ArticlePublisher preview available

Horses are sensitive to baby talk: pet-directed speech facilitates communication with humans in a pointing task and during grooming

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Pet-directed speech (PDS) is a type of speech humans spontaneously use with their companion animals. It is very similar to speech commonly used when talking to babies. A survey on social media showed that 92.7% of the respondents used PDS with their horse, but only 44.4% thought that their horse was sensitive to it, and the others did not know or doubted its efficacy. We, therefore, decided to test the impact of PDS on two tasks. During a grooming task that consisted of the experimenter scratching the horse with their hand, the horses (n = 20) carried out significantly more mutual grooming gestures toward the experimenter, looked at the person more, and moved less when spoken to with PDS than with Adult-directed speech (ADS). During a pointing task in which the experimenter pointed at the location of a reward with their finger, horses who had been spoken to with PDS (n = 10) found the food significantly more often than chance, which was not the case when horses were spoken to with ADS (n = 10). These results thus indicate that horses, like certain non-human primates and dogs are sensitive to PDS. PDS could thus foster communication between people and horses during everyday interactions.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Animal Cognition (2021) 24:999–1006
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01487-3
ORIGINAL PAPER
Horses are sensitive tobaby talk: pet‑directed speech facilitates
communication withhumans inapointing task andduringgrooming
LéaLansade1 · MilénaTrösch1· CélineParias1· AliceBlanchard1· ElodieGorosurreta1· LudovicCalandreau1
Received: 4 December 2020 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 February 2021 / Published online: 18 March 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Pet-directed speech (PDS) is a type of speech humans spontaneously use with their companion animals. It is very similar to
speech commonly used when talking to babies. A survey on social media showed that 92.7% of the respondents used PDS
with their horse, but only 44.4% thought that their horse was sensitive to it, and the others did not know or doubted its efficacy.
We, therefore, decided to test the impact of PDS on two tasks. During a grooming task that consisted of the experimenter
scratching the horse with their hand, the horses (n=20) carried out significantly more mutual grooming gestures toward the
experimenter, looked at the person more, and moved less when spoken to with PDS than with Adult-directed speech (ADS).
During a pointing task in which the experimenter pointed at the location of a reward with their finger, horses who had been
spoken to with PDS (n=10) found the food significantly more often than chance, which was not the case when horses were
spoken to with ADS (n=10). These results thus indicate that horses, like certain non-human primates and dogs are sensitive
to PDS. PDS could thus foster communication between people and horses during everyday interactions.
Keywords Motherese· Infant-directed speech· Dog-directed speech· Emotion· Positive affect
Introduction
Pet-directed speech (PDS) is a type of speech humans spon-
taneously use with their companion animals. According to
a survey posted on social media, 92.7% of the respondents
used PDS with their horses (see SI). PDS is characterized by
a high-pitched voice, a wide pitch range, slow rate, simple
syntax and semantics, and high repetition of words com-
pared to Adult-directed speech -ADS- (Ben-Aderet etal.
2017; Benjamin and Slocombe 2018; Jeannin etal. 2017;
Lesch etal. 2019). In this way, it is similar to speech used
with babies commonly called “baby talk”, “fatherese”,
“motherese” or “Infant-directed speech” (IDS) and which
is known to convey speaker affect and capture the infant’s
attention (review: Saint-Georges etal. 2013). These types
of speech contain a positive emotional valence compared to
ADS which is more neutral (Singh etal. 2002).
Other than humans, several species appear to be sensitive
to this kind of speech. PDS enables dogs’ attention to be
attracted (Ben-Aderet etal. 2017) and kept for longer than
ADS (Jeannin etal. 2017). PDS also appears to encourage
referential communication demonstrated in a pointing task
in which dogs searched longer for food indicated by pointing
in an empty location when the experimenter spoke in a high-
pitched voice than in a low-pitched imperative voice (Schei-
der etal. 2011). PDS also fosters human-animal relations as
dogs interacted more with an experimenter who had previ-
ously used PDS rather than ADS (Benjamin and Slocombe
2018). In addition, effects on memory have been reported in
infant rhesus macaques, which after exposure to PDS during
the encoding of visual information show improved long-term
memory performance (Slonecker etal. 2018).
In horses, no experiments have tested the impact of PDS.
And in the survey cited above, only 44.4% of the respondents
thought that their horse was sensitive to it (17.4% thought
that it was not and 38.2% did not know, see SI). However,
we know that this species is highly sensitive to our emotions,
and in particular positive emotions, a key aspect of PDS.
They are capable of cross-modal recognition of human joy,
in associating a joyful voice with the corresponding facial
expression (Nakamura etal. 2018; Trösch etal. 2019a).
Moreover, when they hear joy expressed by a human, their
heart rate decreases, and they are more relaxed than when
* Léa Lansade
lea.lansade@inrae.fr
1 PRC, INRAE, CNRS, IFCE, University Tours,
37380Nouzilly, France
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4863277 P r e p r i n t n o t p e e r r e v i e w e d human, making humans more relevant and secure for the horses (Payne et al., 2016;Lansade et al., 2021). We observed behaviors related to increased proximity to the human in a fear-inducing situation, which was independent of the type of bond (familiar or unfamiliar) the handler had with the horse, consistent with the results of Hartmann et al. (2022) and Ijichi et al. (2018). ...
... Horses in the experimental group exhibited less expected behavior when investigating the fearinducing situation. During the application of the technique, these horses investigated the fear-inducing situation less, which is consistent with the idea that the appetitive technique exclusively directs their attention toward the handler, disregarding threatening stimuli (Payne et al., 2016;Lansade et al., 2021). However, it was observed that the experimental group significantly increased their curiosity towards the fear-inducing situation in the post-test. ...
... A própria linguagem u lizada por alguns proprietários para lidar com seus animais de es mação, com alteração do mbre, u lização de diminu vos, usada também por alguns para interagir com bebês humanos, é fator de promoção de relações de qualidade. Em um estudo realizado sobre o tema, pesquisadores concluíram que os cavalos que eram tratados com esse es mulo demonstraram mais atenção, olharam mais para a pessoa que se comunicava desta forma e se moveram menos durante uma a vidade que consis a em coçar os animais com os dedos (Lansade et al., 2021). A promoção reiterada de boas relações pode levar, ainda, à criação de memórias posi vas em cavalos, é o que aponta o estudo no qual foram avaliados cavalos treinados com reforço posi vo, que consis a em recompensa alimentar, e cavalos que não recebiam recompensa (Sankey et al., 2010a). ...
... Contudo, a raiva humana infl uencia a percepção dos cavalos sob outros aspectos. Lansade et al. (2021) iden fi caram que, por meio da fala dirigida a animais de es mação, cavalos responderam com mais atenção, calma e realizaram com mais efi ciência uma tarefa que consis a em encontrar comida. Em pesquisa sobre a reação dos equinos diante da vocalização agressiva e posi va, cavalos fi caram paralisados e aumentaram o comportamento de vigilância ao ouvirem vocalizações não verbais de rosnados humanos que evidenciavam raiva (Smith et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
A ancestralidade dos métodos, das técnicas e dos equipamentos, empregados na equitação é alvo de preocupação para os adeptos do bem-estar animal. Normalmente, quando buscadas na literatura referências antigas, elas estão em desacordo com esta temática. Xenofonte, criticado e reverenciado por muitos, foi o célebre autor de um dos primeiros tratados sobre equitação que se tem notícia na história. Em sua obra intitulada Peri Hippikes, Xenofonte abordou variados temas relacionados ao cavalo, porém revelou uma perspectiva já com destaque para boas relações humano-cavalo, mais comum hoje em dia do que em um período em que essas relações eram bastante violentas e normatizadas. Neste trabalho, foram comparadas sete passagens de sua obra, com foco na temática do treinamento, com a literatura científica contemporânea, discutindo se Xenofonte estava correto ou incorreto em suas afirmações, as quais têm como fundamento conceitos de bem-estar animal nas relações humano-cavalos.
... These studies have shown that it is possible to reliably evaluate individual differences in horse behaviour, and there have been discussions about potential applications of this knowledge (Mills 1998). Horse behaviour toward groomers and mane grooming is a type of interaction with humans that can vary based on individual temperament and past experiences (Lansade et al. 2021;Merkies and Franzin 2021). Mane grooming involves combing, detangling, and styling the mane, which is the long hair along the top of the horse's neck. ...
Article
Full-text available
The domestication and selective breeding of horses for various purposes have led to the emergence of distinct horse breeds, often associated with specific physical traits and behavioral tendencies. Understanding individual differences in horse behavior, particularly during interactions with humans, is essential for promoting positive experiences and welfare. Mane grooming, a common human-horse interaction, provides valuable insights into horse emotional responses and preferences. This study investigates the behaviors of seven distinct horse breeds during mane grooming sessions through real-world observations. It aims to gain insights into horses' emotional responses, focusing on approach and avoidance behaviors, and explores potential influences on their reactions towards grooming, such as gender, mane direction, and breed characteristics. Results reveal personality differences among the seven horse breeds, with only 10.28% exhibiting aggressive behaviors during grooming. Mane direction in horses is primarily determined by genetics, with most having left or right manes. Some variations were observed among breeds, but differences were not substantial. Overall, this research highlights the importance of considering individual and breed-specific traits in mane grooming practices to enhance horse welfare and strengthen the human-horse bond.
Article
Bien qu’exprimées comme telles, les « relations familiales » entre humains et animaux au sein d’élevages ont été délaissées par la sociologie et l’anthropologie. À partir d’ethnographies d’élevages de chevaux de trait en France, cet article décrit comment éleveurs et chevaux font famille. En sortant du paradigme de la production, apparaissent des références identitaires partagées par les membres de l’élevage ainsi qu’un concernement des éleveurs qui s’exprime dans le soin, donnant à voir des « faire-famille » multispécifiques.
Article
Full-text available
A key question in the field of animal cognition is how animals comprehend their physical world. Object permanence is one of the fundamental features of physical cognition. It is the ability to reason about hidden objects and to mentally reconstruct their invisible displacements. This cognitive skill has been studied in a wide range of species but never directly in the horse (Equus caballus). In this study, we therefore assessed the understanding of visible and invisible displacements in adult Welsh mares in two complementary experiments, using different horses. In experiment 1, visible displacement was investigated using two tasks adapted from the Uzgiris and Hunt scale 1. Invisible displacement was assessed using a transposition task, in which food was first hidden in one of two containers and the location of the containers was then switched. In experiment 2, we further investigated horses’ understanding of visible and invisible displacements using an easier procedure designed to avoid potentially confounding factors. In both experiments, horses successfully completed the tasks involving visible displacement with two or three possible hiding places. However, in both experiments, horses failed the transposition tasks, suggesting that they may not be able to track the displacement of an object that is not directly perceived (i.e., invisible displacement). These results bring new insights into object permanence in horses and how they represent their physical world.
Article
Full-text available
Recent studies have demonstrated that horses can recognize humans based simply on visual information. However, none of these studies have investigated whether this involves the recognition of the face itself, or simply identifying people from non-complex external clues, such as hair color. To go beyond this we wanted to know whether certain features of the face were indispensable for this recognition (e.g., colors, hair or eyes). The 11 horses in this study had previously learned to identify four unfamiliar faces (portrait view and in color) presented repeatedly on a screen. We thus assessed whether they were able to identify these same faces spontaneously when they were presented in four other conditions: profile view, black and white, eyes hidden, changed hairstyle. The horses’ performances remained higher than chance level for all the conditions. In a choice test under real conditions, they then approached the people whose face they had learned more often than unknown people. In conclusion, when considering all the individuals studied, no single facial element that we tested appears to be essential for recognition, suggesting holistic processing in face recognition. That means horses do not base their recognition solely on an easy clue such as hair color. They can also link faces from photographs with people in real life, indicating that horses do not process images of faces as simple abstract shapes.
Article
Full-text available
Horses are capable of identifying individual conspecifics based on olfactory, auditory or visual cues. However, this raises the questions of their ability to recognize human beings and on the basis of what cues. This study investigated whether horses could differentiate between a familiar and unfamiliar human from photographs of faces. Eleven horses were trained on a discrimination task using a computer-controlled screen, on which two photographs were presented simultaneously (32 trials/session): touching one was rewarded (S+) and the other not (S−). In the training phase, the S+ faces were of four unfamiliar people which gradually became familiar over the trials. The S− faces were novel for each trial. After the training phase, the faces of the horses’ keepers were presented opposite novel faces to test whether the horses could identify the former spontaneously. A reward was given whichever face was touched to avoid any possible learning effect. Horses touched the faces of keepers significantly more than chance, whether it was their current keeper or one they had not seen for six months (t = 3.65; p < 0.004 and t = 6.24; p < 0.0001). Overall, these results show that horses have advanced human face-recognition abilities and a long-term memory of those human faces.
Article
Full-text available
Animals can indirectly gather meaningful information about other individuals by eavesdropping on their third-party interactions. In particular, eavesdropping can be used to indirectly attribute a negative or positive valence to an individual and to adjust one’s future behavior towards that individual. Few studies have focused on this ability in nonhuman animals, especially in nonprimate species. Here, we investigated this ability for the first time in domestic horses (Equus caballus) by projecting videos of positive and negative interactions between an unknown human experimenter (a “positive” experimenter or a “negative” experimenter) and an actor horse. The horses reacted emotionally while watching the videos, expressing behavioral (facial expressions and contact-seeking behavior) and physiological (heart rate) cues of positive emotions while watching the positive video and of negative emotions while watching the negative video. This result shows that the horses perceived the content of the videos and suggests an emotional contagion between the actor horse and the subjects. After the videos were projected, the horses took a choice test, facing the positive and negative experimenters in real life. The horses successfully used the interactions seen in the videos to discriminate between the experimenters. They touched the negative experimenter significantly more, which seems counterintuitive but can be interpreted as an appeasement attempt, based on the existing literature. This result suggests that horses can indirectly attribute a valence to a human experimenter by eavesdropping on a previous third-party interaction with a conspecific.
Article
Full-text available
Dogs and cats use human emotional information directed to an unfamiliar situation to guide their behavior, known as social referencing. It is not clear whether other domestic species show similar socio-cognitive abilities in interacting with humans. We investigated whether horses (n = 46) use human emotional information to adjust their behavior to a novel object and whether the behavior of horses differed depending on breed type. Horses were randomly assigned to one of two groups: an experimenter positioned in the middle of a test arena directed gaze and voice towards the novel object with either (a) a positive or (b) a negative emotional expression. The duration of subjects' position to the experimenter and the object in the arena, frequency of gazing behavior, and physical interactions (with either object or experimenter) were analyzed. Horses in the positive condition spent more time between the experimenter and object compared to horses in the negative condition, indicating less avoidance behavior towards the object. Horses in the negative condition gazed more often towards the object than horses in the positive condition, indicating increased vigilance behavior. Breed types differed in their behavior: thoroughbreds showed less human-directed behavior than warmbloods and ponies. Our results provide evidence that horses use emotional cues from humans to guide their behavior towards novel objects.
Article
Full-text available
Over the last few years, an increasing number of studies have aimed to gain more insight into the field of animal emotions. In particular, it is of interest to determine whether animals can cross-modally categorize the emotions of others. For domestic animals that share a close relationship with humans, we might wonder whether this cross-modal recognition of emotions extends to humans, as well. In this study, we tested whether horses could recognize human emotions and attribute the emotional valence of visual (facial expression) and vocal (non-verbal vocalization) stimuli to the same perceptual category. Two animated pictures of different facial expressions (anger and joy) were simultaneously presented to the horses, while a speaker played an emotional human non-verbal vocalization matching one of the two facial expressions. Horses looked at the picture that was incongruent with the vocalization more, probably because they were intrigued by the paradoxical combination. Moreover, horses reacted in accordance with the valence of the vocalization, both behaviorally and physiologically (heart rate). These results show that horses can cross-modally recognize human emotions and react emotionally to the emotional states of humans, assessed by non-verbal vocalizations.
Article
Full-text available
Companion animal-directed speech (CADS) has previously been investigated in comparison to infant-directed speech and adult-directed speech. To investigate the influence of owner caregiving, attachment pattern, and personality on CADS, we used the Ainsworth strange situation procedure. It allowed us to assess voice source parameters of CADS across different contexts. We extracted speech parameters (voicing duration, voice pitch, pitch range, and jitter) from 53 dog owners recorded during the procedure. We found that owner personality and gender but not caregiving/attachment behavior affect their voice’s pitch, range, and jitter during CADS. Further, we found a differential and context-specific modification of pitch and range, consistent with the idea that pitch communicates affect, whereas range is more of an attention-getting device. This differential usage, and the increased pitch, emphasize and support the parallels described between CADS and infant-directed speech. For the first time, we also show the effect of personality on CADS and lay the basis for including jitter as a potentially useful measure in CADS.
Article
Social animals can gain important benefits by inferring the goals behind the behavior of others. However, this ability has only been investigated in a handful of species outside of primates. In this study, we tested for the first time whether domestic horses can interpret human actions as goal directed. We used the classical “unwilling versus unable” paradigm: an experimenter performed three similar actions that have the same outcome, but the goal of the experimenter differed. In the unwilling condition, the experimenter had no intention to give a piece of food to a horse and moved it out of reach when the horse tried to eat it. In the two unable conditions, the experimenter had the intention to give the food to the horse but was unable to do so, either because there was a physical barrier between them or because of the experimenter’s clumsiness. The horses (n = 21) reacted differently in the three conditions: they showed more interest in the unable conditions, especially in the unable clumsy condition, than in the unwilling condition. These results are similar to results found in primates with the same paradigm and suggest that horses might have taken the experimenter’s goal, or even intentions, into account to adapt their behavior. Hence, our study offers more insights into horse interspecific social cognition towards humans.
Article
Inferring what others witnessed provides important benefits in social contexts, but evidence remains scarce in nonhuman animals. We investigated this ability in domestic horses by testing whether they could discriminate between two experimenters who differed in what they previously witnessed and decide whom to solicit when confronted with an unreachable food source based on that information. First, horses saw food being hidden in a closed bucket (impossible for them to open) in the presence of two experimenters who behaved identically but differed in their attention to the baiting process (the "witness" experimenter faced the bucket, the "non-witness" faced away). Horses were then let free with both experimenters, and their interest towards each (gaze and touch) was measured. They gazed at and touched the witness significantly more than the non-witness (n = 15, gaze: p = 0.004; touch: p = 0.003). These results might suggest that horses inferred the attentional state of the experimenters during the baiting process and used this information to adapt their later behavior. Although further study would be necessary to conclude, our study provides new insight into attentional state attribution in horses and might hint to the existence of precursors of a Theory of Mind in horses.
Article
Care given to animals, such as grooming for horses, can be a source of well-being when carried out correctly. However, it can cause discomfort when badly perceived and lead to potentially dangerous reactions. This study aimed to describe how grooming is conducted in the field, in terms of the horse's emotional state and also rider safety. Our observations carried out on 69 horses in riding centres and sports stables show that grooming produces more negative than positive emotions. Indeed, only 5% of horses showed mutual grooming, approach or relaxed behaviour, whereas four times more horses expressed avoidance and threatening behaviours. These results have consequences for handler safety. Regarding threatening behaviours, nine incidents (a hoof or teeth passing within 10 cm of the rider's body or head) were recorded. Concerning riders, 100% behaved in a risky way at least once: passing behind or under the head of the horse without keeping it in the field of view (97%) or squatting by its feet (42%). On average, riders carried out 6.7 + 0.49 dangerous behaviours per session, and sometimes up to 19. Moreover, only 7% of them wore a hard hat when preparing their horse, while the risk of concussion is just as high on foot as in the saddle. Finally, 88% of them showed posture which was risky for their backs when picking out hooves. Surprisingly, riders’ experience had no effect on the parameters recorded. In particular, horse professionals were just as exposed to risky situations, did not protect their backs, and their horses showed similar levels of defensive behaviours or signs of discomfort as the less experienced riders (P > 0.05). This result is undoubtedly linked to the lack of importance granted to this practice and little teaching about reading horse signals indicating comfort and discomfort. We hope that our results will make riders aware of how important grooming is for the horse's welfare as much as for their own health and safety.