Content uploaded by Maria Papandreou
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Maria Papandreou on Apr 11, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Title: THE INTRA-RATER AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF SCAPULAR
ASSYMETRY ASSESSMENT IN VOLLEYBALL ATHLETES
WITH CLINICAL EVALUATION METHODS
Authors: Paraskevopoulos E., Plakoutsis, G., Gioftsos, G., Georgoudis, G., Papandreou, M.
Affiliations: Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica
contact: mpapand@uniwa.gr
Introduction
It has been suggested that Scapular
Asymmetries (SA) can have a significant
effect on shoulder function and in the
development of shoulder pain. Several
clinical evaluation methods of SA have
been used in the past in order to detect SA.
However, less is known about the intra-
rater reliability of these methods in
professional volleyball players. This study
aimed to establish the intra-rater and inter-
rater reliability of five different methods
for quantifying SA in asymptomatic
professional volleyball players.
Methods
Reliability values for the first and the second
method were excellent for the inter-rater
(ICC 0.90-0.97;SEM 0.17-0.16) and the
intra-rater (ICC 0.90-0.98; SEM 0.16-0.13)
evaluation. For the third method, the inter-
rater and the intra-rater values were good to
excellent (ICC 0.84-0.92;SEM 0.23-0.13).
Results
Conclusion
Ten male asymptomatic professional
volleyball players were recruited
(Age 30.5±2.67 years, BMI 23.1±0.32).
The findings of the present study propose
several reliable methods for evaluating SA
of asymptomatic male professional
volleyball players in clinical practice.
The Bland and Altman plots constructed in
the study, along with the SEM and the SDD
calculations, allowed us to speculate that
these five measurements methods should
reliably measure male asymptomatic
overhead athletes.
Five methods measured a series of
anthropometric characteristics of the
scapula including 1) height asymmetries of
the scapulae, 2) the difference in the
distance between the scapulae from the
spine, 3) the difference in the posterior
displacement of each scapula from the
thoracic cage with a modified caliper, as
well as, 4, 5) the posterior displacement of
both scapulae from the thoracic cage in a
static and a dynamic position (Fig 1).
Table 1. SH: Scapular Height, DS: Distance from Scapula, SPD: difference in Scapular inferior angle Posterior
Displacement between the right and the left scapula, SPDR: Scapular medial border Posterior Displacement at
Rest, SPD-PUE: Scapular medial border Posterior Displacement during the sitting hand Press-Up Exercise,
SD: Standard Deviations, ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficient CI: Confidence interval, SEM: Standard error
of measurement, SDD: Smallest Detectable Difference.
Figure 2. Bland and Altman plot shows the average of measurement values of the method of Scapular medial
border Posterior Displacement at Rest (SPDR) obtained by the first examiner in test/retest plotted against the
difference between the first and second measurement
Figure 1. Clinical evaluation methods for the assessment of 1) height asymmetries of the scapulae,
2) the difference in the distance between the scapulae from the spine, 3) the difference in the posterior
displacement of each scapula from the thoracic cage with a modified caliper, 4, 5) the posterior displacement
of both scapulae from the thoracic cage in a static and a dynamic position
12
3
4 5
The last two methods showed good to
acceptable inter-rater (ICC 0.70-0.68; SEM
0.23-0.27) and intra-rater values (ICC
0.66-0.77; SEM 0.20 for both) (Table 1).
The Bland–Altman analysis showed that all
the data were inside the 95% confidence
limits and regression analysis did not reveal
any statistically significant proportional
bias (Fig 2).
References
•Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part III: The SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(6):641-61.
•Burn MB, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, Liberman SR, Harris JD. Prevalence of Scapular Dyskinesis in Overhead and Nonoverhead Athletes:A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4(2).
•Du WY, Huang TS, Hsu KC, Lin JJ. Measurement of scapular medial border and inferior angle prominence using a novel scapulometer: A reliability and validity study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017; 32:120-6.
•Gumina S, Carbone S, Postacchini F. Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome in patients with chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(1):40-5.
•Hong J, Barnes MJ, Leddon CE, Van Ryssegem G, Alamar B. Reliability of the sitting hand press-up test for identifying and quantifying the level of scapular medial border posterior displacement in overhead athletes. Int J
Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 6(4):306-11
•Kibler WB. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(2):325-37
Intra
-Rater
Inter
-rater
Methods
Mean
±SD
ICC
95
%CI
Lower
–Upper
Bound
SEM
SDD
1
.SH
1
.18 ±0.51
1
.21 ±0.55
0
.90
0
.90
0
.66-0.97
0
.65-0.97
0
.16
0
.17
0
.44
0
.48
2
.DS
1
.23 ±0.94
1
.26 ± 0.96
0
.98
0
.97
0
.94-0.99
0
.90-0.99
0
.13
0
.16
0
.36
0
.45
3
.SPD
0
.64 ±0.49
0
.62 ± 0.58
0
.92
0
.84
0
.71-0.98
0
.49-0.95
0
.13
0
.23
0
.38
0
.64
4
. SPDR
1
.3 ±0.35
1
.32 ± 0.42
0
.66
0
.70
0
.14-0.90
0
.16-0.91
0
.20
0
.23
0
.56
0
.63
5
.SPD-PUE
1
.67 ±0.43
1
.68 ±0.48
0
.77
0
.68
0
.34-0.93
0
.16-0.91
0
.20
0
.27
1
.56
0
.75