Content uploaded by Nadežda Silaški
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nadežda Silaški on Mar 13, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
УНИВЕРЗИТЕТ У НОВОМ САДУ
ФИЛОЗОФСКИ ФАКУЛТЕТ
ЈЕЗИЦИ И КУЛТУРЕ
У ВРЕМЕНУ И ПРОСТОРУ
IX/1
Тематски зборник
Нови Сад, 2020
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE
METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE1
1. INTRODUCTION
Nadežda Silaški – Tatjana Đurović
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE
3. METHODOLOGY
razvod
Nadežda Silaški – Tatjana Đurović
4. ANALYSIS
4.1. Marriage between nation states
[
]
4.2. Marriage between political parties
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE
4.3. Marriage between companies
riage
Nadežda Silaški – Tatjana Đurović
5. DISCUSSION
however, as our examples also show, marriage as the source domain used with the aim of making
complex social and political events more comprehensible is filled with various additional aspects which
not only significantly broaden the conceptualisation of the selected target domain – RELATIONSHIP
(between states/political parties/companies), but also serve to influence our thought and perception of
the target domain.
Therefore, we regard the MARRIAGE metaphor as being made up of the three overlapping fields,
those consisting of: 1. core aspects; 2. peripheral aspects; and 3. culture-specific aspects (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Interrelated aspects of the MARRIAGE metaphor
These three types of aspects are reminiscent of some other theoretical and methodological concepts
used in critical approaches to metaphor analysis, such as ‘scenarios’ and ‘story lines’ (Musolff 2006,
2016) or ‘frames’ and ‘scripts’ (Charteris-Black 2004, 2019). Thus, metaphor scenarios “enable the
speakers to not only apply source to target concepts but to draw on them to build narrative frames for
the conceptualization and assessment of sociopolitical issues and to ‘spin out’ these narratives into
emergent discourse traditions that are characteristic of their respective community” (Musolff 2006: 36),
whereas the process of framing refers to “drawing attention to, or raising awareness of, selective aspects
of a particular entity or situation thereby introducing some form of cognitive bias” (Charteris Black
2019: 16). Combined with a script as “a predetermined stereotypical sequence of actions” in a particular
context, the marriage and divorce frame, according to Charteris-Black, exhibits familiar sequence of
events of the marriage relationship – “meeting, getting engaged, encountering difficulties and separating
or divorcing” (Charteris-Black 2019: 22).
In terms of the importance that they have for the structuring of the marriage metaphor, we define
core aspects as those aspects of the MARRIAGE metaphor that are indispensable to the structuring of an
issue. Our experiential knowledge as well as our “folk-theoretical domain knowledge” (Musolff 2016:
32) about the concept of marriage allow us to set out the following core mappings that constitute the
MARRIAGE metaphor:
CORE ASPECTS
CULTURE-SPECIFIC
ASPECTS
PERIPHERAL
ASPECTS
Figure 1.
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE
core aspects
Peripheral aspects
Nadežda Silaški – Tatjana Đurović
culture-specic aspects
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE
6. CONCLUSION
and
and
Nadežda Silaški – Tatjana Đurović
22
–
EXPLORING THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE MARRIAGE METAPHOR IN MEDIA DISCOURSE