A preview of this full-text is provided by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Content available from Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
JSLHR
Clinical Focus
Developmental Courses in Childhood
Dysarthria: Longitudinal Analyses of
Auditory-Perceptual Parameters
Elisabet Haas,
a
Wolfram Ziegler,
a
and Theresa Schölderle
a
Purpose: The aim of this longitudinal study was to describe
developmental courses of childhood dysarthria against
the background of typical speech motor development by
collecting auditory-perceptual data.
Method: Fourteen children (four girls, 10 boys; 5;1–8;4 [years;
months] at Time 1) with neurological conditions (CNC) and
14 typically developing children (CTD) matched for age
and gender were assessed at three points in time over an
18-month period. Speech samples were collected using
the Bogenhausener Dysarthrie Skalen–Kindliche Dysarthrien
(BoDyS-KiD; in English: Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales–
Childhood Dysarthria), a German tool for the assessment
of childhood dysarthria, and analyzed by means of nine
perceptual scales covering all clinically relevant speech
components. Age normalization was performed according
to a method published recently. Data from the matched
controls were used to estimate whether the gradients of the
CNC group’s developmental trajectories exceeded those
of typical development.
Results: The children with neurological conditions presented
heterogeneous speech profiles with a wide range of severity.
At the group level, relatively stable trajectories of the age-
normalized dysarthria total score were found over the
observation period. The nine perceptual scales showed
more or less parallel developments. All patients except two
followed the growth curve describing the developmental
course of the typically developing children.
Conclusions: Most children took advantage of the
developmental dynamics as they developed parallel to
the age norm. With its comprehensive description of the
developmental courses of 14 children with neurological
conditions, this study may contribute to a more valid,
statistically verified clinical assessment of the course of
childhood dysarthria.
Many children with neurological conditions show
symptoms of dysarthria. The most relevant
cause of childhood dysarthria is cerebral palsy
(CP), with up to 90% of the affected children experiencing
dysarthria (Bax et al., 2006; Mei et al., 2014; Nordberg
et al., 2013). Furthermore, other neurological conditions
can also cause dysarthria, such as cerebellar or brainstem
tumors (Murdoch & Hudson-Tennent, 1994; Richter et al.,
2005; van Mourik et al., 1998) and traumatic brain injury
(Cahill et al., 2002, 2003, 2005). Dysarthria usually manifests
itself on all functionally relevant components of speech,
that is, speech breathing, voice production, articulation/
resonance, and prosody. As a result, perceptual deviations
of speech features can occur to varying degrees in any one
or several of these components (Duffy, 2013; Workinger &
Kent, 1991).
Dysarthric impairment in most cases interferes with
the children’s ability to communicate, compromising, for
instance, intelligibility and naturalness of speech (Hustad
et al., 2018, 2012; Patel et al., 2012; Pennington & Mc-
Conachie, 2001). As a consequence, research indicates that
the children’s social and educational participation is often
restricted, and their quality of life can be negatively af-
fected (Dickinson et al., 2007; Fauconnier et al., 2009;
Mei et al., 2014; Pennington & McConachie, 2001). This
is especially burdening as children with dysarthria—due
to the early onset of the disorder—are confronted with
these limitations throughout their entire lives. An early
diagnosis and detailed characterization of the speech dis-
order of affected children are therefore essential to ensure
adequate treatment at an early stage in order to achieve
maximum treatment outcomes (Romski & Sevcik, 2005;
Sigurdardottir & Vik, 2011).
a
Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group, Institute of Phonetics
and Speech Processing, LMU Munich, Germany
Correspondence to Elisabet Haas: elisabet.haas@ekn-muenchen.de
Editor-in-Chief: Bharath Chandrasekaran
Editor: Stephanie Borrie
Received August 19, 2020
Revision received October 30, 2020
Accepted December 15, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00492
Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing interests existed at the time
of publication.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research •Vol. 64 •1421–1435 •May 2021 •Copyright © 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1421