Conference PaperPDF Available

A Study on the Potential of Cow Dung Waste as an Environmentally Friendly Alternative Energy Source

Authors:
A Study on the Potential of Cow Dung Waste as an
Environmentally Friendly Alternative
Energy Source
Ratminingsih1,* Jumadi2
1,2 Science Education Department, Graduate School Program, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: ratmi25@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Cow dung is a very serious problem for people around the farm. The problem is often caused by cow dung which
is not handled professionally. Its existence pollutes the environment, disturbs the scenery, and can be a vector of
disease. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the potential of cow dung waste as an
environmentally friendly alternative energy source. This study used a descriptive content analysis study method.
The study found that cow dung waste can be processed into biogas. The process is through fermenting the cow
dung in a biogas reactor. Biogas has various benefits as an alternative energy source, namely replacing LPG gas
and kerosene, power generation, water pump driving, and a substitute for gasoline fuel. The eco-friendly concept
boils down to optimizing the use of natural resources while maintaining environmental sustainability. The
potential for the utilization of cow dung waste can overcome public complaints about the scarcity of LPG gas
and kerosene, expensive electricity bills, fuel, and cases of environmental pollution due to cow dung waste. It is
recommended to provide education to the public about the utilization of cow dung to obtain optimal results.
Keywords: Cow Dung Waste, Environmentally Friendly, Alternative Energy Source.
1. INTRODUCTION
Currently, Indonesia's food security is mostly
supported by the livestock sector. One of them is cow
farming. The cow breeding centers in Indonesia
include Sekarmojo Village, Pasuruan and Wonosalam
District, Jombang and others. The villages are highly
potential for the development of cow farms due to
large area of land for the livestock along with its feed
and the culture of the community that supports it. The
large potential of cow farming provides great benefits
to support the provision of animal protein but can
also make an impact on environmental pollution [1].
The more cows that are raised, the more dung will be
produced. Cow dung waste in a large capacity is
generally not professionally processed by the
community. Disposing of waste to the open land until
it piles up creates new problems for the surrounding
environment [2]. These problems include unpleasant
odors, pollute the environment, and can become
vectors of disease [1]. Besides, unmanaged livestock
waste produces the largest greenhouse gas emissions,
which is around ± 18%. Every 1 kg of cow dung can
release about 60 liters of gas emissions into the air.
The largest composition is methane gas (CH4) [3].
Cows can produce dung waste in large
capacities every day. A cow weighing 454 kg can
produce up to 30 kg of faecal waste every day. If the
farmer has 5 cows, the amount of dung that is
produced will reach 150 kg per day. Farmers tend to
throw them on empty land or pile them up at the
edge of the pen [1]. The accumulation of cow dung
waste in the environment results in decreased
environmental quality. This is because the dirt that
is disposed of directly is still hot, so it can inhibit
plant growth. The application of environmentally
appropriate technology to overcome these problems
needs to be done gradually to maintain the balance
of the production sector with the preservation of the
surrounding environment [4].
The application of cow dung waste cultivation
to become an environmentally friendly alternative
energy source is important to do to reduce the
negative impact. This is in line with the concept of
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 528
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and
Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license -http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. 76
"Environmentally Friendly Development" which has
been proclaimed by the government in the Law of the
Republic of Indonesia No. 32 of 2009 concerning
Protection and Management of the Environment [4].
Every activity that runs in cow farming needs to pay
attention about the impact on the environment and
how to solve it. The activity of processing cow dung
waste into an alternative energy source is directed not
only to support environmental sustainability but also
to provide solutions to problems in other sectors.
The development of alternative energy sources
is also expected to overcome the scarcity and cost of
fossil energy sources in Indonesia. The price of fuel
oil and LPG today continues to increase from year
to year. The higher the price of fuel oil and LPG
make the people become restless. Apart from being
expensive, its availability on the market is also
increasingly scarce. Many communities, especially
those in rural areas, difficult to find it. It is common
for children in rural areas do not go to school to look
for firewood [5]. This should be concerned by many
parties. The development of alternative energy
sources with waste-based materials can reduce
people's dependence on non-renewable sources [3].
The utilization of cow dung waste can be developed
widely, such as for lighting and others. Therefore
we need a study that provides an understanding of
the public about the potential use of cow dung waste
in Indonesia.
This research is a descriptive content analysis
study to provide education to the public about the
utilization of cow dung waste. This is aimed to
obtain a detailed description of the information
content of a particular text [6]. The analysis was
carried out on various scientific sources regarding
the potential of cow dung waste as an alternative
energy source in Indonesia. Scientific sources used
include national and international scientific journals
as well as other sources relevant to the material.
2. DISCUSSION
2.1 Potential of Cow Farming in Indonesia
The potential for developing cow farms in
Indonesia is enormous. Cow breeding centers in
Indonesia, among others, are in the Village of
Sekarmojo-Pasuruan, Wonosalam-Jombang District,
Merauke Regency, and Cangkringan-Sleman and
various other areas [1] [4] [5] [7]. These areas are
very potential for cow farming because they have
natural resources that support animal feed. Besides,
the culture of the surrounding community also
supports the development of cow farming. One
example of the number of cow and buffalo in the
Merauke Regency until 2014 was around 33,000
heads [5]. The number of cow in Bali Province from
2013 to 2017 was 525,955 heads [8]. However, not
all people in the area have an understanding and
awareness to process cow dung waste into alternative
energy.
The potential amount of cow dung waste in
Indonesia can be seen from the number of cow
population. The more cows that are raised, the more
capacity for waste dung will be produced. The
population of beef cow in Indonesia in 2010 is
estimated at 10.8 million heads and 350,000 -
400,000 dairy cows. This number will continue to
increase with the limitation on meat imports by the
Minister of Agriculture. One cow can produce about
8-10 kg of dung per day so that in one year it
produces 2.6 - 3.6 tons. If one cow on average every
day produces 7 kg of dry dung, the dry cow dung
produced in Indonesia is 78.4 million kilograms of
dry dung per day [9].
2.2 Conversion of Waste into Alternative Energy
Sources
Cow dung waste can be processed into an
alternative energy source by processing it into biogas.
Biogas is a gas that is produced from various kinds of
organic waste such as animal dung and biomass
waste which is processed in an anaerobic digester or
closed room. Animal dung that can be used includes
cows, buffaloes, goats, chickens, and other livestock
[4].
Biogas contains methane gas (CH4) and carbon
dioxide (CO2). Methane gas in biogas can reach up to
70% while other gases are produced in small amounts
[10]. The concentration of methane gas determines
the amount of energy content in biogas. The greater
the methane content, the greater the energy content or
calorific value. The heating value of pure methane
gas is 8900 kcal / m3 while the heating value after
being converted into biogas is around 4800 to 6700
kcal / m3. The heating value is high enough so that it
can be used for various purposes such as lighting,
cooking, moving machines, and others [11]. Biogas
quality can be improved by removing carbon dioxide,
hydrogen sulfur, and water content [8].
The process of making biogas is very simple.
The principle of making biogas is the anaerobic
decomposition of organic material to produce gas,
mostly methane and carbon dioxide gas. Methane gas
has flammable properties [1]. Cow dung waste is put
into anaerobic biodigester tube. The anaerobic
decomposition process is assisted by several
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 528
77
microorganisms, including methane bacteria.
Microorganisms can work optimally in breaking
down organic matter when the temperature is set
around 30-50oC [3]. The by-product is an organic
fertilizer that can be used to fertilize plants [12]. The
accumulated gas is collected in the digester and then
distributed to the house for further use, for example
for lighting and fuel replacement [1]. Each type of
livestock produces a different amount of biogas, so
the potential of each type of dung is different [8].
The biogas produced from the above processing
can be used as an alternative energy source that
reduces the impact of fossil fuel use. These
alternative energy sources, among others, can be used
as electricity generation, a substitute for LPG and
kerosene when cooking [13]. Biogas can also be used
as a towing power for water pumps and fuel for
vehicles at the industrial level [14]. Equality of
biogas as an alternative energy source with other
energy sources, namely 1 m3 of biogas equivalent to
0.46 kg of LPG, 0.62 liters of kerosene, 0.52 liter of
diesel oil, 0.80 liters of petrol oil, 1.50 m3 of city gas
and firewood 3.50 kg [11]. The efficiency of biogas
on a small scale is 55% for cooking, 24% for heat
engines, and 3% for lighting [15].
2.2.1 Substitute for LPG Gas, Kerosene and
Firewood
The existence of scarcity and expensive LPG
gas and kerosene can be overcome by utilizing
biogas. Household biogas with 2 - 4 livestock or a
dung supply of 25 kg per day is sufficient to use a
reactor tube with a capacity of 2500 - 5000 liters. The
biogas produced is equivalent to 2 liters of
kerosene/day. This amount can meet the cooking
energy needs of about 6 family members. Research
conducted by Dianawati shows that the energy
contained in 1 m3 of biogas is 2,000-4,000 kcal or can
meet the cooking needs of a family (4-5 people) for 3
hours [16]. To cook 0.5 kg of rice, an average of 0.15
m3 of biogas is required in 30 minutes. The daily use
of the household requires an average of 3 m3 of gas.
The use of biogas in the household can reduce the
number of family expenses due to the expensive and
scarce LPG and kerosene. Even if converted, biogas
can replace the expenditure of 2 liters of kerosene or
10 kg of firewood per day [11].The biogas stove can
be modified from an LPG gas stove. How to modify
it is by drilling with an iron drill on the Gas Jet or
Spuyer injector, with a diameter of 1.5 mm to 2 mm.
The biogas stove can function as an LPG stove [11].
The blue flame color is the same as the LPG gas
flame. This indicates that biogas does not produce
soot which can pollute household kitchens and
cooking rooms. Even the use of biogas in the
Magelang Regency has a gas production potential of
86,690 m3. This value is equivalent to 43,345 kg of
LPG gas or 14,448 3 kg LPG cylinders which can be
used to cook about 278 households for 1 year [7].
2.2.2 Power Plants
Biogas has the potential to be used as a raw
material for electricity generation. A study in
Argosari Village, Malang Regency shows that a 5 m3
digester with two cows produces 3 m3 of biogas
which is enough to power a 400-watt generator for 6
hours [17]. 1 kWh of electricity can be generated by
utilizing 0.62 - 1 m3 of biogas [12]. Biogas can be
converted into electrical energy by knowing the
amount of cow dung produced every day [8]. Another
study in Bali Province, based on the level of cow
population from 2013 to 2017, it was found that the
average cow population in Bali Province was 525,955
heads. The potential for biogas from cow dung waste
produces electricity of 494,397.7 kWh / day.
2.2.3 Water Pump Drive Fuel
The water pump can suck water with biogas
fuel because biogas can be used in machines with
high compression ratios. The Pertamax fueled water
pump can suck water 2 times longer than the water
pump fueled by biogas. The amount of water
discharge generated by the water pump, both biogas,
and pertamax, does not differ much. The ratio of the
average time of biogas fuel to Pertamax fuel at
different engine speeds is also not much different [3].
2.2.4 Gasoline Motor Fuel
The biogas produced in the community service
program in Limbangan Village, Banjarnegara
Regency can be used for gasoline fuel. Gasoline
motor fuel with biogas is very potential because of
the high methane content. H2S in high biogas content
can pollute the environment so it needs to be purified
before being used as fuel. Biogas can be purified
using zeolite or using Fe-EDTA (Iron Chelated
Solution). Gas purification in this community service
program uses iron waste from the lathe industry
which is then compressed and put into PVC pipes
[11].
Biogas fuel has a high octane number, namely
130. Gasoline has an octane number of 90 to 94 while
the best alcohol is only 105. This shows that biogas
can be used in engines with high compression ratios
and also prevents the engine from knocking [3]. This
is very beneficial for keeping the vehicle durable.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 528
78
2.3 Environmentally Friendly Utilization Concept
The use of biogas has a role in efforts to preserve
the surrounding environment. Cow dung waste that is
processed into biogas will reduce the unpleasant
smell of livestock dung and prevent the spread of
disease [18]. The use of biogas is also expected to
reduce biomass waste and reduce the level of global
warming [13]. Biogas can also solve environmental
problems, such as soil degradation, deforestation,
CO2 emissions, indoor air pollution, organic
pollution, [19]. The result of burning fuel from biogas
if the result is clean, not smoky like wood charcoal or
firewood [3]. The residual waste from the biogas
processing process can be used as solid and liquid
organic fertilizer to support plant growth [3].
Providing understanding to the community
regarding this matter is of course very necessary to
get more optimal benefits. Things that need to be
done, among others, are to carry out counseling on
the dangers of pollution due to cow dung and
technical construction of biogas installation.
Furthermore, coordinating with cattle breeders to do
the occasional arrangement and direct biogas
installation. The follow-up of the program can be
carried out by giving counseling on the use of biogas
as alternative energy both to replace LPG gas, power
plants, propulsion water pumps and substitute for
gasoline [11].
3. CONCLUSION
Cow dung waste treatment as an alternative
energy source can be used as a substitute for kerosene
and LPG gas, power plants, water pumps, and
gasoline replacement fuel. Utilization of cow dung
has a positive impact on the surrounding environment
because it can reduce environmental pollution and
global warming. It is recommended to provide
education to the public about the utilization of cow
dung to obtain optimal results.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to thank the Science
Education Department, Graduate School Program,
Yogyakarta State University for supporting this
research.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Fathurrohman, M. Aniar Hari S, and M.
Awaludin Adam, “Persepsi peternak sapi dalam
pemanfaatan kotoran sapi menjadi bi-ogas di
Desa Sekarmojo Purwosari Pasuruan,” J. Ilmu-
Ilmu Peternak., 2015.
[2] S. Huda and W. Wikanta, “Pemanfaatan Limbah
Kotoran Sapi Menjadi Pupuk Organik Sebagai
Upaya Mendukung Usaha Peternakan Sapi
Potong di Kelompok Tani Ternak Mandiri Jaya
Desa Moropelang Kecamatan Babat Kabupaten
Lamongan,” AKSIOLOGIYA J. Pengabdi. Kpd.
Masy., 2016.
[3] A. W. Perdana and S. Wahyuni, “Penggunaan
Bahan Bakar Biogas sebagai Energi Penggerak
Mula Pompa Air Model CCWP-30,” Jurnal
Rekayasa Teknologi., 2012.
[4] L. H. Damanik, A. H. Husodo, and T. Gunawan,
“Pemanfaatan Feses Ternak Sapi sebagai Energi
Alternatif Biogas bagi Rumah Tangga dan
Dampaknya Terhadap Lingkungan,” Jurnal
Teknosains., 2014.
[5] Y. Buyang, I. D. Palittin, R. S. Waremra, J. P.
Kimia, J. P. Fisika, and U. Musamus,
“Pengganti Bahan Bakar Minyak Utilization of
Cow Dung as Energy Resource,”,. Dharma
Raflesia Unib,. 2019.
[6] F. Munirah, “Analisis Isi Deskriptif Rubrik ‘ Xp
Re Si Harian Kaltim Post Periode Maret-April
2013,” eJournal Ilmu Komun., 2015.
[7] A. B. Yunanda, G. Sarya, and B. Sutriono,
“Alternatif Pengganti Gas LPG pada Kompor di
Wonosalam,” Jurnal Pengabdian LPPM Untag
Surabaya., 2016.
[8] M. C. Santoso, I. A. D. Giriantari, and W. G.
Ariastina, “Studi Pemanfaatan Kotoran Ternak
untuk Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Biogas di
Bali,” Spektrum., 2019.
[9] M. Agus and K. Budiyanto, “Mendukung
Pertanian Organik di Desa Sumbersari,”
GAMMA., 2011.
[10] H. Insam, M. Gómez-Brandón, and J. Ascher,
“Dung-based biogas fermentation residues -
Friend or foe of soil fertility?,” Soil Biol.
Biochem., 2015.
[11] Sunaryo, “Rancang Bangun Reaktor Biogas
untuk Pemanfaatan Limbah Kotoran Ternak
Sapi di Desa Limbangan Kabupaten
Banjarnegara,” Jurnal Ppkm Unsiq., 2014.
[12] S. y. S. S. Z. B.Satata, “Pemanfaatan Kotoran
Sapi sebagai Sumber Biogas,” J. Udayana
Mengabdi., 2016.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 528
79
[13] R. P. Dewi and M. Kholik, “Kajian Potensi
Pemanfaatan Biogas sebagai Salah Satu Sumber
Energi Alternatif di Wilayah Magelang,” J.
Mech. Eng., 2018.
[14] G. P. Minde, S. S. Magdum, and V.
Kalyanraman, “Biogas as a Sustainable
Alternative for Current Energy Need of India,”
J. Sustain. Energy Environ., 2013.
[15] V. Tumwesige, D. Fulford, and G. C. Davidson,
“Biogas Appliances in Sub-Sahara Africa,”
Biomass and Bioenergy., 2014.
[16] M. Dianawati and S. L. Mulijanti, “Peluang
Pengembangan Biogas Di Sentra Sapi Perah,” J.
Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian., 2016.
[17] A. U. Farahdiba, A. Ramdhaniati, and E. S.
Soedjono, “Teknologi dan Manajemen Program
Biogas sebagai Salah Satu Energi Alternatif
yang Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Malang,” J.
Inovasi dan Kewirausahaan., 2014.
[18] E. R. Orskov, K. Yongabi Anchang, M. Subedi,
and J. Smith, “Overview of Holistic Application
of Biogas for Small Scale Farmers in Sub-
Saharan Africa,” Biomass and Bioenergy., 2014.
[19] M. A. Pereira-Querol, L. Seppänen, and J.
Virkkunen, “Exploring the Developmental
Possibilities of Environmental Activities: On-
Farm Biogas Production,” Environment Science
Policy., 2014.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 528
80
Article
Full-text available
Energy availability is a pivotal driver in fostering sustainable socio-economic development. However, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) grapples with paradoxes headlined by abundant energy resources but with the world’s lowest access to clean energy index per capita. Faced with a lack of access to clean energy sources like electricity, rural areas in the majority of SSA countries almost exclusively depend on biomass-fuels, mostly fuelwood, leading to heightened respiratory health risks as well as environmental degradation and accelerated climate change. As an alternative, this review investigates the potential of animal manure as a sustainable energy resource for rural SSA households, emphasising its utilisation as a feedstock for biogas production using anaerobic digestor technology. Results show that despite the abundance of literature that reports on successes in lab-scale bioreactor optimisation, as well as successes in the initial rollout of biogas biodigester technology in SSA with the help of international collaborators, the actual uptake of biogas bioreactor technology by rural communities remains low, while installed bioreactors are experiencing high failure rates. Resultantly, rural SSA still lags significantly behind in the adoption of sustainable clean energy systems in comparison to rural communities in other regions. Among some of the hurdles identified as driving low technology assimilation are onerous policy requirements, low-level government involvement, high bioreactor-instalment costs, the lack of training and awareness, and water scarcity. Prospects for success lie in innovative technologies like the low-cost portable FlexiBiogas system and private–public partnerships, as well as flexible energy policy frameworks. Bridging the knowledge-implementation gap requires a holistic approach considering cultural, technological, and policy aspects.
Article
Full-text available
Renewable energy (renewable energy) as biogas has become an alternative to the environmental preservation of human energy needs. One potential use of fecal droppings of cattle to produce biogas which can be used as an energy economical, simple, applicable, and very supportive of biological environmental sustainability. Malang, Argosari Village is one area that could potentially use utilize biogas with cow dung stool with household scale. The success of the biogas program contained in Argosari Village can be seen from the aspect of technological, social, and economic with the active participation of government, community, and cadres are involved. Forward Enterprises Farmers Group team as a peasant community in the village of Argosari became the prime mover in accelerating achievement of biogas and improved sanitation program in Malang.
Article
Full-text available
Cattle farming in Indonesia is still concerned with livestock productivity and has not maximized the utilization of cow dung waste (teletong) of economic value. The waste of cow dung (teletong) produced should no longer be a burden of business costs but a result of having high economic value and if possible equivalent to the economic value of the main product (meat). The purpose of this research is to study the utilization of cow dung into organic fertilizer that support the business of fattening beef cattle. The method used in this research is descriptive method with data collection method of observation and interviews of livestock farmer group and supported by literature study. Based on the results of observations and interviews obtained the results that members of Livestock Farmers Group Jaya already utilize and manage the waste of cow dung into organic fertilizer with economic value to sell to members for agricultural land fertilizer rice, watermelon and cantaloupe. The reason for the use of cow dung as fertilizer is usually because the goods are easy to obtain, relatively cheap and give better results.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this research was to know the perception of cattle farmers towards dung utilization as biogas in Sekarmojo village, Purwosari, Pasuruan. The study used qualitative method with phenomenological approach. The data were collected from cattle farmers in Mojo hamlet, Sekar Mojo village, Pasuruan regency through interview, documentation and observation. The result showed that farmers in Sukorejo village did not utilize cow dung as biogas due to lack of knowledge about biogas. Instead of it, they prefered use it directly as fertilizer in their fields. Moreover, there were many negative perceptions such as village myth, expensive cost for biogas installation, worried of failure to sustain the biogas and traumatic of gas explosion. Keywords : biogas, dung, village, farmer, cattle
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable development is a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the rightto meet the needs of future generations. It is used to describe the development of sustainable improvement inthe quality of human life, while trying not to exceed the ability of the ecosystem that supports life. Utilization ofwaste as an alternative source of energy is not yet common, especially the waste that comes in a large capacityfrom farming activities. This is because the waste released into the environment has particular characteristicsand properties, with potential impacts for environmental disadvantage that needs to be done handling back. Thisresearch studied the utilization of cattle feces as an alternative energy of biogas for household and its impact onthe environment in Kepuharjo Village, Cangkringan, Sleman. The results give an overview of how the communityhas responded positively to the use of animal feces biogas as an alternative energy, which proved of value to theutilization of biogas energy savings of 2.50.
Article
Full-text available
p>Kotoran sapi perah yang tidak diolah dengan benar dapat mencemari lingkungan serta memengaruhi produksi dan kualitas susu. Limbah peternakan ini dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai sumber energi alternatif untuk mensubstitusi kebutuhan energi fosil yang semakin meningkat dan ketersediaannya makin terbatas. Biogas merupakan sumber energi terbarukan yang dihasilkan dari proses pengolahan limbah pertanian maupun peternakan. Makalah ini mengulas alternatif pemanfaatan kotoran sapi perah sebagai biogas. Pengolahan kotoran ternak menjadi biogas memberikan banyak manfaat, yakni sebagai sumber energi alternatif, pupuk organik padat maupun cair, dan pakan ternak, serta dapat memperbaiki sanitasi lingkungan. Oleh karena itu, pembuatan biogas perlu dimasyarakatkan terutama di sentra sapi perah. Biogas lebih murah dibandingkan sumber energi lain sehingga peternak lebih baik berinvestasi membangun digester secara swadaya dibandingkan membeli gas elpiji. Pemerintah dapat memberikan subsidi digester kepada peternak sapi perah untuk mengurangi ketergantungan pada elpiji. Perbaikan teknologi biogas, integrasi sistem biogas dengan produksi pupuk organik, serta sosialisasi dan bimbingan teknis produksi dan pemanfaatan biogas dapat memperluas pengembangan biogas di masyarakat. Peminjaman kredit lunak dari pemerintah maupun swasta juga dapat mendorong pengembangan biogas.</p
Article
Full-text available
Per capita energy consumption of India is declining with increasing its population, which has direct impact on national economy. Biogas technology seems promising to attain sustainable energy yields without damaging the environment. Waste management, manure creation, health care and employment foundation are the benefits of biogas system. Use of biogas assures renewable energy supply and balance of green house gases. India is traditionally using biogas since long time but there is need to improve the technology, applications and deployment strategies. Bioenergy centralization in urban and decentralization in rural can help government to minimize both the import of fuel derivatives and solid waste processing cost. The aim is to highlight potential of the technology to bring social and economical sustainability to India. In this review, demand of energy sources, drivers for bioenergy use, economical, social and environmental benefits of biogas regularization in India are described with emphasizing biogas as an ideal sustainable energy source with its potential applications.
Article
In this journal, an analysis is carried out on the use of livestock manure for use as a biogas power plant in Bali Province. The purpose of this analysis is to find out how much potential electrical energy can be obtained from livestock manure to be developed into a biogas power plant in Bali Province. 8 types of livestock are used as analysis material including cattle, buffalo, goats, horses, sheep, pigs, chickens, and ducks. Livestock population data in Bali Province from 2013 to 2017 listed in the Livestock and Animal Health Statistics book obtained from the Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Health (Ministry of Agriculture), is used as the base year of analysis to obtain the average value of the population level of each types of farm animals. The analysis of the total potential of electrical energy is done by calculating the total mass of manure per day, the percentage of dry matter content of each type of manure as well as the biogas that can be produced from each type of livestock according to the standards of the Ministry of Agriculture. The total potential of electrical energy can be obtained from the total amount of biogas produced, where 1 m3 of biogas can be converted into electrical energy of 4,7 kWh. Based on the results of the analysis conducted, the total biogas that can be produced is 246.130,81 m3 of biogas, or if it is converted into electrical energy equivalent to 1.156.814,81 kWh/day or around 1,16 GWh/day from the average total population livestock in Bali Province are 19.183.779 livestock.
Article
The increasing consumption of fossil-based energy especially LPG (Liquid Petroleum Gas) that is not balanced with the availability of energy source, required a development of alternative energy with abundant amount and environmentally friendly. One of alternative energy source feasible to develop is the one from biomass waste that is livestock manure. Magelang becomes one of potential area in Central Jawa as biogas development. Biogas is produced by using digester anaerobically. Magelang has livestock about 142.127 with potency of gas production about 86.690 m3. The resulted biogas production equals to 43.345 kg of LPG or 14.448 of LPG 3 kg which is can fullfill the cooking needs for about 278 households in one year.
Article
Anaerobic digestion of organic residues has the potential to significantly contribute to a shift from fossil to renewable energy. The by-product, anaerobic slurry, does have properties that are different from the undigested material. There are concerns of soil organic matter depletion in soils, enhanced greenhouse gas and odour emissions, and pathogen spread upon production and use of biogas slurries as fertilizer. However, considering the pros and cons, anaerobic digestion of residues does have positive effects for the climate, the environment and for the farmer, compared to the use of undigested matter.
Article
Holistic farming systems provide designs for the whole farm that make long term sustainable use of nutrients, water, labour, finances and energy. In using organic residues to produce energy, and safely recycling the digested residues back into the farming system, a biogas digester could be a central component of many holistic systems. This paper discusses the influence of environmental, socioeconomic and cultural constraints on the use of biogas digesters in holistic farming systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. In higher altitude areas where maintenance of optimal temperature can constrain anaerobic digestion, floating drum or fixed dome digesters are a better option than flexible balloon digesters because they are less susceptible to temperature changes. If water is a key constraint, rainwater harvesting could be used to reduce the additional labour needed to collect water. If energy is the most limiting resource in the farming system, the optimum use of organic residues might be as a fuel for anaerobic digestion, whereas, if water is limiting, energy production by burning or pyrolysis might be a better option. The bioslurry from anaerobic digestion can be used in fish ponds to produce plankton to feed fish, and can be applied to fertile fields and fields of intermediate fertility, while biochar from pyrolysis is better used to improve the soil in infertile fields. If labour is limiting, it is particularly important that the system design minimises any additional labour needed to process the organic residues on a daily basis, considering trade-offs between labour and other resources.