ArticlePDF Available
Master Pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0039.301 1
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed
Educational Development
Mays Imad
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to reect on the pertinence and utility of
using a trauma- informed lens in educational development. A trauma-
informed approach is a framework grounded in an understanding of and
responsiveness to the impact of trauma. After I describe the primary
source of traumatic stress many faculty members are experiencing, I offer
trauma- informed suggestions for how educational developers can help
mitigate the effects of that stress. Importantly, in order to do this work of
supporting faculty effectively and sustainably, it is critical that educational
developers continue to attend to their own well- being. The overarching
theme of this article is the importance of cultivating empowering relation-
ships to help engage faculty members in supporting and improving the
design and development of inclusive and equitable student learning
experiences.
Keywords: COVID- 19, anxiety, traumatic stress, trauma- informed educa-
tional development
This being human is a guest house.
— Jalāl ad- Dīn Rūmī
When the pandemic struck and it became apparent that schools
needed to go remote, I, like many of you, was playing two roles.
First, as the coordinator of the Teaching and Learning Center at my
2 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
institution, I was supporting faculty with their teaching. While I gen-
erally focus on equitable critical pedagogy and evidence- informed
teaching and learning, I immediately changed course to accommo-
date my faculty’s urgent needs to learn the technologies necessary
to move their courses online amid increasing worry, anxiety, and the
unsettling reality. Second, as a teacher, I tried to support my students
whose lives suddenly turned upside down, not just at school but also
at home and work.
The purpose of this article is to reect on how a trauma- informed
lens can help inform our current and future work as educational devel-
opers. Below, I describe the primary source of traumatic stress many
faculty members are experiencing and offer suggestions for how we,
as educational developers, can help mitigate the effects of that stress.
I use trauma- informed principles to guide my recommendations.
Importantly, I also invite you to consider how you can help support
yourself while doing this work. The overarching theme of this article is
that a calm nervous system can help calm other people’s nervous sys-
tems. And when our nervous system is calm, we are able to engage
socially, be productive, and process new information in order to con-
tinue to learn and grow— and to feel we are living meaningful and
fullled lives.1
Emotional Contagion and Secondary Traumatic Stress
A few years ago, I walked into my physiology class ready to teach. I
greeted the students, and a student in the front row asked me, “How
are you?” I answered that I was ne. The student replied, “No, you’re
not.” And he was right. I was having a tough day. I was surprised that
my student recognized my distress because I had reminded myself to
smile right before I entered the classroom, but clearly, I could not en-
1. This theme— calming the nervous system to connect and learn— is often reinforced
by scholars of trauma- informed education. See, for example, Dr. Lori Desautels’s (2020)
work with K– 12 teachers.
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 3
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
tirely mask my stress. That encounter with my student is an example
ofemotional contagion— a subconscious automatic neural process in
which affective states are transferred among individuals (Hateld et
al., 1993). Over the years, I have become acutely aware that I can carry
my anxiety or equanimity into the classroom. It is picked up immedi-
ately by many of my students, inuencing their subsequent thoughts
and behaviors. The opposite is also true; we as faculty can be affected
by our students’ emotions.
In the early weeks of the pandemic, I was keenly aware of my stu-
dents’ struggles. Reecting on my own traumatic experiences as an
immigrant from war- torn Iraq, I decided to write a piece for educators,
“Hope Matters,” inviting them to impart optimism to their students
(Imad, 2020a). Shortly after that, I offered a series of webinars on
“Trauma- Informed Teaching & Learning” (Imad, 2020b). Based on the
attendance, it was immediately clear how much faculty across disci-
plines and institutional types were eager to learn about trauma-
informed pedagogy. My decision to write about and present webinars
on trauma- informed teaching and learning was not serendipitous
(Imad, 2020c). In fact, for years, I have struggled to understand why
higher education has not embraced the urgent need to incorporate a
trauma- informed approach to teaching and learning.2If we are honest
with ourselves, we should pause here to recognize that students were
dealing with a host of adversitiesbeforethe pandemic— from a mental
health epidemic to poverty, from drug and alcohol abuse to inequality
and racialized violence (ACHA, 2018; Auerbach et al., 2018; Broton,
2019; Broton et al., 2018; Freudenberg et al., 2019). In the wake of a
pandemic that has served to amplify these inequities and exacerbate
already existing problems, we have become substantially more aware
of students’ trauma and struggles.
During my webinars, it was evident that many faculty members
2. Due to its efcacy, “trauma- informed” approaches have been implemented in many
elds, including K– 12. For example, see Taylor et al.’s 2017 meta- study of over 97,000
K– 12 students, which found that social and emotional practices boost academic success
and reduce emotional distress in the long term. See https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.12864.
4 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
were themselves experiencing trauma and getting stuck in an orbit of
anxiety that was causing them to feel heavy hearted, drained, and
hopeless. After all, faculty members care deeply about students, work
with them closely, hear and witness their stories, and are therefore
often aware of the adversities they are facing. It was only a matter of
time before faculty would become impacted by the traumas their stu-
dents were experiencing. Secondary traumatic stress (STS)3 is a condi-
tion in which a person experiences emotional distress, exhaustion, and
burnout and displays symptoms comparable to post- traumatic stress
disorder without having had a direct traumatic experience (Ludick &
Figley, 2017; Stamm, 1999; Walker, 2019). The pandemic likely caused
many faculty members to experience traumatic stress directly, in addi-
tion to the STS they picked up from their students.
During the summer months, while supporting faculty, one question
I repeatedly asked myself was this: “How can I make the transition for
faculty easier?” I soon recognized that it was importantnot onlyto
address the technical components of teaching online and remotely
but also to be intentional and work just as hard to attempt to acknowl-
edge and address the toxic stress instructors were undergoing. Thus, I
began to employ trauma- informed strategies as part of my work with
faculty. This article will share those trauma- informed educational
development strategies after rst presenting an overview of the basics
of stress and trauma.
Why We Experience Trauma
Every aspect of our physiological state, at its basic level, is concerned
with keeping us alive. Our brain is continually scanning and sampling
its immediate environment, gaining access to fragments of the world
to make predictions related to safety or danger, reward, or punish-
3. Sometimes STS is used interchangeably with vicarious trauma— emotional impact of
exposure that therapists and counselors have from working with trauma that survivors
have endured. For more, see work by Pearlman and Mac Ian (1995).
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 5
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
ment. In a sense, our brain acts like a sophisticated statistical program
to process data and extrapolate what the greater world outside is like
(Friston, 2010). When the brain encounters any changes in the external
environment, it will ask the question, “What strategy should I select to
protect my overall well- being?” Stress arises when the brain is uncer-
tain about the answer to that question(Peters et al., 2017).
Encountering stress triggers our brain to activate its alarm system,
its ght- or- ight or freeze response, which is an automatic physiologi-
cal reaction to any perceived harmful or threatening situation. We
need this alarm system to register danger and safeguard our future
physical, mental, and social well- being. If what is causing the stress is
not resolved, our alarm system continues to be active, which costs us
energy and taxes us physiologically. Stress that leads the alarm system
to be perpetually active is not typical but “toxic,” or traumatic, stress.
With typical stress, we can replenish our energy with, for instance, a
good night’s sleep. With traumatic stress, we do not easily go back to
our resting state. Leading psychiatrist and researcher Bessel van der
Kolk states that “at the core of traumatic stress is the breakdown in the
capacity to regulate internal states,” such as fear, anger, and anxiety
(2005, p. 403). This means that we continue to spend energy trying to
reach equilibrium or homeostasis— our body’s ability to maintain phys-
iological stability.4
It is crucial to keep in mind that trauma is very much situated in the
individual experience. Trauma could be caused by a single event (e.g.,
a car accident), recurring events accumulated over a generation (e.g.,
poverty), and recurring events accumulated over generations—
intergenerational (e.g., racism) (Blair & Raver, 2016; Lehrner & Yehuda,
2018; Luby et al., 2013; Sangalang & Vang, 2016; Yehuda & Lehrner,
2018). Trauma does not have to be physically violent or overtly abu-
sive; it can be insidious. Being in combat or getting into a car accident
4. To learn more about the neurobiology of trauma, see the chapter titled “Our Brains,
Emotions, and Learning: Eight Principles of Trauma- Informed Teaching for Restorative
Justice” by Mays Imad in the forthcoming book Lessons from the Pandemic: Trauma-
Informed Approaches to College, Crisis, Change, edited by Phyllis Thompson and Jan-
ice Carello.
6 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
is traumatic, as is experiencing daily microaggressions (Nadal, 2018);
in both cases, there is a physiological impact. Sue (2010) reminds us,
“It is clear that racial, gender, and sexual- orientation microaggres-
sions, far from being benign forms of small, trivial, and innocent slights
and insults, represent major stressors for marginalized groups. . ..
Microaggressions have been found to affect the biological, emotional,
cognitive, and behavioral well- being of marginalized groups” (p. 105).
Experiencing traumatic stress impacts our biological resilience
dened as the ability to recover from the ght- or- ight state and
replenish our energy (Masten, 2001). Trauma results in an exaggerated
and prolonged stress response, which not only is energetically costly
for the body but also removes our agency and generates a sense of
helplessness that prevents us from returning to a healthy baseline
(Hanson, 2018; Levine, 1997, p. 123).5Hence, it is important to not fall
into the fallacy of “just be resilient,” because when we experience
traumatic stress, our neural networks shift and we need an interven-
tion to re- establish equilibrium.6 By intervention, I mean intentionally
using a trauma- informed approach to help individuals feel safe, con-
nected, empowered, inspired, and ready to engage, learn, and thrive.
What Triggers Our Traumatic Stress?
Much of the early research and analysis related to COVID- 19 focused
on the mode of infection and transmission, signs and symptoms, and
effects of the virus on the body. As the deaths and lockdown contin-
ued, public health experts quickly realized that the pandemic’s effect
on mental health may be even more profound (Manjoo, 2020; Sheri-
dan Rains et al., 2021; Vindegaard & Eriksen Benros, 2020). Top stress-
ors from the pandemic typically fall into one of the following three
5. To learn more about this, see work from Luthar et al. (2000), Bonanno et al. (2015),
and Cai et al. (2017).
6. See Dr. Mona Hanna- Attisha’s (2020) article on this topic, “I’m Sick of Asking Children
to Be Resilient.”
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 7
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
main categories: uncertainty, isolation, and loss of meaning (Banerjee
& Rai, 2020; Rettie & Daniels, 2020; Schnell & Krampe, 2020; Smith &
Lim, 2020; Smith et al., 2020; Tomaszek & Muchacka- Cymerman,
2020). The following is a quick summary of each:
1. Uncertainty: In 2020, we faced a host of massive COVID- 19–
related nancial, physical, and political uncertainties. In my webi-
nars during the summer and fall of 2020, I interacted with hun-
dreds of faculty from across the nation. I often asked them, “What’s
bothering you most about the current situation?” The most consis-
tent and resounding answer I got was “uncertainty.” I was not sur-
prised. Remember, whenever the brain encounters uncertainty, it
initiates a stress response, and when one has a prolonged period
of uncertainty, the continued stress response costs a great amount
of energy. From the mode of teaching to the health and vulnerabil-
ity of their family, loved ones, and themselves, the nancial stabil-
ity of their institutions, and even their own nancial and job secu-
rity, faculty members are experiencing profound and ongoing
uncertainty. And, being a contingent or adjunct instructor, the
largest and most precarious part of the professoriate on most
campuses, amplies this uncertainty.
2. Isolation: We are social creatures— we want to be with others and
be connected— yet we have been profoundly powerless to meet
those needs. Being social is a key part of our evolution, and the
trauma of social isolation is deeply rooted in our brains. Social dis-
tancing also compounds stress for those already at the margins of
isolation, such as people who live alone or people who have lost a
loved one. Isolation contributes to a person’s not being able to
afrm their view of the world— where we derive our meaning— and
that lack of conrmation leads to even more uncertainty. Many
faculty members have been working nonstop for almost a year
now and are exhausted; this combination of being both over-
worked and isolated compounds their traumatic stress.
3. Loss of meaning: The brain tries to make sense of the world
8 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
around it by searching for meaning. Meaning- making gives us a
sense of control and increases our sense of belonging, self- worth,
and personal fulllment. At the same time, it also helps us feel as
if we are a part of something bigger than ourselves. In 2020, most
people’s immediate plans were suddenly upended, and the paths
to their long- term goals were disrupted. This disruption created a
challenge to their sense of meaning— many of us lost the sense of
“why” we do what we do, and the additional absence of social
support exacerbated this loss. The sudden pivot to online instruc-
tion combined with already existing pressures and scrutiny (Mar-
cus, 2016) forced us to question the impact and relevancy of a
post- COVID- 19 higher education.
The combination and interdependence of uncertainty, isolation, and
loss of meaning created by the pandemic impacts every aspect of our
lives— the physical, the emotional, the social, and the existential. In
addition, the sudden lack of routine and physical activities, as well as a
general loss of agency, can cause us to become overwhelmed and even
paralyzed— powerful ingredients for traumatic stress. Many of our col-
leagues faced a prolonged state of stress- inducing alarm activation.
Think about what it is like to live with an alarm in your head that is always
going off warning of danger. For many people, that was their 2020
experience, which profoundly interfered with being present and making
use of the resources they have. Importantly, for many colleagues who
identify as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, that was their experi-
ence before 2020, and the pandemic has only compounded the racism,
intergenerational traumas, and ongoing oppression they experience
(DeGruy, 2018; Yehuda & Lehrner, 2018; Zambrana, 2018).
Trauma- Sensitive Educational Development
To carry out educational development work through a trauma- sensitive
lens is to recognize that our colleagues, like us, are likely to have ex-
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 9
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
perienced traumatic stress over the past months, over and above what
they may have been carrying prior to that point. A trauma- informed
approach is a framework that is grounded in an understanding of and
responsiveness to the impact of trauma. The framework is centered on
the reality that there are two preconditions for every human being to
thrive in life: feeling safe and feeling connected (Porges, 2011). As
educational developers, how can we help our colleagues feel safe and
connected? We can foster a sense of safety by reducing uncertainty
and leveraging communication. We can help our colleagues nd
meaning and community by helping them reafrm their purpose and
make intentional connections. Finally, beyond safety and connections,
we must center care and well- being at the core of our practice. The
following are ve principles of trauma- informed educational develop-
ment and strategies to accompany each.
1. Reduce uncertainty to help foster a sense of safety.
a. Help faculty identify what they can control. As stated earlier, when
we are faced with ongoing uncertainty, we feel less autonomous.
We can reduce this stress by nurturing in our faculty a sense of
control. Of course, we cannot cure all their uncertainty, but we can
help faculty focus on what they have control over. Throughout your
interactions with faculty, remind them that although they may not
be able to have control over the conditions in which they must cur-
rently teach, they typically have a great deal of control over their
course design and how they teach. They can still choose their
assignments, day- to- day activities, and how they assess their stu-
dents. For those faculty teaching at institutions where courses are
highly designed, giving faculty a little leeway to inject their own
decisions can help them identify within those structured courses
where they can have autonomy and creativity and reveal their per-
sonality. In addition, give your faculty voice and choice in their own
learning by helping them feel that they are involved in decision-
making on the CTL’s events. For example, consider offering a
10 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
weekly “open” session in which faculty decide what they want to
discuss. A key part of resolving uncertainty is to let the people we
are working with know that we support them and that we have
their backs. One way to support staff and instructors who identify
as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color is to go beyond state-
ments of solidarity and learn about the historical and current strug-
gles they face in academia and what concrete steps you can take
to advocate for their success.7
b. Carefully balance information. The brain needs information to
make sensible predictions about the world. When we are under
the inuence of traumatic stress, we can quickly feel overwhelmed
by (too much) information. It becomes increasingly difcult to
decide where we look for information and what to focus on. As
educational developers, we can lter and share a curated reposi-
tory of information related to teaching, learning, educational
scholarship, and the effective use of educational technology. Make
sure this repository is representative, focused, well indexed, acces-
sible, and easy to navigate.8
c. Balance the uncertainty of the world with predictability. Make sure
you have a clear road map for your semester’s work. Ensure that
your CTL programmatic offerings have a routine to inform faculty
about what’s going to happen each week and month and during the
course of the semester. When you plan out your events, include a
schedule showing when each event will occur and how it relates to
the rhythm of the semester. For example, 2 weeks before the semes-
ter starts, you might offer a workshop about refocusing course goals
and redesigning syllabi; at the beginning of the semester, you might
offer a session on how to create classroom community; mid-
semester, you might run a session on soliciting feedback from stu-
dents, and so on. In addition to publishing your center’s scheduled
events for the semester, create and publish your semester’s “faculty-
7. For example, see Bonner et al. (2015), Joseph et al. (2016), Santamaría and Santama-
ría (2016), and Sue (2015).
8. For more on this, see Sweller (1999).
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 11
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
to- faculty” informal check- in sessions. Be an anchor. Faculty will be
able to predict that you will be “there” every Tuesday morning, for
instance. When our brains are able to make small predictions suc-
cessfully, it creates a positive reinforcement cycle that helps faculty
feel a sense of control. You can also send weekly reminders or tips
on the same days and time, or send a monthly newsletter that fol-
lows the same format.Although this planning requires more work
for you on the front end, this early effort and structure will also
enhance your level of calm and well- being.
2. Leverage communicationto help forge trust.
a. Communicate regularly. Part of the purpose of our communications
is to (1) validate that these times are tough, (2) reassure our col-
leagues that their work matters, and (3) invite them to join us and
other colleagues in a learning community. When communicating,
keep your message targeted and concise in order to not overwhelm.
b. Remind them that their small actions can make a big difference.
For example, remind your faculty that building relationships with
their students does not have to take years, months, days, or even
hours; we can intimately connect with our students by the way we
smile during a Zoom session, the way we look at a student, or how
we simply reply to an email.
c. Communicate not just the “how” but also the “why.” Be forthright
and transparent in your communication; for example, rather than
just inviting faculty to attend an event, share with them why this
workshop matters to you and why it might matter to instructors
and their students.
3. Reaffirm or re- establish goals to create meaning.
a. Reframe obstacles to reafrm meaning and purpose. The pan-
demic challenged our sense of meaning and purpose in life, creat-
ing existential anxiety— Why does anything matter? One antidote
12 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
to this crisis in personal meaning is to view these challenges as an
opportunity to belong, to connect, and to shift our perspectives to
reframe what’s happening.For example, remind instructors that
their students need them more than ever and this is a time when
one professor can make a huge difference in a student’s life.
b. Help your faculty identify short- term goals that connect to their
long- term “why.” The brain needs a purpose to carry out a planned
action. If our long- term goals have been interrupted, we can sub-
stitute shorter- term goals. For example, at the end of each event
you host, ask your faculty to create a 1- day or 1- week concrete
goal that is achievable. Doing so tells the brain “I can accomplish
things” despite the chaos. Setting and achieving smaller goals
enhances motivation, imparts purpose, and supports self-
condence and, ultimately, long- term goals.
c. Celebrate your faculty’s work by showcasing their achievements.
For example, ask them to share what novel things they are trying
in order to better connect and engage with their students.Invite
faculty to create low- stakes 15- second “infomercials” about their
teaching that they want others to know. These could take the form
of a video, audio recording, or slideshow. Showcase their work
throughout your programming. Doing so allows for humor, playful-
ness, and direct faculty engagement.
4. Make intentional connectionsto cultivate community.
a. Connect faculty to one another. Help faculty cultivate social mind-
fulness by recognizing our interdependence. For example, desig-
nate a portion of your program to help faculty learn about one
another beyond their disciplinary work.
b. Schedule time for group freewriting. Use writing as a bridge to
connect and heal. For example, you can schedule a monthly “mus-
ings” freewriting session in which faculty ponder and share the big
questions that are important to them and record and share their
internal dialogues.
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 13
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
c. Help faculty recognize and leverage the power of relationships.
Part of your CTL’s program might be establishing a buddy system
in which colleagues can check up on and help each other feel con-
nected to something bigger than themselves. At the end of the
semester, you can invite faculty who participated in that program
to reect on how learning about others’ stories and narratives reaf-
rmed their own stories.
This trauma- informed approach to educational development does
not require us to have any training in social work or clinical psychology;
we are not diagnosing or treating our colleagues. We are revealing our
humanity to our colleagues to show them that we are on their side,
that we have their backs, that we see them, and that they matter. In
doing so, we can help our colleagues move from a disruptive present
to a future in which they are more condent and more hopeful.
Our work during this time of burnout and existential anxiety is nec-
essarily emotional. In our society in general, and in higher education in
particular, we often view emotions as the antithesis of reason. Yet the
role of emotions in the human experience, including learning and heal-
ing, is indispensable (Damasio, 2000). Through our work, we want to
recognize that while we are experiencing a host of negative emotions,
we can still leverage our positive ones. I believe that care and well-
being should be the framing principles of our work as educational
developers. The following are suggestions for how we can achieve this.
5. Center well- being and care.
a. Make “How are you?” central to your gatherings. Begin your work-
shops by asking your faculty, “How are you doing?”or “How are
things going?” For anonymity, consider using a word cloud. Invite
everyone to examine the word cloud and how it relates to their
experience. This icebreaker activity will send four important mes-
sages. The rst is that you care about the faculty’s well- being. Sec-
ond, they are not the only ones experiencing stress or negative
14 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
emotions. Third, while many people are feeling anxious and over-
whelmed, they might also be experiencing positive emotions such
as hope. Fourth, they are part of a larger community undergoing
similar experiences.
b. Provide and normalize mental breaks. Whether you are running a
workshop in person or via Zoom, encourage and give faculty the
option to take breaks. For example, during a Zoom session, when
you open the breakout rooms, designate one room as a “decom-
press room” and invite faculty who do not feel like socializing that
day to join the decompress room and turn their cameras off.9 They
will come back after the breakout portion of your event.If you are
running a longer session, build in short breaks when faculty can
turn off their cameras, stretch, or get fresh air.
c. Intentionally and explicitly engage in positive emotions such as grati-
tude. Unlike “toxic positivity,” which dismisses real concerns, grati-
tude works by acknowledging our concerns and working together to
combat our fears related to change, conict, and failure. For example,
cultivate a culture of gratitude by starting your meeting with inten-
tionally expressing your appreciation for the faculty who are present
with you and other colleagues or by inviting faculty to share three
things they feel grateful for that day in a word cloud or over chat.
I want to underscore that these ve principles are not just about
the current moment. Even before the pandemic, the changing land-
scape of higher education was a source of growing stress for many of
our colleagues, which 2020 only aggravated (Butrymowicz & D’Amato,
2020). To be able to continue to make an impact in a meaningful and
sustainable way, our work as educational developers needs to center
the overall well- being of the people we serve— both faculty and
students.
In order to be effective educational developers, we also need to
center our own well- being and care. Our own work as educational
9. Educational developer Karen Costa (2020) wrote about the trauma of watching one-
self on the screen and why it’s important to offer people choices regarding camera use.
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 15
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
developers is also rapidly changing and growing and experiencing dif-
ferent kinds of pressures. Using a trauma- informed approach to edu-
cational development, while it may be a current buzzword, is not
merely a passing fad but a necessary enduring change.
Coping Strategies for Educational Developers
Effective educational development, like teaching, recognizes and le-
verages the power of relationships to help faculty and students learn
and thrive. I began this article by discussing the two roles I was playing
when the pandemic hit the United States. There was also a third role
that for too long I had neglected— my relationship to myself and my
own well- being. Just as faculty are giving emotionally to their students,
and it takes a toll on them, educational developers are feeling the
weight of our faculty’s stress in the midst of the chaos. It is critical that
we attend to our relationships with ourselves and develop coping
strategies we can use to ensure our well- being and healing. The fol-
lowing are ten suggestions I offer for you to consider:
1. Center care and well- being. Begin with yourself. For example,
block 15 minutes each day on your calendar to read about healing
trauma or how to cope with stress.10
2. Connect with other educational developers. Join or start a learn-
ing community of educational developers. Ask for help, even if it’s
just “I need to vent” and “looking for a sounding board.”11
3. Reafrm or establish your goals.Our brains are wired for growth.
One way to promote such growth is through self- reection. Remind
yourself that the work you do will impact today and tomorrow and
have a ripple effect on the future of humanity.
10. “Stress- Proof: The Scientic Solution to Protect Your Brain and Body” by Mithu
Storoni (2017, 2019) is an excellent start if you wish to learn about coping with stress.
11. For example, since spring 2020 the POD Small Colleges & Centers Special Interest
Group (SIG) has been hosting weekly drop- in meetings in which educational developers
at smaller institutions are supporting one another.
16 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
4. Keep a gratitude journal.Begin by reecting on how your pres-
ence and existence are signicant and valued by others and the
world.Each week, write three to ve things you are grateful for. At
the end of the semester, enter your entire list into a word cloud
and reect on your gratitude journey.
5. Negotiate with your brain.Part of centering well- being is recog-
nizing when you get triggered and pausing to consider how you
will engage with the situation at hand. One question I learned to
ask myself when I am in a situation that makes me feel constricted
is, “Is this worth my cortisol?”12 For me, I began to see how the
mere act of asking that question was empowering because it
helped me know that I have a choice— to answer yes or no.
6. Treat your brain with accomplishment and creativity. Instead of
making a “to- do” list, consider making a “done” list.13 This will help
ease your anxiety about all the tasks you have yet to get to. If you
have to make a “to- do” list, include values that are important to
you. For example, show kindness, be creative, create connections.
7. Anticipate, don’t expect.We can’t predict everything, but we can
anticipate our reaction. Have a backup plan to help your brain
have the perception of control.For example, if you are going to
facilitate a workshop that involves working groups, have a backup
plan in the event that not many participants show up and you have
to forgo group work.
8. Detach from the outcome. Focus on the process more than what
will happen. The work we do is indispensable, yet it’s not going to
solve all of higher education’s problems or eradicate inequality.
When you don’t get your desired outcomes, remember what the
Persian poet Rumi says: “Keep walking” and “Let the beauty we
love be what we do.”
12. A stressful situation can trigger the stress response, which includes release of the
stress hormone cortisol. Repeated surges of cortisol is associated with both physical and
mental illness.
13. This idea was suggested to me by educational developer Dr. Gloria Niles, Director
of Distance Education & Coordinator, Ofce of Professional Development and Aca-
demic Support at the University of Hawai‘i– West O‘ahu.
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 17
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
9. Don’t take things personally. When conict arises, instead of see-
ing offenses as deliberately aimed at us, it can be helpful to ask
ourselves, “Is this person responding out of stress or desperation,
a momentary lapse in control?” Take for granted that everyone is
struggling.
10. Check up on your friends. Nurture is our nature. We feel better
when we engage in random— or intentional— acts of kind-
ness.Don’t assume others are doing great just because they are
not showing stress. We all cope differently.
As I close, I bring this conversation full circle with a poem by the
13th- century Persian poet Jalāl ad- Dīn Rūmī, called “The Guest
House”:14
This being human is a guest house.
Every morning a new arrival.
A joy, a depression, a meanness,
some momentary awareness comes
as an unexpected visitor.
Welcome and entertain them all!
Even if they’re a crowd of sorrows,
who violently sweep your house
empty of its furniture,
still, treat each guest honorably.
He may be clearing you out
for some new delight.
The dark thought, the shame, the malice,
meet them at the door laughing,
and invite them in.
14. The poem translated by Coleman Barks (1995).
18 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
Be grateful for whatever comes,
because each has been sent
as a guide from beyond.
For most of 2020, few actual visitors graced our homes as we learned
to shelter and distance. That dreadful isolation meant that, for many of
us, we received “unexpected guests” to our inner houses. And Rumi
calmly urges us to welcome and entertain them! Why? Because nega-
tive emotions serve as beacons, enabling us to march through our pain
across the bridge of hope so we and others may begin to heal.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr. Michael Reder, Director of the Joy Shechtman Mankoff
Center for Teaching & Learning at Connecticut College, for closely
reading this manuscript and making critical suggestions.
Biography
Mays Imad is a neuroscientist and Professor of Pathophysiology and
Biomedical Ethics at Pima Community College, the founding coordina-
tor of the Teaching and Learning Center, and a Gardner Institute Fel-
low. Dr. Imad’s current research focuses on stress, self- awareness, ad-
vocacy, and classroom community and how these relate to cognition,
metacognition, and, ultimately, student learning and success. Through
her teaching and research, she seeks to provide her students with
transformative opportunities that are grounded in the aesthetics of
learning, truth- seeking, justice, and self- realization.
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 19
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
References
American College Health Association. (2018). American College Health
Association– National College Health Assessment II: Reference group
executive summary. https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA-II_Spri
ng_2018_Reference_Group_Executive_Summary.pdf
Auerbach, R. P., Mortier, P., Bruffaerts, R., Alonso, J., Benjet, C., Cuijpers, P.,
Demyttenaere, K., Ebert, D. D., Green, J. G., Hasking, P., Murray, E., Nock,
M. K., Pinder- Amaker, S., Sampson, N. A., Stein, D. J., Vilagut, G., Zaslavsky,
A. M., & Kessler, R. C. (2018). WHO World Mental Health Surveys Interna-
tional College Student project: Prevalence and distribution of mental dis-
orders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(7), 623– 638. https:// doi .org
/10.1037/abn0000362
Banerjee, D., & Rai, M. (2020). Social isolation in Covid- 19: The impact of lone-
liness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(6), 525– 527. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0020764020922269
Barks, C. (1995). The essential Rumi. Castle Books.
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2016). Poverty, stress, and brain development: New
directions for prevention and intervention. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3),
S30– S36. https:// doi .org /10 .10 16 /j.ac ap .20 16 .01 .010
Bonanno, G. A., Romero, S. A., & Klein, S. I. (2015). The temporal elements of
psychological resilience: An integrative framework for the study of indi-
viduals, families, and communities. Psychological Inquiry, 26(2), 139– 169.
https:// doi .org /10 .10 80 /10 4 7 8 4 0x .20 15 .99 2677
Bonner, F. A., marbley, a. f., Tuitt, F., Robinson, P. A., Banda, R. M., & Hughes,
R. L. (Eds.). (2015). Black faculty in the academy: Narratives for negotiating
identity and achieving career success. Routledge.
Broton, K. M. (2019). A review of estimates of housing insecurity and home-
lessness among students in U.S. higher education. Journal of Social Dis-
tress and Homelessness, 29(1), 25– 38. https:// doi .org /10 .10 80 /10 5 3 0 7 89
.20 20 .16 7 7009
Broton, K. M., Weaver, K. E., & Mai, M. (2018). Hunger in higher education:
Experiences and correlates of food insecurity among Wisconsin under-
graduates from low- income families. Social Sciences, 7(10), Article 179.
https:// doi .org /10 .33 90 /so c s c i 7 1 0 0179
Butrymowicz, S., & D’Amato, P. (2020, August 4). Analysis: Hundreds of col-
leges and universities show nancial warning signs. The Hechinger Report.
https://hechingerreport.org/analysis-hundreds-of-colleges-and-universiti
es-show-nancial-warning-signs/
Cai, W., Pan, Y., Zhang, S., Wei, C., Dong, W., & Deng, G. (2017). Relationship
between cognitive emotion regulation, social support, resilience and acute
stress responses in Chinese soldiers: Exploring multiple mediation model.
20 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
Psychiatry Research, 256, 71– 78. https:// doi .org /10 .10 16 /j.ps y c h r es .20 17
.06 .018
Costa, K. (2020, May 27). Cameras be damned. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin
.com/pulse/cameras-damned-kar en -co sta/
Damasio, A. R. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the
making of consciousness. Vintage.
DeGruy, J. (2018). Post traumatic slave syndrome: America’s legacy of endur-
ing injury and healing. Joy DeGruy Publications.
Desautels, L. (2020). Weekly educator brain and body wellness practices. Rev-
elations in Education. http:// re v e l a t i o n s i n e d u c a t i on .com /re s o u r c es /te a c h i
ng-resources/weekly-educator-brain-and-body-wellness-practices/
Freudenberg, N., Goldrick- Rab, S., & Poppendieck, J. (2019). College stu-
dents and SNAP: The new face of food insecurity in the United States.
American Journal of Public Health, 109(12), 1652– 1658. https:// doi .org /10
.21 05 /aj ph .20 19 .30 5332
Friston, K. (2010). The free- energy principle: A unied brain theory? Nature
Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127– 138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
Hanna- Attisha, M. (2020, May 12). I’m sick of asking children to be resilient.
The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/opinion/sund
ay/int-inequa l i ty -ra ce -co r o n a v i r us .html
Hanson, R. (2018, March 26). Trauma and resilience: Rick Hanson and Peter
Levine [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjTwRKg
_2S8
Hateld, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Cur-
rent Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96– 100. https:// doi .org /10
.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
Imad, M. (2020a, March 17). Hope matters. Inside Higher Ed. https:// www .in s
idehighered.com/advice/2020/03/17/10-strategies-support-students-and
-help-them-learn-during-coronavirus-cr isis
Imad, M. (2020b, March 26). Trauma- informed teaching & learning [Video].
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC2n3iK0UxHm0Tdyz
mpRrEijEgvjNLVId
Imad, M. (2020c, June 3). Leveraging the neuroscience of now. Inside Higher
Ed. https://www.insi d e h i g h e r ed .com /ad v i ce /20 20 /06 /03 /se v en -re c o m m e
ndations-helping-students-thrive-times-trauma
Joseph, N. M., Haynes, C., & Cobb, F. (2016). Interrogating whiteness and
relinquishing power: White faculty’s commitment to racial consciousness in
STEM classrooms. Peter Lang.
Lehrner, A., & Yehuda, R. (2018). Cultural trauma and epigenetic inheritance.
Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1763– 1777. https://doi.org/10
.1017/s0954579418001153
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 21
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger— healing trauma: The innate capacity to
transform overwhelming experiences. North Atlantic Books.
Luby, J., Belden, A., Botteron, K., Marrus, N., Harms, M. P., Babb, C., Nishino,
T., & Barch, D. (2013). The effects of poverty on childhood brain develop-
ment. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(12), 1135– 1142. https://doi.org/10.1001/jam
apediatrics.2013.3139
Ludick, M., & Figley, C. R. (2017). Toward a mechanism for secondary trauma
induction and reduction: Reimagining a theory of secondary traumatic
stress. Traumatology, 23(1), 112– 123. https:// doi .org /10 .10 37 /tr m 0 0 0
0096
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A
critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development,
71(3), 543– 562. https://doi.org /10 .11 11 /14 67 -86 24 .00164
Manjoo, F. (2020, December 9). The hidden “fourth wave” of the pandemic.
The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/opinion/coro
navirus-mental-health.html
Marcus, J. (2016, January 22). Facing growing scrutiny, colleges set out to
prove their value. The Hechinger Report. https:// he c h i n g e r r e p o rt .org /25 3
99 -2/
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
American Psychologist, 56(3), 227– 238. https:// doi .org /10 .10 37 /00 03 -06
6x .56 .3.227
Nadal, K. L. (2018). Microaggressions and traumatic stress: Theory, research,
and clinical treatment. American Psychological Association.
Pearlman, L. A., & Mac Ian, P. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatization: An empirical
study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psy-
chology: Research and Practice, 26(6), 558– 565. https:// doi .org /10 .10 37
/07 35 -70 28 .26 .6.558
Peters, A., McEwen, B. S., & Friston, K. (2017). Uncertainty and stress: Why it
causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain. Progress in Neurobi-
ology, 156, 164– 188. https:// doi .org /10 .10 16 /j.pn e u r o b io .20 17 .05 .004
Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of
emotions, attachment, communication, and self- regulation. W. W.
Norton.
Rettie, H., & Daniels, J. (2020). Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predic-
tors and mediators of mental health during the COVID- 19 pandemic.
American Psychologist. https:// doi .org /10 .10 37 /am p 0 0 0 0710
Saakvitne, K. W. (2002). Shared trauma: The therapist’s increased vulnerability.
Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(3), 443– 449. https:// doi .org /10 .10 80 /10 4 8 1
8 8 1 2 0 9 3 4 8678
Sangalang, C. C., & Vang, C. (2016). Intergenerational trauma in refugee fami-
22 Mays Imad
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
lies: A systematic review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 19(3),
745– 754. https:// doi .org /10 .10 07 /s1 0 9 03 -016 -04 99 -7
Santamaría, L. J., & Santamaría, A. P. (2016). Culturally responsive leadership
in higher education: Promoting access, equity, and improvement.
Routledge.
Schnell, T., & Krampe, H. (2020). Meaning in life and self- control buffer stress
in times of COVID- 19: Moderating and mediating effects with regard to
mental distress. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https:// doi .org /10 .33 89 /fp s yt
.2020.582352
Sheridan Rains, L., Johnson, S., Barnett, P., Steare, T., Needle, J. J., Carr, S.,
Lever Taylor, B., Bentivegna, F., Edbrooke- Childs, J., Scott, H. R., Rees, J.,
Shah, P., Lomani, J., Chipp, B., Barber, N., Dedat, Z., Oram, S., Morant, N.,
& Simpson, A. (2021). Early impacts of the COVID- 19 pandemic on mental
health care and on people with mental health conditions: Framework syn-
thesis of international experiences and responses. Social Psychiatry and
Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56, 13– 24. https:// doi .org /10 .10 07 /s0 0 1 27 -020
-01 9 24 -7
Smith, B. J., & Lim, M. H. (2020). How the COVID- 19 pandemic is focusing
attention on loneliness and social isolation. Public Health Research & Prac-
tice, 30(2). https:// doi .org /10 .17 0 61 /ph r p 3 0 2 2008
Smith, B. M., Twohy, A. J., & Smith, G. S. (2020). Psychological inexibility and
intolerance of uncertainty moderate the relationship between social isola-
tion and mental health outcomes during COVID- 19. Journal of Contextual
Behavioral Science, 18, 162– 174. https:// doi .org /10 .10 16 /j.jc bs .20 20 .09
.005
Stamm, B. H. (1999). Secondary traumatic stress: Self- care issues for clinicians,
researchers, and educators. Sidran Press.
Storoni, M. (2017). Stress- proof: The scientic solution to protect your brain
and body— and be more resilient every day. Penguin.
Storoni, M. (2019, August 13). Why stress is dangerous— and how to avoid its
effects. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). https://www.bbc.com/fut
ure/article/20190813-burno ut -an x i e ty -st r e ss -pr o of -re lief
Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual
orientation. John Wiley & Sons.
Sue, D. W. (2015). Race talk and the conspiracy of silence: Understanding and
facilitating difcult dialogues on race. John Wiley & Sons.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Australian Council for
Educational Research.
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting
positive youth development through school- based social and emotional
learning interventions: A meta- analysis of follow- up effects. Child Devel-
opment, 88(4), 1156– 1171. https:// doi .org /10 .11 11 /cd ev .12864
Transcending Adversity: Trauma- Informed Educational Development 23
To Improve the Academy • Vol. 39, No. 3 • Spring 2021
Master Pages
Tomaszek, K., & Muchacka- Cymerman, A. (2020). Thinking about my existence
during COVID- 19, I feel anxiety and awe— the mediating role of existential
anxiety and life satisfaction on the relationship between PTSD symptoms
and post- traumatic growth. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 17(19), Article 7062. https:// doi .org /10 .33 90
/ij e r p h 1 7 1 9 7062
van der Kolk, B. A. (2005). Developmental trauma disorder: Toward a rational
diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric Annals,
35(5), 401– 408. https:// doi .org /10 .39 28 /00 4 8 5 7 13 -20 0 5 0 5 01 -06
Vindegaard, N., & Eriksen Benros, M. (2020). COVID- 19 pandemic and mental
health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain,
Behavior, and Immunity, 89, 531– 542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020
.05.048
Walker, T. (2019, October 18). “I didn’t know it had a name”: Secondary trau-
matic stress and educators. National Education Association. https:// www
.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/i-didnt-know-it-had-name
-sec o n d a ry -tr a u m a t ic -st r e ss -and
Yehuda, R., & Lehrner, A. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of trauma
effects: Putative role of epigenetic mechanisms. World Psychiatry, 17(3),
243– 257. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20568
Zambrana, R. E. (2018). Toxic ivory towers: The consequences of work stress
on underrepresented minority faculty. Rutgers University Press.
... In this chapter, we share our understanding of compassionate learning design, informed by humanising pedagogy (Pacansky-Brock, 2020) and trauma-informed approaches (Imad, 2021a(Imad, , 2021bSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014), at the intersections of equity and care (Bali & Zamora, 2022). Compassionate learning design, as we conceive it (Gachago et al., 2022), is a critical praxis that results from a desire to enhance learner participation (Fraser, 2005;Wehipeihana, 2013), and centre processes around social justice (Fraser, 2005;Tronto, 2015), while recognising the importance of care/affect ( Imad, 2021a;Noddings, 2012). ...
... In this chapter, we share our understanding of compassionate learning design, informed by humanising pedagogy (Pacansky-Brock, 2020) and trauma-informed approaches (Imad, 2021a(Imad, , 2021bSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014), at the intersections of equity and care (Bali & Zamora, 2022). Compassionate learning design, as we conceive it (Gachago et al., 2022), is a critical praxis that results from a desire to enhance learner participation (Fraser, 2005;Wehipeihana, 2013), and centre processes around social justice (Fraser, 2005;Tronto, 2015), while recognising the importance of care/affect ( Imad, 2021a;Noddings, 2012). As such, it strives towards "parity of participation" (Fraser, 2005), wherein all learners, including the most marginalised, have the opportunity to be involved in decision-making in their learning experience. ...
... Trauma-informed approaches to educational development for lecturers and student development (Imad, 2021a(Imad, , 2021b, as well as humanising approaches to teaching online (Pacansky-Brock, 2020), gained currency during the COVID-19 pandemic. We draw on these humanising approaches in different ways as part of our support work. ...
Chapter
During the pandemic, the pivot to emergency remote teaching highlighted the depth and extent of inequalities, particularly in relation to access to resources and literacies, faced by higher education institutions. Imported solutions that failed to take into consideration the constraints and cultures of local contexts were less than successful. The paucity of practitioners with blended and online learning design experience, training and education grounded in diverse contexts made local design for local contexts difficult to carry out. Although there is substantial research and guidance on online learning design, there is an opportunity to create a text deliberately oriented to practice. Further, online learning design, as a field of practice and research, is strongly shaped by research, experiences and practices from a hegemonic centre (usually in the Global North, where peripheries also exist). While many of the textbooks written from this perspective are theoretically useful as a starting point, the disjuncture between theory and practice for practitioners in less well-resourced contexts where local experiences are invisible, can be jarring. This book aims to create a space for learning designers whose voices are insufficiently heard, to share innovative designs within local constraints and, in so doing, reimagine learning design in a way that does not reproduce the binary power relations of centre and periphery.
... Across the globe educators have complained of burnout, exhaustion and lack of self-care. It has also heightened the interest in pedagogical approaches that would foreground the affective component of learning and teaching including a concern for the well-being of students and staff (Association for Learning Technology [ALT], 2021; Czerniewicz et al., 2020;Imad, 2021aImad, , 2021b. Examples of these approaches are humanising online pedagogies (Pacansky-Brock, 2020), pedagogies of care (Bali, 2020a) or trauma-informed pedagogies (Imad, 2021a;2021b), to name a few. ...
... It has also heightened the interest in pedagogical approaches that would foreground the affective component of learning and teaching including a concern for the well-being of students and staff (Association for Learning Technology [ALT], 2021; Czerniewicz et al., 2020;Imad, 2021aImad, , 2021b. Examples of these approaches are humanising online pedagogies (Pacansky-Brock, 2020), pedagogies of care (Bali, 2020a) or trauma-informed pedagogies (Imad, 2021a;2021b), to name a few. These approaches are not new but have received increased attention over the last few years. ...
... The belief that learning is relational, that it happens in community, foregrounds the role of emotions in learning. Traumainformed pedagogies as developed by educators such as Mays Imad (2021aImad ( , 2021b suggest that learning cannot happen when learners (and educators) are dealing with trauma. Based on studies in the field of neuroscience, she argues that emotions are key to learning. ...
Chapter
During the pandemic, the pivot to emergency remote teaching highlighted the depth and extent of inequalities, particularly in relation to access to resources and literacies, faced by higher education institutions. Imported solutions that failed to take into consideration the constraints and cultures of local contexts were less than successful. The paucity of practitioners with blended and online learning design experience, training and education grounded in diverse contexts made local design for local contexts difficult to carry out. Although there is substantial research and guidance on online learning design, there is an opportunity to create a text deliberately oriented to practice. Further, online learning design, as a field of practice and research, is strongly shaped by research, experiences and practices from a hegemonic centre (usually in the Global North, where peripheries also exist). While many of the textbooks written from this perspective are theoretically useful as a starting point, the disjuncture between theory and practice for practitioners in less well-resourced contexts where local experiences are invisible, can be jarring. This book aims to create a space for learning designers whose voices are insufficiently heard, to share innovative designs within local constraints and, in so doing, reimagine learning design in a way that does not reproduce the binary power relations of centre and periphery.
... Since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and instances of civil and social unrest since March 2020, educational developers (Costa, n.d.;Imad, 2021) and faculty members alike (Carello & Thompson, 2021) have begun to address the need to develop trauma-informed approaches for teaching and learning. While Carello and Thompson (2021) compiled stories of how faculty members addressed teaching and learning in ways that centered and supported students' traumatic experiences and inequities at the hands of the massive pivot to online learning, Imad (2021) provides guidance for educational developers who are seeking approaches to teaching and learning that recognize the impact of trauma on learning. ...
... Since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and instances of civil and social unrest since March 2020, educational developers (Costa, n.d.;Imad, 2021) and faculty members alike (Carello & Thompson, 2021) have begun to address the need to develop trauma-informed approaches for teaching and learning. While Carello and Thompson (2021) compiled stories of how faculty members addressed teaching and learning in ways that centered and supported students' traumatic experiences and inequities at the hands of the massive pivot to online learning, Imad (2021) provides guidance for educational developers who are seeking approaches to teaching and learning that recognize the impact of trauma on learning. Costa (n.d.), additionally, provides a set of guidelines and approaches for faculty to consider as they recognize the role of traumatic experiences on emotional regulation and relationships in the classroom. ...
... From a trauma-inclusive lens, an instructor may be more likely to check in on a student scrolling through their phone in the back of the classroom (potentially dissociating) instead of writing them off as lazy or disengaged. However, to date, little research exists that provides empirical evidence of the impact of trauma-inclusive practices on student success, with existing scholarship framing the topic from a conceptual lens (Costa, n.d.;Daniels, 2022;Imad, 2021). Below, we present a framework for trauma-inclusive pedagogy in higher education that we use to test the efficacy of trauma-informed practices on student success, particularly for students exposed to one or more traumatic life events. ...
Article
Full-text available
While trauma-inclusive approaches to student learning have been well documented in K–12 contexts, postsecondary education has done little to incorporate trauma-inclusive pedagogy into college classrooms. Using a sample (n = 529) of graduate and undergraduate students at a public rural-serving regional serving university, this study aims to explore differences in students’ perception of academic success in courses where trauma-inclusive practices were used and courses where these practices were not. Findings provide evidence that students felt more successful in courses where trauma-inclusive practices were used. Additionally, researchers were able to demonstrate that differences in perceptions of success were more pronounced between students who have been exposed to traumatic life experiences, particularly in the course where participants felt the least successful. Implications for future research, practice, and models of educational development are discussed.
... The leaders of the CoP did not facilitate the group using empirically researched practices for team management (Bang & Midelfart, 2017;Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006) or community-building research (Wenger, 1998;Wenger et al., 2002). Instead, their leadership styles were grounded in traumainformed (Imad, 2021) and anti-oppression/liberation principles (e.g., Freire, 1968Freire, /2000hooks, 1994). Their interpretations of these philosophical principles resulted in the following practices to ensure that members felt: ...
... Members support one another's growth and individuality with affective/emotional labor as they contribute to the group's collective practice, similar to the work in ED/client relationships (Bessette & McGowan, 2020;Chen et al., 2022;Imad, 2021). We noticed this interaction and benefit in our community-through-teamwork theme, which was uniquely associated with across-institutional responses. ...
Article
Full-text available
We share insights from a mixed methods study to describe the experience of educational developers participating in a community of practice (CoP). This CoP consisted of 19 leaders at eight institutions, serving collectively as facilitators of a hybrid, across-institutional, seven-week workshop series on course design for graduate students and postdoctoral scholars. From results of a survey examining the functional and sustaining features of the community, we illustrate that members experience the community aspect of our CoP primarily as a sense of satisfaction/personal fulfillment and, to an extent, in the effectiveness/productiveness of collaborations between members. Members of our CoP experience several community-related benefits specific to their across-institution collaborations. We demonstrate the importance of members’ sense of belonging, overall professional development, and well-being for sustaining our CoP.
... From a salutogenic perspective, implementing UDL not only removes barriers but also contributes to restoring well-being after traumatic experiences, in terms of post-traumatic growth (Mays, 2021). During the implementation of UDL practices, teachers chose those that aligned with the learning objectives and students' needs and could improve the results of the SoC questionnaire. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study investigates the effectiveness of using the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach as a trauma-sensitive pedagogy strategy in higher education. By integrating the concepts of UDL and Salutogenesis, we aimed to develop a tool that promotes healthy learning, problem-solving, and motivation among students. Salutogenesis emphasizes the development of a Sense of Coherence (SoC), which serves as a tool for stress resilience and restoration. To assess the impact of UDL practices on SoC levels, we administered a Sense of Coherence-13 questionnaire before and after implementing UDL practices in English language classes at a polytechnic university. All the students in the study had experienced traumatic events caused by the current crisis in Ukraine. The study focused on demonstrating that UDL practices can serve as a restorative and inclusive tool. The results indicate that the application of UDL practices led to an increase in SoC levels, demonstrating their potential for promoting restoration. Additionally, teacher interviews were conducted to identify the challenges and benefits of implementing UDL practices.
... Such an approach is aligned with the recent call for universities to give greater attention to creating a culture of health equity and food security on college campuses [86]. Given the compounding and overlapping impacts of food insecurity and far-reaching events, such as the pandemic, efforts to address food insecurity would be best framed within the context of a trauma-informed approach [87,88]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, many students have faced economic hardship and experienced food insecurity, even as universities strive to create more equitable pathways to college. There is a need for a more holistic perspective that addresses the complexity of food insecurity amongst college students. To this end, we examined the relationship between the social determinants of health, including college food insecurity (CoFI) and childhood food insecurity (ChFI), and their relationship with well-being measures. The study sample was a convenience sample that included 372 students at a public university who responded to an online survey in fall 2021. Students were asked to report their food security status in the previous 30 days. We used the following analytical strategies: chi-square tests to determine differences between food secure (FS) and food insecure (FI) students; binary logistic regression of CoFI on student demographics and ChFI; and ordinal or binary logistic regression for well-being measures. Black students, off-campus students, first-generation students, in-state students, and humanities/behavioral/social/health sciences majors were more likely to report CoFI. FI students were more likely to have experienced ChFI and to have lower scores on all well-being measures. ChFI was associated with four well-being measures and its effects were mediated by CoFI. College student health initiatives would benefit from accounting for SDOH, including ChFI experiences and its subsequent cumulative disadvantages experienced during college.
Article
Dystopian literature authored by Arab novelists serves as a reflective medium that elucidates the traumatic experiences endured by individuals in the Arab world amidst on-going crises and conflicts. This article employs trauma theory to explore the complexities of establishing a dystopian text showing how trauma manifests within the unconscious layers of the human psyche, thus leaving an indelible scar that persists over time. The article argues that the events associated with such traumatic experiences emerge into the realm of reality through literary texts, a process that not only allows for the articulation of hidden traumas but also provides the writer with a means to alleviate personal dilemmas through the act of writing. By briefly analysing a selection of prominent and translated Arabic dystopian works, this article examines how certain narratives encapsulate experiences of trauma resulting from oppression and societal upheaval and explores how these texts present harsh realities while engaging readers and fostering resistance against personal adversities. The depicting of dystopian themes and characters in these texts enables readers to understand genuine traumas that bridge the gap between imaginative constructs and lived realities. In conclusion, the article asserts that Arabic dystopian literature acts as a mirror that reflects the injustices and oppression faced by Arabs under authoritarian regimes and the legacies of former colonial powers.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The global outbreak of COVID-19set new challenges and threats for every human being. In the psychological field it is similar to deep existential crises or a traumatic experience that may lead to the appearance or exacerbation of a serious mental disorder and loss of life meaning and satisfaction. Courtney et al. (2020) discussed deadly pandemic COVID-19 in the light of TMT theory and named it as global contagion of mortality that personally affected every human being. Such unique conditions activate existential fears as people start to be aware of their own mortality. Objective: The main aim of this study was to test the mediating effect of existential anxiety, activated by COVID-19 and life satisfaction (SWLS) on the relationship between PTSD symptoms and post-traumatic growth (PTG). We also examined the moderated mediating effect of severity of trauma symptoms on life satisfaction and existential anxiety and its associations with PTG. Method: We conducted an online survey during the peak of the COVID-19 outbreak in Poland. The participants completed existential anxiety scale (SNE), life satisfaction scale (SWLS), IES-R scale for measuring the level of PTSD symptoms and post-traumatic growth inventory (PTGI). Results: The effect of PTSD on PTG was found to be mediated by existential anxiety and life satisfaction. We also confirmed two indirect effects: (1) the indirect effect of PTSD on PTG via existential anxiety and life satisfaction tested simultaneously; (2) the indirect effect of life satisfaction on PTG through severity of trauma symptoms. An intermediate or high level of PTSD level was related to less PTG when low and full PTSD stress symptoms strengthened PTG experiences. Conclusions: A therapeutic intervention for individuals after traumatic experience should attempt to include fundamental existential questions and meaning of life as well as the severity of PTSD symptoms. The severity of traumatic sensations may affect the relationship between life satisfaction and post-traumatic growth.
Article
Full-text available
Background As evidenced by several studies, mental distress increased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this period, citizens were asked to exercise a high degree of self-control with regard to personal and social health behavior. At the same time, we witnessed an increase of prosocial acts and shared creative expressions, which are known to serve as sources of meaning. Meaning in life and self-control are acknowledged psychological resources. Especially in times of crisis, meaning in life has been shown to be a crucial factor for resilience and coping. However, threatening and stressful situations can also jeopardize existential security and trigger crises of meaning. The present study aimed to document levels of acute COVID-19 stress and general mental distress in Germany and Austria during the lockdown and in the weeks thereafter. In order to identify potential risk factors related to demographics and living conditions, their associations with COVID-19 stress were analyzed exploratively. The primary objective of the study, however, was to investigate the buffering effect of two psychological resources—meaningfulness and self-control—with regard to the relation between acute COVID-19 stress and general mental distress. Finally, a potential aggravation of mental distress due to the occurrence of crises of meaning was examined. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted online during lockdown (survey group 1) and the subsequent weeks characterized by eased restrictions (survey group 2). A total of N = 1,538 German-speaking participants completed a questionnaire battery including a novel measure of acute COVID-19 stress, meaningfulness and crisis of meaning (SoMe), self-control (SCS-KD), and a screening of general mental distress, measured by core symptoms of depression and anxiety (PHQ-4). In a first step, associations between living conditions, demographics, and COVID-19 stress were explored. Second, a moderation and a mediation model were tested. Meaningfulness, a measure of presence of meaning in life, as well as self-control were proposed to serve as buffers in a time of crisis, thus moderating the relation between acute COVID-19 stress and general mental distress (double moderation). Crisis of meaning, operationalizing an experienced lack of meaning in life, was proposed to mediate the relationship between acute COVID-19 stress and general mental distress, with an assumed moderation of the association between COVID-19 stress and crisis of meaning by survey group (lockdown versus eased restrictions after lockdown), and a hypothesized moderation of the link between crisis of meaning and general mental distress by self-control (dual moderated mediation). Results COVID-19 stress was slightly right-skewed. Scores were higher during lockdown than in the weeks thereafter. The rate of clinically significant general mental distress was high, exceeding prevalence rates from both the general population and clinical samples of the time before the pandemic. In the weeks following the lockdown (group 2), general mental distress and crisis of meaning were significantly higher than during lockdown (group 1), whereas meaningfulness and self-control were significantly lower. Demographically, age had the strongest association with COVID-19 stress, with older participants perceiving less acute stress (r = −.21). People who were partnered or married suffered less from COVID-19 stress (η2 = .01). Living alone (η2 = .006), living in a room versus a flat or house (η2 = .008), and being unemployed due to the pandemic (η2 = .008) were related to higher experience of COVID-19 stress. COVID-19 stress and general mental distress were strongly related (r = .53). Both meaningfulness and self-control were negatively associated with general mental distress (r = −.40 and −.36, respectively). They also moderated the relationship between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: When meaningfulness was high, high COVID-19 stress was related to substantially lower PHQ-4 scores than when meaningfulness was low. The same held for self-control: High scores of self-control were associated with lower PHQ-4 scores especially when COVID-19 stress was high. Crisis of meaning mediated the relationship between COVID-19 stress and PHQ-4. There was a higher likelihood of crises of meaning occurring when COVID-19 stress was high; crisis of meaning, in turn, was associated with general mental distress. Survey group moderated the first path of this mediation, i.e., the relationship between COVID-19 stress and crisis of meaning: High scores of COVID-19 stress were associated more strongly with crisis of meaning in the second survey group (after the lockdown). Self-control moderated the second path, i.e., the relationship between crisis of meaning and PHQ-4: When a crisis of meaning was present, self-control could buffer its effect on general mental distress. Conclusions Also in the present study among German-speaking participants, general mental distress was high. Scores were higher after than during the lockdown, indicating an ongoing destabilization for a significant part of the population. People who saw a meaning in their lives and who were capable of self-control reported substantially less mental distress. Meaningfulness and self-control also served as buffers between COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: When COVID-19 stress was high, the presence of meaningfulness and self-control accounted for lower general mental distress. Moreover, people who suffered strongly from COVID-19 stress were more likely to develop a crisis of meaning which, in turn, was associated with higher general mental distress. This suggests that ongoing anxiety and depression might (also) be based on existential struggles. Again here, self-control buffered the impact of crisis of meaning on general mental health. We conclude from these findings that public health policies can support citizens in coping with large-scale crises by enabling experiences of meaningfulness, e.g., through transparent and reliable modes of communicating goals and necessary intermediate steps. Moreover, health professionals are well advised to invite individuals to confront existential questions and struggles, and to encourage them to exercise self-control. The latter can be boosted by keeping higher-order goals salient—which again is inherently linked to an understanding of their meaning.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on human activity worldwide, in part due to many governments issuing stay-at-home orders and limiting the types of social interactions in which citizens can engage. Previous research has shown that social isolation can contribute to psychological distress. The impact of increased social isolation on mental health functioning during the COVID-19 crisis, as well as potential mechanisms to buffer this impact, have yet to be investigated. The current study explored the moderating role of psychological flexibility and related constructs on the relationships between social isolation and mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cross-sectional data from 278 participants, the majority residing in the United States, were collected during a 3-week period from mid-April to early May, 2020 via online survey. A series of hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated statistically significant relationships between social isolation and psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress), well-being, and valued living. Psychological inflexibility, intolerance of uncertainty, and emotional suppression significantly moderated these relationships in a number of instances. Greater psychological flexibility and acceptance of difficult experiences appeared to act as a buffer against the negative effects of increased social isolation, while amplifying the benefits of social connectedness. Implications for promoting mental health and buffering against the harmful effects of social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has many potential impacts on people with mental health conditions and on mental health care, including direct consequences of infection, effects of infection control measures and subsequent societal changes. We aimed to map early impacts of the pandemic on people with pre-existing mental health conditions and services they use, and to identify individual and service-level strategies adopted to manage these.Methods We searched for relevant material in the public domain published before 30 April 2020, including papers in scientific and professional journals, published first person accounts, media articles, and publications by governments, charities and professional associations. Search languages were English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese. Relevant content was retrieved and summarised via a rapid qualitative framework synthesis approach.ResultsWe found 872 eligible sources from 28 countries. Most documented observations and experiences rather than reporting research data. We found many reports of deteriorations in symptoms, and of impacts of loneliness and social isolation and of lack of access to services and resources, but sometimes also of resilience, effective self-management and peer support. Immediate service challenges related to controlling infection, especially in inpatient and residential settings, and establishing remote working, especially in the community. We summarise reports of swiftly implemented adaptations and innovations, but also of pressing ethical challenges and concerns for the future.Conclusion Our analysis captures the range of stakeholder perspectives and experiences publicly reported in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in several countries. We identify potential foci for service planning and research.
Article
Full-text available
The current pandemic wave of COVID-19 has resulted in significant uncertainty for the general public. Mental health and examining factors that may influence distress have been outlined as key research priorities to inform interventions. This research sought to examine whether intolerance of uncertainty and coping responses influence the degree of distress experienced by the U.K. general public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a cross-sectional online questionnaire design, participants were recruited (N = 842) using snowball sampling over a 10-day period in the early “lockdown” phase of the pandemic. Around a quarter of participants demonstrated significantly elevated anxiety and depression, with 14.8% reaching clinical cutoff for health anxiety. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance indicated those in “vulnerable” groups were significantly more anxious (p < .001), and also more anxious in relation to their health (p < .001). Mediation modeling demonstrated maladaptive coping responses partially mediated the predictive relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and psychological distress. Mental health difficulties have become significantly raised during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, particularly for the vulnerable. Findings support emerging research suggesting the general public is struggling with uncertainty, more so than normal. Vulnerable groups are more anxious about their health, but not more intolerant of uncertainty than the nonvulnerable. Finally, this study indicated two modifiable factors that could act as treatment targets when adapting interventions for mental health during the COVID-19 global health crisis.
Article
Full-text available
The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic upon human health, economic activity and social engagement have been swift and far reaching. Emerging evidence shows that the pandemic has had dramatic mental health impacts, bringing about increased anxiety and greater social isolation due to the physical distancing policies introduced to control the disease. In this context, it is possible to more deeply appreciate the health consequences of loneliness and social isolation, which researchers have argued are enduring experiences for many people and under-recognised contributors to public health. In this paper, we examine the social and psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on what this has revealed about the need to better understand and respond to social isolation and loneliness as public health priorities. Social isolation and loneliness are understood to be distinct conditions, yet each has been found to predict premature mortality, depression, cardiovascular disease and cognitive decline. Estimates of the prevalence and distribution of social isolation and loneliness vary, possibly ranging from one-in-six to one-in-four people, and the lack of knowledge about the extent of these conditions indicates the need for population monitoring using standardised methods and validated measures. Reviews of the evidence relating to social isolation and loneliness interventions have found that befriending schemes, individual and group therapies, various shared activity programs, social prescription by healthcare providers, and diverse strategies using information and communication technologies have been tried. There remains uncertainty about what is effective for different population groups, particularly for prevention and for addressing the more complex condition of loneliness. In Australia, a national coalition – Ending Loneliness Together – has been established to bring together researchers and service providers to facilitate evidence gathering and the mobilisation of knowledge into practice. Research–practice partnerships and cross-disciplinary collaborations of this sort are essential for overcoming the public health problems of loneliness and social isolation that have pre-existed and will endure beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Over the last decade, multiple studies of food insecurity among college students have found rates from 20% to more than 50%, considerably higher than the 12% rate for the entire US population. Reasons for higher rates of food insecurity among college students include a growing population of low-income college students, high college costs and insufficient financial aid, more financial hardship among many low- and moderate-income families, a weak labor market for part-time workers, declining per capita college resources, and Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) policies that specifically exclude many college students from participation. This essay reviews the causes and consequences of food insecurity on campus, explores reasons for the low SNAP participation rate, and describes how campuses have responded to food insecurity. It summarizes federal, state, and local changes in SNAP policies that can facilitate college student participation and retention and suggests strategies for more robust and effective university responses to food insecurity, including SNAP enrollment campaigns, a stronger role for campus food services, and a redefinition of the goals and purposes of campus food pantries.
Article
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic general medical complications have received the most attention, whereas only few studies address the potential direct effect on mental health of SARS-CoV-2 and the neurotropic potential. Furthermore, the indirect effects of the pandemic on general mental health are of increasing concern, particularly since the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic (2002-2003) was associated with psychiatric complications. Methods We systematically searched the database Pubmed including studies measuring psychiatric symptoms or morbidities associated with COVID-19 among infected patients and among none infected groups the latter divided in psychiatric patients, health care workers and non-health care workers. Results A total of 43 studies were included. Out of these, only two studies evaluated patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, whereas 41 evaluated the indirect effect of the pandemic (2 on patients with preexisting psychiatric disorders, 20 on medical health care workers, and 19 on the general public). 18 of the studies were case-control studies/compared to norm, while 25 of the studies had no control groups. The two studies investigating COVID-19 patients found a high level of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) (96.2%) and significantly higher level of depressive symptoms (p=0.016). Patients with preexisting psychiatric disorders reported worsening of psychiatric symptoms. Studies investigating health care workers found increased depression/depressive symptoms, anxiety, psychological distress and poor sleep quality. Studies of the general public revealed lower psychological well-being and higher scores of anxiety and depression compared to before COVID-19, while no difference when comparing these symptoms in the initial phase of the outbreak to four weeks later. A variety of factors were associated with higher risk of psychiatric symptoms and/or low psychological well-being including female gender, poor-self-related health and relatives with COVID-19. Conclusion Research evaluating the direct neuropsychiatric consequences and the indirect effects on mental health is highly needed to improve treatment, mental health care planning and for preventive measures during potential subsequent pandemics.