ArticlePublisher preview available

Assessing and Implementing a Sustainable Holistic Planning System

University of California Press
Case Studies in the Environment
Authors:
  • Carsey School of Public Policy - Univ. of New Hampshire
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

In 2019, the New York Olympic Region received the first Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Communities Certification (gold) for a rural multi-jurisdictional region comprised of Lake Placid Village, North Elba Town, the Olympic Regional Development Authority, and the Lake Placid School System. Much of the work involved in this initiative was executed by 14 undergraduate students and two faculty members from Clarkson University working in partnership with the U.S. Green Building Council, and four local jurisdictions. The endeavor was successful and unique in several facets. First, it provided an experiential project-based education in the application of a sustainable holistic planning system, LEED for Communities/Cities. Second, it demonstrates the value of a university collaboration with a rural region and its communities. Third, it developed the first rural regional model for smart community planning that integrated multiple jurisdictions and stakeholders. Finally, it provides a replicable template for implementation and operation by other communities with institutions of higher learning. A variety of challenges remain, however, for emerging sustainable holistic planning systems in metrics development, civic and stakeholder engagement, determination of efficacy, and implementation optimization. Readers will emerge with an improved understanding of sustainable holistic planning systems, knowledge of multi-jurisdictional planning concerns in sustainability metrics, and insight into implementation of these systems as a pedagogical tool and partnership mechanism.
This content is subject to copyright.
ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Assessing and Implementing a Sustainable Holistic Planning System:
LEED for Communities and the New York Olympic Region
ERIK C. BACKUS
1
AND STEPHEN BIRD
2
1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA
2
Institute of Sustainable Environment & Humanities and Social Sciences, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA
Email: sbird@clarkson.edu
ABSTRACT In 2019, the New York Olympic Region received the first Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEED) for Communities Certification (gold) for a rural multi-jurisdictional region comprised of Lake Placid Village, North
Elba Town, the Olympic Regional Development Authority, and the Lake Placid School System. Much of the work involved
in this initiative was executed by 14 undergraduate students and two faculty members from Clarkson University working
in partnership with the U.S. Green Building Council, and four local jurisdictions. The endeavor was successful and unique
in several facets. First, it provided an experiential project-based education in the application of a sustainable holistic
planning system, LEED for Communities/Cities.Second, it demonstrates the value of a university collaboration with a rural
region and its communities. Third, it developed the first rural regional model for smart community planning that
integrated multiple jurisdictions and stakeholders. Finally, it provides a replicable template for implementation and
operation by other communities with institutions of higher learning. A variety of challenges remain, however, for
emerging sustainable holistic planning systems in metrics development, civic and stakeholder engagement,
determination of efficacy, and implementation optimization. Readers will emerge with an improved understanding of
sustainable holistic planning systems, knowledge of multi-jurisdictional planning concerns in sustainability metrics, and
insight into implementation of these systems as a pedagogical tool and partnership mechanism.
KEYWORDS sustainability, rural planning, participatory planning, metrics-based planning
INTRODUCTION
In September 2019, the New York Olympic Region,
a partnership of four jurisdictional entities, was awarded
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
for Communities (LFC) Gold certification in a first-of-
its-kind attempt. The project was unique given its focus
on the design and implementation of “smart” community
planning (a “sustainable holistic planning system” or
SHPS) in a rural regional context. Performed via a univer-
sity–community collaboration, students determined sys-
tem metrics and goals under the guidance of two primary
faculty and other contributing professors. This form of
action-learning meant that students received a unique
pedagogical experience in sparking “real-world” outcomes.
The rural regional context created significant chal-
lenges for the development of a sophisticated metric-
based sustainability planning system like LFC. Rural com-
munities often lack human and economic resources for
implementation and operation (Frank & Hibbard, 2017,
p. 304). They also have unique environmental contexts
that differ extensively from urban areas, greater sociode-
mographic challenges, and fundamentally different eco-
nomic systems (Frank & Hibbard, 2017,p.301). To
complicate the process further, the New York Olympic
Region is actually a multi-stakeholder partnership that
includes the following:
two governments (the Village of Lake Placid and
the overlapping Town of North Elba),
one school district whose jurisdiction extends
beyond that of the Village and the Town (Lake
Placid Central School District), and
1
Case Studies in the Environment,2021, pps. 120. electronic ISSN 2473-9510.©2021 by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press’s Reprints and Permissions
web page, www.ucpress.edu/journals.php?p¼reprints. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2021.1245219.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have been widely promoted as a promising means of resolving conflicts over natural resources, first in developed countries and, more recently, as a global good practice. However, many MSPs have been implemented in an unfavourable context — primarily of social inequities — and have not met initial high expectations. The article analyzes the challenges MSPs face in an unfavourable context, and identifies five main issues: The analysis is mainly based on two case studies of MSPs set up under inauspicious conditions. The first focuses on water user associations in South Africa, the second on a negotiation platform set up to resolve conflicts over a water and sanitation project in Bolivia. It is argued that MSPs should be seen less as an ideal communication process, and more as a negotiation process — always imperfect — but where positive outcomes may nevertheless outweigh negative ones, if and when the above-mentioned issues are adequately taken into account.
Article
Rural regions and their communities are principal locations for a range of crucial planning issues, yet the practice of rural planning has remained at the margins. In response to growing interest, we explored the current state and future possibilities of rural planning by conducting interviews with ten highly experienced US and Canadian rural specialists. Inductive analysis of their responses, which we supplemented with relevant literature, yielded contemporary definitions of “rural” and “rural planning and development.” The study highlights the major rural planning challenges, and opportunities in terms of “context-appropriate” practices attuned to rural communities and regions, globalization, and multilevel governance.
Article
China is pursuing the development of low-carbon eco-cities to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases emissions; however, it is unclear what constitutes a low-carbon eco-city and how to evaluate it. The eco and low-carbon indicator tool for evaluating cities (ELITE cities) was developed by researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in 2012 to evaluate cities' performance by comparing them against benchmark performance goals as well as rank them against other cities in China. ELITE cities measures progress on 33 key indicators selected to represent priority issues within eight primary categories. An excel-based tool was then developed to package the key indicators, indicator benchmarks, explanation of indicators, point calculation functions and transparency-oriented data recording instructions. ELITE cities could be a useful and effective tool for local city government in defining the broad outlines of a low-carbon eco-city and assessing the progress of cities' efforts towards this goal. ELITE cities can also be used by higher-level governments to assess city performance and discern best practices. This paper explains the general framework of the ELITE cities tool, the methods by which the indicators and indicator benchmarks were established, and a detailed guide on tool applications.
Article
A “new civic regionalism” – based on participatory, inclusive and partnership models of governance – has recently been rolled out in California to tackle the challenges of urban growth, planning and economic development across the State's diverse metropolitan and rural regions. Backed by non-profits and private foundations, California's New Regionalism has been packaged as a flexible and responsive grassroots governance initiative, which is designed to circumnavigate State and local government. Its proponents have been influenced by New Regionalist ideas and practices circulating nationally and internationally. Despite this, our explanation for the rise of the New Regionalism in California is not grounded in these wider theoretical and policy developments; nor do we see it as the outcome of a “new politics of scale” framed around the region. Instead, California's newest regionalism is part of a much longer-standing social movement spearheaded by large-scale business interests and directed at reorganizing local and State government powers particularly in urban regions. This regional reform movement has sought to rationalize land use and environmental planning, coordinate infrastructure, and make government more fiscally efficient and responsive to growth. Over the longer term, its efforts have been undermined by the fiscal fallout of the property tax revolt, Proposition 13. Our analysis calls into question some of the claims in the literature on state rescaling and suggests the value of collapsing the conceptual distinction made between new spaces of political regionalism and regional economic spaces.
Article
The modern environmental management literature stresses the need for community involvement to identify indicators to monitor progress towards sustainable development and environmental management goals. The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of participatory processes on sustainability indicator identification and environmental management in three disparate case studies. The first is a process of developing partnerships between First Nations communities, environmental groups, and forestry companies to resolve conflicts over forest management in Western Canada. The second describes a situation in Botswana where local pastoral communities worked with development researchers to reduce desertification. The third case study details an on-going government led process of developing sustainability indicators in Guernsey, UK, that was designed to monitor the environmental, social, and economic impacts of changes in the economy. The comparative assessment between case studies allows us to draw three primary conclusions. (1) The identification and collection of sustainability indicators not only provide valuable databases for making management decisions, but the process of engaging people to select indicators also provides an opportunity for community empowerment that conventional development approaches have failed to provide. (2) Multi-stakeholder processes must formally feed into decision-making forums or they risk being viewed as irrelevant by policy-makers and stakeholders. (3) Since ecological boundaries rarely meet up with political jurisdictions, it is necessary to be flexible when choosing the scale at which monitoring and decision-making occurs. This requires an awareness of major environmental pathways that run through landscapes to understand how seemingly remote areas may be connected in ways that are not immediately apparent.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
  • Eric Mackres
Eric Mackres, et al. "2013 City Energy Efficiency Scorecard," American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, September 2013
Building Council, LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development rating system
  • U S Leed
  • Green
LEED ND U.S. Green Building Council, LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development rating system, July 2014. Retrieved from http:// www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/ LEED%20v4%20ND_07.01.14_current. pdf USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council)
Energy Efficiency Indicators: Essentials for Policy Making
Energy Efficiency Indicators International Energy Agency. "Energy Efficiency Indicators: Essentials for Policy Making" IEA Publications (2014). Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/
Notice on the insurance of indicators for ecological county, ecological city, and ecological province
  • Eco-City
Eco-city(MEP) indicators Ministry of Environmental Protection (2007). Notice on the insurance of indicators for ecological county, ecological city, and ecological province. Retrieved from Chinese website http:// sts.mep.gov.cn/stsfcj/ China's Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP)