contagion captures the co-incidence of extreme return shocks across countries within a region the extent of contagion, its economic significance, and its determinants using a multinomial 1990s, we find that contagion, when measured by the co-incidence within and across regions of changes, and conditional stock return volatility. Evidence that contagion is stronger for extreme September 2001 Associate Professor, College of Business Administration, Korea University ** Professor of Finance and Dean's Distinguished Research Professor, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University *** Professor of Finance and Reese Chair of Banking and Monetary Economics, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research. The authors are grateful to the Dice Center for Research on Financial Economics for support. We thank Tom Santner, Mark Berliner, Bob Leone, and Stan Lemeshow for useful discussions on methodology, Steve Cecchetti, Peter Christoffersen, Craig Doidge, Barry Eichengreen, Vihang Errunza, David Hirshleifer, Roberto Rigobon, Richard Roll, Karen Wruck and, especially, an anonymous referee and the editor, Cam Harvey, for comments. Comments from seminar participants at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Korea University, McGill University, Yale University, Michigan State University, Universiteit Maasstricht, Ohio State University, Rice University, Monte Verita Risk Management Conference (Ascona, Switzerland), Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Global Investment Conference on International Investing (Whistler), and the NYSE Conference on Global Equity Markets in Transition (Hawaii) improved the paper.