ArticlePDF Available

Catalyst Twenty-Twenty: Post-Traumatic Growth at Scales of Person, Place and Planet

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Planetary health is a broad multidisciplinary effort that attempts to address what has been described as “Anthropocene Syndrome”—the wicked, interrelated challenges of our time. These include, but are not limited to, grotesque biodiversity losses, climate change, environmental degradation, resource depletion, the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), health inequalities, social injustices, erosion of wisdom and civility, together with the many structural underpinnings of these grand challenges. The ultimate aim of planetary health is flourishing along every link in the person, place and planet continuum. The events of “2020” have illuminated the consequences of “mass trauma” and how sub-threshold anxiety and/or depressive symptoms erase the rigid lines between mental “health” and mental “disorders”, and unmasked the systemic forms of injustice, discrimination, and oppression that have too often escaped discourse. Here, we query the ways in which post-traumatic growth research might inform the larger planetary health community, especially in the context of a global pandemic, broadening socioeconomic inequalities, a worsening climate crisis, and the rise of political authoritarianism. The available research would suggest that “2020” fulfills the trauma criteria of having a “seismic impact on the assumptive world”, and as such, provides fertile ground for post-traumatic growth. Among the many potential positive changes that might occur in response to trauma, we focus on the value of new awareness, perspective and greater wisdom.
Content may be subject to copyright.
challenges
Viewpoint
Catalyst Twenty-Twenty: Post-Traumatic Growth at Scales of
Person, Place and Planet
Alan C. Logan 1, Susan H. Berman 1,2, Richard B. Scott 1,2, Brian M. Berman 1,2,3 and Susan L. Prescott 1,2,4,*


Citation: Logan, A.C.; Berman, S.H.;
Scott, R.B.; Berman, B.M.; Prescott,
S.L. Catalyst Twenty-Twenty:
Post-Traumatic Growth at Scales of
Person, Place and Planet. Challenges
2021,12, 9. https://doi.org/
10.3390/challe12010009
Academic Editor: Palmiro Poltronieri
Received: 12 February 2021
Accepted: 9 March 2021
Published: 13 March 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1inVIVO Planetary Health, the Worldwide Universities Network (WUN), Baltimore, MD 21231, USA;
alanxlogan@gmail.com (A.C.L.); sberman@tiih.org (S.H.B.); rscott@tiih.org (R.B.S.);
bberman@tiih.org (B.M.B.)
2The Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore, 1407 Fleet St, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
3Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland
School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
4The ORIGINS Project, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth Children’s Hospital,
15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
*Correspondence: Susan.Prescott@telethonkids.org.au
Abstract:
Planetary health is a broad multidisciplinary effort that attempts to address what has
been described as “Anthropocene Syndrome”—the wicked, interrelated challenges of our time.
These include, but are not limited to, grotesque biodiversity losses, climate change, environmental
degradation, resource depletion, the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), health
inequalities, social injustices, erosion of wisdom and civility, together with the many structural
underpinnings of these grand challenges. The ultimate aim of planetary health is flourishing along
every link in the person, place and planet continuum. The events of “2020” have illuminated the
consequences of “mass trauma” and how sub-threshold anxiety and/or depressive symptoms erase
the rigid lines between mental “health” and mental “disorders”, and unmasked the systemic forms of
injustice, discrimination, and oppression that have too often escaped discourse. Here, we query the
ways in which post-traumatic growth research might inform the larger planetary health community,
especially in the context of a global pandemic, broadening socioeconomic inequalities, a worsening
climate crisis, and the rise of political authoritarianism. The available research would suggest that
“2020” fulfills the trauma criteria of having a “seismic impact on the assumptive world”, and as
such, provides fertile ground for post-traumatic growth. Among the many potential positive changes
that might occur in response to trauma, we focus on the value of new awareness, perspective and
greater wisdom.
Keywords:
post-traumatic growth; planetary health; wisdom; self-distancing; awareness; mindful-
ness; COVID-19; non-communicable diseases (NCDs); biodiversity losses; climate change; environ-
mental degradation; flourishing; positive contagion; mental health
1. Introduction
With my barn burned down, nothing obstructs my view of the moon overhead” Mizuta
Masahide, Japanese poet (1657–1723).
The quote above is oft-used in the growing body of literature within the field of
post-traumatic growth—despite his storehouse being destroyed by fire, Masahide was
able to see things from a new perspective, and identify at least one source of awe and
wonder that was previously concealed from view. Masahide’s ability to process a traumatic
event, in a way that might ultimately (over time) lead to positive change, is at the heart
of contemporary post-traumatic growth research. In particular, post-traumatic growth is
characterized perceived positive change in the areas of personal strength, appreciation of
life, interpersonal functioning, spiritual change, and greater awareness of new possibilities
in life.
Challenges 2021,12, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe12010009 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/challenges
Challenges 2021,12, 9 2 of 14
Here, in our Viewpoint paper, we query the ways in which post-traumatic growth
research might inform the larger planetary health community, especially in the context
of a global pandemic, broadening socioeconomic inequalities, a worsening climate crisis,
and the rise of political authoritarianism. The events of “2020” have erased the rigid
lines between mental health and mental disorder, illuminating the consequences of sub-
threshold (anxiety and/or depressive) symptoms, “mass trauma” and systemic forms
of injustice, discrimination, and oppression that have too often escaped discourse [
1
3
].
While experts warn that a mental health crisis is looming ahead—and that message should
be taken seriously [
4
]—there are also signs that the seismic events of 2020 are acting as
a catalyst, increasing awareness of an unhealthy status quo. The COVID-19 crisis has
unmasked long-standing structural disadvantage and various barriers to health that were
previously “hidden” in plain sight [5].
At the outset, we underscore that, in the medical and scientific literature, “2020”
has become shorthand for “a year to remember” [
6
10
] (Figure 1). Obviously, the direct
pathological threat of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is central to the 2020 moniker, but it was
also a year that witnessed numerous (oft-related) seismic events—global protests against
racial injustice [
11
], crisis-level spread of dis/misinformation [
12
], the rise of political
authoritarianism [
13
], unprecedented wildfires in Australia [
14
], further reports that US life
expectancy is declining (after decades of gain) [
15
,
16
], and massive wealth accumulation
among a sliver of the global population [
17
] while precariousness and food and housing
insecurity increased [
18
20
]. At the individual level, seismic events can promote growth.
It is our contention that the mass trauma associated with 2020 might also allow for large
scale post-traumatic growth, a re-appraisal of values, awareness of new possibilities, and
increased wisdom (Figure 2)—to “see the Moon overhead” and rebuild a better, more
sustainable barn.
Challenges 2021, 12, x 2 of 14
Here, in our Viewpoint paper, we query the ways in which post-traumatic growth
research might inform the larger planetary health community, especially in the context of
a global pandemic, broadening socioeconomic inequalities, a worsening climate crisis,
and the rise of political authoritarianism. The events of “2020” have erased the rigid lines
between mental health and mental disorder, illuminating the consequences of sub-thresh-
old (anxiety and/or depressive) symptoms, “mass trauma” and systemic forms of injus-
tice, discrimination, and oppression that have too often escaped discourse [1–3]. While
experts warn that a mental health crisis is looming ahead—and that message should be
taken seriously [4]—there are also signs that the seismic events of 2020 are acting as a
catalyst, increasing awareness of an unhealthy status quo. The COVID-19 crisis has un-
masked long-standing structural disadvantage and various barriers to health that were
previously “hidden” in plain sight [5].
At the outset, we underscore that, in the medical and scientific literature, “2020” has
become shorthand for “a year to remember” [6–10] (Figure 1). Obviously, the direct patho-
logical threat of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is central to the 2020 moniker, but it was also a year
that witnessed numerous (oft-related) seismic events—global protests against racial injus-
tice [11], crisis-level spread of dis/misinformation [12], the rise of political authoritarian-
ism [13], unprecedented wildfires in Australia [14], further reports that US life expectancy
is declining (after decades of gain) [15,16], and massive wealth accumulation among a
sliver of the global population [17] while precariousness and food and housing insecurity
increased [18–20]. At the individual level, seismic events can promote growth. It is our
contention that the mass trauma associated with 2020 might also allow for large scale post-
traumatic growth, a re-appraisal of values, awareness of new possibilities, and increased
wisdom (Figure 2)—to “see the Moon overhead” and rebuild a better, more sustainable barn.
Figure 1. A year to remember: 2020 has been a year of numerous seismic events, spanning from the COVID-19 pandemic,
global protests against racial injustice, crisis-level spread of dis/misinformation, the rise of political authoritarianism, cat-
astrophic environmental events, growing disparities in health and life expectancy, and massive wealth accumulation
among the privileged as food and housing insecurity increased further among the disadvantaged. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
Figure 1.
A year to remember: 2020 has been a year of numerous seismic events, spanning from the COVID-19 pandemic,
global protests against racial injustice, crisis-level spread of dis/misinformation, the rise of political authoritarianism,
catastrophic environmental events, growing disparities in health and life expectancy, and massive wealth accumulation
among the privileged as food and housing insecurity increased further among the disadvantaged. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
Challenges 2021,12, 9 3 of 14
Challenges 2021, 12, x 3 of 14
Figure 2. Post Traumatic Growth: The well-recognized positive responses to trauma range from new awareness, wisdom,
meaning, purpose and greater appreciation of life. The aftermath of the “mass trauma” associated with 2020, may therefore
allow opportunities for large scale post-traumatic growth, a re-appraisal of values, higher levels of environmental and
social concern, awareness of new possibilities, and greater shared wisdom. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
2. Post-Traumatic Growth
“The very greatest things—great thoughts, discoveries, inventions—have generally been nur-
tured in hardship, often pondered over in sorrow...if there were nothing to struggle for, there would
be nothing to be achieved” Editors of The Friend magazine, 1866 [21].
Throughout history and across cultures, humans have held onto the idea that trauma
and adversity can lead to positive change. In particular, this notion has been embedded
in religious and philosophical writings, as well as ancient mythology. It was not until the
1990s, with the validation of the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory [22], that a cohesive
area of psychological study began to examine the concept of post-traumatic growth. In
line with the word “struggle” in the quote above, the term post-traumatic growth refers
to “positive psychological change experienced as a result of the struggle with highly chal-
lenging life circumstances” [23].
Post-traumatic growth (henceforth, PTG) research does not minimize the potentially
devastating and far-reaching negative effects of trauma—volumes of research demon-
strate the long-term health consequences of acute and chronic trauma exposure [24–27].
Indeed, the available research shows that PTG coexists with ongoing distress [28], and
although there is evidence of benefit to health and wellbeing (discussed below) [29], PTG
is not a curative of trauma symptoms. Rather, PTG research examines the ways in which
traumatic events become a catalyst for growth, learning and re-evaluation of worldviews.
PTG research extends beyond catastrophic life events (e.g., combat experiences, violent
assault, direct witness to horrifying events) that have been at the historical core of post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) research. In the context of PTG research, the words
trauma, major crisis, and highly stressful events are used interchangeably, with the com-
mon thread being an event(s) acting as a major challenge to individuals—especially if it
challenges the way in which they understood/understand the world and their place in it [23].
As such, and because traumatic events often challenge communities and vast populations,
Figure 2.
Post Traumatic Growth: The well-recognized positive responses to trauma range from new awareness, wisdom,
meaning, purpose and greater appreciation of life. The aftermath of the “mass trauma” associated with 2020, may therefore
allow opportunities for large scale post-traumatic growth, a re-appraisal of values, higher levels of environmental and social
concern, awareness of new possibilities, and greater shared wisdom. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
2. Post-Traumatic Growth
The very greatest things—great thoughts, discoveries, inventions—have generally been
nurtured in hardship, often pondered over in sorrow...if there were nothing to struggle
for, there would be nothing to be achieved” Editors of The Friend magazine, 1866 [
21
].
Throughout history and across cultures, humans have held onto the idea that trauma
and adversity can lead to positive change. In particular, this notion has been embedded
in religious and philosophical writings, as well as ancient mythology. It was not until the
1990s, with the validation of the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory [
22
], that a cohesive area
of psychological study began to examine the concept of post-traumatic growth. In line with
the word “struggle” in the quote above, the term post-traumatic growth refers to “positive
psychological change experienced as a result of the struggle with highly challenging life
circumstances” [23].
Post-traumatic growth (henceforth, PTG) research does not minimize the potentially
devastating and far-reaching negative effects of trauma—volumes of research demonstrate
the long-term health consequences of acute and chronic trauma exposure [
24
27
]. Indeed,
the available research shows that PTG coexists with ongoing distress [
28
], and although
there is evidence of benefit to health and wellbeing (discussed below) [
29
], PTG is not a
curative of trauma symptoms. Rather, PTG research examines the ways in which traumatic
events become a catalyst for growth, learning and re-evaluation of worldviews. PTG
research extends beyond catastrophic life events (e.g., combat experiences, violent assault,
direct witness to horrifying events) that have been at the historical core of posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD) research. In the context of PTG research, the words trauma, major
crisis, and highly stressful events are used interchangeably, with the common thread being
an event(s) acting as a major challenge to individuals—especially if it challenges the way
in which they understood/understand the world and their place in it [
23
]. As such, and
Challenges 2021,12, 9 4 of 14
because traumatic events often challenge communities and vast populations, PTG research
has broad societal implications. In the context of PTG, trauma is certainly a subjective
term, one that may or may not be associated with the marked physiological changes that
are often noted in PTSD; what constitutes ‘traumatic’ in PTG discourse can be a product
of culture and may change over time, but it best described by what it is not—the ‘daily
hassles’ and minor stressors that, although not without negative health consequences, are
a common feature of modern life [30].
While PTG discourse has oft-overlapped with the concept of resiliency (and “hardi-
ness”), optimism and pre-trauma assets/abilities to withstand trauma, it is important to
note that PTG research attempts to understand the “processes people use as they struggle
with the aftermath of trauma to derive meaning, feel wiser, and face uncertain futures with
more confidence” [
22
] (Figure 3). Hence, PTG research emphasizes both the processes and
the outcomes associated with growth. At the same time, PTG cannot be uncoupled from
personality features, available resources, and the larger cultural narratives that surround
an individual or community over time [
31
,
32
]. For example, higher social support, spir-
ituality, optimism, active coping strategies, and purpose in life may predict subsequent
PTG over time [
33
35
]. Since optimism and social support networks can be assets of
affluence [
36
39
], PTG cannot be uncoupled from complex “exposome” discussions—that
is, the total accumulated environmental exposures (both detrimental and beneficial) that
help us understand the response of humans to the total environment over time [40].
Challenges 2021, 12, x 4 of 14
PTG research has broad societal implications. In the context of PTG, trauma is certainly a
subjective term, one that may or may not be associated with the marked physiological
changes that are often noted in PTSD; what constitutes ‘traumatic’ in PTG discourse can
be a product of culture and may change over time, but it best described by what it is not—
the ‘daily hassles’ and minor stressors that, although not without negative health conse-
quences, are a common feature of modern life [30].
While PTG discourse has oft-overlapped with the concept of resiliency (and “hardi-
ness”), optimism and pre-trauma assets/abilities to withstand trauma, it is important to
note that PTG research attempts to understand the “processes people use as they struggle
with the aftermath of trauma to derive meaning, feel wiser, and face uncertain futures
with more confidence” [22] (Figure 3). Hence, PTG research emphasizes both the pro-
cesses and the outcomes associated with growth. At the same time, PTG cannot be uncou-
pled from personality features, available resources, and the larger cultural narratives that
surround an individual or community over time [31,32]. For example, higher social sup-
port, spirituality, optimism, active coping strategies, and purpose in life may predict sub-
sequent PTG over time [33–35]. Since optimism and social support networks can be assets
of affluence [36–39], PTG cannot be uncoupled from complex “exposome” discussions—
that is, the total accumulated environmental exposures (both detrimental and beneficial)
that help us understand the response of humans to the total environment over time [40].
Figure 3. Traumatic events can act as catalysts that accelerate change through new awareness and new opportunities that
might not have occurred (or taken longer). (Image inspired by wisdom of Japanese poet Mizuta Masahide; created by
S.L.P).
The broad interpretation of the word “trauma” and reliance upon cross-sectional
studies with retrospective data collection has been a major limitation within the field of
PTG. The extent to which individuals experience PTG and maintain such growth in a way
that promotes wellbeing and/or physical health over time remains far from clear [41]. Still,
a recent meta-analysis indicates that approximately half of individuals who experienced
traumatic events report moderate-to-high levels of PTG [42]. Whether or not perceived
(vs. actual) PTG is part of a coping process (that is, the “psychological immune system”,
cognitive mechanisms that maintain a sense of well-being during times of adversity and
distress [43]) is a matter of ongoing research [44]; it is not our contention that PTG is a
Figure 3.
Traumatic events can act as catalysts that accelerate change through new awareness and new opportunities that
might not have occurred (or taken longer). (Image inspired by wisdom of Japanese poet Mizuta Masahide; created by S.L.P).
The broad interpretation of the word “trauma” and reliance upon cross-sectional
studies with retrospective data collection has been a major limitation within the field of
PTG. The extent to which individuals experience PTG and maintain such growth in a way
that promotes wellbeing and/or physical health over time remains far from clear [
41
]. Still,
a recent meta-analysis indicates that approximately half of individuals who experienced
traumatic events report moderate-to-high levels of PTG [
42
]. Whether or not perceived
(vs. actual) PTG is part of a coping process (that is, the “psychological immune system”,
cognitive mechanisms that maintain a sense of well-being during times of adversity and
distress [
43
]) is a matter of ongoing research [
44
]; it is not our contention that PTG is
a scientific field wherein all the answers can be found. Rather, we suggest that salient
Challenges 2021,12, 9 5 of 14
portions of the available PTG research might inform the larger networks of planetary health
(Figure 4).
Challenges 2021, 12, x 5 of 14
scientific field wherein all the answers can be found. Rather, we suggest that salient por-
tions of the available PTG research might inform the larger networks of planetary health
(Figure 4).
Figure 4. Challenges that break the status quo can provide new or accelerated opportunities for change. Acute events can
unmask chronic problems that seemed impossible to overcome or may not have even been recognized. The new perspec-
tives and greater awareness that result can create new possibilities and galvanize action. What applies to personal growth
may apply equally at collective scales. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
3. New Awareness and Wisdom
“I want those who follow us to look back on us as wise ancestors, good ancestors
Jonas Salk. 1984 [45].
Among the many potential positive changes that might occur in response to trauma,
new awareness and increased wisdom are central to the growth concept. The new aware-
ness ranges from increased awareness of human potential, existential awareness (meaning
and purpose) and greater appreciation of life [46–48]. The validated Posttraumatic Growth
Inventory (PTGI) includes “New Possibilities” questions such as “New opportunities are
available, which wouldn’t have been otherwise” and “I established a new path for my
life”.
While meaning and purpose in life are often considered to be synonymous, the dis-
tinction is worth noting; experts have concluded that ‘lives may be experienced as mean-
ingful when they are felt to have significance beyond the trivial or momentary, to have
purpose, or to have a coherence that transcends chaos [49]. Thus, meaning in life has three
primary facets—a life with (i) value and significance, (ii) a broader purpose, and (iii) co-
herence as part of a comprehensible whole [50]. Among these facets, purpose in life has
been the subject of robust research. Generally, a high degree of purpose in life is associated
with goals, big picture thinking, and a long view [51]. Higher levels of purpose in life
predicts healthy behaviors [52,53], lower allostatic load (physiological “wear and tear”
Figure 4.
Challenges that break the status quo can provide new or accelerated opportunities for change. Acute events
can unmask chronic problems that seemed impossible to overcome or may not have even been recognized. The new
perspectives and greater awareness that result can create new possibilities and galvanize action. What applies to personal
growth may apply equally at collective scales. (Artwork by S.L.P.).
3. New Awareness and Wisdom
I want those who follow us to look back on us as wise ancestors, good ancestors” Jonas
Salk. 1984 [45].
Among the many potential positive changes that might occur in response to trauma,
new awareness and increased wisdom are central to the growth concept. The new aware-
ness ranges from increased awareness of human potential, existential awareness (meaning
and purpose) and greater appreciation of life [
46
48
]. The validated Posttraumatic Growth
Inventory (PTGI) includes “New Possibilities” questions such as “New opportunities are
available, which wouldn’t have been otherwise” and “I established a new path for my life”.
While meaning and purpose in life are often considered to be synonymous, the
distinction is worth noting; experts have concluded that ‘lives may be experienced as
meaningful when they are felt to have significance beyond the trivial or momentary, to
have purpose, or to have a coherence that transcends chaos [
49
]. Thus, meaning in life
has three primary facets—a life with (i) value and significance, (ii) a broader purpose, and
(iii) coherence as part of a comprehensible whole [
50
]. Among these facets, purpose in
life has been the subject of robust research. Generally, a high degree of purpose in life is
associated with goals, big picture thinking, and a long view [
51
]. Higher levels of purpose
in life predicts healthy behaviors [
52
,
53
], lower allostatic load (physiological “wear and
tear” due to chronic stress) [
54
] and lower non-communicable disease risk [
55
,
56
]. Among
combat veterans with PTSD, lower purpose in life scores are a significant predictor of
Challenges 2021,12, 9 6 of 14
suicidal ideation over time [
57
]. Since the adoption of healthy lifestyle habits also increase
self-reported purpose in life, the overall wellbeing benefits may accrue in a bidirectional
manner [58].
In research settings, wisdom is defined as “morally-grounded excellence in social-
cognitive processing”. Here, moral grounding refers to a set of inter-related aspirational
goals: balance of self, pursuit of truth (vs. dishonesty), and pro-social orientation toward
shared humanity. Excellence in social-cognitive processing refers to the application of
certain forms of meta-cognition to reasoning and problem-solving in situational domains
that have the potential to affect other people. This includes intellectual humility (awareness
of one’s limited knowledge), context-adaptability (pragmatic reasoning, open-mindedness
to change), perspectivism (considering different perspectives and long-term thinking),
dialectical/reflective thinking (balancing and integration of viewpoints, including opposing
perspectives), and epistemic/intellectual humility (e.g., unbiased/accurate thinking, seeing
through illusions, understanding one’s limitations) [
59
]. Validated instruments such as
the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale, the Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale, and the Brief
Wisdom Screening Scale, can capture many of the aforementioned aspects of wisdom,
as well as humor and emotional regulation which are also seen as critical components
of wisdom [
60
]. Like purpose in life, wisdom has also been linked with post-traumatic
growth, enhanced mental health outcomes, subjective wellbeing and quality of life [
61
63
].
Wisdom is specifically associated with a type of self-reflection (when recalling difficult
life experiences) that engages explanatory processing—extracting lessons, insights and
meaning [
64
]. Indeed, post-traumatic increases in wisdom may further facilitate health-
associated variables such as forgiveness, gratitude and spirituality [65].
It is important to note that the experience of PTG does not automatically equate
to wisdom. As stated by experts in the field, “it is inaccurate to assume that all people
who report PTG are also wiser. The degree to which this may be true would depend
on the particular definition of wisdom and the particular type of PTG” [
66
]. Of course,
the academic concept of wisdom is oft-confined to a westernized perspective [
67
,
68
];
although the concept of trauma differs across cultures, PTG has been observed among
diverse cultural groups, with the available research indicating that PTG is a universal
experience [
66
]. More work is needed to tie together non-western conceptions of wisdom
and PTG.
4. Post Twenty-Twenty
Posttraumatic growth is not simply a return to baseline” Richard Tedeschi, Lawrence
Calhoun. 2004.
Thus far, we have outlined some of the salient components of the burgeoning PTG
research. Now, we turn our attention to the ways in which aspects of PTG—most notably
new awareness and wisdom at the individual level—might be elevated on larger scales,
from place (community) to planet. Already, international researchers have reported COVID-
19 related PTG among individuals—including the embracing of new possibilities, openness
to the future, positive spiritual change, greater appreciation of life, identification with larger
humanity, and improved relationships [
69
71
]. In the context of “2020”, this preliminary
research provokes a critical question: how can we “boost” wisdom?
Among the various wisdom-enhancing techniques used by educators, “self-distancing”
is emerging as one of the most effective strategies; this involves adopting a “detached”
or ego-decentered viewpoint while reflecting on past (or imagined future) experiences
of adversity. This process is often described as a “fly on the wall” perspective, with the
reflection using third person language (as opposed to first person, self-immersed reflection).
Self-distancing leads to lower levels of negative affect and physiological reactivity after
reflecting on past events, and reduces emotional reactivity about future stressors [
72
,
73
].
In the context of PTG, people who reflect on everyday adversity from a self-distanced
perspective experienced growth in their positive emotionality [
74
], and several experimen-
tal studies indicate that self-distancing can promote wise reasoning [
75
78
]. Experiments
Challenges 2021,12, 9 7 of 14
demonstrate that cueing people to reason about personally meaningful issues (e.g., Career
prospects for the unemployed during an economic recession; and anticipated societal
changes associated with one’s chosen candidate losing the 2008 U.S. Presidential election)
from a distanced perspective enhances wise reasoning (dialecticism; intellectual humility),
attitudes (cooperation-related attitude assimilation), and behavior (willingness to join a
bipartisan group) [
76
]. While more research is required on the utility of self-distancing in
the context of “2020” trauma, such findings suggest that the techniques may have value in
addressing large-scale, complex, interrelated trauma.
The detachment principle of self-distancing is also a central component of mindful-
ness [
79
]; thus it is unsurprising that mindfulness exercises are also an important part of
teaching interventions that have been shown to promote PTG [80] and wisdom [81,82].
As mentioned earlier, many scholars emphasize the role of emotions in wise behaviors.
As argued by Professor Judith Gluck (see Wisdom, Box 1), who has studied wisdom for
over twenty years, seeing through illusion and self-deception along the path to wise rea-
soning requires emotional awareness, emotion regulation, and empathy [83]. Since moral
grounding is the fulcrum of wisdom, experts have focused in on the emotions that might
underpin the moral grounding of wisdom, including the “self-transcendent” emotions of
compassion, gratitude and awe [
84
]. As self-transcendent emotions are oriented toward
lifting up the wellbeing of others, they offer a tantalizing pathway toward the wisdom
required for post-2020 growth. Indeed, scholars Dacher Keltner and Paul Piff have made
a strong case for awe, already well-known for its ability to amplify humility, scientific
reasoning and pro-social attitudes and behaviors, as the emotion that morally grounds
wisdom [85] (see Awe, Box 2).
Box 1. The Wisdom Mindset.
Dr. Judith Gluck and colleagues (2019) state that wisdom is “deep, personal, experience-based
knowledge about life that is acquired through and goes along with a certain mindset”. The hallmark
of that mindset is “the willingness and ability to take a broad, non-self-centered perspective on life
with the goal of understanding it in all its complexity; [individuals with] this mindset are more
likely than others to learn more about life and accumulate wisdom-related knowledge over time,
and they are more often able to deal with difficult situations wisely”. Dr. Gluck and colleagues
conclude by emphasizing that a greater understanding of how we can foster the wisdom mindset
“may be one of the most crucial questions for humanity at this point” [78].
Box 2. The Power of Awe.
Awe is a positive emotion that is typically provoked by grand stimuli (e.g., viewing scenes of
the Earth from space, vast scenes of breathtaking nature, or childbirth can provoke awe); awe-
provoking stimuli often present with an element of mystery and wonder; a scene or event that
is not immediately understood [
86
,
87
]—perhaps indistinct with what philosophers refer to as
the sublime [
88
]. Awe has been connected to lower systemic inflammation, emotional wellbeing,
increased life satisfaction, mindfulness, increased patience, decreased materialism, and pro-social
and pro-environmental behaviors [
89
92
]. Awe enhances openness to learning, the desire to
innovate and engage in creative pursuits [
89
]. While studies have generally examined short-term
outcomes after awe induction, it has been argued that awe is much more than a ‘fleeting moment’
emotion; rather, it has steady-state properties with much larger, transformative implications to
health and vitality at scales of person, place and planet [
93
]. As stated by expert Kirk Schneider: To
the extent that people are deficient in awe for life, they are much more prone to be embittered, to feel desolate
or numb and to protect their hunger for spiritual connection on quick fixes, whether they be commercial
products or leaders or mass movements” [94].
Preliminary research from China has shown that the magnitude of the COVID-19
pandemic is associated with awe; while vast experiences such as natural disasters can
induce “negative” awe, associated with threat (anxiety, fear), and the pandemic appears no
different in that regard, researchers have found positive awe associated with COVID-19,
including stronger feelings of admiration, inspiration, and optimism. Researchers, in their
Challenges 2021,12, 9 8 of 14
examination of green consumption behaviors, concluded that the positive awe of COVID-
19 stems from the greatness of life, the selfless acts of healthcare heroes, and the collective
heroism displayed by volunteers. Moreover, individuals with pandemic-associated positive
awe had higher levels of environmental and social concern, and that this environmental
concern significantly increased (experimental) green consumption behavior [95].
5. Growth from One, to Many
Everything can be taken [except] one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose
one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way,” Viktor E.
Frankl, 1959 [96].
As mentioned, the bulk of PTG research pertains to the experience of individuals.
At present, we cannot assume that responses to trauma at the individual level, and the
experience of PTG, can be neatly multiplied from person to the group level, and ultimately,
to the global level. To do so would ignore the diverse total lived experiences of individuals
and groups, and the disparate group level ecology (institutions, environment, public health,
etc.) that shape the lived experiences from micro, meso and to macro scales. Individual and
cultural differences will be at play. For example, recent research from Greece indicates that
the relatively stable trait of dispositional optimism is a key driver of COVID-related PTG.
Specifically, dispositional optimism predicts the ability of individuals to draw personal
strength and explore new perspectives in the context of COVID-19 associated PTG [
97
].
While individual level optimism can be malleable and increased through interventions [
98
],
it is important to note that higher levels of optimism and/or lower levels of pessimism
(the absence of pessimism is a health variable distinct from the presence of optimism [
99
])
are linked to socioeconomic advantage [
100
,
101
]. On the other hand, overly optimistic
outlooks can impede realistic expectations about the future, maintain an unhealthy status
quo, and subsequently act as a barrier to health promotion [
102
] and it can also imply
that those who do not take a positive attitude toward disaster are at personal fault. Thus,
our contention that “Twenty-Twenty”-associated PTG might spread across networks and
nations is perhaps, itself, overly optimistic, and is certainly predicated on individual and
cultural differences, including pre/post COVID conditions that might either facilitate or
hinder PTG.
With that major caveat in place, we can point out that there is some evidence that PTG
is “transmissible” to close others, and even to larger groups and social systems [
66
,
103
].
For example, life partners, siblings and/or caregivers of cancer patients or cancer survivors
have reported PTG in various studies [
104
107
]. Related to this research is so-called
vicarious (or secondary) PTG wherein first responders, healthcare workers and/or those
who spend extended time with trauma survivors, experience PTG [
108
111
]. Research
drawn from military, first responder and healthcare professions (where the likelihood
of direct and vicarious exposure to trauma is common) has resulted in organizational
responses that might facilitate PTG [
112
]. The potential for pandemic-related PTG at the
organizational level has already been put forth by leaders in the field of PTSD; citing
examples such as the post-Hurricane Katrina transformation of the New Orleans healthcare
system, experts contend that there is an opportunity to establish a “new normal” in which
organizations are not only restored, but achieve a higher level of functioning as a result
of addressing and learning from a traumatic event [
113
]. Trauma can certainly impact
organizations (e.g., natural disasters, homicide, suicide, fire, massive financial crime,
harassment, discrimination) and, much like individual-level PTG, the pre-trauma assets of
organizations (e.g., a culture of empathy, compassion, support, wisdom) may determine
the extent to which PTG may occur [
112
]; at this point researchers are only beginning to
examine the ‘collective cognitions’, especially by leadership, that might provoke workplace
or organizational PTG [114,115].
Recall, it is not a specific trauma per se that causes growth; rather, it is the struggle
and response to the trauma. History is replete with examples of mass trauma (natural and
human-made catastrophes) leading to the sharing and integration of individual narratives
Challenges 2021,12, 9 9 of 14
into a large-scale whole [
116
,
117
]. In recent years, the survivors of school shootings (and
their parents) in the United States have galvanized a movement, one with a clear sense of
purpose in the efforts toward meaningful, long-overdue policy changes [
118
,
119
]. At the
same time, the experiences of mass trauma uncovers preexisting inequalities and injustice;
this has certainly been the case with COVID-19, where the heaviest burden is shouldered
by disadvantaged individuals and communities [
120
]; disparate responses by government
and organizations to COVID-19 (some ignoring expert public health guidance), and the
ability of certain advantaged individuals (often with occupations easily operable via on-
line services) has challenged the notion that “we are all in this together” [
121
]. Still, even
though the events of “Twenty-Twenty” have not evoked equal levels of trauma throughout
communities and across borders, and many of the Anthropocene’s unhealthy status quo
hallmarks (and its attendant misinformation mess [
12
]) seem as entrenched as ever, the
available PTG research has a place in the discourse of health at scales of person, place
and planet.
While individual PTG is associated with an examination of who the person “is” in
the aftermath of trauma, mass trauma can provoke examination of who “we” are, and
what meaning can be drawn from the trauma. Research shows that traumatic experiences
can enable growth in individuals’ leadership capacity [
112
], which supports the many
historical examples wherein seismic trauma leads to the emergence of previously unknown
citizens who take morally grounded leadership roles [
23
,
122
]. Although times of great
fear have provided a Petri dish for enhanced “in-group” affiliation and the rise of political
authoritarianism, the emergence of wise citizens and leaders can provide an antidote [
123
];
given the human propensity to mimic the behavior of others [
124
], elevating the narratives
of moral exemplars—individuals who have lived their lives in a morally exceptional
manner—may be an important part of the path to promote post-2020 wisdom [125].
6. Conclusions
We have a duty to trumpet the reality of post-traumatic growth, not only to those who
have experienced PTSD or are likely to, but to society as a whole, so that when tragedy
does strike we are prepared to receive its victims with a supportive and knowledgeable
embrace; informed by science, warmed by compassion” Samuel Dickinson, Weill
Cornell Medical College. 2020 [126].
In the aftermath of “2020”, it can be easy to forget that the pre-pandemic world was
already facing wicked, interrelated challenges known as ‘Anthropocene Syndrome’ [
127
].
There was already a mental health crisis, environmental calamities and unprecedented levels
of NCDs. In the wake of “2020”, much has been written on the large-scale mental health
implications of the global pandemic, and rightfully so. Yet, the ever-increasing body of
research under the rubric of PTG may also provide salient, and certainly hopeful, information.
While the general public is very familiar with the term post-traumatic stress disorder,
a much smaller fraction are aware of PTG [
128
]. Perhaps “2020” provides an opportunity
to raise awareness of PTG, and emphasize its components, such as new possibilities, self-
distancing, mindfulness and wisdom. Obviously, there are untold numbers of unanswered
research questions, yet the available research would suggest that “2020” fulfills the trauma
criteria of having a “seismic impact on the assumptive world”, and as such, provides fertile
ground for PTG, and associated wise reasoning.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, data curation, original draft preparation, A.C.L. and
S.L.P.; review editing and project administration, S.H.B., R.B.S. and B.M.B. Art creations by S.L.P. All
authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Challenges 2021,12, 9 10 of 14
Conflicts of Interest:
A.C.L. is the author of trade book “The Greatest Hoax on Earth: Catching Truth
While We Can” (ISBN 9781736197400) published in 2020 on aspects of the media, propaganda and
post-truth. S.H.B., R.B.D., B.M.B. and S.L.P. declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Horesh, D.; Brown, A.D. Traumatic Stress in the Age of COVID-19: A Call to Close Critical Gaps and Adapt to New Realities.
Psychol. Trauma-Us 2020,12, 331–335. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Dong, L.L.; Wang, F.S.; Li, Y.F.; Wei, R.H.; Zhang, J.P. The relationship between resilience,
anxiety and depression among patients with mild symptoms of COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Nurs.
2020
,
29, 4020–4029. [CrossRef]
3.
Fernandez Turienzo, C.; Newburn, M.; Agyepong, A.; Buabeng, R.; Dignam, A.; Abe, C.; Bedward, L.; Rayment-Jones, H.; Silverio,
S.A.; Easter, A.; et al. Addressing inequities in maternal health among women living in communities of social disadvantage and
ethnic diversity. BMC Public Health 2021,21, 176. [CrossRef]
4. Le, K.; Nguyen, M. The psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic severity. Econ. Hum. Biol 2021,41, 100979. [CrossRef]
5.
Team, V.; Manderson, L. How COVID-19 Reveals Structures of Vulnerability. Med. Anthropol.
2020
,39, 671–674. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6. Poppas, A. 2020: A Year to Remember-And From Which to Learn. J. Am. Coll Cardiol 2021,77, 659–660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Eisner, D.A. 2020: An unusual year. J. Gen. Physiol. 2021,153, 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Franklin, C. 2020—A year of changes, challenges and opportunities. J. Exp. Biol. 2021,224 (Pt 1), jeb242155. [CrossRef]
9. Roberts, D.J. 2020: A year we will remember. Transfus Med. 2020,30, 416–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Nauleau, P.; Ralph, H. 2020: A year to remember. EBioMedicine 2021,63, 103185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.
Cipriano, P.F.; Boston-Leary, K.; McMillan, K.; Peterson, C. The US COVID-19 crises: Facts, science and solidarity. Int. Nurs. Rev.
2020,67, 437–444. [CrossRef]
12.
Logan, A.C.; Berman, S.H.; Berman, B.M.; Prescott, S.L. Healing Anthropocene Syndrome: Planetary Health Requires Remediation
of the Toxic Post-Truth Environment. Challenges 2021,12, 1. [CrossRef]
13. Morabia, A. The Fascist Threat. Am. J. Public Health 2021, e1–e2. [CrossRef]
14.
Zhang, Y.; Beggs, P.J.; McGushin, A.; Bambrick, H.; Trueck, S.; Hanigan, I.C.; Morgan, G.G.; Berry, H.L.; Linnenluecke, M.K.;
Johnston, F.H.; et al. The 2020 special report of the MJA-Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Lessons learnt from
Australia’s “Black Summer”. Med. J. Aust. 2020,213, 490–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Mehta, N.K.; Abrams, L.R.; Myrskyla, M. US life expectancy stalls due to cardiovascular disease, not drug deaths. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 2020,117, 6998–7000. [CrossRef]
16. Harper, S.; Riddell, C.A.; King, N.B. Declining Life Expectancy in the United States: Missing the Trees for the Forest. Annu. Rev.
Public Health 2020,42, 2021.
17.
Collins, C. Updates: Billionaire Wealth, US Job Losses and Pandemic Profiteers. Inequality.Org. 26 January 2021. Available
online: https://inequality.org/great-divide/updates-billionaire-pandemic/#:~{}:text=The%20collective%20wealth%20of%20
all,10%20months%20of%20national%20emergency (accessed on 8 February 2021).
18.
Lauren, B.N.; Silver, E.R.; Faye, A.S.; Rogers, A.M.; Woo Baidal, J.A.; Ozanne, E.M.; Hur, C. Predictors of households at risk for
food insecurity in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Nutr. 2021, 1–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.
Gundersen, C.; Hake, M.; Dewey, A.; Engelhard, E. Food Insecurity during COVID-19. 2021, ePub Ahead of Issue. Appl. Econ.
Perspect. Policy 2021,43, 153–161. [CrossRef]
20.
Benfer, E.A.; Vlahov, D.; Long, M.Y.; Walker-Wells, E.; Pottenger, J.L., Jr.; Gonsalves, G.; Keene, D.E. Eviction, Health Inequity, and
the Spread of COVID-19: Housing Policy as a Primary Pandemic Mitigation Strategy. J. Urban. Health
2021
,98, 1–12. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
21. The Editors (Anon). Self-Help. Friend 1866,39, 117–118.
22.
Tedeschi, R.G.; Calhoun, L.G. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J. Trauma Stress
1996,9, 455–471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Tedeschi, R.G.; Calhoun, L.G. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol. Inq.
2004
,15, 1–18.
[CrossRef]
24.
Turner, A.I.; Smyth, N.; Hall, S.J.; Torres, S.J.; Hussein, M.; Jayasinghe, S.U.; Ball, K.; Clow, A.J. Psychological stress reactivity and
future health and disease outcomes: A systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychoneuroendocrinology
2020
,114, 104599.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Coimbra, B.M.; Carvalho, C.M.; Ota, V.K.; Vieira-Fonseca, T.; Bugiga, A.; Mello, A.F.; Mello, M.F.; Belangero, S.I. A systematic
review on the effects of social discrimination on telomere length. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020,120, 104766. [CrossRef]
26.
Gavin, A.R.; Woo, B.; Conway, A.; Takeuchi, D. The Association between Racial Discrimination, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and
Cardiovascular-Related Conditions among Non-Hispanic Blacks: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol
and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). J. Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2021. [CrossRef]
27.
Bourassa, K.J.; Hendrickson, R.C.; Reger, G.M.; Norr, A.M. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Effects on Cardiovascular
Physiology: A Systematic Review and Agenda for Future Research. J. Trauma Stress 2020. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Challenges 2021,12, 9 11 of 14
28.
Zieba, M.; Wiechec, K.; Bieganska-Banas, J.; Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, W. Coexistence of Post-traumatic Growth and Post-
traumatic Depreciation in the Aftermath of Trauma: Qualitative and Quantitative Narrative Analysis. Front. Psychol.
2019
,10, 687.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Triplett, K.N.; Tedeschi, R.G.; Cann, A.; Calhoun, L.G.; Reeve, C.L. Posttraumatic Growth, Meaning in Life, and Life Satisfaction
in Response to Trauma. Psychol. Trauma-Us 2012,4, 400–410. [CrossRef]
30.
Mey, L.K.; Chmitorz, A.; Kurth, K.; Wenzel, M.; Kalisch, R.; Tuscher, O.; Kubiak, T. Increases of negative affect following daily
hassles are not moderated by neuroticism: An ecological momentary assessment study. Stress Health
2020
,36, 615–628. [CrossRef]
31.
Jayawickreme, E.; Infurna, F.J.; Alajak, K.; Blackie, L.E.R.; Chopik, W.J.; Chung, J.M.; Dorfman, A.; Fleeson, W.; Forgeard, M.J.C.;
Frazier, P.; et al. Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. J.
Personal. 2021,89, 145–165. [CrossRef]
32.
Infurna, F.J.; Jayawickreme, E. Fixing the Growth Illusion: New Directions for Research in Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth.
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2019,28, 152–158. [CrossRef]
33.
Tsai, J.; Pietrzak, R.H. Trajectories of posttraumatic growth among US military veterans: A 4-year nationally representative,
prospective cohort study. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2017,136, 483–492. [CrossRef]
34.
Tallman, B.; Shaw, K.; Schultz, J.; Altmaier, E. Well-being and posttraumatic growth in unrelated donor marrow transplant
survivors: A nine-year longitudinal study. Rehabil. Psychol. 2010,55, 204–210. [CrossRef]
35.
Wolchik, S.A.; Coxe, S.; Tein, J.Y.; Sandler, I.N.; Ayers, T.S. Six-year longitudinal predictors of posttraumatic growth in parentally
bereaved adolescents and young adults. Omega (Westport) 2008,58, 107–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36.
Boehm, J.K.; Chen, Y.; Williams, D.R.; Ryff, C.; Kubzansky, L.D. Unequally distributed psychological assets: Are there social
disparities in optimism, life satisfaction, and positive affect? PLoS ONE 2015,10, e0118066. [CrossRef]
37.
Zou, R.; Xu, X.; Hong, X.; Yuan, J. Higher Socioeconomic Status Predicts Less Risk of Depression in Adolescence: Serial Mediating
Roles of Social Support and Optimism. Front. Psychol. 2020,11, 1955. [CrossRef]
38.
Weyers, S.; Dragano, N.; Mobus, S.; Beck, E.M.; Stang, A.; Mohlenkamp, S.; Jockel, K.H.; Erbel, R.; Siegrist, J. Low socio-economic
position is associated with poor social networks and social support: Results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Int. J. Equity
Health 2008,7, 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39.
Aartsen, M.; Veenstra, M.; Hansen, T. Social pathways to health: On the mediating role of the social network in the relation
between socio-economic position and health. SSM Popul. Health 2017,3, 419–426. [CrossRef]
40.
Prescott, S.L.; Logan, A.C. Each meal matters in the exposome: Biological and community considerations in fast-food-
socioeconomic associations. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2017,27 (Pt B), 328–335. [CrossRef]
41.
Hamama-Raz, Y.; Pat-Horenczyk, R.; Roziner, I.; Perry, S.; Stemmer, S.M. Can posttraumatic growth after breast cancer promote
positive coping?-A cross-lagged study. Psychooncology 2019,28, 767–774. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42.
Wu, X.; Kaminga, A.C.; Dai, W.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.; Pan, X.; Liu, A. The prevalence of moderate-to-high posttraumatic growth: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2019,243, 408–415. [CrossRef]
43.
Gilbert, D.T.; Pinel, E.C.; Wilson, T.D.; Blumberg, S.J.; Wheatley, T.P. Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective
forecasting. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998,75, 617–638. [CrossRef]
44.
Boals, A.; Bedford, L.A.; Callahan, J.L. Perceptions of Change after a Trauma and Perceived Posttraumatic Growth: A Prospective
Examination. Behav. Sci. 2019,9, 10. [CrossRef]
45. Locke, R. Salk: Be a Good Ancestor; Standard-Speaker: Hazleton, PA, USA, 9 March 1984; p. 10.
46.
Walsh, D.M.J.; Groarke, A.M.; Morrison, T.G.; Durkan, G.; Rogers, E.; Sullivan, F.J. Measuring a new facet of post traumatic
growth: Development of a scale of physical post traumatic growth in men with prostate cancer. PLoS ONE
2018
,13, e0195992.
[CrossRef]
47.
Bhushan, B. Perspectives on Posttraumatic Growth. In Psychosocial Interventions for Health and Well-Being; Misra, G., Ed.; Springer:
New Delhi, India, 2018. [CrossRef]
48.
Zeligman, M.; Varney, M.; Grad, R.I.; Huffstead, M. Posttraumatic Growth in Individuals With Chronic Illness: The Role of Social
Support and Meaning Making. J. Couns. Dev. 2018,96, 53–63. [CrossRef]
49.
King, L.A.; Hicks, J.A.; Krull, J.L.; Del Gaiso, A.K. Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.
2006,90, 179–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50.
Martela, F.; Steger, M.F. The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. J. Posit
Psychol. 2016,11, 531–545. [CrossRef]
51.
Burrow, A.L.; Spreng, R.N. Waiting with purpose: A reliable but small association between purpose in life and impulsivity.
Personal. Individ. Differ. 2016,90, 187–189. [CrossRef]
52.
Kim, E.S.; Strecher, V.J.; Ryff, C.D. Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2014
,111,
16331–16336. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Kim, E.S.; Shiba, K.; Boehm, J.K.; Kubzansky, L.D. Sense of purpose in life and five health behaviors in older adults. Prev. Med.
2020,139, 106172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54.
Zilioli, S.; Slatcher, R.B.; Ong, A.D.; Gruenewald, T.L. Purpose in life predicts allostatic load ten years later. J. Psychosom. Res.
2015,79, 451–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55.
Cohen, R.; Bavishi, C.; Rozanski, A. Purpose in Life and Its Relationship to All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events: A
Meta-Analysis. Psychosom. Med. 2016,78, 122–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Challenges 2021,12, 9 12 of 14
56. Strecher, V.; Terry, P. Health and life purpose: What’s the connection? Am. J. Health Promot. 2014,29, TAHP2-4. [PubMed]
57.
Straus, E.; Norman, S.B.; Tripp, J.C.; Pitts, M.; Pietrzak, R.H. Purpose in Life and Conscientiousness Protect Against the
Development of Suicidal Ideation in U.S. Military Veterans with PTSD and MDD: Results from the National Health and Resilience
in Veterans Study. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 2019,3, 2470547019872172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58.
Kinoshita, S.; Hirooka, N.; Kusano, T.; Saito, K.; Nakamoto, H. Does Improvement in Health-Related Lifestyle Habits Increase
Purpose in Life among a Health Literate Cohort? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 8878. [CrossRef]
59.
Grossmann, I.; Weststrate, N.M.; Ardelt, M.; Brienza, J.P.; Dong, M.X.; Ferrari, M.; Fournier, M.A.; Hu, C.S.; Nusbaum, H.C.;
Vervaeke, J. The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns. Psychol. Inq. 2020,31, 103–133. [CrossRef]
60.
Koller, I.; Levenson, M.R.; Gluck, J. What Do You Think You Are Measuring? A Mixed-Methods Procedure for Assessing the
Content Validity of Test Items and Theory-Based Scaling. Front. Psychol. 2017,8, 126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61.
Yang, S.K.; Ha, Y. Exploring the Relationships between Posttraumatic Growth, Wisdom, and Quality of Life in Older Cancer
Survivors. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019,20, 2667–2672. [CrossRef]
62.
Byra, S. Associations between post-traumatic growth and wisdom in people with long-term paraplegia—The role of disability
appraisals and participation. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021, 1–8. [CrossRef]
63.
Ardelt, M.; Jeste, D.V. Wisdom and Hard Times: The Ameliorating Effect of Wisdom on the Negative Association Between
Adverse Life Events and Well-Being. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2018,73, 1374–1383. [CrossRef]
64.
Weststrate, N.M.; Gluck, J. Hard-Earned Wisdom: Exploratory Processing of Difficult Life Experience Is Positively Associated
With Wisdom. Dev. Psychol. 2017,53, 800–814. [CrossRef]
65.
Plews-Ogan, M.; Ardelt, M.; Owens, J. Growth through Adversity: Exploring Associations between Internal Strengths, Posttrau-
matic Growth, and Wisdom. J. Value Inquiry 2019,53, 371–391. [CrossRef]
66.
Tedeschi, R.G.; Shakespeare-Finch, J.; Taku, K.; Calhoun, L.G. Posttraumatic growth beyond the individual. In Posttraumatic
Growth: Theory, Research, and Applications; Tedeschi, R.G., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
67.
Ferrari, M.; Alhosseini, F. Cultural differences in wisdom. In The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom; Sternberg, R.J., Gluck, J., Eds.;
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 409–428.
68.
Yang, S.; Intezari, A. Non-western lay conceptions of wisdom. In The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom; Sternberg, R.J., Gluck, J.,
Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 429–452.
69.
Laslo-Roth, R.; George-Levi, S.; Margalit, M. Social participation and posttraumatic growth: The serial mediation of hope, social
support, and reappraisal. J. Community Psychol. 2020. [CrossRef]
70. Stallard, P.; Pereira, A.I.; Barros, L. Post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic in carers of children in Portugal and
the UK: Cross-sectional online survey. BJPsych Open 2021,7, e37. [CrossRef]
71.
Vazquez, C.; Valiente, C.; Garcia, F.E.; Contreras, A.; Peinado, V.; Trucharte, A.; Bentall, R.P. Post-Traumatic Growth and Stress-
Related Responses during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a National Representative Sample: The Role of Positive Core Beliefs about
the World and Others. J. Happiness Stud. 2021, 1–21. [CrossRef]
72.
White, R.E.; Kuehn, M.M.; Duckworth, A.L.; Kross, E.; Ayduk, O. Focusing on the future from afar: Self-distancing from future
stressors facilitates adaptive coping. Emotion 2019,19, 903–916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73.
Grossmann, I.; Kross, E. The impact of culture on adaptive versus maladaptive self-reflection. Psychol. Sci.
2010
,21, 1150–1157.
[CrossRef]
74.
Dorfman, A.; Oakes, H.; Santos, H.C.; Grossmann, I. Self-distancing promotes positive emotional change after adversity: Evidence
from a micro-longitudinal field experiment. J. Personal. 2021,89, 132–144. [CrossRef]
75.
Grossmann, I.; Kross, E. Exploring Solomon’s paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning
about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychol. Sci. 2014,25, 1571–1580. [CrossRef]
76.
Kross, E.; Grossmann, I. Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. J. Exp. Psychol.
Gen. 2012,141, 43–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
77.
Huynh, A.C.; Yang, D.Y.J.; Grossmann, I. The Value of Prospective Reasoning for Close Relationships. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci.
2016,7, 893–902. [CrossRef]
78.
Glueck, J.; Bluck, S.; Weststrate, N.M. More on the MORE Life Experience Model: What We Have Learned (So Far). J. Value Inquiry
2019,53, 349–370. [CrossRef]
79.
Whitehead, R.; Bates, G.; Elphinstone, B. Growing by Letting Go: Nonattachment and Mindfulness as Qualities of Advanced
Psychological Development. J. Adult Dev. 2020,27, 12–22. [CrossRef]
80.
Shiyko, M.P.; Hallinan, S.; Naito, T. Effects of Mindfulness Training on Posttraumatic Growth: A Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis. Mindfulness 2017,8, 848–858. [CrossRef]
81. Ardelt, M. Can wisdom and psychosocial growth be learned in university courses? J. Moral Educ. 2020,49, 30–45. [CrossRef]
82.
Boulware, J.; Huskey, B.; Mangelsdorf, H.; Nusbaum, H. The Effects of Mindfulness Training on Wisdom in Elementary School
Teachers. J. Educ. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2019,30, 1–10. [CrossRef]
83.
Gluck, J. The Important Difference Between Psychologists’ Labs and Real Life: Evaluating the Validity of Models of Wisdom.
Psychol. Inq. 2020,31, 144–150. [CrossRef]
84.
Stellar, J.E.; Gordon, A.M.; Piff, P.K.; Cordaro, D.; Anderson, C.L.; Bai, Y.; Maruskin, L.A.; Keltner, D. Self-Transcendent Emotions
and Their Social Functions: Compassion, Gratitude, and Awe Bind Us to Others Through Prosociality. Emot. Rev.
2017
,9, 200–207.
[CrossRef]
Challenges 2021,12, 9 13 of 14
85. Keltner, D.; Piff, P.K. Self-Transcendent Awe as a Moral Grounding of Wisdom. Psychol. Inq. 2020,31, 160–163. [CrossRef]
86.
Keltner, D.; Haidt, J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn. Emot.
2003
,17, 297–314. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
87.
Sturm, V.E.; Datta, S.; Roy, A.R.K.; Sible, I.J.; Kosik, E.L.; Veziris, C.R.; Chow, T.E.; Morris, N.A.; Neuhaus, J.; Kramer, J.H.; et al.
Big smile, small self: Awe walks promote prosocial positive emotions in older adults. Emotion 2020. [CrossRef]
88.
Arcangeli, M.; Sperduti, M.; Jacquot, A.; Piolino, P.; Dokic, J. Awe and the Experience of the Sublime: A Complex Relationship.
Front. Psychol. 2020,11, 1340. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
89.
Rudd, M.; Vohs, K.D.; Aaker, J. Awe Expands People’s Perception of Time, Alters Decision Making, and Enhances Well-Being.
Psychol. Sci. 2012,23, 1130–1136. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
90.
Shiota, M.N.; Keltner, D.; Mossman, A. The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cogn. Emot.
2007
,21,
944–963. [CrossRef]
91.
Van Cappellen, P.; Saroglou, V. Awe Activates Religious and Spiritual Feelings and Behavioral Intentions. Psychol. Relig. Spirit.
2012,4, 223–236. [CrossRef]
92.
Stellar, J.E.; John-Henderson, N.; Anderson, C.L.; Gordon, A.M.; McNeil, G.D.; Keltner, D. Positive Affect and Markers of
Inflammation: Discrete Positive Emotions Predict Lower Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines. Emotion
2015
,15, 129–133. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
93.
Schneider, K.J. Awe: More than a lab experience—A rejoinder to “awe: ‘more than a feeling’” by Alice Chirico and Andrea
Gaggioli. Humanist. Psychol. 2020,48, 100–104. [CrossRef]
94.
Schneider, K.J. The Depolarizing of America. A Guidebook for Social Healing; University Professors Press: Colorado Springs, CO,
USA, 2020.
95.
Sun, X.; Su, W.; Guo, X.; Tian, Z. The Impact of Awe Induced by COVID-19 Pandemic on Green Consumption Behavior in China.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 543. [CrossRef]
96. Frankl, V. Man’s Search for Meaning; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1959.
97.
Koliouli, F.; Canellopoulos, L. Dispositional Optimism, Stress, Post-traumatic stress Disorder and Post-traumatic Growth in Greek
general population facing the COVID-19 crisis. Eur. J. Trauma Dissociation 2021, 100209. [CrossRef]
98.
Malouff, J.M.; Schutte, N.S. Can psychological interventions increase optimism? A meta-analysis. J. Posit Psychol.
2017
,12,
594–604. [CrossRef]
99.
Scheier, M.F.; Swanson, J.D.; Barlow, M.A.; Greenhouse, J.B.; Wrosch, C.; Tindle, H.A. Optimism versus pessimism as predictors
of physical health: A comprehensive reanalysis of dispositional optimism research. Am. Psychol. 2020. [CrossRef]
100.
Heinonen, K.; Raikkonen, K.; Matthews, K.A.; Scheier, M.F.; Raitakari, O.T.; Pulkki, L.; Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. Socioeconomic
status in childhood and adulthood: Associations with dispositional optimism and pessimism over a 21-year follow-up. J. Personal.
2006,74, 1111–1126. [CrossRef]
101.
Robb, K.A.; Simon, A.E.; Wardle, J. Socioeconomic disparities in optimism and pessimism. Int. J. Behav. Med.
2009
,16, 331–338.
[CrossRef]
102.
Chipperfield, J.G.; Hamm, J.M.; Perry, R.P.; Parker, P.C.; Ruthig, J.C.; Lang, F.R. A healthy dose of realism: The role of optimistic
and pessimistic expectations when facing a downward spiral in health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019,232, 444–452. [CrossRef]
103.
Alkalay, S.; Sagi-Schwartz, A.; Wiseman, H. Increased empathy and helping behavior toward the mother in daughters of
Holocaust survivors. Traumatology 2020,26, 84–95. [CrossRef]
104.
Zwahlen, D.; Hagenbuch, N.; Carley, M.I.; Jenewein, J.; Buchi, S. Posttraumatic growth in cancer patients and partners–effects of
role, gender and the dyad on couples’ posttraumatic growth experience. Psychooncology 2010,19, 12–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105.
Manne, S.; Ostroff, J.; Winkel, G.; Goldstein, L.; Fox, K.; Grana, G. Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: Patient, partner, and
couple perspectives. Psychosom. Med. 2004,66, 442–454.
106.
Cormio, C.; Romito, F.; Viscanti, G.; Turaccio, M.; Lorusso, V.; Mattioli, V. Psychological well-being and posttraumatic growth in
caregivers of cancer patients. Front. Psychol. 2014,5, 1342. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
107.
Kamibeppu, K.; Sato, I.; Honda, M.; Ozono, S.; Sakamoto, N.; Iwai, T.; Okamura, J.; Asami, K.; Maeda, N.; Inada, H.; et al. Mental
health among young adult survivors of childhood cancer and their siblings including posttraumatic growth. J. Cancer Surviv.
2010,4, 303–312. [CrossRef]
108.
Greene, T.; Lahav, Y.; Kanat-Maymon, Y.; Solomon, Z. A Longitudinal Study of Secondary Posttraumatic Growth in Wives of
Ex-POWs. Psychiatry 2015,78, 186–197. [PubMed]
109.
Dar, I.A.; Iqbal, N. Beyond linear evidence: The curvilinear relationship between secondary traumatic stress and vicarious
posttraumatic growth among healthcare professionals. Stress Health 2020,36, 203–212. [CrossRef]
110.
Doherty, M.E.; Scannell-Desch, E.; Bready, J. A Positive Side of Deployment: Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth in U.S. Military
Nurses Who Served in the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2020,52, 233–241. [CrossRef]
111.
Zerach, G. “He ain’t heavy, he’s my brother”: Distress tolerance moderates the association between secondary posttraumatic
symptoms and secondary posttraumatic growth among siblings of combat veterans. Psychol. Trauma
2020
,12, 687–697. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
112. Maitlis, S. Posttraumatic Growth at Work. Annu Rev. Organ. Psych. 2020,7, 395–419. [CrossRef]
113.
Olson, K.; Shanafelt, T.; Southwick, S. Pandemic-Driven Posttraumatic Growth for Organizations and Individuals. JAMA
2020
,
324, 1829–1830. [CrossRef]
Challenges 2021,12, 9 14 of 14
114.
Hormann, S.; Vivian, P. Organizational trauma in university settings. In Emerging Contours of Excellence; Mohan, J., Ed.; Punjab
University of Press: Chandigarh, India, 2017; pp. 188–198.
115.
Alexander, B.N.; Greenbaum, B.; Shani, A.B.; Mitki, Y. Organizational Post-Traumatic Growth: Thriving After Adversity. Acad.
Manag. Proc. 2020,2020, 18506. [CrossRef]
116. Calhoun, L.G.; Tedeschi, R.G. Posttraumatic Growth in Clinical Practice; Routledge: East Sussex, UK, 2013.
117.
Vázquez, C.; Pérez-Sales, P.; Hervás, G. Positive effects of terrorism and posttraumatic growth: An individual and community
perspective. In Trauma, Recovery, and Growth: Positive Psychological Perspectives on Posttraumatic Stress; Joseph, S., Linley, P.A., Eds.;
John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 63–91.
118.
Eaton-Robb, P. Sandy Hook: Families Dedicate Time to Charity, Activism 5 Years after Tragedy; Associated Press, 14 December 2017;
Available online: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/12/13/sandy-hook-school-shooting-families- 5-year-
anniversary/951016001/ (accessed on 5 March 2021).
119.
Wilcox, A.M. “We’ve Had Enough”: Youth Activists’ Pathways to Participation and Social Media Practices Following the
Parkland Shooting. Clemson University, All Dissertations. 2020, p. 2698. Available online: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_
dissertations/2698 (accessed on 5 March 2021).
120.
Kirby, T. Evidence mounts on the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities. Lancet Respir. Med.
2020
,8, 547–548.
[CrossRef]
121. Barber, R.; Law, S.F. Exposing Inequity in Australian Society: Are we all in it Together? Soc. Health Sci. 2020,18, 96–115.
122.
Pauls, J.E. The Impact of Posttraumatic Growth on Authentic Leader Development: Five Portraits of Women Cancer Survivors
in Leadership. Gonzaga University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Number 10666061. 2017. Available online: https:
//search.proquest.com/openview/0a8862b27dba3b281b0f97e32ef32cc1/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar (accessed on
12 February 2021).
123.
Gluck, J. Wisdom vs. populism and polarization: Learning to regulate our evolved intuitions. In Applying Wisdom to Contemporary
World Problems; Sternberg, R.J., Ed.; Palgrave MacMillan: London, UK, 2019.
124.
Griskevicius, V.; Cantu, S.M.; van Vugt, M. The Evolutionary Bases for Sustainable Behavior: Implications for Marketing, Policy,
and Social Entrepreneurship. J. Public Policy Mark. 2012,31, 115–128. [CrossRef]
125.
Mischinski, M.; Jayawickreme, E. Can moral exemplars promote wisdom. In Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems;
Sternberg, R.J., Ed.; Palgrave MacMillan: London, UK, 2019.
126.
Dickinson, S. Post-traumatic growth in the twenty-first century: How current trends may threaten our ability to grow after
trauma. J. Posit. Psychol. 2020. [CrossRef]
127.
Prescott, S.L.; Bland, J.S. Spaceship Earth Revisited: The Co-Benefits of Overcoming Biological Extinction of Experience at the
Level of Person, Place and Planet. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 1407. [CrossRef]
128. Seligman, M.; Flourish, A. Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
... Even the way that we approach our problems. In this sense, our greatest challenges may also create our greatest opportunities to change how we do things, and how we work together on a global scale-in ways we never have before [1]. ...
... Here, I discuss two prominent contemporary utopian visions-a Green utopia and a Sci-Fi utopia-and some experiments designed to assess the motivational capacity of those utopian visions. These studies showed that when asked to think and write about a Green utopia people (1) ascribed to that society greater warmth, positive emotions and other positive characteristics (e.g., peace, democracy), and (2) were more motivated to change their society and perform pro-environmental behaviours. When asked to think and write about a Sci-Fi society, however, no such effects were observed. ...
... Misako Nagata 1 In the presentation, I discuss my mixed methods research study about urban children's wellbeing through nature immersion-being and doing in natural space-from the perspective of Nursing. This research came from my lifelong inquiry: everyday phenomena around us can be observed in order or pattern, and this would be the conditions of natural law. ...
Article
Full-text available
The “Earthrise” photograph, taken on the 1968 Apollo 8 mission, became one of the most significant images of the 20th Century. It triggered a profound shift in environmental awareness and the potential for human unity—inspiring the first Earth Day in 1970. Taking inspiration from these events 50 years later, we initiated Project Earthrise at our 2020 annual conference of inVIVO Planetary Health. This builds on the emergent concept of planetary health, which provides a shared narrative to integrate rich and diverse approaches from all aspects of society towards shared solutions to global challenges. The acute catastrophe of the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn greater attention to many other interconnected global health, environmental, social, spiritual, and economic problems that have been underappreciated or neglected for decades. This is accelerating opportunities for greater collaborative action, as many groups now focus on the necessity of a “Great Transition”. While ambitious integrative efforts have never been more important, it is imperative to apply these with mutualistic value systems as a compass, as we seek to make wiser choices. Project Earthrise is our contribution to this important process. This underscores the imperative for creative ecological solutions to challenges in all systems, on all scales with advancing global urbanization in the digital age—for personal, environmental, economic and societal health alike. At the same time, our agenda seeks to equally consider our social and spiritual ecology as it does natural ecology. Revisiting the inspiration of “Earthrise”, we welcome diverse perspectives from across all dimensions of the arts and the sciences, to explore novel solutions and new normative values. Building on academic rigor, we seek to place greater value on imagination, kindness and mutualism as we address our greatest challenges, for the health of people, places and planet.
... Further study of climate-change related trauma, the opportunity for PTG, and how such growth may support our capacity to mitigate and adapt to future change will be an incredibly important area of future research. Additionally, research on the impact of such trauma is important not only on an individual level, but on a community and planetary level (Logan et al., 2021), investigating the potential role of PTG on larger scales. For example, Logan et al. (2021) discuss ways in which vicarious PTG can occur (using an example of healthcare workers when working with trauma survivors). ...
... Additionally, research on the impact of such trauma is important not only on an individual level, but on a community and planetary level (Logan et al., 2021), investigating the potential role of PTG on larger scales. For example, Logan et al. (2021) discuss ways in which vicarious PTG can occur (using an example of healthcare workers when working with trauma survivors). As such, they highlight the role that organisations have taken to facilitate PTG on a larger scale for their workers. ...
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 presented a major societal challenge including threat to life, bereavement, self-isolation, loss of income and significant psychological distress. Yet, it is possible that such suffering may also lead to post-traumatic growth (PTG) and subsequent wellbeing. The current study aimed to investigate the contributors to PTG and whether PTG mediated their relationship with wellbeing, measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale. In a cross-sectional sample of 136 participants (mean age = 30.52; SD = 13.80), a hierarchical regression and mediation analysis was conducted, focusing on physical activity, gratitude, tragic optimism, social support, and nature connection, guided by our recently published ‘GENIAL’ framework (Mead, Fisher, & Kemp, 2021). The regression analysis highlighted that our variables predicted up to 18% of the variance in PTG, whilst controlling for age, gender and subjective social status, with gratitude and nature connection being key predictors – indicating the importance of these factors over and above previously reported contributors to PTG, such as social support. Our findings provide new evidence on the drivers of PTG and raise important questions concerning the relationship between the related constructs of PTG and wellbeing. Limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.
... Even the way that we approach our problems. In this sense, our greatest challenges may also create our greatest opportunities to change how we do things, and how we work together on a global scale-in ways we never have before [1]. ...
... Here, I discuss two prominent contemporary utopian visions-a Green utopia and a Sci-Fi utopia-and some experiments designed to assess the motivational capacity of those utopian visions. These studies showed that when asked to think and write about a Green utopia people (1) ascribed to that society greater warmth, positive emotions and other positive characteristics (e.g., peace, democracy), and (2) were more motivated to change their society and perform pro-environmental behaviours. When asked to think and write about a Sci-Fi society, however, no such effects were observed. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The “Earthrise” photograph, taken on the 1968 Apollo 8 mission, became one of the most significant images of the 20th Century. It triggered a profound shift in environmental awareness and the potential for human unity—inspiring the first Earth Day in 1970. Taking inspiration from these events 50 years later, we initiated Project Earthrise at our 2020 annual conference of inVIVO Planetary Health. This builds on the emergent concept of planetary health, which provides a shared narrative to integrate rich and diverse approaches from all aspects of society towards shared solutions to global challenges. The acute catastrophe of the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn greater attention to many other interconnected global health, environmental, social, spiritual, and economic problems that have been underappreciated or neglected for decades. This is accelerating opportunities for greater collaborative action, as many groups now focus on the necessity of a “Great Transition”. While ambitious integrative efforts have never been more important, it is imperative to apply these with mutualistic value systems as a compass, as we seek to make wiser choices. Project Earthrise is our contribution to this important process. This underscores the imperative for creative ecological solutions to challenges in all systems, on all scales with advancing global urbanization in the digital age—for personal, environmental, economic and societal health alike. At the same time, our agenda seeks to equally consider our social and spiritual ecology as it does natural ecology. Revisiting the inspiration of “Earthrise”, we welcome diverse perspectives from across all dimensions of the arts and the sciences, to explore novel solutions and new normative values. Building on academic rigor, we seek to place greater value on imagination, kindness and mutualism as we address our greatest challenges, for the health of people, places and planet.
... This growth can explain how freedom, comfort, and relief can be felt following a break-up. Although post-traumatic growth is not a cure for all situations, it can help individuals develop a stronger sense of resilience and manage their stress levels (Logan et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper explains the breakup experiences of romantic relationships, coping strategies, and post-traumatic growth (PTG) among vicenarian adults. It employed a qualitative-based research design using a phenomenological method. Snowball and purposive sampling methods were used to select seven participants with a background of romantic relationship breakup experience within two years. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect participant data, and data were analyzed using a thematic analysis procedure. This study found that romantic relationships included understanding of love, utmost happiness in love, and need in love. In contrast, breakups indicated decision-making, emotional impact, and self-blame. Besides, the result also reported that the coping methods involved emotional engagement and acceptance state (duration taken to overcome the emotions). After a romantic relationship breakup, self-growth was found more in personal strength, close relationships, new possibilities, spiritual development, and greater appreciation of life as PTG implications. The findings concluded that breakup-experienced participants coped through the grief process and enhanced their self-growth. This study helped to create awareness among society to view their grief as a growth-oriented process.
... Trauma is an increasingly urgent concern in modern societies, both in reaction to multiple sources of turbulence in local and global settings and as a concept open for interpretation, negotiation, and mobilisation in public debates and social practices. Trauma can severely affect individuals' , groups' , and societies' outlook on the future and their ability to act on personal, societal, and planetary challenges (Logan et al., 2021). Accordingly, Wineman (2008) highlights that trauma can involve factors from child-rearing practices to the institutional arrangements of economic and political power that shape political values. ...
Article
Trauma is a highly topical subject of growing relevance in different contexts and scientific traditions that deal with societal challenges and transformation. At the same time, knowledge on different understandings of trauma is still scarce and scattered across disciplines. Against this background, we present and discuss the complexity of trauma understandings from five selected disciplinary perspectives and its significance at individual, group, and societal level, using COVID-19 as an illustrative case. The article shows how trauma is understood from multiple perspectives by referring to different conditions and phenomena. At the same time, there are certain similarities across all disciplinary angles. Trauma refers to first-hand individual or collective experiences of a crisis and/or a sense of external and internal disruption. Trauma often has severe consequences, but it simultaneously entails the possibility of transformation. The latter does not only relate to the individual, it can also involve groups, systems, and society at large. The COVID-19 case illuminates the complexity of trauma understandings and associated transformation, The complexity of multiple trauma understandings across disciplines-the COVID-19 pandemic as a 'case' SIGRID STJERNSWÄRD ET AL. 2 pointing to trauma as a floating signifier, which is largely open to different attributions of meaning depending on discipline and perspective. We conclude with a call for more integrated and nuanced inter-and transdisciplinary understandings of trauma to account for the concept's complexity and its significance at individual, collective, intergenerational, and global levels.
... Climate change and disease risks, including AMR, are two of the most pressing challenges of the Anthropocene and cannot be considered in isolation [2]. Planetary health is already deeply invested in identifying the complex links between climate change and zoonotic disease [3], to raising awareness of the intersection of Anthropocene risks in general [4][5][6], and argues for addressing global and intergenerational risks from AMR through a lens of planetary health ethics [7]. Other fields have also made such links explicit [8][9][10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Antibiotic resistance is a pressing global, one health and planetary health challenge. Links between climate change, antibiotic use, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance have been well documented, but less attention has been given to the impact(s) of earth systems on specific bacterial livestock diseases at a more granular level. Understanding the precise impacts of climate change on livestock health-and in turn the use of antibiotics to address that ill-health-is important in providing an evidence base from which to tackle such impacts and to develop practical, implementable, and locally acceptable solutions within and beyond current antibiotic stewardship programs. In this paper, we set out the case for better integration of earth scientists and their specific disciplinary skill set (specifically, problem-solving with incomplete/fragmentary data; the ability to work across four dimensions and at the interface between the present and deep/geological time) into planetary health research. Then, using a case study from our own research, we discuss a methodology that makes use of risk mapping, a common methodology in earth science but less frequently used in health science, to map disease risk against changing climatic conditions at a granular level. The aim of this exercise is to argue that, by enabling livestock farmers, veterinarians, and animal health observatories to better predict future disease risk and risk impacts based on predicted future climate conditions, earth science can help to provide an evidence base from which to influence policy and develop mitigations. Our example-of climate conditions' impact on livestock health in Karnataka, India-clearly evidences the benefit of integrating earth scientists into planetary health research.
... Some scholars have used the framework of post-traumatic growth to characterize the process of engaging with the climate crisis and other ecological crises (see, e.g., [16,147,148]). These approaches point out that it is possible to grow more realistic and resilient as a result of the process. ...
Article
Full-text available
As the ecological crisis grows more intense, people experience many forms of eco-anxiety and ecological grief. This article explores the broad process of encountering eco-anxiety and ecological grief, and engages in the constructive task of building a new model of that process. Eco-anxiety and grief are here seen as fundamentally healthy reactions to threats and loss, and only the strongest forms of them are seen as problems. The aim is to help researchers, various professionals and the general public by providing a model which is (a) simple enough but (b) more nuanced than stage models which may give a false impression of linearity. The article uses an interdisciplinary method. The proposed new model includes both chronological and thematic aspects. The early phases of Unknowing and Semi-consciousness are followed potentially by some kind of Awakening and various kinds of Shock and possible trauma. A major feature of the model is the following complex phase of Coping and Changing, which is framed as consisting of three major dimensions: Action (pro-environmental behavior of many kinds), Grieving (including other emotional engagement), and Distancing (including both self-care and problematic disavowal). The model predicts that if there is trouble in any of these three dimensions, adjusting will be more difficult. The model thus helps in seeing, e.g., the importance of self-care for coping. The possibility of stronger eco-anxiety and/or eco-depression is always present, including the danger of burnout. The ethical and psychological aim is called Adjustment and Transformation, which includes elements of, e.g., meaning-finding and acceptance. The need for Coping and Changing continues, but there is more awareness and flexibility in a metaphase of Living with the Ecological Crisis, where the titles and subtitles of the three dimensions of coping are switched.
... Climate change and disease risks, including AMR, are two of the most pressing challenges of the Anthropocene and cannot be considered in isolation [2]. Planetary Health is already deeply invested in identifying the complex links between climate change and zoonotic disease [3], to raising awareness of the intersection of Anthropocene risks in general [4,5,6] and argues for addressing global and intergenerational risks from AMR through a lens of planetary health ethics [7]. Other fields have also made such links explicit [8,9,10]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Antibiotic resistance is a pressing global and planetary health challenge. Links between climate change, antibiotic use and the emergence of antibiotic resistance have been well documented, but less attention has been given to the impact(s) of earth systems on specific bacterial livestock diseases at a more granular level. Understanding the precise impacts of climate change on livestock health – and in turn the use of antibiotics to address that ill-health – is important in providing an evidence base to tackle such impacts and to develop practical, implementable and locally acceptable solutions within and beyond current antibiotic stewardship programmes. In this paper, we set out the case for better integration of earth scientists and their specific disciplinary skill set (specifically, problem-solving with incomplete/fragmentary data; the ability to work across four dimensions and at the interface between the present and deep/geological time) into planetary health research. We then discuss a methodology that makes use of risk mapping, a common methodology in earth science but less frequently used in health science, to map disease risk against changing climatic conditions at a granular level. This will enable predictions of future disease risk and risk impacts based on predicted future climate conditions, and thus provide an evidence base for planetary health activists to influence policy and develop mitigations. Our case study – of climate conditions’ impact on livestock health in Karnataka, India – clearly evidences the benefit of integrating earth scientists into planetary health research.
... Any crisis or trauma can precipitate change through post traumatic growth. A global crisis (or many) may be an opportunity to catalyze action for much needed global change [53]. We can already see that our current predicament has initiated countless new conversations across traditionally siloed disciples and sectors. ...
Article
Full-text available
The unprecedented global rise in mental anguish is closely linked with the erosion of our social fabric, economic and political systems, and to our natural environments. We are facing multiple new large-scale threats to health, safety, and security, with a growing lack of trust in others and in authorities. Pervasive stress, anxiety, depression, and uncertainty are of a nature and scale we have never seen before—manifesting in surging violence, community breakdown, domestic abuse, opioid and other drug overdoses, social isolation, and suicides—with alarming new mental health trends in children and young people. This has been made worse by the COVID-19 pandemic and amplified by an exponential increase in the amount and immediacy of information propagated through electronic media—often negative with manipulative intent aimed at dividing opinions through anger and fear. At the same time, there has been progressive erosion of kindness, civility, compassion, and social supports. Here, in this report from a “campfire” meeting held by the Nova Institute for Health, we discuss the importance of understanding the complexity of these interrelated threats which impact individual and collective mental health. Our dialog highlighted the need for efforts that build both individual and community resilience with more empowering, positive, and inspiring shared narratives that increase purpose and belonging. This includes placing greater value on positive assets that promote awareness and resilience, including creativity, spirituality, mindfulness, and nature connection—recognizing that ‘inner’ transitions contribute to shifts in mindsets for ‘outward’ transformation in communities and the world at large. Ultimately, these strategies also encourage and normalize mutualistic values that are essential for collectively improving the health of people, places, and the planet, by overcoming the destructive, exploitative worldviews which created so many of our current challenges in the first place.
... Mindfulness can lead to awareness of otherwise unrecognized vitality in a person; this is at least one way in which mindfulness can promote posttraumatic growth as a result of the struggle with highly challenging life circumstances [98]. The lessons of mindfulness in the context of posttraumatic growth might apply at larger scales of organizations, communities, or societies [99]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The concept of planetary health blurs the artificial lines between health at scales of person, place, and planet. It emphasizes the interconnected grand challenges of our time, and underscores the need for integration of biological, psychological, social, and cultural aspects of health in the modern environment. Here, in our Viewpoint article, we revisit vaccine pioneer Jonas Salk’s contention that wisdom is central to the concept of planetary health. Our perspective is centered on the idea that practical wisdom is associated with decision-making that leads to flourishing—the vitality and fullest potential of individuals, communities, and life on the planet as a whole. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has illustrated the acute consequences of unwise and mindless leadership; yet, wisdom and mindfulness, or lack thereof, is no less consequential to grotesque biodiversity losses, climate change, environmental degradation, resource depletion, the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), health inequalities, and social injustices. Since mindfulness is a teachable asset linked to both wisdom and flourishing, we argue that mindfulness deserves much greater attention in the context of planetary health.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To examine associations between sociodemographic and mental health characteristics with household risk for food insecurity during the COVID-19 outbreak. Design Cross-sectional online survey analyzed using univariable tests and a multivariable logistic regression model. Setting The United States during the week of March 30, 2020. Participants Convenience sample of 1,965 American adults using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. Participants reporting household food insecurity prior to the pandemic were excluded from analyses. Results 1,250 participants reported household food security before the COVID-19 outbreak. Among this subset, 41% were identified as at risk for food insecurity after COVID-19, 55% were women and 73% were white. On multivariable analysis, race, income, relationship status, living situation, anxiety, and depression were significantly associated with incident risk for food insecurity. Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino respondents, respondents with annual income less than $100,000, and those living with children or others were significantly more likely to be newly at risk for food insecurity. Individuals at risk for food insecurity were 2.60 (95% CI 1.91-3.55) times more likely to screen positively for anxiety and 1.71 (95% CI 1.21-2.42) times more likely to screen positively for depression. Conclusions Increased risk for food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic is common, and certain populations are particularly vulnerable. There are strong associations between being at risk for food insecurity and anxiety/depression. Interventions to increase access to healthful foods, especially among minority and low-income individuals, and ease the socioemotional effects of the outbreak are crucial to relieving the economic stress of this pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Whether there is a serious fascist threat in the United States is debatable, but after the march on and the storming of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, 1,2 no one can contest that the question of whether fascism poses a serious threat to the United States is one that needs to be dealt with seriously. People today who exalt their race and stand for some form of authoritarian regime may not call themselves fascists, but their insurrectional plans belong to the history of that political movement. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print January 21, 2021: e1–e2. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306169 )
Article
Full-text available
The term “Anthropocene Syndrome” describes the wicked interrelated challenges of our time. These include, but are not limited to, unacceptable poverty (of both income and opportunity), grotesque biodiversity losses, climate change, environmental degradation, resource depletion, the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), health inequalities, social injustices, the spread of ultra-processed foods, consumerism and incivility in tandem with a diminished emphasis on the greater potential of humankind, efforts toward unity, or the value of fulfilment and flourishing of all humankind. Planetary health is a concept that recognizes the interdependent vitality of all natural and anthropogenic ecosystems—social, political and otherwise; it blurs the artificial lines between health at scales of person, place and planet. Promoting planetary health requires addressing the underlying pathology of “Anthropocene Syndrome” and the deeper value systems and power dynamics that promote its various signs and symptoms. Here, we focus on misinformation as a toxin that maintains the syndromic status quo—rapid dissemination of falsehoods and dark conspiracies on social media, fake news, alternative facts and medical misinformation described by the World Health Organization as an “infodemic”. In the context of planetary health, we explore the historical antecedents of this “infodemic” and underscore an urgent need to remediate the misinformation mess. It is our contention that education (especially in early life) emphasizing mindfulness and understanding of the mechanisms by which propaganda is spread (and unhealthy products are marketed) is essential. We expand the discourse on positive social contagion and argue that empowerment through education can help lead to an information transformation with the aim of flourishing along every link in the person, place and planet continuum.
Article
Full-text available
The response to the coronavirus outbreak and how the disease and its societal consequences pose risks to already vulnerable groups such those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged and ethnic minority groups. Researchers and community groups analysed how the COVID-19 crisis has exacerbated persisting vulnerabilities, socio-economic and structural disadvantage and discrimination faced by many communities of social disadvantage and ethnic diversity, and discussed future strategies on how best to engage and involve local groups in research to improve outcomes for childbearing women experiencing mental illness and those living in areas of social disadvantage and ethnic diversity. Discussions centred around: access, engagement and quality of care; racism, discrimination and trust; the need for engagement with community stakeholders; and the impact of wider social and economic inequalities. Addressing biomedical factors alone is not sufficient, and integrative and holistic long-term public health strategies that address societal and structural racism and overall disadvantage in society are urgently needed to improve health disparities and can only be implemented in partnership with local communities.
Article
Full-text available
Background Although the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health have attracted interest, little attention has focused on its positive effects and possible post-traumatic growth. Aims To assess anxiety, well-being and post-traumatic growth in carers of children aged 6–16 years in Portugal and the UK. Method A cross-sectional online survey of volunteers conducted at the peak of the first wave of COVID-19 during lockdown (1 May to 27 June 2020). Results A total of 385 caregivers (Portuguese, n = 185; UK, n = 200), predominantly mothers ( n = 341, 88.6%), completed the survey. The majority were working exclusively from home ( n = 271, 70.4%), almost half reported a reduction in income ( n = 174, 45.2%), most children were home taught ( n = 358, 93%), and 75 (19.5%) identified a family member with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. In total, 341 caregivers (88.6%) identified positives arising from COVID-19, most commonly related to the post-traumatic growth domains of improved relationships, a greater appreciation of life, discovering and embracing new possibilities, and positive spiritual change. A comparison of those who did ( n = 341) and did not ( n = 34) report any positives found a significant difference in well-being scores ( t 373 = 2.24, P = 0.025) but not in anxiety scores ( t 373 = 0.75, P = 0.45). Conclusions Despite experiencing considerable adversity, examples of post-traumatic growth during the lockdown were common. Although the voluntary online nature of our survey is a limitation, our findings suggest that further research exploring post-traumatic growth following pandemics is warranted.
Article
Full-text available
Update from the Editor-in-Chief
Article
Objectives To test the association between racial discrimination and cardiovascular-related conditions and whether PTSD mediates this relationship in a nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic Blacks.Methods We used data from the 2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions to conduct logistic regression analyses to examine the association between racial discrimination, PTSD, and cardiovascular-related conditions. We also performed mediation analyses to assess whether the association between racial discrimination and cardiovascular conditions was partly explained by PTSD.ResultsRacial discrimination was positively associated with both PTSD and cardiovascular-related conditions. Additionally, PTSD was positively associated with cardiovascular conditions. Results from the fully adjusted mediation models suggest that PTSD significantly mediated the association between racial discrimination and cardiovascular conditions.Conclusions Our results demonstrate an association between racial discrimination and cardiovascular-related conditions that is significantly mediated by PTSD. To improve cardiovascular functioning among non-Hispanic Blacks, health care professionals in conjunction with Black communities must adopt culturally competent screening for and treatment for PTSD. To address racial differences in cardiovascular conditions, public health efforts must address institutional policies that negatively alter health opportunities among the Black population.
Article
The aim of this study is to explore psychological and mental health implications of social distancing and lockdown, in Greece in order to gain a better understanding of the COVID-19 crisis. For the purposes of this article, quantitative measures are used: the Greek versions of “Life Orientation Scale-Revised” (LOT-R) (Lyrakos, Damigos, Mavreas, Georgia, & Dimoliatis, 2010) to investigate the presence of dispositional optimism tendencies, “Impact of Event scale” (Mystakidou, Tsilika, Parpa, Galanos, & Vlahos, 2007) to assess the traumatic evaluation of the current events, “Perceived Stress Scale” (Andreou et al., 2011) to measure the stress levels amongst population, and “Posttraumatic Growth Inventory” (Mystakidou, Tsilika, Parpa, Galanos, & Vlahos, 2008) to examine positive aspects of the situation, are used. Questionnaires were distributed online a month after social distancing measures and three weeks following lockdown. The survey is addressed to general adult population and data collection lasted until the end of curfew (May 4th 2020). Hundred and sixty-seven (N = 167) participants completed the survey. Main results show that women obtain higher scores than men on the Impact Event Scale and they identify social distancing and curfew as traumatic events. However, men exhibit higher levels of Posttraumatic growth comparing to women, as to subscales “life appreciation” and “spirituality”. Stress and posttraumatic stress are highly correlated to PTG and enable its development in the context of COVID-19. Implications for research and practice will be recommended.