A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-021-09550-z
ORIGINAL PAPER
Evolution Towards Fossoriality andMorphological Convergence
intheSkull ofSpalacidae andBathyergidae (Rodentia)
MorganeFournier1· LionelHautier2· HelderGomesRodrigues1
Accepted: 7 April 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Rodents show a wide range of anatomical, physiological, and behavioral adaptations to life underground. Cranial and
postcranial bone morphologies are deeply impacted by the modes of digging, which can involve either incisors or claws.
However, the morphological variation of these elements still needs to be accurately quantified to assess the degree of spe-
cializations of the fossorial rodent families in regards to their respective evolution. Here, we focus on the morpho-functional
characteristics of the masticatory apparatus in two families of subterranean rodents, the Spalacidae and Bathyergidae. We
quantify skull shape in five spalacid genera using geometric morphometric methods, as well as biomechanical estimates
for adductor muscles, which are compared with data previously published on bathyergids. We show that skull shape of
spalacids has a greater disparity and lower biomechanical estimates than bathyergids, in which the fossorial activity, notably
chisel-tooth digging, more significantly impacted the evolution of the skull. Among spalacids, Spalax shows the most extreme
specializations to life underground and displays the highest number of morphological convergences with chisel-tooth dig-
ging bathyergids, especially regarding its cranial shape and high biomechanical estimate for the temporalis muscle. Fewer
morphological convergences were observed between other spalacids and bathyergids. Different evolutionary histories can
potentially explain discrepancies observed between the two families, the first bathyergid morphological adaptations to fos-
sorial life being much older than those of spalacids.
Keywords Skull shape· Fossorial adaptations· Life underground· Rodents· Geometric morphometrics
Introduction
Fossorial habits are widespread among mammals, but it
is especially the case in rodents, which include ten fami-
lies displaying important specializations to fossorial life:
Aplodontidae, Sciuridae, Bathyergidae, Ctenomyidae,
Octodontidae, Echimyidae, Geomyidae, Spalacidae, Cri-
cetidae, and Muridae (Agrawal 1967; Nevo 1999; Lacey
etal. 2000; Begall etal. 2007). Some species, recognized
as subterranean, live underground to forage for food, repro-
duce, and disperse (Nevo 1979). These rodents show a spe-
cialized digging lifestyle, which is reflected by a number
of physiological (e.g., low basal metabolic rate) and ana-
tomical convergences (e.g., eyes and pinnae reduced, mas-
sive masticatory muscles; Morlok 1983; Stein 2000; Burda
2006). Subterranean species convergently evolved different
modes of digging, from “scratch digging” characterized
by alternate flexing and extension of forearms bearing
enlarged claws to “chisel-tooth digging” involving the use
of procumbent incisors to scrape the ground. Digging with
incisors is also suggested to be combined with shoveling
movements of the head in a few cases (Hildebrand 1985;
Laville etal. 1989; Stein 2000). These different modes of
digging are associated with important morphological vari-
ations of the body (e.g., head and limbs), which remain to
be accurately described, to better understand the different
adaptive events to burrowing life in rodents.
Two phylogenetically distant rodent families, the
Spalacidae and Bathyergidae, display some of the most
extreme specializations to fossorial life. Spalacids belong
to the superfamily Muroidea and comprise at least six
genera from Asia (bamboo rats: Cannomys and Rhizomys;
* Helder Gomes Rodrigues
helder.gomes-rodrigues@mnhn.fr
1 Centre de Recherche en Paléontologie - Paris (CR2P), UMR
CNRS 7207, CP38, Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle,
Sorbonne Université, 8 rue Buffon, 75005Paris, France
2 Institut Des Sciences de L’Evolution, cc64, Université de
Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, 34095Montpellier, France
/ Published online: 10 May 2021
Journal of Mammalian Evolution (2021) 28:979–993
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.