ChapterPDF Available

2020 (Gil J. Stein) “Leadership Strategies and the Multi-linear Development of Social Complexity in Ubaid Mesopotamia and Susa A Southwestern Iran (5500-4000 BCE)” pp 173-187 In Balossi Restelli, F, Cardarelli, A, Di Nocera, G.M., Manzanilla, L, Mori, L, Palumbi, G, Pittman, H. (eds.), Pathways through Arslantepe. Essays in Honour of Marcella Frangipane. Università di Roma La Sapienza and Sette Città, Viterbo.

Authors:
Pathways through Arslantepe
Essays in Honour of Marcella Frangipane
Francesca Balossi Restelli, Andrea Cardarelli,
Gian Maria Di Nocera, Linda Manzanilla, Lucia Mori,
Giulio Palumbi, Holly Pittman (eds.)
SAPIENZA UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA
2020
e volume has been published with the support and contributions of the Dipartimento di Scienze
dell’Antichità della Sapienza Università di Roma, of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and of
Holly Pittman.
Copyright @ Università Sapienza di Roma and Edizioni Sette Città
Impaginazione e grafica
a cura di: Fabiana Ceccariglia
Copertina: Tiziana D’Este
Illustrazioni delle sezioni interne: Tiziana D’Este, da foto di Mauro Benedetti, Filiberto Scarpelli,
Alice Siracusano, Roberto Ceccacci, Tiziana D’Este
ISBN: 978-88-7853-874-0
ISBN ebook: 978-88-7853-875-7
Edizioni Sette Città
via Mazzini 87
01100 Viterbo
info@settecitta.eu
www.settecitta.eu
Copertina: elaborazione grafica di Tiziana D’Este tratta dai dipinti parietali di Arslantepe
Finito di stampare nel mese di agosto 2020
I
E G
Premessa pag. 
G P
Presentazione 
M Ö
Introduction 
M Ö
GİrİŞ 
F B R, A C, G M D N,
L M, L M, G P, H P
Editors’ preface 
F B R, A C, G M D N,
L M, L M, G P, H P
Prefazione dei curatori 
Bibliography of Marcella Frangipane 
Tabula Gratulatoria 
EQUALITY AND INEQUALITY IN SOCIAL SYSTEMS
J B
e analysis of the settling modes to trace the social organisation of the Predynastic Lower
Egyptian sites: the example of Maadi 
A C
e horizontal and vertical egalitarian systems in the vision of Marcella Frangipane: a
comparison with the Terramare society of the Po valley (Italy) 
A C, G R
e origin of inequality in central and southern Italy during the Copper Age 
A M C, C P, P P
Dierences in archaeological sources on early metallurgy between cemeteries and settlements
in northern Latium 
H Ç A
Late Chalcolithic Anatolian fruit-stands: signicance, function and cultural interactions 
C G, G P
Feasting the collapse. Ceremonial buildings at the beginning of the Early Bronze Age between
highlands and lowlands: Some considerations 
B H
Late 4th millennium BCE infant burials from Oylum Höyük, Eastern Step Trench 
N L
Tracing inequality: a reection on ‘royal tombs’ in eastern Anatolia at the beginning of the
third millennium BC 
R Ö
Trajectories of complexity in the h millennium: A comparative approach 
H P
Diversity in Late Chalcolithic 4 glyptic imagery: What did it mean? 
M R
Approaches to the nature of the Kura-Araxes societies in their homeland 
G J. S
Leadership strategies and the multi-linear development of social complexity in Ubaid
Mesopotamia and Susa A southwestern Iran (5500-4000 BCE) 
ECONOMY, PRODUCTION AND POWER
L B
On the Neolithic equids of Umm Dabaghiyah, Iraq 
M C S
Redistribution, central storage and social consumption in south eastern Italy during the nal
Bronze Age 
P Ç, I D, S G
Storage facilities during the Middle and Late Chalcolithic periods at Güvercinkayası 
M B DA
Une liaison dangereuse: mass-produced bowls and cretulae at Arslantepe during period VI A 
C L, D Z
e Chalcolithic technologies in Anatolia: a review of the studies on chipped stones 
C M
Pathways to social complexity in the Highlands: on the relationships between the Light-Ware
and the Black-Ware craing communities in the Caucasus and beyond (c. 4300-2800 BCE) 
A M, L S, C V
Food production at Arslantepe (Turkey): botanical evidences from kitchens of the late
Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age 
C S, B S
Observations concerning pottery trays in the Caucasus during the Chalcolithic and Early
Bronze Ages 
K. A Y, M A
A Mitannian Period mold from Alalakh: digging below the oor of Idrimis level IV palace 
ADMINISTRATION AND BUREAUCRACY
E C
Stamp seals of the local Late Chalcolithic from the Kahramanmaraş Region 
R L
Clay sealings from Telloh: new evidence from a 3rd millennium BC corpus 
S M
Gable seals from Tell As: a group of Chalcolithic stamps across Syria and Anatolia 
A MM
Experiments in recording practices in 4th millennium BC Northern Mesopotamia 
A M
Administrative practices in the Syrian Jezirah: sealings from Jebel Aruda 
C M
Use (and non-use) of seals in Neo-Hittite Anatolia 
L M
“Kunuk aḫḫī” the “seal of the brothers”: notes on the use of a collective seal at Ekalte during
the Late Bronze Age 
S P, R B, C K
Seals and sealings from Dehsavar 
ORIGIN OF STATE
P B
A tale of three cities, about proto-urban centers and their organization 
M C
Tracing a model of proto-urbanization in Northern Aegean and Western Anatolia in the late
4th millennium 
M Ö
1964 excavations at Söğüt Tarlası and the reminiscences of an Uruk related assemblage 
H S, M B, İ A
Between the plains and the mountains: a brief look at upper Tigris region in the Post-Uruk
period according to data from Başur Höyük 
RESTORATION, MANAGEMENT AND EXHIBIT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
R B, L G
Restoration at Arslantepe: a balance between quality and compromise 
Z E, K. K E
Traditional architecture and the disguised Cem houses of Onar village, Malatya-Arapgir 
G F
Wall decorations at Arslantepe: study and conservation 
N K
Cultural heritage management of a prehistoric site in northwest Turkey: Aktopraklik 
ARSLANTEPE
C A, G L
Structural damage from earthquakes in the Late Chalcolithic palatial complex of Arslantepe,
Malatya (Turkey) 
F B R
Pottery analysis and the archaeological context. Choosing samples, counting, weighing and
interpreting materials in context 
S C
Tales from the oor: investigating the use of space in the site of Arslantepe (Malatya, Turkey)
by means of micro-residues 
G M D N
Reappraising the Middle Bronze Age at Arslantepe and in the Malatya plain 
F D F
Building a digital repository for the Arslantepe archaeological record (ArsDB) 
Y S E, V DA
Plano-occipital attening: intentional or unintentional treatment? 
P F
Pottery archaeometry in a multi-layered settlement: methodological and theoretical
considerations 
G S
Preliminary faunistic research of the Middle Bronze Age (V-A) at Arslantepe 
F M
Contextualizing crisis? Some thoughts on the end of the Bronze Age in the Euphrates region 
MISCELLANEA
I C
Red painted plaster at Neolithic Yumuktepe: a case of symbolic remembering? 
J Mª C
Mud brick platforms during the Iron Age in Central Asia impressions in Izat Kuli, Dahistan
(Turkmenistan) 
A G
Material for a history of Eneolithic research in Italy 
M I, Y Y, G Ö
Karaz - From today to yesterday. Kura-Araxes pottery of the Erzurum plain: study and obser-
vation of its decorations 
L N
A Late Bronze II terracotta gurine of Ishtar from Ruseifah, Jordan 
F P
A fragment of an old syrian sculpture from Ebla 
F S
A lesson in photography. For my shoes there are no sundays 
H T
An overview of potsherds with building and tree depictions recovered in Domuztepe

B U
e domestication of plants and the role of Anatolia 
M V, R B, L C, M P,
M B
Materiality of two vessels in Southern Turkmenian style from Shahr-i Sokhta (Sistan, Iran,
c. 3100-2900 BC) 
Leadership strategies and the multi-linear development of
social complexity in Ubaid Mesopotamia and Susa A
southwestern Iran (5500-4000 BCE)
G J. S*
* Oriental Institute, University of Chicago
A
Between  and  BC, complex societies developed across the Near East, laying the foundations for the rst
urbanized states in the th millennium. Comparison of these earliest complex societies in three regions - ) the South
Mesopotamian Ubaid, ) the “Northern Ubaid” of Upper Mesopotamia, and ) Southwestern Iran in the Susa A (Susa
I) period makes it clear that aspiring leaders used a range of alternative leadership strategies that varied by region. e
earliest leaders seem to have mobilized supporters and concentrated surpluses through persuasion and consensus, using
existing community social structures such as kinship networks, patron-client relationships, economic rewards, prestige
goods, feasting, and ritual. Control of ritual was one way to extend the sphere of inuence for aspiring leaders far beyond
the kinship system. Inter-regional comparison of developmental dynamics suggests that economic processes such as sta-
ple nance and local-scale ritual were major factors in corporate leadership strategies and the development of emergent
complexity in Ubaid Southern Mesopotamia. By contrast, a combination of wealth nance, prestige goods exchange,
and control over large scale public ritual appears to have played a much more important role in the development of the
th millennium BCE Susa A/I polity of Southwestern Iran.
Keywords: Ubaid, complex societies, Susa A, South and Upper Mesopotamian
One of Marcella Frangipane’s greatest contributions to the study of ancient Near eastern civi-
lizations has been her emphasis on the fact that there was great variability in the organization of the
earliest complex societies and in their processes and trajectories of development. Although many
factors - structural, historical, organizational, environmental, economic, and demographic, etc. - were
all important in the initial development of social complexity, one especially useful way to understand
this variation is to examine the role of agency – specically the strategies that the earliest leaders used
to gain dierent kinds of social power. is paper compares the earliest complex societies of South
Mesopotamia, North Mesopotamia, and the Susiana plain of Southwest Iran in the late th and th
millennia BCE to highlight some of these dierent pathways to power (Fig. ).
e world’s rst complex societies developed in parallel across the Near East in th-th millennia
BC – emerging from the earlier Neolithic food producing village cultures of the region. e surpluses
of animal products and crops produced by these village societies were forms of wealth that could be
mobilized or concentrated by the earliest elites, who then attempted to convert these economic advan-
tages into centralized, and later formalized political power. e economic and political development
of these incipient complex societies or chiefdoms was very gradual for almost  years, but at about
 BCE, there was a major acceleration in the rate and magnitude of social change. By the mid th
millennium BC, the social landscape had been radically transformed with the rapid emergence of
powerful institutionalized leaders, social hierarchy, marked economic stratication, and increasingly
centralized polities that we can recognize as “states”.
e.g. Frangipane , , .
e.g. Blanton et alii ; Clark ; Earle , ; Feinman ; Frangipane ; Hayden ; Mills ;
Stanish ; Yoee ; Vaughn et alii.
4 Gil J. Stein
Anthropological-archaeological thinking about initial complexity has changed enormously in
the decades since the chiefdom model was rst developed. e key change has been a movement away
from adaptationist-functionalist or social-evolutionary typological models of chiefdoms to models
that focus more on agency – specically the strategies through which aspiring leaders gained power,
and formalized socio-economic inequality as a new set of enforceable rules in the social system. As
part of this overall movement away from the social-evolutionary paradigm, the traditional understan-
ding of “chiefdoms” has been critiqued, and re-conceptualized in more dynamic terms of the political
economy of leadership, rather than societal typology (e.g. Earle ). To avoid the paralysis of termi-
nological debates, in the present paper I use the term “incipient complex societies” to refer to those
emergent centralized polities in the Near East that later developed into hierarchical state societies.
Brian Hayden and John Clark have highlighted the dierent political strategies such as feasting,
patron-client relations, and bride-wealth that early leaders used to gain power, mobilize surpluses, and
gain power in emergent complex societies. Richard Blanton and Gary Feinman have proposed the
continuum from inclusive, group-focused “corporate” political strategies to more exclusive, patron-
client “network” political strategies as a useful way to understand the emergence of leadership and
how multi-linear developmental pathways to complexity might have occurred.
More recently, the focus on leadership strategies has broadened to examine how aspiring leaders
interact with the broader community. Researchers have come to recognize that – in the early stages
of this developmental process - the earliest political leaders were in fact very weak – they had formal
positions of higher rank, but very little actual power. In these situations, aspiring leaders could not
really force the broader community to obey them. Instead of coercion, the earliest leaders had to use
persuasion, rewards, inspiration, and consensus as ways to attract followers, mobilize surpluses, and
gain real power. In other words, the broader community had to agree to participate in the social chan-
ges in a social contract that ultimately increased the power of emerging leaders and led to true ine-
quality. In focusing on the emergence of centralized leadership, we have to look at how these aspiring
leaders mobilized four dierent types of power: ideological, military, economic, or political - and the
ways that these forms of power were concentrated, exercised, and institutionalized in a community.
Some of the strategies used to gain these dierent kinds of power are: feasting, religious rituals, long
distance trade for prestige goods, intensied agro-pastoral production, and (in later stages) warfare.
Control over religious ritual is one common strategy used by aspiring leaders, because it enables them
to extend the range of potential supporters far beyond the limits of their own kin group to include
and mobile a much wider social eld (Fig. ). e incipient complex societies of South Mesopotamia,
North Mesopotamia, and Southwest Iran seem to have diered signicantly in the pathways to power
followed by their leaders.
S M – U (. - BC)
e Ubaid culture of southern Mesopotamia provides the earliest evidence for the emergence
of emergent social complexity in the Early Chalcolithic period from the th -th millennia BC, and it
forms the basis for the development of urbanized state societies in the th millennium BC. e Ubaid
material culture style originated in southern Mesopotamia during the Ubaid ,, and  phases; in the
Fried ; Service .
Yoee ; Pauketat .
Hayden ; Clark .
Blanton et alii ; Feinman .
See for e.g. Frangipane ; Vaughn et alii .
e.g. Mills ; Stanish .
Mann .
 Carter, Philip ; Henrickson, uesen ; Oates .
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 5
subsequent Ubaid - phases it spread to northern Mesopotamia. e Ubaid is best known from the
sites of Eridu and Oueilli. We have evidence for irrigation economies, - ha towns dominating
clusters of satellite villages, the development of increasingly large temples in these centers and socio-
economic dierentiation. In southern Sumer, we can see eld and canal systems positioned to supply
the regional centers of Eridu and Ur with agricultural goods. At Oueilli, a large granary attests to the
concentration of signicant agricultural surpluses, and we see evidence for centralized cra produc-
tion . At Eridu, excavations showed the development of temples with a formalized ground plan, orien-
tation, and architectural features. e best evidence for socio-economic dierentiation comes from
the village site of Abada in central Mesopotamia, where extensive horizontal clearances showed major
dierences in size between house A – the largest house at the site, and the other contemporaneous
residences. House A remained the largest house over three successive building phases, suggesting
that dierences in wealth were passed along inter-generationally and were becoming formalized so-
cial ranking. However, these developments took place with no architectural, artifactual, or mortuary
evidence for powerful hierarchical leaders: the only hint of such authority derives from Eridu, where
the terracotta gurine of a male wearing an elaborate necklace and holding a mace may represent a
formal leader, but this interpretation remains tentative (Fig. ).
Leadership strategies and political organization almost certainly diered from those of North
Mesopotamia. Southern Mesopotamia was organized as a series of small-scale complex polities in
which leaders used their role in the temple-based ritual system to mobilize the surpluses generated by
irrigation in a system of staple nance. To eectively mobilize kin and community labor or resources,
leaders would have relied on what Blanton and Feinman have called corporate strategies emphasizing
social inclusiveness and downplayed visible status or economic dierences. e corporate character
of Southern Mesopotamia ts with Kent Flannerys suggestion that Near Eastern chiefdoms are hard
to detect archaeologically because leaders based their power on coalition building, sacred knowledge,
and the use of their economic advantages to reward followers, rather than using a political economy
based on prestige goods.
Emerging leaders in Southern Mesopotamia thus seem to have been able to control and mo-
bilize large-scale surpluses in both agricultural and cra production. However, these early complex
polities still seem to have lacked several key markers of social ranking and centralized control. One
surprising aspect of Ubaid economy in Southern Mesopotamia is the absence of copper metallurgy
and copper prestige goods, even though copper was present at Northern Mesopotamian Ubaid sites.
Related to this is the lack of any real evidence for long distance exchange other than the trade in obsi-
dian – largely as a utilitarian commodity rather than a prestige good. Lower Mesopotamian sites also
have little evidence for administrative technology such as stamp seals and seal impressed closures on
containers or doors, despite the presence of this technology at Ubaid sites in northern Mesopotamia.
Leaders in southern Mesopotamia seem to have used corporate strategies and close links to ritual
institutions and religious ideologies as a means to mobilize economic surpluses from irrigation agri-
culture. Control over ritual allows a leader to extend his range of inuence far beyond the limits of his
kinship network to link with a much larger population. is ritual tie allows for both an increase in
 Safar, Lloyd ; Huot , , .
 Wright .
 Huot ; .
 Jasim , .
 Stein : -.
 Stein .
 Blanton et alii ; Feinman .
 Flannery .
 Matthews ; Rothman ; Tobler .
 Netting .
176 Gil J. Stein
scale of polity and in the numbers of people who can be mobilized to contribute either surplus goods or
labor. Larger scale systems of this sort can produce consistently higher levels of surplus, thereby incre-
asing economic dierentiation and providing the currency to attract and reward followers. At the same
time, the ritual role of leaders legitimates and reinforces their authority. is ritual-based authority
would have been grounded – at least initially - in consensus and shared ideology, rather than coercion.
Finally, the linkage of rulers to temples would have built up the role of temple towns as “ide-
ological attractors”, thereby naturalizing the sacred landscape as a permanent part of the political
landscape. e increasing size of the temples at Eridu is consistent with the centrality of ritual insti-
tutions in Southern Mesopotamia. e leaders of Ubaid south Mesopotamian polities fused three key
sources of power - political, economic, and ritual – into larger scale, richer, and more resilient systems
than had ever existed before. ese polities would have had a greater structural capacity for growth,
and eventually developed into the rst urbanized states.
N M - U, LC-,  LC-
e leadership strategies and political economy of South Mesopotamia seem to have diered from
the contemporaneous polities of North Mesopotamia in the later Ubaid. e . ha regional center of
Zeidan in North Syria has evidence for economic intensication and specialization, prestige goods, admi-
nistrative artifacts, and large scale public architecture in the Ubaid period. Zeidan is a triple mounded
site with a continuous occupation sequence spanning the Halaf, Ubaid, LC- and LC- periods.
Our data on the Ubaid period farming system at Zeidan are fragmentary but very suggestive.
Zeidan is located on edge of the Balikh river oodplain where the traditional system of irrigation is
oodwater recession agriculture. Ethnographic studies suggest that tendencies toward stratication
were inherent in riverine societies using ood recession agriculture in arid regions. Each year, the
best land is reserved for the highest ranking families and lineages. Lower ranking families must pay
tithes to the higher ranking families to get access to land. ese practices reinforce wealth dierences
in a system of institutionalized economic inequality and allow for the rapid accumulation of surplus.
Both the location and size of Zeidan t perfectly within the set of conditions where one would expect
to see land tenure systems of this type. If this were, in fact, the case, then both agriculture and herding
would have created and perpetuated major wealth dierences ta Zeidan.
Zeidan has also produced evidence for cra specialization in ceramic and lithic production.
Excavations recovered a concentration of ten kilns on the south mound (Stein b: ). Evidence
for specialized lithic production comes from a workshop found on the Northeast mound. A con-
centration of blade and ake cores, cortical akes, production debris, and nished tools was found
with three deer antler punches to manufacture the blades. Zeidan also has evidence for a variety of
prestige goods made from exotic raw materials and carefully worked by skilled artisans: fragmentary
polished stone palette, a polished obsidian bowl, a mace head, and a chlorite wand (Fig. ). Traces of
large scale Ubaid public architecture include part of a large mud brick fortication or enclosure wall
. m wide and preserved to a height of . m. Excavations also exposed a large . m thick mud brick
buttressed wall - possibly the enclosure wall surrounding a large public building. In addition, admi-
nistrative artifacts such as tokens, sealing clays, seals, and seal impressions are also present at Zeidan
and Tepe Gawra. Finally, in the north we have evidence for the growth in long-distance exchange in
 Stein , b, .
 Anastasiou et alii ; Smith et alii.
 Park .
 Stein : -.
 Stein b: .
 Stein : -.
 Stein b; Tobler ; Matthews ; Rothman .
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 177
prestige goods made from obsidian, lapis lazuli, turquoise, carnelian, and copper, suggesting an in-
crease in the degree of hierarchy and elite inuence in the later th millennium. e evidence from
Zeidan, Gawra, and other sites suggests that Ubaid North Mesopotamia was a set of loosely organized
small scale polities whose aspiring leaders combined both staple and wealth nance to mobilize sur-
pluses from the production of subsistence goods and specialized cras, while forging long distance
exchange connections to procure exotic raw materials for prestige goods.
Some of the most important contrasts in political economy and pathways to power between
South versus North Mesopotamia lay in the realm of ritual institutions and ritual power. Although
temples were important in the political economy of Southern Mesopotamia, large-scale formal ritual
institutions did not play a major role in the development of early complex societies in North Mesopo-
tamia. e only known temples in North Mesopotamia are found very late in the Ubaid sequence and
appear only in Gawra level XIII. Large centralized temples disappear in the succeeding level XII and
are also absent from the succeeding Late Chalcolithic - strata at the site. Although the architectu-
ral form of the niched and buttressed long-room temple may have been transplanted to the north at
Gawra, the temples must have functioned in dierent ways from the south, since they did not have the
capacity to draw on the large scale surpluses of irrigation agriculture.
Aer the Ubaid, the Late Chalcolithic LC and LC periods in northern Mesopotamia show
major growth toward greater stratication, long distance trade, feasting, elite emergence, and the be-
ginnings of urbanization. By about  BC, the southern extension of Hamoukar reaches a size of
up to  ha, and has produced evidence for large scale long distance trade and specialist production
of ceramics, obsidian and copper. Tell Brak also reaches urban proportions large scale secular public
architecture and feasting activities provide strong evidence for powerful formalized leadership in the
LC- period. By the LC period ca  BC, we can see that urbanized state societies had developed.
e emergence of institutionalized leadership in northern Mesopotamia was most likely based
on economic, rather than ritual power. In the LC period, when we do nally see clear evidence for
the residences of formal leaders in the form of the large, distinctive “round house” and the rich tombs
of Gawra XI-A/B in the post Ubaid LC-, it occurs without any visible tie to ritual institutions. I am
not saying that religion and ritual were absent in North Mesopotamia; I am simply proposing that
religious institutions were not as closely linked to emerging political leadership as they were in the
south. North Mesopotamian leaders appear to have relied primarily on their kinship network as a
source of followers and supporters, reinforced by the wealth accumulated through long-distance trade
in a prestige goods political economy. is would have contrasted with the southern Mesopotamian
polities, whose leaders would have been able to draw on the much broader pool of support mobilized
through both kinship and ritual ties.
S I - S: S A/S I (   BC)
Some of our best evidence for the development of emergent complex societies in southwestern
Iran comes from the Susa A or Susa I period in the late h millennium, when Susa was settled and
rapidly grew to be a major regional center of approximately  ha; to the east, Chogha Mish also appe-
ars to have been a center of comparable size before the full emergence of Susa. Settlement patterns on
 Stein .
 Stein a; see also Rothman  for an alternative interpretation of the niched and buttressed public build-
ings at Gawra.
 Marro ; Stein .
 al Quntar et alii.
 Ur et alii ; Stein .
 Stein ; Tobler ; Peasnall .
 Hole : .
178 Gil J. Stein
the Susiana plain show a two level settlement hierarchy of regional centers and clusters of dependent
villages – similar what is present in the Ur-Eridu region of Ubaid southern Mesopotamia. is is
consistent with the typical settlement pattern for emergent complex societies. However, the available
evidence suggests that the polities of the two regions diered in basic aspects of agricultural economy
and surplus production. As far as we know, in contrast to southern Mesopotamia, canal irrigation
agriculture was not practiced on the Susiana plain in the Susa A or Susa I period, although oodwater
recession irrigation may have been in use. As a result, there would not have been the kinds of eco-
nomic intensication and large scale surplus production that would have developed in the irrigation-
based southern Ubaid subsistence economy. Equally important, the architecture, burials, and objects
from the Susa Acropole show that Susa A emergent complex societies had very dierent forms of elite
political economy, ritual organization and leadership strategies from those of Ubaid Mesopotamia.
In contrast with Ubaid south Mesopotamia, where the burials are uniformly simple with only a
few plain ceramic vessels, the burials in the massif funeraire at Susa contain large amounts of prestige
goods such as the tall painted Susa A beakers (Fig. ). Although present in small amounts at other smal-
ler settlements and at Chogha Mish, the tall painted Susa A beakers are highly concentrated at Susa, the
paramount center in the Susiana region. ere is also a remarkable amount of copper in these high status
burials -  copper axes, along with  copper disks whose form and decoration suggest that they were
prestige goods and items used in ritual. Geochemical analyses of the Susa copper artifacts indicate that
the copper was imported to Susa from the Anarak mines on the Iranian plateau, more than  km to
the northeast. is is important evidence for long-distance trade in a prestige goods economy.
e complex stamp seals and sealings from Susa mark the presence and power of elites linked
with ritual activity (Fig. ). Wright’s analysis of the Susa I/A glyptic suggests that the seals and seal
impressions fall into two groups. Out of a total sample of  seals and sealings,  can be classied
as “simple”, while only  (concentrated in the Susa Acropole mortuary contexts) can be classied as
“complex” - with “Master of Animals” and cruciform motifs. is dichotomy in the glyptic numbers
and degree of elaboration is consistent with a social division between elites and commoners. At the
same time, the “Master of Animals” motifs on the complex seals and sealings show masked gures
who are clearly engaged in ritual performance. It is signicant that they are surrounded by other
plainly clothed gures bowing down to them (Fig. a).
e nal key line of evidence is the enormous square mud brick platform at the south end of
the Susa Acropole: – this structure measured  meters on a side, and was at least  m. tall, con-
sisting of two stages with corner recesses that give the entire platform a cruciform top plan, with an
estimated volume of , cubic meters. In design and scale, the Susa platform dwarfs the much
smaller Ubaid temples of Eridu and Ur. On top of the Susa platform were a granary and several other
buildings of signicant size and height. e Susa platform would have completely dominated the lan-
dscape, and likely served as an arena for the public ritual performances depicted on the seals and seal
impressions. e Susa A/I “Haute Terasse” platform on the Acropole may represent an elaboration of
the earlier monumental, public ritual building at Chogha Mish. e monumental size and ceremo-
nial function of the Susa acropole platform suggest that leaders were able to use ritual authority to
mobilize large groups of followers to provide the labor for its construction.
 Johnson ; Wright .
 Mashkour et alii.
 Hole : ; Helwing : .
 Moorey : ; Matthews, Fazeli : .
 Amiet ; Le Brun ; Wright :, table .
 Hole : .
 Figure ; Canal a and b.
 Wright : .
 Hole : .
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 179
e emergent complex polity that developed on the Susiana plain in the mid-late th millennium
BC has clear evidence for stratication, a distinctive elite with shared symbols, monumental public
architecture, long distance trade for copper, prestige goods, complex two-tier administrative techno-
logy, and ritually based leadership with the capacity to mobilize large groups for extended periods
to construct monumental public architecture. Leaders of the Susa A/I polity seem to have used long
distance exchange for prestige goods in a system of “wealth nance”
, and elite art styles to reward
wealthier elites, while using ritually-based authority and public ceremonial performances to mobilize
surplus labor and agricultural goods from the broader population in the surrounding villages, thereby
institutionalizing their leadership role within a religious-ideological context.
Although the emergent complex polity of the Susiana was clearly quite powerful, we should
be careful not to confuse power with stability. Gilman notes that polities based on wealth nance
and long distance exchange can grow rapidly to positions of great wealth, but they are vulnerable to
collapse if there is any disruption of the trade routes that are so vital for their economic survival. At
the same time, the relatively weak structure of political authority encourages competition for power
between chiefs and other high ranking elites from their own or other kin groups; as a result, these
polities undergo periodic cycles of consolidation, conict, collapse, and re-constitution. e multi-
ple episodes in which the Susa Acropole platform was burned are consistent with the idea of a polity
that while impressive, was also vulnerable to periodic collapse through a combination of economic
disruption and political instability.
C
e emergent complex societies of these three regions all had economic dierentiation and some
degree of centralized, hierarchical political leadership. However, they diered signicantly in political
economy and in the pathways to power followed by their leaders (Table ).
Leaders in Ubaid south Mesopotamia pursued corporate strategies that emphasized communi-
ty and kin membership in politics and smaller scale local ritual. ey combined ritual, kinship, and
socio-economic dierentiation into an infrastructure for hierarchy that allowed for larger, wealthier,
and more stable polities using corporate strategies to mobilize the large surpluses of irrigation agri-
culture in a staple nance system.
S. Mesopotamia N. Mesopotamia SW Iran
Power Sources Economic Ideological Economic Economic, ideological
Political Strategy Corporate Network Network
Finance Strategy Staple Wealth (and staple?) Wealth (& staple?)
Long-Distance Trade Absent Present Present
Prestige Goods Absent Present Present
Copper Metallurgy Absent Present Present
Seals & Sealings Absent Present Present
Irrigation Canal Floodwater recession Absent (?)
Role of Ritual Medium Low High
Table  - Comparative Leadership Strategies and Pathways to Power
 d’Altroy, Earle .
 Gilman .
 Wright .
 Hole ; 2008, .
180 Gil J. Stein
By contrast, the north Mesopotamian th millennium polities of the Ubaid and LC - periods
relied on a combination of staple and wealth nance to mobilize surpluses through kin connections
and long distance trade for prestige goods, and complex administrative technology in a network stra-
tegy that dened elites and emphasized dierences between themselves and commoners. Ritual insti-
tutions in the north did not serve as a signicant source of power or legitimacy for leaders, who were
only able to extend their power up to the spatial and demographic limits of kinship organization.
e Susa A/I polity diered from both the north and south Mesopotamian Ubaid by combining
a political economy based on long-distance exchange or wealth nance to secure prestige goods, ritual
authority, and administrative technology of stamp seals and sealings in a network-based strategy that
linked political leadership to large-scale public ritual for legitimacy and authority. e ritually based
Susa A polity was elaborate but unstable and prone to periodic cycles of collapse. By contrast, the sta-
ple-nance based polities of Ubaid southern Mesopotamia were smaller scale and less elaborate, but
much more stable in structural terms. is comparison of southern Mesopotamia, Northern Mesopo-
tamia, and southwestern Iran suggests that the earliest complex societies in the Near East developed
by dierent pathways; the key to understanding those alternative trajectories is to focus on variation
in the strategies through which aspiring leaders gained and maintained power.
Note: is chapter is the revision of a paper originally presented at the th International Con-
gress of Young Iranian Archaeologists, Tehran University, Tehran - October -, .
B
-Q S., K L., U J.  - Proto-Urbanism in the Late th Millennium BC: survey and
Excavations at Khirbat al-Fakhar (Hamoukar), northeast Syria, Paleorient (): -.
A   P.  - Glyptique Susienne, Memoires de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Iran XLIII,
Geuthner, Paris.
A E., K L., S G., M P.  - Prehistoric schistosomiasis parasite found in
the Middle East, e Lancet: Infectious Diseases  July : -.
B R., F G., K S.A., P P.  - A Dual-Processual eory for the
Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization, Current Anthropology: -.
C D. a - La Terrace Haute de l’Acropole de Suse, Cahiers de la Delegation Archaeologigique
Francaise en Iran : -.
C D. b - La Haute Terrace de l’Acropole de Susa, Paléorient : -.
C R., P G. eds.  - Beyond the Ubaid. Transformtion and Integration in the Late Prehi-
storic Societies of the Middle East, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization no. . Oriental Insti-
tute of the University of Chicago, Chicago.
C J.  - Towards a Better Explanation of Social Inequality: A Critical Assessment of Natural
and Historic Human Agents, in Agency in Archaeology, M.-A. Dobres, J. Robb eds., Routledge,
London: -.
D’A T. N., E T. K.  - Staple Finance, Wealth Finance, and Storage in the Inka Political
Economy, Current Anthropology (): -.
E T.  - Property Rights and the Evolution of Chiefdoms, in Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and
Ideology, T. Earle ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: -.
E T.  - How Chiefs Come to Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
F G.  - e Emergence of Inequality. A Focus on Strategies and Processes, in Foundations
of Social Inequality, T. D. Price, G. Feinman eds., Plenum Press, NY: -.
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 181
F K.  - Chiefdoms in the Early Near East: Why its so Hard to Identify em, in e
Iranian World: Essays on Iranian Art and Archaeology, A. Alizadeh, Y. Majidzadeh, S. M. Shah-
mirzadi eds., Tehran, Iran University Press: -.
F M.  - Dierent Types of Egalitarian Societies and the Development of Inequality in
Early Mesopotamia, World Archaeology : -.
F M.  - Dierent Models of Power Structuring at the Rise of Hierarchical Societies in
the Near East: Primary Economy versus luxury and defense management, in e Development
of Pre-State Communities in the Ancient Near East. Studies in Honour of Edgar Peltenburg, D.
Bolger, L. Maguire eds., BANEA Publications Series vol. , Oxbow Books, Oxford: -.
F M.  - Dierent types of multiethnic societies and dierent patterns of development
and change in the prehistoric Near East, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS);
https://www.pnas.org/content///
F M.  - e Evolution of Political Society, Random House, NY.
G A.  - Unequal Development in Copper Age Iberia, in Specialization, Exchange, and Com-
plex Societies, E. Brumel, T. Earle eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: -.
H B.  - Pathways to Power: Principles for Creating Socioeconomic Inequalities, in Founda-
tions of Social Inequality, T. D. Price, G. Feinman eds., Plenum Press, NY: -.
H B.  - Early metallurgy in Iran: An Innovative Region as seen from the inside, in Me-
tal Matters. Innovative Technologies and Social Change in Prehistory and Antiquity, S. Burmei-
ster, S. Hansen, M. Kunst and N. Müller-Scheeßel eds., Menschen-Kulturen-Traditionen, For-
schungscluster , Band :, Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden: -.
H E., T I. eds.  - Upon is Foundation - e Ubaid Reconsidered, Carsten
Niebuhr Institute Publication no. , Copenhagen.
H F.  - Symbols of Religion and Social Organization at Susa, in e Hilly Flanks and Beyond.
Essays on the Prehistory of Southwest Asia, T. C. Young Jr., P. E. L. Smith, P. Mortensen eds.,
University of Chicago Oriental Institute, Chicago: -.
H F.  - Ritual and the Collapse of Susa, ca.  BC, Proceedings of the Fih International
Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, J. Cordoba, M. Molist, C. Perez Aparicio,
I. Rubio de Miguel, S. Martinez Lillo eds., Madrid: - .
H F.  - A Monumental Failure. e Collapse of Susa, in Beyond the Ubaid: Transformation
and Integration in the Late Prehistoric Societies of the Middle East, Carter R., Phillips G. eds.,
Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization number ,
Chicago: -.
H J.-L.  - Ubaidian Villages of Southern Mesopotamia. Permanence and Evolution from Ubaid
 to Ubaid  as Seen from Tell el Oueilli, in Upon this Foundation - e Ubaid Reconsidered,
E. Henrickson, I. uesen eds., Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications , Copenhagen: -.
H J.-L.  - e First farmers at Oueilli, Biblical Archaeologist (): -.
H, J.-L. ed.  - Oueili: travaux de 1987 et 1989, Recherche sur les civilisations, Paris.
J S.A.  - e Ubaid Period in Iraq. Recent Excavations in the Hamrin Region, BAR Internatio-
nal Series , Oxford.
J S.A.  - Structure and Function in an Ubaid Village, in Upon this Foundation - e Ubaid
Reconsidered, E. Henrickson, I. uesen eds., Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications , Copen-
hagen: -.
J G.  - Local Exchange and Early State Development in Southwestern Iran, University of
Michigan Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Paper no. , Ann Arbor, MI.
L B A.  - Recherches Stratigraphiques a l’Acropole de Suse (-), Cahiers de D.A.F.I. :
-.
M M.  - e Sources of Social Power, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
M C. ed.  - Aer the Ubaid. Interpreting Change from the Caucasus to Mesopotamia at the
182 Gil J. Stein
Dawn of Urban Civilization, Varia Anatolica , De Boccard Édition-Diusion, Paris.
M M., B A.M., W T. J., K N., A A.  - “Human-En-
vironment Interactions on the Upper Khuzestan Plains, Southwest Iran. Recent Investigations”,
Paléorient (): -.
M R.  - Seals and Sealing Practices in Upper Mesopotamia and Iran in the Ubaid Pe-
riod, in Fundstellen: Gesammelte Schrien zur Archaologie und Geschichte Altvorderasiens ad
honorem Hartmut Kühne, D. Bonatz, R. M. Czichon, F.J. Kreppner eds., Harrassowitz Verlag,
Wiesbaden: -.
M R., F H.  - Copper and Complexity: Iran and Mesopotamia in the Fourth Mil-
lennium B.C, Iranica Antiqua  :-.
M B. ed.  - Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, University of Ari-
zona Press, Tucson.
M P.R.S.  - Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
N R.M.  - Sacred Power and Centralization: Aspects of Political Adaptation in Africa, in
Population Growth: Anthropological Perspectives, Spooner, B. ed., MIT Press, Cambridge (MA):
-.
O J.  - Ubaid Mesopotamia Revisited, in From Handaxe to Khan. Essays presented to Peder
Mortensen on the occasion of his 70th birthday, K. von Folsach, H. rane eds., Aarhus Univer-
sity Press, Aarhus: -.
O J., O D.  - e Role of Exchange Relations in the Origins of Mesopotamian Civili-
zation, in Explaining Social Change: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew, J. Cherry, J. Scarre, S.
Shennan eds., McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge: -.
P T.  - Early Trends Toward Class Stratication: Chaos, Common Property, and Flood Reces-
sion Agriculture, American Anthropologist:-.
P  T.  - Chiefdoms and Other Archaeological Delusions, Alta Mira Press, Lanham.
P B.  - Appendix - Burials from Tepe Gawra, Levels VIII to XI A/B, in Tepe Gawra. e
Evolution of a Small, Prehistoric Center in Northeastern Iraq, M. Rothman ed., University of
Pennsylvania Museum Monograph , Philadelphia: -.
R M.  - Religion, Ritual, and Social Networks: Tepe Gawra in the Late th and Early th
Millennia BC, Subartu : -.
S F., M M.A., L S., -A M.,  – Eridu, Republic of Iraq, Ministry of Cultu-
re and Information, State Organization of Antiquities and Heritage, Baghdad.
S E.  - Primitive Social Organization, An Evolutionary Perspective, Random House, NY.
S A. G P., S G.  - Ubaid Plant Use at Tell Zeidan, Syria, Paléorient  (): -.
S C.  - e Evolution of Chiefdoms: An Economic Anthropolgoical Model, in Archaeolo-
gical Perspectives on Political Economies, G. Feinman, L. Nicholas eds., University of Utah Press,
Salt Lake City: -.
S G.  - Economy, Ritual, and Power in Ubaid Mesopotamia, in Chiefdoms and Early States in
the Near East: e Organizational Dynamics of Complexity, Stein, G., Rothman, R. eds., Mona-
graphs in World Prehistory , Prehistory Press, Madison: -.
S G.  - Tell Zeidan (), Oriental Institute Annual Report 2008-2009: -.
S G. a - Local Identities and Interaction Spheres: Modeling Regional Variation in the Ubaid
Horizon, in Beyond the Ubaid: Transformation and Integration in the Late Prehistoric Societies
of the Middle East, R. Carter, G. Phillips eds., Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, Studies
in Ancient Oriental Civilization number , Chicago: -.
S G. b - Tell Zeidan (), Oriental Institute Annual Report 2009-2010: -.
S G.  - Tell Zeidan (), Oriental Institute Annual Report 2010-2011: -.
S G.  - e Development of Indigenous Social Complexity In Late Chalcolithic Upper Meso-
potamia in e th -th Millennia BC – An Initial Assessment, Origini : -.
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 183
T A.  - Excavations at Tepe Gawra vol. II, levels IX-XX, University of Pennsylvania Univer-
sity Museum, Philadelphia.
V K. E J., K J. eds.  - e Evolution of Leadership: Transitions in Decision
Making from Small Scale to Middle-Range Societies, SAR Press, Santa Fe.
U J., K P., O J.  - e Spatial Dimensions of Early Mesopotamian Urbanism, Iraq
: -.
W H.  - Appendix: e Southern Margins of Sumer, in Heartland of Cities, Adams, R. McC.
ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago: -.
W H.  - Prestate Political Formations, in On the Evolution of Complex Societies. Essays in
Honor of Harry Hoijer, W. Sanders, H. Wright, R. McC. Adams eds., Undena Press, Malibu: -
.
Y N.  - Too Many Chiefs? (Or, Safe Texts for the s), in Archaeological eory: Who Sets the
Agenda? N. Yoee, A. Sherratt eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: -.
Y N.  - Myths of the Archaic State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Y N.  - e Unbearable Lightness of Complexity, in Ancient Complexities: New Perspectives
in Precolumbian North America, S. Alt ed., University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City: -.
Y N. ed.  - e Cambridge World History. Volume III. Early Cities in Comparative Perspecti-
ve, 4000 BCE - 1200 CE, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
184 Gil J. Stein
Fig. 2 - Schematic representation of the use of ritual to extend the social eld of inuence by aspiring leaders beyond the
domain of kinship relations.
Fig. 1 - Map of the Near East showing the location of the 6th-5th millennium BCE emergent complex societies of Nor-
thern Mesopotamia, southern Mesopotamia, and Southwestern Iran.
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 185
Fig. 3 - South Mesopotamian Ubaid terracotta gurine
from Eridu – possibly depicting an early polity leader
with elaborate necklace and mace or scepter as em-
blems of authority (Safar and Lloyd 1981).
Fig. 4 - Susa A/I painted beaker and burial from the massif funeraire at the base of the high platform on the Susa Acropole
186 Gil J. Stein
Fig. 5 - North Mesopotamian Ubaid prestige goods. A. Copper axes (Gawra); B. Mace Heads; C. Gound stone palettes
and mace heads (Gawra); D. Carved obsidian bowl Zeidan); E. Carved chlorite wand (Zeidan)
Leadership strategies and multi-linear social complexity in Ubaid 187
Fig. 6 - Seals and seal impressions from the Susa A/I period, with motifs including the “Master of Animals” and ritual
scenes: A. Drawing by Abbas Alizadeh; B. drawings from Hole 2010.
Fig. 7 - Plan of the Susa A/I high terrace platform.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
After briefly examining the forms of cultural contact in pre- and protohistoric societies in relation to the problem of the varying perception of territories and their "borders" as well as of "membership" in those societies, and after a brief reconsideration of the concept of culture and ethnicity in such archaic contexts, this paper then examines three examples of multiethnic societies in the Near East, and specifically in Upper Mesopotamia and Southeast Anatolia, in the fifth, fourth, and at the beginning of the third millennia before the common era (BCE), respectively. These examples are dealt with as emblematic cases of different models of society, types of interaction with alien groups, levels of integration, and development dynamics. Each of these cases is examined with respect to its socioeconomic context, the archeological evidence of "multiethnicity," the types of interaction between different components, the degree of cultural integration achieved, and the effects on the dynamics of change and the development of the societies examined. By analyzing and comparing these examples, the paper aims to show how interethnic contact impacted differently on different societies according to their types, the reasons and purposes of the interaction, and the degree of integration achieved.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter reexamines one of the most perplexing questions in arc.haeology and anthropology: Why, after millennia of successfully living in politically egalitarian hunting-gathering bands or village societies, did some groups develop social ranking characteristic of big-man societies and simple chiefdoms? This process is a brief moment in cultural evolutionary time, but it represents the crossing of a great social threshold. The shift from a society in which each social unit of production and consumption is more or less equal to one in which a few individuals or families co~trol or manage components of the economy constitutes a fundamental change in the way people interact with one another. The origin of state societies, in which the coercive power of one class over others becomes insti-tutionalized, is perhaps the only other evolutionary process as significant as the development of rank. The development of rank demands explanation for a number of theoretical reasons, not least of which is the apparent cost assumed by the bulk of the population. These individuals lose some political autonomy as rank develops and as social distances increase among members of the community. The evolution of rank creates groups of people, sometimes over generations, who are accorded or assume greater social prestige than their neighbors. Why people in egalitarian societies would give up or lose autonomy to others in their society is one of the core ques
Article
Les fouilles et prospections systematiques menees entre 1999 et 2010 ont revele les contours d’un site unique dans le nord de la Mesopotamie. Khirbat al-Fakhar est un vaste etablissement de 300 ha, qui a ete occupe essentiellement au cours des periodes 1 et 2 du Chalcolithique recent (ca 4400-3800 cal. BC). Les prospections de surface menees de maniere systematique, l’analyse des images satellites et une fouille ciblee permettent de proposer une caracterisation preliminaire de cet etablissement et d’y souligner en particulier une production intensive sur obsidienne. Ce site etonnamment etendu et precoce souleve des questions concernant la demographie, la sedentarite, la permanence de l’occupation, ainsi que la production et le commerce d’objets en obsidienne. Dans cet article, nous examinons ces aspects a la lumiere des travaux actuels dans la region sur le developpement de la complexite societale et l’urbanisation. Le site de Khirbat al-Fakhar presente a la fois les caracteristiques de villes et de villages, nous le qualifierons de proto-urbain.