A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Child and Family Studies
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Journal of Child and Family Studies (2021) 30:1123–1140
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-01932-4
ORIGINAL PAPER
Examining the Effectiveness of Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P):
A Multi-Site Non-Randomized Study with Waitlist Control
Anne-Marie Maxwell 1●Catherine McMahon1●Anna Huber1●Rebecca E. Reay2●Erinn Hawkins3●
Bryanne Barnett4
Received: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 20 February 2021 / Published online: 13 March 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Recognition of the protective value of secure parent–child relationships has prompted a growing interest in parenting
interventions informed by attachment theory. Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) is one such program, specifically
designed for scalability. Although widely disseminated internationally, evidence for the effectiveness of COS-P is very
limited. This non-randomized controlled effectiveness study was designed to help address this gap. A sample of 256 parents
of children aged 0–6 years was recruited from four community child and family health organizations. Assessments were
undertaken pre- and post-intervention for the treatment group (n=201) and at comparable times for the waitlist control
group (n=55). Analysis of data for mothers (89% of sample) revealed a significant Time x Group interaction for six of the
seven outcomes examined. Compared to mothers in the control condition, treatment group mothers reported significantly: (a)
improved parental mentalizing and self-efficacy regarding empathy and affection toward the child; (b) reduced caregiving
helplessness and hostility toward the child; and (c) reduced depression symptoms, at the end of COS-P treatment. There was
no difference between groups for change in perceived child difficultness. Within-treatment-group analyses indicated that
mothers with older children reported greatest reductions in caregiving helplessness, and mothers with probable clinical
depression pre-intervention reported greatest reductions in hostility and depression symptoms. Improvements in other study
outcomes did not differ by depression severity or child age. Exploratory analyses indicated that treatment group fathers
showed the same pattern of change as mothers. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Keywords Circle of Security ●Parenting self-efficacy ●Parental mentalizing ●Parental depression
Highlights
●This is one of few studies of the popular COS-P intervention that includes a control condition.
●Parents receiving COS-P reported greater improvements than control group parents.
●Mothers with likely clinical depression pre-intervention reported greatest reductions in hostility towards the child and
depression symptoms.
●Mothers with pre-schoolers reported greatest reductions in caregiving helplessness.
Research over many decades has demonstrated the lasting
impact of early life experiences on children’s development,
educational achievement and physical health (Bellis et al.,
2019; Moore et al., 2017). The parent–child relationship is
key to the child’s experience of the world during this critical
period (Scheeringa & Zeanah, 2001), and there is strong
evidence that this foundational relationship influences
developmental trajectories (National Scientific Council on
the Developing Child, 2015). Attachment theory (Ains-
worth, 1964; Bowlby, 1969/1982), with its focus on the
parent–child relationship from the earliest days, underpins
*Anne-Marie Maxwell
am.maxwell15@gmail.com
1Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology,
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
2Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, ANU
Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, ACT
2601, Australia
3Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Applied
Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
4School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales,
Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
1234567890();,:
1234567890();,:
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.