Content uploaded by Kelly Williams
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kelly Williams on May 09, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Williamsetal. BMC Res Notes (2021) 14:173
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05590-z
DATA NOTE
Using nextgeneration sequencing ofalpine
plants toimprove fecal metabarcoding diet
analysis forDall’s sheep
Kelly E. Williams1,4* , Damian M. Menning2, Eric J. Wald3, Sandra L. Talbot2, Kumi L. Rattenbury3 and
Laura R. Prugh1
Abstract
Objectives: Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) are important herbivores in the mountainous ecosystems of northwestern
North America, and recent declines in some populations have sparked concern. Our aim was to improve capabilities
for fecal metabarcoding diet analysis of Dall’s sheep and other herbivores by contributing new sequence data for
arctic and alpine plants. This expanded reference library will provide critical reference sequence data that will facilitate
metabarcoding diet analysis of Dall’s sheep and thus improve understanding of plant-animal interactions in a region
undergoing rapid climate change.
Data description: We provide sequences for the chloroplast rbcL gene of 16 arctic-alpine vascular plant species that
are known to comprise the diet of Dall’s sheep. These sequences contribute to a growing reference library that can be
used in diet studies of arctic herbivores.
Keywords: Alpine, Arctic, Boreal, Dall’s sheep, Diet, Fecal, Metabarcoding, Chloroplast, Plant
© The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material
in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material
is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco
mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ publi cdoma in/
zero/1. 0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Objective
Dall’s sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) are endemic to alpine eco-
systems of northwestern North America, and their pop-
ulations have been declining in recent decades [1–4].
Climate change may be altering alpine plant communi-
ties and contributing to these declines. Dall’s sheep have
a generalist plant diet; they were observed eating 110
different plant species in the Yukon Territory, Canada
through traditional observational methods [5]. However,
the diet of Dall’s sheep remains relatively poorly char-
acterized and represents a gap in understanding how
climate change is affecting plant-animal interactions in
alpine ecosystems.
e level of taxonomic resolution of items consumed
in a diet study greatly affects ecological analysis [6].
DNA based tools can infer diet composition with higher
resolution and reduces cost, time, and effort compared
to observational, morphological, and microhistological
methods [7, 8]. Specifically, DNA metabarcoding uses
universal primers for multispecies identification to mass-
amplify DNA barcodes using PCR that are then read
using next generation sequencing and assigned to the
appropriate taxon [9]. DNA barcoding includes a refer-
ence database of potential diet components, providing
the capability to identify diet items to a desirable taxo-
nomic resolution, ensuring that all components will be
detected and assigned [10]. Next generation sequencing
of DNA from fecal samples has been successfully used to
characterize diets of a variety of species, including ungu-
lates [11, 12]. However, metabarcoding has not yet been
used to assess the diet of Dall’s sheep. Lack of sequence
data for some arctic/alpine plants known to be grazed
Open Access
BMC Research Notes
*Correspondence: kel.elizabeth.williams@gmail.com
1 School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington,
Seattle, USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Page 2 of 4
Williamsetal. BMC Res Notes (2021) 14:173
upon by Dall’s sheep currently limits the development
and application of metabarcoding for alpine herbivore
diet studies.
To improve capabilities for diet analysis of Dall’s sheep
and other arctic herbivores, we used a python script [13]
to identify gaps in archived nucleotide sequence data for
species known to comprise the diet of Dall’s Sheep, then
obtained specimens of 16 species of arctic/alpine vascu-
lar plants for which sequence information was missing
or underrepresented in publicly archived databases. We
then sequenced the rbcL gene of the plant chloroplast
genome, which is one of the most commonly used bar-
coding regions for plants [9, 14].
Data description
Plant specimens were obtained from herbarium speci-
mens collected from the various arctic or alpine sites
across mainland Alaska (Additional file 1). Plant tissue
was extracted at the U. S. Geological Survey Alaska Sci-
ence Center, employing a CTAB-PVP protocol modified
from Stewart and Via [15] as reported by Muñiz-Sala-
zar et al. [16]. Extracts were quantified and shipped
to the School of Environmental and Forest Sciences
Genetics Lab at the University of Washington for PCR
amplification and NexteraXT library preparation for
sequencing. e rbcL gene region of each specimen was
amplified via a two-step PCR protocol [17] with a pri-
mary amplification with tailed primers (rbcLaf + adap-
tor, rbcLr506 + adaptor) followed by a second round of
amplification to anneal NexteraXT indices. Amplicons
were quantified using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (er-
moFisher) and diluted with dH2O to the recommended
starting concentration for library preparation, 0.2 ng/
μL (Illumina). Tagmentation, library amplification, and
clean-up steps were completed according to the Nexter-
aXT library preparation protocol (Illumina) with a vari-
ation of using New England Biolabs AMPure XP beads
for cleanup instead of Agentcourt AMPure beads. e
libraries were normalized and pooled prior to sequencing
on an Illumina Miseq platform. Samples were paired-end
sequenced in a 2 × 300bp format .
Illumina sequence reads were processed in Geneious
Prime 2020.2.4. Forward and reverse read files (fastq)
were paired upon import, then quality trimmed with
BBDuk trimmer (minimum quality 20, minimum over-
lap 20, minimum length 20). Sequences were normalized,
then aligned and assembled using the de novo assembly
tool (Geneious Prime). Assembled contigs were uploaded
and annotated using BankIt, then submitted to GenBank
[18] (Table1).
Limitations
e following are limitations for these data files:
1. We sequenced one DNA extraction from each plant
species.
2. e sequencing project was funded through a grant
to train new users on Illumina Nextera sequencing.
Abbreviations
rbcL: Large subunit of ribulose 1, 5 bisphosphate carboxylase/oxyge-
nase (RUBISCO or RuBPCase); CTAB-PVP: DNA extraction method using
Table 1 Overview of data files for arctic plant rbcL sequencing
Label Name of data le/data set File types Data repository and identier
Data file 1 Elymus borealis rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 513 [19]
Data file 2 Gentiana propinqua rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 515 [20]
Data file 3 Juncus mertensianus rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 523 [21]
Data file 4 Luzula arctica rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 524 [22]
Data file 5 Ranunculus kamchaticus rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 525 [23]
Data file 6 Oxytropsis scammaniana rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 526 [24]
Data file 7 Packera ogotorukensis rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 527 [25]
Data file 8 Penstemon gormanii rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 528 [26]
Data file 9 Saxifraga caespitosa rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 529 [27]
Data file 10 Silene tayloriae rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 530 [28]
Data file 11 Smelowskia integrifolia rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 531 [29]
Data file 12 Stellaria alaskana rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 532 [30]
Data file 13 Taraxacum lyratum rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 533 [31]
Data file 14 Anemone lithophilia rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW526 257 [32]
Data file 15 Carex pyrenaica rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 514 [33]
Data file 16 Elymus latiglumis rbcl contig *.gb https:// ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW537 582 [34]
Page 3 of 4
Williamsetal. BMC Res Notes (2021) 14:173
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide as a detergent-based extraction buffer
and polyvinylpyrrolidone, which is added to remove phenolic compounds
from plant DNA extracts [15, 16]; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction; NexteraXT:
NexteraXT DNA library preparation kit enables sequencing of small genomes,
PCR amplicons, and plasmids (Illumina); Miseq: Illumina Miseq Next Genera-
tion Sequencer is an integrated instrument that performs clonal amplification,
genomic DNA sequencing, and data analysis with base calling, alignment,
variant calling, and reporting in a single run (Illumina).
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1186/ s13104- 021- 05590-z.
Additional le1. Table of information about the plant specimens used
for rbcl sequencing.
Acknowledgements
The Illumina team at the University of Washington provided valuable training
on Illumina sequencing technology. Plant specimens were obtained from the
U.S. Geological Survey and the University of Alaska, Anchorage herbarium. Any
use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does
not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Authors’ contributions
EW, KR, DM, and ST identified need and with KW and LP contributed to study
design. ST obtained plant specimens and performed DNA extraction at the
U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, Alaska. DM scanned sequence
data archived in GenBank to identify data gaps for candidate plant species.
KR and DM chose the final list for analysis based on these data gaps, available
information on Dall’s sheep diets, and expected plants in habitat where
populations have declined (e.g., Brooks Range). KW performed laboratory
work for library preparation and sequencing and assembled sequences in
Geneious Prime. KW and LP wrote the manuscript, and DM, EW, and ST edited
the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Illumina and NASA’s Arctic and Boreal Vulnerability Experiment program (Grant
NNX15AU21A to LRP). The United States Geological Survey and National Park
Service provided funding in terms of salary and field and laboratory processes.
Availability of data and materials
Please see Table 1 and references [19–34] for details and links to the data.
Please see Additional file 1 for a table of information about the plant speci-
mens used for sequencing.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
There are no competing interests.
Author details
1 School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington,
Seattle, USA. 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage,
USA. 3 Arctic Network Inventory & Monitoring Division, National Park Service,
Fairbanks, USA. 4 Present Address: Department of Evolutionary Anthropology,
Duke University, Durham, USA.
Received: 11 February 2021 Accepted: 28 April 2021
References
1. Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG). Division of Wildlife Con-
servation, Wildlife Management Report (Juneau, AK: Alaska Department
of Fish and Game) Trends in Alaska sheep populations, hunting, and
harvests. 2014.
2. Koizumi CL, Carey J, Branigan M, Callaghan, K. Status of Dall’s’s sheep
(Ovis Dall’si Dall’si) in the Northern Richardson Mountains. Yukon Fish and
Wildlife Branch Report. 2011. TRC-11–01. Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada.
3. Rattenbury KL, Schmidt JH. Declining sheep populations in Alaska’s Arctic
Parks. Alaska Park Science 2017; 16: 67– 69. https:// www. nps. gov/ artic les/
aps- 16-1- 15. htm.
4. Rattenbury KL, Schmidt JH, Swanson DK, Borg BL, Mangipane BA, Sou-
sanes PJ. Delayed spring onset drives declines in abundance and recruit-
ment in a mountain ungulate. Ecosphere. 2018;9(11):e02513. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1002/ ecs2. 2513.
5. Hoefs M, Cowan I. Ecological investigation of a population of Dall’s sheep
(Ovis Dall’si Dall’si Nelson). Syesis. 1979;12:1–81.
6. Smith MA, Eveleigh ES, McCann KS, Merilo MT, McCarthy PC, Van Rooyen
KI. Barcoding a quanitified food web: crypsis, concepts, ecology and
hypotheses. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e14424.
7. Alberdi A, Aizpurua O, Bohmann K, Gopalakrishnan S, Lynggaard C,
Nielsen M, et al. Promises and pitfalls of using high-throughput sequenc-
ing for diet analysis. Mol Ecol Resour. 2019;19:327–48. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1111/ 1755- 0998. 12960.
8. Andriollo T, Gillet F, Michaux JR, Reudi M. The menu varies with metabar-
coding practices: a case study with bat Plecotus auritus 2019. PLoS ONE.
2019;14(7):e0219135.
9. Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WOC, Brown DS, Jarman SN. Who
is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol
Ecol. 2012;21:1931–50. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1365- 294X. 2011. 05403.x.
10. Nielsen JM, Clare EL, Hayden B, Brett MT, Kratina P. Diet tracing in ecology:
Method comparison and selection. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9:278–91.
11. Kartzinel TR, Chen PA, Coverdale TC, Erickson DL, Kress WJ, Kuzmina ML,
et al. DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by Afri-
can large herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:8019–24. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 15032 83112.
12. McShea WJ, Sukmasuang R, Erickson DL, Herrmann V, Ngoprasert D,
Bhumpakphan N, et al. Metabarcoding reveals diet diversity in an ungu-
late community in Thailand. Biotropica. 2019;51:923–37. https:// doi. org/
10. 1111/ btp. 12720.
13. Menning DM, Talbot S. Python scripts for bioinformatics, 2017. U.S. Geo-
logical Survey data release. 2018. https://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 5066/
F74F1 NZ4..
14. Hollingsworth ML, Clark AA, Forrest LL, Richardson J, Pennington RT,
Long DG, et al. Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven
candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of
land plants. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:439–57. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j.
1755- 0998. 2008. 02439.x.
15. Stewart CN, Via LE. A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful
for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques.
1993;14(5):748–50 (PMID: 8512694).
16. Muñiz-Salazar RM, Talbot SL, Sage GK, Ward DH, Cabello-Pasini A. Popula-
tion genetic structure of annual and perennial populations of Zostera
marina L. along the Pacific coast of Baja California and the Gulf of Califor-
nia. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:711–22.
17. de Vere N, Jones LE, Gilmore T, Moscrop J, Lowe A, Smith D, et al. Using
DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited
flower use despite high floral availability. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42838. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1038/ srep4 2838.
18. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell
J, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D36–42.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ nar/ gks11 95 (PMID: 23193287).
19. Williams K, et al. Elymus borealis rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers.
org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 513. 2021.
20. Williams K, et al. Gentiana propinqua rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 515. 2021.
21. Williams K, et al. Juncus mertensianus rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 523. 2021.
22. Williams K, et al. Luzula arctica rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers. org/
ncbi/ insdc: MW548 524. 2021.
Page 4 of 4
Williamsetal. BMC Res Notes (2021) 14:173
•
fast, convenient online submission
•
thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field
•
rapid publication on acceptance
•
support for research data, including large and complex data types
•
gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations
maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year
•
At BMC, research is always in progress.
Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions
Ready to submit your research
Ready to submit your research
? Choose BMC and benefit from:
? Choose BMC and benefit from:
23. Williams K, et al. Ranunculus kamchaticus rbcl partial GenBank https://
ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 525. 2021.
24. Williams K, et al. Oxytropsis scammaniana rbcl partial GenBank https://
ident ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 526. 2021.
25. Williams K, et al. Packera ogotorukensis rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 527. 2021.
26. Williams K, et al. Penstemon gormanii rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 528. 2021.
27. Williams K, et al. Saxifraga caespitosa rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 529. 2021.
28. Williams K, et al. Silene tayloriae rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers.
org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 530. 2021.
29. Williams K, et al. Smelowskia integrifolia rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 531. 2021.
30. Williams K, et al. Stellaria alaskana rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers.
org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 532. 2021.
31. Williams K, et al. Taraxacum lyratum rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW548 533 (2021).
32. Williams K, et al. Anemone lithophilia rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident
ifiers. org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW526 257. 2021.
33. Williams K, et al. Carex pyrenaica rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers.
org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW538 514. 2021.
34. Williams K, et al. Elymus latiglumis rbcl partial GenBank https:// ident ifiers.
org/ ncbi/ insdc: MW537 582. 2021.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub-
lished maps and institutional affiliations.