A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Measurement invariance of entrepreneurial personality in relation
to sex, age, and self-employment
Álvaro Postigo
1
&Eduardo García-Cueto
1
&José Muñiz
2
&Covadonga González-Nuevo
1
&Marcelino Cuesta
1
Accepted: 26 March 2021
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
The analysis of sociodemographic variables such as age and sex has demonstrated their importance in entrepreneurial activity.
Therefore, it is important to study the role these variables play in entrepreneurial personality. The aim of this research was to
examine measurement invariance of the Battery for the Assessment of the Enterprising Personality (BEPE), and to study the
differences in entrepreneurial personality as a function of sex, age, and being self-employed or not. The sample comprised 1170
participants (>30 years old: 76.1%; women: 60%; self-employed: 13%). We analyzed various levels of measurement invariance:
configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance. The BEPE showed measurement invariance with respect to age, sex and type
of employment at all of the invariance levels. We also found differences in entrepreneurial personality as a function of these
sociodemographic variables.
Keywords Invariance .Equivalence .Factor structure .Sex .Age .Self-employment .Entrepreneurial personality
Introduction
Studying entrepreneurial activity is fundamental for the growth
and development of every country (OECD, 2019), as various
international reports have shown, including Entrepreneurship
at a Glance (OECD, 2018)andGlobal Entrepreneurship
Monitor (GEM, 2020). When it comes to attempting to explain
what underlies someone becoming an entrepreneur there have
been various approaches from the economic (Obschonka et al.,
2015) and sociological (Chell, 2008), to the psychological
(Baum et al., 2007; Frese & Gielnik, 2014). One of the different
lines of research in the psychological approach is individuals’
personal characteristics, with the study of entrepreneurial per-
sonality standing out (Kerr et al., 2018; Rauch & Frese, 2007b).
Entrepreneurial personality can be studied from global Big
Five-type models (Zhao et al., 2010), or through specific per-
sonality traits (Muñiz et al., 2014; Rauch & Frese, 2007a).
In line with the two theoretical approaches, various measur-
ing instruments have been developed based on the Big Five
(Sartori et al., 2016) and specific traits of entrepreneurial per-
sonality (Muñiz et al., 2014; Rauch & Frese, 2007a). Among
the latter, there are many instruments that measure specific traits
individually, but far fewer if one looks for a questionnaire that
combines the traits that make up entrepreneurial personality
(Suárez-Álvarez & Pedrosa, 2016). One of the instruments that
addresses this issue, evaluating eight specific traits of entrepre-
neurial personality in a single questionnaire is the Battery for
the Assessment of the Enterprising Personality (BEPE; Cuesta
et al., 2018). The BEPE shows a good fit to a standard bifactor
model with one general factor of entrepreneurial personality
and eight uncorrelated specific dimensions (Cuesta et al.,
2018). The specific dimensions are: Autonomy, Innovation,
Achievement motivation, Internal locus of control, Self-effica-
cy, Risk-taking, Stress tolerance, and Optimism.
Autonomy refers to the motivation toward entrepreneur-
ial creation as an attempt to achieve certain individual free-
dom (Van Gelderen & Jansen, 2006). Innovation is defined
as the interest in and willingness to search for new ways of
doing things (Rauch & Frese, 2007b). Achievement
motivation is defined as the desire to achieve standards of
excellence (Suárez-Álvarez et al., 2013). Internal locus of
control refers to the causal attribution that the conse-
quences of a behavior depend on oneself (Suárez-Álvarez
et al., 2013). Self-efficacy relates to the conviction that one
can effectively organize and execute actions as well as
persist when faced with obstacles in order to achieve
*Álvaro Postigo
postigoalvaro@uniovi.es
1
Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n,
33003 Oviedo, Spain
2
Rectorate, Nebrija University, Madrid, Spain
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01685-9
/ Published online: 31 March 2021
Current Psychology (2023) 42:3160–3170
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.