Conserving threatened beneficial
insects: bees, wasps and hoverflies in
UK silvoarable systems
Agroforestry for the transition towards
sustainability and bioeconomy
Tom Staton1, Richard J. Walters2, Jo Smith3, Tom D. Breeze4, Sian K. Davies4, Robbie D. Girling4
1 University of Reading, School of Agriculture, Policy & Development, UK, email@example.com
2 Lund University, Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Sweden
3 MV Agroecological Research Centre, Portugal
4 University of Reading, School of Agriculture, Policy & Development, UK
Theme: Agroforestry, biodiversity and wildlife management
Keywords: natural pest control, natural enemies, parasitoids, pollinators, pollination
Arable farming is facing increasing demand to improve productivity, but to do so in a sustainable manner,
including mitigating declines in global biodiversity. Silvoarable agroforestry systems have the potential to
be a ‘win-win’ solution. For example, these systems can enhance natural enemy and pollinator
abundances whilst suppressing pests, compared to arable (Staton et al. 2019).
The benefits of agroforestry systems are reasonably well understood for some taxonomic groups, such as
ground beetles and aphids. However, bees, wasps (including parasitoids) and hoverflies are relatively
poorly studied in agroforestry, despite their importance for the natural control of pests and pollination of
crops. Furthermore, bees and wasps are amongst the taxa most affected by insect declines globally
(Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys 2019). The aim of this study was therefore to assess whether agroforestry
systems could help conserve these threatened beneficial insects.
Our study sites comprised three working farms in England, all of which contained a silvoarable agroforestry
field and a monocropped arable field under the same management and rotation. Two farms were
organic, the third was conventional and minimum-till. Crop rotations were based around cereals, plus
oilseed rape at the conventional farm. Agroforestry alleys were 24 m wide, tree rows were 3-4 m wide and
principally comprised apple trees on MM106 rootstocks, planted between 2009 and 2015. Agroforestry
field sizes were approximately 5.6, 3.8 and 12 ha respectively at the three sites (the latter field set within a
52 ha agroforestry system), while the corresponding arable field sizes were 6.1, 3.0 and 7.6 ha respectively.
Sampling was undertaken in 2018 and 2019. At each site, two agroforestry alleys were selected for
sampling. Within these, 16 sampling points (eight in each alley including its adjacent tree rows) were
selected at set distances from the tree rows. This procedure was repeated in an arable field at each site,
to act as a control. At each point, a set of three UV-bright pan traps was deployed to capture flying
insects. Each trapping day lasted for at least five hours, and was repeated nine times over the two-year
period. All bees, wasps and hoverflies captured in the traps were assigned to taxonomic groups (Fig. 1).
Taxonomic richness and diversity (Shannon index) of bees, wasps and hoverflies collectively were
significantly higher in agroforestry than arable fields (mixed models, t=3.007, p-value=0.003; t=3.414, p-
value<0.001). Six of the taxonomic groups were significantly more abundant in agroforestry than arable
fields (Fig. 1). The strongest effects were seen for the two predatory wasp taxa. We hypothesise that social
wasps were attracted by apples in the tree rows, but could also aid biocontrol by hunting insect pests.
Two of the three parasitoid wasp taxa were significantly more abundant in agroforestry than arable fields.
However the braconid wasps were less abundant in the agroforestry fields. This effect was driven by an
early-season influx of braconids into the arable field at one site, possibly attracted by a high prey resource.
Tom Staton1, Richard J. Walters2, Jo Smith3, Tom D. Breeze4, Sian K. Davies4,
Robbie D. Girling4
Two of the five pollinator groups, comprising bumblebees and the small halictid bees, were significantly
more abundant in agroforestry than arable fields. This is consistent with a study in the UK showing higher
solitary bee abundance in agroforestry than monocultures, although in contrast to that study, we found
no significant difference for hoverfly abundance (Varah et al. 2020).
Our findings of benefits to bees, wasps and hoverflies could be explained by the higher availability of
flower and nesting resources in agroforestry tree rows compared to arable fields. Pan traps are less
effective in flower-dense areas (O’Connor et al. 2019), therefore, our results may underestimate the
benefits of agroforestry. In addition, field sizes were relatively small at two of the sites (3.8 and 5.6 ha), and
set within relatively diverse landscapes (particularly within a 2 km radius), which could allow insects to
rapidly colonise the arable fields from surrounding semi-natural habitat. Stronger effects could therefore
be predicted at larger-scale farms.
In conclusion, we find strong evidence for higher taxonomic richness and diversity of bees, wasps and
hoverflies, and abundance of predatory wasps and pollinators, in agroforestry compared to arable fields.
This suggests that agroforestry systems can play a role in the conservation of these threatened insects,
while improving the sustainability of agriculture by providing natural pest control and pollination services.
Figure 1. Abundances of bees, wasps and hoverflies in silvoarable agroforestry compared to arable controls. The
area above the dashed line represents higher values in agroforestry. Analysis was undertaken using negative
binomial mixed models in R software.
The study was funded by the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council and University of Reading. Thank
you to the farmers of the field sites for enthusiastically permitting access.
O’Connor RS, Kunin WE, Garratt MPD, Potts SG, Roy HE, Andrews C, Jones CM, Peyton JM, Savage J,
Harvey MC, Morris RKA, Roberts SPM, Wright I, Vanbergen AJ & Carvell C (2019) Monitoring insect
pollinators and flower visitation: The effectiveness and feasibility of different survey methods. Methods
Ecol Evol 10:2129–2140. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13292
Sánchez-Bayo F & Wyckhuys KAG (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers.
Biol Conserv 232:8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020
Staton T, Walters RJ, Smith J & Girling RD (2019) Evaluating the effects of integrating trees into temperate
arable systems on pest control and pollination. Agric Syst 176:102676.
Varah A, Jones H, Smith J & Potts SG (2020) Temperate agroforestry systems provide greater pollination
service than monoculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 301:107031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107031