ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Free access at: https://doi.org/10.4081/nhs.2021.520 This paper provides an updated overview, based on nomenclatural, taxonomical and distribution data, on the native and alien vascular flora of Italy, with details on the occurrence at national and regional administrative level. Recently described taxa occurring in Italy, which were not included in the checklists published in 2018, are listed. The list of extinct or possibly extinct native taxa and that of alien taxa of EU concern are updated. Rapporto 2020 sulla biodiversità vegetale in Italia: flora vascolare autoctona e alloctona. Viene presentato un rapporto sulla flora vascolare autoctona e alloctona del territorio italiano basato sugli ultimi aggiornamenti nomenclaturali, tassonomici e distributivi. Vengono forniti i numeri di dettaglio sulle presenze a livello nazionale e regionale. Inoltre sono elencati i taxa nuovi per la scienza presenti in Italia e non inclusi nelle checklist pubblicate nel 2018. Viene infine aggiornato l’elenco nazionale delle entità autoctone estinte o probabilmente estinte e delle entità aliene invasive di interesse unionale.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Natural History Sciences. Atti Soc. it. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano, 8 (1): 41-54, 2021 DOI: 10.4081/nhs.2021.520
Report 2020 on plant biodiversity in Italy: native and alien vascular ora
Fabrizio Bartolucci1, Gabriele Galasso2*, Lorenzo Peruzzi3, Fabio Conti1
1 Scuola di Bioscienze e Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli
Studi di Camerino; Centro Ricerche Floristiche dell’Appennino,
Parco Nazionale del Gran Sasso e Monti della Laga, San
Colombo, 67021 Barisciano (L’Aquila), Italia.
E-mail: fabrizio.bartolucci@gmail.com
fabio.conti@unicam.it
2 Sezione di Botanica, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso
Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italia.
3 Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Via
Derna 1, 56126, Pisa, Italia.
E-mail: lorenzo.peruzzi@unipi.it
* Corresponding author: gabriele.galasso@comune.milano.it
© 2021 Fabrizio Bartolucci, Gabriele Galasso, Lorenzo Peruzzi,
Fabio Conti
Received for publication: 5 March 2021
Accepted for publication: 17 April 2021
Online publication: 11 May 2021
Abstract - This paper provides an updated overview, based on
nomenclatural, taxonomical and distribution data, on the native and
alien vascular ora of Italy, with details on the occurrence at national
and regional administrative level. Recently described taxa occurring in
Italy, which were not included in the checklists published in 2018, are
listed. The list of extinct or possibly extinct native taxa and that of alien
taxa of EU concern are updated.
Key words: checklist, endemism, extinction, Mediterranean ora,
nomenclature, taxonomy.
Riassunto - Rapporto 2020 sulla biodiversità vegetale in Italia:
ora vascolare autoctona e alloctona.
Viene presentato un rapporto sulla ora vascolare autoctona e alloc-
tona del territorio italiano basato sugli ultimi aggiornamenti nomenclaturali,
tassonomici e distributivi. Vengono forniti i numeri di dettaglio sulle pre-
senze a livello nazionale e regionale. Inoltre sono elencati i taxa nuovi per
la scienza presenti in Italia e non inclusi nelle checklist pubblicate nel 2018.
Viene inne aggiornato l’elenco nazionale delle entità autoctone estinte o
probabilmente estinte e delle entità aliene invasive di interesse unionale.
Parole chiave: checklist, endemismo, estinzione, ora mediterra-
nea, nomenclatura, tassonomia.
INTRODUCTION
After the publication of the two checklists of the native
and alien vascular ora of Italy (Bartolucci et al., 2018a;
Galasso et al., 2018a), several oristic, systematic and ta-
xonomic studies were published. Most of the new oristic
records (based on herbarium specimens kept in Natural
History Museum of Florence -FI- and in other public her-
baria) concerning the distribution of the Italian vascular
ora are published in the series “Notulae to the Italian nati-
ve vascular Flora” (Bartolucci et al., 2018b, 2018c, 2019a,
2019b, 2020a, 2020b) and “Notulae to the Italian alien va-
scular Flora” (Galasso et al., 2018b, 2018c, 2019a, 2019b,
2020b, 2020c). These series also include nomenclatural,
taxonomical and distribution updates published elsewhere,
and corrigenda to the published checklists (as supplemen-
tary material). After the publication of the checklists, the
data were organized into the information system “FlorI-
taly - Portal to the Flora of Italy” (Galasso et al., 2020a;
Martellos et al., 2020), which is accessible online at the
address http://dryades.units.it/oritaly. FlorItaly is upda-
ted every six months with data coming from the Notulae.
The aim of this contribution is to provide an updated
overview on systematics, taxonomy and distribution (at
national and administrative regional level) of the native
and alien vascular ora of Italy, ca. three years after the
publication of the Italian checklists.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The circumscription of families follows Bartolucci et al.
(2018a) and Galasso et al. (2018a). The data also include apo-
mictic taxa belonging to Alchemilla and Rubus (Rosaceae),
Hieracium, Pilosella, and Taraxacum (Asteraceae), and the
Ranunculus auricomus group (Ranunculaceae). Taxa at va-
rietal rank were not considered. Hybrids are included only for
the alien vascular ora. For Italian endemic taxa, we referred
to the inventory proposed by Peruzzi et al. (2014), which is
continuously updated (see http://goo.gl/x8QL4J), and to Bar-
tolucci et al. (2018a). Following these authors, the “Italian
endemic” status was attributed to those that occur only in
Italy, or in Italy and Corse (France), or in Italy and Malta.
The distribution is given as presence/absence in each
of the 20 administrative regions of Italy (not considering
the two enclave-countries Republic of San Marino and
Vatican City State), which are coded as follows: Valle
d’Aosta, VDA; Piemonte, PIE; Lombardia, LOM; Tren-
tino-Alto Adige, TAA; Veneto, VEN; Friuli Venezia Giu-
lia, FVG; Liguria, LIG; Emilia-Romagna, EMR; Toscana,
42
TOS; Marche, MAR; Umbria, UMB; Lazio, LAZ; Abruz-
zo, ABR; Molise, MOL; Puglia, PUG; Campania, CAM;
Basilicata, BAS; Calabria, CAL; Sicilia, SIC; Sardegna,
SAR. For each region, the occurrence status of each taxon
is provided, according the categories proposed by Barto-
lucci et al. (2018a) and Galasso et al. (2018a).
RESULTS
To date (end of 2020, FlorItaly version 2020.2), the
Italian native and alien vascular ora consists of 9,897
taxa (including casual alien plants), belonging to 1,547
genera and 198 families (Tab. 1).
The native vascular ora consists of 8,237 taxa (6,461
species and 1,776 subspecies) belonging to 1,103 gene-
ra and 153 families. The most represented families (≥ 50
taxa) and genera (≥ 40 taxa) are reported in Table 2. The
taxa endemic to Italy are 1,727, grouped in 318 genera
and 70 families (Tabs. 3, 4). Among them, the taxa cer-
tainly occurring in Italy are 1,594 (P), while 119 taxa have
not been conrmed in recent times (NC), 1 is doubtfully
occurring (Paeonia corsica Sieber ex Tausch, occurring
in Corse and doubtfully in Sardegna, D) and 13 are con-
sidered extinct or possibly extinct (EX) (Tabs. 4, 7). Four
genera are narrowly endemic to Italy: Eokochia (Cheno-
podiaceae), Rhizobotrya (Brassicaceae), Petagnaea, and
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
Tab. 1 - Number of native and alien taxa occurring in each of the 20 administrative regions in 2020. Native: N+C
(native + cryptogenic); N+C+A REG [NAT, INV] (native + cryptogenic + regionally non-native [naturalized,
invasive]); N+C+A REG [CAS, NAT, INV] (native + cryptogenic + regionally non-native [casual, naturalized,
invasive]); Alien: ARC (archaeophyte, casual aliens included); NEO (neophyte, casual aliens included);
ARC ESTABL. (archaeophyte, casual aliens excluded); NEO ESTABL. (neophyte, casual aliens excluded).
/ Numero dei taxa nativi e alieni presenti nel 2020 in ognuna delle 20 regioni amministrative. Nativi: N+C
(nativi + criptogenici); N+C+A REG [NAT, INV] (nativi + criptogenici + alieni regionali [naturalizzati,
invasivi]); N+C+A REG [CAS, NAT, INV] (nativi + criptogenici + alieni regionali [casuali, naturalizzati,
invasivi]); Alieni: ARC (archeote, inclusi gli alieni casuali); NEO (neote, inclusi gli alieni casuali); ARC
ESTABL. (archeote, esclusi gli alieni casuali); NEO ESTABL. (neote, esclusi gli alieni casuali).
NUMBER OF TAXA (2020)
NATIVE ALIEN NATIVE + ALIEN
N+C
N+C+
A REG
[NAT, INV]
N+C+
A REG
[CAS, NAT, INV]
ARC
ESTABL.
[NAT, INV]
NEO
ESTABL.
[NAT, INV]
ARC
[CAS, NAT, INV]
NEO
[CAS, NAT, INV]
ARC+NEO
ESTABL.
[NAT, INV]
ARC+NEO
[CAS, NAT, INV]
TOTAL
(casual excluded)
TOTAL
(casual included)
PIE 3,479 3,525 3,554 36 273 98 449 309 547 3,834 4,101
TOS 3,424 3,445 3,458 38 243 124 520 282 644 3,726 4,102
LOM 3,286 3,322 3,452 43 323 127 663 366 790 3,688 4,242
ABR 3,206 3,224 3,235 39 117 105 264 156 369 3,380 3,604
VEN 3,181 3,281 3,360 36 221 112 531 257 643 3,538 4,003
TAA 3,119 3,241 3,506 22 157 108 484 179 592 3,420 4,098
LAZ 3,038 3,065 3,085 36 139 98 410 175 508 3,240 3,593
LIG 3,018 3,067 3,097 26 141 81 397 167 478 3,234 3,575
FVG 2,987 3,141 3,158 38 155 100 408 193 508 3,334 3,666
CAM 2,835 2,849 2,852 38 143 99 347 181 446 3,030 3,298
EMR 2,815 2,845 2,861 33 219 115 442 252 557 3,097 3,418
CAL 2,786 2,805 2,816 25 118 74 268 143 342 2,948 3,158
SIC 2,764 2,783 2,789 34 194 85 388 218 473 3,001 3,262
BAS 2,631 2,638 2,641 27 67 84 153 94 237 2,732 2,878
PUG 2,554 2,569 2,578 27 110 81 303 137 384 2,706 2,962
MAR 2,520 2,558 2,565 30 110 98 283 140 381 2,698 2,946
UMB 2,372 2,408 2,415 24 60 97 197 84 294 2,492 2,709
SAR 2,327 2,406 2,462 35 165 108 393 200 501 2,606 2,963
MOL 2,314 2,334 2,337 32 61 69 119 93 188 2,427 2,525
VDA 2,298 2,332 2,344 13 60 37 126 73 163 2,405 2,507
ITA 8,237 (56 C) 8,237 8,237 85 735 160 1,500 820 1,660 9,057 9,897
43
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
Siculosciadium (Apiaceae). Three genera are endemic to
Sardegna and Corse (France): Morisia (Brassicaceae),
Castroviejoa, and Nananthea (Asteraceae). The most
represented families (≥ 20 taxa) and genera (≥ 15 taxa)
concerning Italian endemics are reported in Table 3. The
administrative regions showing the highest number of Ita-
lian endemics (Tab. 5), are: SIC (424), SAR (319), CAL
(300), ABR (299), BAS (240), and TOS (227). The nati-
ve taxa certainly occurring in Italy are 7,528 (P), while
564 taxa have not been conrmed in recent times (NC),
99 are doubtfully occurring (D), and 18 are data decient
(DD) (Tabs. 6, 10). Out of the not conrmed taxa, 28 are
considered extinct or possibly extinct (Tab. 7, Fig. 1). In
Tab. 2 - Most represented families of the Italian vascular ora in 2020: Native: (≥ 50 taxa) and genera (≥ 40
taxa); Alien: (≥ 25 taxa) and genera (≥ 10 taxa). / Famiglie (Native: ≥ 50 taxa; Aliene: ≥ 25 taxa) e generi
(Nativi: ≥ 40 taxa; Alieni: ≥ 10 taxa) maggiormente rappresentati nel 2020 nella ora vascolare italiana.
Native Alien
Families Genera Families Genera
Asteraceae 2,219 Hieracium 1,172 Poaceae 170 Amaranthus 30
Poaceae 554 Taraxacum 162 Asteraceae 168 Oenothera 29
Fabaceae 502 Carex 126 Fabaceae 79 Opuntia 22
Caryophyllaceae 359 Centaurea 119 Rosaceae 74 Solanum 22
Brassicaceae 333 Limonium 112 Solanaceae 60 Cyperus 21
Rosaceae 317 Ranunculus 110 Asparagaceae 47 Euphorbia 18
Apiaceae 262 Ophrys 104 Brassicaceae 45 Centaurea 16
Orchidaceae 242 Pilosella 100 Cactaceae 39 Avena 13
Lamiaceae 239 Alchemilla 97 Amaranthaceae 38 Bidens 13
Ranunculaceae 231 Silene 86 Lamiaceae 38 Eucalyptus 13
Cyperaceae 188 Festuca 81 Onagraceae 34 Oxalis 13
Plantaginaceae 163 Trifolium 81 Polygonaceae 32 Triticum 13
Orobanchaceae 142 Allium 69 Crassulaceae 30 Phyllostachys 12
Plumbaginaceae 136 Saxifraga 65 Cyperaceae 30 Rosa 12
Boraginaceae 115 Euphorbia 62 Amaryllidaceae 26 Salvia 11
Campanulaceae 98 Galium 59 Iridaceae 26 Symphyotrichum 11
Rubiaceae 95 Campanula 58 Cotoneaster 10
Amaryllidaceae 93 Viola 57 Vitis 10
Primulaceae 81 Vicia 55
Asparagaceae 76 Dianthus 54
Juncaceae 70 Genista 49
Gentianaceae 68 Astragalus 45
Saxifragaceae 68 Potentilla 45
Euphorbiaceae 67 Veronica 44
Chenopodiaceae 63 Crepis 43
Crassulaceae 63 Salix 43
Dipsacaceae 62 Rosa 42
Polygonaceae 60 Rubus 41
Iridaceae 58 Cerastium 40
Violaceae 57 Juncus 40
Cistaceae 55 Orobanche 40
addition, the taxa recorded by mistake at national level
are 195. The administrative regions with the highest num-
ber of native taxa (Tab. 1), also considering the regional-
ly non-native (casual, CAS; naturalized, NAT; invasive,
INV) taxa, are: PIE (3,554), TAA (3,506), TOS (3,458),
LOM (3,452), VEN (3,360), and ABR (3,235). By exclu-
ding the regionally non-native taxa (CAS, NAT, INV), the
regions with the highest number of taxa are: PIE (3,479),
TOS (3,424), LOM (3,286), ABR (3,206), VEN (3,181),
and TAA (3,119). Cryptogenic taxa are 56, while 433 taxa
are taxonomically doubtful (Tabs. 6, 10). The increase in
the number of taxa from 2018 at regional level is showed
in Table 12.
44
Fig. 1 - Hieracium tolstoii Fen. & Zahn. Endemic to Italy, recognized as extinct in 2019. / Specie endemica italiana dichiarata estinta
nel 2019 (FI051948; Scan / Scansione: Erbario dell’Università di Firenze).
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
45
The alien vascular ora consists of 1,660 taxa (1,574
species, 32 subspecies, and 54 hybrids), i.e. 16.16% of the
total Italian ora, belonging to 741 genera and 154 fami-
lies. The most represented families (≥ 25 taxa) and gene-
ra (≥ 10 taxa) are reported in Table 2. The taxa currently
established (NAT + INV) in Italy are 820 (593 NAT and
227 INV), while 744 are casual (CAS), 3 are not asses-
sed (CAS?, possibly casual), 5 are data decient (DD A,
unknown regional distribution, possibly casual), 48 have
not been conrmed in recent times (NC A), 3 are possibly
(locally) extinct (Plantago patagonica Jacq., Sagittaria
platyphylla (Engelm.) J.G.Sm., and Themeda triandra
Forssk.), and 37 are doubtfully occurring in the country
(D A) (Tabs. 8, 10). The number of taxa recorded by mi-
stake (NP) is 99 (Tab. 10). Looking at the taxa involved
in past domestication processes, 107 taxa are culta, 54 are
ferals, while 1 additional taxon is regarded as doubtfully
culton. The Italian alien ora includes 1,500 neophytes
and 160 archaeophytes (Tab. 1). Twenty alien species of
EU concern (Regulation (EU) 1143/2014 concerning In-
vasive Alien Species, Commission Implementing Regula-
tions (EU) 2016/1141, 2017/1263 and 2019/1262) occur
in Italy, of which 16 are invasive at national level, 3 are
considered as naturalized, while 1 is not conrmed in re-
cent times (Tab. 9). The administrative regions with the
highest number of alien taxa are LOM (790, of which 366
established), TOS (644, of which 282 established), VEN
(643, of which 257 established), TAA (592, of which 179
established), EMR (547, of which 252 established), and
PIE (547, of which 309 established) (Tab. 1). The incre-
ase in the number of taxa from 2018 at regional level is
showed in Table 13.
Tab. 3 - Most represented families (≥ 20 taxa) and genera
(≥ 15 taxa) of the Italian endemic vascular ora in 2020. /
Famiglie (≥ 20 taxa) e generi (≥ 15 taxa) maggiormente rap-
presentati nel 2020 nella ora vascolare endemica italiana.
Families Genera
Asteraceae 589 Hieracium 340
Plumbaginaceae 119 Limonium 101
Caryophyllaceae 97 Centaurea 76
Orchidaceae 92 Ophrys 60
Fabaceae 86 Genista 33
Brassicaceae 78 Ranunculus 33
Poaceae 66 Taraxacum 32
Ranunculaceae 56 Silene 29
Rosaceae 43 Dianthus 28
Apiaceae 38 Allium 25
Lamiaceae 36 Viola 21
Boraginaceae 33 Campanula 20
Amaryllidaceae 29 Epipactis 20
Campanulaceae 27 Armeria 17
Rubiaceae 27 Festuca 17
Plantaginaceae 24 Astragalus 16
Iridaceae 23 Erysimum 16
Violaceae 21 Saxifraga 16
Orobanchaceae 20 Alchemilla 15
Pilosella 15
Tab. 4 - Number of Italian endemic taxa for selected occurrence category in the 20 administrative regions
in 2020. Occurring: “P”; doubtfully occurring: “D”; no longer recorded (reliable historical record): “NC”;
extinct or possibly extinct: “EX”; cryptogenic: “C”. / Numero dei taxa endemici italiani presenti nel 2020 in
ognuna delle 20 regioni amministrative, suddivisi per categoria di presenza. Presenti: “P”; conosciuti soltanto
per record dubbi: “D”; conosciuti soltanto per record storici afdabili: “NC”; estinti o presumibilmente
estinti: “EX”; criptogenici: “C”.
VDA
PIE
LOM
TAA
VEN
FVG
LIG
EMR
TOS
MAR
UMB
LAZ
ABR
MOL
CAM
PUG
BAS
CAL
SIC
SAR
ITA
P12 88 75 95 72 43 66 88 213 160 115 205 278 136 185 148 225 277 407 314 1,594
NC 13 48 27 24 14 12 7 4 5 4 2 8 5 1 17 11 4761119
D0 2 1 2 4 1 1 5 4 6 13 7 15 7 8 14 11 12 6 3 1
EX 0070101140000003045113
P C 000000001000100100000
TOT 25 138 110 121 91 56 75 98 227 170 130 220 299 144 210 177 240 300 424 319 1,727
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
46
Tab. 6 - Number of native taxa for each occurrence category in the 20 administrative regions in 2020.
Occurring: “P”; doubtfully occurring: “D”; no longer recorded (reliable historical record): “NC”; extinct or
possibly extinct: “EX”; recorded by mistake: “NP”; cryptogenic: “C”; data decent: “DD”; alien at regional
level: “A” [“CAS” (Casual), “NAT” (Naturalized), “INV” (Invasive)]. / Numero dei taxa nativi presenti
nel 2020 in ognuna delle 20 regioni amministrative, suddivisi per categoria di presenza. Presenti: “P”;
conosciuti soltanto per record dubbi: “D”; conosciuti soltanto per record storici afdabili: “NC”; estinti o
presumibilmente estinti: “EX”; riportati per errore: “NP”; criptogenici: “C”; carenti di dati: “DD”; alieni a
livello regionale: “A” [“CAS” (Casuali), “NAT” (Naturalizzati), “INV” (Invasivi)].
Tab. 5 - Number of Italian endemic taxa in the 20 administrative regions in 2020. / Numero dei taxa endemici
italiani presenti nel 2020 in ognuna delle 20 regioni amministrative.
SIC
SAR
CAL
ABR
BAS
TOS
LAZ
CAM
PUG
MAR
MOL
PIE
UMB
TAA
LOM
EMR
VEN
LIG
FVG
VDA
424 319 300 299 240 227 220 210 177 170 144 138 130 121 110 98 91 75 56 25
DISCUSSION
The native plants of Italy amount to 8,237 species and
subspecies, including 56 cryptogenic taxa. This number
consolidates the primacy in Europe already highlighted
by Bartolucci et al. (2018a), Italy being the European
country that hosts the highest number of native plants.
The increase recorded since March 2018 (Bartolucci et
al. 2018a) to December 2020 consists of 42 taxa (0.51%),
with consistent variation among administrative regions
(Tab. 12). Some have an increase rate greater than 1%,
such as e.g. TOS (1.60%), BAS (1.35%), and LAZ
P NC D EX P C NC
CD C EX
CP A P A
CAS
P A
NAT
P A
INV
NC
A D A EX
ADD TOT NP
VDA 1,764 245 233 10 37 7 1 1 0 12 22 0 7 0 5 0 2,344 283
PIE 2,995 355 86 18 24 1 0 0 0 29 36 0 6 2 2 0 3,554 289
LOM 2,907 196 67 98 14 3 0 1 1 130 27 4 0 4 0 0 3,452 315
TAA 2,752 233 79 32 20 2 1 0 7 265 90 3 3 19 0 0 3,506 175
VEN 2,803 216 140 7 14 1 0 0 26 79 64 1 7 2 0 0 3,360 162
FVG 2,754 160 59 4 10 0 0 0 67 17 82 0 4 1 0 0 3,158 141
LIG 2,604 290 100 6 16 0 2 0 2 30 28 0 19 0 0 0 3,097 212
EMR 2,570 111 74 34 22 0 3 1 1 16 23 1 4 1 0 0 2,861 120
TOS 3,161 72 140 18 30 1 2 0 1 13 16 0 2 2 0 0 3,458 234
MAR 2,319 79 85 16 19 0 2 0 8 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 2,565 124
UMB 2,071 21 262 0 17 0 1 0 13 7 20 0 1 2 0 0 2,415 189
LAZ 2,833 99 80 3 21 2 0 0 0 20 21 1 4 1 0 0 3,085 159
ABR 2,896 96 162 26 20 2 3 1 1 11 17 0 0 0 0 0 3,235 331
MOL 2,189 3 106 0 15 0 1 0 3 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 2,337 53
CAM 2,412 282 109 3 23 3 2 1 0 3 11 1 1 1 0 0 2,852 122
PUG 2,202 140 168 8 34 0 1 1 0 9 9 0 4 2 0 0 2,578 202
BAS 2,489 21 98 2 18 1 1 1 0 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 2,641 80
CAL 2,489 76 197 5 13 1 4 1 3 11 15 0 0 1 0 0 2,816 142
SIC 2,574 69 78 8 31 2 2 0 5 6 10 0 3 1 0 0 2,789 210
SAR 2,213 21 58 1 33 0 1 0 0 56 71 5 1 2 0 0 2,462 94
ITA 7,528 564 99 28 54 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 8,237 195
(1.16%). The increase at national level is mostly due to
the 31 newly described taxa (including the validation of
the name Ulmus minor subsp. canescens Bartolucci &
Galasso), in most cases Italian endemics (Tab. 11). This
increase documents the good state of oristic research in
Italy. In 2018 (from March to December), 3 new vascular
plants were described from Italy (e.g. Fig. 2B), 19 taxa in
2019, and 9 taxa in 2020 (e.g. Fig. 2A). Most of them be-
long to taxonomically critical genera such as Epipactis (5
species), Genista (1 species and 2 subspecies), Hieracium
(3 subspecies), and Rubus (2 species).
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
47
Fig. 2 - A) Poa magellensis F.Conti & Bartolucci. Endemic to Italy, described in 2020. / Specie endemica italiana descritta nel 2020.
(Photo: / Foto: Fabrizio Bartolucci). B) Gymnospermium scipetarum Paparisto & Qosja ex E.Mayer & Pulević subsp. eddae Rosati,
Farris, Fascetti & Selvi. Endemic to Italy, described in 2018. / Sottospecie endemica italiana descritta nel 2018. (Photo: / Foto: Leon-
ardo Rosati).
A
B
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
48
Tab. 7 - List of extinct or possibly extinct native taxa; 2020 data. In bold, taxa not considered as extinct by
Bartolucci et al. (2018a). / Elenco dei taxa nativi estinti o presumibilmente estinti; dati del 2020. In grassetto
quelli non considerati estinti da Bartolucci et al. (2018a).
Family Italian endemic Taxon
Droseraceae Aldrovanda vesiculosa L.
Fabaceae E Anthyllis hermanniae L. subsp. corsica Brullo & Giusso
Fabaceae E Anthyllis hermanniae L. subsp. sicula Brullo & Giusso
Poaceae Bromus grossus Desf. ex DC.
Cyperaceae Bulbostylis cioniana (Pi.Savi) Lye
Alismataceae Caldesia parnassifolia (Bassi) Parl.
Brassicaceae Camelina alyssum (Mill.) Thell. subsp. alyssum
Cyperaceae Carex pediformis C.A.Mey. subsp. pediformis
Asteraceae Carlina acanthifolia All. subsp. utzka (Hacq.) Meusel & Kästner
Asteraceae E Castroviejoa frigida (Labill.) Galbany, L.Sáez & Benedí
Ranunculaceae Clematis integrifolia L.
Asteraceae Crepis mollis (Jacq.) Asch. subsp. mollis
Cistaceae Helianthemum syriacum (Jacq.) Dum.Cours. subsp. thibaudii (Pers.) Meikle
Apiaceae Helosciadium repens (Jacq.) W.D.J.Koch
Caryophyllaceae E Herniaria fontanesii Gay subsp. empedocleana (Lojac.) Brullo
Asteraceae E Hieracium tolstoii Fen. & Zahn (Fig. 1)
Asteraceae Launaea nudicaulis (L.) Hook.f.
Plumbaginaceae E Limonium catanense (Tineo ex Lojac.) Brullo
Plumbaginaceae E Limonium intermedium (Guss.) Brullo
Plumbaginaceae E Limonium peucetium Pignatti
Ranunculaceae E Ranunculus orii Pignatti
Ranunculaceae E Ranunculus fraelensis Dunkel
Ranunculaceae E Ranunculus hostiliensis Pignatti
Ranunculaceae Ranunculus monspeliacus L. subsp. saxatilis Nyman
Ranunculaceae E Ranunculus mutinensis Pignatti
Asteraceae Sonchus palustris L.
Hydrocharitaceae Stratiotes aloides L.
Chenopodiaceae E Suaeda kocheri Guss. ex C.Brullo, Brullo & Giusso
Tab. 8 - Number of alien taxa for each occurrence category in the 20 administrative regions in 2020. Casual
aliens: “CAS”; undened status, likely casual aliens: “CAS?”; naturalized aliens: “NAT”; invasive aliens:
“INV”; no longer recorded aliens: “NC A”; extinct or possibly extinct (in Italy) aliens: “EX A”; doubtfully
occurring aliens: “D A”; data decent aliens: “DD A”; recorded by mistake aliens: “NP”; alien taxa of Union
concern: “IAS”. / Numero dei taxa alieni presenti nel 2020 in ognuna delle 20 regioni amministrative, suddivisi
per categoria di presenza. Alieni casuali: “CAS”; alieni con status non noto, presumibilmente casuali: “CAS?”;
alieni naturalizzati: “NAT”; alieni invasivi: “INV”; alieni conosciuti soltanto per record storici afdabili: “NC
A”; alieni estinti o presumibilmente estinti (in Italia): “EX A”; alieni conosciuti soltanto per record dubbi: “D
A”; alieni carenti di dati: “DD A”; alieni riportati per errore: “NP”; taxa alieni di interesse unionale: “IAS”.
VDA
PIE
LOM
TAA
VEN
FVG
LIG
EMR
TOS
MAR
UMB
LAZ
ABR
MOL
CAM
PUG
BAS
CAL
SIC
SAR
ITA
CAS 71 196 408 385 343 271 268 262 292 208 187 304 205 89 218 225 130 177 206 276 744
NAT 52 241 254 139 189 156 148 225 222 91 72 136 122 67 135 116 74 109 210 137 593
INV 21 68 112 40 68 37 19 27 60 40 12 39 34 26 47 21 20 35 18 63 227
CAS? 1107610011 768102004354 3
NC A 8 15 1 4 28 18 33 18 35 28 2 17 4 0 33 13 3 16 18 2 48
D A 10 12 10 15 9 16 10 8 27 8 13 11 4 4 13 9 6 2 16 19 37
EX A 014520006100000000000 3
DD A 00000000000000000000 5
TOT 163 547 790 592 643 508 478 557 644 381 294 508 369 188 446 384 237 342 473 501 1,660
IAS 3 10 14 8 13 8 5 10 13 2 1 10 1 2 5 4 3 4 6 6 20
NP 7 46 69 27 21 15 30 23 41 11 10 22 16 8 33 16 6 17 26 20 99
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
49
Tab. 9 - Alien taxa of Union concern in compliance with Regulation (EU) 1143/2014, Commission Implementing
Regulations (EU) 2016/1141, 2017/1263, and 2019/1262. New regional records after Galasso et al. (2018a)
are reported. / Taxa alieni di interesse unionale in base al Regolamento (UE) 1143/2014 e ai Regolamenti
di esecuzione della Commissione (UE) 2016/1141, 2017/1263 e 2019/1262. Vengono evidenziate le nuove
segnalazioni regionali successive a Galasso et al. (2018a).
Family Taxon New regional
records
Status ITA
Fabaceae Acacia saligna (Labill.) H.L.Wendl. INV
Simaroubaceae Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle INV
Amaranthaceae Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. INV
Apocynaceae Asclepias syriaca L. NAT
Asteraceae Baccharis halimifolia L. INV
Sapindaceae Cardiospermum grandiorum Sw. NAT
Poaceae Cenchrus setaceus (Forssk.) Morrone CAS TOS, INV CAL INV
Hydrocharitaceae Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H.St.John INV
Asteraceae Gymnocoronis spilanthoides (D.Don ex Hook. & Arn.) DC. NAT
Apiaceae Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier INV
Cannabaceae Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc. INV
Araliaceae Hydrocotyle ranunculoides L.f. INV
Balsaminaceae Impatiens glandulifera Royle INV
Hydrocharitaceae Lagarosiphon major (Ridl.) Moss INV
Onagraceae Ludwigia hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Zardini, H.Y.Gu & P.H.Raven NAT LAZ INV
Onagraceae Ludwigia peploides (Kunth) P.H.Raven subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) P.H.Raven INV
Haloragaceae Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. CAS FVG, INV TOS INV
Pontederiaceae Pontederia crassipes Mart. INV
Fabaceae Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi INV
Salviniaceae Salvinia molesta D.S.Mitch. Not conrmed
Tab. 10 - Comparison between data at national level updated to 2020 and those reported by Bartolucci et
al. (2018a) and Galasso et al. (2018a). Taxonomically doubtful taxa: “T”. / Confronto a livello nazionale
tra i dati aggiornati al 2020 e quelli riportati da Bartolucci et al. (2018a) e Galasso et al. (2018a). Taxa
tassonomicamente dubbi: “T”.
Native Alien
ITA (Bartolucci et al. 2018a) ITA (2020) ITA (Galasso et al. 2018a) ITA (2020)
P 7,483 7,528 CAS 705 744
NC 568 564 NAT 570 593
D 99 99 INV 221 227
EX 26 28 CAS? 4 3
P C 53 54 NC A 47 48
NC C 2 2D A 40 37
DD 19 18 EX A 3 3
NP 177 195 DD A 7 5
T 430 433 NP 86 99
T 26 28
TOT 8,195 8,237 1,597 1,660
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
50
Tab. 11 - New taxa described between March 2018 and December 2020, not included in Bartolucci et al.
(2018a) and Galasso et al. (2018a). Endemic: “E”; alien: “A”. / Nuovi taxa descritti tra marzo 2018 e dicembre
2020, non inclusi in Bartolucci et al. (2018a) e Galasso et al. (2018a). Endemici: “E”; alieni: “A”.
Family E A Taxon References
Rosaceae E Alchemilla gretae-gregorii S.E.Fröhner & Prosser Fröhner & Prosser (2019)
Brassicaceae E Alyssum rossetii Španiel, Bovio & K.Kaplan Španiel et al. (2018)
Orchidaceae E Anacamptis berica Doro Doro (2020)
Brassicaceae Arabidopsis halleri (L.) O’Kane & Al-Shehbaz subsp. occidentalis Šrámková &
Marhold
Šrámková et al. (2019)
Chenopodiaceae Arthrocaulon meridionale Es.Ramírez, Rufo, Sánchez Mata, V.Fuente Ramírez et al. (2019)
Brassicaceae E Brassica tardarae Ilardi, Geraci & Troìa Ilardi et al. (2020)
Asteraceae E Centaurea akroteriensis Gennaio & Q.G.Manni Gennaio & Manni (2020)
Asteraceae E Centaurea heywoodiana Raimondo, Spadaro & Di Grist. Raimondo et al. (2020)
Papaveraceae E Corydalis densiora C.Presl subsp. apennina F.Conti, Bartolucci & Uzunov Conti et al. (2019)
Plantaginaceae E Cymbalaria mulleri (Moris) A.Chev. subsp. villosa Carnicero Carnicero et al. (2019)
Orchidaceae E Epipactis cordigera S.Hertel & Presser Hertel & Presser (2019)
Orchidaceae E Epipactis garganica S.Hertel Hertel & Presser (2019)
Orchidaceae E Epipactis hygrophila S.Hertel Hertel & Presser (2019)
Orchidaceae E Epipactis majellensis Presser & S.Hertel Hertel & Presser (2019)
Orchidaceae E Epipactis torqueta Presser, S.Hertel & V.A.Romano Hertel & Presser (2019)
Fabaceae E Genista desoleana Vals. subsp. martellii Bacch., Brullo & Giusso Bacchetta et al. (2020)
Fabaceae E Genista nuragica Bacch., Brullo & Giusso Bacchetta et al. (2020)
Fabaceae E Genista salzmannii DC. subsp. limbarae Bacch., Brullo & Giusso Bacchetta et al. (2020)
Poaceae Glyceria spicata Guss. subsp. onubensis J.López & Devesa López & Devesa (2019)
Berberidaceae E Gymnospermium scipetarum Paparisto & Qosja ex E.Mayer & Pulević subsp. eddae
Rosati, Farris, Fascetti & Selvi (Fig. 2B)
Rosati et al. (2018)
Asteraceae Hieracium atratum Fr. subsp. pergrandifrons Zahn ex Gottschl. Gottschlich (2019)
Asteraceae E Hieracium racemosum Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. subsp. amideii Gottschl., Gonnelli &
Zoccola
Gonnelli et al. (2019)
Asteraceae E Hieracium racemosum Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. subsp. lucanum Di Grist., Domina,
Gottschl. & Scadi
Di Gristina et al. (2019)
Poaceae E Poa magellensis F.Conti & Bartolucci (Fig. 2A) Conti et al. (2020)
Rosaceae Rubus maureri Király, Trávn. & Žíla Király et al. (2019)
Rosaceae E Rubus vallis-cembrae Prosser & Király Prosser & Király (2019)
Crassulaceae A ×Sedeveria mauroi L.Gallo, Merli & Jankalski Gallo et al. (2020)
Caryophyllaceae Stellaria ruderalis M.Lepší, P.Lepší, Z.Kaplan & P.Koutecký Lepší et al. (2019)
Fabaceae E Vicia brulloi Sciandr., Giusso, Salmeri & Miniss. Sciandrello et al. (2019)
Violaceae E Viola cassinensis Strobl subsp. lucana Silletti, Perrino, Wagens. & Erben Perrino et al. (2018)
Ulmaceae Ulmus minor Mill. subsp. canescens Bartolucci & Galasso Bartolucci et al. (2019a)
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
51
Tab. 12 - Comparison 2018/2020 of native (native +
cryptogenic) taxa occurring in each of the 20 administrative
regions and increasing rate. / Confronto 2018/2020 dei
taxa nativi (nativi + criptogenici) presenti in ognuna delle
20 regioni amministrative e relativi tassi di incremento.
N + C
2018
N + C
2020
N + C 2020-2018
(increasing rate)
TOS 3,370 3,424 +54 (1.60%)
BAS 2,598 2,631 +33 (1.35%)
LAZ 3,003 3,038 +35 (1.16%)
SAR 2,305 2,327 +22 (0.95%)
MAR 2,497 2,520 +23 (0.92%)
CAM 2,813 2,835 +22 (0.78%)
CAL 2,768 2,786 +18 (0.65%)
EMR 2,798 2,815 +17 (0.61%)
MOL 2,301 2,314 +13 (0.56%)
LIG 3,002 3,018 +16 (0.53%)
ABR 3,190 3,206 +16 (0.50%)
PIE 3,463 3,479 +16 (0.46%)
LOM 3,272 3,286 +14 (0.43%)
FVG 2,975 2,987 +12 (0.40%)
VDA 2,289 2,298 +9 (0.39%)
VEN 3,169 3,181 +12 (0.38%)
UMB 2,364 2,372 +8 (0.34%)
TAA 3,116 3,119 +3 (0.10%)
PUG 2,552 2,554 +2 (0.08%)
SIC 2,763 2,764 +1 (0.04%)
ITA 8,195 8,237 +42 (0.51%)
Tab. 13 - Comparison 2018/2020 of alien (archaeophyte +
neophyte) taxa occurring in each of the 20 administrative
regions and increasing rate. / Confronto 2018/2020 dei
taxa alieni (archeote + neote) presenti in ognuna delle
20 regioni amministrative e relativi tassi di incremento.
ARC + NEO
[CAS, NAT, INV]
2018
ARC + NEO
[CAS, NAT, INV]
2020
ARC + NEO
2020-2018
(increasing rate)
CAL 267 342 +75 (28.09%)
FVG 436 508 +72 (16.51%)
TOS 580 644 +64 (11.03%)
VDA 149 163 +14 (9.39%)
SIC 437 473 +36 (8.24%)
BAS 220 237 +17 (7.73%)
MAR 356 381 +25 (7.02%)
PUG 361 384 +23 (6.37%)
ABR 350 369 +19 (5.43%)
LAZ 482 508 +26 (5.39%)
LIG 456 478 +22 (4.82%)
SAR 481 501 +20 (4.16%)
VEN 618 643 +25 (4.04%)
PIE 526 547 +21 (3.99%)
EMR 537 557 +20 (3.72%)
CAM 433 446 +13 (3.00%)
UMB 286 294 +8 (2.80%)
TAA 577 592 +15 (2.60%)
LOM 776 790 +14 (1.80%)
MOL 185 188 +3 (1.62%)
ITA 1,597 1,660 +63 (3.94%)
Less comforting is the increase of alien taxa by 63
(+3.94%), which documents a rapid and worrying increase
in allochthones, most signicant being the increase of 23
new naturalized and 6 invasive aliens. In some administra-
tive regions the increase is alarming (Tab. 13): +28.09% in
CAL, +16.51% in FVG, +11.03% in TOS. These values are
probably due to the intensication of exploration, however
these are substantial changes, which deserve great attention.
The taxa not conrmed for Italy have slightly decreased,
from 568 to 564. These taxa will be the object of a project
undertaken by the working group for Floristics, Systematics
and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, aimed at ve-
rifying their occurrence in Italy during the next few years.
Unfortunately, the number of taxa considered extinct has
slightly increased from 26 to 28, 13 of which are endemic to
Italy (Tab. 7). Three taxa were newly reported as extinct in
Italy [Carex pediformis C.A.Mey. subsp. pediformis; Crepis
mollis (Jacq.) Asch. subsp. mollis; Hieracium tolstoii Fen.
& Zahn, Fig. 1], while the taxonomic status of Puccinellia
gussonei Parl. (extinct in Bartolucci et al. 2018a), was re-
vised, being now considered as a synonym of P. festucifor-
mis (Host) Parl. subsp. lagascana M.A.Juliá & J.M.Monts.
(Bartolucci et al. 2020b; Abeli et al. 2021). The knowledge
that will be acquired in the coming years will be crucial to
better understand the conservation status of the Italian ora.
REFERENCES
Abeli T., Rocchetti G. A., Barina Z., Bazos I., Draper D.,
Grillas P., Iriondo J. M., Laguna E., Moreno-Saiz J.
C. & Bartolucci F., 2021 Seventeen “extinct” plant
species back to conservation attention in Europe. Na-
ture Plants, 7 (3): 282-286. <doi: 10.1038/s41477-021
-00878-1>
Bacchetta G., Brullo S., Feoli Chiapella L., Cusma Velari
T., Fenu G. & Giusso del Galdo G., 2020 – Taxonomic
remarks on Genista salzmannii group (Fabaceae) in
Sardinia and Corsica. Phytotaxa, 449 (1): 31-51. <doi:
10.11646/phytotaxa.449.1.4>
Bartolucci F., Peruzzi L., Galasso G., Albano A., Ales-
sandrini A., Ardenghi N. M. G., Astuti G., Bacchet-
ta G., Ballelli S., Ban E., Barberis G., Bernardo L.,
Bouvet D., Bovio M., Cecchi L., Di Pietro R., Domi-
na G., Fascetti S., Fenu G., Festi F., Foggi B., Gallo
L., Gottschlich G., Gubellini L., Iamonico D., Iberi-
te M., Jiménez-Mejías P., Lattanzi E., Marchetti D.,
Martinetto E., Masin R. R., Medagli P., Passalacqua
N. G., Peccenini S., Pennesi R., Pierini B., Poldi-
ni L., Prosser F., Raimondo F. M., Roma-Marzio F.,
Rosati L., Santangelo A., Scoppola A., Scortegagna
S., Selvaggi A., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Wa-
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
52
gensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Conti F., 2018a
An updated checklist of the vascular ora native
to Italy. Plant Biosystems, 152 (2): 179-303. <doi:
10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Ardenghi N. M. G., Ban E.,
Bernardo L., Bonari G., Buccomino G., Calvia G.,
Carruggio F., Cavallaro V., Chianese G., Conti F., Fa-
cioni L., Del Vico E., Di Gristina E., Falcinelli F., For-
te L., Gargano D., Mantino F., Martino M., Mei G.,
Mereu G., Olivieri N., Passalacqua N. G., Pazienza G.,
Peruzzi L., Roma-Marzio F., Scadi F., Scoppola A.,
Stinca A. & Nepi C., 2018b – Notulae to the Italian na-
tive vascular ora: 5. Italian Botanist, 5: 71-81. <doi:
10.3897/italianbotanist.5.25892>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Ardenghi N. M. G., Bacchetta
G., Bernardo L., Buccomino G., Buono S., Caldararo
F., Calvia G., Carruggio F., Cavagna A., D’Amico F.
S., Di Carlo F., Festi F., Forte L., Galasso G., Gargano
D., Gottschlich G., Lazzaro L., Magrini S., Maiorca
G., Medagli P., Mei G., Menini F., Mereu G., Mise-
rocchi D., Olivieri N., Passalacqua N. G., Pazienza G.,
Peruzzi L., Prosser F., Rempicci M., Roma-Marzio F.,
Ruggero A., Sani A., Saulle D., Steffanini C., Stinca
A., Terzi M., Tondi G., Trenchi M., Viciani D., Wa-
gensommer R. P. & Nepi C., 2018c – Notulae to the
Italian native vascular ora: 6. Italian Botanist, 6: 45-
64. <doi: 10.3897/italianbotanist.6.30575>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Alessandrini A., Angiolini C.,
Ardenghi N. M. G., Bacchetta G., Ban E., Bolpagni
R., Bonari G., Bräuchler C., Calvia G., Cancellie-
ri L., Cannucci S., Carruggio F., Conti F., Cavallaro
V., Fanfarillo E., Ferretti G., Festi F., Fiaschi T., Fog-
gi B., Forte L., Fröhner S. E., Galasso G., Gestri G.,
Gottschlich G., Labadessa R., Lastrucci L., Lazzaro
L., Mereu G., Morabito A., Mugnai M., Musarella C.
M., Orsenigo S., Pazienza G., Pennesi R., Peruzzi L.,
Pierini B., Podda L., Prosser F., Rossi G., Scoppola A.,
Spampinato G., Stinca A., Tomaselli V., Zangari G. &
Nepi C., 2019a – Notulae to the Italian native vascular
ora: 7. Italian Botanist, 7: 125-148. <doi: 10.3897/
italianbotanist.7.36148>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Ardenghi N. M. G., Bacaro G.,
Bacchetta G., Ballarin F., Ban E., Barberis G., Bec-
carisi L., Bernardo L., Bolpagni R., Bonari G., Bonini
I., Brullo S., Buono S., Buono V., Calbi M., Caldararo
F., Calvia G., Cancellieri L., Cannavò S., Dagnino D.,
Esposito A., Fascetti S., Filibeck G., Fiorini G., Forte
L., Galasso G., Gestri G., Gigante D., Gottschlich G.,
Gubellini L., Hofmann N., Lastrucci L., Lonati M.,
Lorenz R., Lunardi L., Magrini S., Mainetti A., Ma-
iorca G., Mereu G., Messa Ballarin R. T., Minuto L.,
Mossini S., Musarella C. M., Nimis P. L., Passalacqua
N. G., Peccenini S., Petriglia B., Podda L., Potenza G.,
Ravetto Enri S., Roma-Marzio F., Rosati L., Ruggero
A., Spampinato G., Stinca A., Tiburtini M., Tietto C.,
Tomaselli V., Turcato C., Viciani D., Wagensommer
R. P. & Nepi C., 2019b Notulae to the Italian nati-
ve vascular ora: 8. Italian Botanist, 8: 63-93. <doi:
10.3897/italianbotanist.8.48626>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Andreatta S., Angius R., Arden-
ghi N. M. G., Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Ban E., Bar-
beris D., Barberis G., Bernardo L., Bertolli A., Bonari
G., Bovio M., Briozzo I., Buccomino G., Calvia G.,
Chianese G., Cibei C., Conti F., Copez M., Crisanti A.,
Dagnino D., Di Filippo A., Esposito A., Fanni S., Fe-
sti F., Forte L., Galasso G., Gentili R., Gottschlich G.,
Lattanzi E., Liguori P., Locci M. C., Longo D., Lonati
M., Lucchese F., Marchetti D., Mariotti M. G., Menini
F., Minuto L., Orrù G., Pala M. L., Passalacqua N. G.,
Pellegrino M., Pennesi R., Peruzzi L., Pinzani L., Pi-
rastru G., Prosser F., Ravetto Enri S., Roma-Marzio F.,
Russo G., Scoppola A., Silletti G., Stinca A., Toffolo
C., Tomaselli V., Tondi G., Trenchi M., Turcato C. &
Nepi C., 2020a Notulae to the Italian native vascu-
lar ora: 9. Italian Botanist, 9: 71-86. <doi: 10.3897/
italianbotanist.9.53429>
Bartolucci F., Domina G., Bagella S., Barberis G., Brioz-
zo I., Calbi M., Caria M. C., Cavallaro V., Chianese
G., Cibei C., Conti F., Dagnino D., Esposito A., Galas-
so G., Giacanelli V., Forte L., Gottschlich G., Lattanzi
E., Longo D., Mei G., Merli M., Orsenigo S., Pau G.
B., Pazienza G., Peccenini S., Pisanu S., Rivieccio G.,
Roma-Marzio F., Scadi F., Selvi F., Stinca A., Turca-
to C. & Nepi C., 2020b – Notulae to the Italian native
vascular ora: 10. Italian Botanist, 10: 47-55. <doi:
10.3897/italianbotanist.10.60743>
Carnicero P., Schönswetter P., Garcia-Jacas N. & Gal-
bany-Casals M., 2019 Is there a need for accepting
paraphyletic taxa? A case study in the Sardinian en-
demic Cymbalaria muelleri (Plantaginaceae). Botani-
cal Journal of the Linnean Society, 191 (3): 325-338.
<doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boz052>
Conti F., Bracchetti L., Uzunov D. & Bartolucci F., 2019
A new subspecies of Corydalis densiora (Papave-
raceae) from the Apennines (Italy). Willdenowia, 49
(1): 53-64. <doi: 10.3372/wi.49.49107>
Conti F., Di Martino L. & Bartolucci F., 2020 – Poa ma-
gellensis (Poaceae), a new species from Central Apen-
nine (Italy). PhytoKeys, 144: 113-124. <doi: 10.3897/
phytokeys.144.49971>
Di Gristina E., Domina G., Gottschlich G., Maturo F. &
Scadi F., 2019 Hieracium racemosum subsp. lu-
canum (Asteraceae), a new hawkweed from southern
Italy. Phytotaxa, 425 (5): 297-300. <doi: 10.11646/
phytotaxa.425.5.5>
Doro D., 2020 – Anacamptis berica. A new tetraploid spe-
cies from the group of Anacamptis pyramidalis. Jour-
nal Europäischer Orchideen, 52 (2-4): 427-460.
Fröhner S. E. & Prosser F., 2019 Una nuova specie di
Alchemilla (Rosaceae) dall’Altopiano di Folgaria, La-
varone e Luserna (Trentino meridionale). Annali dei
Musei Civici-Rovereto. Sezione Archeologia, Storia,
Scienze Naturali, 34 (2018): 89-105.
Galasso G., Conti F., Peruzzi L., Ardenghi N. M. G., Ban-
E., Celesti-Grapow L., Albano A., Alessandrini A.,
Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Bandini Mazzanti M., Bar-
beris G., Bernardo L., Blasi C., Bouvet D., Bovio M.,
Cecchi L., Del Guacchio E., Domina G., Fascetti S.,
Gallo L., Gubellini L., Guiggi A., Iamonico D., Ibe-
rite M., Jiménez-Mejías P., Lattanzi E., Marchetti D.,
Martinetto E., Masin R. R., Medagli P., Passalacqua
N. G., Peccenini S., Pennesi R., Pierini B., Podda L.,
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
53
Poldini L., Prosser F., Raimondo F. M., Roma-Marzio
F., Rosati L., Santangelo A., Scoppola A., Scortegagna
S., Selvaggi A., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Wa-
gensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Bartolucci F., 2018a –
An updated checklist of the vascular ora alien to
Italy. Plant Biosystems, 152 (3): 556-592. <doi:
10.1080/11263504.2018.1441197>
Galasso G., Domina G., Adorni M., Ardenghi N. M. G.,
Bonari G., Buono S., Cancellieri L., Chianese G., Fer-
retti G., Fiaschi T., Forte L., Guarino R., Labadessa R.,
Lastrucci L., Lazzaro L., Magrini S., Minuto L., Mos-
sini S., Olivieri N., Scoppola A., Stinca A., Turcato C.
& Nepi C., 2018b – Notulae to the Italian alien vascu-
lar ora: 5. Italian Botanist, 5: 45-56. <doi: 10.3897/
italianbotanist.5.25910>
Galasso G., Domina G., Alessandrini A., Ardenghi N.
M. G., Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Bartolucci F., Brun-
du G., Buono S., Busnardo G., Calvia G., Capece P.,
D’Antraccoli M., Di Nuzzo L., Fanfarillo E., Fer-
retti G., Guarino R., Iamonico D., Iberite M., Latini
M., Lazzaro L., Lonati M., Lozano V., Magrini S.,
Mei G., Mereu G., Moro A., Mugnai M., Nicolel-
la G., Nimis P. L., Olivieri N., Pennesi R., Peruzzi
L., Podda L., Probo M., Prosser F., Ravetto Enri S.,
Roma-Marzio F., Ruggero A., Scadi F., Stinca A. &
Nepi C., 2018c Notulae to the Italian alien vascu-
lar ora: 6. Italian Botanist, 6: 65-90. <doi: 10.3897/
italianbotanist.6.30560>
Galasso G., Domina G., Ardenghi N. M. G., Aristarchi
C., Bacchetta G., Bartolucci F., Bonari G., Bouvet D.,
Brundu G., Buono S., Caldarella O., Calvia G., Cano-
Ortiz A., Corti E., D’Amico F. S., D’Antraccoli M., Di
Turi A., Dutto M., Fanfarillo E., Ferretti G., Fiaschi T.,
Ganz C., Guarino R., Iberite M., Laface V. L. A., La
Rosa A., Lastrucci L., Latini M., Lazzaro L., Lonati
M., Lozano V., Luchino F., Magrini S., Mainetti A.,
Manca M., Mugnai M., Musarella C. M., Nicolella G.,
Olivieri N., Orrù I., Pazienza G., Peruzzi L., Podda L.,
Prosser F., Ravetto Enri S., Restivo S., Roma-Marzio
F., Ruggero A., Scoppola A., Selvi F., Spampinato G.,
Stinca A., Terzi M., Tiburtini M., Tornatore E., Vetro-
mile R. & Nepi C., 2019a – Notulae to the Italian alien
vascular ora: 7. Italian Botanist, 7: 157-182. <doi:
10.3897/italianbotanist.7.36386>
Galasso G., Domina G., Andreatta S., Angiolini C., Ar-
denghi N. M. G., Aristarchi C., Arnoul M., Azzella
M. M., Bacchetta G., Bartolucci F., Bodino S., Bom-
martini G., Bonari G., Buono S., Buono V., Caldarella
O., Calvia G., Corti E., D’Antraccoli M., De Luca R.,
De Mattia F., Di Natale S., Di Turi A., Esposito A.,
Ferretti G., Fiaschi T., Fogu M. C., Forte L., Frigerio
J., Gubellini L., Guzzetti L., Hofmann N., Laface V.
L. A., Laghetti G., Lallai A., La Rosa A., Lazzaro L.,
Lodetti S., Lonati M., Luchino F., Magrini S., Mai-
netti A., Marignani M., Maruca G., Medagli P., Mei
G., Menini F., Mezzasalma V., Misuri A., Mossini S.,
Mugnai M., Musarella C. M., Nota G., Olivieri N., Pa-
dula A., Pascale M., Pasquini F., Peruzzi L., Picella
G., Pinzani L., Pirani S., Pittarello M., Podda L., Ra-
vetto Enri S., Rici C. D., Roma-Marzio F., Romano
R., Rosati L., Scadi F., Scarici E., Scarici M., Spam-
pinato G., Stinca A., Wagensommer R. P., Zanoni G.
& Nepi C., 2019b – Notulae to the Italian alien vascu-
lar ora: 8. Italian Botanist, 8: 63-93. <doi: 10.3897/
italianbotanist.8.48621>
Galasso G., Bartolucci F., Conti F., Martellos S., Moro A.,
Pennesi R., Peruzzi L., Pittao E. & Nimis P. L., 2020a –
L’inventario della ora spontanea italiana e il nuovo
Portale della Flora d’Italia. In: Al Museo per scoprire
il mondo. La ricerca scientica e le mostre tempora-
nee. Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano 2014-2019.
Alessandrello A. & Azuma M. (eds.). Natura, 110 (1):
47-56.
Galasso G., Domina G., Adorni M., Angiolini C., Apruz-
zese M., Ardenghi N. M. G., Assini S., Aversa M.,
Bacchetta G., Ban E., Barberis G., Bartolucci F., Ber-
nardo L., Bertolli A., Bonali F., Bonari G., Bonini I.,
Bracco F., Brundu G., Buccomino G., Buono S., Cal-
via G., Cambria S., Castagnini P., Ceschin S., Dagnino
D., Di Gristina E., Di Turi A., Fascetti S., Ferretti G.,
Fois M., Gentili R., Gheza G., Gubellini L., Hofmann
N., Iamonico D., Ilari A., Király A., Király G., Laface
V. L. A., Lallai A., Lazzaro L., Lonati M., Longo D.,
Lozano V., Lupoletti J., Magrini S., Mainetti A., Man-
ca M., Marchetti D., Mariani F., Mariotti M. G., Masin
R. R., Mei G., Menini F., Merli M., Milani A., Minuto
L., Mugnai M., Musarella C. M., Olivieri N., Onnis L.,
Passalacqua N. G., Peccenini S., Peruzzi L., Pica A.,
Pinzani L., Pittarello M., Podda L., Prosser F., Ravetto
Enri S., Roma-Marzio F., Rosati L., Sarigu M., Scadi
F., Sciandrello S., Selvaggi A., Spampinato G., Stin-
ca A., Tavilla G., Toffolo C., Tomasi G., Turcato C.,
Villano C. & Nepi C., 2020b Notulae to the Italian
alien vascular ora: 9. Italian Botanist, 9: 47-70. <doi:
10.3897/italianbotanist.9.53401>
Galasso G., Domina G., Azzaro D., Bagella S., Barone
G., Bartolucci F., Bianco M., Bolzani P., Bonari G.,
Boscutti F., Buono S., Cibei C., Conti F., Di Gristina
E., Fanfarillo E., Franzoni J., Giacanelli V., Gubellini
L., Hofmann N., Laface V. L. A., Latini M., Liccari F.,
Lonati M., Longo D., Lunesu L., Lupoletti J., Magri-
ni S., Mei G., Mereu G., Miconi F., Musarella C. M.,
Nicolella G., Olivieri N., Peruzzi L., Pica A., Pinzani
L., Pittarello M., Prosser F., Ranno V., Ravetto Enri
S., Rivieccio G., Roma-Marzio F., Scadi F., Spampi-
nato G., Stinca A., Tavilla G., Tiburtini M., Villa M.,
Wellstein C., Zerbe S. & Nepi C., 2020c – Notulae to
the Italian alien vascular ora: 10. Italian Botanist, 10:
57-71. <doi: 10.3897/italianbotanist.10.60736>
Gallo L., Merli M. & Jankalski S., 2020 ×Sedeveria
mauroi (Crassulaceae), a new alien species established
in NE Italy. Bradleya, 38: 187-194. <doi: 10.25223/
brad.n38.2020.a19>
Gennaio R. & Manni Q. G., 2020 – Centaurea akroterien-
sis (Asteraceae), a new species discovered in Salento
(Southern Apulia, Italy). Phytotaxa, 436 (3): 251-269.
<doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.436.3.4>
Gonnelli V., Gottschlich G. & Zoccola A., 2019 – Hiera-
cium racemosum subsp. amideii (Asteraceae), a new
hawkweed taxon from Montecristo island (Tuscan ar-
chipelago, Italy). Phytotaxa, 406 (5): 294-300. <doi:
10.11646/phytotaxa.406.5.5>
REPORT 2020 ON PLANT BIODIVERSITY IN ITALY: NATIVE AND ALIEN VASCULAR FLORA
54
Gottschlich G., 2019 – Taxonomische und nomenklato-
rische Änderungen in der Gattung Hieracium für die
Neuauage der Exkursionsora für Österreich und
die gesamten Ostalpen. Neilreichia, 10: 53-68. <doi:
10.5281/zenodo.2630525>
Hertel S. & Presser H., 2019 Weitere Erkenntnisse zur
Vielfalt der Epipactis-Arten im südlichen Italien.
Berichte aus den Arbeitskreisen Heimische Orchideen,
36 (1): 5-61.
Ilardi V., Troìa A. & Geraci A., 2020 – Brassica tardarae
(Brassicaceae), a new species from a noteworthy bi-
otope of South-western Sicily (Italy). Plants, 9 (8):
947. <doi: 10.3390/plants9080947>
Király G., Trávníček B. & Žíla V., 2019 – Taxonomic re-
vision of Rubus ser. Sylvatici in the Pannonian Basin
and adjacent regions. Preslia, 91 (3): 231-255. <doi:
10.23855/preslia.2019.231>
Lepší M., Lepší P., Koutecký P., Lučanová M., Kou-
tecká E. & Kaplan Z., 2019 Stellaria ruderalis, a
new species in the Stellaria media group from cen-
tral Europe. Preslia, 91 (4): 391-420. <doi: 10.23855/
preslia.2019.391>
López J. & Devesa J. A., 2019 Glyceria spicata sub-
sp. onubensis (Gramineae), nuevo taxón para la ora
ibérica. Acta Botanica Malacitana, 44: 99-101. <doi:
10.24310/abm.v44i0.6803>
Martellos S., Bartolucci F., Conti F., Galasso G., Moro A.,
Pennesi R., Peruzzi L., Pittao E. & Nimis P. L., 2020
FlorItaly - the portal to the Flora of Italy. PhytoKeys,
156: 55-71. <doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.156.54023>
Perrino E. V., Silletti G. N., Erben M. & Wagensommer
R. P., 2018 Viola cassinensis subsp. lucana (Viola-
ceae), a new subspecies from the Lucanian Apennine,
southern Italy. Phyton (Horn), 58 (2): 109-115. <doi:
10.12905/0380.phyton58(2)-2018-0109>
Peruzzi L., Conti F. & Bartolucci F. 2014 – An inventory
of vascular plants endemic to Italy. Phytotaxa, 168 (1):
1-75. <doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.168.1.1>
Prosser F. & Király G., 2019 Extending the range
of Rubus ser. Micantes (Rosaceae) southward: Ru-
bus vallis-cembrae, a unique new species from
Italy. Willdenowia, 49 (2): 167-175. <doi: 10.3372/
wi.49.49205>
Raimondo F. M., Spadaro V. & Di Gristina E., 2020 Cen-
taurea heywoodiana (Asteraceae), a new species from
the Nebrodi Mountains (NE-Sicily). Flora Mediterra-
nea, 30: 369-376. <doi: 10.7320/FlMedit30.369>
Ramírez E., Rufo L., Sánchez-Mata D. & de la Fuente V.,
2019 – Arthrocaulon meridionalis (Chenopodiaceae),
a new species of Mediterranean ora. Mediterranean
Botany, 40 (1): 33-41. <doi: 10.5209/MBOT.59820>
Rosati L., Coppi A., Farris F., Fascetti S., Becca G., Per-
egrym M., Tan K. & Selvi F., 2018 – The genus Gym-
nospermium (Berberidaceae) in Italy: identity and re-
lationships of the populations at the western limit of
the genus range. Plant Biosystems, 153 (6): 796-808.
<doi: 10.1080/11263504.2018.1549613>
Sciandrello S., Giusso del Galdo G., Salmeri C. & Mi-
nissale P., 2019 Vicia brulloi (Fabaceae), a new
species from Sicily. Phytotaxa, 418 (1): 57-78. <doi:
10.11646/phytotaxa.418.1.3>
Šrámková G., Kolář F., Záveská E., Lučanová M., Španiel
S., Kolník M. & Marhold K., 2019 – Phylogeography
and taxonomic reassessment of Arabidopsis halleria
montane species from Central Europe. Plant System-
atic and Evolution, 305 (10): 885-898. <doi: 10.1007/
s00606-019-01625-y>
Španiel S., Kaplan K., Bovio M., Mártonová L. & Cet-
lová V., 2018 – Alyssum rossetii (Brassicaceae), a new
species from the Aosta Valley in Italy based on mor-
phological and genome size data. Phytotaxa, 360 (3):
269-281. <doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.360.3.7>
FABRIZIO BARTOLUCCI, GABRIELE GALASSO, LORENZO PERUZZI, FABIO CONTI1
... Comparing the contributions of various Italian authors [159,27,160,161,57,43] over the past 15 years with the data provided by this study, there is a steady increase in allochthonous taxa (Table 3, Figure 1). Italian regions 2010 2018 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Trentino Alto Adige 264 549 564 588 935 961 962 Toscana 268 508 574 590 618 645 646 Umbria 202 265 271 284 311 324 327 Lazio 280 450 479 487 525 544 545 Molise 114 178 182 186 206 215 216 Campania 222 386 400 419 435 442 444 Puglia 165 337 362 368 387 404 407 Basilicata 160 208 224 235 243 253 261 Calabria 171 244 321 332 350 407 448 48 Italy" [43] and IPNI [153]; family and biological form according to Flora d'Italia [166] [also available at IPFI: Index Plantarum of Acta Plantarum [175]]; the range of origin according to POWO [60] and EPPO [176](2023), period of introduction in Italy (i.e., archaeophyte or neophyte) according to "Portal to the Flora of Italy" [43], the invasiveness status (according to [54]) and whether the species is reported for the first time at regional, Italian or European level or whether a change of status has occurred. ...
... In order to carry out a comparison across Italian regions, the percentage increase of alien taxa from 2010 to the present was evaluated, taking all Italian regions into consideration. To this end, the works carried out by several authors [159,27,160,161,57,43] were considered and compared with the new data presented in this study. In addition, two indices were calculated: the Degree of floristic pollution (%), expressing the percentage of alien taxa in the total flora of the area (native+alien taxa, excluding those reported by mistake, doubtful species, data deficient, historical records, and extinct) and the Density alien taxa, expressing the ratio of the natural logarithm of the number of alien taxa to the natural logarithm of the surface of the examined area (Ln N. alien taxa/Ln Km²). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
A single paragraph of about 200 words maximum. For research articles, abstracts should give a pertinent overview of the work. We strongly encourage authors to use the following style of structured abstracts, but without headings: (1) Background: Place the question addressed in a broad context and highlight the purpose of the study; (2) Methods: briefly describe the main methods or treatments applied; (3) Results: summarize the article’s main findings; (4) Conclusions: indicate the main conclusions or interpretations. The abstract should be an objective representation of the article and it must not contain results that are not presented and substantiated in the main text and should not exaggerate the main conclusions.
... Comparing the contributions of various Italian authors [27,43,58,[159][160][161] over the past 14 years with the data provided by this study, there is a steady increase in allochthonous taxa (Table 3, Figure 1). Table 3. Consistency of alien flora from 2010 to present for the 12 Italian regions surveyed with this study. ...
... In order to carry out a comparison across Italian regions, the percentage increase in alien taxa from 2010 to the present was evaluated, taking all Italian regions into consideration. To this end, the works carried out by several authors [27,43,58,[159][160][161] were considered and compared with the new data presented in this study. In addition, two indices were calculated: the Degree of floristic pollution (%), expressing the percentage of alien taxa in the total flora of the area (native + alien taxa, excluding those reported by mistake, doubtful species, data deficient, historical records, and extinct) and the Density alien taxa, expressing the ratio of the natural logarithm of the number of alien taxa to the natural logarithm of the surface of the examined area (Ln N. alien taxa/Ln km 2 ). ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite the wide amount of scientific contributions published on alien plant species, their diffusion dynamics, and their interactions with native taxa, it is increasingly difficult to slow down their spreading and their negative impact on habitats. Last recent years, in fact, a sharp rise in the number of new alien plant taxa introduced in Italy and Europe has been recorded. The aim of this work is to investigate most of the Italian territory in order to verify whether this alarming trend is still underway. Specimen collections and/or observations of alien plants have been performed in as many as 12 Italian regions. All the collected specimens are stored in public or private herbaria. Taxa have been identified according to the literature from the countries of origin of the investigated taxa, while the nomenclature followed the current international references. Updates on 106 taxa are reported. In particular, among 117 new records, 89 are first records, 27 are changes to status and there is 1 extinction. Seven new taxa for Italian alien flora are reported, two of which are new to Europe. The administrative regions with the highest number of records are Calabria (48), Sardegna (17) and Sicilia (15). Five of the surveyed taxa, for the first time, have been considered invasive aliens to Italian territory. The unfrequent amount of originalresults provided by this work, overthe simple importance of data itself, proves how floristic investigation, still today, represents one of the most effective tools in broadening the current knowledge about alien taxa and their dynamics.
... Following the iNaturalist categorization of WCA observations into alien and native species, we calculated the percentage of observations and the proportion of species classified as 'alien taxa' for all species, as well as separately for flora and fauna. The iNaturalist assignments were checked by consulting Galasso et al. [80] and Bartolucci et al. [81,82] for the flora and Loy et al. [83] and GBIF [84] for the fauna. The few casual records (in captivity or planted) were excluded from the analysis. ...
Article
Full-text available
Coastal areas are biodiversity hotspots, providing essential ecosystem services, yet they are among the most threatened systems, particularly by alien species invasion. The European regulation on invasive alien species (IAS) highlights early detection as a key prerequisite for effective containment or eradication strategies. Traditional monitoring methods are costly and time-consuming, and Citizen Science (CS) may be a promising alternative. We assessed the contribution of the generalist CS project “Wild Coast Adriatic” (WCA) developed on the iNaturalist platform to the detection of alien species (AS) along the Central Adriatic coast. Using WCA, we extracted alien occurrences and explored AS seasonal patterns, geographic origins, dangers (EU regulation), and distributions inside protected areas (Natura 2000 and LTER sites). Between 2020 and 2023, WCA gathered 2194 research-grade observations of 687 species, including 139 records of 50 AS, five of which are of European concern. Asteraceae and Fabaceae (plants) as well as insects and mollusks (fauna) were the most abundant aliens. The observations increased over time, with more records concentrated in autumn and summer. Most AS come from the Americas and occurred outside the protected areas. Our results underline the contribution of CS data for detecting AS in coastal ecosystems, offering a valid support for early warning, monitoring, and management strategies.
... Taxonomy and nomenclature followed (WFO 2023, Pignatti et al. 2017Bartolucci et al. 2018). Species were categorized as native (autochthonous species and species introduced before 1492, i.e., archaeophytes) and alien (species introduced after 1492, i.e., neophytes) Bartolucci et al. 2021Bartolucci et al. , 2022IPBES 2023). We recorded three categories of alien plant species (Pyšek et al. 2004), reported in Table 1. ...
Article
Full-text available
Invasive alien species represent a major threat to global biodiversity and the sustenance of ecosystems. Globally, mountain ecosystems have shown a degree of resistance to invasive species due to their distinctive ecological features. However, in recent times, the construction of linear infrastructure, such as roads, might weaken this resistance, especially in the Mediterranean basin region. Roads, by acting as efficient corridors, facilitate the dispersal of alien species along elevation gradients in mountains. Here, we investigated how the ecological features and road-associated disturbance in native plant communities affected both the occurrence and cover of alien plant species in Central Apennines (Italy). We implemented the MIREN road survey in three mountain transects conducting vegetation sampling in plots located both adjacent to and distant from the roads at intervals of ~ 100 m in elevation. We then used community-weighted means of Ecological Indicator Values for Europe together with Disturbance Indicator Values applied to plant species of native communities as predictors of alien species occurrence and cover in a machine-learning classification and regression framework. Our analyses showed that alien species’ occurrence was greater in proximity to the road where high soil disturbance occurred and in warm- and light-adapted native communities. On the other hand, alien species cover was more strongly related to moderate grazing pressure and the occurrence of nitrophilic plant communities. These findings provide a baseline for the current status of alien plant species in this Mediterranean mountain region, offering an ecological perspective to address the challenges associated with their management under global change.
... The Italian peninsula is considered an important hub of plant biodiversity, partly because of its geomorphologic diversity and its latitude extension. About 10,000 plant species have been recorded in Italy [1], presenting levels of species, habitat, and endemism in Europe [2,3]. The industrial revolution led to the emergence of specialized cropping systems, often based on the use of genetically uniform plants in monoculture systems to achieve high and consistent yields over time and to enable mechanization. ...
Article
Full-text available
In recent decades, the food production chain has undergone transformations that have profoundly affected the way food is supplied, causing changes in the quality of the final products. Moreover, biodiversity is seriously threatened worldwide, and the valorization of local germplasm is a priority goal for most sectorial policies in Europe and elsewhere. Southern Italy and the Mediterranean basin present a vast heritage of fruit tree cultivars that is gradually being lost. Through this work, we aim to valorize a well-adapted local pear cultivar named Petrucina from the Salento area (southeastern Italy, Apulia region), which has never been studied before in detail. With this aim, the nutritional and nutraceutical features of pear flesh were characterized and compared with a reference pear cultivar that is widespread and well-known in Europe (cv. ‘Conference’). Petrucina fruits have shown a peculiar aromatic compound profile, and a content of up to 398.3, 30.9, and 4.7 mg/100 g FW of malic acid, citric acid, and ascorbic acid, respectively, much higher than that of Conference fruits. Additionally, Petrucina flesh presents a more than triple total phenolic content and an antioxidant activity more than double that of Conference, making Petrucina a true functional food that deserves wide appreciation.
Chapter
An attempt is made to summarize decades of activities by many national and international actors and institutions that created ideal research conditions for the conservation of plant genetic resources of crops and their wild relatives (CWR). They are important for agriculture, food, and the environment, however being threatened by genetic erosion and/or by extinction. Information on ex situ and in situ conservation about cereals, vegetable crops, fruit trees, ornamental flowers, and medicinal aromatic and officinal plants along with their CWR is helpful to improve conservation strategies for sustainable use of plant diversity. In doing so, the work shows what has and what has not been done by reviewing the different forms of conservation, according to the needs of geneticists, botanists, breeders, other experts, and beneficiaries. Since Italy is part of Europe, issues were treated stressing the links of Italy to the rest of Europe. National organizations, like MiPAAF, CREA, CNR, Universities, Botanical Society, as well as national networks, like PlantA-Res and Italian seed bank network (RIBES), especially botanical gardens, besides international organizations, like FAO, Bioversity International, ECP/GR, and various international networks, like EURISCO, AEGIS, and others, have plaid and continue to play an important role in conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. The problematic of genetic modified organisms (GMOs) or more in general of the gene drive organisms (GDOs) was faced, since they do affect the conservation of biodiversity and, worst, do not solve the problem of world hunger. General critical points are presented and discussed. The most important amongst them is the lack of coordination.
Article
Critical species inventories provide primary biodiversity data crucial for biogeographical, ecological, and conservation studies. After six years, a second update to the inventory of the vascular flora native to Italy is presented. It provides details on the occurrence at regional level and, for the first time, floristic data for San Marino. The checklist includes 8,241 species and subspecies, distributed in 1,111 genera and 153 families; 23 taxa are lycophytes, 108 ferns and fern allies, 30 gymnosperms, and 8,080 angiosperms. The species/subspecies endemic to Italy are 1,702, grouped in 71 families and 312 genera. The taxa currently occurring in Italy are 7,591, while 545 taxa have not been confirmed in recent times, 94 are doubtfully occurring in the country, 11 are data deficient, and 236 are reported by mistake and to be excluded at national level. Out of the 545 not confirmed taxa, 28 are considered extinct or possibly extinct.
Article
Critical and updated alien species inventories are crucial to properly manage and contrast biological invasions. After six years, a second update to the inventory of the vascular flora alien to Italy is presented. It provides details on the occurrence at administrative regional level and, for the first time, floristic data for San Marino. The checklist includes 1,782 taxa (1,673 species, 28 subspecies, 69 hybrids, and 12 cultivar groups not attributable to a specific binomial), distributed in 786 genera and 159 families; 2 taxa are lycophytes, 13 ferns and fern allies, 37 gymnosperms, and 1,730 angiosperms. Among these, 154 taxa are archaeophytes and 1,628 neophytes. The alien taxa currently established in Italy are 899 (649 naturalized and 250 invasive), while 796 taxa are casual aliens, 1 are not assessed, 38 have not been confirmed in recent times, 4 are considered extinct or possibly extinct in the country, 40 are doubtfully occurring in Italy, 4 are of unknown regional distribution, and 110 are reported by mistake and to be excluded at national level. This checklist allows to establish an up-to-date number (10,023) of taxa currently constituting the whole (either native or alien) Italian flora.
Article
Full-text available
Conservation translocations are becoming common conservation practice, so there is an increasing need to understand the drivers of plant translocation performance through reviews of cases at global and regional levels. The establishment of the Italian Database of Plant Translocation (IDPlanT) provides the opportunity to review the techniques used in 186 plant translocation cases performed in the last 50 years in the heart of the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot. We described techniques and information available in IDPlanT and used these data to identify drivers of translocation outcomes. We tested the effect of 15 variables on survival of translocated propagules as of the last monitoring date with binomial logistic mixed‐effect models. Eleven variables significantly affected survival of transplants: life form, site protection, material source, number of source populations, propagation methods, propagule life stage, planting methods, habitat suitability assessment, site preparation, aftercare, and costs. The integration of vegetation studies in the selection of suitable planting sites significantly increased the success of translocation efforts. Although posttranslocation watering had a generally positive effect on translocation outcome, other aftercare techniques did not always increase transplant survival. Finally, we found that how funds were spent appeared to be more important than the actual amount spent. Plant translocations in Italy and in the Mediterranean area should account for the complexity of speciation, gene flow, and plant migrations that has led to local adaptations and has important implications for the choice and constitution of source material.
Article
Full-text available
In this contribution, new data concerning the distribution of vascular flora alien to Italy are presented. It includes new records, confirmations, exclusions, and status changes for Italy or for Italian administrative regions. Nomenclatural and distribution updates published elsewhere are provided as Suppl. material 1.
Article
Full-text available
The checklist of the Italian native and alien vascular flora, and a guide to Floritaly (Portal to the Flora of Italy). La checklist della flora vascolare autoctona e alloctona d'Italia e una guida a Floritaly (Portale della Flora d'Italia)
Article
Full-text available
A new species, Poa magellensissp. nov. , is described and illustrated based on collections from the Majella Mountains in Central Apennine, Italy. It is morphologically similar to P. ligulata Boiss., but can be distinguished by green leaves, the basal ones adaxially lightly scabrous or sparsely hairy, longer ligules particularly in the upper leaves, panicles denser with primary branches sub-erect to erect, glumes with broader scarious margin, more acute glumes and lemmas, lemmas and paleas longer, rachilla hairy, calluses usually with a crown of hairs or shortly webbed, caryopses longer. A distribution map of the species is also presented.
Article
Full-text available
A new allotetraploid species in the Stellaria media group, S. ruderalis M. Lepší, P. Lepší, Z. Kaplan & P. Koutecký, which is possibly of hybridogenous origin between S. pallida and S. neglecta, is distinguished and described based on a biosystematic revision of the S. media group. A suite of bio-systematic techniques, including molecular (internal transcribed spacer sequencing), karyological (chromosome counting, flow cytometry), multivariate morphometrics and phenological observations, was used to assess the variation in this species group and determine the taxonomic status of the species. All the methods employed produced similar results and supported the delimitation of four species within the Stellaria media group in central Europe: Stellaria ruderalis (2n = 4x = 44), S. pallida (2n = 2x = 22), S. neglecta (2n = 2x = 22) and S. media s. str. (2n = 4x = 40). Stellaria ruderalis is a winter annual growing mainly in disturbed ruderal open or semi-open communities. This species' broad ecological amplitude allows it to commonly co-occur with its three related species. It is probably a widespread species in southern and central Europe. It is currently spreading in the northern part of central Europe. Photographs of the type specimen and individuals of the new species in situ are presented. Scanning electron micrographs of seeds, microphotographs of seeds and mitotic chromosome spreads and a key for the identification of all four species are provided.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary histories of plants from the mid-elevation (montane) zone of European mountain ranges have only rarely been documented, standing in contrast to those of well-researched inhabitants of (sub-)alpine and foothill zones. To fill this gap, we have reconstructed the phylogeography of Arabidopsis halleri, a species preferring coniferous woodlands and corresponding secondary habitats in the montane zone of the Alps, Carpathians, Hercynian massif and Dinaric Alps. Based on range-wide sampling and finer-scale analyses of multiple multilocus DNA markers, we have addressed phylogeographic patterns among the Carpathian populations and inferred their relationships to A. halleri from neighbouring mountain ranges. We also present a taxonomic re-evaluation of the species in Europe, based on the revealed genetic structure complemented by morphological data. Besides two distinct Alpine groups, we identified a major phylogeographic split between the Western and South-Eastern Carpathians. Interestingly, Western and South-Eastern Carpathian populations were genetically closer to populations from neighbouring mountain ranges (the Hercynian massif and the Dinaric Alps for the Western and South-Eastern Carpathians, respectively) than they were to each other, likely reflecting long-term isolation in different parts of the Carpathians or different (re)colonization pathways during the Holocene. In spite of the considerable environmentally correlated variation, the five major European genetic groups exhibited distinctive morphological characters, and we therefore propose treating them as separate subspecies: A. halleri subsp. halleri (Western Europe, Hercynian massif), A. halleri subsp. tatrica (Western Carpathians), A. halleri subsp. ovirensis (Eastern Alps), A. halleri subsp. occidentalis (Western Alps) and A. halleri subsp. dacica (Eastern and Southern Carpathians and Dinaric Alps).
Article
Full-text available
Rubus ser. Micantes Sudre (Rosaceae) includes apomictic polyploid species of hybrid origin, which occur in north-western and central Europe, with rare outposts south-east of the Alps. The first regionally distributed representative of the series occurring in Italy, Rubus vallis-cembrae Prosser & Király, is described here as a morphologically unique, isolated tetraploid species. The new species is morphologically compared with related taxa of the series. Furthermore, comprehensive iconography and data on distribution and ecology are presented.
Article
Full-text available
A new species for Mediterranean flora (Arthrocaulon meridionale) from saline habitats of Sicily (Italy) is reported
Article
A new nothospecies belonging to the Crassulaceae was discovered by one of the authors (MM) near the Garda Lake (Trentino, Italy). Study of the plant in the field and in cultivation for some years has enabled us to ascertain that this plant belongs to the nothogenus ×Sedeveria. The nothospecies, not yet described, is the result of putative hybridization between Echeveria agavoides Lem. and Sedum cfr. pachyphyllum Rose, and the new name ×Sedeveria mauroi is now proposed. Like its parents, this hybrid is able to propagate itself easily, through new plantlets growing from leaves detached from the stem, while no seed production has been observed. ×Sedeveria mauroi is treated as naturalized.
Article
For the purpose of the present study we considered as Italian endemics those specific and subspecific taxa occurring in Italy that are not found elsewhere with the exception of Corsica (France) and Malta. This study presents an updated list of the endemic taxa in the Italian flora, including their geographical distribution at regional level. Italy is characterized by 1371 endemic species and subspecies (18.9% of the total vascular flora): three taxa belong to Lycopodiidae, one to Polypodiidae, two to Pinidae and 1365 to Magnoliidae (three paleoherbs, 221 monocots and 1144 eudicots). The endemic flora belongs to 29 orders, 67 families and 304 genera. Sicily, Sardinia, Calabria and Abruzzo are the four regions richest in endemics. About 58% of endemics are confined to a single administrative region. The most represented orders, families and genera are: Asterales, Caryophyllales and Asparagales, Asteraceae, Plumbaginaceae and Caryophyllaceae, Limonium, Centaurea and Hieracium, respectively. The phytogeographic isolation of Sardinia and Sicily and the separation of peninsular Italy from Northern Italy is confirmed. The relative isolation of Puglia with respect the remaining southern Italian pensinsular regions is also confirmed. Alpine region endemics (from northern Italy) are underrepresented.
2018a -An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy
  • R P Wilhalm
  • T Conti
gensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Conti F., 2018a -An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosystems, 152 (2): 179-303. <doi: 10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996>