Content uploaded by André Achim
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by André Achim on Apr 21, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Abstract
!"
#
$%
&' !"!!"
(
1. Introduction
)!!" !"*
+,,- .
)/0+,1-
//+,,2
3 .
3
3
%
40566-
756+1
#
(8
9
:;
<:; #:0+
#
0:0+
%:0+4
#
#%:0+
(
;
=8:0+
%
2. Methods
:;
!"+5
(>?@A>?@$
+?6;
;B0 ///+,,2
4<56++
###9
;
#
%#C69$(
(+66+?6D
$+?E3
F
G3 G3(8=$
3( G3(
48*
##(
$#+?6
%#(($(
%HI
8:0+
:8
:;
;+,,?:0+%
%)(
:0+#$3
:0+J
:0+G:0+.0
)K6L+?6M(
%
.0#
4K(+666M(
%:;
(()GN$
5+584n+5
$
<$
L
3. Results and Discussion
%+)GNL#
$LO
O
%:;
%
4. Conflict of Interest Statement
OJ
5. Acknowledgment
%.<0 !"
N0")LG)!N0L;#
"OG)!N0
0;.
6. References
Achim, A. (1995). Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo
comparison of the sensitivity of different methods. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 96: 574-584.
Cheyne, D., Bakhtazad, L., Gaetz, W. (2006). Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity
accompanying voluntary movements using an eventPrelated beamforming
approach. Human brain mapping, 27: 213-229.
Jobst, C., Ferrari, P., Isabella, S., Cheyne, D. (2018). BrainWave: A Matlab Toolbox for
Beamformer Source Analysis of MEG Data. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12: 587.
Makeig S, Bell AJ, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ. (1996) Independent component analysis of
electroencephalographic data. In Touretzky D., Mozer M., Hasselmo M. (Eds.),
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 8: 145-51.
Scherg, M., Von Cramon, D. (1986) Evoked dipole source potentials of the human
auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65: 344-360.
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source
software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological
data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011: article ID 156869.
doi:10.1155/2011/156869
Van Veen, B. D., Van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M., Suzuki, A. (1997). Localization of
brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial
filtering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44: 867-880.
Figure 1: Aligned waveforms displayed for the group of 12 subjects for the condition
Heschl Left – Auditory Right. Thicker curve is group average.
Table 1: Averaged p values (in bold when <.05) obtained from PC1 signal detection for
group sizes 2 to 12 under the PAM and Rectifying methods. Legend: HL (Heschl Left);
HR (Heschl Right) AL (Auditory Left stimulation); AR (Auditory Right stimulation).
HL - AL HR - AL HR - AR HL - AR
:; N!0% :; N!0% :; N!0% :; N!0%
Q
565?> 65>C 65CC 6+1- 65,? 65>5 6+-6 656,
Q
C6+15 6+-2 6+C> 6++5 65CC 6+?1 66-> 6+5+
Q
>6+C5 6+5+ 6616 66-- 6+1> 6611 0.025 6625
Q
?66,6 661, 0.04
8
0.04
16+>> 0.04
90.010 0.04
4
Q
-66?, 66-- 0.03
0
0.02
66+++ 0.02
70.005 0.02
8
Q
2
0.03
8
0.05
0
0.01
8
0.01
6661? 0.01
50.002 0.01
8
Q
1
0.02
4
0.03
6
0.01
1
0.01
066-> 0.00
90.001 0.01
2
Q
,
0.01
5
0.02
6
0.00
7
0.00
6
0.04
7
0.00
5
0.000
5
0.00
8
Q
+6
0.00
9
0.01
8
0.00
5
0.00
4
0.03
4
0.00
3
0.000
2
0.00
5
Q
++
0.00
6
0.01
2
0.00
3
0.00
2
0.02
4
0.00
2
0.000
1
0.00
4
Q
+5
0.00
4
0.00
8
0.00
2
0.00
1
0.01
7
0.00
1
0.000
06
0.00
3
)
<Q:; 3
E<Q:; 3D
E43C
E<3
E3
E%3**;
J
E
))Q3R5D
#))())S66+T))
U%*UD
<Q3D
K0VMQ3UT3+D
Q3T0W6D
V
<'Q(<'D
KMQ:0+.
EKMQ:0+.D
E.
# ;%B;O
E.
#
E
E3.
EN()
E%
E!N:
E3
E6
E3D
*
E)
6
E3#
8
E:0;KM#
E
#:
E'
.Q:T.T).#
E)%
:..T)
E)
E
E#
E
E'
E;;)' 0
E!0G+,,?,-'
?2>(?1>
Q.D
Q$.D
S5.Q..XDE
#
Q(+D
K/VMQ.UT.+D
Q/D
Q/(+'D
5QUTXTD
5WQU%:0+
#UD
Q*TX5D
Q5T(D