Preprint

Political Behavior and Attitudes of LGB Voters in Brazil's 2018 Election

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
To read the file of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This work investigates the relationship between identitarian sexual orientation and political behavior of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) voters in Brazil, 2018. Political and voting behavior studies have largely addressed different constituencies in terms of sociodemographic and attitudinal aspects in consolidated and new democracies. Sexual identity, however, has not been systematically investigated by political scientists in Brazil. Using a representative sample of voters during the 2018's electoral cycle, the paper addresses the role of LGB self-identification in political attitudes and behavior. The data comes from a survey conducted by Datafolha Institute in October 2018 with adult Brazilians (N: 9,173; N of LGB: 654). The dependent variable of interest is voting intention in the 2018 presidential runoff. Logistic regressions were employed to assess if and how LGB identification shaped political preference. The findings suggest that LGB voters are different from heterosexual ones in some aspects, but not as much as suggested by extant literature. More importantly, LGB identification was a strong predictor of voting intention for Jair Bolsonaro in 2018.

No file available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the file of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Does the recent electoral success of far-right populists represent a mere rejection of the political and economic status quo, or has it revealed deeper cultural divides? Historically, demographic cleavages have been poor predictors of vote choice and partisanship in Latin America. However, during Brazil’s 2018 presidential election campaign, right-wing candidate Jair Bolsonaro fomented conflict across lines of gender, race, and religion. We argue that his candidacy activated latent, previously unexploited grievances in the electorate. Using survey data from an original five-wave online panel conducted between July 2018 and January 2019, we examine the effect of demographic cleavages on presidential vote choice. In stark contrast to prior elections, we find clear evidence of demographic divides in 2018, partially mediated by issue positions. Bolsonaro’s campaign and subsequent election thus appear to have created new identity-based alignments in Brazil’s electorate. Our findings shed further light on the global resurgence of the far right, suggesting that far-right candidates can attract new bases of support through demographic polarization, exploiting differences in values and issue preferences by gender, race, ethnicity, and religion.
Article
Full-text available
A teoria da ordenação social explica o comportamento do eleitorado brasileiro na disputa presidencial de 2018? A literatura americanista demonstra que o alinhamento de identidades sociais gera e reforça o partidarismo como uma identidade principalmente no campo da direita. Tendo em vista a relevância de temáticas de crença religiosa, raça e gênero nas eleições de 2018, cabe compreender se o mesmo fenômeno também se verifica no Brasil. Essa pergunta é respondida com testes econométricos baseados em dados de um survey nacionalmente representativo conduzido com 1.498 eleitores no primeiro semestre de 2019. As regressões logísticas binomiais e multinomiais demonstram que protestantes, brancos e homens têm preferência substantivamente superior pelo PSL em comparação aos demais partidos, tanto em termos de definição de voto como de identificação partidária.
Article
Full-text available
Este artigo tem como objetivo avaliar o efeito da ideologia sobre o voto em Bolsonaro na eleição presidencial de 2018. Nosso argumento é que, após um longo período de ação discreta sobre o comportamento político dos brasileiros, os fatores ideológicos voltaram a ter relevância. A partir de uma perspectiva contextualista, apresentamos indícios de que a reorganização da direita no parlamento, nas ruas e nos meios de comunicação e a oferta de uma candidatura de extrema direita na competição eleitoral criaram condições favoráveis para o alinhamento, no eleitorado, entre a ideologia e a escolha eleitoral em 2018. Os dados revelam que o brasileiro está mais ideologicamente orientado e confirmam o impacto da ideologia sobre o voto. Palavras-chave: ideologia; comportamento eleitoral; eleições 2018 Introdução A discussão sobre a relação entre ideologia e comportamento eleitoral tem uma longa tradição na ciência política, que remonta aos estudos seminais da escola de Michigan (Campbell et al., 1960; Converse, 2006a). Segundo esses estudos, o partidarismo é, exceto para a minoria de eleitores mais escolarizados e interessados por política, um tipo de identificação predominantemente afetiva, sendo, no limite, desprovido de conteúdo ideológico. A maioria dos eleitores seriam, então, ideologicamente inconsistentes. Desde então, reinou um pessimismo a respeito da capacidade de o eleitorado se orientar na política a partir de referências ideológicas (Kinder, 2006; Kinder e Kalmoe, 2017), agravado no caso das novas democracias (Bustikova e Zechmeister, 2017). No Brasil, diversos autores chegaram a conclusões semelhantes. Estudos desenvolvidos nas décadas de 1960, 1970 e 1980 (Cintra, 1968; Lamounier, 1980; Reis, 1978) mostraram a ausência de posições ideológicas em relação ao regime político na adesão das classes populares ao MDB. Estudos mais recentes têm identificado a compreensão
Article
Full-text available
The 2018 elections surprised most analysts and political scientists in Brazil and abroad. The competitive dynamic that opposed the PT and the PSDB in presidential elections since 1994 has been disrupted, resulting in a novelty for the Brazilian party system. The purpose of this research article is to identify the determinants of votes for Jair Bolsonaro in the two rounds of the 2018 presidential election from data collected by the Brazilian Electoral Study. By means of multivariate analyses of the two rounds of the presidential election, we found that flourishing 'antipetismo' (i.e. anti-Workers' Party sentiment), growing numbers of voters self-identifying as right wing and increased importance of variables linked to voters' political identification all underpinned the victory of Jair Bolsonaro.
Article
Full-text available
Nos últimos anos, a reação de grupos de direita/conservadores ao avanço de “pautas progressistas” é um dos temas que mais tem despertado o interesse de pesquisadores da ciência política no Brasil. O presente artigo busca contribuir para esse debate, analisando, no âmbito da Câmara dos Deputados, a atuação de lideranças de dois dos principais vetores dessa agenda conservadora: a bancada evangélica e a bancada da bala. Para tanto, o artigo examina discursos e projetos de lei formulados por parlamentares entre 2010 e 2017, argumentando que, se ainda não é possível afirmar que o fenômeno da “direita envergonhada” está perdendo força de modo generalizado na Câmara dos Deputados, destaca-se um grupo de deputados bastante ativo e ideologizado, relativamente desvinculado das famílias políticas tradicionais e capaz de mobilizar abertamente categorias identitárias ligadas à direita e/ou ao conservadorismo.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated the relationship between sexual orientations and the protest actions of adults in the United States. Drawing from General Social Survey data from 1996 to 2004, we found that lesbians, gays, and bisexuals were more than twice as likely to protest as heterosexuals. To account for this sexuality gap, we used Patrick Egan’s (2008) political distinctiveness theories to identify possible underlying causes of these protesting differences. After running several regressions, we found that sexuality and protesting relationships were moderated by issues of educational attainment, marital statuses, metropolitan residencies, political partisanships, governmental grievances, and gender role expectations.
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the relationship between people’s sexual identities and their tendencies to join political protests. When analyzing American National Election surveys from 2012 (n = 3813), gays and lesbians were more than twice as likely to protest as heterosexuals. To explain the increased activism of gays and lesbians, this study applied Patrick Egan’s theories of political distinctiveness to the ANES data. After running a set of hierarchal logistic regressions, the link between sexualities and protesting became insignificant when issues of age, education levels, friendships circles, group memberships, and political ideologies were introduced into regressions. This suggests that gays and lesbians protested more often because they are younger, more educated, integrated into political networks, and are more likely to notice the negative consequences of social inequalities than heterosexuals.
Article
Full-text available
Sampling has been the single most influential component of conducting research with lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations. Poor sampling designs can result in biased results that will mislead other researchers, policymakers, and practitioners. Investigators wishing to study LGB populations must therefore devote significant energy and resources to choosing a sampling approach and executing the sampling plan. The authors describe probability and nonprobability sampling methods used in LGB populations and critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the sampling methods they review. The authors conclude that no single sampling methodology is correct or incorrect for use in LGB populations; rather, researchers must evaluate advantages and disadvantages of each sampling methodology in the context of the specific research question and the research design. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
This article reviews major national population sex surveys that have asked questions about homosexuality focusing on conceptual and methodological issues, including the definitions of sex, the measured aspects of homosexuality, sampling and interviewing technique, and questionnaire design. Reported rates of major measures of same-sex attraction, behavior, partners, and sexual identity from surveys are also presented and compared. The study of homosexuality in surveys has been shaped by the research traditions and questions ranging from sexology to the epidemiology of HIV/AIDS. Sexual behavior has been a central topic at least since Kinsey. Issues of sexual attraction and/or orientation and sexual identity have emerged more recently. Differences in the treatment of men and women in the design and analysis of surveys as well as in the reported rates in different surveys, in different countries and time periods are also presented and discussed. We point out the importance of the consideration of both methodological and social change issues in assessing such differences.
Article
In many European democracies, political punditry has highlighted the attempts of political parties on the left to court the “lavender vote” of lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals. This article examines the presence of a gay vote in Western Europe with a focus on assessing the role of sexuality in shaping individuals’ political preferences and voting behaviour. Empirically, the effect of sexuality on both ideological identification as well as party vote choice is analysed. Using a cumulative dataset of eight rounds of the European Social Survey between 2002–2017, this article demonstrates that partnered lesbians and gay men are more likely than comparable heterosexuals to identify with the left, support leftist policy objectives, and vote for left‐of‐centre political parties. The analysis represents the first empirical cross‐national European study of the voting behaviour of homosexual individuals and sheds new light on the importance of sexuality as a predictor of political ideology and voting behaviour within the Western European context. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Article
This article uses the concepts of intersectionality and linked fate to understand the relationship between group identification and political behavior among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) and non-LGBTQ Latinx individuals. Drawing on the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS), we find that LGBTQ Latinx respondents report feelings of linked fate to both the Latinx and LGBTQ community, and that LGBTQ Latinx respondents exhibit more political participation than their non-LGBTQ Latinx counterparts. We then find that Latinx and LGBTQ linked fate are significant predictors of participation for non-LGBTQ respondents, and LGBTQ linked fate to predict LGBTQ Latinx participation. Finally, we provide evidence that suggests that feeling linked fate toward more than one marginalized group does not necessarily translate into participation in a greater number of political activities, demonstrating the complexity of group identification for predicting political participation. This study contributes to the theorizing of linked fate and political participation by deploying an intersectional lens that challenges assumptions of Latinx and LGBTQ intragroup political coherence and illuminates the complex effects that different kinds of linked fate have on political participation.
Article
The gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered (GLBT) population is a good example of a demographic group that has been understudied because it is difficult to develop a subsample of sufficient size from typical national samples. Here we exploit the extraordinary size of a 2006 online election day survey (with about 35,000 respondents) to examine how the GLBT community behaves politically. While it will surprise no one that this community bestowed little support on Stephen Harper's Conservative party in the 2006 federal election, the factors behind such a consistent vote pattern are not adequately understood. In order to shed more light on the voting behaviour of the GLBT electorate, we develop a socio-demographic profile of the group, and explore three explanatory angles: 1) salience of issue campaign dynamics, given that the same-sex marriage issue was prominent in 2006; 2) ideological and attitudinal proclivities; and 3) strategic considerations. Résumé. La population gaie, lesbiennes, bisexuels et transgenres (GLBT) est un exemple d'un groupe démographique qui a été peu étudié, car il est difficile de développer un sous-échantillon de taille suffisante à partir d'échantillons nationaux. Ici, nous exploitons la taille extraordinaire d'une enquête enligne du jour du scrutin fédérale du 2006 (avec environ 35.000 répondants) d'examiner comment la communauté GLBT se comporte politiquement. Bien qu'il ne surprendra personne que cette communauté accordé peu d'appui sur Parti conservateur de Stephen Harper lors de l'élection fédérale de 2006, les facteurs qui expliquent un tel motif ne sont pas bien compris. Afin de jeter plus de lumière sur le comportement de vote de l'électorat GLBT, nous développons un profil sociodémographique de cette groupe, et d'explorer trois angles explicatives: 1) pertinence de la question du mariage de même sexe, 2) tendances idéologiques, et 3) des considérations stratégiques.
Article
Lesbians, gays and bisexuals (LGBs) tend to affiliate with the Democratic Party and hold distinctively liberal views on a wide range of issues, including issues that have nothing to do with gay rights. Scholars have speculated - but never definitively shown - that LGBs acquire these distinctive attitudes through intra-group contact. Using pooled survey data that permits statistically powerful analyses of nationally representative samples of LGBs for the first time, this article finds evidence for two alternate mechanisms that play large roles in making LGBs politically distinctive: selection (LGBs are more likely to be brought up in environments associated with liberal views later in life) and conversion (the life event of adopting a gay identity appears to be accompanied by the acquisition of a cohesive set of liberal beliefs before having much contact with other LGBs).
Out and Voting: The Lesbian and Gay Vote in Congressional House Elections
  • R W Bailey
BAILEY, R. W. (1998) Out and Voting: The Lesbian and Gay Vote in Congressional House Elections. Washington, D.C.; National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
O poder da identidade. Tradução de Klauss Brandini Gerhardt. (A era da informação: economia, sociedade e cultura; v.2)
  • M Castells
CASTELLS, M. (2006) O poder da identidade. Tradução de Klauss Brandini Gerhardt. (A era da informação: economia, sociedade e cultura; v.2). São Paulo, SP: Paz e Terra.
Homosexuality and Civilization. Cambridge
  • L Crompton
CROMPTON, L. (2003) Homosexuality and Civilization. Cambridge; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Intenção de voto presidente -2º Turno. Outubro de 2018. Pesquisa 04696. Em: Banco de Dados do Cesop/Unicamp
  • Datafolha
DATAFOLHA. (2018) Intenção de voto presidente -2º Turno. Outubro de 2018. Pesquisa 04696. Em: Banco de Dados do Cesop/Unicamp. Disponível em: <https://www.cesop.unicamp.br/por/banco_de_dados/v/4545>. Acesso em: 10 fev.
Understanding the Gay and Lesbian Vote in '92. Public Perspectives
  • M Edelman
EDELMAN, M. (1993). Understanding the Gay and Lesbian Vote in '92. Public Perspectives, 4
Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Surveys
  • G Gates
GATES, G. (2009) Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Surveys. [Created by the Sexual Minority Assessment Research Team (SMART), a multidisciplinary and multi-institutional collaboration].
Latin American Perspectives, v.21, n.1 [Brazil in Transition: Democratization, Privatization, and Working-Class Resistance
  • J Green
GREEN, J. (1994) The Emergence of the Brazilian Gay Liberation Movement, 1977-1981. Latin American Perspectives, v.21, n.1 [Brazil in Transition: Democratization, Privatization, and Working-Class Resistance], p.38-55.
Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Voters in the
  • G Lewis
  • M A Rogers
  • K Sherrill
LEWIS, G.; ROGERS, M. A., SHERRILL, K. (2011) Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Voters in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. Politics & Policy, Volume 39, No. 5 (2011): 655-677.
Political Participation of LGBT Americans. Project VOTE Research Memo
  • V A Perez
PEREZ, V. A. (2014) Political Participation of LGBT Americans. Project VOTE Research Memo.
O campo da sexologia e seus efeitos sobre a política sexual
  • J Russo
RUSSO, J. (2011) O campo da sexologia e seus efeitos sobre a política sexual. In: CORRÊA, S;
Sexualidade e política na América Latina
  • R Parker
PARKER, R. (Org.) Sexualidade e política na América Latina [recurso eletrônico]: histórias, interseções e paradoxos. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA, p.174-187.
Na trilha do arco-íris: do movimento homossexual ao LGBT
  • J A Simões
  • R Facchini
SIMÕES, J. A.; FACCHINI, R. (2009) Na trilha do arco-íris: do movimento homossexual ao LGBT. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.