Deadnaming as disformative utterance: the redefinition of trans womanhood on Urban Dictionary

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.


‘Deadnaming’ is the act of referring to trans people by the names assigned to them in infancy in cases where they have rejected those names. In this paper, Judith Butler’s (1997) theorising of injurious speech is united with Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall’s (2005) tactics of intersubjective identity formation to conceptualise deadnaming as a speech act with a harmful perlocutionary force, which may be employed to denaturalise or illegitimate a trans person’s acts of self-determination. This is demonstrated by an analysis of entries on the crowdsourced website Urban Dictionary that were posted in response to American celebrity Caitlyn Jenner’s public coming out as a trans woman in 2015. Attempts by Urban Dictionary’s users to ‘redefine’ Jenner’s names both reveal the cisnormative assumptions that motivate deliberate acts of deadnaming and expose anxieties about how the public visibility of trans people threatens the alleged naturalness of those assumptions.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... For example, at no point is there a reference to her "dead name." Deadnaming refers to the act of speaking about trans people by the names assigned to them in infancy when they have rejected those names (Turton, 2021). Referring to the "dead name" may lead to the denaturalization or delegitimization of the self-determination acts of the trans person. ...
Full-text available
Recent anti-LGBTQ+ discourse has increased the threat of violence against people who do not follow the cisheteronorma-tive mandates. To face these dialectics, the media can offer alternative discourses, in particular by providing realistic and non-stereotyped LGBTQ+ representations. Media portrayals can be seen as both positive and negative. On one hand, they may offer stereotypical and narrow representations, but on the other, they can include representations that can become aspirational models and improve visibility. The objective of this article is to explore this second perspective by analyzing the representation of Jules, a trans female character from the American series Euphoria (Levinson et al., 2019-present). To this end, we conducted a close reading analysis (Castelló, 2008) of the first season of the series. The results show three axes of representation that move away from the traditional portrayal of trans characters: (a) a narrative that moves beyond the "trans fact" and presents complex and plural stories, (b) a representation of the trans individual as an element of value and love, away from fetishism, and (c) a link between the trans realm and specific spaces of comfort and freedom.
Feminist and postcolonial scholars have long contended that dictionaries, far from being objective linguistic records, are ideologically loaded texts that overtly or covertly encode sexist and ethnocentric attitudes (e.g. Rose 1979; Benson 2001). Queer linguists have also begun to explore how dictionaries reproduce heteronormativity and cisnormativity (Nossem 2018; Turton 2020), though much of this scholarship has so far limited itself to the construction of identity. This paper instead contributes to the recent queer turn towards embodiment by exploring representations of sexual acts in online general English dictionaries. It encourages greater engagement between queer lexicography and other strands of dictionary criticism by placing Rubin’s (1984) concept of the ‘charmed circle’ of sex in dialogue with Benson’s (2001) postcolonial model of the centre/periphery in lexicography. The paper argues that heteronormativity, cisnormativity and phallocentrism continue to shape contemporary definitions of sex and sexual intercourse by sidelining or silencing queer erotic acts and bodies.
This chapter examines chart documentation regarding 16 trans and non-binary patients on inpatient units in a psychiatric hospital in Ontario. An analysis of these charts shows that cisnormativity governed institutional means of collecting data regarding patient demographics, such as the inconsistent use of correct pronouns, names, and gender identities, which in turn facilitated basic problems in recognizing the humanity of trans and non-binary people. Practitioners employed a cisnormative, transmisogynist lens in their descriptions of patients’ appearance and mannerisms, resulting in the pathologizing of trans and non-binary gender expression, especially trans femininities. Practitioners also displayed a significant lack of knowledge about trans and non-binary life, which resulted in the individualizing of structural inequities and the pathologizing of trans and non-binary experiences of marginalization and violence. This chapter further demonstrates that advocating for more access to mental health treatment will not serve emancipatory aims when treatment continues to reinforce cisnormative, damaging assumptions about trans and non-binary life, identities, and ways of being.
Trans and other nonnormatively gendered subjectivities served a foundational role in queer linguistics, but it is only recently that a wave of trans researchers have begun to carve out distinctively trans approaches to the study of language. This commentary explores the question of why this shift has taken so long and how certain disciplinary norms have made linguistics a less-than-attractive home for trans scholars, namely an apoliticised ideology of descriptivism, the flippant indulgence of linguistic curiosity and claims to linguistic authority. Importantly, these processes are vulnerable to furthering not only transphobia but also racism, colonialism, ableism and linguistic subjugation. These convergences present opportunities for coalition-based responses to the maintenance of social hierarchies in linguistics and allied disciplines, and underscore the importance of community-based approaches to research on language and gender alterity.
This study contributes to the emerging literature on gender identity and pronoun use by exploring strategies to refer to unknown human referents. In an online survey involving mainly a university population aged 29 and below, participants were first asked to pick a potential roommate from two fictional characters with gender-ambiguous names and write short answers explaining their choice. Secondly, participants were explicitly asked what pronoun they would use to refer to an unknown human referent from a list of neopronouns in addition to singular they. The results show a strong association between participants’ self-identified gender and the gendered pronoun used. The results also show singular they is the most popular gender-inclusive pronoun for an unknown individual while pronoun avoidance strategies include repeating names and using generic nouns. Additionally, the reflexive form themself is preferred over themselves for unknown human referents, in contrast to previous research showing almost the same rate of naturalness for themselves and themself in the specific-reference context.
This paper furthers the goal of “queering lexicography” ( Nossem 2018 ) by proposing a theoretical approach to analysing dictionary definitions that replaces the traditional descriptive/prescriptive binary with a model of normativity influenced by performativity theory. This is demonstrated by a critical discourse analysis of how entries for lesbian, gay , and homosexual in four contemporary English dictionaries tacitly position homosexual as a neutral term against which lesbian and gay are sociolinguistically marked. The paper also stresses the need for researchers not only to analyse how normativity is embedded in dictionaries, but to recognize the extent to which lay dictionary-users are already aware of the normative potential of lexicography, whether they embrace it or condemn it. This is explored through an incident in which Merriam-Webster’s addition of the word genderqueer to its online dictionary in 2016 became the subject of public scrutiny and contestation on social media.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.