ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Background In several countries public health efforts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic have included movement restrictions that confine residents to their home or to reduced catchment areas. Household characteristics and assets of nearby spaces may be particularly relevant to support wellbeing and mental health in this context. The aim of this study was to explore wellbeing and mental health associations with factors of the immediate natural and built environment among adults in Ireland during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We did cross-sectional analyses using Irish data from the GreenCOVID study. Participants were recruited online between June and July, 2020, with a convenience sampling approach. All respondents who provided informed consent and data on variables of interest were included in analysis. Wellbeing was assessed with the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index, and mental health with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Means and SD were used to describe the perceived importance of views to green and blue spaces and physical access to outdoor spaces (range 0–10). We used χ² tests and multiple linear regression models to explore associations of wellbeing and mental health with household type, household problems, number of bedrooms, number of co-habitants, spaces enabling physical access to the outdoors, quality of views and views to green spaces from home. Regression models were controlled by age, gender, city versus non-city household location, marital status, and self-perceived health. Findings We included data from 243 participants; mean age was 43 years (SD 16) and most participants were women (n=174 [72%]). Participants perceived that the outdoors helped them cope with restriction measures to a high extent (mean score 8·54 [SD 1·79]; 43% of respondents reported the maximum score), and highly valued views to blue (7·82 [2·45]) and green spaces (8·84 [1·76]). Household problems were significantly associated with lower wellbeing scores (beta=–9·78 [95% CI −15·675 to −3·885]) and increased likelihood of mental disorders (0·583 [0·284 to 0·889]). Interpretation Our findings show high perceived benefits of views to green and blue spaces and access to the outdoors from home during the first wave of COVID-19. Moreover, those living in a household with problems had higher likelihood of poor mental health outcomes. This study highlights the importance of natural and built environment in helping people cope with the negative effects of the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Funding Health Research Board (HRB), grant no. SPHeRE-2019-1.
Abstracts
20
www.thelancet.com/lancetgh
Associations of the natural and built environment with
mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19:
Irish perspectives from the GreenCOVID study
Viveka Guzman, Marco Garrido-Cumbrera, Olta Braçe, Denise Hewlett, Ronan Foley
Abstract
Background In several countries public health eorts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic have included movement
restrictions that confine residents to their home or to reduced catchment areas. Household characteristics and assets
of nearby spaces may be particularly relevant to support wellbeing and mental health in this context. The aim of this
study was to explore wellbeing and mental health associations with factors of the immediate natural and built
environment among adults in Ireland during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods We did cross-sectional analyses using Irish data from the GreenCOVID study. Participants were recruited
online between June and July, 2020, with a convenience sampling approach. All respondents who provided informed
consent and data on variables of interest were included in analysis. Wellbeing was assessed with the WHO-5 Wellbeing
Index, and mental health with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Means and SD were used to describe the
perceived importance of views to green and blue spaces and physical access to outdoor spaces (range 0–10). We used
χ2 tests and multiple linear regression models to explore associations of wellbeing and mental health with household
type, household problems, number of bedrooms, number of co-habitants, spaces enabling physical access to the
outdoors, quality of views and views to green spaces from home. Regression models were controlled by age, gender,
city versus non-city household location, marital status, and self-perceived health.
Findings We included data from 243 participants; mean age was 43 years (SD 16) and most participants were women
(n=174 [72%]). Participants perceived that the outdoors helped them cope with restriction measures to a high extent
(mean score 8·54 [SD 1·79]; 43% of respondents reported the maximum score), and highly valued views to blue (7·82
[2·45]) and green spaces (8·84 [1·76]). Household problems were significantly associated with lower wellbeing scores
(beta=–9·78 [95% CI –15·675 to –3·885]) and increased likelihood of mental disorders (0·583 [0·284 to 0·889]).
Interpretation Our findings show high perceived benefits of views to green and blue spaces and access to the outdoors
from home during the first wave of COVID-19. Moreover, those living in a household with problems had higher
likelihood of poor mental health outcomes. This study highlights the importance of natural and built environment in
helping people cope with the negative eects of the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Funding Health Research Board (HRB), grant no. SPHeRE-2019-1.
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Declaration of interests
We declare no competing interests.
Published Online
March 11, 2021
Royal College of Surgeons in
Ireland, Division of Population
Health, Dublin, Ireland
(V Guzman MD); Health and
Territory Research (HTR),
University of Seville,
Department of Physical
Geography and Regional
Geographic
Analysis, Seville, Spain
(M Garrido-Cumbrera PhD,
O Braçe PhD); University of
Winchester, Faculty of
Business, Law and Digital
Technologies, Winchester,
UK(D Hewlett PhD); Maynooth
University, Department of
Geography, Maynooth, Ireland
(R Foley PhD)
Correspondence to:
Dr Viveka Guzman, Division of
Population Health, Royal College
of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaux
Lane House, Mercer Street Lower,
D02DH60, Dublin, Ireland
vivekaguzman@rcsi.ie
... The built environment is the physical environment constructed for human life and activities, which has an impact on people's physical health [5][6][7] as well as their psychological health (e.g., anxiety and depression) [8][9][10][11]. In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on the relationship between the built environment and mental health [12][13][14][15], including residential floor levels [16], green spaces [17,18], and exposure to indoor air pollutants [19]. The built environment can impact people's mental health by influencing their connection to nature, personal control, and indoor air quality [20]. ...
... According to existing research, aside from the stress induced by academic pressure, the epidemic's development exacerbated students' anxiety [3], and the campus's built-up environment also impacted students' mental health and anxiety [28,29]. The majority of research on the relationship between the built environment and mental health has been completed on large-scale built environments [12,21] or small-scale residential buildings [9,16]; fewer studies have been conducted at the architectural scale of academic buildings, particularly in the context of epidemics. Furthermore, current research focuses on the independent effects of specific factors on mental health, such as green space [17,24], air pollution [19], and traffic noise [30]. ...
... After controlling for the confounding effects of other built environment factors, general satisfaction with the built environment can negatively and significantly influence students' anxiety tendencies, confirming previous research on the crucial role of the built environment on mental health (e.g., anxiety and depression) [8][9][10][11]. It also shows that, in addition to the built environment factors summarized in this study, the built environment, as a physical environment created for human life and activity, contains other factors that may influence students' tendency to anxiety. For example, preferred interior colors, indoor plants, and artwork with windows can reduce the risk of anxiety and depression [28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Anxiety on college campuses has increased due to the COVID-19 epidemic’s profound effects on society. Much research has been conducted on how the built environment influences mental health; however, little has been undertaken on how it affects student mental health in the context of the epidemic from the architectural scale perspective of academic buildings. Based on online survey data, this study develops multiple linear regression and binary logistic regression models to investigate students’ satisfaction ratings of the academic buildings’ physical environments during the epidemic and how these satisfaction ratings affect students’ anxiety tendencies. According to the study’s findings regarding the natural exposure perspective, students who perceived the academic building’s poor semi-open space view (p = 0.004, OR = 3.22) as unsatisfactory factors were more likely to show anxiety tendencies. In terms of the physical conditions, students who were dissatisfied with the noise level in the classroom (p = 0.038, OR = 0.616) and the summer heat in semi-open spaces (p = 0.031, OR = 2.38) were more likely to exhibit anxiety tendencies. Additionally, even after controlling for confusing distractions, the general satisfaction rating of the academic building’s physical environments (p = 0.047, OR = 0.572) was still able to significantly and negatively affect students’ anxiety tendencies. The study’s findings can be used in the architectural and environmental planning of academic buildings focusing on mental health.
... Epidemiological studies have linked both neighbourhood green space (Cohen-Cline et al., 2015;Zhang et al., 2021;Reyes-Riveros et al., 2021;Feng et al., 2022) and coastal proximity (Hermanski et al., 2022;McDougall et al., 2021;White et al., 2021) to a lower incidence of mental health issues, as well as better subjective wellbeing. Similarly, natural features immediately visible from home (Guzman et al., 2021;Honold et al., 2016), as well as recreational visits to green and blue spaces (White et al., 2021), have been positively associated with a variety of wellbeing outcomes. Given evidence from prospective studies identifying affective disorders as a risk factor for sleep disturbances in later life (Smagula et al., 2016; although see Kalmbach et al., 2014 for a discussion of potential bi-directionality), better mental wellbeing has the potential to mediate the associations between each type of nature exposure and insufficient sleep. ...
... Supporting predictions that mental wellbeing may be one mechanism that underlies the relationships between nature exposure and insufficient sleep, path analyses indicated that both having more streetscape greenery and blue views from home were associated with lower rates of insufficient sleep via better mental wellbeing. Consistent with prior work demonstrating the affective benefits of natural features directly around the home (Guzman et al., 2021;Honold et al., 2016), the association between blue view from home and insufficient sleep was fully mediated by mental wellbeing. Partial mediation of the relationship between streetscape greenery and insufficient sleep via mental wellbeing suggests additional mechanisms may underpin this association. ...
... The built environment serves as a key focal point that can be retrofitted to improve pedestrian/bicyclist safety outcomes (Stoker et al. 2015, Thompson et al. 2020, Ahmad et al. 2021. Walkable neighborhoods have sustainability and public health related benefitsnamely, support for active travel (Frank et al. 2005, Cao et al. 2006, Saelens and Handy 2008, Handy et al. 2014, better mental health (Wang et al. 2019, Guzman et al. 2021, Asiamah et al. 2022, and lower morbidity and mortality from chronic , Jackson 2003, Rundle et al. 2009, Sallis et al. 2012, Wali et al. 2022) and infectious diseases (Adlakha and Sallis 2021, Wali and Frank 2021, Alidadi and Sharifi 2022, Wali 2023. In addition, more walkable neighborhoods offer significant motorized user safety benefits noting the previous exception when it comes to exposure to local levels of air pollution which was also found to be positively correlated with walkability (Marshall et al. 2009). ...
Article
Walkable neighborhoods provide significant sustainability, health, and motorized user safety benefits. Far less consideration is given to the potential pedestrian/bicyclist safety-related implications of macro-level walkability. Making it desirable to walk and bike without providing the proper physical environment to make it safe is clearly problematic. This study assessed the links between neighborhood walkability and pedestrian/bicyclist traffic fatalities across metropolitan areas in the U.S. We integrated and harnessed geocoded data on pedestrian/bicyclist and all mode traffic fatalities, travel behavior exposures (use of sedentary and active travel modes), sociodemographic, and control variables. Associations of pedestrian/bicyclist traffic fatality rates with walkability characteristics were estimated using multilevel Tobit models with treatment for hierarchical unobserved regional and state variations. Walkability index (mixed land use, street intersection density, and transit accessibility) was positively correlated with pedestrian/bicyclist fatality rates after adjusting for travel exposures, sociodemographic controls, and regional and state-level unobserved variations. A unit increase in the walkability index was associated with a 4.9% increase (95% CI: 4.2%, 5.7%) in pedestrian/bicyclist fatality rates. Conversely, the walkability index was negatively correlated with total or all-mode fatality rates. The positive association between walkability and pedestrian/bicyclist fatality rates appeared robust in different sensitivity analyses. Despite non-linearities, neighborhoods with greater population using active travel modes for commute had on-average higher pedestrian/bicyclist fatality rates. The reverse was true for neighborhoods with greater teleworking population. Neighborhoods with greater prevalence of black, low-income, and younger adults had on-average higher pedestrian/bicyclist fatality rates. Results emphasize the need to develop new conceptual definitions of walkability that consider safety within the built environments. Our results highlight the importance of understanding how pedestrian/bicyclist supportive design can be used to maximize the positive health benefits of walkability while reducing the risk of pedestrian/bicyclist deaths. Findings also suggest the need to enhance existing walkability assessment techniques (indices) to predict and simulate how different investments impact pedestrian/bicyclist safety. Incorporation of objective pedestrian/bicyclist safety in walkability assessments can assist practitioners to simultaneously improve health while minimizing safety risks to vulnerable road users.
... For example, people who live near green spaces are more likely to have better mental health (Nutsford et al., 2013;Beyer et al., 2014). Guzman et al. (2021) demonstrated positive associations between green neighborhoods and better mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conversely, studies have found that living in gentrified or segregated areas can cause more stress and can negatively impact mental health (Gibbons & Barton, 2016;Lim et al., 2017;Tran et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Research shows that certain external factors can affect the mental health of many people in a community. Moreover, the importance of mental health has significantly increased in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many people communicate and express their emotions through social media platforms, which provide researchers with opportunities to examine insights into their opinions and mental state. While social sensing studies using social media data have flourished in the last decade, many studies using social media data to detect and predict mental health status have focused on the individual level. In this study, we aim to generate a social sensing index for mental health to monitor emotional well-being, which is closely related to mental health, and to identify daily trends in negative emotions at the city level. We conduct sentiment analysis on Twitter data and compute entropy of the degree of sentiment change to develop the index. We observe sentiment trends fluctuate significantly in response to unusual events. It is found that the social sensing index for mental health reflects both city-wide and local events that trigger negative emotions, as well as areas where negative emotions persist. The study contributes to the growing body of research that uses social media data to examine mental health at a city-level. We focus on mental health at the city-level rather than individual, which provides a broader perspective on the mental health of a population. Social sensing index for mental health allows public health professionals to monitor and identify persistent negative sentiments and potential areas where mental health issues may emerge.
... These results confirm how (over)tourism development as a unique context, along with gender, age, and distance from the destination (location of living), affects children's sense of connectedness with nature, place attachment, and, ultimately, inclinations toward pro-environmental behaviour. Notably, the COVID-19 outbreak played a significant role in how essential nature became for individuals (Guzman et al., 2021) and how important it was for local authorities to reconnect children with their environment (Séraphin, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
As tourism research has paid limited attention to children, this study investigates children's reactions to tourism development, focusing on their unique viewpoints on the World Heritage Site of Dubrovnik, Croatia. It employed cognitive neuroscience methods with 397 participants, revealing that, despite their preference for sustainable tourism scenarios, children exhibit a notable fixation on images emblematic of overtourism and associated challenges, particularly overcrowding. When exposed to sustainable tourism photographs, there was an observable increase in physiological arousal, albeit not as pronounced as when confronted with an overtourism scenario. Intriguingly, regardless of the scenario, children predominantly expressed neutral emotions. Within the sustainable tourism context, gender differences manifest as girls exhibiting lower levels of place attachment. Furthermore, inner-city residents exhibit diminished levels of nature connectedness, and emotions are indirectly linked to nature connectedness, place attachment, or pro-environmental behaviour. Conversely, in the unsustainable scenario, older children and inner-city residents exhibited a heightened sense of neutrality towards overtourism-related concerns, whereas those outside the inner city displayed a stronger affinity for nature connectedness. Positive emotions were negatively associated with nature connectedness and pro-environmental behaviour but positively associated with place attachment. Accordingly, this study advocates a more inclusive and sustainable future through children's empowerment in tourism development.
... Table 1 illustrates how the SMPs extend the focus of other competency frameworks by deeply examining the concept of "being", especially within the principle of "spiritual intelligence". For example, the principle of "Oneness with Nature" is only included within the Greencomp framework, yet is arguably critical to well-being (Guzman et al., 2021) and inspiring connection and experience of the natural world that underpins a desire to protect it (Louv, 2005). The comparative lack of comparability to UNESCO (2017)/QAA and Advance HE (2021) in "spiritual intelligence" is especially marked, since SMPs such as "mindfulness" are arguably key according to the neuroscience of the potential gains from opening new neural pathways in the development of sustainability solutions (Wamsler and Brink, 2018). ...
Article
Purpose Organisational responses to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals depend on the competency and mindset of business leaders to lead responsibly. This study is informed and underpinned by the Principles of Responsible Management Education. This study aims to examine how embedding the “sustainability mindset principles” within a university programme can contribute to responsible management education and, by extension, leadership development. Design/methodology/approach An illustrative case study using 84 students was applied, including undergraduate, postgraduate and executive Master of Business Administration students. An exploratory, qualitative design was followed, primarily adopting focus groups. Findings Evidenced learning gains in connecting sustainability knowledge with personal beliefs and behaviours, provide a compelling basis for educational and business practitioners to focus on the sustainability mindset principles (SMPs). Mapping of mindset against leading global competency frameworks provides important theoretical insight. Learning is illustrated through multiple dimensions (i.e. cognitive, behavioural and affective) to inform leadership development approaches. Research limitations/implications The mapping of sustainability competency frameworks against the SMP, alongside qualitative research insights, provides a compelling basis for further research into the learning gains from embedding the mindset principles. The situated nature of the study and the lack of longitudinal measurement of what students take forward into their lives and workplaces is a limiting factor to be considered. Practical implications This study evidences the value of “whole-person” learning for responsible management, which can helpfully inform the design of both educational and workplace leadership development programmes. Originality/value This study is original in the pedagogic examination of the learning dimensions of the SMPs in a Business and Management programme. It also offers new insights in terms of the implications for leadership development.
... ample research has focused on this 'urban vs nature dichotomy' (Karmanov and Hamel, 2008), it is increasingly recognised that aesthetic, design, social and other qualities of both green/natural and urban/built environments can also modulate the subjective experience, emotional reactions and environmental preferences of people. Due to increasing urbanisation worldwide, researchers are interested to understand what aspects of the built environment itself can improve mental and physical wellbeing (Saarloos et al., 2011;Guzman et al., 2021;Buttazzoni et al., 2021). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This paper reports on an online study to investigate the interaction between the environment typology, and crowdedness with aesthetic perceptions of the environment.
Article
Full-text available
The reduction of social interactions through non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) has been shown to effectively curb COVID-19 transmission. However, these control measures were often accompanied by changes in people’s daily routines and constraints on their activity space, which could lead to mental distress (i.e., anxiety and depression). This study examined the interplay among individuals’ anxiety, depression, daily activities, and perceptions of COVID-19 and neighborhood cohesion. Taking Hong Kong as an example, an online survey (N = 376) was conducted to collect data from participants between March 14 to May 11, 2022. The data include respondents’ self-reported anxiety and depressive symptoms, daily activities (e.g., smartphone use), perceptions of COVID-19 (e.g., the possibility of infecting COVID-19), and perceptions of neighborhood cohesion. Using network analysis, we found that excessive smartphone use, life disturbance by COVID-19, and a community with people getting along well with each other were significant factors associated with participants’ anxiety and depression. Using critical path analysis, we observed that NPIs reduced human mobility, led to delayed bedtime, and increased smartphone use, which were associated with participants’ mental distress. We also found that NPIs and COVID-19 were associated with people’s perceptions of infection and the severity of COVID-19 and human mobility flexibility, which may further lead to mental distress. Our results also demonstrated that people with high education levels were vulnerable. These results provided important insights for designing appropriate interventions without generating deleterious impacts on people’s mental health in the future.
Chapter
Full-text available
There is now considerable evidence that access to good quality green and/or blue spaces is good for peoples’ health and wellbeing. Concomitantly, there has been increasing emphasis, in national policies, on finding ways to use the natural environment as a key resource to support people’s health: all of which has been accelerated since the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, key research gaps remain. This chapter reviews what we do and don’t know about the impact of nature on people’s health. We argue that the integration of research with planning tools is key to achieving environmental planning and development that is beneficial to health. We consider the challenges of conducting evidence-based research that involves people and natural environments and provide directions for future research that can support policies that have the potential to make full use of green and blue spaces to enhance people’s health and wellbeing.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To examine the association between housing types and COVID-19 infection (or mental health) during the early stages of the pandemic by using the large-scale individual-level All of Us Research Program COVID-19 Participant Experience (COPE) survey data. We hypothesise that housing types with a shared component are associated with elevated COVID-19 infection and subsequent mental health conditions. Design A retrospective case–control study. Setting Secondary analysis of online surveys conducted in the USA. Participants 62 664 participant responses to COPE from May to July 2020. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure is the self-reported COVID-19 status, and the secondary outcome measures are anxiety or stress. Both measures were applied for matched cases and controls of the same race, sex, age group and survey version. Results A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that housing types with a shared component are significantly associated with COVID-19 infection (OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3; p=2×10 ⁻⁴ ), anxiety (OR=1.26, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4; p=1.1×10 ⁻⁶ ) and stress (OR=1.29, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4; p=4.3×10 ⁻¹⁰ ) as compared with free-standing houses, after adjusting for confounding factors. Further, frequent optional shopping or outing trips, another indicator of the built environment, are also associated with COVID-19 infection (OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.8; p=0.02), but not associated with elevated mental health conditions. Confounding factors are controlled in the analysis such as ethnicity, age, social distancing behaviour and house occupancy. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that houses with a shared component tend to have an increased risk of COVID-19 transmission, which consequently leads to high levels of anxiety and stress for their dwellers. The study also suggests the necessity to improve the quality of the built environment such as residential housing and its surroundings through planning, design and management, ensuring a more resilient society that can cope with future pandemics.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.