Content uploaded by Martin Gilbert
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Martin Gilbert on Apr 05, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Exposure of Wild Sumatran Tiger (Panthera tigris
sumatrae) to Canine Distemper Virus
Authors: Mulia, Bongot Huaso, Mariya, Silmi, Bodgener, Jessica,
Iskandriati, Diah, Liwa, Setyaningsih Rambu, et al.
Source: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 57(2) : 464-466
Published By: Wildlife Disease Association
URL: https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-20-00144
BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles
in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations,
museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your
acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use.
Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use.
Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as
copyright holder.
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit
publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to
critical research.
Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Wildlife-Diseases on 30 Mar 2021
Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-useAccess provided by University of Edinburgh
DOI: 10.7589/JWD-D-20-00144 Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 57(2), 2021, pp. 464–466
ÓWildlife Disease Association 2021
Exposure of Wild Sumatran Tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae) to Canine
Distemper Virus
Bongot Huaso Mulia,
1
Silmi Mariya,
2
Jessica Bodgener,
3
Diah Iskandriati,
2
Setyaningsih Rambu Liwa,
1
Tony Sumampau,
1
Jansen Manansang,
1
Huda S. Darusman,
2
Steven A. Osofsky,
3
Navapon
Techakriengkrai,
4,5,6
and Martin Gilbert
3,6
1
Taman Safari Indonesia, Jalan Kapten Harun Kabir No. 724,
Cibeureum, Cisarua, Bogor, 16750, Indonesia;
2
Primate Research Center, Institute of Research and Community Service,
Bogor Agricultural University (IPB University), Jalan Lodaya ll/5, Bogor, 16151, Indonesia;
3
Cornell Wildlife Health Center,
Wild Carnivore Health Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, 240 Farrier Road, Ithaca, New York
14853, USA;
4
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok,
10330, Thailand;
5
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Animal Pathogens Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok,
10330, Thailand;
6
Corresponding authors (emails: Navapon.T@chula.ac.th; m.gilbert@cornell.edu)
ABSTRACT: Canine distemper virus (CDV) is
recognized as a conservation threat to Amur tigers
(Panthera tigris altaica) in Russia, but the risk to
other subspecies remains unknown. We detected
CDV neutralizing antibodies in nine of 21 wild-
caught Sumatran tigers (42.9%), including one
sampled on the day of capture, confirming
exposure in the wild.
As populations of threatened species such
as tigers (Panthera tigris) continue to decline
and fragment, they become increasingly
vulnerable to stochastic events such as infec-
tious disease outbreaks. Since 2003, infection
with canine distemper virus (CDV) has been
responsible for mortality of endangered Amur
tigers (P. tigris altaica) in Russia and is
estimated to increase the 50-yr extinction
probability of small populations of 25 individ-
uals by as much as 65% (Seimon et al. 2013;
Gilbert et al. 2014, 2015, 2020). There is an
urgent need to evaluate the CDV infection
status of other tiger subspecies, to determine
the potential threat to these vulnerable
populations. Testing strategies based on the
detection of pathogens (such as reverse
transcriptase-PCR) are more useful for syn-
dromic surveillance, where infection is sug-
gested by clinical presentation for agents such
as CDV that are associated with acute disease
and short periods of shedding. These ap-
proaches can lead to epidemiologically valu-
able information (such as sequence data) but
are limited by the infrequency of sampling
opportunities for what are liable to be rare
infection events in a species that is seldom
handled. Serological approaches can repre-
sent a more cost-effective strategy to detect
population exposure to pathogens such as
CDV that evoke a strong and long-lasting
humoral immune response in animals that
recover from infection (Greene and Appel
2006; Brown et al. 2010). We sought to
determine whether wild populations of Suma-
tran tigers (P. tigris sumatrae) have been
exposed to CDV, as a first step toward
determining the potential threat that the virus
might represent to the subspecies.
Sumatran tigers are classified as critically
endangered by the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature, with fewer than 500
individuals thought to exist in the wild (Linkie
et al. 2008). Remaining habitat is highly
fragmented and, although tiger sign has been
positively identified in 33 areas (Wibisono and
Pusparini 2010), many populations are small,
isolated, and vulnerable to stochastic process-
es such as infectious disease introductions.
Serum samples were collected from 21
Sumatran tigers captured from the wild
between 1988 and 2016. All captures were
carried out as part of routine wildlife man-
agement and conflict resolution, with the
exception of three tigers injured by snares.
All 21 tigers were transferred to the zoological
collection Taman Safari Indonesia (Bogor,
West Java), where samples were collected by
park veterinarians. These samples were then
stored at 80 C and heat inactivated at 56 C
for 30 min prior to testing. Serum neutraliza-
tion assays were conducted as described by
Logan et al. (2016), using HEK293 cells
expressing canine signaling lymphocytic acti-
vation molecule (SLAM-F1, the receptor used
by CDV for cell entry) and a replication-
464
Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Wildlife-Diseases on 30 Mar 2021
Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-useAccess provided by University of Edinburgh
deficient vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotype
expressing hemagglutinin and fusion surface
glycoproteins from the Onderstepoort strain
of CDV. The referenced protocol was adapted
slightly by substituting green fluorescent
protein for luciferase to indicate infection,
which negated the need for a luminometer.
All assays were run in quadruplicate using
four-fold serial serum dilutions ranging from
1:16 to 1:16,384. Fluorescent cells were
counted manually in each well, with antibody
titers determined as the highest dilution with
90% reduction in infected cells compared to
the average count from four serum-free
control wells. Final titers were calculated
using the Spearman-Karber method (Lorenz
and B¨
ogel 1973), and a titer of 1:16 or higher
was considered positive.
A total of nine samples were positive (42.9%,
95% confidence interval: 21.8–66.0%, n¼21)
with titers ranging from 1:128 to .1:16,384. Of
these, eight positive samples were collected
between 6 mo and 20 yr after capture from the
wild, preventing differentiation of wild expo-
sures from infections possibly contracted while
in captivity. None of the tigers showed clinical
signs indicative of CDV infection on the day of
capture. The longevity of circulating antibodies
in tigers that have recovered from CDV
infection is unknown, but in dogs, neutralizing
antibodies remain detectable for many years
and possibly the remainder of the animal’slife
(Bohm et al. 2004; Greene and Appel 2006).
Although no cases of clinical disease consistent
with CDV had been recorded in the facility
where these eight positive tigers were held, all
were housed in enclosures with the potential
for access by wild civets or other susceptible
wildlife, representing a possible route for
captive infection. One adult male tiger that
was rescued from a snare in Bengkulu
province, was found to have a titer of 1:8,192
and had been sampled by Taman Safari
Indonesia veterinarians on the day of capture
(12 January 2012), providing clear evidence
that exposure had occurred in the wild. This
tiger subsequently died from his injuries,
apparently unrelated to CDV. The eight other
seropositive tigers originated from Aceh, North
Sumatra, and Bengkulu provinces.
Our pilot study confirms the occurrence of
infection, but is unable to assess extent of
exposure, which would be critical to evaluate
the threat that CDV represents for Sumatran
tiger populations. This could be rectified by
routinely analyzing serum samples collected
whenever wild tigers are captured for conflict
resolution, rehabilitation, or biological re-
search. In Russia since 2000, CDV seroprev-
alence in Amur tiger populations has been
measured as 37.0% (confidence interval: 24.6–
51.3%, n¼54, Gilbert et al. 2020), providing a
source of comparison. Furthermore, field staff
and wildlife managers should be familiarized
with the clinical profile of CDV in tigers,
principally neurological disease (unusual be-
havior, loss of fear, loss of aggression,
blindness, ataxia, and/or seizures), and possi-
bly respiratory and gastrointestinal signs. In
these cases, diagnostic testing (reverse tran-
scription polymerase chain reaction with
sequencing confirmation) of antemortem sam-
ples (whole blood, serum, conjunctival swabs,
and/or urine), and postmortem samples (in-
cluding brain tissue, lymph nodes, lung, and
bladder) should become routine (see Seimon
et al. 2013 for protocols). Demonstration of
supporting histopathology and possibly use of
immunohistochemistry would also be valu-
able. Widespread exposure would indicate the
need to develop population viability models
integrating CDV epidemiology to explore the
impact of infection scenarios and identify
populations at particular risk. Where re-
quired, epidemiological research aimed at
identifying CDV reservoirs for Sumatran
tigers would be essential to inform appropri-
ate mitigation strategies, including the poten-
tial for vaccination of reservoir species or
tigers themselves.
We would like to thank the Directorate of
Biodiversity Conservation (Konservasi Keane-
karagaman Hayati) in Indonesia for endorsing
this work, and the Cornell Feline Health
Center and Cornell Wildlife Health Center
for financial support. N.T. received a Schol-
arship for Research Abroad, Kanchanaphisek
Chalermprakiet Endowment Fund from the
Office of International Affairs and Global
Network, Chulalongkorn University, and the
LETTERS 465
Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Wildlife-Diseases on 30 Mar 2021
Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-useAccess provided by University of Edinburgh
Thailand Research Fund (TRF Senior Schol-
ar, RTA6080012).
LITERATURE CITED
B¨
ohm M, Thompson H, Weir A, Hasted AM, Maxwell
NS, Herrtage ME. 2004. Serum antibody titres to
canine parvovirus, adenovirus and distemper virus in
dogs in the UK which had not been vaccinated for at
least three years. Vet Rec 154:457–464.
Brown JD, Luttrell MP, Berghaus RD, Kistler W, Keeler
SP, Howey A, Wilcox B, Hall J, Niles L, Dey A, et al.
2010. Prevalence of antibodies to type A influenza
virus in wild avian species using two serologic assays.
J Wildl Dis 46:896–911.
Gilbert M, Miquelle DG, Goodrich JM, Reeve R,
Cleaveland S, Matthews L, Joly DO. 2014. Estimat-
ing the potential impact of canine distemper virus on
the Amur tiger population (Panthera tigris altaica)in
Russia. PLoS One 9:e110811.
Gilbert M, Soutyrina SV, Seryodkin IV, Sulikhan N,
Uphyrkina OV, Goncharuk M, Matthews L, Cleave-
land S, Miquelle DG. 2015. Canine distemper virus
as a threat to wild tigers in Russia and across their
range. Integr Zool 10:329–343.
Gilbert M, Sulikhan N, Uphyrkina O, Goncharuk M,
Kerley L, Hernandez Castro E, Reeve R, Seimon T,
McAloose D, Seryodkin IV, et al. 2020. Distemper,
extinction, and vaccination of the Amur tiger. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:31954–31962.
Greene CE, Appel MJ. 2006. Canine distemper. In:
Infectious diseases of the dog and cat, 2nd Ed., Green
CE, editor. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 25–41.
Linkie M, Wibisono HT, Martyr DJ, Sunarto S. 2008.
Panthera tigris ssp. sumatrae. In: International Union
for Conservation of Nature red list threatened species,
2008:e.T15966A5334836. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/
IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T15966A5334836.en. Ac-
cessed March 2020.
Logan N, McMonagle E, Drew AA, Takahashi E,
McDonald M, Baron MD, Gilbert M, Cleaveland S,
Haydon DT, Hosie MJ, et al. 2016. Efficient
generation of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-pseu-
dotypes bearing morbilliviral glycoproteins and their
use in quantifying virus neutralising antibodies.
Vaccine 34:814–822.
Lorenz RJ, B¨
ogel K. 1973. Methods of calculation. In:
Laboratory techniques in rabies, 3rd Ed., Kaplan
MM, Koprowski H, editors. World Health Organiza-
tion Publications, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 321–335.
Seimon TA, Miquelle DG, Chang TY, Newton AL,
Korotkova I, Ivanchuk G, Lyubchenko E, Tupikov
A, Slabe E, McAloose D. 2013. Canine distemper
virus: An emerging disease in wild endangered Amur
tigers (Panthera tigris altaica). mBio 4:e00410-13.
Wibisono HT, Pusparini W. 2010. Sumatran tiger
(Panthera tigris sumatrae): A review of conservation
status. Integr Zool 5:313–323.
Submitted for publication 4 August 2020.
Accepted 2 November 2020.
466 JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, VOL. 57, NO. 2, APRIL 2021
Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Wildlife-Diseases on 30 Mar 2021
Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-useAccess provided by University of Edinburgh