Technical ReportPDF Available

Triakis megalopterus.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020

Authors:
  • Singapore Oceanarium, Resorts World Sentosa
  • CPAWS-BC (Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - British Columbia)
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2020: T39362A124406649
Scope(s): Global
Language: English
Triakis megalopterus, Spotted Gully Shark
Assessment by: Pollom, R., Da Silva, C., Gledhill, K., McCord, M.E. & Winker, H.
View on www.iucnredlist.org
Citation: Pollom, R., Da Silva, C., Gledhill, K., McCord, M.E. & Winker, H. 2020. Triakis megalopterus.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T39362A124406649.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
Copyright: © 2020 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written
permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written
permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN
Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State
University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe;
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London.
If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with
feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Animalia Chordata Chondrichthyes Carcharhiniformes Triakidae
Scientific Name:ÊÊTriakis megalopterus (Smith, 1839)
Synonym(s):
Mustelus megalopterus Smith, 1839
Common Name(s):
• English: Spotted Gully Shark
• Afrikaans: Sloephaai
Taxonomic Source(s):
Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W.N. and Van der Laan, R. (eds). 2020. Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes: genera,
species, references. Updated 02 March 2020. Available at:
http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp.
Assessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Least Concern ver 3.1
Year Published: 2020
Date Assessed: August 1, 2019
Justification:
The Spotted Gully Shark (Triakis megalopterus) is a medium-sized (to 208 cm total length) demersal
houndshark endemic to southern Africa in the Southeast Atlantic and Western Indian Oceans from
Angola to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. It inhabits shallow sandy areas and rocky crevices on the
continental shelf to a depth of 50 m. The species has a late age-at-maturity and a long gestation period
that lead to low productivity and vulnerability to overfishing. It is caught extensively in recreational line
fisheries and occasionally as a minor bycatch species in beach seine, longline, and trawl fisheries.
Recreational fishers typically release this species. Catches of the Spotted Gully Shark in the commercial
and recreational line fisheries in False Bay, South Africa peaked in 1990 and declined thereafter. Trend
analysis of 21 years of catch-per-unit-effort data from 1996–2017 from the De Hoop Marine Protected
Area (MPA), South Africa indicate an increase in population over the past three generation lengths (60
years). Commercial fishing for Spotted Gully Shark is prohibited in South Africa with minimal bycatch of
this species and recreational fishing permitted but regulated. Hence, this data from the MPA may
approximate the trends of the species in the region. There are currently no data available from other
areas, but given an estimated increase in South Africa over the past three generations (60 years), the
typical release of this species by recreational fishers, likely low post-release mortality, and mostly low
fishing pressure elsewhere, it is suspected that the population trend is stable over the past three
generation lengths (60 years) and is not suspected to be close to reaching the population decline
threshold. Therefore, the Spotted Gully Shark is assessed as Least Concern.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
1
For further information about this species, see Supplementary Material.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
2009 – Near Threatened (NT)
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009-2.RLTS.T39362A10216379.en
2000 – Lower Risk/near threatened (LR/NT)
Geographic Range
Range Description:
The Spotted Gully Shark is a southern African endemic that occurs from southern Angola to KwaZulu-
Natal, South Africa in the Southeast Atlantic and Western Indian Oceans (Ebert et al. 2013).
Country Occurrence:
Native, Extant (resident): Angola; Namibia; South Africa
FAO Marine Fishing Areas:
Native: Indian Ocean - western
Native: Atlantic - southeast
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
2
Distribution Map
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
3
Population
There are no range-wide population size or trend estimates for this species. Population trend data of
standardized catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) (number of fish per angler per day) for 1997–2017 (21
years) were available from the De Hoop Marine Protected Area (MPA) shore-based research angling
surveys conducted by the South African Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA, unpubl. data,
2018). The trend data were analyzed over three generation lengths using a Bayesian state-space
framework (Winker and Sherley 2019). This analysis yields an annual rate of change, a median
change over three generation lengths, and the probability of the most likely IUCN Red List category
percent change over three generations (see the Supplementary Information).
The trend analysis revealed an annual rate of increase of 2.6%, consistent with an estimated median
increase of 115.3% over the past three generation lengths (60 years), with the highest probability
(99.9%) of an increase over three generation lengths. The De Hoop MPA was established in 1985 and is
a no-take reserve, and this may not be representative of the population trends in fished areas of South
Africa. However, commercial fishing for Spotted Gully Shark is prohibited in South Africa with minimal
bycatch of this species and recreational fishing is permitted but regulated. Hence, it may approximate
the trends of the species in the region.
In False Bay, South Africa, catches of this species in the recreational and commercial line fisheries
peaked in 1990, declined afterwards, and remained low suggesting over-exploitation in that locality
(Best et al. 2013). A demographic analysis of the Spotted Gully Shark in South Africa indicated that it is
sensitive to overfishing but in the absence of fishing mortality, the population is stable (Booth et al.
2011). This species is likely exposed to minimal fishing pressure in Namibia and some intense fishing
pressure in a few locations in southern Angola, with unfished areas in other parts of its Angola range.
Overall, the population is increasing in parts of its range over the past three generations lengths (60
years) and is exposed to minimal commercial fishing pressure and regulated recreational fishing across
much of its range (i.e. South Africa). Exposure to intense fishing pressure occurs only over a small
portion of its range. Thus, the population is suspected to be stable over the past three generation
lengths (60 years) and the species is not suspected to be close to reaching the population decline
threshold.
For further information about this species, see Supplementary Material.
Current Population Trend:ÊÊStable
Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information)
The Spotted Gully Shark is a demersal houndshark that inhabits shallow sandy areas and rocky crevices
on the continental shelf to a depth of 50 m, but usually less than 10 m depth (Ebert et al. 2013,
Weigmann 2016). It reaches a maximum size of 208 cm total length (TL), males mature at 125 cm TL and
females mature at 140 cm TL (Ebert et al. 2013). Reproduction is lecithotrophic viviparous with litter
sizes of 5–15 pups, a gestation period of 19–21 months, a two to three-year reproductive cycle, and size-
at-birth of 40 cm TL (Smale and Goosen 1999, Ebert et al. 2013). Female age-at-maturity is estimated as
15 years and maximum age as 25 years; generation length is therefore estimated as 20 years (Booth et
al. 2011).
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
4
Systems:ÊÊMarine
Use and Trade
The meat from the Spotted Gully Shark is sometimes dried and sold locally as shark 'biltong' or jerky, or
exported fresh or frozen to Europe or Taiwan (Da Silva and Bürgener 2007, Compagno 2009). Since
prohibition on commercial catch, this species is often deliberately mislabeled so that it can be marketed
for its meat (C. Da Silva, unpubl. data, 2018).
Threats (see Appendix for additional information)
The Spotted Gully Shark is targeted in recreational line fisheries and occasionally taken as bycatch in
beach seine, commercial line, longline, and trawl fisheries (Compagno 2009, Booth et al. 2011, Best et
al. 2013, Belhabib et al. 2015, da Silva et al. 2015). Recreational fishers typically release this species in
South Africa, and some houndsharks have been shown to have low post-release mortality (Ellis et al.
2017). Effort in South African shore line fisheries has decreased as a result of a 2002 South African ban
on all-terrain vehicles on beaches. Parts of Namibia are remote and offer refuge from fishing pressure
(Belhabib et al. 2015). Since 2002, artisanal and recreational fishing pressure in a few parts of southern
Angola has increased while other areas remain unfished (Beckensteiner et al. 2016).
Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information)
This species was declared a prohibited commercial species in 2005 (DEAT 2005). However, since this
prohibition, deliberate misreporting as other species in order to sell it illegally is an ongoing issue (C. Da
Silva, unpubl. data, 2018). In South Africa, the Spotted Gully Shark is a legislated recreational species
and recreational anglers in South Africa are restricted to one shark per species per day (maximum of 10
individuals per day) (DEAT 2005), although enforcement is an ongoing issue. A number of protected
areas occur in South Africa across its range, including: the West Coast National Park, the iSimangaliso
Marine Protected Area (MPA), and the uThukela MPA. Further research is needed on population size and
trends.
Credits
Assessor(s): Pollom, R., Da Silva, C., Gledhill, K., McCord, M.E. & Winker, H.
Reviewer(s): Dulvy, N.K. & Kyne, P.M.
Contributor(s): Herman, K. & Rigby, C.L.
Facilitator(s) and
Compiler(s):
Kyne, P.M., Pollom, R. & Dulvy, N.K.
Authority/Authorities: IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group (sharks and rays)
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
5
Bibliography
Beckensteiner, J., Kaplan, D.M., Potts, W.M., Santos, C.V. and O’Farrell, M.R. 2016. Data-limited
population-status evaluation of two coastal fishes in southern Angola using recreational catch length-
frequency data. PLOS ONE 11(2): e0147834.
Belhabib, D., Willemse, N.E. and Pauly, D. 2015. A fishery tale: Namibian fisheries between 1950 and
2010. Working Paper Series. Working Paper #2015-65. Fisheries Centre, University of British Colombia.
Best, L.N., Attwood, C.G., da Silva, C. and Lamberth, S.J. 2013. Chondrichthyan occurrence and
abundance trends in False Bay, South Africa, spanning a century of catch and survey records. African
Zoology 48(2): 201–227.
Booth, A.J., Foulis, A.J. and Smale, M.J. 2011. Age validation, growth, mortality, and demographic
modeling of spotted gully shark (Triakis megalopterus) from the southeast coast of South Africa. Fishery
Bulletin 109(1): 101-112.
Compagno, L.J.V. 2009. Triakis megalopterus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009:
e.T39362A10216379. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009-
2.RLTS.T39362A10216379.en.
Da Silva, C. and Bürgener, M. 2007. South Africa’s demersal shark meat harvest. TRAFFIC Bulletin 21:
55–65.
da Silva, C., Booth, A.J., Dudley, S.F.J., Kerwath, S.E., Lamberth, S.J., Leslie, R.W., McCord, M.E., Sauer,
W.H.H. and Zweig, T. 2015. The current status and management of South Africa's chondrichthyan
fisheries. African Journal of Marine Science 37(2): 233-248.
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT). 2005. Marine Living Resources Act, 1988.
Amendments to Regulations. No. 329 6 April 2005. Government Notice, Government Gazette South
Africa (No. 27453).
Ebert, D.A., Fowler, S. and Compagno, L. 2013. Sharks of the World. Wild Nature Press, Plymouth.
Ellis, J.R., McCully Philips, S.R. and Poisson, F. 2017. A review of capture and postrelease mortality of
elasmobranchs. Journal of Fish Biology 90(3): 653–722.
IUCN. 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org.
(Accessed: 13 June 2020).
Smale. M.J. and Goosen, A.J.J. 1999. Reproduction and feeding of spotted gully shark, Triakis
megalopterus, off the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Fishery Bulletin 97: 987-998.
Weigmann, S. 2016. Annotated checklist of the living sharks, batoids and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) of
the world, with a focus on biogeographical diversity. Journal of Fish Biology 88(3): 837-1037.
Winker, H, Pacoureau, N. and Sherley, R.B. 2020. JARA: 'Just Another Red List Assessment'. BioRiv
Preprint: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/672899.
Citation
Pollom, R., Da Silva, C., Gledhill, K., McCord, M.E. & Winker, H. 2020. Triakis megalopterus. The IUCN Red
List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T39362A124406649. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-
2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
6
Disclaimer
To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use.
External Resources
For Supplementary Material, and for Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the
Red List website.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
7
Appendix
Habitats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Habitat Season Suitability Major
Importance?
9. Marine Neritic -> 9.2. Marine Neritic - Subtidal Rock and Rocky Reefs Resident Suitable Yes
9. Marine Neritic -> 9.4. Marine Neritic - Subtidal Sandy Resident Suitable Yes
Use and Trade
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
End Use Local National International
Food - human No No No
Threats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score
5. Biological resource use -> 5.4. Fishing & harvesting
aquatic resources -> 5.4.1. Intentional use:
(subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
Ongoing Minority (50%) No decline Low impact: 4
Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
5. Biological resource use -> 5.4. Fishing & harvesting
aquatic resources -> 5.4.3. Unintentional effects:
(subsistence/small scale) [harvest]
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
No decline Low impact: 5
Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
5. Biological resource use -> 5.4. Fishing & harvesting
aquatic resources -> 5.4.4. Unintentional effects:
(large scale) [harvest]
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
No decline Low impact: 5
Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
Conservation Actions in Place
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Conservation Action in Place
In-place research and monitoring
Action Recovery Plan: No
Systematic monitoring scheme: No
In-place land/water protection
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
8
Conservation Action in Place
Conservation sites identified: No
Area based regional management plan: No
Occurs in at least one protected area: Yes
Invasive species control or prevention: Not Applicable
In-place species management
Harvest management plan: Yes
Successfully reintroduced or introduced benignly: No
Subject to ex-situ conservation: No
In-place education
Subject to recent education and awareness programmes: No
Included in international legislation: No
Subject to any international management / trade controls: No
Research Needed
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Research Needed
1. Research -> 1.2. Population size, distribution & trends
Additional Data Fields
Distribution
Lower depth limit (m): 50
Upper depth limit (m): 0
Habitats and Ecology
Generation Length (years): 20
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
9
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2020: T39362A124406649
Scope(s): Global
Language: English
The IUCN Red List Partnership
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species
Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership.
The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens
Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew;
Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Triakis megalopterus – published in 2020.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T39362A124406649.en
10
... The spotted gully shark Triakis megalopterus (also known as the sharptooth houndshark) in the family Triakidae is a mesopredatory species endemic to southern Africa (southern Angola, Namibia and South Africa) (Figure 1a), feeding on benthic species such as teleosts, molluscs and crustaceans (Soekoe 2016). While currently listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Pollom et al. 2020), this species remains a target for recreational fishers, which leads to post-release stress from catch and release practices (Cooke and Schramm 2007). This species is also indirectly targeted by commercial linefishers (Ebert et al. 2021) through misidentification with other triakid species (e.g. the common smooth-hound Mustelus mustelus and soupfin shark Galeorhinus galeus: Booth et al. 2011;da Silva et al. 2015). ...
... very close inshore or in rocky gullies not suited to receiver deployment: Stehfest et al. 2015). Standardised catch-per-unit-effort data from the De Hoop MPA were previously used to assess the conservation status of the spotted gully shark (Pollom et al. 2020). While results showed that it is not a principal aggregation area for this species, with more detection events occurring in the Whale Sanctuary area than at De Hoop, an increase of the population around De Hoop might mask a decrease in other areas. ...
... This study revealed that tagged spotted gully sharks exhibited nonrandom movements with patterns of spatial segregation by sex, along with co-occurrence between individuals. Movement data showed that future assessment of the population should not be based only in the De Hoop MPA (Pollom et al. 2020), but should also include data from Walker Bay and False Bay. Existing MPAs located along the Western Cape coastline were commonly visited by spotted gully sharks, but the results suggest that principal aggregation areas might not fall within MPA boundaries. ...
Article
The spotted gully shark Triakis megalopterus (Triakidae) is a mesopredatory species endemic to southern Africa. It is currently listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List in accordance with an estimated increase in population size, general release by recreational linefishers and incidental catches in the commercial linefisheries. Previous research suggests this species to be resident, and as such it is likely to receive protection in coastal marine protected areas (MPAs). However, its ecology and movement behaviour remain poorly studied. This study employed acoustic telemetry to provide information on the species’ movements along the coast of the Western Cape Province, South Africa. We used network analyses to investigate movement randomness, associations between individuals, sexual segregation, and the effectiveness of MPAs. Our findings reveal nonrandom movements as well as patterns of co-occurrence between individuals. Spatial network analysis suggested sexual segregation, because areas of high use (Walker Bay and De Hoop) differed between males and females. Co-occurrences were observed exclusively in Walker Bay, chiefly between males, with no co-occurrence found between females. The tagged spotted gully sharks were not detected extensively within existing MPA boundaries, though there was no significant difference between their movements inside and outside protected areas for both sexes.
... comm.). The most recent IUCN Red List assessment classified T. megalopterus as Least Concern (Pollom et al. 2020), stating that the population is suspected to be stable over the past three generation lengths (60 years) and is not suspected to be close to the threshold of a population in decline. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Identifying species at risk of extinction is necessary to prioritise conservation efforts. The International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is the global standard for quantifying extinction risk, with many species categorised on the basis of a reduction in population size. We introduce the Bayesian state-space framework ‘JARA’ (Just Another Red-List Assessment). Designed as decision-support tool, JARA allows both process error and uncertainty to be incorporated into IUCN Red List assessments under criterion A. JARA outputs easy to interpret graphics showing the posterior probability of the population decline displayed against the IUCN Red List categories, and assigns each category an associated probability given process and observation uncertainty. JARA is designed to be easy to use, rapid and widely applicable, so conservation practitioners can apply it to their own count or relative abundance data. We illustrate JARA using three real-world examples: (1) relative abundance indices for two elasmobranchs, Yellowspotted Skate Leucoraja wallacei and Whitespot Smoothhound Mustelus palumbes; (2) a comparison of standardized abundance indices for Atlantic Blue Marlin Makaira nigricans and (3) absolute abundance data for Cape Gannets Morus capensis. Finally, using a simulation experiment, we demonstrate how JARA provides greater accuracy than two approaches commonly used to assigning a Red List Status under criterion A. Tools like JARA can help further standardise Red List evaluations, increasing objectivity and lowering the risk of misclassification. The consequences for global conservation efforts could be substantial.
Article
Full-text available
An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, batoids and chimaeras) of the world is presented. As of 7 November 2015, the number of species totals 1188, comprising 16 orders, 61 families and 199 genera. The checklist includes nine orders, 34 families, 105 genera and 509 species of sharks; six orders, 24 families, 88 genera and 630 species of batoids (skates and rays); one order, three families, six genera and 49 species of holocephalans (chimaeras). The most speciose shark orders are the Carcharhiniformes with 284 species, followed by the Squaliformes with 119. The most species-rich batoid orders are the Rajiformes with 285 species and the Myliobatiformes with 210. This checklist represents the first global checklist of chondrichthyans to include information on maximum size, geographic and depth distributions, as well as comments on taxonomically problematic species and recent and regularly overlooked synonymizations. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the biogeographical diversity of the species across 10 major areas of occurrence is given, including updated figures for previously published hotspots of chondrichthyan biodiversity, providing the detailed numbers of chondrichthyan species per major area, and revealing centres of distribution for several taxa.
Article
Full-text available
Chondrichthyans (sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras) are captured in many marine fisheries. Management and research efforts directed at chondrichthyan fishing are often neglected because of low product value, taxonomic uncertainty, low capture rates, and harvesting by multiple fisheries. In South Africa's diverse fishery sectors, which include artisanal as well as highly industrialised fisheries, 99 (49%) of 204 chondrichthyan species that occur in southern Africa are targeted regularly or taken as bycatch. Total reported dressed catch for 2010, 2011 and 2012 was estimated to be 3 375 t, 3 241 t and 2 527 t, respectively. Two‑thirds of the reported catch was bycatch. Regulations aimed at limiting chondrichthyan catches, coupled with species‑specific permit conditions, currently exist in the following fisheries: demersal shark longline, pelagic longline, recreational line, and beach‑seine and gillnet. Limited management measures are currently in place for chondrichthyans captured in other South African fisheries. Catch and effort dataseries suitable for stock assessments exist for fewer than 10 species. Stock assessments have been attempted for five shark species: soupfin Galeorhinus galeus, smoothhound Mustelus mustelus, white Carcharodon carcharias, spotted ragged‑tooth Carcharias taurus, and spotted gully Triakis megalopterus. Fishery‑independent surveys and fishery observer data, which can be used as a measure of relative abundance, exist for 67 species. Compared with most developing countries, South African shark fishing is relatively well controlled and managed. As elsewhere, incidental capture and bycatch remain challenges to the appropriate management of shark species. In 2013, South Africa's National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (NPOA‑Sharks) was published. Implementation of the NPOA‑Sharks should help to improve chondrichthyan management in the near future.
Article
Full-text available
Excessive truncation of a population’s size structure is often identified as an important deleterious effect of exploitation, yet the effect of this truncation on population persistence is seldom quantified. In this study, we estimate changes in eggs per recruit (EPR) using annual length-frequency samples over a 9 year period to assess persistence of the two most important recreational fishes in southern Angola: west coast dusky kob (Argyrosomus coronus) and leerfish (Lichia amia). Using a length- and age-structured model, we improve on an existing method to fit this type of model to length-frequency data and estimate EPR. The objectives of the methodological changes are to add considerable flexibility and robustness to the approach for assessing population status in data-limited situations. Results indicate that dusky kob presents very low levels of EPR (5%-10% of virgin reproductive output) in 2013, whereas large inter-annual variability in leerfish estimates suggest caution must be applied when drawing conclusions about its exploitation status. Using simulated length frequency data with known parameter values, we demonstrate that recruitment decline due to overexploitation leads to overestimation of EPR values. Considering the low levels of EPR estimated for the study species, recruitment limitation is not impossible and true EPR values may be even lower than our estimates. It is, therefore, likely that management action, such as the creation of Marine Protected Areas, is needed to reconstitute the west coast dusky kob population.
Article
Full-text available
Commercial fishing in False Bay, South Africa, began in the 1600s. Today chondrichthyans are regularly taken in fisheries throughout the bay. Using a combination of catch, survey and life history data, the occurrence and long-term changes in populations of chondrichthyans in False Bay are described. Analyses of time series data from five fishing methods between 1897 and 2011 provided trends in relative abundance. Of the 37 species found in False Bay, 25 showed no significant trends for any fishing method. Of the 12 species and two genera with catch trends, four showed a common trend across methods, two increasing (Mustelus mustelus and Carcharhinus brachyurus) and two decreasing (Galeorhinus galeus and Raja spp.), while another two species (Triakis megalopterus and Isurus oxyrinchus) showed highly significant declines in one method only. A productivity index was used in conjunction with information on species distribution, catch frequency and trends in abundance to assess the vulnerability of False Bay chondrichthyans. Among the various habitats and depth strata, the surf-zone has been most impacted by exploitation, whereas the conservation of deep-water, soft-sediment species has benefited from the ban on trawling in False Bay implemented in 1928. Continued monitoring using catch data from beach-seine, recreational shore-angling and the commercial linefishery is recommended, along with improved species identification.
Article
Full-text available
Anumber of demersal shark species are processed in South Africa for export to Australia, where there is high consumer demand for shark fillets that cannot be met by Australia’s shark fishing industry. Most of these sharks are caught as by-catch but some are targeted in a number of South African fisheries. This paper examines the harvest of demersal sharks in South Africa, and the processing of demersal shark meat destined for export to Australia. Trade statistics for demersal shark products traded between the two countries during the period 1998 to 2005 were reviewed. The study shows that there is limited management and monitoring of the catch and trade in these species and related products; these inadequate regulatory controls, coupled with the increased targeting of demersal sharks in the South African traditional linefishery, could make certain species vulnerable to over-harvesting. Further, there are discrepancies in the import and export datasets for the two countries, and both the catch figures and trade data lack the necessary detail for effective monitoring and regulation of the catch and trade. Capacity building of compliance officers to improve identification of demersal shark products in trade is required and trade data discrepancies should be resolved. A review of trade categories used by Australia and South Africa for shark products in trade would assist in monitoring the trade.
Article
There is a need to better understand the survivorship of discarded fishes, both for commercial stocks and species of conservation concern. Within European waters, the landing obligations that are currently being phased in as part of the European Union's reformed common fisheries policy means that an increasing number of fish stocks, with certain exceptions, should not be discarded unless it can be demonstrated that there is a high probability of survival. This study reviews the various approaches that have been used to examine the discard survival of elasmobranchs, both in terms of at-vessel mortality (AVM) and post-release mortality (PRM), with relevant findings summarized for both the main types of fishing gear used and by taxonomic group. Discard survival varies with a range of biological attributes (species, size, sex and mode of gill ventilation) as well as the range of factors associated with capture (e.g. gear type, soak time, catch mass and composition, handling practices and the degree of exposure to air and any associated change in ambient temperature). In general, demersal species with buccal-pump ventilation have a higher survival than obligate ram ventilators. Several studies have indicated that females may have a higher survival than males. Certain taxa (including hammerhead sharks Sphyrna spp. and thresher sharks Alopias spp.) may be particularly prone to higher rates of mortality when caught.
Article
The spotted gully shark, Triakis megalopterus, was sampled opportunistically over a 12-year period from catches of shore and ski-boat fishermen using hooks and lines. Most specimens (89.6%) were taken from rocky reefs less than 10 m deep, 8% were caught at 11-20 m, and only 2.4% were recorded from waters more than- 20 m deep. The reproductive biology of 35 males and 87 females was examined. The spotted gully shark exhibits aplacental viviparity. Size at 50% maturity for males is ca. 1320 mm total length (TL) and for females ca. 1450 mm TL. Maximum sizes recorded here were 1520 mm TL for males and 2075 mm TL for females. Gestation appears to last 19-21 months. The female reproductive cycle may be 2-3 years, depending on the time between pregnancies. The sex ratio of embryos was found to be 1:1 but the postpartum male:female ratio was 1:2.5. Size at birth was estimated to be 420-450 mm TL. The smallest free-swimming individual recorded was 576 mm TL. Number of embryos per pregnancy ranged between 5 and 15, with a mean of 9.7. A total of 110 stomachs were examined in the feeding study. Diet changed with increase in shark size. Small sharks (<1 m) preyed mainly on Cape rock crabs, Plagusia chabrus (78% of mass), whereas sharks of 1-1.4 m preyed largely on Cape rock crabs (48%) and cephalopods (33%). Teleosts were more important for sharks larger than 1.4 m (54%); most of these prey were associated with rocky reefs.
Article
This study documents validation of vertebral band-pair formation in spotted gully shark (Triakis megalopterus) with the use of f luorochrome injection and tagging of captive and wild sharks over a 21-year period. Growth and mortality rates of T. megalopterus were also estimated and a demographic analysis of the species was conducted. Of the 23 OTC (oxytetracycline) -marked vertebrae examined (12 from captive and 11 from wild sharks), seven vertebrae (three from captive and four from wild sharks) exhibited chelation of the OTC and f luoresced under ultraviolet light. It was concluded that a single opaque and translucent band pair was deposited annually up to at least 25 years of age, the maximum age recorded. Reader precision was assessed by using an index of average percent error calculated at 5%. No significant differences were found between male and female growth patterns (P>0.05), and von Bertalanffy growth model parameters for combined sexes were estimated to be L∞=1711.07 mm TL, k=0.11/yr and t0= -2.43 yr (n=86). Natural mortality was estimated at 0.17/yr. Age at maturity was estimated at 11 years for males and 15 years for females. Results of the demographic analysis showed that the population, in the absence of fishing mortality, was stable and not significantly different from zero and particularly sensitive to overfishing. At the current age at first capture and natural mortality rate, the fishing mortality rate required to result in negative population growth was low at F>0.004/ yr. Elasticity analysis revealed that juvenile survival was the principal factor in explaining variability in population growth rate.
Triakis megalopterus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
  • L J V Compagno
Compagno, L.J.V. 2009. Triakis megalopterus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e.T39362A10216379. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009-