A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Spirituality in Clinical Practice
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Conceptual and Clinical Implications of a “Haunted People Syndrome”
Brian Laythe
1
, James Houran
2, 3
, Neil Dagnall
4
, and Ken Drinkwater
4
1
Institute for the Study of Religious and Anomalous Experience, Charlestown, Indiana,
United States
2
Laboratory for Statistics and Computation, ISLA—Instituto Politécnico de Gestão e Tecnologia
3
Integrated Knowledge Systems, Dallas, Texas, United States
4
Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University
Evidence suggests that subjective and objective anomalies associated with ghostly
episodes form a unidimensional Rasch scale and that these interconnected “signs or
symptoms”arguably describe a syndrome model. This view predicts that symptom
perception—that is, the phenomenology of these anomalous episodes—can be markedly
skewed by an experient’s psychological set. This is impacted, in turn, by psychosocial
variables that affect attentional, perceptual, and interpretational processes. Therefore, we
present an overview that discusses how (a) Belief in the Paranormal, (b) Religious
Ideology, (c) Ideological Practice, (d) Social Desirability, (e) Latency, and (f) Environ-
mental Setting ostensibly influence the contents or interpretations of accounts. These
experiential details are similarly expected to reveal insights into the psychodynamics
being expressed or contextualized via these narratives. Future research in this area should
help to validate and clarify the proposed syndrome model, as well as explore which
nuances in the phenomenology of ghostly episodes reflect idiosyncrasies of experients’
psychological set versus the nature of the core phenomenon itself.
Keywords: phenomenology, syndrome, symptom perception, systems theory,
transliminality
We agree with Bauer’s (2004, p. 645) senti-
ment that the public deserves an accurately
informed response when scientists are posed
questions such as, “What’s going on when peo-
ple report ghosts and haunted houses?”This
issue is not trivial, as surveys show that we are
dealing with an ongoing and widespread behav-
ioral phenomenon (e.g., Chapman University,
2018;Haraldsson, 2011;McClenon, 2012;
Murray & Jones, 2012;Rice, 2003;Ross &
Joshi, 1992;YouGov, 2019). Moreover, these
narratives—as religio-cultural beliefs, shared
stories, or putative experiences—often affect
people in profound and even transformative
ways (Drinkwater et al., 2019;Hill et al.,
2018,2019). For instance, some academic re-
searchers have boldly professed that spontane-
ous cases can be so impressive prima facie that
they serve as indisputable evidence of the para-
normal (e.g., Stokes, 2017a,2017b). Other
times individuals can endure unexpected con-
sequences of these anomalous experiences that
disrupt their normal functioning.
There are many psychosocial and clinical fa-
cets to ghostly perceptions, so we take these
anomalous experiences seriously but not neces-
sarily at face value (Houran, 2017;Houran et al.,
2017). When misunderstood, these experiences
can fundamentally contribute to misdiagnosis
due to arcane content that often resembles posi-
tive symptoms in schizophrenia or schizotypal
personality disorder. In fact, Raybeyron and
Loose (2015) noted that psychiatric clinics exist
This article was published Online First March 18, 2021.
Brian Laythe https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-2253
James Houran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-582X
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed
to Brian Laythe, Institute for the Study of Religious and
Anomalous Experience, 3804 County Rd 160, Charlestown,
IN 47111, United States. Email: blaythe@israenet.org
195
Spirituality in Clinical Practice
© 2021 American Psychological Association 2021, Vol. 8, No. 3, 195–214
ISSN: 2326-4500 https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000251
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.