Article

Ultraconformable, Self‐Adhering Surface Electrodes for Measuring Electrical Signals in Plants

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The electrical signals in plant's physiological processes are of great interest in biology, biohybrid robotics, and sensors for interfacing the living organisms with an electronic readout and control. This paper reports on the application of conformable, self‐adhering surface electrodes for the measurement and bidirectional stimulation of electrical signals in plants. The inkjet‐printed poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate based electrodes are <3 µm thick, light‐weight, soft and flexible, and can be easily and non‐invasively transferred onto plant's outer organs for surface potential recordings due to their realization on tattoo transfer paper. The devices prove to be extremely versatile for analyzing electrical signals in Dionaea muscipula, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Codariocalyx motorius and for stimulating mechanical responses in D. muscipula. A benefit over traditional electrodes is the van der Waals self‐adherence of the thin electrodes, their intrinsic flexibility and adaptation also on small leaves while providing excellent readout. The same electrode allows long‐term multicycle measurements over at least 10 days and, moreover, straightforward recordings on fast‐moving organs such as snapping fly traps and endogenously oscillating leaflets. The results confirm that self‐adhering soft organic electronics are particularly suitable for plant electrical signal analysis when easy‐application, self‐adaptation, and long‐term performance are required in plant science, biohybrid robotics, and biohybrid sensors. Soft, organic electronics that adapt perfectly to multiple surfaces provide new opportunities in interfacing, recording, and bidirectionally stimulating electrical signals in plants. The conformable electrodes applied to measure plant's electrical signals in this paper contribute a novel interface for plant‐hybrid robots and new sensors for biology and agriculture.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The paper describes the electrical plant response to mechanical stimulation monitored with the help of conducting polymers deposited on cotton fabric. Cotton fabric was coated with conducting polymers, polyaniline or polypyrrole, in situ during the oxidation of respective monomers in aqueous medium. Thus, modified fabrics were again coated with polypyrrole or polyaniline, respectively, in order to investigate any synergetic effect between both polymers with respect to conductivity and its stability during repeated dry cleaning. The coating was confirmed by infrared spectroscopy. The resulting fabrics have been used as electrodes to collect the electrical response to the stimulation of a Venus flytrap plant. This is a paradigm of the use of conducting polymers in monitoring of plant neurobiology.
Article
Full-text available
This review introduces the characteristics of electrical signals in higher plants and their corresponding physiological significance, and describes in detail the impact of environmental factors (e.g. light and temperature) on the electrical potential of the plants. Also, we evaluate the measurement techniques used for electrical signals in plants, including intracellular measurement, extracellular measurement, measurement of the ion channel based on the patch-clamp technique and on the non-invasive microelectrode vibrating probe technique. We also give a brief review of the applications of these methods for investigating electrical signals in plants. The ionic mechanism of electrical activity in plants is then discussed in terms of environmental response in higher plants, and this is used to provide a theoretical basis for quantitative description of the electrical signals in plants. A model for interpretation of the electrical signal mechanisms in higher plants is discussed, but further experiments are required for the verification of this model.
Article
The leaflet rhythm of Desmodium gyrans, the period of which is in the minute range, was investigated by application of direct current pulses through the pulvinus. The current was generated in a current clamp device, and applied via a 0.1 mm copper wire electrode to the tip of the leaflet and to the base of the leaf stalk. Currents of 2, 5 or 10 µA were applied for 1 s, being kept at a constant value by the clamp electronics. The phase shift was in all cases a delay, attained after transients of four or five periods. The shifts were longer with increasing current. The electronic equipment developed to attain the current pulses is described.
Article
The involvement of electrical signaling in the regulation of gas exchange was checked with maize plants subjected to a drying cycle of 5 days in a controlled environment. Gas exchange and extracellular electrical potential measurements were made on attached leaves. The CO2 uptake and transpiration rate decreased in drying soil and increased to their original values after irrigation. Continuous records of the electrical potential difference between two surface points were made on the same leaf on which the gas measurements were performed. A daily rhythm was clearly visible and seemed to be correlated with the soil water status. After soil drying the plants were watered and increases in CO2 and H2O exchange have been demonstrated to follow the arrival of an electrical signal in the leaves. When a dye solution was applied to the roots its uptake and movement to the leaves was observed continuously by microscopy showing that the increase of gas exchange 12–15 min after irrigation could not be triggered by water ascent. By using severed aphid stylets it was shown that sieve tubes served as a pathway for electrical signal transmission. Furthermore, roots were water-stressed by addition of non-penetrating osmolyte to the root medium. The gas exchange of the leaves decreased clearly 6 min after application of polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG, −0.5 MPa water potential). Comparative measurements of the sieve tube electrical potential indicated that PEG-induced water stress evoked a propagating depolarization of the potential. Other osmolytes (100 mM NaCl) caused similar results showing that the leaf responses are not related to any specific toxic effect of PEG. Thus, the results strongly support the view that electrical signaling plays an important role in root to shoot communication of water-stressed plants.
  • D.-H Kim
  • N Lu
  • R Ma
  • Y.-S Kim
  • R.-H Kim
  • S Wang
  • J Wu
  • S M Won
  • H Tao
  • A Islam
  • K Y Yu
  • T Kim
  • R Chowdhury
  • M Ying
  • L Xu
  • M Li
  • H.-J Chung
  • H Keum
  • M Mccormick
  • P Liu
  • Y.-W Zhang
  • F G Omenetto
  • Y Huand
  • T Coleman
  • J A Rogers
D.-H. Kim, N. Lu, R. Ma, Y.-S. Kim, R.-H. Kim, S. Wang, J. Wu, S. M. Won, H. Tao, A. Islam, K. Y. Yu, T. Kim, R. Chowdhury, M. Ying, L. Xu, M. Li, H.-J. Chung, H. Keum, M. McCormick, P. Liu, Y.-W. Zhang, F. G. Omenetto, Y. Huand, T. Coleman, J. A. Rogers, Science 2011, 333, 838.
  • Y Liu
  • M Pharr
  • G A Salvatore
Y. Liu, M. Pharr, G. A. Salvatore, ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9614.
  • D Ohayon
D. Ohayon, S. Inal, Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001439.
  • Z Rao
  • F Ershad
  • A Almasri
  • L Gonzalez
  • X Wu
  • C Yu
Z. Rao, F. Ershad, A. Almasri, L. Gonzalez, X. Wu, C. Yu, Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 2000233.
  • J Fromm
  • S Lautner
J. Fromm, S. Lautner, Plant, Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 249.
  • A G Volkov
A. G. Volkov, Int. J. Parallel, Emergent Distrib. Syst. 2017, 32, 44.
  • S Gilroy
  • M Białasek
  • N Suzuki
  • M Górecka
  • A R Devireddy
  • S Karpiński
  • R Mittler
S. Gilroy, M. Białasek, N. Suzuki, M. Górecka, A. R. Devireddy, S. Karpiński, R. Mittler, Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1606.
  • T Skrzypczak
  • R Krela
  • W Kwiatkowski
  • S Wadurkar
  • A Smoczyńska
  • P Wojtaszek
T. Skrzypczak, R. Krela, W. Kwiatkowski, S. Wadurkar, A. Smoczyńska, P. Wojtaszek, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 46.
  • S A R Mousavi
  • A Chauvin
  • F Pascaud
  • S Kellenberger
  • E E Farmer
S. A. R. Mousavi, A. Chauvin, F. Pascaud, S. Kellenberger, E. E. Farmer, Nature 2013, 500, 422.
  • R Hedrich
  • V Salvador-Recatalà
  • I Dreyer
R. Hedrich, V. Salvador-Recatalà, I. Dreyer, Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 376.
  • S A R Mousavi
  • C T Nguyen
  • E E Farmer
  • S Kellenberger
S. A. R. Mousavi, C. T. Nguyen, E. E. Farmer, S. Kellenberger, Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 1997.
  • J Böhm
  • S Scherzer
  • S Shabala
  • E Krol
  • E Neher
  • T D Mueller
  • R Hedrich
J. Böhm, S. Scherzer, S. Shabala, E. Krol, E. Neher, T. D. Mueller, R. Hedrich, Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 428.
  • S Scherzer
  • W Federle
  • K A S Al-Rasheid
  • R Hedrich
S. Scherzer, W. Federle, K. A. S. Al-Rasheid, R. Hedrich, Nat. Plants. 2019, 5, 670.
  • B Mazzolai
  • L Beccai
  • V Mattoli
B. Mazzolai, L. Beccai, V. Mattoli, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2, 2.
  • E Del Dottore
  • A Sadeghi
  • A Mondini
  • V Mattoli
  • B Mazzolai
E. Del Dottore, A. Sadeghi, A. Mondini, V. Mattoli, B. Mazzolai, Front. Rob. AI 2018, 5, 16.
  • I Fiorello
  • E Dottore
  • F Tramacere
  • B Mazzolai
I. Fiorello, E. Del Dottore, F. Tramacere, B. Mazzolai, Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 2020, 15, 031001.
  • M K Heinrich
  • S Von Mammen
  • D N Hofstadler
  • M Wahby
  • P Zahadat
  • T Skrzypczak
  • M Di
  • R Soorati
  • W Krela
  • T Kwiatkowski
  • P Schmickl
  • K Ayres
  • H Stoy
  • Hamann
M. K. Heinrich, S. Von Mammen, D. N. Hofstadler, M. Wahby, P. Zahadat, T. Skrzypczak, M. Di. Soorati, R. Krela, W. Kwiatkowski, T. Schmickl, P. Ayres, K. Stoy, H. Hamann, J. R. Soc. Interface 2019, 16, 20190238.
  • I Must
  • E Sinibaldi
  • B Mazzolai
I. Must, E. Sinibaldi, B. Mazzolai, Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 344.
  • J P Giraldo
  • H Wu
  • G M Newkirk
  • S Kruss
J. P. Giraldo, H. Wu, G. M. Newkirk, S. Kruss, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 541.
  • T Thomas
  • S Lew
  • V B Koman
  • P Gordiichuk
  • M Park
  • M S Strano
T. Thomas, S. Lew, V. B. Koman, P. Gordiichuk, M. Park, M. S. Strano, Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 5, 1900657.
  • H Sareen
H. Sareen, Cyborg Botany: Augmented Plants as Sensors, Displays and Actuators, Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, Cambridge, MA 2017.
  • J J Kim
  • L K Allison
  • T L Andrew
J. J. Kim, L. K. Allison, T. L. Andrew, Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw0463.
  • S M Khan
  • S F Shaikh
  • N Qaiser
  • M M Hussain
S. M. Khan, S. F. Shaikh, N. Qaiser, M. M. Hussain, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 2892.
  • S Oren
  • H Ceylan
  • P S Schnable
  • L Dong
S. Oren, H. Ceylan, P. S. Schnable, L. Dong, Adv. Mater. Technol. 2017, 2, 1700223.
  • K Lee
  • J Park
  • M Lee
  • J Kim
  • B G Hyun
  • D J Kang
  • K Na
  • C Y Lee
  • F Bien
  • J.-U Park
K. Lee, J. Park, M. Lee, J. Kim, B. G. Hyun, D. J. Kang, K. Na, C. Y. Lee, F. Bien, J.-U. Park, Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2647.
  • F Zhao
  • J He
  • X Li
  • Y Bai
  • Y Ying
  • J Ping
F. Zhao, J. He, X. Li, Y. Bai, Y. Ying, J. Ping, Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 170, 112636.
  • A Takemoto
  • T Araki
  • T Uemura
  • Y Noda
  • S Yoshimoto
  • S Izumi
  • S Tsuruta
A. Takemoto, T. Araki, T. Uemura, Y. Noda, S. Yoshimoto, S. Izumi, S. Tsuruta, Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 2000093.
  • J J Kim
  • R Fan
  • L K Allison
  • T L Andrew
J. J. Kim, R. Fan, L. K. Allison, T. L. Andrew, Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc3296.
  • A G Volkov
A. G. Volkov, Bioelectrochemistry 2019, 125, 25.
  • G R A De Toledo
  • A G Parise
  • F Z Simmi
  • A V L Costa
  • L G S Senko
  • M.-W Debono
  • G M Souza
G. R. A. de Toledo, A. G. Parise, F. Z. Simmi, A. V. L. Costa, L. G. S. Senko, M.-W. Debono, G. M. Souza, Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2019, 31, 21.
  • A G Volkov
  • C L Vilfranc
  • V A Murphy
  • C M Mitchell
  • M I Volkova
  • L O'neal
  • V S Markin
A. G. Volkov, C. L. Vilfranc, V. A. Murphy, C. M. Mitchell, M. I. Volkova, L. O'Neal, V. S. Markin, J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 838.
  • R Hedrich
  • E Neher
R. Hedrich, E. Neher, Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 220.
  • A Zucca
  • C Cipriani
  • S T Sudha
  • D Ricci
  • V Mattoli
  • F Greco
A. Zucca, C. Cipriani, Sudha, S. T., D. Ricci, V. Mattoli, F. Greco, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2015, 4, 983.
  • L M Ferrari
  • S Sudha
  • S Tarantino
  • R Esposti
  • F Bolzoni
  • P Cavallari
  • C Cipriani
  • V Mattoli
  • F Greco
L. M. Ferrari, S. Sudha, S. Tarantino, R. Esposti, F. Bolzoni, P. Cavallari, C. Cipriani, V. Mattoli, F. Greco, Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700771.
  • J Böhm
  • S Scherzer
  • E Krol
  • I Kreuzer
  • K Meyer
  • C Lorey
  • T D Mueller
  • L Shabala
  • I Monte
  • R Solano
  • K A S Al-Rasheid
  • H Rennenberg
  • S Shabala
  • E Neher
  • R Hedrich
J. Böhm, S. Scherzer, E. Krol, I. Kreuzer, K. Von Meyer, C. Lorey, T. D. Mueller, L. Shabala, I. Monte, R. Solano, K. A. S. Al-Rasheid, H. Rennenberg, S. Shabala, E. Neher, R. Hedrich, Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 286.
  • D Alemu
  • H Y Wei
  • K C Ho
  • C W Chu
D. Alemu, H. Y. Wei, K. C. Ho, C. W. Chu, Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9662.
  • I Mouravieff
I. Mouravieff, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1976, 273, 927.