ArticlePDF Available

Impact of Electricity Shortages on Productivity: Evidence from Manufacturing Industries

Tech Science Press
Energy Engineering
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Electricity shortages present a significant constraint on manufacturers, who rely on electricity as an important input into production. In China, electricity supply has been growing rapidly. However, the rapid industrialization sometimes makes the power supply still unable to meet the demand. Using a survey of 1673 Chinese manufacturing firms, this paper explores how firms response to electricity shortages and its impact on productivity. We find that self-generation of electricity and investment in Research and Development (R&D) have significant positive relationships with electricity shortages. Further investigations reveal that self-generation is the most common way to deal with electricity shortages. However, it aggravates productivity loss. Though investment in Research and Development can promote productivity, it cannot offset the negative impact of electricity shortages on productivity. Analyses on subsamples show heterogeneity in the impacts of electricity shortages across firms. In particular, large firms are more inclined to invest in R&D than small and medium-sized firms are. They are also the one who suffer significant productivity loss due to self-generation of electricity. Though it is possible for medium-sized firms to reduce productivity loss through R&D, they are not likely to invest in R&D as a response to electricity shortages. This study illustrates that firms can hardly have effective solutions to electricity shortages, and policy makers should take great efforts to increase electricity supply.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Impact of Electricity Shortages on Productivity: Evidence from Manufacturing
Industries
Xinhong Xue
1
and Zhongcheng Wang
2
,
*
1
School of Finance, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu, 233030, China
2
School of International Trade and Economics, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu, 233030, China
*Corresponding Author: Zhongcheng Wang. Email: 120180005@aufe.edu.cn
Received: 11 October 2020 Accepted: 30 November 2020
ABSTRACT
Electricity shortages present a signicant constraint on manufacturers, who rely on electricity as an important
input into production. In China, electricity supply has been growing rapidly. However, the rapid industrialization
sometimes makes the power supply still unable to meet the demand. Using a survey of 1673 Chinese manufactur-
ing rms, this paper explores how rms response to electricity shortages and its impact on productivity. We nd
that self-generation of electricity and investment in Research and Development (R&D) have signicant positive
relationships with electricity shortages. Further investigations reveal that self-generation is the most common way
to deal with electricity shortages. However, it aggravates productivity loss. Though investment in Research and
Development can promote productivity, it cannot offset the negative impact of electricity shortages on produc-
tivity. Analyses on subsamples show heterogeneity in the impacts of electricity shortages across rms. In parti-
cular, large rms are more inclined to invest in R&D than small and medium-sized rms are. They are also
the one who suffer signicant productivity loss due to self-generation of electricity. Though it is possible for
medium-sized rms to reduce productivity loss through R&D, they are not likely to invest in R&D as a response
to electricity shortages. This study illustrates that rms can hardly have effective solutions to electricity shortages,
and policy makers should take great efforts to increase electricity supply.
KEYWORDS
Electricity shortages; research and development; productivity; electricity efciency
1 Introduction
Infrastructure is widely perceived to be basic and important for economic growth. For some resources,
like electricity, reliable and economic storage is hardly possible. Unreliable supply of electricity requires
rms to respond in other ways to ensure their performance.
In the past decades, China has spent greatly on power sector. However, electricity supply remains as an
important issue for Chinas economic and social development [13]. According to the prediction by China
Electricity Council (CEC), in the second half of 2020, there are still power shortages in Hunan, Jiangxi,
Guangdong, and Western Inner Mongolia during the peak period. Production and operation are suspended
when electivity is cut off. Though the cutoff is supposed to be orderly arranged, and enterprises can
adjust their production plan accordingly, losses are unavoidable. Responses, such as self-supply of
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.32604/EE.2021.014613
ARTICLE
ech
T
PressScience
electricity with generators, are taken to reduce the losses as much as possible. However, these responses can
be costly by themselves.
In this paper, we study how rms respond to electricity shortages and the impact on productivity. First,
we try to nd out whether there are effective measures to deal with power failure. To this end, we examine
rmsinvestment in technology, labor and generator. Although the impact of energy prices on productivity
and output has been recognized by the existing research, little discussion has been done about the impact of
electricity shortages on the investment in technologies. As most innovations in production processes are
reliant on electricity, we can expect that the electricity intensity of an industry is positively associated
with its technology intensity. In this case, electricity shortages would result in less use of new
technologies. An alternative is to invest in more electricity-efcient technologies, which may offset the
impact of electricity shortages on productivity. In this paper, we will explore how rms respond to
electricity shortages from the perspective of investment in technology.
Second, we also identify other possible partial solutions: Use of temporary workers and generating
electricity as site, namely self-generation. Although policymakers are well aware that electricity
shortages can be obstacles for economic growth, it is difcult to increase electricity supply in a short
period, because the construction of power infrastructure normally will take several years. The uctuation
of electricity demand and the delay of electric power investment will inevitably result in an unbalance
between electricity demand and supply. Quantifying the distortions of rmsactivities due to electricity
shortages will motivate policymakers to advance the plan for electric power investment.
Third, we examine whether rmsresponses can reduce the productivity loss caused by electricity
shortages. If the productivity loss due to electricity shortages cannot be reduced at rm level, increasing
electricity supply at the country level will be the best solution. For the policymakers, it is important to
increase power supply, and to do it in environmental-friendly way. This study will underline the
important role government plays in developing clean energy and promoting economic growth.
The remainder of the paper is organized as following. Section 2 is literature review; Section 3 represents
our empirical strategy, including the descriptions of data, the empirical model, and the variables we will use.
In Section 4, we will represent our results and discussion and Section 5 will be the conclusions.
2 Literature Review
This paper is part of the extensive literature that evaluates the economic effects of investment in
infrastructure. Based on a panel of 18 OECD countries during 18702009, Farhadi [4] found that the
growth of infrastructure could positively inuence the growth of labor productivity and total factor
productivity. Similarly, Banerjee et al. [5] found that access to transportation networks had a positive
causal effect on per capita GDP. Yu et al. [6] found positive spatial spillover effects of transport
infrastructure in Chinese regions during 19782009. Dimitriou et al. [7] studied the economic effects of
mega infrastructure project. Applying the input-output (IO) method, Dimitriou et al. [8] analyzed the
economic footprint of air transport in Greece, and found that the air transport sector contributed 10.8% of
the national GDP. When assessing the macroeconomic impact of Nigers Kandaji Dam project, Beguy
et al. [9] found that construction of the project spurred domestic production and increased GDP by 0.25.
The econometric estimations based on panel surveys of the households in rural Vietnam suggested that
grid electrication beneted not only the households in income, expenditure, and educational outcomes,
but also the rural economy as a whole [10]. Some studies have focused on the disproportionate impact of
public infrastructure deciencies. For example, Hallward-Driemeier et al. [11] and Dollar et al. [12]
revealed that in developing countries enterprisesaccess to infrastructure services varied by type of
service and rm size, with smaller rms shouldering disproportionate burdens.
996 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
Our paper is also part of the subset studies concerning about the impact of energy, especially electricity
supply, on economic growth and performance. Chakravorty et al. [13] examined the effects of connecting a
household to the grid and daily electricity supply on non-agricultural incomes. Using a panel of more than
10,000 households during the period between 1994 and 2005, they found that a grid connection could
increase non-agricultural incomes of rural households by about 9 percent. Lipscomb et al. [14] examined
the long-term effects of electrication on local income and population density in Brazil. They found large
positive effects of improved electricity supply on in-migration of people and rms. Based on an
econometric analysis with data from 1953 to 2010, Cheng [15] revealed that Chinas electricity
generation growth way-one Granger caused her GDP growth. Ou et al. [16] used a CGE model to
simulate the impacts of electricity shortages on Chinas Economy. They found that electricity shortages
affected the macro-economy negatively, and the light industry, the coal production industry, and the
heavy industry were most affected. Study of Pakistans agriculture sector, industrial sector, and service
sector also revealed that electricity shortages deteriorated output [17]. Moreover, power shortages led to
the closure of factories and the losses of jobs [18].
Some studies focused on the effects of electricity shortages on rmsactivities. To offset the negative
impacts of electricity shortages on operation, industrial rms often opt for self-generation of electricity.
A review of 25 sub-Saharan countries by Foster et al. [19] showed that in-house generation accounted for
more than 25 percent of the installed generating capacity, though self-generation is over 300 percent more
expensive than electricity supplied from the grid. Similarly, the study on developing countries by Alby
et al. [20] revealed that unreliable electricity supply induced rms to invest in costly generators or to
settle for second-best technologies in sectors whose rst-best technology depended heavily on electricity.
In these sectors, small rms were squeezed out of the nancial market by a high prevalence of power
outages and unable to borrow to expand production. Hallward-Driemeier et al. [11] and Dollar et al. [12]
also documented patterns of access to infrastructures in developing countries and show that electricity
were often the largest barrier, especially for small rms.
Besides the more adverse impact on small rms, unreliable electricity supply also has negative effects on
industry choices and performance. Abeberese [21] found that Indian rms switched to less electricity-
intensive production processes when there was an increase in electricity price, which led to lower output
and productivity growth rates. On the contrary, electricity network expansion could lead to an increase in
manufacturing output [22]. Allcott et al. [23] found that electricity shortages reduced the average Indian
rms revenues and producer surplus. Fisher-Vanden et al. [1] estimated the impacts of electricity
shortages in the early 2000s on Chinese manufacturing rms. They found that rms purchased more
electricity-intensive inputs in response to electricity shortages. This shift from maketo buy, namely
outsourcing, could be costly, but helped rms to avoid substantial productivity losses. A recent study
by Elliott et al. [24] revealed that as a result of rising electricity costs, Chinese manufacturing rms were
more likely to switch to a less energy intensive industry.
3 Methodologies
3.1 Data and Information on Chinese Firms
The material we use for empirical study is the World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES) of Chinese
manufacturing rms. The WBES conducted in 2012 provides the information on a random sample of
1,673 manufacturing rms over the scal year 2011 in 25 Chinese cities
1
. Most of these cities are in
eastern China and are either capital cities or main cities. The experience of these typical cities in
2011 could well represent the effects of energy supply on Chinese economic development in the past
decades of years.
1
The samples are from the following 25 cities: Hefei, Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan,
Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Wuhan, Nanjing, Wuxi, Suzhou, Nantong, Shenyang, Dalian, Jinan, Qingdao, Yantai, Shanghai, Chengdu,
Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou.
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 997
Firmslocations and sizes can change their access to electricity. Capital cities or main cities, especially
those in eastern provinces, have priorities in electricity consumption, as they are the economic centers.
Important economic position makes it possible that these cities experience less power outages. Therefore,
it is plausible to believe that rms in these cities are less affected by electricity shortages. This may be a
disadvantage, because the impact of electricity shortages would be underestimated. Another important
factor is rmssizes. Large rms play an important role in local economic development. Though enjoying
more bargaining power over resources access, they are also vulnerable as they may use more machines in
production process. In fact, about 12% of the large rms in our investigation reported that they
experienced at least one power outage in a typical month in 2011.
Our work provides rm-level distribution of energy shortages. Based on the rm-level data on power
outages in a typical month over the scal year 2011, we build up two indicators of electricity shortages.
The measure is to divide rms into three groups. The rst group consists of rms who reported
experiencing no power outage. The second group includes rms who reported experiencing one power
outage in a typical month. The third group consists of rms who experienced two or more outages a
month. Among the 232 rms who experienced power outages 51 rms reported that they experienced
more than two times of outages a month, and 181 rms reported only one outage a month. Fig. 1 shows
the distribution of power outages.
The WBES dataset also provides information on sales, employees, investment in Research and
Development and so on over the scal year 2011. Tab. 1 is a summary of the information including the
number of rms, power outages, the average number of permanent and temporary employees, and the
number of rms who used licensed technology, invested in research and development (R&D), and owned
or shared a generator. According to the number of permanent, full-time employees at the end of 2011,
there are 228 rms with employees less than 20, and 724 rms with more than 100 employees. Firms
with employees between 20 and 100 are most likely to suffer from power outages. There are totally
210 rms owning or sharing a generator, and almost half of them are large rms. The large rms also
have the largest average number of temporary, full-time workers, the highest ratio of investing in R&D
and using licensed technology from a foreign company.
Figure 1: Distribution of power outages in a typical month and rmspermanent, full-time workers
998 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
There seems to be positive relationships between electricity shortages and self-generation, use of
temporary workers, and investment in new technology including using licensed technology from foreign
companies and investing in R&D. When production is signicantly affected by electricity shortages, rms
will respond in a number of ways to offset the effect. For example, a rm may choose to invest in more
electricity-efcient technologies either by investing in R&D or by buying technology from other
companies, which will increase output when electricity is available. Owning or sharing a generator will
provide self-generating electricity during blackout. If power outages are seasonal or scheduled, using
temporary workers to produce more when there are no blackouts are plausible.
In the following empirical analysis, we rst explore the ways Chinese manufacturing rms respond to
electricity shortages. Their responses have important policy implications. If there is a signicant positive
relationship between electricity shortages and investing in R&D, it implies that the investment in R&D
might be able to improve electricity efciency. Such technology will improve productivity, and at the
same is environmental friendly. Using licensed technology from foreign companies may have the same
implication. If a signicant positive relationship is found between electricity shortages and owning or
sharing a generator, it indicates that Chinese manufacturing rms turn to self-generation and might suffer
productivity loss, becasue the price of self-generation is higher than that of grid. If the production is
electricity-intensive, it is less likely to offset the effect of electricity shortages by using more labors as
most of the production processes depend on machines. A signicant positive relationship between
electricity shortages and temporary, full-time workers might imply that the production is less dependent
on electricity and more labor-intensive.
The second issue we are interested in is whether the above possible responses are able to relieve or offset
the impact of electricity shortages on rmsproductivity. Take R&D investment for example. Technology
innovation is closely related to productivity improvement. If productivity-enhancing technologies are
those that are electricity-intensive, technology development will make production more relied on
electricity. In this case, only more electricity-efcient technology will bring higher productivity when
there are electricity shortages.
According to the discussion above, we develop three testable hypotheses:
1. Investment in technology: Firms may invest in R&D or licensed technology from foreign-owned
companies when facing electricity shortages, implying a potential productivity improvement.
2. Self-Generation: Firms may turn to self-generation during power outages, resulting in high
production cost and low productivity.
3. Temporary workers: Firms may substitute away from machines toward labors to ensure production,
implying switching to less electricity-intensive industries.
Table 1: Descriptions of electricity shortages and other factors
Firm size Number
of rms
Power outages Generator Employees Temporary
workers
Licensed
technology
R&D
One Two or more
small 228 24 (10.6%) 3 (1.3%) 19 (8.3%) 13 3 21 (9.2%) 46 (20.2%)
medium 721 94 (13.2%) 19 (2.7%) 90 (12.5%) 55 8 148
(20.5%)
294
(40.8%)
large 724 63 (8.8%) 29 (4.0%) 101
(14.0%)
609 18 231
(31.9%)
379
(52.3%)
all rms 1673 181
(10.9%)
51 (3.1%) 210
(12.6%)
289 12 400
(23.9%)
719
(43.0%)
Note: Firms with employees less than 20 are small; rms with 20 to 100 employees are medium; rms with over 100 employees are large.
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 999
3.2 Empirical Model
To test the three hypotheses presented in Section 3.1, we start with examining the relationship between
electricity shortages and the possible responses: Investment in technology, self-generation and using
temporary, full-time workers. To this end, we use the following empirical Model 1:
responsei¼a0þa1outageiþa2outagesiþcontfirmiþcont regionrþgrþgjþei(1)
where idenotes rm, rdenotes region, and jdenotes industry. response
i
denotes rms responses to
electricity shortages, including investing in R&D, using licensed technology from foreign companies,
owning or sharing a generator, and using temporary, full-time employees. outage
i
and outages
i
are
indicators of power outages the rms experienced in a typical month. cont_rm
i
is a set of rm-level
control variables, including labor-productivity, human capital, size, ownership and exporting experience.
cont_region
r
consists of two region-level control variables, GDP and population of the cities where the
rms locate. η
r
and η
j
are xed effects for city and industry, respectively, to control bias due to
unobserved factors. ε
i
is the error term that includes all the unobservable factors.
Another important issue is whether these responses can offset the impact of electricity shortages on
productivity. As most of the production processes are reliant on electricity, we might expect it to be the
case that these responses are to relieve the impact of electricity shortages on productivity. The
identication of the effects is achieved through the presence of interaction terms between the indicators of
power outages and the indicators of the responses. A positive and signicant coefcient indicates that a
certain response can reduce productivity loss due to electricity shortages. To this end, we use the
following empirical Model 2:
laborprodi¼a0þa1outageiþa2outagesiþa3outageiresponseiþa4outagesireponsei
þ0cont firmiþcont regioniþgrþgjþei
(2)
where i,jand rdenote rm, industry and region, respectively. laborprod
i
represents labor productivity. All
the other symbols have the same meaning as in Model 1.
3.3 Measurements
1. Electricity shortages: outage
i
and outages
i
. In WBES dataset, the rms reported how many power
outages they experienced in a typical month. For rms who reported one power outage in a
typical month, variable outage
i
will be assigned value of one. Otherwise, it will be assigned zero.
outages
i
is one for rms who reported two or more outages. Otherwise, it is zero.
2. Investment in technology: R&D
i
and licensed_tech
i
. We use two dummies to indicate whether the
rms had invested in new technology. Dummy R&D
i
is equal to one for rms who had spent on
R&D. A second variable to measure investment in new technology, licensed_tech
i
, is based on the
report on whether using technology licensed by a foreign-owned company, excluding ofce
software. For the rms who reported Yes ,licensed_tech
i
is equal to one.
3. Self-generation: self_g
i
.self_g
i
is equal to one if a rm owned or shared a generator.
4. Temporary worker: temp_w
i
. It is the number of full-time seasonal or temporary workers.
5. Control variables: cont_rm
i
(rm-level control variables) and cont_region
r
(region-level control
variables). laborprod
i
denotes rmsproductivity. As there is no information on total output for
the calculation of total factor productivity, we use sales per capita as a proxy, where sales are
total annual sales for all products and services. worker_edu
i
, denoting human capital, is the ratio
of employees who completed second school to the total of full-time permanent workers. exporter
i
,
a dummy, is equal to 1 if more than 10% of the products is exported directly. According to the
denition of foreign direct investment in Chinese Statistical Yearbook, we dene foreign
i
as a
1000 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
dummy, equal to 1 if private foreign individuals, companies or organizations own over 10% share of
the rms. laborprod
i
,worker_edu
i
,exporter
i
, and foreign
i
are all rm-level control variables. The
region-level control variables include city_GDP
j
and city_pop
j
, denoting GDP and resident
population of the cities where the rms are located.
The denitions and sources of the variables are summarized in Tab. 2. The descriptive statistics are
presented in Tab. 3.
Table 2: Variables, their denitions and sources
Variable
type
Variable Denition Data sources
Electricity
shortages
outage Dummy, One power outage in a typical month World Bank
Enterprise Survey
outages Dummy, two or more power outages in a typical month
Possible
responses
R&D Dummy, investing in R&D World Bank
Enterprise Survey
licensed_tech Dummy, use licensed technology from a foreign-owned
company, excluding ofce software
self_g Dummy, own or share a generator
temp_w Number of full-time seasonal or temporary workers
cont_rm:laborprod labor productive: Logarithm of sales per capita World Bank
Enterprise Survey
worker_edu Human capital: Ratio of full-time permanent workers who
completed second school
exporter Dummy, more than 10% of the products is exported directly
foreign Dummy, over 10% share of the rms are owned by private
foreign individuals, companies or organizations
cont_region: city_GDP Logarithm of city GDP Statistical
yearbooks of each
city
city_pop Logarithm of resident population of the cities
Table 3: Descriptive statistics
Variable Mean SD Min Max
outage 0.109 0.311 0 1
outages 0.030 0.172 0 1
R&D 0.433 0.495 0 1
licensed_tech 0.241 0.428 0 1
self_g 0.125 0.331 0 1
temp_w 11.979 38.400 0 600
laborprod 12.458 1.034 8.911 17.770
worker_edu 50.285 28.205 0 100
exporter 0.198 0.398 0 1
foreign 0.075 0.264 0 1
city_GDP 8.646 0.451 7.701 9.862
city_pop 6.735 0.261 6.377 7.761
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 1001
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Response of Chinese Manufacturing Firms as a Whole to Electricity Shortages
Our rst step is to investigate rmsresponses to electricity shortages by estimating the Model 1. Tab. 4
reports the results. We omit the rm-level and region-level control variables in odd-numbered columns (1),
(3), (5) and (7). Our results remain qualitatively unchanged when these variables are controlled for in the
even-numbered columns, indicating that our results are robust to a certain extent.
In column (1) and column (2), the coefcients on outage and outages are all positive and signicant
when the dependent variable is R&D. In column (2), the coefcients on outage and outages are
0.373 and 0.471, respectively. Electricity shortages increase the probability of investing in R&D. One
power outage a month increases the probability of investing in R&D by approximately 13.6%. The
probability would be even higher, namely 17.2%, if there are two power outages in a typical month.
The coefcients on control variables, except foreign and city_GDP, are positive and signicant. The
signicant positive relationship between electricity shortages and investment in R&D suggests that when
facing electricity shortages, rms are likely to adopt new and advantage technologies or machines. We
will investigate in Sector 4.4 whether R&D investment aims at relieving the impact of electricity
shortages on productivity.
Table 4: Estimations for rmsresponse and electricity shortages
Dependent Variable: response
Independent
Variables
response =R&D response =licensed_tech response = temp_w response =self-g
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
outage 0.196*
(0.101)
0.373***
(0.106)
0.069
(0.110)
0.075
(0.119)
2.972
(4.008)
3.932
(4.299)
1.187***
(0.106)
1.153***
(0.110)
outages 0.478***
(0.183)
0.471**
(0.190)
0.024
(0.197)
0.122
(0.201)
14.518
(10.278)
13.862
(10.293)
1.337***
(0.183)
1.175***
(0.185)
city_pop 0.386**
(0.171)
0.460***
(0.175)
12.623***
(4.304)
0.366
(0.228)
city_GDP 0.477***
(0.094)
0.193*
(0.102)
6.633**
(2.820)
0.256**
(0.122)
laborprod 0.198***
(0.032)
0.076**
(0.035)
1.893*
(1.047)
0.100**
(0.041)
worker_edu 0.007***
(0.001)
0.006***
(0.001)
0.015
(0.031)
0.005***
(0.001)
foreign 0.203
(1.127)
0.719***
(0.125)
1.251
(4.554)
0.212
(0.162)
exporter 0.427***
(0.084)
0.437***
(0.089)
6.017**
(2.995)
0.360***
(0.106)
constant 0.088
(0.088)
1.393
(1.013)
0.364***
(0.097)
6.614***
(1.057)
18.858***
(2.856)
34.702
(27.646)
1.505***
(0.125)
2.370*
(1.362)
City xed effects & Industry xed effects are controlled
observations 1647 1621 1645 1617 1631 1609 1658 1631
R
2
0.01 0.07 0.03 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.16
Notes: (1) *, **, ***: Coefcients are statistically signicant at the levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively. (2) In the parentheses are robust standard
error.
1002 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
Though R&D is an important source for technology development, the failure of R&D will result in
nothing of any new or advanced technologies. Besides, self-reported R&D investment could be noisy and
subjective because it is based on the rmsself-assessment about their product or process innovations.
Therefore, following Montalbano et al. [25], we use variable licensed_tech as an indicator of investment
in advanced technology. The results are presented in column (3) and column (4). To our surprise, the
coefcients on outage are not signicant. Neither are the coefcients on outages. In column (5) and
column (6) are the estimations for using temporary, full-time workers. The coefcients on outage and
outages are positive, but not signicant. This means using more temporary labors is not a popular way to
deal with electricity shortages.
Column (7) and column (8) report the results for owning or sharing a generator. The coefcients on the two
indicators of electricity shortages are positive and signicant at the 1% level. In particular, for rms who reported
one outage a month, the probability of owning or sharing a generator is 19.6 percent higher. For rms who
experienced two or more outages, the probability is almost 20 percent higher. It is highly possible that rms
use self-generated electricity to relieve the impact of electricity shortages on their production.
4.2 Robustness Tests
As can be seen from Tab. 1, the small rms have the smallest sample size and the lowest ratio in
spending on R&D and generator. Spending on R&D and generator have a higher request for nancing
ability. However, small rms are in an inferior positon. Missing of the control for rmsabilities to
obtaining nance may result in misleading conclusions. In Tab. 4, the insignicant coefcients on power
outages may catch not only the effect of power outages, but also the effect of nancial abilities. The rms
reported to what degree access to nanceis an obstacle to their operation in the WBES. Thus, we add
anance-specic variable, naccess, to Model 1. naccess is equal to zero when access to nance is
reported as no obstacleor minor obstacle, and equal to one when access to nance is regarded as
moderate obstacle,major obstacle,orvery severe obstacle. The results are presented in column (1)
and column (4) of Panel A and Panel B in Tab. 5. After controlling for the nancial abilities, there
remain signicant positive relationships between electricity shortages and two types of responses, namely,
investment in R&D and self-generation. Our results remain qualitatively unchanged from those in Tab. 4.
Table 5: Robustness tests
Dependent variable: response
Panel A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
response =R&D response =licensed_tech
outage 0.321*** (0.107) 0.368*** (0.107) 0.383*** (0.114) 0.081 (0.119) 3.932 (4.299) 0.072 (0.125)
outages 0.505*** (0.194) 0.522** (0.193) 0.457** (0.197) 0.114 (0.201) 13.862 (10.293) 0.115 (0.205)
constant 1.993* (1.066) 1.332 (1.033) 0.822 (1.093) 6.797*** (1.072) 34.702 (27.646) 6.859*** (1.151)
observations 1611 1611 1410 1607 1609 1405
R
2
0.09 0.08 0.07 0.12 0.02 0.11
Panel B response =temp_w response =self-g
outage 3.190 (4.363) 3.588 (4.245) 3.912 (4.855) 1.147*** (0.111) 1.174*** (0.111) 1.209*** (0.119)
outages 14.329 (10.390) 14.378 (10.477) 14.188 (10.923) 1.195*** (0.189) 1.219*** (0.188) 1.241*** (0.192)
constant 30.775 (28.273) 25.658 (27.732) 24.331 (31.737) 2.344* (1.396) 2.355* (1.407) 2.542* (1.457)
observations 1598 1598 1397 1620 1620 1418
R
2
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.18 0.18
Notes: (1) *, **, ***: Coefcients are statistically signicant at the levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively. (2) In the parentheses are robust standard
error. (3) Control variables and xed effects are also included in estimating, but not reported here in order to save space.
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 1003
To investigate whether the above results hold, we use another measure of naccess. When access to
nance is taken as major obstacleor very severe obstacle,naccess is equal to one. Otherwise, it is
equal to zero. The results are reported in column (2) and column (5) of Panel A and Panel B. We get
consistent results, too.
Another source of bias is the sample size of the small rms. The small rms take only 13.6% of the
whole sample. The WBES sample for China is selected using stratied random sampling at three levels:
Industry, establishment size, and region. To some degree, the small sample size of the small rms is due
to their small part in the industry or in the region. For the sake of robustness, Model 1 is estimated
without the small rms. The results are presented in column (3) and column (6) of Panel A and Panel B
in Tab. 5. Again the results are very similar to the previous ones.
4.3 Heterogeneity in Responses to Electricity Shortages
In sector 4.1, we investigate the ways rms respond to electricity shortages using all the rms as a
sample, and the results are proved robust in Sector 4.2. However, how to respond to electricity shortages
is also related to some characteristics of the rms. For example, investment in R&D and licensed
technology incur high costs. Small rms usually have less nancial resource to cover the costs. On the
other hand, small rms are more exible in management and production plan so that it is more possible
for them to offset the impact through coordinating production plans with electricity supply. The WBES
classies rms into three groups: Small, medium, large according to their number of employees. The
small rms are those with less than 20 employees (excluding 20). The medium-sized rms are those with
20 to 100 employees (excluding 100). The rms with more than 100 employees are large. Tab. 6 reports
the results of the heterogeneous responses to electricity shortages across rms of different sizes.
As can be seen in Tab. 6, the heterogeneous responses exist mainly in the relationship between electricity
shortages and investment in R&D. In particular, column (1) and column (2) in Panel A represent the results
Table 6: Heterogeneous responses to electricity shortages
Dependent variable: response
Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
small rms medium-sized rms large rms small rms medium-sized rms large rms
Panel A
response =R&D response =liecensed_tech
outage 0.233 (0.309) 0.203 (1.151) 0.729*** (0.193) 0.029 (0.417) 0.037 (0.187) 0.127 (0.178)
outages 0.449 (0.802) 0.263 (0.307) 0.606** (0.263) —— 0.017 (0.343) 0.212 (0.259)
constant 4.987* (2.812) 0.340 (1.561) 0.965 (1.601) 4.706 (3.313) 6.736*** (1.760) 7.203*** (1.587)
observations 225 695 701 223 691 700
R
2
0.04 0.04 0.12 0.25 0.14 0.09
Independent variables Panel B
response =temp_w response =self_g
outage 2.516 (1.525) 0.813 (1.723) 10.907 (11.746) 0.792** (0.322) 1.273*** (0.164) 1.266*** (0.183)
outages 2.114 (2.293) 1.287 (3.740) 21.613 (17.514) —— 1.460*** (0.305) 1.129*** (0.246)
constant 17.355 (10.806) 74.277** (32.626) 2.623 (56.730) 0.795 (3.556) 2.146 (2.280) 2.416 (1.932)
observations 225 694 690 216 698 707
R
2
0.05 0.04 0.03 0.07 0.17 0.21
Notes: (1) *, **, ***: Coefcients are statistically signicant at the levels of 10%, 5% and 1% respectively. (2) In the parentheses are robust standard error. (3)
Other control variables and xed effects are also included in estimating, but not reported here in order to save space. (4) “—” means perfect collinearity.
1004 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
for the small rms and the medium-sized rms, respectively. The coefcients on outage and outages are
positive, but not signicant. It is probably because R&D is a too costly for them. Contrary to the small
and the medium-sized rms, we nd a signicant positive relationship between electricity shortages and
R&D investment in the large rms as shown in column (3) Panel A.
From column (4) to column (6) in Panel A and from column (1) to column (3) in Panel B are results for
using licensed technology and temporary workers, respectively. No coefcients on the indicators of
electricity shortages are signicant. In contrast, all the coefcients on the indicators of electricity
shortages in columns (4), (5), and (6) in Panel B are positive and signicant, implying that all rms,
regardless of their sizes, are likely to turn to self-generation. Our nding differs from Fisher-Vanden et al.
[1] in respective of large rms. Their sample focused on the largest electricity users and they found that
large rms did not self-generate electricity often.
So far, we have consistently found that when the rms are faced with electricity shortages, they are likely
to invest in R&D, or to generate electricity themselves. However, we do not nd any evidence for adopting
licensed technology or hiring temporary workers as solutions to electricity shortages.
4.4 Effects on Labor Productivity
In Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3, our empirical analyses reveal that investment in R&D and self-generation
are positively related to electricity shortages. We want to nd out whether these responses can relieve the
negative impact of electricity shortages on productivity. To this end, we estimate Model 2. Our interest is
on the interaction terms involving the responses and the indicators of electricity shortages. We expect that
the coefcients on the interaction terms will be positive, if a certain response can offset the impact of
electricity shortages on productivity.
Tab. 7 reports the results. From column (1) to column (4) are the results for R&D investment. The result
for all rms in column (1) shows that no interaction terms are signicant, while the coefcients on R&D is
positive and signicant at the 1% level. Investing in R&D can promote labor productivity, but cannot offset
the impact of electricity shortages. The results from column (2) to column (4) reveal that in medium-sized
rms it is not the case. In particular, the coefcient on the interaction term of outages and R&D in
column (3) is positive and signicant at the 5% level, implying that R&D investment in medium-sized
rms can improve labor productivity by offsetting the impact of electricity shortages. We do not nd the
same effects in the large rms or in the small rms. Instead, we nd that in the large rms the coefcient
on R&D is signicant and positive, while the coefcients on the interaction terms are not signicant.
Therefore, the positive effect of R&D investment on productivity exists mainly in the large rms, while
the effect of offsetting the negative impact of electricity shortages exists mainly in the medium-sized rms.
From column (5) to column (8) in Tab. 7 are the results for self-generation. To our surprise, the
coefcients on the interaction terms are all negative. Particularly, the coefcients on the interaction terms
of self-generation and the indicator of outages are negative and signicant in the full sample and the sub-
sample of large rms. Generating electricity on site not only requires additional capital and diesel
purchases, but also crowds out other investment opportunities and reduces productivity. When power
outages happen occasionally, self-generation will ensure rms from output reduction. However, self-
generation is costly. Frequent self-generation will make it less advisable because it will increase
production cost disproportionally, especially when the production is highly electricity dependent, such as
in large rms who use more machines or more electricity-intensive technologies. Therefore, we reach the
conclusion that rms do not self-generate electricity to reduce the loss of labor productivity due to
electricity shortages.
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 1005
5 Conclusions
In this study, we explore the responses of manufacturing rms to electricity shortages and their effects on
labor productivity using the WBES dataset. We nd that when facing electricity shortages, rms of all sizes
switch to self-generation. However, self-generation causes productivity loss, which is most obvious in the
large rms to whom generators are most accessible. We also nd that rms, especially large rms, are
more probable to spend on R&D. Nevertheless, the medium-sized rms benet from R&D from the
perspective of reducing productivity loss due to electricity shortages. The large rms can improve their
productivity through R&D, but cannot offset the negative impact of electricity shortages. Besides, we do
not nd that using more labors or licensed technologies can play important roles in coping with
electricity shortages. To sum up, our study reveals that self-generation is the most adopted, but also costly
solution to electricity blackouts. Technology developments from R&D can promote productivity, but
cannot offset the negative impact of blackouts on productivity.
The results of this paper underline the importance of infrastructure supply in developing countries. Faced
with infrastructure constrainsin this case, unreliable electricity supplyrms may use costly self-generation
in an attempt to rely less on that infrastructure. However, this damages productivity. Though new technology is
usually supposed to promote productivity, our ndings remind us that electricity shortages cannot be offset by
technology innovations in manufacturing sectors, because technology development makes machines more
widely used, and thus production becomes more electricity-intensive. Although this paper addresses
electricity shortages specically, one can imagine that rms may react in undesirable ways to cope with
other infrastructure constraints. The ndings in this study also imply the important role the government
should play in infrastructure supply, as it can hardly be economically self-sufcient at rm level. Although
our study seem to suggest that more power plants be built, this conclusion could not be made at the
expenses of environment. Actually, it is more advisable for policy makers to consider other mechanisms to
trade off the social cost of investing in energy supply with the benets.
Funding Statement: This work is supported by Philosophy and Social Sciences Planned Project of Anhui
Province, China(Grant No. AHSKY2020D37).
Table 7: Estimations for the effects on labor productivity
Dependent variable: laborprod
Independent
Variables
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
all rms small medium large all rms small medium large
response =R&D response = self_g
outage
response
0.089
(0.146)
0.206
(0.573)
0.111
(0.173)
0.049
(0.236)
0.158
(0.176)
0.841
(0.524)
0.001
(0.221)
0.014
(0.315)
outages
response
0.101
(0.333)
1.913
(2.153)
0.743**
(0.364)
0.162
(0.279)
0.607**
(0.293)
—— 0.303
(0.426)
0.737***
(0.283)
response 0.325***
(0.055)
0.243
(0.154)
0.118
(0.078)
0.554***
(0.087)
0.259**
(0.101)
0.241
(0.205)
0.130
(0.155)
0.348**
(0.160)
constant 11.361***
(0.758)
11.646***
(1.844)
11.966***
(1.013)
10.444***
(1.262)
11.625***
(0.761)
11.690***
(1.787)
12.047***
(1.027)
11.116***
(1.281)
observations 1622 225 696 701 1631 226 698 707
R
2
0.05 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.06
Notes: (1) *, **, ***: Coefcients are statistically signicant at the levels of 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively. (2) In the parentheses are robust standard
error. (3) Independent variables outage and outages, other control variables, and xed effects are also included in estimating, but not reported here in
order to save space. (4) “——” means perfect collinearity.
1006 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
Conicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conicts of interest to report regarding the
present study.
References
1. Fisher-Vanden, K., Mansur, E. T., Wang, Q. (2015). Electricity shortages and rm productivity: Evidence from
Chinas industrial rms. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 172188. DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.01.002.
2. Lin, B., Wang, Y. (2019). Inconsistency of economic growth and electricity consumption in China: A panel VAR
approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 144156. DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.396.
3. Tsai, C. M. (2011). The reform paradox and regulatory dilemma in Chinas electricity industry. Asian Survey,
51(3), 520539. DOI 10.1525/as.2011.51.3.520.
4. Farhadi, M. (2015). Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transportation
Research, 74, 7390. DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.006.
5. Banerjee, A., Duo, E., Qian, N. (2012). On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth
in China. NBER Working Paper No. 17897.
6. Yu, N., de Jong, M., Storm, S., Mi, J. (2013). Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure: Evidence from
Chinese regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 5666. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.10.009.
7. Dimitriou, D. J., Mourmouris, J. C., Sartzetaki, M. F. (2015). Economic impact assessment of mega infrastructure
pipeline projects. Applied Economics, 47(40), 43104322. DOI 10.1080/00036846.2015.1026591.
8. Dimitriou, D., Sartzetaki, M. (2018). Assessing air transport socio-economic footprint. International Journal of
Transportation Science and Technology, 7(4), 283290. DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.07.001.
9. Beguy, O., Dessus, S., Garba, A., Hayman, J., Herderschee, J. (2015). Modeling the impact of large infrastructure
projects: A case study from Niger. MFM Discussion Paper No. 7.
10. Barnes, D. F., Khandker, S. R., Nguyen, M. H., Samad, H. A. (2016). Welfare impacts of rural electrication:
Evidence from Vietnam. Policy Research Working Paper, 61(3), 659692.
11. Hallward-Driemeier, M., Stewart, D. (2004). How do investment climate conditions vary across countries, regions
and types of rms? Background Paper for the 2005 World Development Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.
12. Dollar, D., Hallward-Driemeier, M., Mengistae, T. (2005). Investment climate and rm performance in developing
Economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(1), 131. DOI 10.1086/431262.
13. Chakravorty, U., Pelli, M., Ural Marchand, B. (2014). Does the quality of electricity matter? Evidence from rural
India. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107, 228247. DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.04.011.
14. Lipscomb, M., Mobarak, A. M., Barham, T. (2013). Development effects of electrication: Evidence from the
topographic placement of hydropower plants in Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(2),
200231. DOI 10.1257/app.5.2.200.
15. Cheng, Y. S., Wong, W. K., Woo, C. K. (2013). How much have electricity shortages hampered Chinas GDP
growth? Energy Policy, 55, 369373. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.015.
16. Ou, P., Huang, R., Yao, X. (2016). Economic impacts of power shortage. Sustainability, 8(7), 687. DOI 10.3390/
su8070687.
17. Shahbaz, M. (2015). Measuring economic cost of electricity shortage: Current challenges and future prospects in
Pakistan. Mpra Paper, No. 67164.
18. Siddiqui, R., Jalil, H. H., Nasir, M., Malik, W. S., Khalid, M. (2011). The cost of unserved energy: Evidence from
selected industrial cities of Pakistan. PIDE-Working Papers No. 2011:75.
19. Foster, V., Steinbuks, J. (2009). Paying the price for unreliable power supplies: In-house generation of electricity
by rms in Africa. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4913, World Bank, Washington, DC.
20. Alby, P., Dethier, J. J., Straub, S. (2013). Firms operating under electricity constraints in developing countries.
World Bank Economic Review, 27(1), 109132. DOI 10.1093/wber/lhs018.
21. Abeberese, A. B. (2017). Electricity cost and rm performance: Evidence from India. Review of Economics and
Statistics, 99(5), 839852. DOI 10.1162/REST_a_00641.
EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4 1007
22. Rud, J. P. (2012). Electricity provision and industrial development: Evidence from India. Journal of Development
Economics, 97(2), 352367. DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.06.010.
23. Allcott, H., Collardwexler, A., Connell, S. D. O. (2016). How do electricity shortages affect productivity?
Evidence from India. American Economic Review, 106(3), 587624. DOI 10.1257/aer.20140389.
24. Elliott, R., Sun, P., Zhu, T. (2019). Electricity prices and industry switching: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing
rms. Energy Economics, 78, 567588. DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.029.
25. Montalbano, P., Nenci, S. (2019). Energy efciency, productivity and exporting: Firm-level evidence in Latin
America. Energy Economics, 79, 97110. DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.033.
1008 EE, 2021, vol.118, no.4
Article
Full-text available
Electricity shortages pose significant challenges for enterprises, significantly impacting productivity, efficiency, technological advancement and economic growth. This study systematically examines the effects of electricity shortages on enterprises and proposes resilient energy management strategies. Utilizing a systematic literature review methodology, the study identifies and analyses thirteen major challenges and ten mitigation strategies. Key challenges, reviewed using the people, process, and technology framework are found to include productivity loss, increased production costs, decreased investment, and labor, income loses. The broader implications of these challenges on economic growth are profound, as businesses encounter obstacles in expanding operations, attracting investments, and fostering overall productivity and development. While on the other hand, mitigation strategies encompass self-generation, renewable energy use, and comprehensive risk management plans. By effectively addressing these challenges and integrating the strategies into risk management plans, businesses can enhance their resilience to energy-related disruptions.
Chapter
In this context, the objective of this study is to contribute to the debate on how we can promote the installation of renewable energy systems in companies. To this end, this study focuses on the sustainability reporting of Indian companies, specifically. Their energy disclosure in order to improve energy efficiency and self-auto sufficiency. A content analysis of the sustainability reports and some statistical tests were conducted to better understand what Indian companies disclose about energy and whether there is a relationship between the disclosed information. The findings led to the conclusion that out of the sample analyzed, 10% do not disclose any energy information. The most reported information refers to “Energy Disclosing company's energy policies” and “Conservation of energy in the conduct of business operations”. And that when companies disclose “Energy consumption outside of the organization” they also disclose their “Energy consumption within the organization”. The same with “Reductions in energy requirements of products and services” and “Reduction of energy consumption”. In other words, there is a correlation between the disclosure of these topics. Most reports let companies prefer to use solar energy (70%). The electricity price can also be an important variable in this role. This shows that most Indian companies are concerned about reporting information on their energy management, but there is still a lack of information and a long way to go to achieve excellence in energy efficiency. The importance of government policymaker’s promoting clean energy and fulfilling the demands of electricity in all sectors will fuel long-term economic growth. It is important that legislative changes remove obstacles and boost the adoption of renewable energy in the future. So, this study can therefore be a practical contribution to this debate.KeywordsSustainability reportEnergy efficiencyContent analysisIndia
Article
Full-text available
Air transportation and economic development interact with each other as aviation makes significant direct and indirect contributions to the economy and increases the cycle of economic activity. Conventional wisdom is to provide an effective tool to provide quantitative estimations on the socioeconomic effects of air transport. This paper focuses on the estimation of the air transport footprint in terms of socioeconomic impacts in national economy. The socioeconomic effects assessment concept and methodology are given, providing an essential tool for planners, economists, analysts and researchers. The methodology concept and modelling approach provide essential benefits to support decisions on air transport infrastructures investments prioritization, fund allocation and sustainable strategic planning. The goal is to provide an essential decision support tool for strategic decisions about planning new air transport infrastructure, when resources are limited, in order to maximize the potential of social and economic development. The numerical application is Greece, which is a very attractive summer holiday tourist destination in southeast Mediterranean, suffering long time from economic stress. The results indicate that air transport is essential for Greece and thorough the last year’s economic downturn is resulting higher dependence to aviation mainly because the tourism and air transport linkage and the high spill-over effect of both industries to national economic model. Keywords: Air transport, Socioeconomic impact of aviation, Input output analysis, Regional development
Article
Full-text available
The electricity industry is a basic industry of the national economy. It has experienced several large-scale power shortages, hard power shortage and soft power shortage, which have brought a great threat to China’s sustainable economic development. To solve this problem better, it is necessary to make a quantitative assessment of the economic impacts of power shortage. The CGE model is commonly used for simulating economic shocks and policy effects. It describes supply, demand and equilibrium in different markets by simulating the economic mechanism through a set of equations. Once changed, the exogenous variables will affect a certain part of the system and then the whole system, leading to changes in quantities and prices. The equilibrium state will also change from one to another. A static CGE model is built in this paper, and the Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) of eight sectors of China in 2007 is compiled, in order to simulate the economic impacts of hard power shortage and soft power shortage. Simulation results show that the negative effects of power shortage on economic development are very significant, and the effects vary in different sectors. Especially, under the background of hard power shortage, the industrial sector suffers most. The economic cost of power shortage is considerable, and the main reason for it is the specific administrative pricing system in China. The low electricity price in the long term will lead to insufficient construction and hard power shortage; moreover, that in the short run would result in soft power shortage. In order to solve the problem of power shortage completely, power system reform is inevitable.
Article
This paper estimates the effect of access to transportation networks on regional economic outcomes in China over a twenty-year period of rapid income growth. It addresses the problem of the endogenous placement of networks by exploiting the fact that these networks tend to connect historical cities. Our results show that proximity to transportation networks have a moderately sized positive causal effect on per capita GDP levels across sectors, but no effect on per capita GDP growth. We provide a simple theoretical framework with empirically testable predictions to interpret our results. We argue that our results are consistent with factor mobility playing an important role in determining the economic benefits of infrastructure development.
Article
China has the largest electricity system in the world, which is undergoing a critical market reform. Based on the panel data in 2000 to 2016 of China, this paper tries to explain theinconsistency between electricity consumption and economic growth. For example, in 2015, GDP growth rate was close to 6.9% but with only 2.9% growth in electricity consumption. However, in 2018, a 6.6% growth in GDP required an 8.5% electricity growth. The results explain the reasons for inconsistency and identify the key factors. We find that the increase in inventory, fixed capital and industrial electricity consumption will narrow the gap when economy grows faster than electricity consumption, and widen the gap on the contrary. Heterogeneity exists among regions, the model and variables seem most convincing in explaining the situation in the western region, which is most similar to the full sample of China. Feedback effect is also observed between electricity consumption and economic growth in most parts of China by Granger test. The findings provides suggestions for the policy makers in making power planning, in an effort to avoid large power shortage or surplus.
Article
Energy is an essential input into a firm's production process. In this paper we investigate how electricity price changes across Chinese provinces affect the decision of firms to switch production from one industry to another. To address potential endogeneity between electricity prices and unobservable province level policies we construct an instrument from the interaction of regional coal production and thermal power generation capacity. Our instrumental variable results show that manufacturing firms are more likely to switch the industry of their main product to a less energy intensive industry as a result of rising electricity costs. More specifically, a 10% increase in the price of electricity leads to an increase in the probability of switching to a less energy intensive industry of around 2.3%. Our findings suggest that a well designed electricity price scheme can encourage firm behaviour than is consistent with reductions in energy use.
Article
This work explores the relationship between energy efficiency, productivity and exporting for a sample of firms located in thirty Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries. This relationship has not been studied in depth although it is important and relevant to policymaking. We apply a standard constant returns to scale Cobb-Douglas production function with labor, capital, and knowledge expanded to exports and energy efficiency. We also investigate the relationship between energy efficiency and exporting and take heterogeneity by firms and industries into account. Firm-level data come from the national representative World Bank Enterprise Survey (WBES). Our empirical analysis finds heterogeneous results by firm size and industrial sector both in the relationship between energy efficiency and productivity and between energy efficiency and exporting. These outcomes are robust to different measures of energy efficiency and controlling for heterogeneity among countries and provinces. By providing for the first time an extensive investigation of energy intensity and firm performance for such a large sample of LAC countries, this work contributes to the lively debate on LAC energy efficiency and weak productivity. By adopting a broader productivity and international trade perspective, it opens the ground to a rethinking of the priorities of energy saving policies and their environmental impacts.
Article
Using data on Indian firms, I provide evidence on how electricity prices affect a firm's industry choice and productivity growth. I construct an instrument for electricity price as the interaction between coal price and the share of thermal generation in a state's total electricity generation capacity. I find that in response to an exogenous increase in electricity price, firms switch to less electricity-intensive production processes within narrowly defined industries, reduce their machine intensity, and have lower output and productivity growth rates. Thus, electricity constraints may limit a country's growth by leading firms to operate in industries with fewer productivity-enhancing opportunities. © 2017 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Article
We estimate the effects of electricity shortages on Indian manufacturers, instrumenting with supply shifts from hydroelectric power availability. We estimate that India's average reported level of shortages reduces the average plant's revenues and producer surplus by 5 to 10 percent, but average productivity losses are significantly smaller because most inputs can be stored during outages. Shortages distort the plant size distribution, as there are significant economies of scale in generator costs and shortages more severely affect plants without generators. Simulations show that offering interruptible retail electricity contracts could substantially reduce the impacts of shortages.
Article
The economic development features for the decades after the Second World War provide evidence that investments to new infrastructures are a key driver in strengthening the national economy and enhancing nation’s productivity, as it creates economic benefits and additional income. However, the decision for fund allocation and investments in mega infrastructure pipeline projects often must be made in conditions that are much more fraught with uncertainty. The key question in such decisions is if the economic impact caused by the new project could be able to essentially boost the economy by creating new jobs and generating new income on one hand; and which are the business sectors expected to archive the benefits of this investment. This article deals with the estimation of the mega infrastructure pipeline project economic effects in economy. The methodological framework is based on input-output approach providing quantitative estimations about the economic impact of the project in terms of new income and jobs. The numerical application deals with the assessment of a cross-border crude oil pipeline project, connecting the ports of Burgas (Bulgaria) and Alexandroupolis (Greece), establishing a new transportation corridor for the crude oil from Black Sea to Southeast Mediterranean.