A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Environment Development and Sustainability
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol:.(1234567890)
Environment, Development and Sustainability (2021) 23:18252–18277
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01437-6
1 3
Remote sensing‑based water quality index estimation
using data‑driven approaches: acase study oftheKali River
inUttar Pradesh, India
SaifSaid1 · ShadabAliKhan1
Received: 4 April 2020 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published online: 21 April 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021
Abstract
The present study evaluates the water quality status of 6-km-long Kali River stretch that
passes through the Aligarh district in Uttar Pradesh, India, by utilizing high-resolution IRS
P6 LISS IV imagery. Insitu river water samples collected at 40 random locations were ana-
lyzed for seven physicochemical and four heavy metal concentrations, and the water qual-
ity index (WQI) was computed for each sampling location. A set of 11 spectral reflectance
band combinations were formulated to identify the most significant band combination that
is related to the observed WQI at each sampling location. Three approaches, namely multi-
ple linear regression (MLR), backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and gene expression
programming (GEP), were employed to relate WQI as a function of most significant band
combination. Comparative assessment among the three utilized approaches was performed
via quantitative indicators such as R2, RMSE and MAE. Results revealed that WQI esti-
mates ranged between 203.7 and 262.33 and rated as “very poor” status. Results further
indicated that GEP performed better than BPNN and MLR approaches and predicted WQI
estimates with high R2 values (i.e., 0.94 for calibration and 0.91 for validation data), low
RMSE and MAE values (i.e., 2.49 and 2.16 for calibration and 4.45 and 3.53 for valida-
tion data). Moreover, both GEP and BPNN depicted superiority over MLR approach that
yielded WQI with R2 ~ 0.81 and 0.67 for calibration and validation data, respectively. WQI
maps generated from the three approaches corroborate the existing pollution levels along
the river stretch. In order to examine the significant differences among WQI estimates from
the three approaches, one-way ANOVA test was performed, and the results in terms of
F-statistic (F = 0.01) and p-value (p = 0.994 > 0.05) revealed WQI estimates as “not sig-
nificant,” reasoned to the small water sample size (i.e., N = 40). The study therefore recom-
mends GEP as more rational and a better alternative for precise water quality monitoring of
surface water bodies by producing simplified mathematical expressions.
Keywords Kali River· WQI· Spectral reflectance· MLR· ANN· GEP
* Saif Said
saif_said@rediffmail.com
Shadab Ali Khan
shadab7856gc@gmail.com
1 Civil Engineering Department, Aligarh Muslim University, (AMU), Aligarh, India
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.