ArticlePDF Available

Identification of Novel Candidate Genes and Variants for Hearing Loss and Temporal Bone Anomalies

MDPI
Genes
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Hearing loss remains an important global health problem that is potentially addressed through early identification of a genetic etiology, which helps to predict outcomes of hearing rehabilitation such as cochlear implantation and also to mitigate the long-term effects of comorbidities. The identification of variants for hearing loss and detailed descriptions of clinical phenotypes in patients from various populations are needed to improve the utility of clinical genetic screening for hearing loss. Methods: Clinical and exome data from 15 children with hearing loss were reviewed. Standard tools for annotating variants were used and rare, putatively deleterious variants were selected from the exome data. Results: In 15 children, 21 rare damaging variants in 17 genes were identified, including: 14 known hearing loss or neurodevelopmental genes, 11 of which had novel variants; and three candidate genes IST1, CBLN3 and GDPD5, two of which were identified in children with both hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueducts. Patients with variants within IST1 and MYO18B had poorer outcomes after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of identifying novel variants and genes in ethnic groups that are understudied for hearing loss.
Content may be subject to copyright.
genes
G C A T
T A C G
G C A T
Article
Identification of Novel Candidate Genes and Variants for
Hearing Loss and Temporal Bone Anomalies
Regie Lyn P. Santos-Cortez 1,2,3,*, Talitha Karisse L. Yarza 3,4, Tori C. Bootpetch 1, Ma. Leah C. Tantoco 3,4,5,
Karen L. Mohlke 6, Teresa Luisa G. Cruz 3,5, Mary Ellen Chiong Perez 7, Abner L. Chan 3,5, Nanette R. Lee 8,
Celina Ann M. Tobias-Grasso 9, Maria Rina T. Reyes-Quintos 3,4,5, Eva Maria Cutiongco-de la Paz 10,11
and Charlotte M. Chiong 3,4,5,12,*


Citation: Santos-Cortez, R.L.P.;
Yarza, T.K.L.; Bootpetch, T.C.;
Tantoco, M..L.C.; Mohlke, K.L.;
Cruz, T.L.G.; Chiong Perez, M.E.;
Chan, A.L.; Lee, N.R.;
Tobias-Grasso, C.A.M.; et al.
Identification of Novel Candidate
Genes and Variants for Hearing Loss
and Temporal Bone Anomalies. Genes
2021,12, 566. https://doi.org/
10.3390/genes12040566
Academic Editor:
Selvarangan Ponnazhagan
Received: 26 February 2021
Accepted: 8 April 2021
Published: 13 April 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; tori.bootpetch@cuanschutz.edu
2Center for Children’s Surgery, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
3Philippine National Ear Institute, University of the Philippines (UP) Manila–National Institutes of
Health (NIH), Manila 1000, Philippines; tlyarza@up.edu.ph (T.K.L.Y.); mlct19976@hotmail.com (M.L.C.T.);
tgcruz1@up.edu.ph (T.L.G.C.); alchan@up.edu.ph (A.L.C.); mtreyesquintos@up.edu.ph (M.R.T.R.-Q.)
4Newborn Hearing Screening Reference Center, UP Manila—NIH, Manila 1000, Philippines
5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, UP Manila College of Medicine—Philippine General
Hospital (UP-PGH), Manila 1000, Philippines
6Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; mohlke@med.unc.edu
7Department of Anesthesiology, UP Manila College of Medicine, Manila 1000, Philippines;
mcperez6@up.edu.ph
8Office of Population Studies and Department of Anthropology, Sociology and History,
University of San Carlos, Cebu City 6000, Philippines; nanette_rlee@yahoo.com
9MED-EL, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; celina.tobias-grasso@med-el.com
10 Institute of Human Genetics, UP Manila—NIH, Manila 1000, Philippines; eccutiongcodelapaz@up.edu.ph
11 Philippine Genome Center, UP Diliman Campus, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
12 UP Manila College of Medicine, Manila 1000, Philippines
*Correspondence: regie.santos-cortez@cuanschutz.edu; (R.L.P.S.-C.); cmchiong@up.edu.ph (C.M.C.)
Abstract:
Background: Hearing loss remains an important global health problem that is potentially
addressed through early identification of a genetic etiology, which helps to predict outcomes of
hearing rehabilitation such as cochlear implantation and also to mitigate the long-term effects of
comorbidities. The identification of variants for hearing loss and detailed descriptions of clinical
phenotypes in patients from various populations are needed to improve the utility of clinical genetic
screening for hearing loss. Methods: Clinical and exome data from 15 children with hearing loss were
reviewed. Standard tools for annotating variants were used and rare, putatively deleterious variants
were selected from the exome data. Results: In 15 children, 21 rare damaging variants in 17 genes
were identified, including: 14 known hearing loss or neurodevelopmental genes, 11 of which had
novel variants; and three candidate genes IST1,CBLN3 and GDPD5, two of which were identified in
children with both hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueducts. Patients with variants within IST1
and MYO18B had poorer outcomes after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight
the importance of identifying novel variants and genes in ethnic groups that are understudied for
hearing loss.
Keywords:
anomalies; CBLN3; cochlear implant; enlarged vestibular aqueduct; GDPD5; genetic
testing; hearing loss; inner ear; IST1; malformations; temporal bone
1. Introduction
Hearing loss remains a public health burden worldwide, with global measures of the
effects of hearing disability remaining steady over the past three decades [
1
]. With the
use of sequencing technologies in the clinical setting, identification of genetic variants that
predispose to congenital or early childhood hearing loss is becoming more accessible to a
Genes 2021,12, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040566 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes
Genes 2021,12, 566 2 of 16
larger segment of the world population. When partnered with newborn hearing screening,
massively parallel DNA sequencing holds the promise of identifying the genetic cause(s)
of hearing loss at the earliest stage and can therefore guide the clinician in diagnosing and
treating comorbidities, planning rehabilitative options such as hearing aids or cochlear
implantation (CI), and when they become available, applying gene therapies [
2
,
3
]. Genetic
hearing loss is a highly heterogeneous disease both in terms of clinical presentation and
pathogenic DNA variants, which are usually rare and may lie within any one of hundreds
of genes [
2
,
4
]. The identification of variants for hearing loss and their corresponding clinical
profiles in patients from various populations will contribute to the large body of knowledge
that is required to improve the utility of clinical genetic screening for hearing loss. A large
community of clinicians and scientists continues to identify novel genes and variants for
syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss. In the past two years alone, variants within
novel hearing loss genes including SLC9A3R1,ANLN,FOXF2,TOP2B,PLS1,PISD,CLRN2,
AP1B1,SCD5,GGPS1,SLC12A2,THOC1 and GREB1L were identified in patients of various
ethnicities [
5
22
]. To date, some of these genes remain candidates that require replication
in additional hearing loss families and patients [6,9,14,19].
Compared to hundreds of known hearing loss genes, studies on the genetic causes
of temporal bone malformations are limited, with only a few genes identified so far, to
name a few: EVA and/or Mondini dysplasia and SLC26A4; superior semicircular canal
dehiscence (SSCD) or posterior semicircular canal dehiscence (PSCD) and CDH23; and
variable cochleovestibular anomalies in some patients with variants in GJB2,POU3F4,
SOX10,CHD7,SIX1 and GREB1L [
20
29
]. Prior knowledge of temporal bone malforma-
tions is important not only to prepare the surgeon for potential complications during CI
but also to prognosticate outcomes after surgery [
29
31
]. Because CI is performed as early
as three months old, occurrence of temporal bone anomalies might also be predicted earlier
if genetic testing is performed at neonatal stage.
We previously studied a cohort of Filipino patients with hearing loss requiring
CI
[3234].
In this cohort, we identified variants in known hearing loss genes in half of the
patients, including a recurrent variant SLC26A4 c.706C>G (p.Leu236Val) that was associ-
ated with bilaterally enlarged vestibular aqueducts (EVA) [
32
34
]. Of eleven patients with
previously identified non-SLC26A4 variants, only three had inner ear anomalies, including:
EVA in a patient with an EYA4 variant; and SSCD in one patient with a KCNQ4 variant, and
in another patient with CHARGE syndrome due to a CHD7 variant [
32
,
34
]. On the other
hand, of the genetically unsolved cases, 75% had temporal bone anomalies (Table 1) [
33
].
In this study, we reviewed the clinical and exome data of Filipino cochlear implantees and
identified 12 novel variants in known genes for hearing loss and/or neurodevelopmental
syndromes, as well as three candidate genes for hearing loss.
Table 1. Clinical data for 15 Filipino children with hearing loss requiring cochlear implants (CI).
ID Age at CI (yr) Sex Temporal Bone Findings Clinical History Gene
1 3.95 M EVA, L
Bilateral small choroidal
fissure cysts and a probable
neuroepithelial cyst or
prominent perivascular space
involving the right peri-atrial
white matter (MRI).
DSPP
3 2.83 M
Malformed cochleae with
incomplete cochlear turns, B.
EVA, L.
Global developmental delay LMX1A
Genes 2021,12, 566 3 of 16
Table 1. Cont.
ID Age at CI (yr) Sex Temporal Bone Findings Clinical History Gene
5 3.84 F HJB with dehiscence, L
Prenatal antibiotic use for
maternal respiratory infection.
Patient used antibiotics in
neonatal period for
unspecified infection. Has
pervasive
developmental delay.
DMXL2
6 10.81 M PSCD + HJB, B. EVA, R. Pneumonia, sinusitis, and
progressive hearing loss PTPRQ
7 8.00 F HJB, L. OM, L.
Mild motor delay and
hypotonia. History of urinary
and upper respiratory tract
infections.
MYO7A;
PCDH15/CDH23
8 3.03 M SSCD, L U/R COL11A1; TECTA
9 8.19 F EVA, L
Mother had urinary tract
infection and eclampsia
during pregnancy
IST1
13 5.95 M Normal Global developmental delay SLC12A2
18 2.77 M Normal
Sepsis and
antibiotic/amikacin use
during neonatal period
MYO7A
19 5.66 F
Malformed cochleae,
vestibules and semi-circular
canals, B. Absent cochlear and
inferior vestibular nerves, R.
Maternal diabetes at 6 months
gestation MYO18B
20 14.59 F Normal
Fluctuating hearing loss with
steeply sloping audiogram
prior to CI. Turbinate
hypertrophy, allergic rhinitis,
nasopharyngeal nodule.
CLDN9
22 4.40 F Normal U/R GREB1L; CBLN3
23 4.61 F Normal U/R CDH23; MYO18B
24 6.10 M EVA, B
Fever, jaundice, foul umbilical
discharge and apneic episodes
with antibiotics and
phototherapy in neonatal
period
FLNA
27 7.72 F EVA, B. OM, L. U/R GDPD5
M, male; F, female; U/R, unremarkable; B, bilateral; L, left; R, right; EVA, enlarged vestibular aqueduct; HJB, high jugular bulb; OM, otitis
media; PSCD, posterior semicircular canal dehiscence; SSCD, superior semicircular canal dehiscence.
2. Materials and Methods
Out of our initial cohort of 30 Filipino patients, we previously identified a genetic vari-
ant as causal of hearing loss in 15 patients [
32
34
]. For this study, we reviewed the clinical
records and temporal bone images of 15 Filipino cochlear implantees for whom no variants
in known hearing loss genes were identified previously (Table 1) [
34
]. High-resolution
computed tomography with 2–3 mm axial cuts and without contrast was performed using
a Siemens Somatom Plus 4 CT Scanner in order to document temporal bone anomalies.
DNA samples were submitted for exome sequencing at the University of Washington
Northwest Genomics Center, as previously described [
33
,
34
]. The Roche NimbleGen Se-
qCap EZ Human Exome Library v.2.0 (~37 Mb target) was used for sequence capture,
Genes 2021,12, 566 4 of 16
and sequencing was performed using an Illumina HiSeq to an average depth of 30
×
.
Fastq files were aligned to the hg19 human reference sequence using Burrows-Wheeler
Aligner, generating demultiplexed .bam files [
35
]. The Genome Analysis Tool Kit was
used for realignment of indel regions (IndelRealigner), variant quality score recalibration
(VQSR) and variant detection and calling, as well as generation of standard metrics used
for quality control (QC) during exome analyses [
36
]. Low-quality and likely false-positive
variants were flagged. The initial .vcf file for 29 GJB2-negative individuals included 82,853
variants, of which 74,965 passed QC filters. Variants from the entire .vcf file were annotated
using ANNOVAR (annovar.openbioinformatics.org, last accessed March 18, 2021) [
37
].
Indels from the exome sequence data were also annotated using MutationTaster [
38
], how-
ever no rare or low-frequency variants were identified as potentially deleterious in the
15 patients studied.
Single nucleotide variants that passed QC were initially selected if they: (a) were
homozygous or heterozygous in the 15 children with no known genetic etiology of hear-
ing loss; (b) were stop, splice or missense variants; (c) had a minor allele frequency
(MAF) <0.005 in any gnomAD (gnomad.broadinstitute.org, last accessed 31 March 2021),
1000 Genomes or Greater Middle East (GME) Variome population [
4
,
39
,
40
]; (d) from the
Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD; cadd.gs.washington.edu, last ac-
cessed 31 March 2021) pre-computed scores database, had a scaled CADD score of
15 [
41
];
and (e) was predicted to be deleterious by at least one bioinformatics tool from db-
SNFP41a [
42
]. Variants were excluded if they were common across our cohort, particularly
if occurring within genes not previously associated with hearing loss but are found in
multiple individuals that were identified to have variants in known genes for hearing
loss [
32
34
]. This selection strategy resulted in a shorter list of 2570 variants, which was
parsed further by prioritizing any variant that: (a) lies within a known hearing loss gene;
(b) is a loss-of-function variant; (c) lies within a potentially novel gene but is homozygous
or with two variants in the same gene in the same individual; and/or (d) lies within a gene
that is identified in a mouse model with hearing loss. A list of 120 variants were rechecked
against equivalent hg38 databases. Additional MAF checking was performed using the
GenomeAsia 100K database (genomeasia100k.org, last accessed March 31, 2021) [
43
]. For
known hearing loss genes, variants were ruled out if they occurred in a gene in which phe-
notypes are expressed only in homozygous or compound heterozygous individuals and the
patient genotype is heterozygous. For the final list of 89 variants (Table S1), the Integrative
Genomics Viewer v2.8.3 was used to visualize variants from exome sequence data [44].
3. Results
Of the 15 children studied, six had EVA, three with high jugular bulb (HJB), two
with SSCD/PSCD and two with malformed cochleae (Figure 1; Table 1). Five children
had normal temporal bone CT/MRI images. From clinical history, seven children had
exposures to infections and antibiotics, whether prenatally, at the neonatal stage or during
early childhood (Table 1), suggesting that the previous infections or antibiotic use may have
also played a role in their hearing loss etiology. Prior to CI, hearing loss in the 15 children
was congenital, prelingual and severe-to-profound across frequencies, except for: (a) ID6
who had progressive hearing loss; and (b) ID20 who had fluctuating hearing loss with a
steeply sloping audiogram and profound hearing loss at the high frequencies (Table 1).
Genes 2021,12, 566 5 of 16
Genes 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 15
was congenital, prelingual and severe-to-profound across frequencies, except for: (a) ID6
who had progressive hearing loss; and (b) ID20 who had fluctuating hearing loss with a
steeply sloping audiogram and profound hearing loss at the high frequencies (Table 1).
Figure 1. Temporal bone images in six patients with hearing loss. (A) ID1 with the heterozygous DSPP c.730G>A
(p.(Gly244Arg)) variant has enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA, arrow) on the left. (B,C) ID3 with the heterozygous
LMX1A and COL2A1 variants has bilaterally malformed cochleae with incomplete cochlear turns (plus signs) and left-
sided EVA (arrow). (D) ID5 with the heterozygous DMXL2 variant has a high jugular bulb (HJB, asterisk) on the left. (E)
ID7 with the heterozygous MYO7A variant plus potentially compound heterozygous PCDH15 and CDH23 variants has
HJB (asterisk) on the left. There is also fluid in the middle ear space (marked by X), indicating otitis media. (F,G) ID8 with
the heterozygous COL11A1 and TECTA variants has left-sided superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD, hash sign).
(H,I) ID19 with the heterozygous MYO18B c.2555C>T (p.(Ala852)) variant has multiple congenital inner ear anomalies
with bilaterally malformed cochleae, vestibules and semicircular canals (plus signs), as well as absence of the right cochlear
and inferior vestibular nerves.
A total of 21 rare/low-frequency potentially deleterious variants were identified in 17
genes (Tables 1 and 2), all of which are known to be expressed in the mouse cochlea
(gEAR, umgear.org, last accessed March 31, 2021). Although majority of the variants were
heterozygous with likely autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance, several variants had
seemingly different modes of inheritance, such as: (1) a homozygous CLDN9 variant in
ID20; (2) potentially compound heterozygous variants in GDPD5, PCDH15 and/or CDH23
in three children; and (3) an X-linked variant in FLNA in male patient ID24 (Table S1).
While our knowledge of mode of inheritance of these variants is limited, for five individ-
uals the available history matches either an autosomal recessive (AR) pattern or AD in-
heritance with decreased penetrance (Table S1). A more detailed genotype-phenotype cor-
relation per gene and patient is hereby presented.
DSPP: Variants in DSPP (MIM 125485; 4q22.1) were first identified as a cause of AD
hearing loss DFNA39 with dentinogenesis (MIM 605594) in Chinese families with den-
tinogenesis imperfecta 1 and adult-onset progressive sensorineural high-frequency hear-
ing loss [45]. Additional hearing loss families, all of East Asian ethnicity, have been iden-
tified to have splice or missense variants within the first five exons of DSPP [46–48]. In the
reported families, there was variability in age of onset, affected hearing frequencies, se-
verity of hearing loss, and symptoms of tinnitus or balance problems [45–48]. In one fam-
ily, the affected individuals had congenital hearing loss and bilateral cochlear defects with
or without EVA [47]. In our study, patient ID1 had congenital hearing loss and unilateral
EVA (Table 1; Figure 1). He was heterozygous for a novel variant c.730G>A
Figure 1.
Temporal bone images in six patients with hearing loss. (
A
) ID1 with the heterozygous DSPP c.730G>A
(p.(Gly244Arg)) variant has enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA, arrow) on the left. (
B
,
C
) ID3 with the heterozygous LMX1A
and COL2A1 variants has bilaterally malformed cochleae with incomplete cochlear turns (plus signs) and left-sided EVA
(arrow). (
D
) ID5 with the heterozygous DMXL2 variant has a high jugular bulb (HJB, asterisk) on the left. (
E
) ID7 with the
heterozygous MYO7A variant plus potentially compound heterozygous PCDH15 and CDH23 variants has HJB (asterisk) on
the left. There is also fluid in the middle ear space (marked by X), indicating otitis media. (
F
,
G
) ID8 with the heterozygous
COL11A1 and TECTA variants has left-sided superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD, hash sign). (
H
,
I
) ID19 with
the heterozygous MYO18B c.2555C>T (p.(Ala852)) variant has multiple congenital inner ear anomalies with bilaterally
malformed cochleae, vestibules and semicircular canals (plus signs), as well as absence of the right cochlear and inferior
vestibular nerves.
A total of 21 rare/low-frequency potentially deleterious variants were identified in
17 genes (Tables 1and 2), all of which are known to be expressed in the mouse cochlea
(gEAR, umgear.org, last accessed March 31, 2021). Although majority of the variants
were heterozygous with likely autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance, several variants had
seemingly different modes of inheritance, such as: (1) a homozygous CLDN9 variant in
ID20; (2) potentially compound heterozygous variants in GDPD5, PCDH15 and/or CDH23
in three children; and (3) an X-linked variant in FLNA in male patient ID24 (Table S1). While
our knowledge of mode of inheritance of these variants is limited, for five individuals the
available history matches either an autosomal recessive (AR) pattern or AD inheritance
with decreased penetrance (Table S1). A more detailed genotype-phenotype correlation
per gene and patient is hereby presented.
Genes 2021,12, 566 6 of 16
Table 2. Novel variants and candidate genes 1for hearing loss and temporal bone anomalies.
ID Gene Variant rsID gnomAD GenomeAsia 100k
SEA 2Scaled CADD Damaging Results from
dbNSFP Tools
1DSPP NM_014208: c.730G>A
(p.(Gly244Arg)) 1044690454 NA 0.0014 24.3
FA,mLR,mSVM, MT,PP2,SI
3LMX1A NM_177398: c.606G>C
(p.(Leu202Phe)) NA NA NA 24.8 FA,LRT,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2, PR,SI
5DMXL2 NM_015263: c.257T>C
(p.(Leu86Ser)) 761692429 OTH: 0.0005 NA 24.1 LRT,MT,PP2,SI
6PTPRQ NM_001145026: c.6179T>C
(p.(Val2060Ala)) 375150180 EAS: 0.00097 0.017 27.8 MT,SI
7PCDH15/CDH23
NM_001354411: c.3787C>T
(p.(Pro1263Ser)); NM_022124:
c.3262G>A (p.(Val1088Met))
775954124; 200632520
EAS: 0.004; EAS:
0.002 NA; 0.003 24.9; 24.3
MA,MT,PP2,PR, SI;
LRT,MA,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2,SI
23 CDH23
NM_022124: c.437C>T
(p.(Pro146Leu)); c.3262G>A
(p.(Val1088Met)); c.6911G>A
(p.(Arg2304Gln))
765103490;
200632520; 201434373
NA; EAS:
0.002; EAS:
0.0015
0.001; 0.003; 0.007 24.7; 24.3; 22.7
LRT,MT,PP2,PR, SI;
LRT,MA,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2,SI; MT,SI
7, 18 MYO7A NM_000260: c.4921G>A
(p.(Glu1741Lys)) 767975012 EAS: 0.0002 0.003 26.2 LRT,MT,PP2,PR
8COL11A1 NM_080629: c.4364A>C
(p.(Lys1455Thr)) 769350133 EAS: 0.0004 NA 28.6 FA,LRT,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2, PR,SI
8TECTA NM_005422: c.2967C>A
(p.(His989Gln) 200821009 EAS: 0.003 0.0014 20.4 FA,LRT,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2, PR,SI
9IST1 NM_001270976: c.737C>G
(p.(Pro246Arg)) 774343604 EAS: 0.0002 NA 24.0 LRT,MT,PP2,PR, SI
13 SLC12A2 NM_001046: c.2977G>T
(p.(Glu993*)) NA NA NA 60.0 MT
19 MYO18B NM_032608: c.2555C>T
(p.(Ala852Val)) NA NA NA 26.1 FA,LRT,mLR,
mSVM,MA,MT, PP2,PR,SI
23 MYO18B NM_032608: c.1982G>A
(p.(Trp661*) 372939044 AFR: 0.0005 NA 44.0 LRT/MT
Genes 2021,12, 566 7 of 16
Table 2. Cont.
ID Gene Variant rsID gnomAD GenomeAsia 100k
SEA 2Scaled CADD Damaging Results from
dbNSFP Tools
20 CLDN9 NM_020982: c.75C>G
(p.(Cys25Trp)) 368045321 OTH: 0.0005 0.004 20.6 FA,LRT,MA,mLR,
mSVM,MT,PP2, PR,SI
20, 24 FLNA NM_001110556: c.6350A>G
(p.(Asn2117Ser)) 375205247 EAS: 0.002 NA 20.2 FA,LRT,MT,PR
22 GREB1L NM_001142966: c.3798C>G
(p.(Ser1266Arg)) 954005555 EAS: 0.0006 0.003 16.6 LRT,MA,MT,PR, SI
22 CBLN3
NM_001039771:
c.550C>T
(p.(Arg184Cys))
562291434 EAS: 0.0002 NA 32.0 LRT,MT,PP2,PR, SI
27 GDPD5
NM_030792: c.554G>A
(p.(Arg185His)); c.404C>T
(p.(Thr135Met))
745585758; 373413383
ME: 0.003; AFR:
0.00002
0 (South Asia =
0.0007); NA 23.1; 24.8 LRT,MT,PP2;
LRT,MA,MT,PP2
1
. Bold font denotes candidate genes, while novel variants in known genes are in italics.
2
. Variants identified in the Southeast Asian (SEA) population in the GenomeAsia 100k database were mostly from
individuals of Filipino (n= 52) or Indonesian (n= 68) descent. MAF from Filipino alleles were identified in indigenous Negrito (Ati, Aeta) tribes, which are usually intermarried and are not representative of
the general Filipino population. NA, not available/found; EAS, East Asian; AFR, African; ME, Middle Eastern; OTH, other; FA, FATHMM; LRT, likelihood ratio test; mLR, meta-logistic regression; mSVM,
meta-support vector machine; MA, MutationAssessor; MT, MutationTaster; PP2, PolyPhen2; PR, PROVEAN; SI, SIFT.
Genes 2021,12, 566 8 of 16
DSPP: Variants in DSPP (MIM 125485; 4q22.1) were first identified as a cause of
AD hearing loss DFNA39 with dentinogenesis (MIM 605594) in Chinese families with
dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 and adult-onset progressive sensorineural high-frequency
hearing loss [
45
]. Additional hearing loss families, all of East Asian ethnicity, have been
identified to have splice or missense variants within the first five exons of DSPP [
46
48
]. In
the reported families, there was variability in age of onset, affected hearing frequencies,
severity of hearing loss, and symptoms of tinnitus or balance problems [
45
48
]. In one
family, the affected individuals had congenital hearing loss and bilateral cochlear defects
with or without EVA [
47
]. In our study, patient ID1 had congenital hearing loss and
unilateral EVA (Table 1; Figure 1). He was heterozygous for a novel variant c.730G>A
(p.(Gly244Arg)), which lies within exon 4 of DSPP (Table 2). Although we have no record
of dental abnormalities, he had small cysts identified in his brain MRI (Table 1). Dspp
is expressed in inner ear, brain and pericytes of blood vessels in dental pulp of mice,
and also in zebrafish otoliths [
45
,
49
,
50
]. He also has additional variants in ANLN (MIM
616027; 7p14.2), ZNF462 (MIM 617371; 9q31.2),and CEP290 (MIM 610142; 12q21.32).
Each of these three genes harbor variants previously associated with hearing loss in
various syndromes (Table S1): branchio-otic syndrome with ossicular chain anomalies for
ANLN [6]; Weiss-Kruszka syndrome with craniofacial dysmorphisms and developmental
delay for ZNF462 [
51
]; and Joubert syndrome with cerebral, retinal and kidney disease for
CEP290 [
52
]. While we cannot rule out if ID4
0
s brain cysts are related to these syndromic
genes (e.g., kidney cysts are common in individuals with CEP290 variants) [
52
], the other
features of these syndromes are absent in patient ID1. Overall, the DSPP variant in ID6 fits
his inner ear findings.
LMX1A: In addition to hearing loss, ID3 has malformed cochleae, left-sided EVA and
global developmental delay (Figure 1; Table 1). Both the hearing loss and bony cochlear
defects may be explained by novel heterozygous variants in two genes, namely LMX1A
(MIM 600298; 1q23.3) c.606G>C (p.(Leu202Phe)) and/or COL2A1 (MIM 120140; 12q13.11)
c.3569G>A (p.(Arg1190His)) (Table 2and Table S1). LMX1A is known for AD or AR
nonsyndromic hearing loss [
53
,
54
], while COL2A1 is related to Stickler syndrome type 1
with hearing loss (MIM 108300) as well as various skeletal phenotypes [
55
]. Homozygous
Lmx1a-mutant mice lack endolymphatic ducts and have short cochlear ducts [
56
], which
seem to recapitulate the incomplete cochlear turns and EVA in patient ID2. Additionally,
hair cell loss and disorganization were seen in the cochleae of mutant mice [
57
]. However,
unlike the deaf homozygous mice, the Lmx1a-heterozygous mice had normal hearing [
56
].
In contrast, two Dutch families with heterozygous missense LMX1A variants had mild-
to-profound hearing loss of variable onset from infancy to adulthood [
53
]. On the other
hand, a transgenic Col2a1-mutant mouse model had a smaller misshapen otic capsule
as well as craniofacial abnormalities such as cleft palate and short mandible [
58
]; these
latter features were not found in our patient ID3. In patient ID3, two variants in USH2A
(MIM 608400; 1q41) were previously ruled out due to high MAF in the general Filipino
population and lack of retinitis pigmentosa after years of follow-up (Table S1). There were
three other interesting variants in ID3 (Table S1): (a) heterozygous missense variant in
ZFHX4 (MIM 606940; 8q21.13)–ZFHX4 is one of two genes within the minimum region of
overlap in patients with 8q21 microdeletions manifesting with intellectual and develop-
mental disability, sensorineural hearing loss, craniofacial anomalies and hypotonia [
59
,
60
];
(b) heterozygous missense variant in NRP1–the Nrp1
+/
mouse has abnormal auditory
brainstem responses (ABR), progressive hearing loss, disorganized outer spiral bundles
and enlarged microvessels of the stria vascularis [
61
]; and (c) a hemizygous missense
variant in ARHGAP4 (MIM 300023; Xq28), in which missense variants were previously
described in children with intellectual disability [
62
,
63
]. This case shows potential overlap
of clinical presentation due to multiple deleterious variants, of which the LMX1A variant
is the strongest etiology of inner ear abnormalities in this patient while the ZFHX4 or
ARHGAP4 variants may explain ID30s developmental delay.
Genes 2021,12, 566 9 of 16
DMXL2: DMXL2 (MIM 612186; 15q21.2) was recently identified to have missense vari-
ants causing AD nonsyndromic hearing loss in Chinese and Cameroonian families [
64
,
65
].
In these families, the affected individuals were mostly adult with progressive hearing
loss and no reported temporal bone abnormalities, although one Cameroonian child had
congenital profound hearing loss [
65
]. Our patient ID5 has a novel heterozygous DMXL2
variant c.257T>C (p.(Leu86Ser)) (Table 2). In addition to prelingual profound hearing loss,
her temporal bone CT showed a left HJB with evidence of dehiscence (Figure 1). She also
had a history of neonatal infection as well as pervasive developmental delay
(Table 1).
In
mice, cochlear expression of Dmxl2 is limited to the hair cells and spiral ganglion neu-
rons [
64
], and Dmxl2-knockout leads to preweaning lethality in the homozygous mouse
and decreased bone mineral content if heterozygous (International Mouse Phenotyping
Consortium (IMPC), www.mousephenotype.org, last accessed March 31, 2021). It is pos-
sible that the temporal bone findings are also an effect of the Dmxl2 variant in ID5
0
s case.
Biallelic loss-of-function DMXL2 variants are also known to cause Ohtahara syndrome
characterized by neurologic deficits including intellectual disability, developmental delay,
hearing loss, polyneuropathy and also facial dysmorphisms [
66
]. However because patient
ID5 only has a heterozygous DMXL2 variant, the developmental delay may also be due
to other causes, such as variants in CCDC186 (MIM 619249; 10q25.3), ZRF2 or MCM3AP
(MIM 603294; 21q22.3) (Table S1).
PTPRQ: PTPRQ (MIM 603317; 12q21.3) is a known cause of AD (MIM 617663) or AR
(MIM 613391) nonsyndromic hearing loss in families and probands with multiple ethnic-
ities, which may be variable in clinical presentation [
67
,
68
]. Patient ID6 is heterozygous
for a novel missense variant c.6179T>C (p.(Val2060Ala)) within PTPRQ (Table 2). He also
has progressive hearing loss, bilateral PSCD and HJB and right-sided EVA as temporal
bone findings, as well as previous pneumonia and sinusitis (Table 1). In general previ-
ous reports of PTPRQ-related hearing loss excluded temporal bone anomalies, however
narrowed internal auditory canals were found in a Chinese proband with compound
heterozygous PTPRQ variants [
69
]. We previously ruled out a heterozygous variant in
TCOF1 (MIM 606847; 5q32-q33) due to lack of clinically diagnosed craniofacial hallmarks
of AD Treacher-Collins syndrome (MIM 154500), but upon review, we cannot rule out
that the TCOF1 variant also contributes to hearing loss and temporal bone anomalies, as
was previously described (Table S1) [
70
]. Lastly a heterozygous variant in DNAH14 (MIM
603341; 1q42.12), a candidate gene for primary ciliary dyskinesia and lung function in
cystic fibrosis (Table S1) [
71
,
72
], may play a role in ID6
0
s susceptibility to airway infections.
PCDH15, CDH23 and MYO7A: While these three genes are known for Usher syndrome,
they have AR nonsyndromic forms of hearing loss. In addition, MYO7A (MIM 276903;
11q13.5) variants may be inherited in an AD manner, while digenic inheritance for PCDH15
(MIM 605514; 10q21.1) and CDH23 (MIM 605516; 10q22.1) were demonstrated in mice
and humans [
73
]. ID7 has hearing loss, HJB, mild motor delay, hypotonia, and urinary
and upper respiratory infections (Figure 1; Table S1). She has multiple variants of interest,
but the strongest findings are compound heterozygous PCDH15/CDH23 variants plus a
heterozygous MYO7A variant (Table 2). Interestingly, the same MYO7A variant c.4921G>A
(p.(Glu1461Lys)) is heterozygous in another patient ID18, who has nonsyndromic hearing
loss (Table 2). This may suggest that the additional variants in ID7 contribute to her
variable phenotype (Table S1). Patient ID23 also has nonsyndromic hearing loss and three
CDH23 variants, however we could not confirm if these CDH23 variants are compound
heterozygous or inherited in cis due lack of available parental DNA (Table 2). These
CDH23 and MYO7A variants are reported as variants of unknown significance (VUS) in
ClinVar (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/, last accessed 31 March 2021), while the PCDH15
c.3787C>T (p.(Pro1263Ser)) variant is novel.
COL11A1: ID8 has hearing loss, left-sided SSCD, and heterozygous missense variants in
two genes known for AD nonsyndromic hearing loss, namely COL11A1 (MIM 120280; 1p21.1)
and TECTA (MIM 602574; 11q23.3) (Tables 1and 2; Figure 1). Of the two deleterious variants,
the COL11A1 c.4364A>C (p.(Lys1455Thr)) variant is rarer (
gnomAD EAS MAF = 0.0004
). Pre-
Genes 2021,12, 566 10 of 16
vious reports on COL11A1 or TECTA did not reveal inner ear abnormalities in patients with
variants [74,75].
IST1: ID9 with profound hearing loss and left-sided EVA is heterozygous for a
c.737C>G (p.(Pro246Arg)) variant in IST1 (MIM 616434; 16q22.2). This rare deleterious
variant (Table 2) was singled out due to a heterozygous Ist1 mouse model that had abnor-
mal ABR in early adulthood (IMPC). In mouse cochlea, Ist1 is expressed in both hair cells
and supporting cells (gEAR). Recently de novo VPS4A variants were identified to cause a
multi-systemic neurodevelopmental disorder including sensorineural hearing loss due to
the abnormal accumulation of IST1 protein in the limiting membrane of proband-derived
fibroblasts and also in neuronal endosomes [
76
], suggesting that proper localization of
IST1 is required for neuronal function. Taken together, our findings make IST1 an excellent
candidate gene for nonsyndromic hearing loss. Moreover, ID9 had poor CI outcomes, such
as average CI-aided hearing threshold of 74 dB and speech tests using PEACH scores at
10–21%. Identification of additional patients with IST1 variants is needed to verify these
CI outcomes.
SLC12A2: ID13 who has hearing loss and global developmental delay is heterozygous
for a novel stop variant c.2977G>T (p.(Glu993*)) in SLC12A2 (also NKCC1; MIM 600840;
5q23.3) (Tables 1and 2). SLC12A2 variants have been identified in patients with AD
nonsyndromic hearing loss (MIM 619081), with AD Delpire-McNeill syndrome (MIM
619083), or AR Kilquist syndrome (MIM 619080). Recently McNeill et al. identified
heterozygous SLC12A2 variants in eight mostly pediatric patients with intellectual disability
or developmental delay, and ~60% had bilateral sensorineural hearing loss [
18
]. Previous
homozygous knockout of Slc12a2 in mice led to loss of hearing and vestibular function,
collapse of Reissner’s membrane, disorganization of the organ of Corti, and loss of hair
cells and supporting cells [
77
]. On the other hand, heterozygous deletion of Slc12a2 in
mice resulted in early hearing loss that progressed with age despite normal inner ear
morphology and histology [78].
MYO18B: Two patients had variants in MYO18B (MIM 607295, 22q12.1). Patient
ID23 with nonsyndromic hearing loss has potentially compound heterozygous CDH23
variants and also a novel heterozygous MYO18B variant c.1982G>A (p.(Trp661*))
(Table 2).
The other patient ID19 has another novel variant c.2555C>T (p.(Ala852Val)) and severe
cochleovestibular defects (Figure 1). In patient ID19, no other strong candidate variants
or genes were identified (Table S1). MYO18B variants were previously associated with
autosomal recessive Klippel-Feil syndrome (MIM 616549) which is characterized by ne-
maline myopathy, facial dysmorphisms and hearing loss in up to 60% of patients [
79
].
Heterozygous Myo18b-knockout mice had abnormal ABR findings (IMPC), further support-
ing the role of heterozygous MYO18B variants in the etiology of hearing loss. Patients with
hearing loss as part of Klippel-Feil syndrome were also diagnosed with inner ear dysplasias
including internal acoustic canal deformities [
80
], which are similar to the temporal bone
anomalies found in patient ID19 (Figure 1). Of the 30 Filipino patients, ID19 and ID23
who carry MYO18B variants had poorer outcomes after CI, with PEACH scores whether in
quiet or noise at 4–37% despite average post-CI thresholds of ~40 dB at 0.25–8 kHz. This
is not unexpected given potential cochlear nerve defects [
30
,
31
] that might not have been
diagnosed radiologically (Figure 1). For ID19, her PEACH scores improved to >80% after
5 years of continued use of her implant on the left ear.
FLNA: The same FLNA (MIM 300017; Xq28) variant c.6350A>G (p.(Asn2117Ser)) that is
classified as VUS in ClinVar was identified in two children ID20 and ID24 (Table 2). ID24 is
male, hemizygous for the FLNA variant and has no other rare damaging variants in hearing
loss genes. He is hemizygous for a known pathogenic variant in G6PD (MIM 305900; Xq28)
which may explain his neonatal jaundice (Table 1and Table S1). FLNA is associated with
multiple disorders, of which frontometaphyseal dysplasia (MIM 305620), Melnick-Needles
syndrome (MIM 309350) and otopalatodigital syndrome (MIM 311300/304120) have been
reported to include sensorineural hearing loss. ID24 has EVA in addition to the hearing loss
but has no detailed assessment of additional skeletal anomalies; meanwhile temporal bone
Genes 2021,12, 566 11 of 16
anomalies have been reported previously in a patient with Melnick–Needles syndrome [
81
].
On the other hand, the female patient ID20 who is heterozygous for the same FLNA variant
has additional variants as the cause of hearing loss (Table S1).
CLDN9: ID20 has fluctuating hearing loss at the high frequencies and additional
sinonasal findings (Table 1). In addition to the FLNA variant, she is homozygous for a
novel variant c.75C>G (p.(Cys25Trp)) in CLDN9 (MIM 615799; 16p13.3) and heterozygous
for ANKRD11 (MIM 611192; 16q24.3) (Table 2and Table S1). KBG syndrome (MIM 148050)
due to heterozygous ANKRD11 variants manifests variably as macrodontia, intellectual
disability and skeletal/craniofacial defects, including conductive or mixed hearing loss–
these features do not fit the patient’s clinical presentation [
82
]. In contrast, a CLDN9
frameshift variant was found in a Turkish family with AR nonsyndromic, progressive high-
frequency hearing loss [
83
]; this clinical description is similar to that of ID20. In Cldn9
-/-
mice, defective tight junctions in the cochlea are hypothesized to cause the increased
concentration K
+
in the perilymph and massive hair cell loss [
84
]. In this case the sinonasal
findings are probably not related to genetic susceptibility.
GREB1L: Previously variants in GREB1L (MIM 617782; 18q11.1-q11.2) were associated
with AD nonsyndromic hearing loss with or without cochleovestibular malformations and
non-ear phenotypes [
20
22
]. Our patient ID22 is heterozygous for a novel missense variant
GREB1L c.3798C>G (p.(Ser1266Arg)) but has no other features in addition to profound
hearing loss (Table 1, Table 2and Table S1). She also has a heterozygous variant in CBLN3
(MIM 612978; 14q12). Cbln3 is expressed in supporting cells and outer hair cells of the inner
ear (gEAR), and also in the cerebellum and dorsal cochlear nucleus [
85
]. Heterozygous
Cbln3-mutant mice have abnormal ABR (IMPC), implying that CBLN3 is also a candidate
gene for ID220s hearing loss.
GDPD5: Patient 27 has two missense variants each in two genes: GDPD5 (also GDE2,
MIM 609632; 11q13.4-q13.5) which encodes an enzyme involved in glycerol metabolism;
and MADD (MIM 603584; 11p11.2) (Table S1). Gdpd5 is expressed in hair cells and sup-
porting cells of mouse cochlea (gEAR) and homozygous knockout mice have abnormal
ABRs (IMPC). On the other hand, biallelic MADD variants cause a multisystemic neu-
rodevelopmental disorder that includes sensorineural hearing loss in 17% of patients [
86
].
Our patient ID27 has hearing loss and bilateral EVA with no note of additional neurologic
phenotypes (Table 1), suggesting that GDPD5 is a candidate gene for her hearing loss.
4. Discussion
In this study, we identified novel variants in 14 genes: twelve are novel variants in
eleven known hearing loss or neurodevelopmental genes DSPP, LMX1A, DMXL2, PTPRQ,
PCDH15, COL11A1, TECTA, SLC12A2, MYO18B, CLDN9 and GREB1L; while four variants
are in candidate genes for hearing loss IST1, CBLN3 and GDPD5 (Table 2). In addition,
several inner ear and temporal bone malformations were identified in variant carriers,
namely: (1) EVA in carriers of DSPP, IST1, FLNA and GDPD5 variants; (2) semicircular canal
dehiscence in carriers of DMXL2, PTPRQ and COL11A1/TECTA variants; and (3) malformed
cochleae in carriers of variants in LMX1A and MYO18B (Table 1; Figure 1). These findings
suggest that at least some of these variants (e.g., variants in DSPP, LMX1A and MYO18B)
are also potentially causal of temporal bone anomalies. Factors that may have contributed
to an increased rate of variant identification from the sequence data of our cohort of
30 pediatric cochlear implant recipients include: (a) a more inclusive approach for low-
frequency variants, particularly if the MAF was increased in an indigenous or isolated
population which has high rates of intermarriage and potentially undiagnosed hearing
loss (Table 2) [
43
,
87
,
88
]; and (b) genotype-phenotype correlation that takes into account
additional clinical manifestations (e.g., developmental delay, recurrent infections) which
overlap with features of syndromes or multi-systemic neurodevelopmental disorders. In
the latter case, hearing loss might not be among the major criteria of the disorder, but
the overall clinical presentation of the specific patient may fit previous descriptions of
genotype-phenotype correlations that include hearing loss or bony defects.
Genes 2021,12, 566 12 of 16
Apparent contradictions in modes of inheritance may be due to undetected second
variants for autosomal recessive disorders, which is a limitation of our study due to the
lack of data on CNVs, cryptic splice sites, and non-coding regions [
89
]. Unfortunately, we
only have DNA samples from patients and not from parents or additional relatives, so we
cannot determine the identified variants’ pattern of inheritance or if they potentially arose
de novo.
It is not unusual for the same gene to cause both autosomal dominant and autosomal
recessive forms of hearing loss, e.g., MYO7A (MIM 276903) variants have been associated
with either autosomal dominant (MIM 601317) or autosomal recessive non-syndromic
hearing loss (MIM 600060), as well as autosomal recessive Usher syndrome type 1B (MIM
276900). Differences in modes of inheritance may be associated with phenotypic variability,
such that variants known to cause autosomal recessive hearing loss that is characterized by
prelingual profound hearing loss co-exist with heterozygous variants that cause autosomal
dominant forms with milder hearing loss of later onset. Additionally, with the increasing
number of identified genes for hearing loss, the occurrence of multiple variants within
different genes that independently predispose to hearing loss in the same individual may
be more common than previously thought [
90
]. Multiple variants in different genes may
also contribute to variability in phenotypes (e.g., two genes with variants in the same
individual causing different phenotypes rather than the same syndrome). An example
would be ID24 in our cohort, in which a known pathogenic G6PD variant likely explains
the patient’s neonatal jaundice, while the hearing loss is potentially due to a known variant
in FLNA. Continued efforts in identifying novel genes mean that patient sequence data
must be periodically reanalyzed not only to resolve a potential genetic etiology, but also
to identify compound phenotypes due to variants in multiple genes. If multiple genes or
variants are involved, additional studies on the functional effects per variant will aid in the
determination of which variant is more strongly contributing to the hearing loss phenotype.
5. Conclusions
We identified novel variants in 11 known genes for hearing loss and neurodevelop-
mental phenotypes. We also present three genes IST1,CBLN3 and GDPD5 as potential
candidate genes for hearing loss, all three of which have mouse models with abnormal ABR
findings that are matched to the patient’s genotype. Our findings highlight the importance
of identifying novel variants and genes in well-characterized patients from ethnic groups
that are understudied for hearing loss.
Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10
.3390/genes12040566/s1, Table S1: Rare damaging variants identified in 15 Filipino children with
hearing loss requiring cochlear implants.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, R.L.P.S.-C. and C.M.C.; Funding Acquisition, R.L.P.S.-C.
and C.M.C.; Data Curation, R.L.P.S.-C., T.K.L.Y., C.A.M.T.-G. and C.M.C.; Formal Analysis, R.L.P.S.-C.;
Investigation, R.L.P.S.-C., T.K.L.Y., T.C.B., M.L.C.T., M.E.C.P., C.A.M.T.-G., M.R.T.R.-Q., E.M.C.-d.l.P.
and C.M.C.; Project Administration, R.L.P.S.-C., T.K.L.Y., C.A.M.T.-G., M.R.T.R.-Q., E.M.C.-d.l.P. and
C.M.C.; Resources, R.L.P.S.-C., K.L.M., N.R.L., C.A.M.T.-G., E.M.C.-d.l.P. and C.M.C.; Supervision,
R.L.P.S.-C. and C.M.C.; Validation, T.C.B.; Visualization, R.L.P.S.-C., T.C.B. and C.M.C.; Writing—
Original Draft Preparation, R.L.P.S.-C., T.K.L.Y. and C.M.C.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.L.P.S.-C.,
T.K.L.Y., T.C.B., M.L.C.T., K.L.M., T.L.G.C., M.E.C.P., A.L.C., N.R.L., C.A.M.T.-G., M.R.T.R.-Q., E.M.C.-
d.l.P., C.M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This work was funded by grants PCHRD-DOST FP150010 and UP Manila-NIH 2008–005
(to C.M.C.).
Institutional Review Board Statement:
The study was approved by the UP Manila Research Ethics
Board (approval no. 2013-401-01). All parents of children who were included in the study provided
informed consent.
Informed Consent Statement:
All parents of children who were included in the study provided
informed consent.
Genes 2021,12, 566 13 of 16
Acknowledgments:
We thank the patients and their parents for their participation in this study. We
also thank C. Garcia and M. Pedro for administrative support.
Conflicts of Interest:
C.T. is an employee of MED-EL, but MED-EL had no role in the study design,
data analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and
years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the
Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018,392, 1789–1858. [CrossRef]
2.
Dai, P.; Huang, L.H.; Wang, G.J.; Gao, X.; Qu, C.Y.; Chen, X.W.; Ma, F.R.; Zhang, J.; Xing, W.L.; Xi, S.Y.; et al. Concurrent hearing
and genetic screening of 180,469 neonates with follow-up in Beijing, China. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019,105, 803–812. [CrossRef]
3.
Omichi, R.; Shibata, S.B.; Morton, C.C.; Smith, R.J.H. Gene therapy for hearing loss. Hum. Mol. Genet.
2019
,29, R65–R79.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
Azaiez, H.; Booth, K.T.; Ephraim, S.S.; Crone, B.; Black-Ziegelbein, E.A.; Marini, R.J.; Shearer, A.E.; Sloan-Heggen, C.M.; Kolbe, D.;
Casavant, T.; et al. Genomic landscape and mutational signatures of deafness-associated genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet.
2018
,103,
484–497. [CrossRef]
5.
Girotto, G.; Morgan, A.; Krishnamoorthy, N.; Cocca, M.; Brumat, M.; Bassani, S.; La Bianca, M.; Di Stazio, M.; Gasparini, P. Next
generation sequencing and animal models reveal SLC9A3R1 as a new gene involved in human age-related hearing loss. Front.
Genet. 2020,10, 142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.
Deng, L.; Liu, Y.; Xia, W.; Hu, J.; Ma, Z. Identification of ANLN as a new likely pathogenic gene of branchio-otic syndrome in a
three-generation Chinese family. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2019,7, e00525. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Bademci, G.; Abad, C.; Incesulu, A.; Elian, F.; Reyahi, A.; Diaz-Horta, O.; Cengiz, F.B.; Sineni, C.J.; Seyhan, S.; Atli, E.I.; et al.
FOXF2 is required for cochlear development in humans and mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019,28, 1286–1297. [CrossRef]
8.
Xia, W.; Hu, J.; Ma, J.; Huang, J.; Jing, T.; Deng, L.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, N.; Ma, D.; Ma, Z. Mutations in TOP2B cause autosomal-
dominant hereditary hearing loss via inhibition of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway. FEBS Lett.
2019
,593, 2008–2018. [CrossRef]
9.
Peter, V.G.; Quinodoz, M.; Pinto-Basto, J.; Sousa, S.B.; Di Gioia, S.A.; Soares, G.; Ferraz Leal, G.; Silva, E.D.; Pescini Gobert, R.;
Miyake, N.; et al. The Liberfarb syndrome, a multisystemic disorder affecting eye, ear, bone, and brain development, is caused by
a founder pathogenic variant in the PISD gene. Genet. Med. 2019,21, 2734–2743. [CrossRef]
10.
Schrauwen, I.; Melegh, B.I.; Chakchouk, I.; Acharya, A.; Nasir, A.; Poston, A.; Cornejo-Sanchez, D.M.; Szabo, Z.;
Karosi, T.
;
Bene, J.; et al.
Hearing impairment locus heterogeneity and identification of PLS1 as a new autosomal dominant gene in Hungarian
Roma. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2019,27, 869–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.
Morgan, A.; Koboldt, D.C.; Barrie, E.S.; Crist, E.R.; Garcia, G.G.; Mezzavilla, M.; Faletra, F.; Mosher, T.M.; Wilson, R.K.;
Blanchet, C.; et al.
Mutations in PLS1, encoding fimbrin, cause autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. Hum. Mutat.
2019,40, 2286–2295. [CrossRef]
12.
Dunbar, L.A.; Patni, P.; Aguilar, C.; Mburu, P.; Corns, L.; Wells, H.R.; Delmaghani, S.; Parker, A.; Johnson, S.; Williams, D.; et al.
Clarin-2 is essential for hearing by maintaining stereocilia integrity and function. EMBO Mol. Med. 2019,11, e10288. [CrossRef]
13.
Boyden, L.M.; Atzmony, L.; Hamilton, C.; Zhou, J.; Lim, Y.H.; Hu, R.; Pappas, J.; Rabin, R.; Ekstien, J.; Hirsch, Y.; et al. Recessive
mutations in AP1B1 cause ichthyosis, deafness, and photophobia. Am. J. Hum. Genet.
2019
,105, 1023–1029. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.
Lu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Dong, C.; Qi, Y.; Liu, Y. Whole exome sequencing identifies SCD5 as a novel
causative gene for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic deafness. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2020,63, 103855. [CrossRef]
15.
Tucker, E.J.; Rius, R.; Jaillard, S.; Bell, K.; Lamont, P.J.; Travessa, A.; Dupont, J.; Sampaio, L.; Dulon, J.; Vuillaumier-Barrot, S.; et al.
Genomic sequencing highlights the diverse molecular causes of Perrault syndrome: A peroxisomal disorder (PEX6), metabolic
disorders (CLPP,GGPS1), and mtDNA maintenance/translation disorders (LARS2,TFAM). Hum. Genet.
2020
,139, 1325–1343.
[CrossRef]
16.
Reghan Foley, A.; Zou, Y.; Dunford, J.E.; Rooney, J.; Chandra, G.; Xiong, H.; Straub, V.; Voit, T.; Romero, N.;
Donkervoort, S.; et al.
GGPS1 mutations cause muscular dystrophy/hearing loss/ovarian insufficiency syndrome. Ann. Neurol.
2020
,88, 332–347.
[CrossRef]
17.
Mutai, H.; Wasano, K.; Momozawa, Y.; Kamatani, Y.; Miya, F.; Masuda, S.; Morimoto, N.; Nara, K.; Takahashi, S.;
Tsunoda, T.; et al.
Variants encoding a restricted carboxy-terminal domain of SLC12A2 cause hereditary hearing loss in humans. PLoS Genet
2020
,
16, e1008643. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.
McNeill, A.; Iovino, E.; Mansard, L.; Vache, C.; Baux, D.; Bedoukian, E.; Cox, H.; Dean, J.; Goudie, D.;
Kumar, A.; et al.
SLC12A2
variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder or cochleovestibular defect. Brain 2020,143, 2380–2387. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.
Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, R.; Sun, F.; Cheng, C.; Qian, F.; Duan, X.; Wei, G.; Sun, C.; Pang, X.; et al. THOC1 deficiency leads
to late-onset nonsyndromic hearing loss through p53-mediated hair cell apoptosis. PLoS Genet.
2020
,16, e1008953. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
20.
Schrauwen, I.; Kari, E.; Mattox, J.; Llaci, L.; Smeeton, J.; Naymik, M.; Raible, D.W.; Knowles, J.A.; Gage Crump, J.;
Huentelman, M.J.; et al.
De novo variants in GREB1L are associated with inner ear malformations and deafness. Hum. Genet.
2018,137, 459–470. [CrossRef]
Genes 2021,12, 566 14 of 16
21.
Kari, E.; Llaci, L.; Go, J.L.; Naymik, M.; Knowles, J.A.; Leal, S.M.; Rangasamy, S.; Huentelman, M.J.; Liang, W.;
Friedman, R.A.; et al.
Genes implicated in rare congenital inner ear and cochleovestibular nerve malformations. Ear Hear.
2020
,
41, 983–989. [CrossRef]
22.
Schrauwen, I.; Liaqat, K.; Schatteman, I.; Bharadwaj, T.; Nasir, A.; Acharya, A.; Ahmad, W.; Van Camp, G.; Leal, S.M. Autosomal
dominantly inherited GREB1L variants in individuals with profound sensorineural hearing impairment. Genes
2020
,11, 687.
[CrossRef]
23.
Campbell, C.; Cucci, R.A.; Prasad, S.; Green, G.E.; Edeal, J.B.; Galer, C.E.; Karniski, L.P.; Sheffield, V.C.; Smith, R.J. Pendred
syndrome, DFNB4, and PDS/SLC26A4 identification of eight novel mutations and possible genotype-phenotype correlations.
Hum. Mutat. 2001,17, 403–411. [CrossRef]
24.
Noonan, K.Y.; Russo, J.; Shen, J.; Rehm, H.; Halbach, S.; Hopp, E.; Noon, S.; Hoover, J.; Eskey, C.; Saunders, J.E. CDH23 related
hearing loss: A new genetic risk factor for semicircular canal dehiscence? Otol. Neurotol.
2016
,37, 1583–1588. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Kenna, M.A.; Rehm, H.L.; Frangulov, A.; Feldman, H.A.; Robson, C.D. Temporal bone abnormalities in children with GJB2
mutations. Laryngoscope 2011,121, 630–635. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26.
De Kok, Y.J.; van der Maarel, S.M.; Bitner-Glindzicz, M.; Huber, I.; Monaco, A.P.; Malcolm, S.; Pembrey, M.E.; Ropers, H.H.;
Cremers, F.P. Association between X-linked mixed deafness and mutations in the POU domain gene POU3F4.Science
1995
,267,
685–688. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27.
Elmaleh-Berges, M.; Baumann, C.; Noel-Petroff, N.; Sekkal, A.; Couloigner, V.; Devriendt, K.; Wilson, M.; Marlin, S.; Sebag, G.;
Pingault, V. Spectrum of temporal bone abnormalities in patients with Waardenburg syndrome and SOX10 mutations. AJNR Am.
J. Neuroradiol. 2013,34, 1257–1263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28.
Kari, E.; Llaci, L.; Go, J.L.; Naymik, M.; Knowles, J.A.; Leal, S.M.; Rangasamy, S.; Huentelman, M.J.; Friedman, R.A.; Schrauwen, I.
A de novo SIX1 variant in a patient with a rare nonsyndromic cochleovestibular nerve abnormality, cochlear hypoplasia, and
bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2019,7, e995. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Vesseur, A.C.; Verbist, B.M.; Westerlaan, H.E.; Kloostra, F.J.J.; Admiraal, R.J.C.; van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C.M.A.; Free, R.H.; Mylanus,
E.A.M. CT findings of the temporal bone in CHARGE syndrome: Aspects of importance in cochlear implant surgery. Eur. Arch.
Otorhinolaryngol. 2016,273, 4225–4240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30.
Papsin, B.C. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope
2005
,115, 1–26.
[CrossRef]
31.
Yoon, P.J.; Sumalde, A.A.M.; Ray, D.C.; Newton, S.; Cass, S.P.; Chan, K.H.; Santos-Cortez, R.L.P. Novel variants in hearing loss
genes and associations with audiometric thresholds in a multi-ethnic cohort of US patients with cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol.
2020,41, 978–985. [CrossRef]
32.
Chiong, C.M.; Cutiongco-de la Paz, E.M.; Reyes-Quintos, M.R.T.; Tobias, C.A.M.; Hernandez, K.; Santos-Cortez, R.L.P. GJB2
variants and auditory outcomes among Filipino cochlear implantees. Audiol. Neurotol. Extra 2013,3, 1–8. [CrossRef]
33.
Chiong, C.M.; Reyes-Quintos, M.R.T.; Yarza, T.K.L.; Tobias-Grasso, C.A.M.; Acharya, A.; Leal, S.M.; Mohlke, K.L.;
Mayol, N.L.
;
Cutiongco-de la Paz, E.M.; Santos-Cortez, R.L.P. The SLC26A4 c.706C>G (p.Leu236Val) variant is a frequent cause of nonsyndromic
hearing impairment in Filipino cochlear implantees. Otol. Neurotol. 2018,39, e726–e730. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Truong, B.T.; Yarza, T.K.L.; Bootpetch Roberts, T.; Roberts, S.; Xu, J.; Steritz, M.J.; Tobias-Grasso, C.A.M.; Azamian, M.;
Lalani, S.R.
;
Mohlke, K.L.; et al. Exome sequencing reveals novel variants and unique allelic spectrum for hearing impairment in Filipino
cochlear implantees. Clin. Genet. 2020,95, 634–636. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35.
Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics
2009
,25, 1754–1760.
[CrossRef]
36.
McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.;
Daly, M.; et al.
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.
Genome Res. 2010,20, 1297–1303. [CrossRef]
37.
Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010,38, e164. [CrossRef]
38.
Schwarz, J.M.; Rodelsperger, C.; Schuelke, M.; Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence
alterations. Nat. Methods 2010,7, 575–576. [CrossRef]
39.
Lek, M.; Karczewski, K.J.; Minikel, E.V.; Samocha, K.E.; Banks, E.; Fennell, T.; O’Donnell-Luria, A.H.; Ware, J.S.; Hill, A.J.;
Cummings, B.B.; et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature
2016
,536, 285–291. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
40.
Scott, E.M.; Halees, A.; Itan, Y.; Spencer, E.G.; He, Y.; Azab, M.A.; Gabriel, S.B.; Belkadi, A.; Boisson, B.; Abel, L.; et al.
Characterization of Greater Middle Eastern genetic variation for enhanced disease gene discovery. Nat. Genet.
2016
,48, 1071–1076.
[CrossRef]
41.
Kircher, M.; Witten, D.M.; Jain, P.; O’Roak, B.J.; Cooper, G.M.; Shendure, J. A general framework for estimating the relative
pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat. Genet. 2014,46, 310–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42.
Liu, X.; Jian, X.; Boerwinkle, E. dbNSFP: A lightweight database of human nonsynonymous SNPs and their functional predictions.
Hum. Mutat. 2011,32, 894–899. [CrossRef]
43.
GenomeAsia 100 K Consortium. The GenomeAsia 100 K Project enables genetic discoveries across Asia. Nature
2019
,576, 106–111.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 2021,12, 566 15 of 16
44.
Thorvaldsdottir, H.; Robinson, J.T.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualiza-
tion and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 2013,14, 178–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Xiao, S.; Yu, C.; Chou, X.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Y.; Bu, L.; Fu, G.; Qian, M.; Yang, J.; Shi, Y.; et al. Dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 with
or without progressive hearing loss is associated with distinct mutations in DSPP.Nat. Genet.
2001
,27, 201–204. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
46.
Kim, J.W.; Nam, S.H.; Jang, K.T.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, C.C.; Hahn, S.H.; Hu, J.C.C.; Simmer, J.P. A novel splice acceptor mutation in the
DSPP gene causing dentinogenesis imperfecta type II. Hum. Genet. 2004,115, 248–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47.
Li, W.X.; Peng, H.; Yang, L.; Hao, Q.Q.; Sun, W.; Ji, F.; Guo, W.W.; Yang, S.M. Familial nonsyndromic hearing loss with incomplete
partition type II by novel DSPP gene mutations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018,138, 685–690. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Liu, W.H.; Chang, P.Y.; Chang, S.C.; Lu, J.J.; Wu, C.M. Mutation screening in non-syndromic hearing loss patients with cochlear
implantation by massive parallel sequencing in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2019,14, e0211261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49.
Bajoghli, B.; Ramialison, M.; Aghaallaei, N.; Czerny, T.; Wittbrodt, J. Identification of starmaker-like in medaka as a putative
target gene of Pax2 in the otic vesicle. Dev. Dyn. 2009,238, 2860–2866. [CrossRef]
50.
Prasad, M.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Kulkarni, A.; Boskey, A.; Feng, J.Q.; Qin, C. Expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein in
non-mineralized tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2011,59, 1009–1021. [CrossRef]
51.
Kruszka, P.; Hu, T.; Hong, S.; Signer, R.; Cogne, B.; Isidor, B.; Mazzola, S.E.; Giltay, J.C.; van Gassen, K.L.I.; England, E.M.; et al.
Phenotype delineation of ZNF462 related syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2019,179, 2075–2082. [CrossRef]
52.
Helou, J.; Otto, E.A.; Attanasio, M.; Allen, S.J.; Parisi, M.A.; Glass, I.; Utsch, B.; Hashmi, S.; Fazzi, E.; Omran, H.; et al. Mutation
analysis of NPHP6/CEP290 in patients with Joubert syndrome and Senior-Loken syndrome. J. Med. Genet.
2007
,44, 657–663.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Wesdorp, M.; de Koning Gans, P.A.M.; Schraders, M.; Oostrik, J.; Huynen, M.A.; Venselaar, H.; Beynon, A.J.; van Gaalen, J.;
Piai, V.
; Voermans, N.; et al. Heterozygous missense variants of LMX1A lead to nonsyndromic hearing impairment and vestibular
dysfunction. Hum. Genet. 2018,137, 389–400. [CrossRef]
54.
Schrauwen, I.; Chakchouk, I.; Liaqat, K.; Jan, A.; Nasir, A.; Hussain, S.; Nickerson, D.A.; Bamshad, M.J.; Ullah, A.;
Ahmad, W.; et al.
A variant in LMX1A causes autosomal recessive severe-to-profound hearing impairment. Hum. Genet.
2018
,137, 471–478.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
55.
Barat-Houari, M.; Sarrabay, G.; Gatinois, V.; Fabre, A.; Dumont, B.; Genevieve, D.; Touitou, I. Mutation update for COL2A1 gene
variants associated with type II collagenopathies. Hum. Mutat. 2016,37, 7–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56.
Steffes, G.; Lorente-Canovas, B.; Pearson, S.; Brooker, R.H.; Spiden, S.; Kiernan, A.E.; Guenet, J.L.; Steel, K.P. Mutanlallemand
(mtl) and belly spot and deafness (bsd) are two new mutations of Lmx1a causing severe cochlear and vestibular defects. PLoS
ONE 2012,7, e051065. [CrossRef]
57.
Nichols, D.H.; Pauley, S.; Jahan, I.; Beisel, K.W.; Millen, K.J.; Fritzsch, B. Lmx1a is required for segregation of sensory epithelia
and normal ear histogenesis and morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2008,334, 339–358. [CrossRef]
58.
Maddox, B.K.; Garofalo, S.; Horton, W.A.; Richardson, M.D.; Trune, D.R. Craniofacial and otic capsule abnormalities in a
transgenic mouse strain with a Col2a1 mutation. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol. 1998,18, 195–201.
59.
Happ, H.; Schilter, K.F.; Weh, E.; Reis, L.M.; Semina, E.V. 8q21.11 microdeletion in two patients with syndromic peters anomaly.
Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2016,170, 2471–2475. [CrossRef]
60.
Palomares, M.; Delicado, A.; Mansilla, E.; de Torres, M.L.; Vallespin, E.; Fernandez, L.; Martinez-Glex, V.; Garcia-Minaur, S.;
Nevado, J.; Santos Simarro, F.; et al. Characterization of a 8q21.11 microdeletion syndrome associated with intellectual disability
and a recognizable phenotype. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011,89, 295–301. [CrossRef]
61.
Salehi, P.; Ge, M.X.; Gundimeda, U.; Baum, L.M.; Cantu, H.L.; Lavinsky, J.; Tao, L.; Myint, A.; Cruz, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Role
of neuropilin-1/semaphoring-3A signaling in the functional and morphological integrity of the cochlea. PLoS Genet.
2017
,13,
e1007048. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62.
Liu, F.; Guo, H.; Ou, M.; Hou, X.; Sun, G.; Gong, W.; Jing, H.; Tan, Q.; Xue, W.; Dai, Y.; et al. ARHGAP4 mutated in a Chinese
intellectually challenged family. Gene 2016,578, 205–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63.
Huang, L.; Poke, G.; Gecz, J.; Gibson, K. A novel contiguous gene deletion of AVPR2 and ARHGAP4 genes in male dizygotic
twins with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and intellectual disability. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2012,158, 2511–2518. [CrossRef]
64.
Chen, D.Y.; Liu, X.F.; Lin, X.J.; Zhang, D.; Chai, Y.C.; Yu, D.H.; Sun, C.L.; Wang, X.L.; Zhu, W.D.; Chen, Y.; et al. A dominant
variant in DMXL2 is linked to nonsyndromic hearing loss. Genet. Med. 2017,19, 553–558. [CrossRef]
65.
Wonkam-Tingang, E.; Schrauwen, I.; Esoh, K.K.; Bharadwaj, T.; Nouel-Saied, L.M.; Acharya, A.; Nasir, A.; Leal, S.M.;
Wonkam, A.
A novel variant in DMXL2 gene is associated with autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing impairment (DFNA71) in a
Cameroonian family. Exp. Biol. Med. 2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66.
Esposito, A.; Falace, A.; Wagner, M.; Gal, M.; Mei, D.; Conti, V.; Pisano, T.; Aprile, D.; Cerullo, M.S.; De Fusco, A.; et al.
Biallelic DMXL2 mutations impair autophagy and cause Ohtahara syndrome with progressive course. Brain
2019
,142, 3876–3891.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
67.
Sakuma, N.; Moteki, H.; Azaiez, H.; Booth, K.T.; Takahashi, M.; Arai, Y.; Shearer, A.E.; Sloan, C.M.; Nishio, S.Y.; Kolbe, D.L.; et al.
Novel PTPRQ mutations identified in three congenital hearing loss patients with various types of hearing loss. Ann. Otol. Rhinol.
Laryngol. 2015,124, 184S–192S. [CrossRef]
Genes 2021,12, 566 16 of 16
68.
Eisenberger, T.; Di Donato, N.; Decker, C.; Vedove, A.D.; Neuhaus, C.; Nurnberg, G.; Toliat, M.; Nurnberg, P.; Murbe, D.; Bolz, H.J.
A C-terminal nonsense mutation links PTPRQ with autosomal-dominant hearing loss, DFNA73. Genet. Med.
2018
,20, 614–621.
[CrossRef]
69.
Wu, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, S.; Wen, Y.Y.; Liu, B.; Xie, W.; Li, D.; Liu, L.; Huang, X.; Sun, Y.; et al. Autosomal recessive congenital
sensorineural hearing loss due to a novel compound heterozygous PTPRQ mutation in a Chinese family. Neural. Plast.
2018
,2018,
9425725. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
70.
Van Vierzen, P.B.; Joosten, F.B.; Marres, H.A.; Cremers, C.W.; Ruijs, J.H. Mandibulofacial dysostosis: CT findings of the temporal
bones. Eur. J. Radiol. 1995,21, 53–57. [CrossRef]
71.
Guan, Y.; Yang, H.; Yao, X.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Tang, X.; Hao, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, S.; Ge, W.; et al. Clinical and genetic spectrum of
children with primary ciliary dyskinesia in China. Chest 2021. [CrossRef]
72.
Blue, E.; Louie, T.L.; Chong, J.X.; Hebbring, S.J.; Barnes, K.C.; Rafaels, N.M.; Knowles, M.R.; Gibson, R.L.; Bamshad, M.J.; Emond,
M.J.; et al. Variation in cilia protein genes and progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.
2018
,15,
440–448. [CrossRef]
73. Zheng, Q.Y.; Yan, D.; Ouyang, X.M.; Du, L.L.; Yu, H.; Chang, B.; Johnson, K.R.; Liu, X.Z. Digenic inheritance of deafness caused
by mutations in genes encoding cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 in mice and humans. Hum. Mol. Genet.
2005
,14, 103–111.
[CrossRef]
74.
Szymko-Bennett, Y.M.; Mastroianni, M.A.; Shotland, L.I.; Davis, J.; Ondrey, F.G.; Balog, J.Z.; Rudy, S.F.; McCullagh, L.; Levy,
H.P.; Liberfarb, R.M.; et al. Auditory dysfunction in Stickler syndrome. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
2001
,127, 1061–1068.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
75.
Bahmad, F.; O’Malley, J.; Tranebjaerg, L.; Merchant, S.N. Histopathology of nonsyndromic autosomal dominant midfrequency
sensorineural hearing loss. Otol. Neurotol. 2008,29, 601–606. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76.
Rodger, C.; Flex, E.; Allison, R.J.; Sanchis-Juan, A.; Hasenahuer, M.A.; Cecchetti, S.; French, C.E.; Edgar, J.R.; Carpentieri, G.;
Ciolfi, A.; et al. De novo VPS4A mutations cause multisystem disease with abnormal neurodevelopment. Am. J. Hum. Genet.
2020,107, 1129–1148. [CrossRef]
77.
Delpire, E.; Lu, J.; England, R.; Dull, C.; Thorne, T. Deafness and imbalance associated with inactivation of the secretory Na-K-2Cl
co-transporter. Nat. Genet. 1999,22, 192–195. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
78.
Diaz, R.C.; Vazquez, A.E.; Dou, H.; Wei, D.; Cardell, E.L.; Lingrel, J.; Shull, G.E.; Doyle, K.J.; Yamoah, E.N. Conservation of
hearing by simultaneous mutation of Na,K-ATPase and NKCC1. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
2007
,8, 422–434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79.
Kenna, M.A.; Irace, A.L.; Strychowsky, J.E.; Kawai, K.; Barrett, D.; Manganella, J.; Cunningham, M.J. Otolaryngologic manifesta-
tions of Klippel-Feil syndrome in children. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2018,144, 238–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
80.
Yildirim, N.; Arslanoglu, A.; Mahirogullari, M.; Sahan, M.; Ozkan, H. Klippel-Feil syndrome and associated ear anomalies. Am. J.
Otolaryngol. 2008,29, 319–325. [CrossRef]
81.
Belfield, J.C.; Witana, J.S.; Connolly, D.J.A. Melnick-Needles syndrome: Report of a case associated with bilateral hypoplasia of
the cochlea. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007,28, 1160–1161. [CrossRef]
82. Swols, D.M.; Foster, J., 2nd; Tekin, M. KBG syndrome. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2017,12, 183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
83.
Sineni, C.J.; Yildirim-Baylan, M.; Guo, S.; Camarena, V.; Wang, G.; Tokgoz-Yilmaz, S.; Duman, D.; Bademci, G.; Tekin, M. A
truncating CLDN9 variant is associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Hum. Genet.
2019
,138, 1071–1075.
[CrossRef]
84.
Nakano, Y.; Kim, S.H.; Sanneman, J.D.; Zhang, Y.; Smith, R.J.H.; Marcus, D.C.; Wangemann, P.; Nessler, R.A.; Banfi, B. A
claudin-9-based ion permeability barrier is essential for hearing. PLoS Genet. 2009,5, e1000610. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
85.
Pang, Z.; Zuo, J.; Morgan, J.I. Cbln3, a novel member of the precerebellin family that binds specifically to Cbln1. J. Neurosci.
2000
,
20, 6333–6339. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86.
Schneeberger, P.E.; Kortum, F.; Korenke, G.C.; Alawi, M.; Santer, R.; Woidy, M.; Buhas, D.; Fox, S.; Juusola, J.; Alfadhel, M.; et al.
Biallelic MADD variants cause a phenotypic spectrum ranging from developmental delay to a multisystem disorder. Brain
2020
,
143, 2437–2453. [CrossRef]
87.
Winata, S.; Arhya, I.N.; Moeljopawiro, S.; Hinnant, J.T.; Liang, Y.; Friedman, T.B.; Asher, J.H., Jr. Congenital non-syndromal
autosomal recessive deafness in Bengkala, an isolated Balinese village. J. Med. Genet. 1995,32, 336–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88.
Santos-Cortez, R.L.P.; Reyes-Quintos, M.R.T.; Tantoco, M.L.C.; Abbe, I.; Llanes, E.G.D.V.; Ajami, N.J.; Hutchinson, D.S.; Petrosino,
J.F.; Padilla, C.D.; Villarta, R.L., Jr.; et al. Genetic and environmental determinants of otitis media in an indigenous Filipino
population. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016,155, 856–862. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
89.
Sanchez-Navarro, I.; da Silva, L.R.J.; Blanco-Kelly, F.; Zurita, O.; Sanchez-Bolivar, N.; Villaverde, C.; Lopez-Molina, M.I.; Garcia-
Sandoval, B.; Tahsin-Swafiri, S.; Minguez, P.; et al. Combining targeted panel-based resequencing and copy-number variation
analysis for the diagnosis of inherited syndromic retinopathies and associated ciliopathies. Sci. Rep. 2018,8, 5285. [CrossRef]
90.
Rehman, A.U.; Santos-Cortez, R.L.P.; Drummond, M.C.; Shahzad, M.; Lee, K.; Morell, R.J.; Ansar, M.; Jan, A.; Wang, X.; Aziz, A.;
et al. Challenges and solutions for gene identification in the presence of familial locus heterogeneity. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.
2015
,23,
1207–1215. [CrossRef]
... CI patient DNA was previously used in investigations on damaging variants in hearing loss, otitis media, and temporal bone anomalies. [11][12][13][14][15] Control DNA samples were previously isolated from saliva of a cohort of Filipino-descent individuals who did not have hearing loss and were recruited for a study on speech delay. 16 17 Additionally, we investigated a region located in an enhancer-like region (EH38E1658502) between exons 1 and 2 of the SNHLassociated gene GJB2. ...
... Alternatively, there may be other genetic factors that could have explained this finding. It must be noted that the DNA samples from our CI patients were submitted for exome sequencing, [11][12][13][14][15] and in six out of fifteen patients, known variants in HL genes were not identified. Further exome analysis of these patients, however, revealed potential candidate genes for HL and temporal bone anomalies in three patients as well as novel variants in known HL genes in four patients (patients 10-15; Table 1). ...
... Further exome analysis of these patients, however, revealed potential candidate genes for HL and temporal bone anomalies in three patients as well as novel variants in known HL genes in four patients (patients 10-15; Table 1). 15 In the other 10 patients, rare damaging variants were identified in non-GJB2 HL genes (patients 1-9; Table 1). For this study, we hypothesized that differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) in non-coding sequences of GJB2 or other known HL-associated genes may be present in our SNHL patients. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective. Recent advances in epigenetic studies continue to reveal novel mechanisms of gene regulation and control, however little is known on the role of epigenetics in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in humans. We aimed to investigate the methylation patterns of two regions, one in RB1 and another in GJB2 in Filipino patients with SNHL compared to hearing control individuals.Methods. We investigated an RB1 promoter region that was previously identified as differentially methylated in children with SNHL and lead exposure. Additionally, we investigated a sequence in an enhancer-like region within GJB2 that contains four CpGs in close proximity. Bisulfite conversion was performed on salivary DNA samples from 15 children with SNHL and 45 unrelated ethnically-matched individuals. We then performed methylation-specific real-time PCR analysis (qMSP) using TaqMan® probes to determine percentage methylation of the two regions.Results. Using qMSP, both our cases and controls had zero methylation at the targeted GJB2 and RB1 regions. Conclusion. Our study showed no changes in methylation at the selected CpG regions in RB1 and GJB2 in the two comparison groups with or without SNHL. This may be due to a lack of environmental exposures to these target regions. Other epigenetic marks may be present around these regions as well as those of other HL-associated genes.
... PTPRQ, DIAPH1, AKNAD1, and MYO18B) and one REG of HOMER2 were detected in the BFC. Damage to these genes causes hearing loss (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). PCDH15 encodes a crucial cadherin of protocadherin-15 to connect stereocilia (41), which are small hair-like structures in the cochlea and are responsible for hearing. ...
Article
Habitat degradation and loss of genetic diversity are common threats faced by almost all of today’s wild cats. Big cats, such as tigers and lions, are of great concern and have received considerable conservation attention through policies and international actions. However, knowledge of and conservation actions for small wild cats are lagging considerably behind. The black-footed cat, Felis nigripes , one of the smallest felid species, is experiencing increasing threats with a rapid reduction in population size. However, there is a lack of genetic information to assist in developing effective conservation actions. A de novo assembly of a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome of the black-footed cat was made, and comparative genomics and population genomics analyses were carried out. These analyses revealed that the most significant genetic changes in the evolution of the black-footed cat are the rapid evolution of sensory and metabolic-related genes, reflecting genetic adaptations to its characteristic nocturnal hunting and a high metabolic rate. Genomes of the black-footed cat exhibit a high level of inbreeding, especially for signals of recent inbreeding events, which suggest that they may have experienced severe genetic isolation caused by habitat fragmentation. More importantly, inbreeding associated with two deleterious mutated genes may exacerbate the risk of amyloidosis, the dominant disease that causes mortality of about 70% of captive individuals. Our research provides comprehensive documentation of the evolutionary history of the black-footed cat and suggests that there is an urgent need to investigate genomic variations of small felids worldwide to support effective conservation actions.
... Moreover, research on hearing need more support given that our studies on genetics of hearing loss among Filipinos yielded very important data on novel genes, uniqueness of our genetic pool as well as mutations predisposing to increased prevalence of otitis media among our marginalized and indigenous population. [22][23][24][25][26] As a low-to middle-income country, these researches will need to be continued and may provide valuable lessons for similarly challenged countries in the works as we highlighted in 2017 during the United Nations World Hearing Assembly Advocacy Event on hearing health (Figure 9). ...
Article
Full-text available
This keynote lecture is a product of many years of hard work but today this is delivered in honor of Professor and Founding President of ORLIAC, Professor Emeritus Jan Veldman. Thank you for the opportunity to host ORLIAC in Manila way back in March 2018. For those who attended this, I gave a special lecture during the celebration of World Hearing Day on March 3, 2018, when ORLIAC was held in Manila and this gives an update on how we managed in the past four and a half years, with a COVID-19 pandemic in the past two and half years. The Philippines is an archipelago of more than 7,100 islands during high tide and up to 7,600 when it is low tide. It is situated in the Southeast Asian region. It is one of the countries with the highest population density, with a total population of 110 million spread over 300,000 square kilometers. The crude birthrate is at 19.9 per 1000 – in stark contrast with surrounding Southeast Asian nations now with a decreasing population such as Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia among others There have been three World Health Assembly (WHA) resolutions that emphasized the prevention of deafness and hearing loss. WHA 38.19 in 1985 then ten years later WHA 48.9 in 1995 and the last WHA 70.13 in 2017. These resolutions from the World Health Assembly emphasized that prevention of deafness and hearing loss should be incorporated in primary health care. As a result of the 2017 WHA 70.13 resolution, a World Hearing Report1was formulated and released last year in 2021 (Figure 1). The WHO Call to Action in 2000 recommended that Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) be implemented in all countries where rehabilitation services are established.2 In 1998, we did the first cochlear implantation in my country3 and established as well the graduate program of Masters in Clinical Audiology at the UP College of Medicine where I now work as Dean. This graduate program is one of only two in the country and is government-subsidized such that slots are limited and entry is quite competitive. It is jointly offered with the College of Allied Medical Professions.4 We consider this program to be a key element in producing the necessary healthcare workforce needed for the implementation of programs to defeat deafness in my country. The world hearing report published last year by the World Health Organization (WHO) highlighted the increasing number of people living with hearing loss and in need of services. There is of course the disproportionate burden of hearing loss in low-to middle-income countries like the Philippines.6Our publications from 2003, from a study looking at results of newborn hearing screening in the neonatal intensive unit in the hospital7,8 then to the community, thus providing the evidence for the eventual policy on UNHS that we proposed to the Department of Health (DOH) and to congress for legislation.We initially embarked on basic epidemiological studies using otoacoustic emissions testing in the hospital then in the community. We noted the age of referral at our hospital for children with hearing impairment to be at around 34 months.9 Our focus then was just providing otological clinical services so we decided to work for the establishment of the Philippine National Ear Institute (PNEI) – a research institute formed by Republic Act 9245 and part of the National Institutes of Health of the University of the Philippines – Manila.10 The PNEI laid down the researches needed for the stable foundation of a national health program focused on newborn hearing. From 2003 to 2008, we conducted several studies to establish the prevalence of bilateral permanent hearing loss in newborns both in the hospital and community settings as a prelude to the enactment of the law, and in order to defend having a program on newborn hearing, we conducted a cost-analysis of hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening.11 Notably in 2007, a population-based study showed the prevalence of bilateral profound Congenital Hearing Loss at 1.4 per 1000 births.12 This translates to more than 3,000 babies annually or 8 babies per day who may be profoundly deaf in my country.13 If there were proper intervention for a child with hearing impairment, the cost of treating hearing translates to a lifetime savings of about 80,000 dollars or about PhP 4.3M for the patient’s family. The government and the family would have spent about PhP 4.3 M to raise, educate, and support a deaf-mute child to adulthood. This was presented to the Senate of the Philippines and highlighted during the Inaugural Congress of the ASEAN Academy of Neuro-Oto-Audiology (AANOA). This was supported by Senator Loren Legarda, PNEI Director Dr. Generoso Abes, AANOA founding member Dr. Helmi Balfas, IFOS Regional Secretary Chong Sun Kim, PSOHNS President Gil Vicente, AANOA President Dato Lokman Saim, and Hearing International Secretary Dr. Norberto Martinez (Figure 2). Mandating NHS in the country also entailed involving stakeholders, including otolaryngologists from the different regions who committed to convince their local officials and local hospital administrators the need for instituting these newborn hearing screening programs. After we had the local data at hand, the PSOHNS created a task force on NHS and crafted a position statement on the need for UNHS. As then Vice President, we drafted the position paper that will be presented to Congress while at the same time seeking support from the Department of Health under DOH Secretary Francisco Duque who agreed that Philhealth should be able to support this program when enacted into law. A Technical Working Group was formed, gathering all stakeholders and service providers. Multiple meetings were held, groundwork for launch, and implementation of newborn hearing screening program were instituted with ten Collaboration for Newborn Hearing Screening Advocacy (CONHScA) annual symposia with otolaryngology, audiology, and other hearing screening advocates all over the country.14 (Figure 3). On August 12, 2009, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo signed RA 9709, an act that established universalnewborn hearing screening program for the prevention, early diagnosis, and intervention of hearing loss.15 On the modality to be used, reporting, accreditation and training, monitoring and evaluation, and most especially costing of the services and financing for sustainability were also done. We advocated for legislation on UNHS, and once ratified, developed a national program with the Department of Health as lead agency and continued with policy implementation as part of a national technical working group under the DOH. This led to the creation of national Newborn Hearing Screening Reference Center (NHSRC) that was inaugurated in 2013 at the National Institutes of Health with Professor Cor Cremers of Radboud University Nijmegen as special guest. We also started to increase the awareness on the importance of NHS even on national television (Figure 4). Aside from the cost-effectiveness study of hospital-based newborn hearing screening program, we also looked at the budget impact of a community-based UNHSP in the Philippines from both the public payer and the societal perspectives. This study of Rivera et al. published in 201716 showed that cost effectiveness is sensitive to treatment rate, prevalence, follow-up rate, number of rehabilitation sessions, and coverage of the program. It was not sensitive to cost per rehabilitation session, cost of diagnosis with OAE and ABR, education costs, refer rates, recurrent costs, cost of machines, and sensitivity rates. From the societal perspective, the UNHSP was found to be cost-saving for the full range of parameters tested for cost of screening, amplification, education, rehabilitation, and fixed program costs. Ensuring treatment of at least 31 percent and follow-up rate of 24% for a community-based newborn hearing would likely be important benchmarks. The technical arm of the lead agency for this program, the Department of Health, is the Newborn Hearing Screening Reference Center that gives assistance in defining and recommending NHS testing and follow-up protocols which include hearing screening methods, devices used, location, manner, and timing of newborn hearing screening testing. The current protocol uses the 2007 JCIH recommendation of 1-3-6 rule, with screening at 1 month, confirmation of hearing loss at 3 months, and appropriate intervention at 6 months of age.17 With respect to the preferred method of screening, the recent study by Neumann K et al. showed OAE as most prevalent in the country.18 Ten years ago in 2010, an initial web registry for reporting of the OAE results was formulated up to 2014 it was used in 9 centers which allowed gathering of preliminary data on the NHS program. From the data, there was a registry card that needed manual data encoding and in order to sustain operations, a 1 USD fee was levied per registration and was reimbursable thru Philhealth that paid around 4 USD per hearing screening test done. Personnel training, device, and facility certification standards were implemented for centers that chose to perform newborn hearing screening testing. Tiered categorization of centers was also done with screening centers as Category A, screening and diagnostic centers as category B, screening, diagnostic, and essential intervention with hearing aid amplification as category C, and the highest category D for centers with genetic testing and counselling, cochlear implantation surgery and speech rehabilitation services. Recent data showed there were 1072 category A, 18 category B and C, and 9 category D centers distributed all over the country (Figure 5). While some services were initially hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic, NHSRC defined safety protocols that needed to be followed. In an updated advisory, first released in April 2020, and is still in effect to date, NHSRC emphasizes that the centers should follow hospital/institution’s procedural protocol regarding disinfection and attire. Hearing tests in infants are non-invasive and non-aerosol producing procedures. The advisory also included recommendations in terms of timing, preparation, and testing procedures. One significant development that was accelerated during the pandemic was the online adaptation of the NHS personnel certifying course that was reported in recent publications by Rozul et al.19,20 To date, there have been about 3403 trained personnel in 1099 centers with significant increase noted in 2019 compared to previous years. This was not however reflected in the report of Neumann probably due to the time when data for this publication was collected prior to 2019. From the registry alone, the percent screened in the Philippines has been reported to be at least 7-13 percent of live births from the years 2019-2021. The report from Philhealth of 800 claims for NHS from 2018-2019 is still under verification. In 2020, based on manual submission, out of 1099 facilities, 26 percent submitted reports. In 2019, 95% already submitted reports so the pandemic impacted significantly on reporting of results by excel file and paper reports (Figures 6 and 7). The program is still beset with challenges like poor compliance with data submission, loss to follow-up, poor connectivity, sustainable funding of the program from both local and national government, lack of human resources, and a need of much awareness among stakeholders regarding the importance of newborn hearing screening. In a country where 60 percent die without seeing a doctor, there is much work to do. The cost of screening equipment is a major barrier so we conceptualized a biomedical device development project working with engineers in the university to create an AABR screening device which is now on phase two with a TLR 5 early phase rating scale and will now include recruitment of more subjects and refinements for improvements. Harnessing technology and making this more affordable remain as strategies for developing a sustainable hearing screening program and is the subject of HELE, which aims to increase the rates of newborn hearing screening with novel technologies and telehealth. “Hele” stands for lullaby a mother sings to a child. We thought this as very apt for emphasizing the importance of hearing from birth for optimal development. This received a substantial phase 1 grant in 2016 and a phase 2 was launched this year for the premarket development which now stand at technology readiness level 5. It has already spawned many products like the computer-based e-learning training modules, capacity building with provision of basic OAE equipment, and many research publications. It is hoped that a pre-production HELE device can already be produced soon with validated efficacy and reproducibility of all the AABR responses in a clinical setting. With the collaboration of University of California Berkeley and UC Davis, a formidable team has been created. The electronic national newborn hearing screening registry was launched during WORLD HEARING DAY in 2022 and the usability testing results have been published by Ricalde et al.21 In the recent manual of operations and procedures, success indicators were outlined. This is aligned with the WHO standards for monitoring and evaluation, and determining success of programs. Beyond NHS, what else have we learned? Our studies on the genetic causes of the more common causes of hearing impairment such as otitis media showed a unique mutation A2ML1 that affected protease inhibitors allowing better mucosal defense of the middle ear mucosa. Our findings showed microbiome shifts and when we looked at gingivitis, this was what we found. The genetic counseling we embarked on for this indigenous community taught us clinicians many lessons. Speaking to them in their native language was important and house to house invitations were more effective. What about genetic basis of congenital hearing loss? We have found that SLC26A4 mutations were more common than GJB2. There were novel mutations seen in our cohort suggesting the need for studies looking at genetic predisposition. We saw commonalities with Indonesia in terms of the prevalence of GJB2 mutations. From our studies on A2ML1 mutations predisposing to otitis media, we are monitoring this with ongoing study on Hispanic populations. Meanwhile, a seed fund for a national cochlear implant program was approved by Congress and 20 children underwent surgery (Figure 8), while two centers, one in Visayas (Corazon Locsin Montelibano Memorial Regional Hospital in Bacolod) and another in Mindanao (Southern Philippines Medical Center in Davao) were capacitated. Virtual multidisciplinary meetings to discuss the cases were held and provided a model for optimizing use of resources and outcomes. The initial data from the 20 implanted children are very encouraging. There are goals of expanding this program to more beneficiaries by having a Z package for Cochlear implantation, funding from DOH medical assistance fund for indigent patients, and development of services for other implantable hearing devices at the Philippine General Hospital. Moreover, research on hearing need more support given that our studies on genetics of hearing loss among Filipinos yielded very important data on novel genes, uniqueness of our genetic pool as well as mutations predisposing to increased prevalence of otitis media among our marginalized and indigenous population.22-26 As a low- to middle-income country, these researches will need to be continued and may provide valuable lessons for similarly challenged countries in the works as we highlighted in 2017 during the United Nations World Hearing Assembly Advocacy Event on hearing health (Figure 9). The recent National Academy of Science and Technology health policy forum where Professor Xing Kuan Bu was featured as keynote lecturer gave important data on experiences on hearing health program development in China and in the world (Figure 10). Clearly the sustainable development goals especially 3,4,8 and 10 covered by hearing health ensures equity and should be aspirational goals for national development. This is congruent with the vision of PNEI: “No Filipino shall be deprived of a functioning sense of hearing and balance.” Lastly, as the theme of this congress is East Meets West, the Philippines had a strong history of shipbuilding in an era when the galleon trade was very active and 148 of 200 ships that plied that route were ships built in the Philippines with our hardwood. Tracing therefore the history of the countries in ASEAN in particular with the Dutch, French, British, and Spanish influences, we need to dig deeper and look at genetic markers for both health and disease so that while we develop our friendship and scientific connections, history will prove that we have always been connected in so many ways and further exploration can be done in many dimensions. Charlotte M. Chiong, MD, PhDResearch Professor 12Project Leader of HeLeDean, UP College of Medicine (2018-present) _____________________________Paper presented in the Otology Rhinology Laryngology International Academic Conference, September 26, 2022, Auditorium Antonianum, Rome, Italy. Paper prepared in fulfillment of the Alfredo T. Ramirez Professorial Chair for 2022.
... Next-generation sequencing technologies are revealing an increasing number of rare genes associated with EVA in patients negative for SLC26A4 mutations; these genes are expected to be heterogeneous, especially in cases on unilateral EVA, and probably strongly correlated to the ethnicity of the cohort [151]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hearing loss is the most common sensorial deficit in humans and one of the most common birth defects. In developed countries, at least 60% of cases of hearing loss are of genetic origin and may arise from pathogenic sequence alterations in one of more than 300 genes known to be involved in the hearing function. Hearing loss of genetic origin is frequently associated with inner ear malformations; of these, the most commonly detected is the enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). EVA may be associated to other cochleovestibular malformations, such as cochlear incomplete partitions, and can be found in syndromic as well as non-syndromic forms of hearing loss. Genes that have been linked to non-syndromic EVA are SLC26A4, GJB2, FOXI1, KCNJ10, and POU3F4. SLC26A4 and FOXI1 are also involved in determining syndromic forms of hearing loss with EVA, which are Pendred syndrome and distal renal tubular acidosis with deafness, respectively. In Caucasian cohorts, approximately 50% of cases of non-syndromic EVA are linked to SLC26A4 and a large fraction of patients remain undiagnosed, thus providing a strong imperative to further explore the etiology of this condition.
Article
Full-text available
Advanced genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics techniques are providing unprecedented insights into the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of the central nervous system, including the neuro-sensory cochlea of the inner ear. Here, we report for the first time a comprehensive and updated overview of the most advanced omics techniques for the study of nucleic acids and their applications in cochlear research. We describe the available in vitro and in vivo models for hearing research and the principles of genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, alongside their most advanced technologies (like single-cell omics and spatial omics), which allow for the investigation of the molecular events that occur at a single-cell resolution while retaining the spatial information.
Article
Full-text available
The solute carrier family 12 (SLC12) of cation-chloride cotransporters (CCCs) comprises potassium chloride cotransporters (KCCs, e.g. KCC1, KCC2, KCC3, and KCC4)-mediated Cl⁻ extrusion, and sodium potassium chloride cotransporters (N[K]CCs, NKCC1, NKCC2, and NCC)-mediated Cl⁻ loading. The CCCs play vital roles in cell volume regulation and ion homeostasis. Gain-of-function or loss-of-function of these ion transporters can cause diseases in many tissues. In recent years, there have been considerable advances in our understanding of CCCs' control mechanisms in cell volume regulations, with many techniques developed in studying the functions and activities of CCCs. Classic approaches to directly measure CCC activity involve assays that measure the transport of potassium substitutes through the CCCs. These techniques include the ammonium pulse technique, radioactive or nonradioactive rubidium ion uptake-assay, and thallium ion-uptake assay. CCCs' activity can also be indirectly observed by measuring γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity with patch-clamp electrophysiology and intracellular chloride concentration with sensitive microelectrodes, radiotracer ³⁶Cl⁻, and fluorescent dyes. Other techniques include directly looking at kinase regulatory sites phosphorylation, flame photometry, ²²Na⁺ uptake assay, structural biology, molecular modeling, and high-throughput drug screening. This review summarizes the role of CCCs in genetic disorders and cell volume regulation, current methods applied in studying CCCs biology, and compounds developed that directly or indirectly target the CCCs for disease treatments.
Article
Hereditary deafness is clinically and genetically heterogeneous. We investigated deafness segregating as a recessive trait in two families. Audiological examinations revealed an asymmetric mild to profound hearing loss with childhood or adolescent onset. Exome sequencing of probands identified a homozygous c.475G>A;p.(Glu159Lys) variant of CLDN9 (NM_020982.4) in one family and a homozygous c.370_372dupATC;p.(Ile124dup) CLDN9 variant in an affected individual of a second family. Claudin 9 (CLDN9) is an integral membrane protein and constituent of epithelial bicellular tight junctions that form semi‐permeable, paracellular barriers between inner ear perilymphatic and endolymphatic compartments. Computational structural modeling predicts that substitution of a lysine for glutamic acid p.(Glu159Lys) alters one of two cis‐interactions between CLDN9 protomers. The p.(Ile124dup) variant is predicted to locally misfold CLDN9 and mCherry tagged p.(Ile124dup) CLDN9 is not targeted to the HeLa cell membrane. In situ hybridization shows that mouse Cldn9 expression increases from embryonic to postnatal development and persists in adult inner ears coinciding with prominent CLDN9 immunoreactivity in tight junctions of epithelia outlining the scala media. Together with the Cldn9 deaf mouse and a homozygous frameshift of CLDN9 previously associated with deafness, the two bi‐allelic variants of CLDN9 described here point to CLDN9 as a bona fide human deafness gene. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
The endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRTs) are essential for multiple membrane modeling and membrane-independent cellular processes. Here we describe six unrelated individuals with de novo missense variants affecting the ATPase domain of VPS4A, a critical enzyme regulating ESCRT function. Probands had structural brain abnormalities, severe neurodevelopmental delay, cataracts, growth impairment, and anemia. In cultured cells, overexpression of VPS4A mutants caused enlarged endosomal vacuoles resembling those induced by expression of known dominant-negative ATPase-defective forms of VPS4A. Proband-derived fibroblasts had enlarged endosomal structures with abnormal accumulation of the ESCRT protein IST1 on the limiting membrane. VPS4A function was also required for normal endosomal morphology and IST1 localization in iPSC-derived human neurons. Mutations affected other ESCRT-dependent cellular processes, including regulation of centrosome number, primary cilium morphology, nuclear membrane morphology, chromosome segregation, mitotic spindle formation, and cell cycle progression. We thus characterize a distinct multisystem disorder caused by mutations affecting VPS4A and demonstrate that its normal function is required for multiple human developmental and cellular processes.
Article
Full-text available
Apoptosis of cochlear hair cells is a key step towards age-related hearing loss. Although numerous genes have been implicated in the genetic causes of late-onset, progressive hearing loss, few show direct links to the proapoptotic process. By genome-wide linkage analysis and whole exome sequencing, we identified a heterozygous p.L183V variant in THOC1 as the probable cause of the late-onset, progressive, non-syndromic hearing loss in a large family with autosomal dominant inheritance. Thoc1, a member of the conserved multisubunit THO/TREX ribonucleoprotein complex, is highly expressed in mouse and zebrafish hair cells. The thoc1 knockout (thoc1 mutant) zebrafish generated by gRNA-Cas9 system lacks the C-startle response, indicative of the hearing dysfunction. Both Thoc1 mutant and knockdown zebrafish have greatly reduced hair cell numbers, while the latter can be rescued by embryonic microinjection of human wild-type THOC1 mRNA but to significantly lesser degree by the c.547C>G mutant mRNA. The Thoc1 deficiency resulted in marked apoptosis in zebrafish hair cells. Consistently, transcriptome sequencing of the mutants showed significantly increased gene expression in the p53-associated signaling pathway. Depletion of p53 or applying the p53 inhibitor Pifithrin-α significantly rescued the hair cell loss in the Thoc1 knockdown zebrafish. Our results suggested that THOC1 deficiency lead to late-onset, progressive hearing loss through p53-mediated hair cell apoptosis. This is to our knowledge the first human disease associated with THOC1 mutations and may shed light on the molecular mechanism underlying the age-related hearing loss.
Article
Full-text available
Congenital hearing impairment is a sensory disorder that is genetically highly heterogeneous. By performing exome sequencing in two families with congenital nonsyndromic profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), we identified autosomal dominantly inherited missense variants [p.(Asn283Ser); p.(Thr116Ile)] in GREB1L, a neural crest regulatory molecule. The p.(Thr116Ile) variant was also associated with bilateral cochlear aplasia and cochlear nerve aplasia upon temporal bone imaging, an ultra-rare phenotype previously seen in patients with de novo GREB1L variants. An important role of GREB1L in normal ear development has also been demonstrated by greb1l−/− zebrafish, which show an abnormal sensory epithelia innervation. Last, we performed a review of all disease-associated variation described in GREB1L, as it has also been implicated in renal, bladder and genital malformations. We show that the spectrum of features associated with GREB1L is broad, variable and with a high level of reduced penetrance, which is typically characteristic of neurocristopathies. So far, seven GREB1L variants (14%) have been associated with ear-related abnormalities. In conclusion, these results show that autosomal dominantly inherited variants in GREB1L cause profound SNHL. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the phenotypic spectrum associated with GREB1L variants and strengthen the evidence of the involvement of GREB1L in human hearing.
Article
Full-text available
Objective A hitherto undescribed phenotype of early onset muscular dystrophy associated with sensorineural hearing loss and primary ovarian insufficiency was initially identified in two siblings and in subsequent patients with a similar constellation of findings. The goal of this study was to understand the genetic and molecular etiology of this condition. Methods We applied whole exome sequencing (WES) superimposed on shared haplotype regions to identify the initial biallelic variants in GGPS1 followed by GGPS1 Sanger sequencing or WES in five additional families with the same phenotype. Molecular modeling, biochemical analysis, laser membrane injury assay and the generation of a Y259C knock‐in mouse were done. Results A total of 11 patients in six families carrying five different biallelic mutations in specific domains of GGPS1 were identified. GGPS1 encodes geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase in the mevalonate/isoprenoid pathway, which catalyzes the synthesis of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), the lipid precursor of geranylgeranylated proteins including small GTPases. All but one patient presented with congenital sensorineural hearing loss and proximal weakness, and all post‐pubertal females had primary ovarian insufficiency. Muscle histology was dystrophic with ultrastructural evidence of autophagic material and large mitochondria in the most severe cases. There was delayed membrane healing after laser injury in patient derived myogenic cells while a knock‐in mouse of one of the mutations (Y259C) resulted in prenatal lethality. Interpretation The identification of specific GGPS1 mutations defines the cause of a unique form of muscular dystrophy with hearing loss and ovarian insufficiency and points to a novel pathway for this clinical constellation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Perrault syndrome is a rare heterogeneous condition characterised by sensorineural hearing loss and premature ovarian insufficiency. Additional neuromuscular pathology is observed in some patients. There are six genes in which variants are known to cause Perrault syndrome; however, these explain only a minority of cases. We investigated the genetic cause of Perrault syndrome in seven affected individuals from five different families, successfully identifying the cause in four patients. This included previously reported and novel causative variants in known Perrault syndrome genes, CLPP and LARS2, involved in mitochondrial proteolysis and mitochondrial translation, respectively. For the first time, we show that pathogenic variants in PEX6 can present clinically as Perrault syndrome. PEX6 encodes a peroxisomal biogenesis factor, and we demonstrate evidence of peroxisomal dysfunction in patient serum. This study consolidates the clinical overlap between Perrault syndrome and peroxisomal disorders, and highlights the need to consider ovarian function in individuals with atypical/mild peroxisomal disorders. The remaining patients had variants in candidate genes such as TFAM, involved in mtDNA transcription, replication, and packaging, and GGPS1 involved in mevalonate/coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis and whose enzymatic product is required for mouse folliculogenesis. This genomic study highlights the diverse molecular landscape of this poorly understood syndrome.
Article
Full-text available
The SLC12 gene family consists of SLC12A1 - SLC12A9, encoding electroneutral cation-coupled chloride cotransporters. SCL12A2 has been shown to play a role in corticogenesis and therefore represents a strong candidate neurodevelopmental disorder gene. Through trio exome sequencing we identified de novo mutations in SLC12A2 in 6 children with neurodevelopmental disorders. All had developmental delay or intellectual disability ranging from mild to severe. Two had sensorineural deafness. We also identified SLC12A2 variants in 3 individuals with non-syndromic bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular areflexia. The SLC12A2 de novo mutation rate was demonstrated to be significantly elevated in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders cohort. All tested variants were shown to reduce cotransporter function in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Analysis of SLC12A2 expression in fetal brain at 16-18 weeks post conception revealed high expression in radial glial cells, compatible with a role in neurogenesis. Gene co-expression analysis in cells robustly expressing SLC12A2 at 16-18 weeks post conception identified a transcriptomic program associated with active neurogenesis. We identify SLC12A2 de novo mutations as the cause of a novel neurodevelopmental disorder and bilateral non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss and provide further data supporting a role for this gene in human neurodevelopment.
Article
Approximately half of congenital hearing impairment cases are inherited, with non-syndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) being the most frequent clinical entity of genetic hearing impairment cases. A family from Cameroon with NSHI was investigated by performing exome sequencing using DNA samples obtained from three family members, followed by direct Sanger sequencing in additional family members and controls participants. We identified an autosomal dominantly inherited novel missense variant [NM_001174116.2:c.918G>T; p.(Q306H)] in DMXL2 gene (MIM:612186) that co-segregates with mild to profound non-syndromic sensorineural hearing impairment . The p.(Q306H) variant which substitutes a highly conserved glutamine residue is predicted deleterious by various bioinformatics tools and is absent from several genome databases. This variant was also neither found in 121 apparently healthy controls without a family history of hearing impairment , nor 112 sporadic NSHI cases from Cameroon. There is one previous report of a large Han Chinese NSHI family that segregates a missense variant in DMXL2. The present study provides additional evidence that DMXL2 is involved in hearing impairment etiology, and we suggest DMXL2 should be considered in diagnostic hearing impairment panels.
Article
Background Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a heterogeneous disease with a diverse clinical and genetic spectrum among populations worldwide. Few cases of pediatric PCD have been reported from China.background Methods Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and genetic results obtained for 75 patients with PCD were retrospectively reviewed at a single center in China. Genetic sequencing was conducted using whole-exome screening. Results Patient median age at diagnosis was 7.0 years (range: 2 months to 14 years). Of 75 patients, 88% (66/75) had chronic wet cough, 77% (58/75) had recurrent sinusitis, 76% (57/75) had bronchiectasis, 40% (30/75) had neonatal respiratory distress, and 28% (21/75) had coexistent asthma. Notably, postinfectious bronchiolitis obliterans (PIBO) as first presentation was found in 8% (6/75) of individuals. Genes with the highest incidence of mutations were DNAH11 (15/51), followed by DNAH5 (9/51), CCDC39 (5/51), DNAH1 (4/51) and CCNO (3/51). Four genes (DNAI1, HEATR2, RSPH9 and DNAAF3) were found in two patients respectively, seven genes (CCDC40, LRRC6, SPAG1, RSPH4A, ARMC4, CCDC114 and DNAH14, a novel gene) were each mutated once. No differences in classical clinical features were observed among patients with commonly observed PCD-associated genotypes. However, three of seven PIBO patients carried DNAH1 mutations.results Interpretation Besides typical clinical features, PIBO was observed as first presentation of pediatric PCD in China. An association of novel gene DNAH14 with PCD was observed, expanding the PCD genotypic spectrum.
Article
In pleiotropic diseases, multiple organ systems are affected causing a variety of clinical manifestations. Here, we report a pleiotropic disorder with a unique constellation of neurological, endocrine, exocrine, and haematological findings that is caused by biallelic MADD variants. MADD, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activating death domain protein, regulates various cellular functions, such as vesicle trafficking, activity of the Rab3 and Rab27 small GTPases, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-induced signalling and prevention of cell death. Through national collaboration and GeneMatcher, we collected 23 patients with 21 different pathogenic MADD variants identified by next-generation sequencing. We clinically evaluated the series of patients and categorized the phenotypes in two groups. Group 1 consists of 14 patients with severe developmental delay, endo- and exocrine dysfunction, impairment of the sensory and autonomic nervous system, and haematological anomalies. The clinical course during the first years of life can be potentially fatal. The nine patients in Group 2 have a predominant neurological phenotype comprising mild-to-severe developmental delay, hypotonia, speech impairment, and seizures. Analysis of mRNA revealed multiple aberrant MADD transcripts in two patient-derived fibroblast cell lines. Relative quantification of MADD mRNA and protein in fibroblasts of five affected individuals showed a drastic reduction or loss of MADD. We conducted functional tests to determine the impact of the variants on different pathways. Treatment of patient-derived fibroblasts with TNF-α resulted in reduced phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2, enhanced activation of the pro-apoptotic enzymes caspase-3 and -7 and increased apoptosis compared to control cells. We analysed internalization of epidermal growth factor in patient cells and identified a defect in endocytosis of epidermal growth factor. We conclude that MADD deficiency underlies multiple cellular defects that can be attributed to alterations of TNF-α-dependent signalling pathways and defects in vesicular trafficking. Our data highlight the multifaceted role of MADD as a signalling molecule in different organs and reveal its physiological role in regulating the function of the sensory and autonomic nervous system and endo- and exocrine glands.
Article
Background Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a heterogeneous disease with a diverse clinical and genetic spectrum among populations worldwide. Few cases of pediatric PCD have been reported from China. Methods: Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and genetic results obtained for 81 patients with PCD were retrospectively reviewed at a single center in China. Genetic sequencing was conducted using whole-exome screening. Results Patient median age at diagnosis was 7.0 years (range: 2 months to 14 years). Of 81 patients, 88% (72/81) had chronic wet cough, 79% (64/81) had recurrent sinusitis, 78% (63/81) had bronchiectasis, 40% (32/81) had neonatal respiratory distress, and 27% (22/81) had coexistent asthma. Notably, post infectious bronchiolitis obliterans (PIBO) as first presentation was found in 9% (7/81) of individuals. Genes with the highest incidence of mutations were DNAH11 (15/64), followed by HYDIN (13/64), DNAH5 (9/64), CCDC39 (5/64), DNAH1 (4/64) and CCNO (3/64). Four genes (DNAI1, HEATR2, RSPH9 and DNAAF3) were found in two patients respectively, seven genes (CCDC40, LRRC6, SPAG1, RSPH4A, ARMC4, CCDC114 and DNAH14, a novel gene) were each mutated once. No differences in classical clinical features were observed among patients with commonly observed PCD-associated genotypes. However, three of seven PIBO patients carried DNAH1 mutations. Conclusion Besides typical clinical features, PIBO was often observed as first presentation of pediatric PCD in China. High HYDIN variant frequency and an association of DNAH14 with PCD were observed, demonstrating PCD genetic heterogeneity in China and expanding the PCD genotypic spectrum.