ArticlePDF Available

Management of Cancer Patients During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, in a County in Romania

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has profoundly affected health systems by relocating resources, enforcing restrictive measures and burdening health care workers. The study aims to assess the changes in the treatment and the evolution of cancer patients in a county in Romania, with a population of over a half million inhabitants. Patients and method. Patients with breast, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer were studied over a two-year period: 14 months before the onset of the pandemic and 10 months after its beginning. The number of new cases of cancer, the number of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions, the number of surgeries and deaths from these four types of cancer were recorded. Results. During the pandemic, fewer chemotherapy sessions were administered for all cancers (p<0.0001). The number of radiotherapy sessions for breast (p<0.007) and colorectal cancer (p<0.002) increased by banning patients from going to university hospitals and decreased for lung cancer (p<0.03) which has symptoms similar to those of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions. Cancer patients had limited access to chemotherapy. Their diagnosis and treatment were included in the same category as non-life-threatening diseases. Testing, quarantine and travel limitation were not accompanied by additional safe medical services for the oncological patients. The death rate is inconclusive because the time since the onset of the pandemic is shorter than the natural evolution of the types of cancers studied.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Management of cancer patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, in a county in
Romania
Leşe Mihaela1, Micu-Chiş Raul2, Leşe Ioana3
1General surgery department, Baia Mare Emergency County Hospital, Romania
2General Surgery department, Cluj-Napoca Municipal Clinical Hospital, Romania
3Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern,
Switzerland
Abstract
Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has profoundly affected health systems by relocating
resources, enforcing restrictive measures and burdening health care workers. The study aims to
assess the changes in the treatment and the evolution of cancer patients in a county in Romania,
with a population of over a half million inhabitants. Patients and method. Patients with breast,
gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer were studied over a two-year period: 14 months before the
onset of the pandemic and 10 months after its beginning. The number of new cases of cancer, the
number of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions, the number of surgeries and deaths from
these four types of cancer were recorded. Results. During the pandemic, fewer chemotherapy
sessions were administered for all cancers (p <0.0001). The number of radiotherapy sessions for
breast (p <0.007) and colorectal cancer (p <0.002) increased by banning patients from going to
university hospitals and decreased for lung cancer (p <0.03) which has symptoms similar to
those of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions. Cancer patients had limited access to
chemotherapy. Their diagnosis and treatment were included in the same category as non-life-
threatening diseases. Testing, quarantine and travel limitation were not accompanied by
additional safe medical services for the oncological patients. The death rate is inconclusive
because the time since the onset of the pandemic is shorter than the natural evolution of the types
of cancers studied.
Keywords: cancer, pandemic, COVID-19, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, mortality,
discrimination.
Introduction.
The outbreak of the pandemic with Covid-19 caused a profound disruption in the
Romanian health system, one of the least performing in Europe, with a poor equilibrium,
affected by events to which the authorities, health professionals, the media and the population
have often reacted inappropriately: the crisis of the great burns from Colectiv (1), the fires in the
Giuleşti Maternity Hospital (2) or in the intensive care units (3).
The first case of Covid-19 infection was confirmed in Romania on February 26, 2020,
and in Maramureş County on February 28, 2020, county with a population of 519,386 inhabitants
on the 1st of July 2020. The first preventive measures were taken on January 22 and the state of
emergency and lockdown measures were imposed on March 16 of the same year.
2
An important category of patients affected by pandemic restrictions are cancer patients
who require chronic long-term treatment and have immunity affected by neoplasia and its
associated treatments, being among the most likely to contact a severe infection with the new
coronavirus (4). In Maramureş County, cancer patients have several treatment alternatives:
- Baia Mare County Emergency Hospital, tertiary hospital, with oncology, radiotherapy and
surgery departments, the main provider of health services for oncology patients in the county,
with 990 beds,
- a municipal hospital and a city hospital, with surgery wards and only the municipal hospital
with oncology department,
- two private medical centers with oncology departments,
- in Cluj County, the university hospitals in Cluj Napoca, at a distance of 150 km, with oncology,
radiotherapy and surgery services.
At the beginning of the pandemic, the authorities had contradictory reactions: The
National Health Insurance House has given the possibility to the attending physicians to decide
themselves whether to initiate, continue or stop the treatments for oncological patients, through
an issues statement on March 23rd, 2020, but the next day, on March 24th, the Order of the
Minister of the Interior suspended all hospitalizations and non-emergency operations for a period
of 14 days, although less than 800 cases were confirmed throughout the country. The media has
contributed to the chaos with alarming news and repeated images with a strong emotional impact
( e.g. ambulance carrying patients suspected of having coronavirus infection with a special
isolation unit like a shuttle ).
On the other hand, hospitalized cancer patients have an increased risk of developing
nosocomial infection with COVID-19 (5), but the ESMO's recommendation is to test cancer
patients and place them in facilities with 0 SARS-CoV-2 infection, so as not to interrupt
treatment, depending on the economic resources and the pressure of the pandemic for each
hospital (6).
Our study aims to compare the treatment of cancer patients before the pandemic, with
their management after its onset and the impact that the state of emergency and alert had on the
evolution of these patients in Maramureş County in Romania.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study on the population of Maramureş County, located in
northern Romania, which had on July 1st 2020 a number of 519,386 inhabitants. The study
included patients with 4 types of cancer: breast, gastric, colorectal and lung. For gastric cancer,
patients with eso-gastric junction cancer were also included in the study, colon and rectal cancers
were considered together, and lung cancers covered all cancers with this localization. The
following data were registered in the period 1.01.2019 - 31.12.2020:
- the number of new cases and deaths registered in the National Cancer Registry,
- the number of chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions, as well as the number of operations
performed for each type of cancer, from the databases of the hospitals that performed these
medical services: Baia Mare County Emergency Hospital, Sighetu Marmației Municipal
Hospital, Vişeu de Sus City Hospital and the two private medical centers. We did not consider
immunotherapy sessions.
3
Data analysis
The data recorded monthly from two periods were compared: 1.01.2019 - 28.02.2020 (14
months) - pre-pandemic period and 1.03.2020 - 31.12.2020 (10 months) - pandemic period with
COVID-19. Statistical analysis was performed with the following types of tests:
- Unpaired t-test, when the distribution and variation ( standard deviation ) were normal in the
two groups,
- Unpaired t-test with Welch`s correction, when the distribution was normal but not the variation,
- Mann-Withney test, when the distribution was not normal.
Statistical significance was considered for p <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using
Graph Pad Prism 9 (Graph Pad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
The most common cancers registered between 1.01.2019 and 31.12.2020 were colorectal
(361 patients), followed by lung (310 patients), breast (243 patients) and gastric (174 patients).
Comparing the two time periods (prepandemic and pandemic) we found that in the pandemic
months, there were fewer newly detected lung cancers (average 11.1 vs. 14.21), colorectal cancer
(average 14.8 vs. 15.21) and gastric (mean 6.2 vs. 7.92) and more breast cancers (mean 10.8 vs.
9.64) compared to the months before the pandemic (Table 1). None of these comparisons had
statistical significance, although the decrease in new cases of lung cancer approached this (p =
0.0521).
Table 1. New cases of cancer recorded over 24 months expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Type of
cancer
The months before the
pandemic ( n = 14 )
Months after the pandemic
began ( n = 10 )
p
Breast
9.64 ( ± 1.98)
10.8 ( ± 3.96 )
0.41
Gastric
7.92 ( ± 3.52 )
6.2 ( ± 2.57 )
0.2
Colorectal
15.21 ( ± 4.85 )
14.8 ( ± 4.1 )
0.82
Lung
14.21 ( ± 4.02 )
11.1 ( ± 3.07 )
0.05
During the pandemic, the number of chemotherapy sessions decreased statistically
significantly, with p <0.0001, in all four cancers studied (Table 2).
Table 2. Number of chemotherapy sessions recorded between 1.02.2019 - 31.12.2020, expressed
as mean ± standard deviation.
Type of
cancer
The months before the
pandemic ( n = 14 )
Months after the pandemic
began ( n = 10 )
p
Breast
147.9 ( ± 13.32 )
102.5 ( ± 17.28 )
Gastric
52.07 ( ± 6.08 )
30.9 ( ± 10.09 )
Colorectal
154.5 ( ± 22.02 )
108.2 ( ± 15.87 )
Lung
120.5 ( ± 8.48 )
92.8 ( ± 13.3 )
4
The number of surgeries increased for gastric (mean 1.6 vs. 1), colorectal (mean 11.9 vs.
9.64) and lung (mean 0.2 vs. 0.14) cancers, and those for breast cancer decreased ( 3.4 vs. 4.78)
in Maramureş County during the pandemic (Table 3), but without being statistically significant.
Table 3. Number of operations performed before and during the pandemic, expressed as mean ±
standard deviation.
Type of
cancer
The months before the
pandemic ( n = 14 )
Months after the pandemic
began ( n = 10 )
p
Breast
4.78 ( ± 2.54 )
3.4 ( ± 1.83 )
0.15
Gastric
1 ( ± 1.03 )
1.6 ( ± 1.57 )
0.38
Colorectal
9.64 ( ± 3.87 )
11.9 ( ± 3.92 )
0.13
Lung
0.14 ( ± 0.36 )
0.2 ( ± 0.42 )
>0.99
The only radiotherapy laboratory in Maramureş County, equipped with a linear
accelerator with 2 photon energies of 6, respectively 15 MV and a CT simulator for simulating
treatment plans, has been operating since May 2019. The number of radiotherapy sessions (Table
4) increased statistically significantly during the pandemic for breast (mean 147.2 vs. 69.07) and
colorectal (mean 73.8 vs. 32.93) cancers and decreased for gastric cancers (mean 7.9 vs. 9.64 )
and pulmonary cancers (mean 15 vs. 28.5). For the latter, the decrease was statistically
significant (p = 0.03).
Table 4. Number of radiotherapy sessions performed between 1.02.2019 - 31.12.2020, expressed
as mean ± standard deviation.
Type of
cancer
The months before the
pandemic ( n = 14 )
Months after the pandemic
began ( n = 10 )
p
Breast
69.07 ( ± 51,04 )
147.2 ( ± 57.84 )
0.007
Gastric
9.64 ( ± 13.07 )
7.9 ( ± 7.76 )
0.93
Colorectal
32.93 ( ± 32.93 )
73.8 ( ± 73.8 )
0.002
Lung
28.5 ( ± 19.77 )
15 ( ± 8.43 )
0.03
Deaths from breast, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancers are shown in Figure 1. None of the four
cancers changed statistically significantly after the onset of the pandemic.
5
After the onset of the pandemic, there were more deaths from breast, stomach, colon and rectal
cancer, but fewer from lung (Table 5), as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Breast, gastric, colorectal and lung cancer deaths before and during the pandemic,
expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Type of
cancer
The months before the
pandemic ( n = 14 )
Months after the pandemic
began ( n = 10 )
p
Breast
5.5 ( ± 2.68 )
6.3 ( ± 2.35 )
0.45
Gastric
5.42 ( ± 1.55 )
5.8 ( ± 2.09 )
0.62
Colorectal
9.85 ( ± 3.3 )
11.5 ( ± 3.59 )
0.25
Lung
13.71 ( ± 2.58 )
11.6 ( ± 2.83 )
0.21
Discussion
The COVID-19 pandemic has put pressure on all specialties that offer curative treatment
to cancer patients in order to reduce consultations, hospitalizations and treatments: surgeons,
oncologists and radiologists. The hospitals in Maramureş County are the lifeline for the patients
who were treated during the pandemic in the university clinics in Cluj-Napoca, who did not
receive them anymore for treatment. However, these specialties approached cancer patients
differently. Admissions to oncology wards were made only after testing, if patients were
negative, otherwise they had to wait 14 days for the quarantine to end in order to receive
treatment in a clean oncology ward without COVID- 19. On the other hand, compliance with the
spacing rules reduced the number of hospitalized patients by one third each month, in order to
reduce the risk of infection in immunocompromised cancer patients (7). The statistically
significant decrease in the number of chemotherapy sessions for breast, gastric, colon, rectal and
lung cancers (p <0.0001 in all cases) was also due to the deployment of specialists from these
departments to triage points and absences due to SARS- CoV-2 health workers` infections.
0
5
10
15
20
25
12345678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
NUMBER OF DEATHS
MONTHS
Graph 1. Deaths from cancer 1.01.2019 - 31.12.2020
Breast Gastric Colorectal Lung
6
The surgeons' strategy was different. With the support of the authorities, a general
surgery department was set up for the patients tested positive (8), and the rest of the surgery
departments in the county remained operating for asymptomatic patients, who were not tested,
but who underwent epidemiological triage. The number of breast cancer surgeries, which is
closely linked to neoadjuvant cancer treatment, has also decreased during the pandemic.
However, the number of operations for gastric, colorectal and lung cancer has increased, having
as main cause the reduction of the possibility of patients moving to university centers during the
pandemic. The decision to operate was an eclectic one, based on the decision of each surgeon,
which varied from the operation of cancers only with complications, to the operation of all
cancers, so as not to have a second pandemic of cancer deaths, due to delayed treatment (9 ). The
pandemic forced the deployment of surgery staff to cover the ward for positive patients and
affected staff who were quarantined for 14 days when they became infected, but without
hospitalizations and deaths. On the other hand, it was the decision of the patients to be
hospitalized and to be operated, many of them postponing the presentation to the surgeon due to
the fear of contamination in the hospital with coronavirus.
The radiotherapy department of the Baia Mare Emergency Hospital received all the
patients who needed this treatment, including those who could not go to university centers. The
number of breast (p <0.007) and colorectal (p <0.002) cancer patients who were irradiated
neoadjuvant or palliative during the pandemic increased statistically significantly. Palliative
radiotherapy for gastric cancers decreased statistically insignificantly (p = 0.93), as rapidly
evolving head and neck tumors, hemorrhagic or compressive tumors were prioritized for
radiotherapy (10). Patients with gastric cancer were irradiated only to alleviate local symptoms:
bleeding, pain, or obstruction (11). Lung tumors received less radiological treatment during the
pandemic months (p = 0.03) due to the particularities (12) of this group of patients:
- the worsening symptoms of lung cancer are similar to those of SARS-CoV-2 infection,
- the radiological images of the lungs of these patients with pneumonia due to radiotherapy,
chemotherapy or immunotherapy are similar to those suggestive of COVID-19 infection (13).
On the other hand, with respiratory symptoms, lung cancer patients avoided coming into contact
with the hospital during the pandemic months.
Diagnosis of cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic decreased the number of newly
registered cases due to restrictions imposed in family doctors' offices, outpatient clinics and
hospitals (14, 15). In our study, this decrease was recorded for gastric (p = 0.20), colorectal (p =
0.82) and lung (p = 0.052) cancers, but without reaching statistical significance, although it was
close to it in lung cancers, probably due to diagnostic difficulties in patients with respiratory
symptoms (12). However, the number of newly registered breast cancers increased, without
reaching statistical significance (p = 0.41), although in Romania there are no screening programs
for breast cancer. CT studies for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia incidentally found
macrocalcifications and tumor masses in the breasts (16), which therefore increased the number
of newly registered cases.
Although statistically insignificant, mortality increased in pandemic months for breast (p
= 0.45), gastric (p = 0.62) and colorectal (p = 0.25) cancers probably due to delayed diagnosis
and specific treatment, with the rules imposed by the pandemic (17, 18). It is likely that this
increase will reach statistical significance in the coming months, when the natural history of
7
these cancers will bring them to an end, and the delay in treatment will have the expected
negative effect.
The number of chemotherapy sessions was lower in the pandemic months mostly due to
the fact that only patients which tested negative or the ones that had negative tests after being
positive underwent treatment. The same restrictions could also be the reason why the number of
deaths increased for breast, gastric and colorectal cancers during the pandemic. However, the
authorities and hospitals in Maramureş County did not create oncology wards for COVID-19
positive patients, as they set up a surgery ward for them. Admission of patients tested positive in
the oncology department was prohibited to limit the nosocomial spread of the virus and
contamination of health workers (19, 20).
On the other hand, only the spread of the virus through saliva droplets has been
documented, its persistence in air being uncertain (21, 22). This means that the isolation of
asymptomatic positive COVID-19 patients in each hospital ward, in compliance with hygiene
measures (wearing masks, personal protective equipment - PPE, hand hygiene, etc.), would have
possibly been sufficient to prevent nosocomial infections and would have allowed the
administration of oncological treatments in a non-discriminatory manner.
Conclusion
The evolution of patients with breast, gastric, colorectal and lung cancer in Maramureş
County has been modified by the appearance of the pandemic and the imposition of related
safety measures, but the long-term results of the treatment of these patients will probably be in
the future even more affected than in the first 10 months of pandemic studied.
The pandemic affected both patients and staff. The oncologic patients were not only
discriminated, with priority being granted to SARS-Co-V-2-infected patients, but they also had
to suffer due to the lack of infrastructure necessary for the safe diagnosis and treatment of
cancer.
Testing, quarantine, and travel reduction have not been offset by the medical facilities to
support cancer patients, especially since cancer was considered one of the common diseases that
do not endanger patients' lives by delaying diagnosis or treatment.
Cancer patients in Maramureş County turned to the nearest specialized services available,
but they did not receive proper treatment due to the low addressability during the pandemic.
References
1. https://www.euronews.com/2020/10/30/colectiv-fire-romania-s-deadly-nightclub-blaze-
is-still-an-open-wound-five-years-on
2. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-10996632
3. https://emerging-europe.com/from-the-editor/romania-is-burning/
4. Yu J, Ouyang W, Chua MLK et al, SARS-CoV-2 transmission in patients with cancer at
a tertiary care hospital in Wuhan, China, JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6: 1108-1110
5. Elkrief A, Desilets A, Papneja N, Cvetkovic L, Groleau C, Lakehal YA, Shbat L, Richard
C, Malo J, Belkaid W, Cook E, Doucet S, Tran TH, Jao K, Daaboul N, Bhang E, Loree
JM, Miller WH Jr, Vinh DC, Bouganim N, Batist G, Letendre C, Routy B, High mortality
among hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection in patients with cancer: A multicentre
8
observational cohort study, Eur J Cancer. 2020 Nov;139:181-187. doi:
10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 3
6. Curigliano G, Banerjee S, Cervantes A, Garassino M, Garrido P, Girard N, Haanen J,
Jordan K, Lordick F, Machiels JP, Michielin O, Peters S, Tabernero J, Douillard JY,
Pentheroudakis G, Managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO
multidisciplinary expert consensus, Ann Oncol 2020 Oct;31(10):1320-1335. doi:
10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 31
7. Rolston KV. Infections in Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors: A Review. Infect Dis Ther.
2017;6:6983
8. Marano L, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Cancer care under the outbreak of COVID-19: A
perspective from Italian tertiary referral center for surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol.
2020;46:11841185
9. Pinheiro RN, Coimbra FJF, Costa-Jr WLD, Ribeiro HSC, Ribeiro R, Wainstein AJA,
Laporte GA, Coelho-Jr MJP, Fernandes PHS, Cordeiro EZ, Sarmento BJQ, Guimaraes-
Filho MAC, Anghinoni M, Baiocchi G, Oliveira AF, Surgical cancer care in the COVID-
19 era: front line views and consensus, Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202601. doi:
10.1590/0100-6991e-20202601. Epub 2020 Jul 3. PMID: 32638914
10. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng162
11. Tey J, Soon Y.Y, Koh W.Y, Leong C.N, Choo B.A, Ho F et al, Palliative radiotherapy
for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 25797-
25805https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15554
12. Calabrò L, Peters S, Soria JC, et al, Challenges in lung cancer therapy during the
COVID-19 pandemic, Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:542544. doi: 10.1016/S2213-
2600(20)30170-3
13. Catania C, Stati V, Spitaleri G, Interstitial pneumonitis in the COVID-19 era: a difficult
differential diagnosis in patients with lung cancer, Tumori. 2020 Aug
26:300891620951863. doi: 10.1177/0300891620951863. Online ahead of print,PMID:
32842909
14. Marques NP, Silveira DMM, Marques NCT, Martelli DRB, Oliveira EA, Martelli-Júnior
H, Cancer diagnosis in Brazil in the COVID-19 era, Semin Oncol. 2021 Jan 7:S0093-
7754(20)30123-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.12.002
15. Minucci A, Scambia G, De Bonis M, De Paolis E, Santonocito C, Fagotti A, Capoluongo
E, Concolino P, Urbani A, BRCA testing delay during the COVID-19 pandemic: How to
act?, Mol Biol Rep. 2021 Jan;48(1):983-987. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-06060-8
16. Al-katib Sayf, Gupta, G, Brudvik A, Ries S., Krauss J, Farah M, A practical guide to
managing CT findings in the breast, Clin Imaging. 2020 Apr;60(2):274-282. doi:
10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.009
17. Kuderer NM., Choueiri T.K., Shah D.P, Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with
cancer (CCC19): a cohort study, Lancet. 2020;395:19071918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-
6736(20)31187-9
18. Pinato DJ, Zambelli A, Aguilar-Company Clinical portrait of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic
in European cancer patients, Cancer Discov. 2020 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0773
9
19. Weinkove R, McQuilten ZK, Adler J, Agar MR, Blyth E, Cheng AC, Conyers R,
Haeusler GM, Hardie C, Jackson C, Lane SW, Middlemiss T, Mollee P, Mulligan SP,
Ritchie D, Ruka M, Solomon B, Szer J, Thursky KA, Wood EM, Worth LJ, Yong MK,
Slavin MA, Teh BW, Managing haematology and oncology patients during the COVID-
19 pandemic: interim consensus guidance, Med J Aust 2020 Jun;212(10):481-489. doi:
10.5694/mja2.50607
20. Wake RM, Morgan M, Choi J, Winn S, Reducing nosocomial transmission of COVID-
19: implementation of a COVID-19 triage system, Clin Med (Lond) 2020
Sep;20(5):e141-e145. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0411
21. Rosti ME, Olivieri S, Cavaiola M, Seminara A, Mazzino A, Fluid dynamics of COVID-
19 airborne infection suggests urgent data for a scientific design of social distancing, Sci
Rep. 2020 Dec 30;10(1):22426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80078-7
22. Leasa D, Cameron P, Honarmand K, Mele T, Bosma KJ; LHSC Ventilation Strategy for
COVID-19 Working Group, Knowledge translation tools to guide care of non-intubated
patients with acute respiratory illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Crit Care. 2021
Jan 8;25(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03415-2
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Providing optimal care to patients with acute respiratory illness while preventing hospital transmission of COVID-19 is of paramount importance during the pandemic; the challenge lies in achieving both goals simultaneously. Controversy exists regarding the role of early intubation versus use of non-invasive respiratory support measures to avoid intubation. This review summarizes available evidence and provides a clinical decision algorithm with risk mitigation techniques to guide clinicians in care of the hypoxemic, non-intubated, patient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although aerosolization of droplets may occur with aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMP), including high flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, the risk of using these AGMP is outweighed by the benefit in carefully selected patients, particularly if care is taken to mitigate risk of viral transmission. Non-invasive support measures should not be denied for conditions where previously proven effective and may be used even while there is suspicion of COVID-19 infection. Patients with de novo acute respiratory illness with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 may also benefit. These techniques may improve oxygenation sufficiently to allow some patients to avoid intubation; however, patients must be carefully monitored for signs of increased work of breathing. Patients showing signs of clinical deterioration or high work of breathing not alleviated by non-invasive support should proceed promptly to intubation and invasive lung protective ventilation strategy. With adherence to these principles, risk of viral spread can be minimized.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic is largely caused by airborne transmission, a phenomenon that rapidly gained the attention of the scientific community. Social distancing is of paramount importance to limit the spread of the disease, but to design social distancing rules on a scientific basis the process of dispersal of virus-containing respiratory droplets must be understood. Here, we demonstrate that available knowledge is largely inadequate to make predictions on the reach of infectious droplets emitted during a cough and on their infectious potential. We follow the position and evaporation of thousands of respiratory droplets by massive state-of-the-art numerical simulations of the airflow caused by a typical cough. We find that different initial distributions of droplet size taken from literature and different ambient relative humidity lead to opposite conclusions: (1) most versus none of the viral content settles in the first 1–2 m; (2) viruses are carried entirely on dry nuclei versus on liquid droplets; (3) small droplets travel less than 2.5m2.5m2.5\,{\mathrm{m}} versus more than 7.5m7.5m7.5\,{\mathrm{m}}. We point to two key issues that need to be addressed urgently in order to provide a scientific foundation to social distancing rules: (I1) a careful characterisation of the initial distribution of droplet sizes; (I2) the infectious potential of viruses carried on dry nuclei versus liquid droplets.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Studies suggest that patients with cancer are more likely to experience severe outcomes from COVID-19. Therefore, cancer centres have undertaken efforts to care for patients with cancer in COVID-free units. Nevertheless, the frequency and relevance of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 in patients with cancer remain unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence and impact of hospital-acquired COVID-19 in this population and identify predictive factors for COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer. Methods: Patients with cancer and a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were prospectively identified using provincial registries and hospital databases between March 3rd and May 23rd, 2020 in the provinces of Quebec and British Columbia in Canada. Patient's baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, cancer type and type of anticancer treatment were collected. The exposure of interest was incidence of hospital-acquired infection defined by diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 ≥ 5 days after hospital admission for COVID-unrelated cause. Co-primary outcomes were death or composite outcomes of severe illness from COVID-19 such as hospitalisation, supplemental oxygen, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission and/or mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 252 patients (N = 249 adult and N = 3 paediatric) with COVID-19 and cancer were identified, and the majority were residents of Quebec (N = 233). One hundred and six patients (42.1%) received active anticancer treatment in the last 3 months before COVID-19 diagnosis. During a median follow-up of 25 days, 33 (13.1%) required admission to the ICU, and 71 (28.2%) died. Forty-seven (19.1%) had a diagnosis of hospital-acquired COVID-19. Median overall survival was shorter in those with hospital-acquired infection than that in a contemporary community-acquired population (27 days versus unreached, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.4, p = 0.0006. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that hospital-acquired COVID-19, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status and advanced stage of cancer were independently associated with death. Interpretation: Our study demonstrates a high rate of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19, associated with increased mortality in both univariate and multivariate analysis in the cancer population, reinforcing the importance of treating patients with cancer in COVID-free units. We also validated that age and advanced cancer were negative predictive factors for COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer.
Article
Full-text available
Nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 puts patients with other medical problems at risk of severe illness and death. Of 662 inpatients with COVID-19 at an NHS Trust in South London, 45 (6.8%) were likely to have acquired COVID-19 in hospital. These patients had no evidence of respiratory or influenza-like illness on admission and developed symptoms, with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results, more than 7 days after admission (>14 days for 38 [5.7%] patients). Forty (88.9%) of these patients had shared a ward with a confirmed COVID-19 case prior to testing positive. Implementation of a triage system combining clinical assessment with rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing facilitated cohorting so that fewer susceptible patients were exposed to COVID-19 on shared wards. With hospital service resumption alongside the possibility of future waves of COVID-19 related admissions, strategies to prevent nosocomial transmission are essential. Point-of-care diagnostics can complement clinical assessment to rapidly identify patients with COVID-19 and reduce risk of transmission within hospitals.
Article
Full-text available
We established an international consortium to discuss clinical evidence and to provide expert advice on statements related to cancer management during COVID-19 pandemics. The steering committee prepared ten working packages addressing significant clinical questions from diagnosis to surgery. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology, statements have been discussed and voted upon. When consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements in order to develop consensual clinical guidance. The expert panel agreed on 28 statements that can be used to overcome many of the clinical and technical areas of uncertainty ranging from diagnosis to therapeutic planning.
Article
Full-text available
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly affected oncology practice across the globe. There is uncertainty as to the contribution of patients' demographics and oncologic features to severity and mortality from COVID-19 and little guidance as to the role of anticancer and anti–COVID-19 therapy in this population. In a multicenter study of 890 patients with cancer with confirmed COVID-19, we demonstrated a worsening gradient of mortality from breast cancer to hematologic malignancies and showed that male gender, older age, and number of comorbidities identify a subset of patients with significantly worse mortality rates from COVID-19. Provision of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy did not worsen mortality. Exposure to antimalarials was associated with improved mortality rates independent of baseline prognostic factors. This study highlights the clinical utility of demographic factors for individualized risk stratification of patients and supports further research into emerging anti–COVID-19 therapeutics in SARS-CoV-2–infected patients with cancer. Significance In this observational study of 890 patients with cancer diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, mortality was 33.6% and predicted by male gender, age ≥65, and comorbidity burden. Delivery of cancer therapy was not detrimental to severity or mortality from COVID-19. These patients should be the focus of shielding efforts during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426
Article
Recently, our lab, part of a referral center in Italy, reported its experience regarding the execution of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) testing during the first months of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which highlights a substantial reduction (about 60%) compared with the first 2 months of the current year. This evidence appeared to be a lockdown effect due to extraordinary restriction measures to slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the overall effects of the ongoing pandemic on gBRCA testing in our institution and to understand how COVID-19 has influenced testing after the complete lockdown (March 8–May 5, 2020). Additionally, we compared this year’s trend with trends of the last 3 years to better monitor gBRCA testing progress. This detailed analysis highlights two important findings: (1) gBRCA testing did not increase significantly after the lockdown period (May–October 2020) compared with the lockdown period (March–April 2020), emphasizing that even after the lockdown period testing remained low. (2) Comparing the total tests per year (January–October 2017, 2018, 2019, with 2020), the impact of COVID-19 on gBRCA testing is apparent, with similarities of trends registered in 2017. These evidences reveal a gBRCA testing delay for cancer patients and healthy patients at this moment, and the new era of gBRCA testing in the management of ovarian, breast, pancreas and prostate cancer patients has been seriously questioned due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As consequence, we underline that measures to guarantee oncogenetic testing (e.g., gBRCA testing) along with new diagnostic/clinic strategies are mandatory. For these reasons, several proposals are presented in this study. © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.
Article
In this coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) era, when pneumonitis occurs in patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a major challenge is to make a rapid and correct differential diagnosis among drug-induced pulmonary toxicity, tumour progression, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–induced pneumonitis. While waiting for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results, an accurate evaluation of the symptoms and serologic features can help us make a first diagnostic hypothesis and quickly start correct treatment. Physicians need a collaborative effort to develop and share a common database reporting clinical (anosmia, dysgeusia), serologic, and radiologic data in ICI-treated patients with lung cancer developing interstitial disease to create an evidence-based clinical diagnostic algorithm. This tool will continue to be helpful when we emerge from the pandemic crisis into a world in which COVID-19 may not have been eradicated to better select the target population requiring the most resource-consuming PCR tests.