ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) posted a devastating global health crisis. Very little is known about this virus that it is difficult to find treatments of this novel virus. The vaccine that can potentially combat this virus is under works hence, the repurposing of existing medical treatments such as chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) could be a possible treatment. CPM is a safe and effective antihistamine with potent antiviral activity against various strains of influenza A/B, thus highlighting its great antiviral potential. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a droplet mode transmission with a notably high viral load especially the nose. Several studies postulated that the nose is possibly the primary route of entry of SARS-CoV-2 owing to the high expression of Angiotensin 2 converting enzyme receptors. We hypothesize that utilizing (CPM) nasal spray as an adjunct treatment to COVID-19 patients and reduce their clinical course and hasten their time to negativization via RT-PCR via nasopharyngeal swab. We present four symptomatic patients with mild-moderate risks. CPM nasal spray was added to their current supportive treatment. All four patients showed rapid improvement of their clinical symptoms with a shorter than average time to negativization on repeat nasopharyngeal swab via RT-PCR. No safety issues were encountered during the course of treatment. Given its years of excellent safety profile with remarkable clinical results as shown in this case series, we conclude that CPM nasal spray may be a potential adjunct treatment option in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms.
Research Article
Journal of
Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology
J
o
u
r
n
a
l
o
f
C
l
i
n
i
c
a
l
&
E
x
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
h
a
r
m
a
c
o
l
o
g
y
ISSN: 2161-1459
OPEN
ACCESS Freely available online
J Clin Exp Pharmacol, Vol.10 Iss. 2 No: 275 1
ABSTRACT
The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) posted a devastating global health crisis. Very
little is known about this virus that it is difficult to find treatments of this novel virus. The vaccine that can potentially combat
this virus is under works hence, the repurposing of existing medical treatments such as chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM)
could be a possible treatment. CPM is a safe and effective antihistamine with potent antiviral activity against various strains of
influenza A/B, thus highlighting its great antiviral potential.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a droplet mode transmission with a notably high viral load especially the nose.
Several studies postulated that the nose is possibly the primary route of entry of SARS-CoV-2 owing to the high expression
of Angiotensin 2 converting enzyme receptors. We hypothesize that utilizing (CPM) nasal spray as an adjunct treatment to
COVID-19 patients and reduce their clinical course and hasten their time to negativization via RT-PCR via nasopharyngeal
swab. We present four symptomatic patients with mild-moderate risks. CPM nasal spray was added to their current supportive
treatment. All four patients showed rapid improvement of their clinical symptoms with a shorter than average time to
negativization on repeat nasopharyngeal swab via RT-PCR. No safety issues were encountered during the course of treatment.
Given its years of excellent safety profile with remarkable clinical results as shown in this case series, we conclude that CPM
nasal spray may be a potential adjunct treatment option in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms.
Key words: COVID19; Intranasal; Chlorpheniramine maleate; Therapeutics; Nasal spray; SARS-CoV-2
Chlorpheniramine Maleate Nasal Spray In COVID-19 Patients: Case
Series
Joselit Torres1, Camille Celeste Go2, Farah Chohan2, Genesis Camacho L2, Marcos A Sanchez-Gonzalez1, Gustavo
Ferrer2,3*
1Institute of Immunodiagnosis. Urb. El Rosal, Caracas, Venezuela; 2Division of Research & Academic Affairs, Larkin Health System, South
Miami, Florida, USA; 3Aventura Pulmonary Institute, Miami, Florida, USA; 4Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
*Correspondence to: Gustavo Ferrer, Aventura Pulmonary Institute, Miami, Florida, USA, Tel: +1954482-474; E-mail: gferrer@pulmonary-institute.com
Received: January 08, 2021; Accepted: January 23, 2021; Published: January 30, 2021
Citation: Torres J, Go CC, Chohan F, Genesis Camacho L2, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA, Ferrer G (2021) Chlorpheniramine Maleate Nasal Spray In COVID-19
Patients: Case Series. J Clin Exp Pharmacol. 10:275. doi: 10.35248/2161-1459.21.10.275
Copyright: ©2021 Torres J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
INTRODUCTION
The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2) or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led the
World Health Organization to recognize it as a global pandemic in
March 2020 [1].
There are no effective chemo-prophylactic drugs against SARS-
CoV-2 so the main intervention strategy is the control of
transmission. Scientists had to find alternative treatments, with
clinical trials focused on investigating potential therapeutic agents
and repurposing existing treatments.
Nasopharynx has been recognized as the port of entry of SARS-
CoV-2 and has a high viral shedding from the nasal cavity before
and after onset. [2] Nasal secretions are swept by rapid nasociliary
clearance into the oropharynx and aspirated into the lower
respiratory tract [3].
On the basis of a previously published case report, this study
is focused on understanding the potential effectiveness of
chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) in suppressing the replication of
SARS-CoV-2 in the nose [4].
In a study conducted in vitro and in animal models by Xu et
al, carbinoxamine maleate (CAM) and S-(+)-chlorpheniramine
maleate (SCM) showed potent antiviral activity against influenza A
strains and one influenza B strain and protection from potentially
lethal avian H7N9 influenza virus. By penetrating the blood-brain
barrier, they inhibit the influenza virus by targeting the early stage
of virus life cycle, and its entry into the host cells. Additionally, they
can be used prophylactically in healthy individuals for prevention
of influenza virus infection [5].
We aim to utilize existing medications, particularly CPM nasal
spray, for reducing the clinical course of the disease and decrease
Ferrer G, et al.
OPEN
ACCESS Freely available online
2J Clin Exp Pharmacol, Vol.10 Iss. 2 No: 275
but with mild presentation of nasal symptoms and persistent eye
pain. On day 6, she reported mild eye pain. On day 7, her sense of
smell completely recovered. She was retested on day 7 and tested
negative. She returned to baseline health on day 14.
Case 4
A young adult white female, with history of chronic rhinitis treated
with desloratadine. She tested positive for COVID-19 on October
2020. She is a non-smoker, with no surgical history. She reported
fatigue, restless, runny, itchy and stuffy nose, anosmia and eye pain,
fatigue, shortness of breath with minimum physical activity, eye
pain, runny nose, anosmia, ageusia and diarrhea two days prior.
A consultation was followed by a COVID-19 RT-PCR test which
was positive. She was enrolled in this case series and was given the
experimental treatment. On day 1, she complained of a stuffy nose,
anosmia, ageusia, tiredness, cough, and congestion. She reported
mild symptoms on SAS, rated generalized pain as nine on the VAS
and the NRS. She had diarrhea on day 3 and 4. Improvement of
symptoms was noted on day 7 and a repeat COVID-19 RT-PCR via
nasopharyngeal swab was done with negative results. She reported
return to baseline health by day 14.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The above-mentioned cases are showing the potential efficacy of
utilizing CPM containing nasal spray as a possible adjunct treatment
against COVID-19 and augment the time to negativization on
nasal RT-PCR. Although this does not guarantee definite proof
of efficacy, this case series provides a framework for initiating a
broader scope randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial in the
potential efficacy of chlorpheniramine nasal spray in COVID-19
patients.
Patients in this study reported several risk factors that could
potentially increase morbidity and mortality in COVID-19
infected individuals. Patient 1 was an elderly, with hypertension
and asthma, patient 2, 3 and 4 had chronic rhinitis and sinusitis.
These patients had more than average risk of morbidity and
mortality of COVID-19. [6] All patients had a benign course of
disease and all showed improvement of symptoms with the use of
chlorpheniramine.
Patients were asked to spray two puffs of CPM nasal spray per
nostrils two times per day for seven days. A study conducted on
SARS-cov-2 stock to highlight the virucidal potential of CPM
showed a reduction of 99.7% in viral load in Vero 76 infected
cells [7].
Mostafa et al in a study on FDA approved drugs that have antiviral
activity against SARS-CoV-2 concluded that besides antimicrobial
drugs like Azithromycin, Niclosamide, and Nitazoxanide, several
antihistamines and anti-inflammatory drugs could reduce SARS-
CoV-2 replication. CPM, a competitive histamine H1 receptor
antagonist, exhibited strong virucidal activity against a variety of
influenza viruses [8].
In addition, CPM is generally safe and effective for use with the
main side effect being drowsiness. A study also reviewed the
systemic bioavailability and overall safety of a nasal spray solution
that delivers doses of 1.12 and 2.24 mg CPM intranasally (0.4%
nasal spray) and has found no adverse events [9].
Lastly, the improvement of symptoms and time to negative PCR test
are important to highlight. A study conducted by Vaira, L.A. found
the time to negativization.
This case series will show how four COVID-19 positive patients
enrolled in a study utilizing CPM nasal spray showed positive
outcomes. All patients have expressed written informed consents.
CASE PRESENTATION
Case 1
An elderly white female, with hypertension with unknown
treatment and asthma treated with desloratadine and albuterol,
tested positive for COVID-19 in September 202. The patient is
a non-smoker, no past surgical history. After testing positive with
COVID-10, she was enrolled in this case series and was given the
experimental treatment. She was instructed to spray two puffs
of CPM nasal spray per nostrils twice a day for seven days. She
continued to use albuterol as needed, and supportive treatment.
She was followed for seven days and was assessed for symptoms.
On day 1, she complained of waking up at night due to the cough,
fever and diarrhea, runny, itchy and stuffy nose, sandy sensation
in her eyes, chest pain, anosmia, ageusia, fatigue, cough. She had
mild symptoms most of the time on Symptoms Assessment Score
(SAS). She rated generalized pain as nine on the Visual Analogue
Score (VAS) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). On day 2,
oxygenation was 91%. On day 4, she noted improvement in her
runny, itchy and stuffy nose. On day 6, VAS was reported as three.
She also had mild to nonexistent congestion. Although mild
anosmia was still present, it was markedly improved compared to
day 1. She remained afebrile after the fourth day of the trial. She
was tested via nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR and tested negative
on day 7. A follow-up was done on day 14 and reported return to
baseline health.
Case 2
A young adult white woman with chronic rhinitis and sinusitis
treated with cetirizine, tested positive for COVID-19 in September
2020. She is a non-smoker with no past surgical history. Three
days prior, she started experiencing runny and stuffy nose,
itchy and painful eyes, anosmia, chest pain, fatigue and fever at
102.2 Fahrenheit (F). She also reported difficulty in sleep due to
nasal symptoms and has been using albuterol as needed. Upon
consultation, she was tested for COVID-19 RT-PCR via the
nasopharyngeal swab. Following the positive test, she was enrolled
in the case series experimental group. On day 1, she complained
of stuffy nose, sneezing, congestion, sandy and watery eyes, fever
102.2ºF, anosmia, and eye pain. she reported fever 100.4º (F)
and mid-effort shortness of breath that was worse on day 3 when
saturation was 92%. On Day 4, she was afebrile and was able to
smell strong substances. On day 7, she reported all the symptoms
were mild or non-existent. Repeat nasal swab RT-PCR was negative.
She returned to baseline health on Day 14.
Case 3
An elderly Hispanic female, with history of chronic rhinitis and
allergies treated with cetirizine, tested positive for COVID-19
in October 2020. She is a non-smoker with no past surgical
history reported. She sought consult on day 3 and was tested
for COVID-19 via nasal swab RT-PCR with positive results. On
day 1, she had runny and stuffy nose, anosmia, tiredness, itchy
and painful eyes and mild cough. Normal oxygen saturation was
detected. On day 3, she noticed an improvement of symptoms
Ferrer G, et al.
OPEN
ACCESS Freely available online
3J Clin Exp Pharmacol, Vol.10 Iss. 2 No: 275
that olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions are common symptoms
in COVID-19 patients. [9] Furthermore, Al-Ani RM et al. also
highlighted that patients who have nasal and paranasal problems
have longer time in recovery from the smell because of interference
with air current from reaching the olfactory epithelium to the roof
of the nose. [10] Spethet. Al also stated that patients with allergic
rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and asthma, have increased severity
in symptoms. [11] In our study, resolution of symptoms was notable
as early as Day 4 with no progression to severity. Furthermore,
when patients were tested via nasal RT-PCR on Day 7, all of them
tested negative, a 50 % reduction to negativization compared to
the average 14-day course of the disease [12].
In summary, the cases reported in this case series, who have minimal
to moderate morbidity and mortality risk from COVID-19 showed
significant improvement in symptoms and a 50% reduction in
the clinical course with the use of CPM nasal spray. This could
potentially pave the way in improving clinical outcome and reduce
clinical burden in areas heavily affected with COVID-19. We
recommend a larger randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials
which could further shed light on this potential treatment.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declared that they do not have any conflict of interest.
FUNDING
Not applicable
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
T.J, G.F. are the one who conceptualized and gathered the data.
C.C.G, F.C, G.C.L and M.S.G collated and analyzed the data
for this case series. All authors have equal contribution with this
paper. All authors agreed to the final manuscript and submission
of this case report.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
None.
REFERENCES
1. Grech V, Cuschieri S. COVID-19: A global and continental overview
of the second wave and its (relatively) attenuated case fatality ratio
[published online ahead of print, 2020 Oct 3]. Early Hum Dev.
2020;105211.
2. Cegolon L, Javanbakht M, Mastrangelo G. Nasal disinfection for the
prevention and control of COVID-19: A scoping review on potential
chemo-preventive agents [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug
18]. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;230:113605.
3. Lipworth B, Chan R, Rui Wen Kuo C. COVID-19: Start with the
nose. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:1214.
4. Go CC, Pandav K, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA, Ferrer G. Potential Role
of Xylitol Plus Grapefruit Seed Extract Nasal Spray Solution in
COVID-19: Case Series. Cureus. 2020;12:e11315.
5. Xu W, Xia S, Pu J, Wang Q, Li P, Lu L, et al. The Antihistamine Drugs
Carbinoxamine Maleate and Chlorpheniramine Maleate Exhibit
Potent Antiviral Activity Against a Broad Spectrum of Influenza
Viruses. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2643.
6. Jian L, Yi W, Zhang N, Wen W, Krysko O, Song WJ, et al. Perspective:
COVID-19, implications of nasal diseases and consequences for their
management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:67-69.
7. Westover JB, Ferrer G, Vazquez H, Bethencourt-Mirabal A, Go CC.
In Vitro Virucidal Effect of Intranasally Delivered Chlorpheniramine
Maleate Compound Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Coronavirus 2. Cureus. 2020;12.
8. Mostafa A, Kandeil A, AMM Elshaier Y, Kutkat O, Moatasim Y,
Rashad AA, et al. FDA-Approved Drugs with Potent In Vitro Antiviral
Activity against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
2. Pharmaceuticals. 2020; 13:443.
9. Vaira LA, Deiana G, Fois AG, Pirina P, Madeddu G, De Vito A, et al.
Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients:
Single-center experience on 72 cases. Head Neck. 2020;42:1252-1258.
10. Al-Ani RM, Acharya D. Prevalence of Anosmia and Ageusia in Patients
with COVID-19 at a Primary Health Center, Doha, Qatar [published
online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 19]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2020;1-7.
11. Speth MM, Singer-Cornelius T, Oberle M, Gengler I, Brockmeier
SJ, Sedaghat AR, et al. Olfactory Dysfunction and Sinonasal
Symptomatology in COVID-19: Prevalence, Severity, Timing,
and Associated Characteristics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2020;163:114-120.
12. Walsh KA, Jordan K, Clyne B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load
and infectivity over the course of an infection. J Infect. 2020;81:357-
371.
... CPM is mainly taken orally in the form of tablets [1], but other routes of administration include intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes [1]. The benefits of administering CPM via nasal spray are currently under investigation for the indication of allergic rhinitis and, owing to its potent antiviral properties, against the SARS-CoV-2 virus [9,10]. Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, old and costeffective drugs like CPM, which are readily available in the market, need to be further explored. ...
... Alternatively, studies have shown that CPM could also be used intranasally [9,10,15,16]. In addition, in a study by Van Toor, the systemic bioavailability of this drug at high doses (8 mg and higher) through intranasal administration was found to be comparable to that of the tablet [16]. ...
... Recently, antihistamines, including CPM, have been proposed as one of the drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 [36]. It has been studied that in patients who have minimal to moderate morbidity and mortality risk from COVID-19, the use of CPM nasal spray is associated with significant improvement in symptoms and a 50% reduction in the clinical course of the disease [10]. Moreover, in a retrospective study, treating COVID-19 patients with CPM and azithromycin during the early course of the disease generated positive clinical outcomes [64]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chlorpheniramine Maleate (CPM), also known as chlorphenamine, is a potent alkylamine first-generation H1 antihistamine that has been around since the 1950s. CPM is a widely popular drug commonly used to treat allergic conditions, given its antihistamine properties. Although mainly used in over-the-counter treatment for cough and colds, various studies discuss a wide range of CPM's clinical uses, such as treating asthma, plasma cell gingivitis, chronic urticaria, depression, among others. This antihistamine is usually taken orally; however, intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes have been documented. Intranasal routes have recently been explored, especially due to its antiviral properties against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Accordingly, given CPM's extensive medical and safety profile, the present review explores this versatile drug's current and potential clinical applications. Although it is widely used mainly for treating common colds and aforementioned allergic conditions, it can be concluded that CPM can be considered to be used for other clinical indications. The repurposing of CPM for other clinical indications such as COVID-19 needs to be further explored through more extensive studies.
... Chlorpheniramine maleate has been hypothesized to exert antiviral effects through its ability to block histamine release and inhibit mast cell degranulation, which plays a role in the inflammatory response seen in viral infections [26,27]. Studies have shown its virucidal activity against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, suggesting potential for broader antiviral use [28,29]. However, further studies are needed to conclusively establish its efficacy as an antiviral agent in clinical settings. ...
... Two randomized clinical trials, known as the ACCROS trials, were conducted on mildly symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients. These trials demonstrated that intranasal chlorpheniramine maleate (iCPM) was more effective than placebo in accelerating clinical recovery and reducing upper respiratory symptoms to less than three days, with conversion to negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results in four days [11,29]. Here, our findings support those participants who received the Chlorpheniramine Nasal Spray had significantly fewer long-term post-COVID symptoms. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the end of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) global public health emergency on May 5, 2023, but its long-term consequences have still been haunting the global population. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and long-term COVID-19 are serious concerns and present with various symptoms. Intranasal chlorpheniramine (iCPM) has been shown to decrease the viral burden of SARS-COV-2. iCPM uses decreased COVID-19 disease progression and severity in Accelerating COVID-19 Clinical Recovery in an Outpatient Setting (ACROSS)-I & III randomized control trials (RCT). Methods This prospective survey study included 259 participants in ACROSS I and III RCTs. We compared the effect of iCPM versus placebo on the reduction of PASC symptoms. A PASC questionnaire containing 17 questions regarding the most common PASC symptoms was used in this study. T-test and Pearson chi-square statistics were performed according to continuous and categorical data using STATA 17.0 Basic Edition software. Findings The iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with fatigue or tiredness vs. placebo (0 Vs 17, 21, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with difficulty concentrating or mental confusion (0 vs. 22, 27, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had also a lower number of patients with difficulty in the ability to perform daily activities or work vs. placebo (1 Vs 38, 48, p < 0.001). A smaller number of patients in the iCPM cohort sought medical attention for PACS symptoms compared to placebo (0 vs. 48, 68, p < 0.001). Interpretation The use of intranasal chlorpheniramine shows promise in preventing COVID-19 progression to the often-debilitating post-COVID-19 syndrome PASC. The association between iCPM use and a lower prevalence of PASC symptoms is strong. Further studies are needed to establish the role of ICPM in preventing PASC.
... It is worth noting that several studies have demonstrated CPM's antiviral activity against respiratory viruses such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (Black, 2022; A. Westover et al., 2020;Xu et al., 2018). Furthermore, early clinical studies have indicated CPM's effectiveness in treating COVID-19 (Black, 2022;Morán Blanco et al., 2021;Sanchez-Gonzalez et al., 2022;Torres et al., 2021). Our research team has also reported on the safety and efficacy of intranasally administered CPM for the treatment of COVID-19 and allergic rhinitis Sanchez-Gonzalez et al., 2022). ...
Preprint
Chlorpheniramine Maleate (CPM) has been identified as a potential antiviral compound against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, we investigated the in vitro effects of CPM on key stages of the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle, including viral adsorption, replication inhibition, and virucidal activity. Our findings demonstrate that CPM exhibits antiviral properties by interfering with viral adsorption, replication, and directly inactivating the virus. Molecular docking analysis revealed interactions between CPM and essential viral proteins, such as the main protease receptor, spike protein receptor, and RNA polymerase. CPM’s interactions were primarily hydrophobic in nature, with an additional hydrogen bond formation in the RNA polymerase active site. These results suggest that CPM has the potential to serve as a multitarget antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other respiratory viruses. Further investigations are warranted to explore its clinical implications and assess its efficacy in vivo.
... (16) b) Se deben fomentar los antihistamínicos intranasales ya que estos también pueden conferir cierta protección antiviral. (17,18,19,20) c) El uso simultáneo intranasal de corticosteroides y antihistamínicos también puede ser de valor terapéutico en casos graves de RA. (21) Estabilizadores intranasales de mastocitos como el cromoglicato de sodio y el nedocromil sódico son de gran utilidad. (22) 3. Se deben considerar los fármacos sistémicos en casos seleccionados, de acuerdo con la clínica y el criterio médico a) Estabilizador de mastocitos ketotifeno tableta, 10 mg. ...
Article
Full-text available
Allergic rhinitis has been increasing in Latin American countries, leading to a growing population of patients who need medical treatment for this respiratory condition. Its similarity to COVID-19 in terms of symptoms and the possibility of concurrence with it, make allergic rhinitis of particular interest to health systems. The countries of Latin America and the Caribbean have been particularly vulnerable due to multiple challenges, including high poverty rates, limited access to medical care and limitations in the provision of basic health services, as well as the absence of guidelines of treatment for allergic rhinitis in a pandemic situation. With the aim of to provide essential management for multidisciplinary teams in Latin America and the Caribbean regarding the evaluation and treatment of allergic rhinitis during the COVID-19 pandemic, published scientific literature on the treatment of allergic rhinitis and COVID-19 was reviewed, and the opinion of leading professionals from scientific societies in the region was considered. The different measures to avoid infections and the different treatment strategies were analyzed, with an emphasis on intranasal therapy and treatment with allergy vaccines. A position statement was formulated with the intention of maintaining continuity of medical service in the context of a pandemic and minimizing the spread, infection and complication associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in patients undergoing or starting treatment for allergic rhinitis.
... Mounting evidence suggests that CPM has both antiviral and anti-in ammatory actions that could be bene cial in treating COVID-19 [11,[18][19][20]29]. Furthermore, molecular modeling and preliminary clinical data analyzed the antiviral activity of CPM, comparing the chemical structure of different over-the-counter drugs. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Purpose: Our group demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and antiviral effect of intranasally administered Chlorpheniramine Maleate (CPM) for treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since the nasal cavity is the portal of entry for COVID pathogens, sensory and upper respiratory symptoms (URS) (e.g., cough, ageusia, anosmia, nasal congestion, etc.) are significant symptoms in the course of the disease. Intranasal therapies could alleviate the disease-induced URS faster. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of intranasal CPM for treating mild to moderate COVID-19-induced URS in the outpatient setting. Methods: The two-part Accelerating COVID-19 Clinical Recovery in an Outpatient Setting (ACCROS) research study was conducted to collect evidence from a randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (ACCROS-I). Both parts enrolled patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The primary endpoint in ACCROS-I was time to clinical recovery, defined as the change from baseline to day 7 in COVID-19 symptoms reported as the percent change (Δ%) in the daily symptoms score (DSS) and the severity of the disease symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS), on a scale of 1-10 (10=worst symptoms). COVID-19 patients (n = 101) were recruited and assigned to either a 10-day CPM treatment (n=61) or placebo (PLB) (n=40) in addition to standard of care (SoC). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of hospitalization and the proportion of patients with URS on day 7. ACCROS-II data were collected from medical records of COVID-positive subjects using a standardized form. Cohorts of patients treated with CPM and SoC (CPM+Soc) were compared for the duration of general symptoms and URS. Patient information was collected as part of routine visits and telehealth consultations. Results ACCROS-I: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clinical recovery (P<0.05) in Δ%DSS (M -18.8±SEM 7.9%) and Δ%VAS (-8.6±5.1%), such that the CPM group reported fewer symptoms than PLB. The proportion of patients who reported sensory deficits and URS at day 7 was significantly lower (P<0.05) in CPM vs. PLB for ageusia (1.7% vs. 15.0%), cough (16.4% vs. 35.0%) and nasal congestion (8.1%vs.20%). None of the patients required hospitalization. ACCROS-II: There was a statistically significant reduction (P<0.05) in total days reporting URS for general symptoms of COVID-19 in CPM+SoC (5.1 ± 0.1) compared to SoC (11.0 ± 0.2). CPM+SoC users also showed fewer days with cough, anosmia, and ageusia. Persistent anosmia (over 29 days) was found in 3% of the patients on SoC, whereas no persistent anosmia was reported in the CPM+SoC cohort (X² = 10.18; P<0.001). Conclusion: The result of this two-part study supports the conclusion that intranasal CPM is an antiviral agent that can be administered intranasally to treat COVID-19-induced symptoms effectively. Intranasal CPM accelerates clinical recovery and reduces URS in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. This study's important implications include individuals returning to daily life faster, reducing community and individual economic burden, and decreasing healthcare utilization. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov.; ID: NCT05449405 ACCROS-I retrospectively registered on 7/13/2022, NCT05520944 ACCROS-R retrospectively registered on 08/27/2022.
Article
Full-text available
(1) Background: Drug repositioning is an unconventional drug discovery approach to explore new therapeutic benefits of existing drugs. Currently, it emerges as a rapid avenue to alleviate the COVID-19 pandemic disease. (2) Methods: Herein, we tested the antiviral activity of anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, commonly prescribed to relieve respiratory symptoms, against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the viral causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. (3) Results: Of these FDA-approved antimicrobial drugs, Azithromycin, Niclosamide, and Nitazoxanide showed a promising ability to hinder the replication of a SARS-CoV-2 isolate, with IC50 of 0.32, 0.16, and 1.29 µM, respectively. We provided evidence that several antihistamine and anti-inflammatory drugs could partially reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Furthermore, this study showed that Azithromycin can selectively impair SARS-CoV-2 replication, but not the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). A virtual screening study illustrated that Azithromycin, Niclosamide, and Nitazoxanide bind to the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 (Protein data bank (PDB) ID: 6lu7) in binding mode similar to the reported co-crystalized ligand. Also, Niclosamide displayed hydrogen bond (HB) interaction with the key peptide moiety GLN: 493A of the spike glycoprotein active site. (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that Piroxicam should be prescribed in combination with Azithromycin for COVID-19 patients.
Article
Full-text available
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has created an unprecedented impact on healthcare globally. Being a novel virus, several treatments have been explored against COVID-19. During the early stages of the disease, treatment is mainly supportive. While several studies have suggested different treatment modalities, there is still no definitive treatment against COVID-19. Re-purposing already established medications, with excellent safety profiles, is a possible approach for treating the disease in its early stage. Having a mode of transmission as a droplet mode, several studies have supported how the nose can contain the primary route of entry of SARS-CoV-2. Hence, we postulated that re-purposing a commercially available nasal spray containing xylitol and grapefruit seed extract (GSE), namely Xlear Nasal Spray® (Xlear, Inc., American Fork, USA) could be used as an adjunct treatment of COVID-19. With a well-established safety profile, the components of this nasal spray have been studied and have been shown to have potential efficacy against viral pathogens, including coronavirus, and may potentially regulate pathways important in the initial entry of infection, replication, and systemic response to SARS-CoV-2. We present a series of three mild-moderate risks, symptomatic, COVID-19 patients, treated with the intranasal combination, as an adjuvant to their ongoing treatment, with rapid clinical improvement and shorten time to negativization on repeat intranasal swab test via PCR. No safety issues were noted during the course of treatment. Xlear nasal spray, containing xylitol plus GSE, given its established safety profile and compelling clinical results described here, could be a potential adjunct treatment option in mild-moderate COVID-19 cases.
Article
Full-text available
Background The initial global outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) pandemic, which is responsible for the severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2), shares similarities with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and behaves similarly to influenza with a high intranasal viral load. The genome sequence of COVID-19 opened the opportunity for multiple in vitro and clinical trials, but we still do not have a clear path to treatment. Chlorpheniramine maleate (CPM) is a safe and effective antihistamine with potent antiviral activity against various strains of influenza A/B, thus suggesting that CPM has broad antiviral activity. We tested the virucidal potential of CPM in a nasal spray composition currently in development as an anti-allergy medication. Methods The virucidal activity of CPM was tested using viral stock of SARS-CoV-2, USA-WA1/2020 strain in Vero 76 infected cells. The endpoint titer 50% cell culture infection dose (CCID50) values were calculated using the Reed-Muench (1948) equation. Three independent replicates of each sample were tested, and the average and standard deviation were calculated. Results were compared with untreated controls using one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test in GraphPad Prism (version 8) software. Results After 25 minutes of contact time, the nasal spray reduced the levels of the virus from 4.2 to 1.7 log10 CCID50 per 0.1 mL, a statistically significant 2.5 log reduction value or 99.7% reduction in the viral load. Conclusions This study demonstrates the strong virucidal effect against SARS-CoV-2 of a nasal spray containing CPM. Given that CPM has broad antiviral effects against influenza and virucidal effect against SARS-CoV-2, we propose two further studies: a randomized placebo-controlled study of intranasally delivered chlorpheniramine in patients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 and a second study aiming to determine the potential antiviral and adjuvant effects of CPM plus hydroxychloroquine, versus hydroxychloroquine alone, in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2.
Article
Full-text available
Loss of smell and taste are common complaints in patients with the COVID-19 disease. These symptoms may present alone or with other symptoms. It is of utmost importance to know their rates of occurrence for better controlling of the infection. The aim of the study was to detect the prevalence of anosmia and ageusia in individuals with COVID-19 in Al-Wajbah Primary Health Center, Doha, Qatar. This retrospective study was conducted at Al-Wajbah Primary Health Center, Doha, Qatar. The study covered the two-month period -May and June 2020. The proven cases of COVID-19 by real-time PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) were enrolled in the study. Data regarding the age, gender, symptomatology including anosmia and ageusia, history of recent travel, smoking, past history of nasal and paranasal diseases (NPND), and severity of the disease were taken from the patients’ records. IBM- SPSS version 22 statistical software was used for the analysis of the data. Out of 141, 35 (24.82%) subject presented with anosmia, ageusia or both. Most of the patients were from age group > 30 year (n = 104, 73.76%) with nearly equal gender. The majority of the individuals were without history of recent travel (92.2%) and smoking (80.14%). Three-quarters of the patients were asymptomatic, and 51.06% with a past history of NPND. The male sex, history of recent travel, smoking, and severe course of the disease were positive, highly significant association with anosmia or ageusia. All patients returned to their normal smell and taste sensations within a mean duration of 6.89 days. Loss of taste and smell were common symptomatology of COVID-19 disease. The males, recent travel, smoking, and severe course of the disease were risk factors of the anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 cases.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Olfactory dysfunction (OD)—hyposmia or anosmia—is a symptom of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We sought to better determine prevalence, severity, and timing of OD in COVID-19 relative to other sinonasal and pulmonary symptoms. Study Design Prospective, cross-sectional. Setting Regional/cantonal hospital. Subjects In total, 103 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–based testing. Methods All patients testing positive for COVID-19 at Kantonsspital Aarau over a 6-week period were approached. Timing and severity (at its worst, on scale of 0 [none], 1 [mild], 2 [moderate], and 3 [severe]) of OD, loss of taste, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea/mucus production, fever, cough and shortness of breath (SOB) were assessed for each patient. Results Prevalence of OD was 61.2%, and severity of OD was strongly correlated with severity of loss of taste experienced (ρ = 0.87, P < .001). OD was experienced on the first day of COVID-19 by 8.7% and overall occurred at median infection day 3 (mean, 3.4; range, 0-12). Most experiencing OD reported anosmia, and mean severity of all with OD was moderate to severe (mean [SD], 2.7 [0.6]). Nasal obstruction (49.5%) and rhinorrhea (35.0%) were frequently reported but not correlated with OD. SOB was more severe in patients with OD. OD was associated negatively with older age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = .007) and positively with female sex (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 0.98-6.19; P = .056). Conclusions OD is highly prevalent during COVID-19, occurring early and severely, often in conjunction with loss of taste. OD is associated negatively with older age and positively with female sex. Patients with OD may also experience more severe SOB.
Article
Introduction COVID-19 is pandemic. International travel bans in March 2020 dampened viral spread and resulted in an overnight global economic crisis. As countries ease travel and social distancing restrictions, viral resurgences are expected. This study was carried out in order to delineate the development of a second wave of COVID-19 cases and deaths due to lockdown easements in June–July 2020. Methods Publically available data for daily new cases and deaths from December 2019 to September 2020 was obtained from “Our World In Data” website and analysed with Pearson correlation. Results At global level, both datasets exhibited three distinct time periods. Cases rose to mid-April, plateaued till mid-May then rose again. Almost all of the slopes in these three time periods were statistically significant. Deaths followed a similar three-part pattern, albeit more pronounced, with values lagging circa one week after new cases and a middle time period when numbers (of deaths) actually decreased, with all periods exhibiting significant slopes. At continent level, for new cases, Asia rose steadily, Europe is increasing again, the Americas and Africa are declining. Deaths follow a similar pattern. Oceania shows a bimodal pattern, with a first and second wave of cases shortly followed by deaths in a similar pattern. The monthly ratio of detected cases to deaths (case fatality ratio) initially rose to 0.08, then fell to 0.02. Conclusion The world is in its second wave of COVID-19, with fortunately reduced case fatality ratios.
Article
Background Neither pre-exposure nor post-exposure chemo-prophylaxis agents are currently available to prevent COVID-19. On the other hand, high loads of SARS-CoV-2 are shed from the nasal cavity before and after symptoms onset. Objective To conduct a scoping review on the available evidence on tolerable nasal disinfectants with encouraging health outcomes against SARS-CoV-2, i.e., agents effective against at least two different viruses beyond SARS-CoV-2. Methods Online databases were searched to identify papers published during 2010–2020. Publications were selected if they were relevant to the scoping review. The review was narrative, describing for each treatment the mechanism(s) of action, tolerability, in vitro and in vivo evidence of the effects against SARS-CoV-2 and whether the product had been marketed. Results Eight treatments were scrutinized: hypothiocyanite, lactoferrin, N-chlorotaurine, interferon-alpha, povidone-iodine, quaternary ammonium compounds, alcohol-based nasal antiseptics and hydroxychloroquine. In vitro viricidal effect against SARS-CoV-2 was reported for povidone-iodine. Inhibition of other coronaviruses was described for lactoferrin, hydroxychloroquine and quaternary ammonium compound. No treatment has been tested against SARS-CoV-2 in randomized controlled clinical trials thus far. However, interferon-alpha, lactoferrin and hydroxychloroquine were tested in one-arm open label uncontrolled clinical trials. Oxidant activity (hypothiocyanite, N-chlorotaurine and povidone-iodine), enhancement of endocytic and lysosomal pH (quaternary ammonium compounds and hydroxychloroquine) and destruction of the viral capsid (quaternary ammonium compounds, alcohol-based nasal antiseptics) were the main mechanisms of action. Lactoferrin and interferon-alpha had subtle biological mechanisms. With the exception of N-chlorotaurine, the others are products available on the market. Conclusions Effective and safe chemo-prophylactic drugs against SARS-CoV-2 do not exist yet but most eligible candidates are already in the market. Whilst the human nasal cavity is the port of entry for SARS-CoV-2, the mouth is involved as exit site through emission of respiratory droplets. The well-known hand-to-nose-to-hand cycle of contamination requires appropriate additional strategies for infection control. To narrow down the subsequent laboratory and clinical investigations, a case-control approach could be employed to compare the use of candidate drugs among individuals testing positive and negative to COVID-19 swabs.
Article
Objectives To summarise the evidence on the detection pattern and viral load of SARS-CoV-2 over the course of an infection (including any asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic phase), and the duration of infectivity. Methods A systematic literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Europe PubMed Central and EMBASE from 30 December 2019 to 12 May 2020. Results We identified 113 studies conducted in 17 countries. The evidence from upper respiratory tract samples suggests that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 peaks around symptom onset or a few days thereafter, and becomes undetectable about two weeks after symptom onset; however, viral loads from sputum samples may be higher, peak later and persist for longer. There is evidence of prolonged virus detection in stool samples, with unclear clinical significance. No study was found that definitively measured the duration of infectivity; however, patients may not be infectious for the entire duration of virus detection, as the presence of viral ribonucleic acid may not represent transmissible live virus. Conclusion There is a relatively consistent trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 viral load over the course of COVID-19 from respiratory tract samples, however the duration of infectivity remains uncertain.