Content uploaded by Kanishk Yadav
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kanishk Yadav on Mar 26, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
HBRP Publication Page 1-4 2021. All Rights Reserved Page 1
Advancement in Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Volume 4 Issue 1
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624800
Modeling and Finite Element Analysis of Universal Joint
Kanishk Yadav1*, Harshit Jain2
B.Tech. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University,
Shahbad Daulatpur, Rohini, Delhi
*Corresponding Author
E-mail Id:- kanishkyadav_2k18me107@dtu.ac.in
ABSTRACT
A universal joint, also known as a Hooke's joint, is a joint or coupling that connects rigid rods
with angled axes. It's commonly found in rotary motion transmission shafts. It consists of a
cross shaft linking two hinges that are close together and oriented at 90 degrees to each other.
The objective of this project is to design and understand the working of the universal joint.
Also, to determine the stresses, strains and element displacement in the existing design of the
universal joint. If the existing design shows some failure, then suggest a minimum factor of
safety for the joint. In this project, only the static FEA of the universal joint has been performed
by the use of the Fusion 360 software. The simulation was carried out in the Static structural
analysis module in the Fusion.
Keywords:- Universal joint, Autodesk Fusion 360, modelling, static structural analysis, CAD-
Computer Aided Designing, Meshing, FEA- Finite Element Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Universal joints are a part of the power
transmission system. They are commonly
used when there needs to be angular
deviations in the rotating shafts [1]. The
main components of the universal joint as
shown in Figure 2 are:
1. Two fork pins that are connected to the
perpendicular arms of the centre block
2. Pin and collar assembly, which allows
the fork to rotate along the axis of the centre
block.
3. The forks allow the assembly to rotate
along their respective shaft axes thus
transmitting torque.
After a long period of use, the universal
joint can develop faults such as looseness,
wear, and torsional deformation of the
intermediate shaft. It could compromise the
universal joint's protection, which is one of
the most important components of a
vehicle's engine and transmission systems.
[2]
Fig.1:-Dimensions used in designing the universal joint
Fig.2:-Modelling of different parts in Fusion 360
HBRP Publication Page 1-4 2021. All Rights Reserved Page 2
Advancement in Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Volume 4 Issue 1
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624800
MODELING
Fig.3:-Universal joint assembly
Autodesk Fusion 360 was used to build the
universal joint model as shown in Figure 3.
We have used dimensions as shown in
Figure 1 for modelling. Fusion 360 is a
collaborative product creation cloud-based
CAD/CAM platform. It allows for product
concept discovery and iteration, as well as
collaboration within a distributed product
development team. Figure 4 shows the top-
view of our Universal joint assembly.
Rendered image of universal joint is shown
in Figure 5.
Fig.4:- Universal joint assembly top-view Fig.5:- Rendered Image of Universal joint
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
The simulation was carried out in Fusion
360 to observe the stresses and strains
developed on the universal joint by static
structural analysis.
The boundary conditions were given such
that one end of the universal joint was kept
fixed while the other end of the joint was
given a torque of 6400 Nm. The material
used in the analysis of universal joints was
structural steel. The result of Stress
analysis, Strain analysis and Displacement
analysis is shown in Figure 6, 7 and 8
respectively.
Fig.6:- Stress Analysis
HBRP Publication Page 1-4 2021. All Rights Reserved Page 3
Advancement in Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Volume 4 Issue 1
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624800
Fig.7:- Strain Analysis
Fig.8:- Displacement Analysis
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
S. No.
PARAMETERS
VALUES
1
Maximum Stress (Von-mises)
6.132 MPa
2
Maximum Principal stress
(Maximum Tensile stress)
8.945 MPa
3
Minimum Principal Stress
(Maximum compressive stress)
2.717 MPa
4
Maximum shear stress
1.911 MPa
5
Maximum Equivalent strain
4.61 * 10^(-5)
6.
Maximum Principal strain
5.022*10^(-5)
7.
Maximum deformation
0.002435 mm
8.
Recommended factor of safety
15
LITERATURE REVIEW
[3] Mills, control devices, gadgets,
instrumentation, medical and optical
gadgets, arms radio sewing machines,
material hardware, and computer drives all
use universal joints.
When the FEA findings were compared to
the current results, they were found to be
quite similar. As a result, FEA is a feasible
tool for evaluating the stresses and failure
points of a joint.
[4] The stresses which generally develop in
the universal joint because of power
transmission include bending stress in
yoke, shear stresses in yoke, crushing
stresses between pin and hole of yoke,
shearing stress in hole of yoke and bending
stress in spider assembly.
[5] The stresses were obtained by applying
similar boundary conditions as in our paper,
that is keeping one end constrained and
applying torque on the other end. Since the
stresses obtained were well within the yield
HBRP Publication Page 1-4 2021. All Rights Reserved Page 4
Advancement in Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Volume 4 Issue 1
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624800
stresses of the material, hence weight
optimisation approach was also applied to
the transmission yoke
[6] Java, an object-oriented and high-level
programming language, is used to measure
the different stresses in flange coupling
components. This offers an alternative
approach for precisely computing stresses
in a short period of time.
.
[7] A comparison is made between the
existing design and a new design by making
small modifications to the existing design.
In the new design the stresses obtained (i.e.
Von mises stress and shear stress) are
significantly reduced and are evenly
distributed.
CONCLUSION
1. The modelling of the universal joint
was carried out in Fusion 360 to better
understand its design, working and the
failure points.
2. From the simulation, it was observed
that considerable compressive stresses
were induced at the point of contact
between the fork pin and the fork
which causes premature wearing of the
fork pin, resulting in failure of the
universal joint.
3. High amounts of stresses were also
observed at the intersection of the
centre block, which could also result in
failure of the universal joint.
4. The factor of safety obtained by the
FEA software for the joint was 15.
5. The Von-mises Stress and maximum
shear stress were found to be 6.13 MPa
and 8.94 MPa respectively.
6. The part was found to be safe under
given load conditions
REFERENCES
1. Vesali, F., Rezvani, M. A., & Kashfi,
M. (2012). Dynamics of universal
joints, its failures and some
propositions for practically improving
its performance and life
expectancy. Journal of mechanical
science and technology, 26(8), 2439-
2449.
2. An, K., & Wang, W. (2017).
Transmission performance and fault
analysis of a vehicle universal
joint. Advances in Mechanical
Engineering, 9(5),
1687814017707478.
3. Arora, R. Modeling and Failure
Analysis of Universal Joint using
ANSYS.
4. Mahajan, S., Khamankar, S.,D. Finite
Element Analysis of Universal Joint.
Journal of Emerging Technologies and
Innovative Research. 2349-5162.
5. Kolekar, D., Kalje, A., Kulkarni, S.
Design, Development and Structural
Analysis of Universal joint.
International Journal of Advanced
Engineering Research and Studies.
2249–8974
6. Vardhan, D. H., HariPrasad, M., Rafi,
D. M., & Ravuri, M. Java for
Mechanical Design Computation:
Dimensions of the Various Flange
Couplings.
7. Shah, P., & Patil, A. (2016). Modeling
and FEA of universal coupling of an
automobile truck. International
Journal for Innovative Research in
Science and Technology, 3(2), 131-6.
Cite as
Kanishk Yadav, & Harshit Jain. (2021).
Modeling and Finite Element Analysis of
Universal Joint. Advancement in
Mechanical Engineering and
Technology, 4(1), 1–4.
http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624800