ArticlePDF Available

Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of an Innovative Multifunctional Toilet

MDPI
Energies
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Innovative toilets can save resources, but have higher embodied impacts associated with materials and electronic components. This article presents an environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) of an innovative multifunctional toilet (WashOne) for two alternative configurations (with or without washlet), comparing its performance with those of conventional systems (toilet and bidet). Additionally, two scenario analyses were conducted: (i) user behavior (alternative washlet use patterns) and (ii) user location (Portugal, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Saudi Arabia). The results show that the WashOne with washlet has a better global environmental performance than the conventional system, even for low use. It also reveals that the use phase has the highest contribution to impacts due to electricity consumption. User location analysis further shows that Sweden has the lowest environmental impact, while Germany and the Netherlands have the highest potential for impact reduction when changing from a conventional system to the WashOne. Based on the overall results, some recommendations are provided to enhance the environmental performance of innovative toilet systems, namely the optimization of the washlet use patterns. This article highlights the importance of performing a LCA at an early stage of the development of innovative toilets by identifying the critical issues and hotspots to improve their design and performance.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Energies2021,14,2307.https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082307www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Article
EnvironmentalLifeCycleAssessmentofanInnovative
MultifunctionalToilet
CarlaRodrigues
1,
*,JoãoAlmeida
2,3
,MariaInêsSantos
2
,AndreiaCosta
4
,SandraAlém
5
,EmanuelRufo
5
,
AntónioTadeu
2,6
andFaustoFreire
1
1
ADAILAETA,DepartmentofMechanicalEngineering,FacultyofSciencesandTechnology,Universityof
Coimbra,RuaLuísReisSantos,PóloII,3030788Coimbra,Portugal;fausto.freire@dem.uc.pt
2
Itecons—InstituteforResearchandTechnologicalDevelopmentinConstruction,Energy,Environmentand
Sustainability,RuaPedroHispano,3030289Coimbra,Portugal;joao.almeida@itecons.uc.pt(J.A.);
mariaines.santos@itecons.uc.pt(M.I.S.);tadeu@dec.uc.pt(A.T.)
3
ChemistryCentre,DepartmentofChemistry,FacultyofSciencesandTechnology,UniversityofCoimbra,
RuaLarga,PóloI,3004535Coimbra,Portugal
4
OLI—SistemasSanitários,S.A.,TravessadoMilão,Esgueira3800314Aveiro,Portugal;
andreiac@oliworld.com
5
Sanindusa—IndústriadeSanitáriosS.A.,ZonaIndustrialAveiroSul,RuaAugustoMarquesBranco,84,
3810783Aveiro,Portugal;sandraalem@sanindusa.pt(S.A.);emanuelrufo@sanindusa.pt(E.R.)
6
ADAI,DepartmentofCivilEngineering,FacultyofSciencesandTechnology,UniversityofCoimbra,
RuaLuísReisSantos,PóloII,3030788Coimbra,Portugal
*Correspondence:carla.rodrigues@dem.uc.pt;Tel.:+351239790708
Abstract:Innovativetoiletscansaveresources,buthavehigherembodiedimpactsassociatedwith
materialsandelectroniccomponents.Thisarticlepresentsanenvironmentallifecycleassessment
(LCA)ofaninnovativemultifunctionaltoilet(WashOne)fortwoalternativeconfigurations(withor
withoutwashlet),comparingitsperformancewiththoseofconventionalsystems(toiletandbidet).
Additionally,twoscenarioanalyseswereconducted:(i)userbehavior(alternativewashletuse
patterns)and(ii)userlocation(Portugal,Germany,theNetherlands,SwedenandSaudiArabia).
TheresultsshowthattheWashOnewithwashlethasabetterglobalenvironmentalperformance
thantheconventionalsystem,evenforlowuse.Italsorevealsthattheusephasehasthehighest
contributiontoimpactsduetoelectricityconsumption.Userlocationanalysisfurthershowsthat
Swedenhasthelowestenvironmentalimpact,whileGermanyandtheNetherlandshavethehighest
potentialforimpactreductionwhenchangingfromaconventionalsystemtotheWashOne.Based
ontheoverallresults,somerecommendationsareprovidedtoenhancetheenvironmental
performanceofinnovativetoiletsystems,namelytheoptimizationofthewashletusepatterns.This
articlehighlightstheimportanceofperformingaLCAatanearlystageofthedevelopmentof
innovativetoiletsbyidentifyingthecriticalissuesandhotspotstoimprovetheirdesignand
performance.
Keywords:bidet;ecodesign;energysavings;lifecycleassessment;toilet;userbehavior;washlet;
watersavings
1.Introduction
Buildingsarerecognizedasoneofthehighestusersoffreshwater,consuming
enormousamountsofenergyandwaterresourcesand,ultimately,generatinghigh
environmentalimpacts.Thewatercycleofbuildingsrequiresagreatamountofenergy
duetorawwatertreatmentanddistribution,useinbuildings(domestichotwater),and
wastewatertreatment[1].Waterheatingrepresents13%ofenergyconsumptionin
residentialbuildings[2],withconventionaltoiletsystemshavingasignificantshare[3].
Citation:Rodrigues,C.;Almeida,J.;
Santos,M.I.;Costa,A.;Além,S.;Rufo,
E.;Tadeu,A.;Freire,F.Environmental
LifeCycleAssessmentofanInnovative
MultifunctionalToilet.
Energies2021,14,2307.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082307
AcademicEditor:IoanSarbu
Received:2March2021
Accepted:15April2021
Published:19April2021
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstays
neutralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsand
institutionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2021bytheauthors.
LicenseeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsand
conditionsoftheCreativeCommons
Attribution(CCBY)license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses
/by/4.0/).
Energies2021,14,23072of16
Innovativetoiletsystemscansavewaterandenergy,buthavehigherembodied
impactsassociatedwithmaterialsandelectroniccomponents.Environmentallifecycle
assessment(LCA)canbeappliedtoevaluateandcomparealternativetoiletsystems
(conventionalandinnovative),providingaholisticassessmentfromcradletograveand
avoidingburdenshifting.Inparticular,itisimportanttoanalyzetradeoffsbetween
increasedembodiedimpactsandoperationalsavingsofinnovativetoiletsystems.
Additionally,LCAperformedinearlydesignstagesofthedevelopmentofproductscan
supportdesigndecisionsbeforeinnovativeproducts’oremergingtechnologies’entryinto
themarket,revealingthebenefitsofconsideringenvironmentalperformanceasadesign
constraint[4,5].EmployingLCAsininnovativeproductsenablesimprovedproducteco
designthroughearlyhotspotdetectionallowingoptimizationofmaterialchoicesanduse
phaseefficiency.LCAshavebeenusedtoassesstheenvironmentalperformanceofseveral
innovativesystems/products,particularlyinthebuildingsector[6–9].
LCAmethodologyallowstheidentificationofhotspotsbyquantifyingthebenefits
ofaproductorsystemandimprovementopportunitiesfortheirenvironmental
performance.SomeLCAstudiesoftoiletsystemsavailableintheliteraturefocusedonthe
productionphaseofceramicsanitaryware(cradletosite)[10,11].ThereareseveralLCA
studiesfocusedonwastewatertreatment(WWT)forconventionaltoiletsandsource
separationsystems[12–15],whileothersexaminealternativewatersourcesfortheflush
system(rainwater,seawater,greywaterreuse)[16–23].Lametal.,2017assessedthe
energyefficiencyofnonpotablewatersystems(includingtoilets)fordomesticuse[24].
Gnoattoetal.,2019evaluatedthelifecycleimpactsofdifferentsolutionsfortoiletflush
systems,particularlycomparingsingleanddoubleflush[25].Theproductionphaseofa
toiletsystemisoftenneglectedinLCAstudiesoftoiletsystemsbecauseitscontribution
tothetotallifecycleimpactsisusuallylow(takingintoaccounttheextendedlifetimeof
thesesystems),butalsobecauseincomparativestudiesofalternativeWWTsystemsitis
usuallyassumedthatthetoiletisthesame,sotheimpactofthesanitarywareisthesame
inallscenarios.Regardingthe“washlet”system,therearenocomprehensiveLCAstudies
onthesetypesofsystems.
Severalgapswereidentifiedregardingtheenvironmentalassessmentofinnovative
toiletsthathaveneverbeenaddressedintheliterature.Firstly,therearenostudies
performingacradletogravelifecycleassessmentoftoilets,particularlytheinnovative
ones.Additionally,thereisaneedtoaddressthetradeoffsbetweenthepotentialenergy
efficiencyofinnovativetoiletsandtheincreaseintheenvironmentalimpactsdueto
energyconsumption,particularlyinthenewwashingfunctions,aswellastheuseof
criticalmaterialsinelectroniccomponents.Finally,thesetoiletshaveaworldwidemarket,
differentfromconventionalmodels,whichcanhighlyinfluencetheirenvironmental
performanceduetotransportationimpacts,aswellasaffectingthecountryspecific
electricitymixthatcanvarydependingonthefinaluserlocation.Tosumup,innovative
toiletshaveneverbeenstudiedinalifecycleperspectivetoassesstheirenvironmental
performanceandpotentialenergyefficiencybenefitsduetotheirmultifunctionality.
WashOneisaninnovativemultifunctionaltoiletthatincorporatesaselfcleaning
system(calledawashletsystem,toreplacetheconventionalbidet),andanintegrated
waterstorageandflushsystem[26].ArenderingoftheWashOnetoiletsystemis
presentedinFigure1.ThismultifunctionaltoiletisbeingdevelopedbyaPortuguese
consortiumcomprisingtwocompaniesfromthesanitarywareindustry(OLIand
Sanindusa),acompanyprovidingelectronicengineeringsolutions(Evoleo)andseveral
highereducationinstitutions(UniversityofAveiroandUniversityofCoimbra)and
appliedresearchinstitutions(Itecons,PortugueseAssociationforQualityinBuildings’
WaterInstallations‐ANQIP).
Energies2021,14,23073of16
Figure1.Renderingoftheinnovativemultifunctionaltoilet(WashOne).Source:Developedbya
subsetofauthors.
The“washlet”systemincorporatesconventionalbidetfeaturesintothetoilet,
respondingtoarecentmarkettrendforhighstandardsofcomfortandhygiene.Thewater
storageandflushsystemintegratedintothetoiletmeetsthecompactnessneedsrequired
bycurrentdesignsolutions(reducingthevolumeoccupied)andallowstheoptimization
oftheflushingsystemandconsequentlytheuseofwater.
Thegoalofthisarticleistopresentanenvironmentallifecycleassessmentofan
innovativemultifunctionaltoiletsystem(WashOne),fromcradletograve,considering
twoalternativeWashOneconfigurations(withorwithoutwashlet)comparedwith
equivalentconventionalsystems(toiletandbidet,orjusttoilet,respectively).
Additionally,twoscenarioanalyseswereconductedtoinvestigatetheperformanceofthe
innovativetoiletwithwashletwhenvariationsareintroducedintermsof:(i)user
behaviorand(ii)userlocation.
2.MaterialsandMethods
TheLCAmethodologyappliedtoassesstheenvironmentalperformanceofthetoilet
systemsfollowstheISO14040:2006andISO14044:2006standardstoguidethemethods,
modeldevelopmentandinventorycalculationsinthisresearch.LCAisdevelopedinfour
interrelatedphases:goalandscopedefinition;lifecycleinventory(LCI);lifecycleimpact
assessment(LCIA);andinterpretation.Section2.1presentsthegoalandscopedefinition,
includingthelifecyclemodel,andSection2.2presentsthelifecycleinventoryanalysis.
2.1.GoalandScopeDefinition
Acradletogravelifecycle(LC)modelwasdevelopedfortheWashOnetoilet.The
systemboundariesarepresentedinFigure2andencompassalllifecyclephasesincluding
wastewatertreatmentduringusephaseandtransportationbetweenandwithineach
phase.ThemainLCphasesofatoiletsystemare:(i)productionofthetoilet,auxiliary
systemsandsystem’sinfrastructure(piping,etc.);(ii)distributiontothefinaluser(in
Portugal,asreferencescenario);(iii)useinaresidentialbuilding;and(iv)endoflifeof
thecomponentsafter15yearsofservicelife(accordingtotheproducers).
Energies2021,14,23074of16
Figure2.Lifecyclemodel(“cradletograve”)ofWashOne.Source:Developedbyasubsetof
authors.
TheWashOnetoiletincorporatesmultiplefunctions,particularlythe“washlet”,a
selfcleaningsystem(toreplacetheconventionalbidet),andanintegratedwaterstorage
andflushsystem.Regardingthe“washlet”system,itaimstoreplacethebidetfunctions
withinthetoiletinordertoaddresshighcomfortandhygieneconditions.Itis
incorporatedinthelidandincludesthefollowingfunctions:lidlifterfunction,remote
control,WCseatwithseatheating,dryerarmwithdryernozzle,sprayarmwithspray
nozzleandladyshowernozzle,sprayshield,andodorremoval.
ThescopeofthestudyincludestwoWashOneconfigurations:WashOnewithand
withoutwashlet(WO1andWO2,respectively),bothofthemwithanintegratedwater
storageandflushsystem.TheWO1iscomparedwithaconventionaltoiletandbidet
(highend),whiletheWO2iscomparedonlywithjusttheconventionaltoilet,assuming
thatthereisnoadditionalcleaningsystemasabidet.Additionally,twoscenarioanalyses
wereconductedforWO1andtheconventionalsystem:(i)userbehaviorscenarioanalysis
and(ii)userlocationscenarioanalysis.Fortheuserbehavior,twoalternativewashlet
usagepatternswereassessed:onewherethewashletisusedinalltoiletvisits(W100);and
anotherwherethewashletisonlyusedinmajorvisits,i.e.,onevisitperdayperperson,
representing25%ofthedailyvisits(W25).Fortheuserlocationscenarios,fouralternative
locationswereassessed(Germany,theNetherlands,SwedenandSaudiArabia)and
comparedwithPortugal(referencescenario).Thefunctionalunitselectedistheuseofa
toiletsystem(conventionaltoiletandbidetorWashOne)bya4personfamily(twoadults
andtwochildren)livinginasinglefamilyhouseforoneyear(family×year)fortwotypes
ofuse:(a)withcleaningsystem(WO1)and(b)withoutcleaningsystem(WO2),assuming
aconventionaldailyusagepattern(definedinSection2.2.2).
2.2.LifeCycleInventoryAnalysis
TheLCinventorywasdevelopedusingprimarydatafromthecompaniesinvolved
inthedevelopmentoftheWashOnetoilet(materialcharacteristicsandquantitiesof
mechanical,plasticandelectroniccomponents),complementedwithsecondarydatafrom
theliteratureandtechnicalreports,aswellaslifecycledatabases(Ecoinvent)[27–30].The
energyandwaterusedatawereprovidedbythemanufacturerandcollectedbasedon
experimentaltests.Section2.2.1detailstheinventorydataforproductionanddistribution
Energies2021,14,23075of16
fromproductionsitetothebuildingsite(users’location).Section2.2.2presentsusephase
andendoflifeinventoryanalysis.
2.2.1.ProductionandDistribution
Theproductionphaseofthetoiletsystems(WashOneandconventional)includes
productionofcomponentsandfinalproductassemblage.TheWashOnesystemhasa
ceramicstructureinvitreouschina,flushmechanismsandtwoplasticstoragetanks
(severalmechanicalcomponents(motors,pumps,etc.),andelectronics.Thecorestructure
ismadeofceramic(vitreouschina)withaseatmadeofduroplast.Theconventionaltoilet
includesaceramicstructure,alsoinvitreouschina,aseat(madeofduroplast),aceramic
storagetankandaflushmechanism(madeofpolystyrene(PS)).Table1presentsthemain
inventorydataofmaterialsandcomponentsoftheWashOneandconventionaltoiletand
bidet.Thisdataisaggregatebymaterialorcomponent(whenthematerialscomposition
ofeachcomponentisnotavailable),inthiscaseproxydatawasused.Primarydata
(materialcharacteristicsandquantities)wereprovidedbythecompanies.Detailed
informationofeachcomponentwasnotpresentedduetoconfidentialityissues.
Secondarydataforcomponents,materials(thermoplasticpolymers)andplastic
transformationprocesses(injectionforacrylonitrilebutadienestyrene(ABS),and
polypropylene(PP),polycarbonate(PC)andduroplast,andthermoformingforPS)were
obtainedfromEcoinventv3.1database[27–30].Theproductionoftheceramicstructure
(vitreouschina)wasmodelledusingEcoinventv3.1database[27]andEnvironmental
ProductDeclaration(EPD)databases.TheplasticcomponentsoftheWashOneare
producedonsite,intheplantwherethefinalassemblingisperformed,locatedinAveiro,
Portugal.Theelectronicandmechanicalcomponentsandceramicstructureareproduced
offsitebyseveralsuppliers.Thisinnovativetoiletisstillcurrentlyinaprototypephase;
however,accordingtotheassemblageschemedevelopedbythecompanyforafuture
productionline,thecomponentswillbeassembledmainlymanually,sotheenergy
neededforthisprocesswillberesidual(~0.01kWhperfinalproduct)andcanbe
neglected.
Table1.BillofmaterialsofWashOne(WO1andWO2)andconventionalcounterparts(toiletand
bidet).Source:DevelopedbytheauthorsusingdatacollectedbytheauthorsaffiliatedwithOLI
andSanindusacompaniesandfromtheliterature.
Materials/ComponentsWO1WO2ToiletBidet
(kg)
AcrylonitrileButadieneStyrene(ABS)4.142.76‐ ‐
Aluminum0.050.00‐ ‐
Battery0.100.00‐ ‐
Cardboard8.508.5055
Ceramic(vitreouschina)17.017.050.427.6
Controlunit0.300.00‐ ‐
Copper0.040.00‐ ‐
Duroplast3.603.882‐
Fans0.070.05‐ ‐
Motors12V0.570.37‐ ‐
Polypropylene(PP)0.101.98‐ ‐
Polystyrene(PS)0.500.501‐
Polycarbonate(PC)0.010.01‐ ‐
Pumps40W3.003.42‐ ‐
Rubber0.060.06‐ ‐
Electronics(sensors)0.020.02‐ ‐
Steel0.910.66‐ ‐
Waterheater0.140.00‐ ‐
Totalweight41395833
TheWashOnetoiletsaredistributedbyroadusinglorriesand/orship(sea
containers)fromtheproductionsite(Aveiro,Portugal)tilltheenduserdestination(200
Energies2021,14,23076of16
km).Alternativeuserlocationshavebeenmodeledinascenarioanalysisforfivepotential
marketsidentifiedbythemanufacturerconsortium:inEurope(Portugal,Germany,the
NetherlandsandSweden);andintheMiddleEast(SaudiArabia,relevantconsumersof
advancedtechnologytoiletsystems).Foreachlocation,transportationdistances,
distributionmodesoftransportation,andcountryspecificelectricitymixesfortheuse
phasewereassessed.Transportationdistanceswerecalculatedbasedonthedistance
betweentheproductionsiteandapotentialfinaluserlocatedinthecapitalofeach
country.ForlocationsinEurope,themodeoftransportationwasa16tonlorry,but
distributionbyshipwasalsoconsideredforSwedenandtheNetherlandsduetoport
areas’proximity.FortheMiddleEast,distributionwasassumedtobebyboatandalorry
forinlanddistance.Transportbyplane,trainandshipweremodelledusingprocesses
fromtheEcoinventv.3.1database[31].Transportationdataforthealternativelocations
arepresentedinTable2.
Table2.Transportcharacterizationfordistribution,consideringalternativelocationscenariosfortheWashOnetoiletwith
washlet(WO1)andrespectiveconventionalsystem(toilet+bidet).Source:Developedbytheauthorsusingdatacollected
bytheauthorsaffiliatedwithOLIandSanindusacompaniesandfromtheliterature.
UserLocationModeofTransportationDistanceWO1
(41kg)
Conventional
ToiletandBidet
(91kg)
(km)(tkm1)
Portugal(PT)Lorry16ton—EURO5200818
Germany(DE)Lorry16ton—EURO52700111246
TheNetherlands(NL)Lorry16ton—EURO5210086191
Boat(+lorry16ton—EURO5)1800(+130)74(+5)164(+12)
Sweden(SE)Lorry16ton—EURO53500144319
Barco(+lorry16ton—EURO5)3500(+150)144(+6)319(+14)
MiddleEast
(SaudiArabia—SA)Boat(+lorry16ton—EURO5)10000(+230)410(+10)910(+21)
1Tonne×kilometer.
2.2.2.UsePhaseandEndofLife
TheWashOneandconventionalsystemsusephaseweremodeledforaconventional
usagepatterndefinedassumingadailyuseofa4personfamily,twoadultsandtwo
children(inequallynumberofbothgenders,necessarytocharacterizethetypeofvisits),
inasinglefamilyhouse.Detailedassumptionsfollowadailyuseoffivevisits,including
fourminor(urine)andonemajor(feces)foreachperson.Thewholefamilyusesonlyone
toilet.Thetoiletisused351daysperyear(assumingthat14daysarespentawayfrom
homeonvacation).BoththeWashOneandconventionaltoiletshaveadualflushsystem,
withfull(6L)andhalfflush(4.5L)formajorandminorvisits,respectively.The
consumptionoftoiletpaperiseightsheetsforminorvisitsand15sheetsformajorvisits.
Theuseofbidetintheconventionalsystemisonlyformajorvisits(onevisitperdayper
person).Dataregardingtimeofuse,waterconsumptionandenergyconsumptionwas
basedonexperimentaltestsaswellasdatafromtheliteratureandEPDdatabases
assumingastandardusepattern.Tables3and4presenttheWashOne’selectricityand
wateruseperfunctionandvisit(majorandminor).Thebidetsystem’scharacteristicsand
energyandwaterconsumptionaredescribedinTable5.
Energies2021,14,23077of16
Table3.WashOneelectricityuseperfunctionpervisit(majororminor).Source:Developedbytheauthorsusingdata
collectedbytheauthoraffiliatedwithOLIandfromtheliterature.
FunctionComponentsPower(W)TimeofUse(s)ConsumptionPerUse
(kWh)
AutomaticlidlifterMotor3636.0×105
SeatheatingElectricalresistance603005.0×103
WashletnozzlecleaningPump1241×105
User’scleaning
Pump12**
**
Motor284.4×106
Waterheater1444**
**
WashletnozzleoscillationMotor2603.3×105
DryingFan5304.2×105
Electricalresistance122301.02×103
OdorremovalFan53004.2×104
Fullflush(majorvisits)Pump10851.5×104
Halfflush(minorvisits)Pump1082.928.8×105
*Dependsonthetypeofvisit(seeTable4).
Table4.WashOnewaterandenergyuse(washletandtoilet)pertypeofvisit(majororminor).
Source:DevelopedbytheauthorsusingdatacollectedbytheauthoraffiliatedwithOLIandfrom
theliterature.
WashletandToiletUseParametersTypeofVisit
MajorMinor
Washlet(rearposition)(feminine/frontposition)
Waterusageduration1(s)4520
Waterflowrate(L/min)0.65
Usedwatervolume(L)0.490.22
Waterheaterefficiency10.95
WatertemperaturedifferenceΔT1(K)30(40–10°C)
Waterheatingenergy2(Wh) 18.068.03
Airdryerusageduration1(s)30
Airflowrate(L/s)3.33
Airheaterefficiency10.98
AirtemperaturedifferenceΔT1(K)30(45–15°C)
Airheatingenergy3(Wh)1.02
Totalenergyconsumption(Wh)19.089.05
Toilet
Flushwaterusage(L)6.0(fullflush)4.5(halfflush)4
Flushflowrate(L
/
s) 1.20
Flushduration(s)5.002.92
Pumpmotorpower(W)108.0
Energyconsumption(Wh)0.1500.088
1Estimatedrealisticassumption.2Pumpmotorandwaterheater.3Airblowermotorincluded.4
EuropeanNormEN14055.
Auserbehaviorscenarioanalysiswasperformedtoassessalternativewashletusage
patterns.Thewashletuseischaracterizedintermsofuseintensity(numberofusesper
day).FortheWO1(WashOnewithwashlet)configuration,thefollowingtwoscenarios
wereanalysed:W100—washletusedin100%oftoiletvisits;W25—washletusedonlyin
Energies2021,14,23078of16
majorvisits(25%ofdailyvisits).W25scenarioassumesthatinminorvisitsthefemale
userwillusetoiletpaper.WO2configurationconsiderstheuseoftoiletpaperinallvisits.
TheelectricitymixwasmodeledusingspecificliteraturedataforPortugalbasedon
[32,33].Fortheothercountries,specificcountrymixeswereusedbasedonliteraturefrom
theEcoinventv.3.1database[34,35].
Table5.Toiletandbidetenergyandwateruseinventory.Source:Developedbytheauthorsusing
datacollectedbytheauthoraffiliatedwithOLIandfromtheliterature.
BidetSystem’sInfrastructure
Waterheater’sefficiency0.8
Pipinglength1(m)8
Waterflow(L/min)6.4
Watertemperaturedifference2
T(K)30
Hotwaterquantity(L) 4
BidetUsePerVisit
Energyuse(kWh)0.2
Wateruse(L)8
ToiletWaterUsePerVisit
Flushwateruse(L)
Halfflush(minorvisits)4.5
Fullflush(majorvisits)6
1Fromtheheatingsourcetillthebidet.2Differencebetweenroomtemperatureandthewarm
temperaturedefined.
TheWashOneandconventionalsystemsusephasesweremodeledassuminga
conventionalWWTsystemwithoutthetertiarytreatment(notincludedinmostWWT
plants)andassumingacountryspecificenergymixdependingontheuser’slocation.For
thesecondarytreatment,ananaerobicprocess(sludgetreatmentwithoutoxygen)was
considered.Itwasassumedthatallthesanitaryresiduesfromthetoiletandbidet,
dependingonthesystem(urine,feces,toiletpaperandgreywater),areroutedfromthe
sewertoamunicipalWWTplantineachlocationassessed.Wastewatertreatmentswere
modelledusingtheEcoinventv.3.1database[36].
Fortheendoflifeofthecomponents,itwasconsideredthattheceramicmaterialis
disposedofinlandfillforinertmatter,steelcomponentsarerecycled,andtheelectronic
componentsareincineratedorrecycleddependingontheircomposition.Plasticmaterial
isrecycledorincinerated(withenergyrecovery)dependingonitsstructure.The
cardboardofthepackageisassumedtoberecycled.Theremainingmaterialsand
componentsareincinerated.WastetreatmentsweremodelledusingtheEcoinventv.3.1
database[29,36].
3.Results
3.1.ComparativeAssessmentandUserBehaviorAnalysis
EnvironmentalimpactswereassessedusingtwocomplimentaryLCIAmethods:
CED(CumulativeEnergyDemand)wasusedtocalculatethenonrenewableprimary
energy(NRPE),toaddressfossilenergyresourcedepletion;andtheCMLIAwasusedto
evaluatefivemidpointcategories:GlobalWarming(GW),followingIPCC2013foratime
horizonof100years,Acidification(A),Eutrophication(E),OzoneDepletion(OD)and
PhotochemicalOxidation(POC).Thesecategorieswereconsideredtobethemostrelevant
bytheEU[37,38],aswellasrecommendedbyseveralproductcategoryrules(PCR),
namelyPCRofsanitarywareandbuildingproducts[39,40].Figure3showstheresultsfor
thetwoWashOneconfigurations(WO1andWO2,withandwithoutwashlet,
respectively),includingthetwowashletusescenarios(W100andW25),comparedtothe
Energies2021,14,23079of16
conventionalsystems.Theconventionalsystem(toiletandbidet)presentshigherimpacts
thanWO1(inbothwashletusescenarios)forallimpactcategories.However,whenthe
WashOnedoesnotincludethewashletsystem(WO2),ithashighertotalLCimpacts(1–
8%)thantheconventionaltoiletinthreeoutofsiximpactcategories(acidification,
eutrophicationandphotochemicaloxidation).Whencomparingtheusescenarios,the
W100hashigherimpactsthanW25inallimpactcategoriesassessed.Theenvironmental
impactsareshowntobedrivenbytheusephase(71–95%oftotalLCimpactsforthe
WashOneand92–98%fortheconventionaltoilet)inalltoiletsystemoptionsforallimpact
categoriesassessed,followedbymaterialsproductionandcomponentsmanufacturing(5–
29%fortheWashOneand2–7%fortheconventionaltoilet).
Usephaseresults,presentedinFigure3b,showthatforWO1W100,thehigh
contributionoftheusephaseisduetoelectricityuseofthewashlet(climatechange,ozone
depletionandphotochemicaloxidation),wastewatertreatment(acidificationand
eutrophication)andflushwater(nonrenewableprimaryenergy).ForWO1–W25,the
processeswiththehighestimpactaretoiletpaper(climatechange,ozonedepletion,
photochemicaloxidationandnonrenewableprimaryenergy)andwastewatertreatment
(acidificationandeutrophication).Themaincontributortotheconventionalsystem(toilet
andbidet)usephaseimpactsaretheelectricityuseofthebidet(climatechange,ozone
depletionandphotochemicaloxidation),toiletpaper(acidificationandnonrenewable
primaryenergy),andwastewatertreatment(eutrophication).ForWO2andtoilet,theuse
oftoiletpaperhasthehighestcontributionforfiveoutofsixcategories,withtheexception
ofeutrophication,wherewastewatertreatmentprocessisthehighestcontributor.Energy
consumptioncontributesforabout30%ofthetotalLCimpactsofWashOneand30–65%
oftheconventionaltoiletinmostofthecategoriesassessed.Waterconsumption
contributesforabout15–30%oftotalLCimpactsofWashOneandabout10%ofthe
conventionaltoiletinfouroutofsixcategories.
Energies2021,14,230710of16
Figure3.LCIAresultsofthealternativetoiletsystems(WashOneandconventionaltoiletsystem)perfamily×year:(a)LC
impactsand(b)usephaseimpactsbreakdown.
Contributionanalysisoftheproductionphase(includingmaterialsproductionand
componentsmanufacturing)havehighlightedthekeydriversofenvironmentalimpacts
foralternativetoiletsystems.Figure4showsthatthekeycontributorsarethewashlet(26–
36%)followedbytheintegratedflushsystem(15–28%)fortheWO1.Themain
contributorstotheproductionphaseoftheconventionalsystemandWO2aretheceramic
structure(45–69%)andtheintegratedflushsystem(14–18%),makingupover60%ofthe
totalproductionimpacts.Regardingmaterialscontribution,plasticscontributeabout30–
45%totheproductionimpactsoftheWashOnesystem,whileelectroniccomponents
contributeabout30–65%infouroutofsixcategories(GW,NRPE,AandE).Plastics
contributeabout90%oftheendoflifeimpactsofmaterialsusedfortheproductionofthe
WashOne.Theseresultshighlightthatthereispotentialforimprovementinthe
productionoftheWashOnecomponents,particularlyplasticmadecomponents,for
instance,byincorporatingrecycledrawmaterialandreducingproductionlosses.
Energies2021,14,230711of16
Figure4.LCIAresultsfortheproductionphaseofthetoiletsystems(cradletogate)perfamily×year.
3.2.UserLocationScenarioAnalysis
Theuserlocationanalysiswasperformedforfivealternativelocations.Foreach
location,threeparameterswereassessed:thecountryspecificelectricitymixthat
influencestheenergyuseduringtheusephase;andthetransportationdistanceandmode
forthedistributionfromtheproductionsite(Portugal)toeachspecificlocation.Results
presentedinFigure5showthattheusephaseisthemaincontributortothetotalLC
impactsinalllocations,duetotheenergyuseineachcountry(andconsequentlythe
countryspecificelectricitymix).Swedenpresentsthehighestdistributionimpactsdueto
Energies2021,14,230712of16
thelargedistancestraveledbylorry(3500km),butstillwithverylittleinfluenceinthe
totalLCimpacts(lessthan5%).
Energies2021,14,230713of16
Figure5.UserlocationanalysisLCIAresults,consideringfivealternativelocations(Portugal(PT),Germany(DE),the
Netherlands(NL),Sweden(SE)andSaudiArabia(SA))andtwotransportationmodes(lorryandship).
WO1–W100andconventionaltoiletsystemshavethelowestenvironmentalimpacts
inSweden(SE)owingtothehighpercentageofrenewableenergy(morethan80%)inthe
Swedishelectricitymix,formostcategories(GW,NRPE,AandPOC).WO1W25hasthe
lowestimpactsinSaudiArabia(SA)formostcategories(NRPE,A,EandPOC).The
conventionaltoiletsystemhasveryhighimpactsinSAforallimpactcategoriesexcept
eutrophication,duetohighpercentageofoil(about60%)combinedwithnaturalgas
(about40%)usedfortheproductionofelectricity.GermanyandtheNetherlandshavethe
Globalwarming(GW)Nonrenewableprimaryenergy(NRPE)
Acidification(A)Eutrophication(E)
Ozonedepletion(OD)Photochemicaloxidation(POC)
Materialsproductionandcomponentsmanufacturing Distribution Use Endoflife
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+
Bidet
kgCO
2
eq
500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+Bidet
MJ
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+Bidet
kgSO
2
eq
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+Bidet
kgPO4‐‐‐ eq
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+Bidet
mgCFC11eq
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
PT
DE
NL‐lorry
NL‐ship
SE‐lorry
SE‐ship
SA
WO1‐W100 WO1‐W25 ConventionalToilet
+Bidet
gC
2
H
4
eq
Energies2021,14,230714of16
highestimpactreductionpotentialwhenchangingfromaconventionaltoilettoWashOne
(reductionof52–71%intotalLCimpacts).
4.ConclusionsandRecommendations
Anenvironmentallifecycleassessment(cradletograve)ofaninnovative
multifunctionaltoiletsystem(WashOne)wasperformed,consideringalternative
configurations(withorwithoutwashlet),comparedwithconventionalsystems.
Additionally,twoscenarioanalyseswereconductedtoinspecttheimpactofdifferentuser
behaviorsanduserlocationsontheenvironmentalperformanceofthesesystems.Forthe
userbehaviorscenarios,twoalternativewashletusagepatternswereassessed,onewhere
thewashletisusedinalltoiletvisits(W100)andanotherwherethewashletisonlyused
inmajorvisits(W25).Fortheuserlocationscenarios,fouralternativelocationswere
assessed(Germany,theNetherlands,Sweden,SaudiArabia)andcomparedwithPortugal
(referencescenario).
ItcanbeconcludedthattheWashOnesystemwithwashlet(WO1)hasabetter
environmentalperformancethantheconventionalsystem(toilet+bidet),whilewithout
washlet(WO2)presentssimilarperformancetotheconventionaltoilet.Theusephasehas
thehighestcontributiontothelifecycleimpactsinbothWashOneconfigurationsand
scenariosassessed.ThehighestcontributiontotheusephaseimpactsforWO1is
electricityuse(washletandintegratedflushsystem),whileforWO2itistoiletpaper.In
theconventionalsystem,electricityuseforthewaterheatersystemofthebidethasthe
highestcontributionfortheusephase.Itisworthnotingthatevenwhenthewashlet
systemhaslowuseintensity(W25),theWashOnesystemhasstillabetterperformance
thantheconventionalone.
UsephaseisthemaincontributortoLCimpactsinalllocations,duetotheenergy
useineachcountryand,consequently,thecountryspecificelectricitymix.Itisworth
notingthatthemarketwiththehighestpotentialfortheWashOnetobecompetitivein
termsofenvironmentalperformanceistheNorthofEurope,inthisstudyrepresentedby
Sweden,asitpresentedthelowestLCimpactsinmostcategories,independentofthe
modeoftransportationusedfordistribution.AlthoughSwedenpresentsthehighest
distributionimpactsduetothelargedistancestraveledbylorry(3500km),theyhavevery
littleinfluenceintheLCimpacts(lessthan5%).Additionally,Germanyandthe
Netherlandshavethehighestpotentialforimpactreductionwhenchangingfroma
conventionaltoilettoWashOne(reductionof52–71%LCimpacts).
Drawingontheresultsandonlimitationsofthisarticle,recommendationsto
enhancetheperformanceofinnovativetoiletsystemsareprovidedasfollows.Variability
anduncertaintyanalysisshouldbeincorporatedintheLCA,andtheusephase(highest
potentialforimprovement)shouldbecomprehensivelyassessed,astheresultswere
basedonastandardusepattern(fromexperimentaltestsatlabscale).Futureworkshould
alsoassessstrategiestoimproveenergyuseefficiencyandtominimizewateruseineach
visit(e.g.,incorporateaflowreducer,adjusthotwatertemperature).Toiletproduction
canalsobeimproved,inparticularplasticscomponents,byincorporatingrecycled
materialandreducingproductionlosses.Biobasedmaterialscanalsobeusedasan
alternativetofossilbasedpolymers.
ThisarticlehighlightstheimportanceofperformingLCAatanearlystageof
developmentofinnovativeproductsbyidentifyingthecriticalissuesandhotspots(the
maincontributorsforenvironmentalimpacts)toimprovetheirdesignandperformance.
Italsoshowsthesignificanceoftheusephaseintoiletsystems,givingdirectiontofurther
developmentsoftheWashOnesystem.Itisimportanttomentiontherelevanceof
addressingtheusephaseinPCRs(and,consequently,inEPDs)oftoiletsystems.
Energies2021,14,230715of16
AuthorContributions:A.C.providedthedataforthelifecyclemodelandinventory;S.A.and
E.R.providedthedataforthelifecyclemodelandinventory,aswellastherenderingpresentedin
Figure1;J.A.,M.I.S.andA.T.alsoprovideddata,contributedtothedataanalysisandreviewed
thepaper;C.R.andF.F.performedtheanalysis,interpretedtheresultsandwrotethepaper.All
authorshavereadandagreedtothepublishedversionofthemanuscript.
Funding:ThisresearchhasbeensupportedbyFEDER(EuropeanRegionalDevelopmentFund)
throughCompete2020(OperationalProgramCompetitivenessandInternationalization)underthe
WashOneprojectgrant(POCI010247FEDER017461).Thisworkhasalsobeensupportedby
FundaçãoparaaCiênciaeTecnologia—FCTthroughprojectsCENTRO010145FEDER030570
(SET‐LCA)andMERANET2/0017/2016(CTBBasics).
InstitutionalReviewBoardStatement:Notapplicable.
InformedConsentStatement:Notapplicable.
DataAvailabilityStatement:Thedatapresentedinthisstudyarepartlyavailableonrequestfrom
thecorrespondingauthor.Thedataarenotpubliclyavailableduetoprivacyissues.Detaileddata
regardingcomponentsandfunctionalitiesoftheinnovativetoiletisnotavailableduetopatent
confidentiallyissues.
Acknowledgments:TheauthorsarealsogratefultoallpartnersoftheWashOneprojectfortheir
contribution,andparticularlytoPedroMarquesforhisvaluablefeedbackinconductingthis
research.Theopenaccesspublicationcostswerealsocoveredbytheprojects.
ConflictsofInterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.
References
1. Mannan,M.;AlGhamdi,S.G.Environmentalimpactofwateruseinbuildings:Latestdevelopmentsfromalifecycle
assessmentperspective.J.Environ.Manag.2020,261,110198,doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110198.
2. EuropeanCommissionEnergyUseinBuildings.Availableonline:https://ec.europa.eu/energy/eubuildingsfactsheetstopics
tree/energyusebuildings_en(accessedon1February2021).
3. BIOIntelligenceService.WaterPerformanceofBuildings,FinalReportforEuropeanCommision;BIOIntelligenceService:Paris,
France,2012.
4. Weyand,S.;Wittich,C.;Schebek,L.Environmentalperformanceofemergingphotovoltaictechnologies:Assessmentofthe
statusquoandfutureprospectsbasedonametaanalysisoflifecycleassessmentstudies.Energies2019,12,4228,
doi:10.3390/en12224228.
5. Battisti,A.;Persiani,S.G.L.;Crespi,M.Reviewandmappingofparametersfortheearlystagedesignofadaptivebuilding
technologiesthroughlifecycleassessmenttools.Energies2019,12,1729,doi:10.3390/en12091729.
6. Gasia,J.;Fabiani,C.;Chàfer,M.;Pisello,A.L.;Manni,A.;Ascani,M.;Cabeza,L.F.Lifecycleassessmentandlifecyclecostingof
aninnovativecomponentforrefrigerationunits.J.Clean.Prod.2021,295,126442,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126442.
7. Cornaro,C.;Zanella,V.;Robazza,P.;Belloni,E.;Buratti,C.Aninnovativestrawbalewallpackageforsustainablebuildings:
Experimentalcharacterization,energyandenvironmentalperformanceassessment.EnergyBuild.2020,208,109636,
doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109636.
8. CasasLedón,Y.;DazaSalgado,K.;Cea,J.;ArteagaPérez,L.E.;Fuentealba,C.Lifecycleassessmentofinnovativeinsulation
panelsbasedoneucalyptusbarkfibers.J.Clean.Prod.2020,249,119356,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119356.
9. Göswein,V.;Rodrigues,C.;Silvestre,J.D.;Freire,F.;Habert,G.;König,J.Usinganticipatorylifecycleassessmenttoenable
futuresustainableconstruction.J.Ind.Ecol.2020,24,178–192,doi:10.1111/jiec.12916.
10. Lv,J.;Gu,F.;Zhang,W.;Guo,J.Lifecycleassessmentandlifecyclecostingofsanitarywaremanufacturing:Acasestudyin
China.J.Clean.Prod.2019,238,117938,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117938.
11. Silvestri,L.;Forcina,A.;Silvestri,C.;Ioppolo,G.Lifecycleassessmentofsanitarywareproduction:AcasestudyinItaly.J.Clean.
Prod.2020,251,119708,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119708.
12. Lam,L.;Kurisu,K.;Hanaki,K.Comparativeenvironmentalimpactsofsourceseparationsystemsfordomesticwastewater
managementinruralChina.J.Clean.Prod.2015,104,185–198,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.126.
13. Ishii,S.K.L.;Boyer,T.H.Lifecyclecomparisonofcentralizedwastewatertreatmentandurinesourceseparationwithstruvite
precipitation:Focusonurinenutrientmanagement.WaterRes.2015,79,88–103,doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.010.
14. Benetto,E.;Nguyen,D.;Lohmann,T.;Schmitt,B.;Schosseler,P.Lifecycleassessmentofecologicalsanitationsystemforsmall
scalewastewatertreatment.Sci.TotalEnviron.2009,407,1506–1516,doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.016.
15. Remy,C.;Ruhland,A.;Jekel,M.EcologicalAssessmentofAlternativeSanitationConceptswithLifeCycleAssessmentFinalReportfor
Subtask5oftheDemonstrationProject“SanitationConceptsforSeparateTreatmentofUrine,FaecesandGreywater”(SCST);Technische
UniversitätBerlin,Berlin,Germany,2006.
Energies2021,14,230716of16
16. Devkota,J.;Schlachter,H.;Anand,C.;Phillips,R.;Apul,D.DevelopmentandapplicationofEEAST:Alifecyclebasedmodel
foruseofharvestedrainwaterandcompostingtoiletsinbuildings.J.Environ.Manag.2013,130,397–404,
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.015.
17. Anand,C.;Apul,D.S.Economicandenvironmentalanalysisofstandard,highefficiency,rainwaterflushed,andcomposting
toilets.J.Environ.Manag.2011,92,419–428,doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.005.
18. Shi,Y.;Zhou,L.;Xu,Y.;Zhou,H.;Shi,L.Lifecyclecostandenvironmentalassessmentforresourceorientedtoiletsystems.J.
Clean.Prod.2018,196,1188–1197,doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129.
19. Liu,X.;Dai,J.;Ng,T.L.;Chen,G.Evaluationofpotentialenvironmentalbenefitsfromseawatertoiletflushing.WaterRes.2019,
162,505–515,doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.07.016.
20. IPCC.IPCC,2013:ClimateChange2013:ThePhysicalScienceBasis.ContributionofWorkingGroupItotheFifthAssessmentReportof
theIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange;CambridgeUniversityPress:Cambridge,UK;NewYork,NY,USA,2013.
21. Yoonus,H.;AlGhamdi,S.G.EnvironmentalperformanceofbuildingintegratedgreywaterreusesystemsbasedonLifeCycle
Assessment:Asystematicandbibliographicanalysis.Sci.TotalEnviron.2020,712,136535,doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136535.
22. Leong,J.Y.C.;Balan,P.;Chong,M.N.;Poh,P.E.Lifecycleassessmentandlifecyclecostanalysisofdecentralisedrainwater
harvesting,greywaterrecyclingandhybridrainwatergreywatersystems.J.Clean.Prod.2019,229,1211–1224,
doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.046.
23. Remy,C.;Jekel,M.Energyanalysisofconventionalandsourceseparationsystemsforurbanwastewatermanagementusing
LifeCycleAssessment.WaterSci.Technol.2012,65,22–29,doi:10.2166/wst.2011.766.
24. Lam,C.M.;Leng,L.;Chen,P.C.;Lee,P.H.;Hsu,S.C.Ecoefficiencyanalysisofnonpotablewatersystemsindomesticbuildings.
Appl.Energy2017,202,293–307,doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.095.
25. Gnoatto,E.L.;Kalbusch,A.;Henning,E.Evaluationoftheenvironmentalandeconomicimpactsonthelifecycleofdifferent
solutionsfortoiletflushsystems.Sustainability2019,11,4742,doi:10.3390/su11174742.
26. Cruz,P.;Costa,A.;Costa,V.;Pereira,M.;Rodrigues,L.;PimentelRodrigues,C.;Lopes,A.;Rodrigues,C.;Freire,F.;Almeida,
J.;etal.Innovativetoiletintegratingwaterstorageandflushingsystem,electronicbidetandurineseparation.(inPT:Sanita
inovadoraintegrandosistemasdearmazenamentoedescargadeágua,bidéeletrónicoeseparaçãodeurinas.).Indústriae
Ambient.2018,108,29–31.
27. Kellenberger,D.;Althaus,H.;Künniger,T.;Lehmann,M.;Jungbluth,N.LifeCycleInventoriesofBuildingProducts.Ecoinvent
Report;SwissCentreforLifeCycleInventories;Dübendorf,Switzerland;2007.
28. Hischier,R.LifeCycleInventoriesofPackagingandGraphicalPapers(PartI).EcoinventReportNo11;SwissCenterforLifeCycle
Inventories;Dübendorf,Switzerland,2007.
29. Hischier,R.LifeCycleInventoriesofPackagingandGraphicalPapers(PartII:Plastics).EcoinventReportNo11;SwissCenterforLife
CycleInventories;Dübendorf,Switzerland,2007.
30. Hischier,R.;Classen,M.;Lehmann,M.;Scharnhorst,W.EcoinventReportNo18:LifeCycleInventoriesofElectricandElectronic
Equipment:Production,UseandDisposal(PartI);SwissCenterforLifeCycleInventories;Dübendorf,Switzerland,2007.
31. Spielmann,M.;Bauer,C.;Dones,R.;Tuchschmin,M.LifeCycleInventoriesofTransportServices.EcoinventRep.No14,v2.0;2007.
32. Garcia,R.;Marques,P.;Freire,F.LifecycleassessmentofelectricityinPortugal.Appl.Energy2014,134,563–572,
doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.067.
33. Kabayo,J.;Marques,P.;Garcia,R.;Freire,F.Lifecyclesustainabilityassessmentofkeyelectricitygenerationsystemsin
Portugal.Energy2019,176,131–142,doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.166.
34. Dones,R.;Bauer,C.;Bolliger,R.;Burger,B.;Heck,T.;Röder,A.;Institut,P.S.;Emmenegger,M.F.;Frischknecht,R.;Jungbluth,
N.;etal.LifeCycleInventoriesofEnergySystems:ResultsforCurrentSystemsinSwitzerlandandOtherUCTECountries.Ecoinvent
Rep.No5;SwissCentreforLifeCycleInventories;Dübendorf,Switzerland,2007.
35. Ruiz,M.Documentationofchangesimplementedinecoinvent.EcoinventReport.SwissCentreforLifeCycleInventories;
Dübendorf,Switzerland;2013.
36. Doka,G.LifeCycleInventoriesofWasteTreatmentServices.EcoinventRep.No.13;SwissCentreforLifeCycleInventories;
Dübendorf,Switzerland,2003;p.111.
37. JRCIES.ILCDHandbook.InternationalReferenceLifeCycleDataSystem.GeneralGuideforLifeCycleAssessment;JointResearch
Center;Ispra,Italy,2010.
38. Fazio,S.;Biganzioli,F.;DeLaurentiis,V.;Zampori,L.;Sala,S.;Diaconu,E.SupportingInformationtotheCharacterisationFactors
ofRecommendedEFLifeCycleImpactAssessmentMethods,Version2,fromILCDtoEF3.0,EUR29600EN;EuropeanCommission:
Ispra,Italy,2018,doi:10.2760/002447,ISBN9789279985843.
39. Rocha,C.;Almeida,M.;Duarte,P.RegrasdeCategoriadeProduto–LouçaSanitária;DAPHabitat;Aveiro,Portugal;2015.
40. Dias,A.C.;Dias,A.B.;Rocha,C.;Freire,F.;Gervásio,H.;Silvestre,J.;Arroja,L.;Almeida,M.;Duarte,P.;Mateus,R.;etal.Regras
paraaCategoriadeProduto(RCP)–ModeloBase–ProdutoseServiçosdeConstrução.Versão2.0;DAPHabitat;Aveiro,Portugal;2015.
... While numerous LCA studies have been conducted on centralized sanitation systems (Renou 2006;Reverdy & Pradel 2010;Butin et al. 2011;Thibodeau et al. 2014;Risch et al. 2021;Rodrigues et al. 2021), there has been limited research dedicated to on-site systems. Furthermore, existing studies have primarily focused on specific components of the system rather than the entire on-site sanitation system. ...
Article
Full-text available
Low-income tropical regions, such as Haiti, grapple with environmental issues stemming from inadequate sanitation infrastructure for fecal sludge management. This study scrutinizes on-site sanitation systems in these regions, evaluating their environmental impacts and pinpointing improvement opportunities. The focus is specifically on systems integrating excreta valorization through composting and/or anaerobic digestion. Each system encompasses toilet access, evacuation, and sludge treatment. A comparative life cycle assessment was undertaken, with the functional unit managing one ton of excreta in Haiti over a year. Six scenarios representing autonomous sanitation systems were devised by combining three toilet types (container-based toilets (CBTs), ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrines, and flush toilets (WC)) with two sludge treatment processes (composting and biomethanization). Biodigester-based systems exhibited 1.05 times higher sanitary impacts and 1.03 times higher ecosystem impacts than those with composters. Among toilet types, CBTs had the lowest impacts, followed by VIP latrines, with WCs having the highest impacts. On average, WC scenarios were 3.85 times more impactful than VIP latrines and 4.04 times more impactful than those with CBTs regarding human health impact. Critical variables identified include the use of toilet paper, wood shavings, greenhouse gas emissions, and construction materials.
... The study further revealed that electricity generated from fossil fuels is the primary source of emissions. Furthermore, a study by Rodrigues C. et al. [33] performed a comparative LCA of conventional and modern lavatories. In their study, they compared the advantages of employing modern design in five countries, which included Saudi Arabia. ...
Article
Full-text available
The building and construction sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), experiencing rapid growth, is in the early stages of embracing sustainability measures. In the years ahead, the booming building sector in business-as-usual scenarios may pose serious energy and environmental challenges for the Kingdom. This situation will require the Saudi building sector to adopt robust sustainability measures. Embedding life cycle assessment (LCA) as a standard practice can be a useful strategy for improving the energy and environmental footprint of buildings. This paper proposes a theoretical framework within which to promote LCA in the Saudi Arabian construction industry. This framework comprises three pillars: policy, social, and technical. The framework covers the role of the Saudi building sector’s stakeholders such as policy makers, building industry professionals, representatives of relevant governmental bodies, and academics. Adaptation of this LCA framework can help substantially improve the energy and environmental performance of buildings. The proposed LCA framework is aligned with the international as well as the Saudi government’s drive for sustainability in the building sector.
... The study found that the use phase of air conditioners was most detrimental to the environment driven by fossil fuel generated electricity. Third study (Rodrigues et al. 2021) presented a comparative LCA of an innovative toilet and a conventional toilet. This study compared the benefit of using the new design in five different countries including Saudi Arabia. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This paper aims to report the current status of life cycle assessment (LCA) in Saudi Arabia. It summarizes the LCA studies conducted in academia and industry. It also examines LCA collaboration networks and training opportunities. It then points out current gaps in implementing LCA in Saudi Arabia. Finally, it delineates the steps required to promote LCA both as a research methodology and as a sustainability assessment tool in Saudi Arabia. Methods Using Scopus database and the Internet, a state-of-the-art review was conducted for this paper. “LCA”, “Life Cycle Assessment” and “Saudi Arabia” were the key words used for searching scientific studies, industrial reports, training courses and conferences related to application of LCA within Saudi Arabia. The search resulted in 32 scientific documents and one industrial report. Further scrutiny reduced the final sample considered for this paper to eleven scientific documents and one industrial report that used a complete LCA study to report environmental impacts. Results and discussion Studies considered for this paper were related to fossil fuels, buildings, electricity generation, desalination, and food consumption. However, overall number of publications and industry reports related to LCA in Saudi Arabia is very little as compared to other advanced economies. This sheer lack of studies conducted in Saudi Arabia can be attributed to lack of educational programs, consultancies, and research projects related to LCA. This points to the vast potential for developing LCA both as a research tool and sustainability assessment tool in Saudi Arabia. There is a need to develop a local network of LCA researchers, a local LCI database, and training courses. Conclusions This study revealed that use of LCA as a sustainability assessment tool is still in its early stages within Saudi Arabia. There are only a handful of LCA studies that are reported in scientific literature related to Saudi Arabia. Additionally, most of these studies relies on non-local databases rendering the results of these studies less reliable. There is an urgent need to promote LCA within Saudi Arabia and academia can play a leading role by offering short courses, training for industry, and participating in joint projects to conduct LCA studies. Furthermore, local LCA databases and consultancies should also be promoted. It is conjectured that in the future, the use of LCA will grow in Saudi Arabia as the county is targeting to become a net zero carbon economy by 2060.
Article
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) investments have become crucial not only to prevent and recover from pandemics and local outbreaks but also to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance. However, over 2 billion people worldwide still have access to even poor sanitation, which devastates public health and social and economic development. In addition, inadequate sanitation can cause contamination to drinking water sources where exist insufficient protection, exacerbating clean water scarcity. Here, we introduce a femtosecond laser processing technology combined with silicone oil coating to prepare a slippery surface that can repel feces, named the fecalphobic surface. Compared to a flat surface, the fecalphobic surface requires only a quarter amount of water (on average) or even no water to remove sticky viscoelastic solid-like fecal simulants. Besides, various liquids will slide off this surface. Moreover, the simulant slides off the fecalphobic surface much faster than off an untreated one, approximately 3 to 26 times faster depending on their weight. The mechanism of the fast sliding of fecal simulants is explained. Moreover, the fecalphobic surface is installed on a latrine prototype that integrates an automatic trap door and a urine-feces separator for improved sanitation solution.
Article
Full-text available
Emerging photovoltaic technologies are expected to have lower environmental impacts during their life cycle due to their extremely thin-film technology and resulting material savings. The environmental impacts of four emerging photovoltaics were investigated based on a meta-analysis of life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies, comprising a systematic review and harmonization approach of five key indicators to describe the environmental status quo and future prospects. The status quo was analyzed based on a material-related functional unit of 1 watt-peak of the photovoltaic cell. For future prospects, the functional unit of 1 kWh of generated electricity was used, including assumptions on the use phase, notably on the lifetime. The results of the status quo show that organic photovoltaic technology is the most mature emerging photovoltaic technology with a competitive environmental performance, while perovskites have a low performance, attributed to the early stage of development and inefficient manufacturing on the laboratory scale. The results of future prospects identified improvements of efficiency, lifetime, and manufacturing with regard to environmental performance based on sensitivity and scenario analyses. The developed harmonization approach supports the use of LCA in the early stages of technology development in a structured way to reduce uncertainty and extract significant information during development.
Article
Full-text available
The use of plumbing fixtures to promote water saving in the built environment is a common practice in water conservation programs. However, the environmental implications of fixtures replacement should be taken into consideration. This paper analyzes three different scenarios for the provision of water in toilets installed in a university campus. In scenarios 1 and 2, single flush and dual flush devices were installed in the toilets, respectively. In scenario 3, in addition to the installation of dual flush devices, a greywater reuse system from the lavatories was analyzed. The objective is to evaluate, through the Life Cycle Assessment, the environmental aspects related to these scenarios. The economic analysis of the three scenarios was also carried out. Measurements were taken on all plumbing fixtures installed in a building of a university campus in Southern Brazil. The research was conducted using smart meters in two periods: with single flush and dual flush devices installed in toilets. Considering the environmental impacts analyzed, scenario 3 presented lower water and energy consumption in the life cycle. Scenario 2, however, presented lower global warming potential. The net present value results were R23,575.71,R 23,575.71, R 19,091.41, and R$ 22,500.55 for scenarios 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
Article
Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) are innovative tools based on an innovative approach allowing to investigate the environmental and economic burdens of a product or service throughout its lifecycle. Although usually carried out individually, their integration in a comprehensive analysis could provide a substantial asset in every kind of decision-making procedures. In this study, the sustainability of a newly developed component for refrigeration units is investigated by applying these two tools in a cradle to grave approach in different scenarios. Results from the LCA show the huge impact associated with the manufacturing process of the kit compared to the transport. However, the use phase environmental analysis showed an environmental payback period always lower than 10 years. Results from the LCC show that the initial investment cost represents the highest share for the final user. Furthermore, favourable discounted payback periods are generally found, leading to net savings above 270,000 € in the case best-case scenario.
Article
Globally, buildings are recognized as one of the highest users of freshwater resources. Consuming enormous amounts of constructional and operational water deplete water resources and ultimately generates a high environmental impact. This is mainly due to the energy required for the water cycle of built environments, which involves raw water treatment and distribution, use within buildings, and wastewater treatment. Moreover, the impact of water use varies significantly among countries/regions, due to different water use cycles. For example, many countries use conventional water treatments, while others rely on advanced desalination. Unlike building energy use, the impact of water use in buildings has not been captured fully in research. Given the significant impact of water use in buildings and global environmental degradation, we aimed to review studies concentrating on constructional and operational water use and associated environmental impacts, as well as studies that employed life cycle assessment (LCA) on this topic. The review indicated that a limited number of studies have focused on this serious issue in recent years, and their aims differed greatly. Therefore, there is a notable research gap in comprehensive environmental impact assessment including the total human water use cycle. Complete environmental assessment through LCA enables building professionals to understand the wide-ranging impact of water use in a building's life cycle from the environmental perspective in a given region. Additionally, this approach can benefit policymakers setting guidelines for new sustainable water strategies aimed at reducing environmental impacts.
Article
The increasing demand for fresh water has been a global concern for decades. Desalination and water transportation systems consume an ample amount of energy, which also adds to the environmental pollution. This has led to a constant look-out for more viable options to conserve freshwater resources without compromising the environmental quality. The building sectors are remarkably the largest consumers of fresh water in the world; thus, the reclamation and reuse of greywater for non-potable purposes helps to reduce a significant amount of water consumed within a building. This study critically reviews the environmental performance of building-integrated greywater treatment systems compared to the conventional treatment systems deployed. Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the method used to identify the environmental impacts associated with both the systems during their entire life span. The greywater treatment techniques and the guidelines for its reuse are also investigated. The bibliographic analysis was systematic, and the resources for this study were chosen after three stages of quality assessment. The study found physical and biological treatment techniques to be beneficial as they produce excellent quality of treated greywater for reuse. The environmental assessment by various studies prefers the reuse of greywater over its disposal. Guidelines for the reuse of treated greywater have recently been proposed by various countries and building rating systems. This study aims to address the policymakers, governmental and environmental organizations, mainly situated in the water-stressed areas such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, to raise awareness and initiate greywater reuse techniques within residential and commercial building sectors.
Article
Sanitaryware products are one of the most diffused ceramic materials. In the present study, an environmental assessment of sanitaryware production was carried out. The Life Cycle Assessment was performed with a cradle-to-gate approach, considering the product life cycle from resource extraction to the factory gate of an Italian company and it aims to evaluate the environmental weight of sanitaryware production, identifying hotspots and comparing different energetic scenarios. The study was performed according to the current international standards and choosing, as the functional unit, 1000 kg of heterogeneous sanitaryware products. The system boundary includes raw materials extraction, transportation of raw materials and all the manufacturing activities within the factory, including electric and thermal energy supply. The results show how the study factory have implemented a mature green-based manufacturing and represents a reference point to estimate how the environmental impact can be improved by energy saving technologies and recycling water. Such technologies were compared to conventional ones and with results of other recent literature research. In addition, a potential improvement, based on cogeneration, was evaluated to consider if the economic improvement goes together with a minor environmental impact. Results show how economic benefit due to the implementation of cogeneration agrees with environmental impact, presenting only an increase in Global Warming Potential and Abiotic Depletion of fossil fuels. This is the inspiration for a further research where Life Cycle Assessment can be coupled to a Life Cycle Cost.
Article
Natural materials, such as straw bale and earth, have substantially less embodied energy than processed materials, so that their use in building construction can give a valuable contribution to sustainability. This paper presents a natural multi-sheet wall package (named straw wall, SW) consisting of straw bale layer and innovative natural plasters, giving a rational evaluation of its potential of use in the sustainable building construction. The new building component was investigated by analyzing its environmental impact through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) from “Cradle to Gate” and its energy performance using dynamic simulation of a building case study; the energy saving potential of SW was assessed in different climate conditions in Italy. The innovative package highlighted excellent energy performance with respect to the NZEB reference, as prescribed by the Italian regulation, for all climates. Considering only the production and construction phases, the Embodied Energy associated to the innovative wall system is about the half of the value related to a traditional wall package and the CO2 equivalent emissions differ by more than 40%(Pescara site).
Article
This paper reports on the environmental issues associated with the manufacturing of a new insulation material (panel) produced with fibers from Eucalyptus bark. The analyses consider four types of eucalyptus bark panels with different bulk densities (25, 50, 75 and 100 kg/m³). For each type of panel, the environmental impact assessment is performed using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and considering system boundaries from cradle to gate. Major environmental impacts were associated to the panel with a density of 100 kg/m³, due to the higher mass required for the same functional unit (R = 1 m²K/W). The panel manufacturing, forest management and biomass transport were the stages with the highest significance, mainly due to: the contribution of the synthetic fiber used for binding the bark-derived fibers, intensive use of agrochemicals in forest management and long traveled distances for biomass transportation. Furthermore, the eucalyptus bark panels with densities of 25 and 50 kg/m³ shown the lower embodied energy and carbon emissions than traditional insulation materials (expanded polyurethane, polystyrene, glass fibers and glass wool). Therefore, it could be an attractive insulation material for a more sustainable building sector.
Article
Sanitary ware industry consumes vast amounts of energy and materials; however, little is known about the environmental impacts and economic costs associated with the production of sanitary ware. Selecting a factory of a leading Chinese sanitary ware company, Huida Co. Ltd., this paper employs a combined “cradle-to-gate” life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodology to evaluate the environmental impacts and economic costs related to the production of one tonne of sanitary ware. The LCA results indicate firing and drying are the processes with the greatest environmental impacts, attributing to the combustion of coke oven gas. The LCC results show that casting, body preparation and firing are the greatest contributors to the total equipment, material and energy costs, respectively. The results of sensitivity analysis confirm that increasing fuel efficiency, natural gas usage and recycling rates can reduce the overall environmental impacts, but the total costs would be increased by 13.8% if coke oven gas is fully replaced by natural gas, even considering carbon tax. Based on the findings, recommendations such as using green materials and improving energy efficiency, are provided to promote both the environmental and economic sustainability of sanitary ware production.
Article
Water scarcity has become a global issue that has forced many communities to seek alternative water resources. The majority of water on the earth's surface comes from the sea. Seawater has the potential to mitigate water stress after proper treatment. In Hong Kong, seawater has been used directly for toilet flushing for more than 50 years and the seawater toilet flushing (SWTF) system serves 80% of the residents. However, its environmental feasibility remains unknown. This study is a pioneer evaluating the environmental performances of the SWTF system by comparing SWTF with other alternative water resources including desalinated seawater, desalinated wastewater effluent, centralized wastewater reclamation and on-site greywater reclamation systems, while the conventional long-distance imported water scenario is set as the baseline for comparison. This evaluation is first conducted in the Southern District and North New Territory in Hong Kong, demonstrating SWTF is significantly more environmentally-friendly than other alternative water resources, which is the only alternative water resource application approach with environmental impacts comparable with the conventional long-distance imported water scenario. On the contrary, other alternative water resources application approaches would result in additional environmental impacts. Seaside distances and effective population density are two major geographical impact factors effecting the environmental impacts of different water systems in these two districts. The benefits obtained from SWTF in fourteen cities in South China are further investigated. It is confirmed that SWTF can significantly relieve water stress with the lowest environmental impacts comparing with other alternative options in these cities if alternative water resources must be applied for domestic usage. However, the assessment from different aspects should be further conducted to compare these alternative water resources.