Poor: The Good Life in Rural
America?” Journal of Rural Studies 59(3):183–93.
Thom, David H., Mark A. Hall, and L. Gregory Pawlson. 2004. “Measuring Patients’ Trust in Physicians
when Assessing Quality of Care.” Health Affairs 23(4):124–32.
Thornberg, Robert and Kathy Charmaz. 2014. “Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding.” Pp. 153–69 in
The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by Uwe Flick. London: Sage Publications.
Statz et al. 21
Tickamyer, Ann R. and Debra A. Henderson. 2003. “Rural Women: New Roles for the New Century.”
Pp. 109–117 in Challenges for Rural America in the Twenty-first Century, edited by D. Brown and
L. E. Swanson. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Timmermans, Stefan and Iddo Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded
Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30(3):167–86.
Tittman, Sarah M., Christy Harteau, and Kristen M. Beyer 2016. “The Effects of Geographic Isolation and
Social Support on the Health of Wisconsin Women.” WMJ 115(2):65–9.
Traylor, Ana H., Julie A. Schmittdiel, Connie S. Uratsu, Carol M. Mangione, and Usha Subramanian.
2010. “Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Medications: Does Patient-provider Race/Ethnicity and
Language Concordance Matter?” Journal of General Internal Medicine 25(11):1172–77.
Trevillion, Kylee, Elizabeth Corker, Lauren E. Capron, and Siân Oram. 2016. “Improving Mental Health
Service Responses to Domestic Violence and Abuse.” International Review of Psychiatry 28(5):
Vogenberg, F. Randy and John Santilli. 2018. “Healthcare Trends for 2018.” American Health & Drug
Benefits 11(1):48–54.
Walker, Robert and T. K. Logan. 2018. “Health and Rural Context among Victims of Partner Abuse: Does
Justice Matter?” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 33(1):64–82.
Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault (WCASA). 2020. “Service Providers. Retrieved May 14,
2021 (
Wolf, Jordan and Michele Statz. 2018. “Wisconsin Judicare Community Needs Assessment. Retrieved
May 14, 2021 (
World Health Organization. 2003. Organization of Services for Mental Health. Geneva, Switzerland:
World Health Organization. Retrieved January 19, 2021 (
Zhang, Zhiwei, Alycia Infante, Michael Meit, Ned English, Michael Dunn, and Kristine Harper Bowers. 2008.
“An Analysis of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disparities & Access to Treatment Services in the
Appalachian Region: Final Report.” Appalachian Regional Commission. Retrieved May 24, 2021 (https://
Author Biographies
Michele Statz is an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth and affiliated
faculty with the University of Minnesota Law School. Michele is trained as an anthropologist of law, and
her research examines how socio-spatial dimensions of rurality influence access to justice, rights mobiliza-
tion, and the efforts of tribal and state court judges in northern Minnesota and Wisconsin. Michele’s research
has appeared in Law & Society Review, Harvard Law & Policy Review, and American Journal of Public
Health and is generously funded by the National Science Foundation’s Law and Science Program.
Katie R. Billings is a graduate student in the Sociology Department at the University of Massachusetts,
Amherst and a graduate fellow for the UMass Center for Justice, Law, & Societies. Billings’ research exam-
ines the creation and reproduction of inequality in the mental health and legal fields. Her dissertation, which
is funded by the National Science Foundation, is a qualitative study of suicide in the U.S. and includes in-
depth interviews with suicide survivors. Billings’ research is published in Social Science & Medicine, Law
& Society Review, and Sociological Perspectives.
Jordan Wolf is a fourth-year medical student at the University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth
intending to pursue a career in anesthesiology. Her research expertise includes identifying neurobiological
and behavioral mechanisms that mediate the stress response and chronic pain. As part of an interdisciplinary
approach, she is interested in how rurality mediates these effects.
... Previous researchers document the underutilization of mental health services among communities of color, men and boys, young people, rural residents, and people in lower socioeconomic positions (Biddle et al. 2007;Eisenberg et al. 2007;Lindsey et al. 2010;Neighbors et al. 2007;Stewart et al. 2015). Structural barriers and a lack of culturally appropriate care contribute to these disparities (Williams, Rosen, and Kanter 2019), but sociocultural barriers are also partly responsible for these disparities in mental health care seeking (Horwitz et al. 2020;Statz et al., 2021). Indeed, the literature on mental illness stigma demonstrates that stigma is a context-dependent social process that remains one of the most cited barriers to seeking mental health care (Clement et al. 2015;Hernandez 2018, 2020;Horwitz et al. 2020;Pescosolido and Martin 2015;Pietrzak et al. 2009). ...
Full-text available
First-generation and working-class undergraduates not only experience mental health problems at higher rates than their more affluent peers, but are also less likely to seek treatment. We administered a mixed-methods survey to undergraduates at two institutions to investigate the relationship between cultural capital and mental health decision-making. Using two measures of cultural capital, we find that students with high cultural capital are more likely to seek mental health treatment than those with limited cultural capital. Additionally, analysis of our qualitative results reveals that while students with limited cultural capital make treatment decisions through a collectivistic lens (considering other people’s needs and opinions), those with high cultural capital tend to view treatment decisions through an individualistic lens (considering their own needs and opinions). These lenses capture both the barriers and facilitators to mental health care that students cite to explain their decision-making. Understanding how cultural capital shapes orientations to mental health care is necessary to facilitate help-seeking for students from all social class backgrounds.
Researchers and policymakers concerned with Addressing Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders (PMADs) in rural places tend to implicitly center on rural physical and informational infrastructures. As a result, distance, professional shortages, and digital barriers are largely foregrounded in recommended interventions and initiatives. This manuscript recognizes but also exceeds these dimensions by turning to “knowledge infrastructure.” As we demonstrate, a knowledge infrastructure framework illuminates the often-overlooked relationships, routine interactions, and non-dominant forms of expertise that enable a wide range of stakeholders, including but not limited to medical professionals, to mitigate many of the risks and barriers associated with perinatal mental health care in rural spaces. Bringing together anthropological theory, health policy, and qualitative interviews with over 75 individuals across a rural region in the U.S., our findings outline the ways in which critical mental health supports reach diverse perinatal individuals, shape community awareness, and reflect trusted forms of expertise in an otherwise professionally and socio-economically marginalized rural context. By presenting these data through a knowledge infrastructure framework, this manuscript highlights novel practices and new entry points for meaningful, rurallyrelevant interventions that benefit individual health and community wellbeing.
In the United States, rural economic marginalization and corresponding gaps in employment, affordable housing, health care, nutrition, and education put individuals at high risk for legal need. Yet many rural regions are “legal deserts” with few, if any, attorneys, and prevailing access-to-justice initiatives tend to neglect the unique challenges posed by rurality. The efforts of rural tribal and state court judges, though often overlooked in scholarship and policy, offer a compelling response to this inequitable access-to-justice context. Building on emergent work on “active judging,” or when judges step away from a traditional passive role to assist unrepresented parties, this manuscript explores how rural place and place attachments shape diverse judges’ interactions with litigants. It draws on mixed-methodological research across seven tribal and state courts in the upper Midwest to shed light on rural judges’ efforts, how these efforts are regarded by unrepresented parties, and to what extent a shared experience of rurality provides a meaningful form of “access.” In so doing, it offers a novel spatial intervention in scholarship on access to justice and active judging and contributes to more rurally relevant justice practices.
Full-text available
The challenges of mental health and substance abuse services (MHS) require shifting of the balance of resources from institutional care to community care. In order to track progress, an instrument that can describe these attributes of MHS is needed. We created a coding variable in the European Service Mapping Schedule-Revised (ESMS-R) mapping tool using a modified Delphi panel that classified MHS into centralized, local services with gatekeeping and local services without gatekeeping. For feasibility and validity, we tested the variable on a dataset comprising MHS in Southern Finland, covering a population of 2.3 million people. There were differences in the characteristics of services between our study regions. In our data, 41% were classified as centralized, 37% as local without gatekeeping and 22% as local services with gatekeeping. The proportion of resources allocated to local services varied from 20% to 43%. Reclassifying ESMS-R is an easy way to compare the important local vs. centralized balance of MHS systems globally, where such data exists. Further international studies comparing systems and validating this approach are needed.
We introduce “rural legal deserts,” or rural areas experiencing attorney shortages, as a meaningful health determinant. We demonstrate that the absence of rural attorneys has significant impacts on public health—impacts that are rapidly exacerbated by COVID-19. Our work builds on recent scholarship that underscores the public health relevance of attorneys in civil and criminal contexts. It recognizes attorneys as crucial to interprofessional health care teams and to establishing equitable health-related laws and policies. Attorney interventions transform institutional practices and help facilitate the stability necessary for health maintenance and recovery. Yet, critically, many rural residents cannot access legal supports. As more individuals experience unemployment, eviction, and insecure benefits amid the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for attorneys to address these social determinants of health as legal needs. Accordingly, the growing absence of attorneys in the rural United States proves particularly consequential—because of this pandemic context but also because of rural health disparities. We argue that unless a collaborative understanding of these interrelated phenomena is adopted, justice gaps will continue to compound rural health inequities. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print August 20, 2020: e1–e4. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305807)
Policy attention to growing rural “health care deserts” tends to identify rural distance as a primary spatial barrier to accessing care. This paper brings together geography, health policy, and ethnographic methods to instead theorize distance as an expansive and illuminating concept that highlights place-based expertise. It specifically engages rural women's interpretations of rural distance as a multifaceted dimension of accessing health care, which includes but is not limited to women's health services and maternity care. Presenting qualitative research with 51 women in a rural region of the U.S., thematic findings reveal an interpretation of barriers to rural health care as moral failings rather than as purely spatial or operational challenges, along with wide communication of negative health care experiences owing to spatially-disparate but trusted social networks. Amid or owing to the rural crisis context, medical mistrust here emerges as a meaningful but largely unrecognized barrier to rural women's ability—and willingness—to obtain health care. This underscores how a novel interpretation of distance may inform policy efforts to address rural medical deserts.
Social support is key to well-being for victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), and bystanders have an important role to play in preventing IPV by taking action when there is risk for violence. The current study used qualitative interviews to explore young adults’ perspectives on helping in situations of IPV, and more general helping, in the rural communities in which they resided. Participants were 74 individuals between the ages of 18 and 24 years from 16 rural counties across the eastern United States. Participants generally described their communities as close-knit and helpful, especially around daily hassles (e.g., broken down car) and unusual circumstances (e.g., house fire). Although participants generated ways in which community members help IPV victims, these mostly focused on providing support or taking action in the aftermath of IPV as opposed to more preventive actions. Lack of financial resources were uniquely cited as a barrier to more general helping, whereas concerns about privacy and lack of deservingness of help were barriers to both general helping and helping in IPV situations, although these were more pronounced in IPV situations than general helping situations. Taken together, these results suggest that although people generally see their communities as helpful and close-knit, these perceptions and scripts did not necessarily translate to helping in situations of IPV. Bystander intervention programs are needed that provide more specific helping scripts for IPV.
Distance—physical, material distance—is an obviously spatial concept, but one rarely engaged by legal or feminist geographers. We take up this oversight in relation to the 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, which adjudicated the constitutionality of a Texas law that imposed new regulations on abortion providers. Because half of the state’s abortion providers were unable to meet these regulations and thus closed, the distance that many Texas women had to travel for abortion services increased dramatically. In part because of these increases, the Supreme Court ultimately determined that the Texas laws imposed an unconstitutional “undue burden.” Bringing together case law and ethnographic data, this article traces the process by which distance is made legally “legible” in the context of reproductive injustice. In so doing, it confronts more uneasy realities of distance, including the discursive dismissal of social and literal immobility and isolation; contradictory readings of “emptiness”; and the material spatiality of distance through the nonplace-ness of rural areas. Together, these factors illuminate a more significant distance, namely the epistemic and social distance that exists between the legal performance of distance in litigation and the embodied traversal of distance by a woman seeking an abortion in Texas. Prioritizing rural distance as material, legal and gendered, our work engages and augments the nascent field of feminist legal geographies. It likewise challenges legal geographers’ insistence on urban space by uncovering the ways in which even the relative “emptiness” of distance is intimately consequential. Finally, this paper makes connections between the exercise of the abortion right and the exercise of other rights that implicate distance, most notably the right to vote. Just as abortion regulations have often had the effect of requiring women to travel farther for abortion services, voter ID laws have the effect of requiring voters to travel to a public agency in order to secure the requisite identity document. Other voting regulations and state and local voting practices may similarly impose spatial burdens on voters. We thus assert that what Whole Woman’s Health reveals about making distance legally cognizable finds ready legal application in other contexts.
Aim and objective: To explore nurses' perspectives of language barriers and their impact on the provision of care to patients with limited English proficiency from diverse linguistic background. Design and methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Using individual interviews and focus group discussions, data were collected from 59 nurses working in tertiary care hospitals in England. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Findings: Three themes, "multi-ethnicities and language barriers," "the impact of language barriers" and "communicating via interpreters," were identified. Communication was identified as the most important aspect of care provision and an essential component of a nurse's professional role regardless of the clinical area or speciality. Language barriers were identified as the biggest obstacles in providing adequate, appropriate, effective and timely care to patients with limited English proficiency. Use of professional interpreters was considered useful; however, the limitations associated with use of interpretation service, including arrangement difficulties, availability and accessibility of interpreters, convenience, confidentiality and privacy-related issues and impact on the patient's comfort were mentioned. Conclusions: Language barriers, in any country or setting, can negatively affect nurses' ability to communicate effectively with their patients and thereby have a negative impact on the provision of appropriate, timely, safe and effective care to meet patient's needs. Relevance to clinical practice: An understanding of language barriers can help nurses find appropriate strategies to overcome such barriers and, consequently, enhance the provision of effective care to patients affected by language barriers in any clinical setting in any healthcare system. The findings of the study have international relevance as language barriers affect healthcare provision in any country or setting.