ArticlePDF Available

Introduction to the Special Issue: Relationships in the Time of COVID-19

Authors:

Abstract

This introduction describes the background for the special issue entitled “Relationships in the Time of COVID-19: Examining the Effects of the Global Pandemic on Personal Relationships.” It also examines reasons for conducting interdisciplinary research on COVID-19 and personal relationships, and previews first articles published in the special issue.
Introduction
Introduction to the special
issue: Relationships in the
time of COVID-19
Jennifer L. Bevan
1
and Pamela J. Lannutti
2
Abstract
This introduction describes the background for the special issue entitled “Relationships
in the Time of COVID-19: Examining the Effects of the Global Pandemic on Personal
Relationships.” It also examines reasons for conducting interdisciplinary research on
COVID-19 and personal relationships, and previews first articles published in the special
issue.
Keywords
COVID-19, personal relationships
At the heart of this special issue is a personal relationship, and the panicky and growing
necessity for two old friends to feel connected across the United States as an uncertain,
terrifying pandemic increasingly hooked its tentacles into the world.
How it started
We first met in the fall of 1999, when Jen arrived in Athens, Georgia to start the Ph.D.
program in Communication at the University of Georgia, and where Pam had been a
graduate student since 1995. We bonded immediately, sharing not only research inter-
ests, but also nearby upbringings in the Philadelphia area, and the sorts of romantic
drama that only grad school seems to invite. Luckily, our friendship actually grew after
1
Chapman University, USA
2
Widener University, USA
Corresponding author:
Jennifer L. Bevan, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Email: bevan@chapman.edu
Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships
2021, Vol. 38(6) 1753–1758
ªThe Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/02654075211018506
journals.sagepub.com/home/spr
J S P R
we finished our Ph.D.’s, and we continued doing research together to maintain our
connection.
So, it should not have been too much of a surprise to Jen when an email from Pam
entitled “wanna do this together?” landed in her inbox on April 7, 2020. As most of you
likely cannot forget, April 2020 was less than a month into the initial throes of the
COVID-19 pandemic and a time of lockdown for most around the world. Indeed, we
were both in the strictest of state and local lockdowns in California (Jen) and Penn-
sylvania (Pam) in the U.S. at that time.
While Jen was spending a lot of her lockdown time in a depressed, unproductive haze,
Pam’s mind was whirring away. For almost 20 years, Pam’s research on marriage and
LGBTQþpeople had examined the ways that societal level changes affect personal
relationships. As different communities gained marriage equality or banned it or gained
it again, Pam had investigated how dynamic social and civil shifts impacted couples,
families, and friends. Combining Pam’s research expertise with that of Jen’s, which
focuses on dark side topics such as jealousy, infidelity, and conflict, as well as how
relational partners manage health issues related to family caregiving and chronic illness,
created what we felt was an ideal pairing for better understanding the interplay between
COVID-19 and personal relationships. Now, COVID-19 was clearly going to bring
large-scale societal shifts that were likely to affect personal relationships in significant
ways. Given our long-time involvement with IARR, we wanted JSPR to be a showcase
for research on COVID-19 and personal relationships. Within a couple of weeks,
and with easy coordination with Editor-in-Chief Melissa Curran, the special issue was
finalized and being publicized online. We were on our way. And now here we are, 1 year
later, writing this introduction.
For most of us, fear and helplessness was the overwhelming experience in those early
days of the pandemic. This potent combination was what motivated us to propose this
special issue—we had to do something to stay connected and to make sense of what we
do best, and are most passionate about—studying personal relationships.
Many in academia felt the same way, as the very nature of our jobs, our relationships,
and our interactions with our students and colleagues fundamentally shifted locations,
responsibilities, and modes. Despite the burnout, stress, and extra time and effort
associated with these changes, scholars immediately rose to the challenge and began
asking important empirical questions about the pandemic’s impact on their chosen area
of study. Scientifically, we believe that there has never been such an abrupt, yet
thoughtfully and expertly undertaken, shift in research focus to one overarching topic
across so many different research areas and academic disciplines in history. A topic has
never yet demanded it, until now.
Though any number of academic disciplines can reasonably argue that the COVID-19
pandemic has influenced their research priorities to a uniquely extreme extent, we
believe this is the case when it comes to the study of personal relationships. We offer just
two of many possible examples why. First, the sheer breadth of the types of relationships
that can be affected means that there are countless possible opportunities for shifting
relational trajectories. For example, how could grandparent and grandchildren rela-
tionships change after not seeing one another for an extended period of time during
lockdown? How could cultural and ethnicity differences potentially moderate those
1754 Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38(6)
changes? How well—and/or how poorly—will romantic couples fare while spending
more time together during their “COVID year?” What will this mean for their rela-
tionships long-term? How will fewer visits from family members and friends—and the
accompanying lack of nonverbal cues such as touch, eye contact, and overall nonverbal
immediacy—translate into short- and long-term health implications for nursing home
residents?
Second, the depth of relational knowledge and communication within one personal
relationship means that multiple, complex issues can arise when faced with a long-term
crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. In a romantic relationship, for instance, to what
extent might married couples with children shift their conflict patterns to different topics
and styles when the entire family is in closer proximity to one another during lockdown,
working from home, and/or home schooling? How did Black couples relationally
manage the additional stressors and anxieties initiated by George Floyd’s murder in May
2020 and the resulting protests and racial unrest in the United States, coupled with the
ongoing pandemic? How did same-sex couples who were just forging a relationship—
perhaps via an online dating app or other technological means—at the beginning of a
lockdown period navigate that transition communicatively?
Woven into these examples are questions related to communication, health, culture,
social psychology, intergenerational issues, aging/gerontology, caregiving, and marriage
and family studies. Of course, these topics, and the many and varied disciplines from
which they emerge, exemplify the incredibly interdisciplinary and intersectional nature
of the study of personal relationships. Indeed, we sought to reflect this in our call for
papers for this special issue by soliciting manuscripts that placed a high value on
diversity, equality, and inclusion, and by specifically seeking to publish studies with
diverse samples and varied methodological approaches.
How it’s going
After the special issue call was published, we nervously waited to see when (even if)
extended abstracts would be submitted. Would personal relationship scholars have
composed themselves enough to conduct research early in the pandemic? Were indi-
viduals—particularly in the understudied and diverse groups we were hoping would be
part of the samples submitted in the first round of extended abstracts—willing to take
part in research studies about how their relationships were affected by COVID-19 so
early on in the pandemic?
Just as with everything else in 2020, it turned out that COVID-19 was all we could
think about, and interest and participation from researchers and even from participants
was extraordinary. We ultimately received over 100 initial extended abstract submis-
sions, from authors residing in 33 different countries. We invited 78 of these abstracts to
submit full manuscripts by February 2021 and are currently in the process of concluding
the first round of review of the full manuscripts that were submitted by this deadline.
We will conduct and report on a full survey of the patterns (and deviations) across our
final set of studies in the conclusion to this special issue (stay tuned!), but there are a
number of interesting findings in the studies we have already accepted for publication
that we wanted to highlight here. For example, relational turbulence theory and the
Bevan and Lannutti 1755
communication theory of resilience have already been fruitful theoretical frameworks.
Specifically, Goodboy et al. (2021) found that college dating relationships were more
turbulent and less interdependent during the pandemic compared to how they were
recalled pre-pandemic. Further, in Lillie et al. (2021), greater use of communicative
resilience processes during the first wave of COVID-19 were negatively, directly related
to relational uncertainty and negatively related to dyadic coping in married individuals in
the U.S.
Findings in unique relationship contexts are of note as well in this first issue of
published COVID-19 articles. For instance, in same-sex relationships, experiencing
higher perceived threat of COVID-19 predicted greater avoidance of complaints, which
then predicted decreased relationship satisfaction, and increased depression, anxiety, and
substance use (Li & Samp, 2021). The relationship between COVID-19 perceived threat
and relationship satisfaction was particularly strong for people of color and those with
greater internalized homophobia (Li & Samp, 2021). Further, for single individuals,
physical attractiveness remained an important partner preference in the face of higher
COVID-19 concern, which was contrary to Alexopoulos et al.’s (in press) prediction,
alongside increases in family commitment and the importance of stability.
These are just a sampling of the interesting, exciting findings we are lucky enough to
engage with on a daily basis. We are thrilled and honored that Sage Publications is
offering the final versions of these studies as Open Access articles, so they will be widely
and feely available for scholars, students, members of the press, practitioners, and the
general public. Our ultimate goal is that these research findings will be translatable and
useful for the very audiences who our authors are studying: individuals in a variety of
personal relationships that are affected by COVID-19.
Where it’s headed
As we were writing this introduction, Jen found herself in a discussion with another
scholar in her discipline about the value of conducting COVID-19 research. This
interaction made Jen think about the importance of crafting a rationale for scholarship
focused on the pandemic beyond just the obvious claim that an unprecedented event such
as this is in need of study. Such a claim is necessary, of course, but certainly not suf-
ficient. Three additional justifications come to mind. First, as we stated in our call for
papers for this special issue, we hope that the body of scholarship that emerges here will
begin to assist researchers and practitioners as they work to understand the short- and
long-term implications of this significant relational event. Ultimately, as research on the
pandemic’s impact on personal relationships grows in depth and breadth, the patterns
that emerge can offer translational and practical applications for relational partners who
are continuing to struggle with the pandemic’s aftermath.
Second, lessons learned from this pandemic via personal relationship scholarship
such as what is published in this special issue can ideally be applied to the emergence of
other future crises related to health, climate, mass migration, natural disasters, and ter-
rorist attacks. These are each possible—and unfortunately, likely—at a global, national,
and/or local scale, and all have the potential to affect the trajectory of personal rela-
tionships. Prior research examples that bear this out include the September 11 terrorist
1756 Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38(6)
attacks in the United States (Cohan et al., 2009), lockdowns in Canada in response to
similar outbreaks of infectious diseases such as SARS (Hawryluck et al., 2004), the
California wildfires (Afifi et al., 2012), and the experiences of Palestinian refugees in
Lebanon (Afifi et al., 2016). If only we had the prescience to turn to this body of research
for a blueprint of coping mechanisms, buffers against uncertainty, resilience processes,
likelihood of relational continuation, and the psychological impacts of lockdown before
the COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps we could have better understood how personal rela-
tionships would be affected as the COVID-19 news broke.
Finally, it is imperative that we consider the unique personal relationship implications
of groups who are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 health disparities. For example,
Black patients were almost 3 times as likely as white patients to be hospitalized for
COVID-19 in California at the beginning of the pandemic (e.g., Azar et al., 2020).
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals have a higher prevalence of health conditions
such as asthma, stroke, and kidney disease that are associated with serious COVID-19
incidences compared with heterosexual people (Heslin & Hall, 2021). Worldwide, as of
April 2021, the United States, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union have
administered 70%of all COVID-19 vaccine doses, though they have less than half of the
world’s population; meanwhile, the lowest income countries have been unable to access
vaccine supplies due to funding and accessibility (McClellan et al., 2021). Cumulatively,
this lack of equity likely translates to a range of personal relationship challenges for
members of these groups. Understanding and untangling these effects both theoretically
and practically must be a priority for personal relationship researchers.
This special issue is still unfolding as we write this, much like the pandemic itself. As
U.S. citizens with doctoral degrees, we realize we are in a vantage point of incredible
privilege: we are both fully vaccinated, healthy, and remained employed and safe
throughout the pandemic. Our families are safe and healthy as well. But the fear and
helplessness we experienced in early 2020 was real, and we managed it the only ways we
knew at the time: by reaching out to our loved ones any way we could, caring for
ourselves, our students, and our colleagues, working harder (not necessarily better, at
least at first), and brainstorming ways to better understand how the pandemic could
affect personal relationships. This special issue is one small contribution toward that
latter goal. We hope you enjoy it, and can take something meaningful from it too.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
ORCID iD
Jennifer L. Bevan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-6269
Open research statement
As part of IARR’s encouragement of open research practices, the author(s) have provided the
following information: This research was not pre-registered. The data used in the research are not
available. The materials used in the research are not available.
Bevan and Lannutti 1757
References
Afifi, T. D., Afifi, W. A., Merrill, A. F., & Nimah, N. (2016). ‘Fractured communities’: Uncer-
tainty, stress, and (a lack of) communal coping in Palestinian refugee camps. Journal of
Applied Communication Research,44(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.
1225166
Afifi, W. A., Felix, E. D., & Afifi, T. D. (2012). The impact of uncertainty and communal coping
on mental health following natural disasters. Anxiety, Stress & Coping,25(3), 329–347. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.603048
Alexopoulos, C., Timmermans, E., Sharabi, L., Roache, D. L., Croft, A., Dorrance Hall, E.,
James-Hawkins, E., Lamarche, V., & Uhlich, M. (in press). Settling down without settling:
Perceived changes in partner preferences in response to COVID-19. Journal of Social and
Personal Relationships.
Azar, K., Shen, Z., Romanelli, R. J., Lockhart, S. H., Smits, K., Robinson, S., Brown, S., &
Pressman, A. R. (2020). Disparities in outcomes among COVID-19 patients in a large health
care system in California. Health Affairs,39(7), 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.
2020.00598
Cohan, C. L., Cole, S. W., & Schoen, R. (2009). Divorce following the September 11 terrorist
attacks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,26(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0265407509351043
Goodboy, A. K., Dillow, M. R., Knoster, K. C., & Howard, H. A. (2021). Relational turbulence
from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdepen-
dence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/
02654075211000135
Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004). SARS
control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging Infectious Dis-
eases,10(7), 1206–1212. https://doi:10.3201/eid1007.030703
Heslin, K. C., & Hall, J. E. (2021). Sexual orientation disparities in risk factors for adverse
COVID-19-related outcomes, by race/ethnicity—Behavioral risk factor surveillance system,
United States, 2017-2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,70(5), 149–154. https://doi.
org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7005a1
Li, Y., & Samp, J. A. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on same-sex couples’
conflict avoidance, relational quality, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211006199
Lillie, H. M., Chernichky-Karcher, S., & Venetis, M. (2021). Dyadic coping and discrete emotions
during COVID-19: Connecting the communication theory of resilience with relational uncer-
tainty. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/
02654075211009302
McClellan, M., Udayakumar, K., Merson, M., & Edson, G. (2021). Reducing global COVID
vaccine shortages: New research and recommendations for U.S. leadership. Duke University
Margolis Center for Health Policy. https://healthpolicy.duke.edu/sites/default/files/2021-04/
US%20Leadership%20for%20Global%20Vaccines_1.pdf
1758 Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38(6)
... The COVID-19 pandemic is a non-normative stressor that has impacted both individuals and intimate relationships (Bevan & Lannutti, 2021;Estlein et al., 2022;Lebow, 2020). During the height of the pandemic, US couples were more likely to experience increased relational conflict (Luetke et al., 2020), reduced sexual intimacy, and high rates of seeking alternative partners (Lehmiller et al., 2020;Gordon & Mitchell, 2020). ...
Article
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant upheaval for couples and families, particularly in terms of living arrangements. Emerging adults had to make quick decisions about where and with whom to shelter in place. In this grounded theory study, we explored how 22 young adults, predominantly living in the United States, navigated relationship decisions during the pandemic. The results suggest that participants were intentional about their choices, particularly in terms of moving in together (or not). The pandemic sometimes changed the timing of cohabitation or the pace of dating relationships; however, these decisions unfolded in tandem with common developmental tasks, such as college graduation and launching a career. More broadly, our findings suggest that participants’ responses to the pandemic both reflected core aspects of emerging adulthood (e.g., instability, feeling in-between) and also challenged them (e.g., other focus, limited exploration).
... Although research focusing exclusively on COVID-19 and personal relationships will naturally wane, we hope that a new research subarea that examines personal relationship processes during risk and crisis events will instead emerge. Future local, national, and/or global crises similar to COVID-19 are not only likely, but probable, and will impact close relationship trajectories (Bevan & Lannutti, 2021). Personal relationship researchers must be at the forefront of these global shifts to assist individuals with protecting the partnerships they depend upon the most. ...
Article
Full-text available
This in-depth critical review investigates the impact of COVID-19 on personal relationships from the start of the pandemic in early 2020 to September 2021. Research examining six themes are identified and described in detail: the impact of COVID-19 on (1) family and intimate relationships; (2) LGBTQ+ relationships; (3) how COVID-19 is linked to technologically mediated communication and personal relationships; (4) potential shifts in sexual behaviors and desire; (5) potential shifts in relational conflict and intimate partner violence; and (6) constructive aspects of personal relationships, which is a broad theme that includes outcomes such as resilience, relational quality, coping, and social support. Findings for overarching patterns are offered to highlight implications for current research and identify future directions to consider when continuing to study personal relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic and similar future crises.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This chapter introduces the reader to the Special Issue "Family Lives during the COVID-19 Pandemic in European Societies". Background: This Special Issue analyses how families, parents, and children have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and how they have been coping with its related challenges in different societal contexts. Method: The studies collected in this Special Issue are based on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and data that have been gathered during 2020 in a range of European countries. It covers the first lockdown period, the reopening phases, and the months thereafter. Results: The 20 contributions of this Special Issue show that families shouldered large responsibilities during the pandemic. While the pandemic did not lead to radical shifts in gendered care patterns, mothers and fathers experienced the pandemic differently, with mothers reporting higher levels of stress. Moreover, there was great heterogeneity in how different types of families and children were affected by the pandemic. Single parents and parents and children in low-income households were most strongly affected in their social and economic wellbeing. Social and economic distress are strongly interwoven, and the developments during the pandemic aggravated existing social disparities. Conclusion: This Special Issue underlines the importance of the family for the functioning of societies during times of crisis. It also shows that policy makers often adopted a too narrow view of what constitutes a family and did not adequately address family diversity in their decision making. This Special Issue furthermore emphasized that there is a danger that the pandemic will increase disparities between families. Thus, parents and their children need adequate support measures that are tailored to their needs, and that are designed to alleviate these social, economic and educational disparities.
Article
Framed by Wefulness Theory (WT; Nuru & Bruess, 2022), the present study explores the COVID-19 global pandemic as a context for examining relational struggle and strength during times of challenge. Analysis of in-depth, dyadic interviews with 54 couples who reflect a broad range of ethnic-racial compositions, partnership structures, sexual orientations, and ages rendered intelligible relational partners’ wefulness practices in situ. Results reveal four suprathemes: (a) cultivating relational consciousness, (b) negotiating wefulness amidst challenge, (c) accepting life on life’s terms, and (d) inviting challenge as opportunity for growth. Data reveal how relational partners engage in ritualized (re)commitments as multi-vocal practices of expressing and embracing the current pandemic moment. Data also evidenced WT is heuristically powerful in reconceptualizing and illuminating relational meaning- and sense-making.
Article
Full-text available
The current study applies the communication theory of resilience (CTR) to assess married individuals’ utilization of resilience communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines pathways between communicative resilience processes, relational uncertainty, discrete emotions, and evaluations of dyadic coping. Married individuals ( n = 625) were surveyed during April 21–April 29, 2020 using Qualtrics panels. Structural equation analyses revealed that most of the resilience communication processes impacted evaluations of dyadic coping via three indirect pathways, including (a) relational uncertainty, (b) relational uncertainty → anger, and (c) relational uncertainty → fear. The alternative logic of humor did not impact dyadic coping through these indirect pathways, but instead directly, positively impacted dyadic coping. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has seriously impacted the management and trajectory of same-sex relationships. This study considered the mediational role of same-sex partners’ conflict avoidance and the moderating roles of individual and contextual vulnerability factors in the face of the pandemic. Results showed that greater adverse daily life impacts and higher perceived threat of COVID-19 predicted more complaint avoidance, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction and higher anxiety, depression, and substance use. Being a person of color and having higher internalized homophobia exacerbated the pandemic’s negative effects on relationship satisfaction. While moving in with partners during the pandemic was related to more complaint avoidance, lower relational satisfaction, higher relationship termination intentions, and greater mental health risks, it also buffered the negative effects of the pandemic on relational well-being. Same-sex couples are encouraged to constructively solve relational issues and actively discuss moving in decisions. More efforts should be devoted to understanding multiple pandemic-related stressors facing same-sex couples.
Article
Full-text available
Relational turbulence theory posits that external changes to the relational environment compel romantic partners to navigate transitions by establishing new daily routines as interdependent couples. The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented transition fraught with difficult changes that have the potential to be especially disruptive to romantic partners’ daily routines as couples alter their patterns of interdependence and adapt their everyday lives. To study the pandemic’s effect as a relational transition, college students in romantic relationships ( N = 314) completed measures of partner facilitation and interference, negative emotions, and relational turbulence as they recalled what their relationships were like prior to the pandemic (January, 2020) and then reported on their relationships during the peak of the first wave of the pandemic in the U.S. (April, 2020). On average, negative emotions (i.e., anger, fear, sadness) toward interacting with partners and relational turbulence both increased from before to during the pandemic, and partner interference was positively correlated, whereas facilitation was inversely correlated, with negative emotions during the pandemic. Results of a within-subjects mediation model revealed that changes in relational turbulence were explained, in part, by a decrease in partner interdependence due to the pandemic. A direct effect of the pandemic on increases in relational turbulence was also discovered.
Article
Full-text available
Sexual minority persons experience health disparities associated with sexual stigma and discrimination and have a high prevalence of several health conditions that have been associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1,2). Current COVID-19 surveillance systems do not capture information about sexual orientation. To begin bridging the gap in knowledge about COVID-19 risk among sexual minority adults, CDC examined disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual adults in the prevalence of underlying conditions with strong or mixed evidence of associations with severe COVID-19-related illness (3), by using data from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).* When age, sex, and survey year are adjusted, sexual minority persons have higher prevalences than do heterosexual persons of self-reported cancer, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease (including myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary heart disease), obesity, smoking, diabetes, asthma, hypertension, and stroke. Sexual minority adults who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups disproportionately affected by the pandemic also have higher prevalences of several of these health conditions than do racial/ethnic minority adults who are heterosexual. Collecting data on sexual orientation in COVID-19 surveillance and other studies would improve knowledge about disparities in infection and adverse outcomes by sexual orientation, thereby informing more equitable responses to the pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined how communal coping reveals itself in Palestinian refugee camps and the conditions that promote or prevent its occurrence. Individual and dyadic interviews were conducted with 40 mothers and one of their adolescent children living in Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon. The results revealed that communal coping existed within the mother?adolescent dyad to a certain extent, but was rare within the larger context of the refugee camps. While families and neighbors did not typically verbalize their hardships and actively cope with them as a group, there was often an implicit recognition that they were all experiencing the same uncertainty and stress. Acting upon their uncertainty as a collective, however, was greatly hampered by mistrust within and outside the camps, due to widespread violence, privacy violations, vying for scarce resources, and disloyalty. Parents and adolescents also engaged in protective buffering whereby they attempted to reduce the stress of the family by keeping stress and fears to themselves rather than communicating about them. Even though protective buffering helped the refugees cope with chronic uncertainty and maintain a sense of normalcy, it prevented them from acting upon the problem as a group. Finally, parents emphasized that the child?s education provided hope for the future. Practical implications are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
We investigated the effect of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on marital stability. Previous research showed rates of divorce changed in opposite directions following natural disaster versus terrorist disaster. Using a prospective, longitudinal design and time series analysis, we examined rates of divorces filed by month, with respect to the World Trade Center attack in New York City (NYC). To examine whether effects radiated beyond NYC according to geographic proximity or psychological proximity, we examined four other counties of varying distance from NYC. Results showed geographic and psychological proximity effects. Following a major manmade disaster characterized by death, divorce rates decreased in NYC and Bergen County, NJ, geographically proximal locales, and in Los Angeles and Philadelphia, psychologically proximal locales.
Article
Full-text available
Feelings of uncertainty are a central feature of the disaster experience. Surprisingly, though, there is very little systematic quantitative research about the impact of uncertainty on disaster survivors. Moreover, communal coping has increasingly received attention as a potential buffer of the negative effects of stressors but that literature is also limited in its application to disasters. This investigation applies research in the domain of uncertainty, together with the Theoretical Model of Communal Coping to better understand the experience of a community exposed to three wildfires in a one year period. A random-digit dialing procedure was used to gather data from 402 individuals. Participants completed measures of mental health, uncertainty, and communal coping in the context of their experience with the most personally stressful of the three wildfires. All analyses were examined separately for those who were evacuated and those who were not. Results support the negative impact of uncertainty across both evacuated and nonevacuated sub-samples and show a strong buffering role for communal coping among those who evacuated. The implications of these findings for the understanding of wildfire survivors' experiences are noted and future directions are proposed.
Article
Full-text available
As a transmissible infectious disease, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was successfully contained globally by instituting widespread quarantine measures. Although these measures were successful in terminating the outbreak in all areas of the world, the adverse effects of quarantine have not previously been determined in a systematic manner. In this hypothesis-generating study supported by a convenience sample drawn in close temporal proximity to the period of quarantine, we examined the psychological effects of quarantine on persons in Toronto, Canada. The 129 quarantined persons who responded to a Web-based survey exhibited a high prevalence of psychological distress. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression were observed in 28.9% and 31.2% of respondents, respectively. Longer durations of quarantine were associated with an increased prevalence of PTSD symptoms. Acquaintance with or direct exposure to someone with a diagnosis of SARS was also associated with PTSD and depressive symptoms.
Article
The goal of this study was to explore the positive association between concern related to COVID-19 and single individuals’ perceived changes to their partner preferences. In addition, we investigated the mediating role of fear of being single. Results indicated that people with greater COVID-19 concern perceived an increase in the importance of stability, family commitment, and physical/social attractiveness, as well as fear of being single. Fear of being single only negatively predicted the importance of physical/social attractiveness, whereas it positively predicted the importance of stability and family commitment. Thus, in most cases, people with a greater concern for COVID-19 perceived themselves to become more selective, even when they exhibit higher levels of fear of being single.
Disparities in outcomes among COVID-19 patients in a large health care system in California
  • K Azar
  • Z Shen
  • R J Romanelli
  • S H Lockhart
  • K Smits
  • S Robinson
  • S Brown
  • A R Pressman
Azar, K., Shen, Z., Romanelli, R. J., Lockhart, S. H., Smits, K., Robinson, S., Brown, S., & Pressman, A. R. (2020). Disparities in outcomes among COVID-19 patients in a large health care system in California. Health Affairs, 39(7), 1253-1262. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff. 2020.00598