Content uploaded by Marcin Jaworski
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Marcin Jaworski on May 04, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Archaeological Science xxx (xxxx) xxx
Please cite this article as: Wojciech Ejsmond, Journal of Archaeological Science, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105371
0305-4403/© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
A pregnant ancient egyptian mummy from the 1st century BC
Wojciech Ejsmond
a
,
*
, Marzena O˙
zarek-Szilke
b
, Marcin Jaworski
c
,
1
, Stanisław Szilke
c
,
1
a
Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental Cultures, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Nowy ´
Swiat 72, pok. 327, Warsaw, Poland
b
Department of Archaeology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
c
Warsaw, Poland
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Egyptian mummy
Radiology
Physical anthropology
Egyptian religion
Archaeology of childhood
Non-invasive archaeology
Bioarchaeology
ABSTRACT
Radiological examination of an ancient mummy said to have been found in royal tombs in Thebes, Upper Egypt,
has proved it is the body of a pregnant woman. She came from the elite of Theban community and was carefully
mummied, wrapped in fabrics, and equipped with a rich set of amulets. Closer examination has revealed that
the woman died between 20 and 30 years of age together with the fetus in age between the 26th and 30th week
of the pregnancy. This nd is the only known case of an embalmed pregnant individual.
This mummy provides new possibilities for pregnancy studies in ancient times, which can be compared with
and related to current cases. Furthermore, this specimen sheds a light on an unresearched aspect of ancient
Egyptian burial customs and interpretations of pregnancy in the context of ancient Egyptian religion.
1. The main text
The development of research techniques of ancient mummies (see e.
g. Price et al., 2016) makes them a priceless sources that allow exami-
nation of well-preserved bodies from diverse perspectives and extracting
various information. A recent radiological research of ancient Egyptian
embalmed body preserved at the National Museum in Warsaw brought
to light substantial research material for various specialists and has a
potential to provide new data on a poorly known subject of pregnancy in
ancient times (see e.g. Cooper and Phelan 2017).
The collection of ancient Egyptian mummies preserved at the Na-
tional Museum in Warsaw has never been studied in detail before, with
the exception of some selected objects (see e.g. Urbanik et al., 2001).
The Warsaw Mummy Project was implemented in 2015 with the aim of
conducting a comprehensive analysis of all human and animal mummies
at the museum. One of the specimens has been completely reinterpreted
thanks to the current research and is the subject of this paper.
2. Provenance and history of the mummy
The mummy, its cofn, and cartonnage case (a decorated cover of the
mummy) (Figs. 1 and 2) are the property of the University of Warsaw,
deposited in the National Museum in Warsaw under the number
236805/3 since 1917/18. The object measures 162 x 42 ×28 cm. It was
acquired by Jan Wę˙
zyk–Rudzki (1792–1874) in Egypt and donated to
the University of Warsaw in December 1826 (Jaworski 2001: 49;
Doli´
nska 2003: 445). The ndspot of the mummy is uncertain as is the
itinerary of Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki’s travel. According to Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki’s letter
published in newspapers Monitor Warszawski [Warsaw’s Monitor] and
Gazeta Warszawska [Warsaw’s Newspaper] (14th and 16th of December
1826, respectively) the mummy came from the “royal tombs in Thebes”
(see also Doli´
nska 2003: 445–7), but according to Hipolit Skimbor-
owicz’s inventory of the Museum of Antiquities of the University of
Warsaw made c. 1869 (Jaworski 2001: 49 and 51) and Władysław
Noskowski’s obituary dedicated to Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki, the mummy came
from the Pyramid of Cheops in Giza (Noskowski 1874; Doli´
nska 2003:
446).
Skimbrowicz’s inventory was written many years after the mummy
was donated to the University (Jaworski 2001: 49) and there are some
errors in Noskowski’s obituary (Doli´
nska 2003: 446). Therefore,
Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki’s letter seem to be the most reliable rst-hand source.
However, in many cases antiquities were misleadingly ascribed to
famous places in order to increase their value (Doli´
nska 2003: 451), and
there are grounds to think that the mummy was not found in a royal
tomb (see below). Thus one cannot solely rely on Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki’s
statement.
The reading of the inscription on the cofn supports Wę˙
zyk-Rudzki’s
information published in the newspapers that the set came from Thebes
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: Wojtek.ejsmond@wp.pl (W. Ejsmond).
1
independent scholar.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Archaeological Science
journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105371
Received 28 December 2020; Received in revised form 1 March 2021; Accepted 8 March 2021
you can download whole article here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440321000418?via%3Dihub