ArticlePublisher preview available

Visible Tattoos as a Source of Employment Discrimination Among Female Applicants for a Supervisory Position

Springer Nature
Journal of Business and Psychology
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Although tattoos have increased in popularity, they may put individuals at a disadvantage when seeking employment. Drawing on the justification-suppression model and the stereotype content model, we propose that job applicants with visible tattoos experience prejudice in hiring and starting salary recommendations because they are stereotyped as less competent and warm than those without visible tattoos. In Study 1, we compared equally qualified Caucasian female applicants in their mid to late 20s with no visible tattoos, a mild visible tattoo, and extreme visible tattoos for the position of a sales manager. Tattooed applicants were less likely to be hired, especially if they had extreme visible tattoos, and were offered lower salaries and rated lower on competence (but not warmth) than applicants without visible tattoos. Furthermore, competence mediated the relationship between visible tattoos and hiring and salary recommendations. In Study 2, we examined if young Caucasian female applicants with visible tattoos can overcome prejudice through their job qualifications and found they were able to mitigate salary discrimination, but not hiring discrimination by being highly qualified. In Study 3, we proposed that young Caucasian female applicants with visible tattoos can neutralize discrimination by being highly qualified and having volunteer experience. However, volunteering did not mitigate prejudice related to visible tattoos. Our findings suggest that it is difficult for applicants with visible tattoos to overcome discrimination.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Visible Tattoos as a Source of Employment Discrimination
Among Female Applicants for a Supervisory Position
Christine A. Henle
1
&Ted H. Shore
2
&Kevin R. Murphy
3
&Alyssa D. Marshall
4
Accepted: 5 January 2021
#This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021
Abstract
Although tattoos have increased in popularity, they may put individuals at a disadvantage when seeking employment. Drawing
on the justification-suppression model and the stereotype content model, we propose that job applicants with visible tattoos
experience prejudice in hiring and starting salary recommendations because they are stereotyped as less competent and warm
than those without visible tattoos. In Study 1, we compared equally qualified Caucasian female applicants in their mid to late 20s
with no visible tattoos, a mild visible tattoo, and extreme visible tattoos for the position of a sales manager. Tattooed applicants
were less likely to be hired, especially if they had extreme visible tattoos, and were offered lower salaries and rated lower on
competence (but not warmth) than applicants without visible tattoos. Furthermore, competence mediated the relationship be-
tween visible tattoos and hiring and salary recommendations. In Study 2, we examined if young Caucasian female applicants with
visible tattoos can overcome prejudice through their job qualifications and found they were able to mitigate salary discrimination,
but not hiring discrimination by being highly qualified. In Study 3, we proposed that young Caucasian female applicants with
visible tattoos can neutralize discrimination by being highly qualified and having volunteer experience. However, volunteering
did not mitigate prejudice related to visible tattoos. Our findings suggest that it is difficult for applicants with visible tattoos to
overcome discrimination.
Keywords Body art .Discrimination .Hiring .Stereotypes .Tattoos
Organizational policies and practices based on physical ap-
pearance, such as requiring makeup or a certain level of at-
tractiveness and limiting facial or body hair, have been legally
challenged over the years (HRFocus, 2008). Although only a
handful of US locations outlaw employment discrimination
based on appearance (e.g., Michigan, District of Columbia,
San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Madison), practices such as
Abercrombie & FitchsLook Policyhave been legally chal-
lenged (King, 2016) and recently laws have been passed
prohibiting discrimination based on hairstyles and facial hair
(e.g., Phillis & Brailey, 2020). Given the increased attention
by the EEOC, legislators, and the courts (Pating & Cruse,
2019), employers need to reevaluate their appearance-based
practices and policies. Even if they are not legally challenged,
employers may be missing out on a viable portion of the labor
force if they screen applicants or treat employees adversely
because of aspects of their appearance that may not be indic-
ative of job performance (Graham, Harvey, & Puri, 2016;
Jackson, Hunter, & Hodge, 1995).
A large body of literature has shown that we judge others
based on physical appearance. For example, attractive people
are seen as more competent (e.g., Todorov, Mandisodza,
Goren, & Hall, 2005), intelligent (Zebrowitz, Hall, Murphy,
& Rhodes, 2002), trustworthy (e.g., Eagly, Ashmore,
Makhijani, & Longo, 1991), employable (e.g., Marlowe,
Schneider, & Nelson, 1996), and earn more (e.g., Mobius &
Rosenblat, 2006). We argue that visible tattoos represent an-
other aspect of physical appearance that could affect employ-
ment outcomes, and that it deserves attention, especially
because of the increasing proportion of the population that
*Christine A. Henle
chris.henle@colostate.edu
1
Department of Management, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Department of Management, California State University San Marcos,
San Marcos, USA
3
Department of Work and Employment Studies, University of
Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
4
Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, USA
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09731-w
/ Published online: 7 March 2021
Journal of Business and Psychology (2022) 37:107–125
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... For example, a subtle form of discrimination targeting women could be represented by offering help in computer matters or in technical aspects of their jobs because women might be portrayed as less technically skilled and in need of support (Dardenne et al., 2007;Feig et al., 2022;Martinez et al., 2017). Likewise, older employees categorized as senile, rigid in thought and old-fashioned, specifically in information technology skills (Ayalon and Tesch-R€ omer, 2017), might be excluded from workgroups or relegated to certain kinds of tasks because they are not considered to be qualified enough (Henle et al., 2022). ...
... Overall, the present study offers the following contributions to the understanding of prevention of discrimination in the remote work context. Firstly, the study builds upon recent developments in the occupational health management literature by examining the discriminations among employee in a way that advances our understanding of the managerial practices in the remote work contextual setting (Henle et al., 2022;K€ ollen, 2021;Konrad et al., 2016). By examining discriminations within the specific context of remote work, we are able to reach an understanding of the work experience in such specific context, as well as the potential role of management practices. ...
... Likewise, employees categorized as senile, rigid in thought and oldfashioned in skills, specifically in information technology skills (i.e. older employees), might be excluded from groups of work or relegated to certain kind of tasks because they are not considered to live up to a request, and this in turn may prevent them from making professional progress (Henle et al., 2022;Kanfer et al., 2020;Schawbel, 2021). ...
Article
Purpose We examined the effect of management practices on overt and subtle forms of discrimination in remote working contexts. Management practices (i.e. diversity and equality management systems) may influence employees’ perception of the diversity climate and affect the occurrence of discrimination. Design/methodology/approach To empirically investigate these associations, we administrated an online questionnaire with self-report measures via a 3-wave longitudinal research design. Findings Data analysis of our sample of N = 153 remotely working employees show that when managers invest in equality and diversity practices, employees perceive their workplace as more inclusive (i.e. diversity climate). In turn, this reduces the occurrence of subtle discriminations. Conversely, this relationship was not significant for overt forms of discrimination. Originality/value This result indicates that creating a diversity climate is especially important when combatting subtle forms of discrimination in remote work contexts. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings in light of managerial studies on discrimination at work and psychological literature on virtual environment and social networking.
... 97) and thus are easily and quickly observable, like race, gender, and age. Recent work in the organizational sciences that draws on the SCM also often examined surface-level traits, such as visible tattoos (Henle et al., 2022), weight (Henderson et al., 2022), and pregnancy (Pownall et al., 2023). Thus, the present work notably extends the SCM by examining a deep-level trait, which includes differences in beliefs, values, attitudes, and personality that are observed via verbal and nonverbal behavior (Harrison et al., 1998). ...
... Notably, a three-factor solution that contained perceived warmth, competence, and assertiveness (i.e., "confident" and "competitive") was not a better representation of the data than a model that simply removed the two items, and so consideration of an additional assertiveness stereotype was not supported. Given that others assessed competence using a measure that removed assertiveness-related items and added more adjectives to purely reflect competence (Henle et al., 2022), future research would benefit from delving further into measurement validation for the warmth and competence measures. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper drew on the stereotype content model (SCM) to clarify cultural stereotypes about introverted and extraverted people at work to increase our understanding of the stereotype-driven process that may lead to negative responses to introversion and subsequent detriment to employee health and well-being. The hypothesis that introverted workers would be rated as lower in warmth and competence than extraverted workers was examined across three studies. Study 1 used qualitative content analyses to assess open responses that freely described introverted and extraverted colleagues. Study 2 tested the hypothesis quantitatively using established measures of warmth and competence. Finally, Study 3 tested if one’s self-identified personality impacted perceptions of warmth and competence. Across all studies, introverted employees were endorsed as being lower in warmth and competence than extraverted employees. In Study 3, warmth and competence stereotypes held regardless of one’s identification as introverted or extraverted. Finally, social interaction requirements of the job moderated perceptions of competence in Study 1, but not in Study 2 or 3. The present findings extend the SCM to new groups and provide empirical evidence to support a key driver in negative responses to introversion in the workplace. The results also suggest that job demands and personality identity salience are important considerations, and a need for organizations to engage in best practices to reduce the negative impact of these stereotypes on employees’ health and well-being.
... A fact that cannot be denied is that there is still a lot of discrimination against females who have tattoos or facial piercings, especially the visible tattoos. Henle et al. gave the result that females with visible tattoos suffering bias when they looked for job opportunities [21]. The research did by McElroy et al. showed that people with facial piercings were affected with the negative effects when they applied for jobs [22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nowadays, more and more females choose to have tattoos or facial piercings and it is a trend in recent years. At the same time, those females may face discrimination or experience bias. Understanding the reasons that females have tattoos or facial piercings and revealing the dilemmas they are facing have been the focus of a large number of research papers. This paper aims at establishing the link between the reasons of females having tattoos or facial piercings and the dilemmas they are facing by review former researches. This paper reveals that there are still dilemmas for females who have tattoos or facial piercings to overcome in their lives. Different identities affect females in choosing to have tattoos or facial piercings. The reasons why females have tattoos or facial piercings stem from pursuing aesthetics, expressing emotions and expressing personalization. However, there are both positive and negative impacts on individual physical and mental development, academic and career development, and social interactions. This study offers a new idea of doing researches on females facing dilemmas with tattoos or facial piercings.
... Unjustly, women and people of color with tattoos experience more significant discrimination than men or White people (Baumann et al., 2016;Camacho & Brown, 2018;Guégen, 2013;Solanke, 2017). For example, women encounter prejudice when failing to gain employment due to having visible tattoos regardless of having excellent job qualifications (Al-Twal & Abuhassan, 2024;Henle et al., 2022). Moreover, women of color have experienced job discrimination by being questioned if they have visible or nonvisible tattoos (i.e., inkism), being forbidden from having or being required to cover tattoos regardless of cultural relevance (e.g., covering a traditional Māori tattoo), or being required to prove that they do not have tattoos-as alleged in a legal complaint against a Singaporean airline that required female attendants to wear a swimsuit and demonstrate to their employers that they did not have tattoos (Solanke, 2017, Chapter 8). ...
... According to Tews and Stafford (2019), employees with a higher number of visible tattoos tend to receive less favorable treatment, which is reflected in interpersonal relationships and perceived discrimination. Furthermore, these tattooed employees are commonly given reduced pay and judged as less competent in comparison to candidates who do not have visible tattoos (Henle et al., 2021). However, this job and wage discrimination is mainly affected by two factors: the type of profession and the age of the interviewers. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tattooing has been transforming its meaning over time, it is a practice related to fashion, the dominance of aesthetics over the body, beliefs, forms of expression and identity, a practice that has become commonplace in contemporary societies. The article is divided into two segments. The first summarizes a detailed review of 152 publications exploring various aspects of tattooing derived from a systematic review of the scientific production surrounding tattoos and how they have been conceived over time. The second includes an analysis of these articles based on their theoretical and conceptual contributions, expanding the literature on the study of tattooing (in categories such as: anthropological, gender perspectives, work environment considerations, medical factors and body modification practices). This research revealed a broad spectrum of conceptual and epistemological perspectives that have influenced the practice of skin inscription. It also highlights the important role that tattoos play in the practice of skin inscription.
... For example, individuals who adorn themselves with tattoos and piercings may not worry about the norms of the wider conventional society that disapproves of their overt display; in fact, they may use such body modifications to define their identity as outside societal norms, as unique or as members of a counterculture (Tiggemann & Hopkins 2011). Nevertheless, overt body modifications may be negatively judged by society and lead to reduced employment prospects or career opportunities (Henle et al. 2022). Such possible costs, even if only perceived, may deter individuals from deviating from the supposed norm. ...
Article
Social norms have long been considered across the social and behavioral sciences for their effects on human behavior. This review focuses on norms that explicitly or implicitly convey socially shared views about what people should or should not do. Such injunctive norms can be powerful influences on behavior through internalization or through formal or informal enforcement. They can underpin interventions to shape people's behavior through conformity but can also be drawn upon by individuals to question social practices. However, norms also have pitfalls and may fail to affect behavior as intended: They can pose a threat to the individual's self (autonomy, morality, values), compromise motives and social meanings (intrinsic motivation, trust, sincerity), or be egocentrically reconstrued (through biased perceptions and selective social/temporal referents). Depending on one's stance on an issue, such pitfalls may also be turned into powers to inoculate against undesirable norms or to advance social change.
... For example, individuals who adorn themselves with tattoos and piercings may not worry about the norms of the wider conventional society that disapproves of their overt display; in fact, they may use such body modifications to define their identity as outside societal norms, as unique or as members of a counterculture (Tiggemann & Hopkins 2011). Nevertheless, overt body modifications may be negatively judged by society and lead to reduced employment prospects or career opportunities (Henle et al. 2022). Such possible costs, even if only perceived, may deter individuals from deviating from the supposed norm. ...
Research
Full-text available
Tattoos in the professional world have long been stigmatized despite growing societal acceptance and an increase in tattooed individuals. Research on the challenges faced by tattooed professionals during the job application process remains limited. Using a phenomenological approach and purposive sampling, this study explores the lived experiences of tattooed professionals and their encounters with workplace stigma. Interviews with 8 participants revealed that many chose to cover their tattoos during job interviews to avoid bias, reflecting the conservative nature of the white-collar industry. While overt discrimination was not reported, participants felt compelled to conform to industry standards, hoping for eventual acceptance. The employer responses varied, some indicating no discrimination based on company policies, others noted that client perceptions and industry norms still influence hiring practices. The study concludes that the impact of visible tattoos on professional experiences has a complex interplay between personal identity, societal norms, and workplace environments. As industries evolve, there is hope that greater understanding and adaptability will pave the way for more inclusive practices that reflect the diverse expressions of today's workforce. This study contributes valuable insights into the dynamics of tattoo acceptance in the workplace and calls for further research and advocacy to promote inclusivity and diversity.
Article
This exploratory study contributes to the literature on disclosing concealable stigmatized identities (CSI) by positing authenticity and identity centrality as antecedents to disclosing body art within a workplace context. We analyze identity centrality and its effect on amplifying or suppressing disclosure and/or fear of disclosure of white‐collar professionals' body art. The research question focuses on whether white‐collar employees believe they can be authentic and disclose body art in the workplace and whether there are adverse career outcomes associated with disclosing body art. Findings suggest authenticity was only related to the degree of disclosure through fear of disclosure, highlighting the role that fear played in the disclosure decision. Identity centrality moderated the relationship between authenticity and fear of disclosure. Both fear of and degree of disclosure were indirectly related to turnover intentions through affective organizational commitment. Given the limited research on body art as a stigma and its disclosure by white‐collar professionals, we believe this study adds to the CSI literature by offering insights into the impact that changing social mores associated with body art may have on the willingness of white‐collar professionals to disclose it.
Article
L’apparence physique est l’un des premiers critères de discrimination en France. Pourtant, peu de travaux s’intéressent à la discrimination et l’inclusion des personnes tatouées en France, contrairement à la littérature anglo-saxonne. Face à cette absence de littérature, nous avons cherché à comprendre de quelle manière le tatouage, en tant que composante manipulable de l’apparence physique, est accepté dans le monde du travail en France. Notre étude exploratoire qualitative auprès de personnes tatouées et de recruteurs montre que les personnes tatouées cachent majoritairement leurs tatouages de peur des préjugés sociaux et de leurs conséquences. Le discours des recruteurs, par effet miroir, montre que le tatouage n’est pas un problème. tant qu’il ne se voit pas. Cette dialogique entre le visible et l’invisible crée un conflit entre le soi interne et le soi externe. Ceci amène les personnes tatouées à adopter une authenticité que nous qualifions d’entravée et questionne le fait d’être authentiquement soi au travail avec des conséquences sur l’engagement et le bien-être au travail de ces personnes. Cela constitue une discrimination discrète mais réelle à leur encontre, révélatrice de dissonances entre les discours et les pratiques d’inclusion des organisations. En conséquence, il apparait nécessaire pour les organisations d’intégrer le tatouage dans leurs politiques d’inclusion et de réfléchir aux composantes et aux limites de l’authenticité de soi au travail pour être véritablement inclusives. Les recherches sur l’inclusion doivent également à l’avenir mieux intégrer la dimension de l’apparence physique et celle du tatouage.
Article
Full-text available
Many organizational representatives review social media (SM) information (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) when recruiting and assessing job applicants. Despite this, very little empirical data exist concerning the SM information available to organizations or whether assessments of such information are a valid predictor of work outcomes. This multistudy investigation examines several critical issues in this emerging area. In Study 1, we conducted a content analysis of job seekers' Facebook sites (n = 266) and found that these sites often provide demographic variables that U.S. employment laws typically prohibit organizations from using when making personnel decisions (e.g., age, ethnicity, and religion), as well as other personal information that is not work-related (e.g., sexual orientation, marital status). In Study 2 (n = 140), we examined whether job seekers' SM information is related to recruiter evaluations. Results revealed that various types of SM information correlated with recruiter judgments of hireability, including demographic variables (e.g., gender, marital status), variables organizations routinely assess (e.g., education, training, and skills), and variables that may be a concern to organizations (e.g., profanity, sexual behavior). In Study 3 (n = 81), we examined whether structuring SM assessments (e.g., via rater training) affects criterion-related validity. Results showed that structuring SM assessments did not appear to improve the prediction of future job performance or withdrawal intentions. Overall, the present findings suggest that organizations should be cautious about assessing SM information during the staffing process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Amazon Mechanical Turk is an increasingly popular data source in the organizational psychology research community. This paper presents an evaluation of MTurk and provides a set of practical recommendations for researchers using MTurk. Design/Methodology/Approach We present an evaluation of methodological concerns related to the use of MTurk and potential threats to validity inferences. Based on our evaluation, we also provide a set of recommendations to strengthen validity inferences using MTurk samples. Findings Although MTurk samples can overcome some important validity concerns, there are other limitations researchers must consider in light of their research objectives. Researchers should carefully evaluate the appropriateness and quality of MTurk samples based on the different issues we discuss in our evaluation. Implications There is not a one-size-fits-all answer to whether MTurk is appropriate for a research study. The answer depends on the research questions and the data collection and analytic procedures adopted. The quality of the data is not defined by the data source per se, but rather the decisions researchers make during the stages of study design, data collection, and data analysis. Originality/Value The current paper extends the literature by evaluating MTurk in a more comprehensive manner than in prior reviews. Past review papers focused primarily on internal and external validity, with less attention paid to statistical conclusion and construct validity—which are equally important in making accurate inferences about research findings. This paper also provides a set of practical recommendations in addressing validity concerns when using MTurk.
Article
Full-text available
Although adorning the body by means of tattoos and body piercings is an ancient practice, it has become increasing popular as of late in Western cultures including the United States. The increasing popularity of body art has been most apparent among young adults and has given rise to a growth industry catering to these consumers. Little attention has been paid to the increasing popularity of body art from the marketing perspective. Since individuals engaged in a variety of marketing-related activities must interact with consumers on a face-to-face basis, it is important to understand the manner in which individuals with body art are perceived. The general purpose of this study was to investigate attitudes toward persons with body art. Data were collected by means of a survey of college students that included 496 respondents at 14 geographically diverse colleges and universities in the U.S. The results indicated that over 40 % of those responding reported that they possessed some form of body art. An analysis of three derived factors revealed that there are both positive as well as negative attitudes associated with persons who possess body art. The implications for the field of marketing management are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated the effects of unemployment duration, volunteerism and age on perceptions of unemployed job candidates. An experimental design was employed in which participants judged fictitious resumes of unemployed candidates. We found that candidates unemployed for 18 months were viewed as less qualified and would be less likely to be interviewed and hired than those unemployed for 6 or 12 months at all age levels (30, 40, 50) studied. Candidates who had performed volunteer work (career- or non-career-related) would be more likely to be interviewed and hired than those who had not volunteered. Implications of the findings were discussed.
Article
Statistical control of extraneous (i.e., third) variables is a common analytic tool among leadership researchers. While such a strategy is typically assumed to prove beneficial, it can actually introduce various complications that are underestimated or even ignored. This study investigates and summarizes the current state of control variable usage in leadership research by qualitatively and quantitatively examining the use of statistical control variables in 10 highly regarded management and applied psychology journals. Despite available “best practices,” our results indicate that control variable usage in existing leadership studies is rarely grounded in theory but instead frequently relies on outdated misconceptions. Moreover, a meta-analysis of the relationships between popular control variables and leadership constructs finds nearly universal weak effect sizes, suggesting that many studies may not only be losing valuable degrees of freedom but also making inferences based on biased parameter estimates. To address these issues, we put forth a number of recommendations to assist leadership scholars with determining whether potential third variables should be controlled for in their leadership research.
Article
Using mixed methods, this article examines the role of body art as a form of branded labour in customer-facing jobs. It brings together employee selection and relationship marketing into one framework, and uniquely conceptualizes body art as an asset in the labour market, rather than the traditional liability. In Study 1, 192 respondents with management experience participated in an online laboratory experiment in which they were asked to rate photographs of tattooed and non-tattooed job applicants in two hypothetical organizations: a fine dining restaurant and a popular nightclub. In Study 2, 20 in-depth, qualitative interviews were carried out with managers, tattooed front-line employees and potential consumers in two real-world service sector firms. The results show how body art can be strategically used to positively convey the brand of organizations, primarily those targeting a younger, ‘edgier’ demographic of customer.
Article
We provide new evidence that the subjective “look of competence” rather than beauty is important for CEO selection and compensation. Our experiments, studying the facial traits of CEOs using nearly 2,000 subjects, link facial characteristics to both CEO compensation and performance. In one experiment, we use pairs of photographs and find that subjects rate CEO faces as appearing more “competent” than non-CEO faces. Another experiment matches CEOs from large firms against CEOs from smaller firms and finds large-firm CEOs look more competent. In a third experiment, subjects numerically score the facial traits of CEOs. We find competent looks are priced into CEO compensation, more so than attractiveness. Our evidence suggests this premium has a behavioral origin. First, we find no evidence that the premium is associated with superior performance. Second, we separately analyze inside and outside CEO hires and find that the competence compensation premium is driven by outside hires—the situation where first impressions are likely to be more important. This paper was accepted by Lauren Cohen, finance.