A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Journal of Fish Biology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
REGULAR PAPER
An integrative taxonomic review of the Natal mountain catfish,
Amphilius natalensis Boulenger 1917 (Siluriformes,
Amphiliidae), with description of four new species
Daniel Nkosinathi Mazungula
1,2
| Albert Chakona
1,2
1
National Research Foundation –
South African Institute for Aquatic
Biodiversity, Makhanda (Grahamstown),
South Africa
2
Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries
Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda
(Grahamstown), South Africa
Correspondence
Daniel Nkosinathi Mazungula, National
Research Foundation –South African Institute
for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015,
Makhanda (Grahamstown) 6140, South Africa.
Email: n.mazungula@saiab.ac.za
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by the
Rhodes University Research Council Grant and
the National Research Foundation (NRF) of
South Africa under the Foundational
Biodiversity Information Programme:
Biodiversity surveys in priority inland areas
(FBIP) grants (grant reference no. IBIP-
BS13100251309). The University of
Zimbabwe is acknowledged for providing the
research vehicle used for surveys in the
Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe. We hereby
acknowledge the use of infrastructure,
equipment and specimens provided by the
NRF-SAIAB's Aquatic Genomics Research
Platform, Margaret Smith Library, Collections
Division Platform, and the funding channelled
through the NRF-SAIAB Institutional Support
System.
Abstract
An integrative taxonomic analysis combining mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase sub-
unit I sequences, morphology, colour pattern and two species delimitation
approaches revealed the existence of five lineages within the Natal mountain catfish,
Amphilius natalensis, in southern Africa. These lineages are separated by substantial
genetic divergences (1.6%–9.46%), and they can be consistently distinguished from
one another based on a combination of morphology and colour pattern differences.
Additionally, the lineages are allopatrically distributed and confined to isolated river
systems draining discrete mountain ranges, which makes gene flow among them
unlikely. One of these lineages is A. natalensis s.s., which is confined to the uMngeni
and Tukela river systems in KwaZulu Natal (KZN) Province in South Africa. The other
four lineages represent new species to science which are described as Amphilius
zuluorum sp. nov., endemic to the uMkhomazi River system in KZN, Amphilius
engelbrechti sp. nov., endemic to the Inkomati River system in Mpumalanga Province
in South Africa, Amphilius marshalli sp. nov., endemic to the Pungwe and Lower Zam-
bezi river systems in Zimbabwe and Mozambique, and Amphilius leopardus sp. nov.,
endemic to the Ruo River in Malawi. The results show that Amphilius laticaudatus
which is endemic to the Buzi River system in Zimbabwe and Mozambique, belongs to
the A. natalensis s.l. complex. A redescription of A. laticaudatus is presented and an
updated identification key for the mountain catfishes of southern Africa is provided.
KEYWORDS
Afromontane streams, DNA barcoding, eastern Zimbabwe highlands, Maloti-Drakensberg,
mountain catfish, Mulanji mountain, rheophilic, southern Africa
1|INTRODUCTION
Accurate documentation of biodiversity and knowledge of species dis-
tribution ranges is essential for understanding evolutionary drivers of
diversification, biogeographic history and landscape evolution
(Chakona et al., 2013a; Day et al., 2013, 2017; Van Steenberge
et al., 2020), and also provides basic information for ecological studies
and conservation (Bickford et al., 2007). However, accurate delinea-
tion of species is challenging, particularly for cryptic species or taxa
that exhibit high levels of morphological conservatism, which makes it
difficult to identify consistent diagnostic characters of specific value
(Bickford et al., 2007; Gómez et al., 2002; Suatoni et al., 2006). Inte-
grative taxonomy, or the use of multiple sources of evidence, includ-
ing genomic, morphological, anatomical, physiological, ecological,
behavioural and geographical information, has been proposed as a
* urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E112603-56CE-426F-B574-9421C2B97878
Received: 31 July 2020 Accepted: 23 February 2021
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14714
FISH
J Fish Biol. 2021;99:219–239. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jfb © 2021 Fisheries Society of the British Isles. 219