Conference PaperPDF Available

Covid-19 Humor in Memes and Image Macros: How psychological and linguistic humor categories relate to gender and age

Authors:

Abstract

Online humor can be a constructive way of dealing with psychologically and socially difficult situations. The pandemic affected a rise in the way all generations used social media applications to communicate during the social distancing and lockdown phases. Psychological research revealed how different psychological humor types were preferred among different generations. Linguistic investigations revealed how different linguistic types such as multimodal voicing, creative reappropriation and incongruity resolution are prevalent humorous features of memes in general and Covid-19 memes specifically. The key question remains how humorous Covid-19 memes and items shared via social media differ in such linguistic and psychological humor types across the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers and Generations X, Y and Z. To elucidate the conundrum what it is that some memes are considered funny to younger generations but not to older generations and the other way around, a corpus was compiled through a convenience sample. Around 240 German senior citizen students and students of English submitted demographic data and memes sent by friends, parents and grandparents during the pandemic which were imported into a qualitative data analysis software (MAXQDA 20). The corresponding demographic factors (age, sex, language, date sent) were annotated to each meme. In a second step, the memes were annotated firstly, according to psychological humor types and secondly, with linguistic humor types. Overall, almost 600 memes were coded with the youngest participant aged 13 and the oldest aged 93. The preliminary findings show that there are significant differences in the psychological humor categories in the usage of memes across generations. Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation used more affiliative humor in the Covid-19 memes, while Generations X applied the most aggressive humor and Generation Z the most self-deprecating memes. The linguistic humor types differ significantly as well: Generation Z applied personification and creative reappropriation as humor type significantly more than Baby Boomers. Further, the references to voicing, creative reappropriation applied to video games, cartoon characters and Netflix series which are unknown to older generations. All generations shared memes with incongruity resolution as humor type. This study therefore sheds light on how humor is used in memes and macros via social media apps varies across generations and might hint to possible lower response reactions between the generational groups.
Inke Du Bois, Bremen University
Hande Akin, Ekaterina Buchminska, Hasan Mir Saban, Megan Dwinger; Yooju
Sung, Svetlana Smolina
Bremen University, Germany
IPRA International Pragmatics Conference, University of Winterthur
June 28-July 1, 2021
!"#$%&'()*+,"-.)/0,01 23%)450 623%0,$7
27-"11 803%0- 23%)8030-24$"31
92:;0)"< !"340341
!"#$%&%' ()*#+,-.*/!0#
1"#23&,45#64(7&(8.9'#()*#$%&%'
1"!"#6':9;,<,7.9(<#+(8%7,4.%'
1"1"#23&,4#()*#=7%
1">"#?(4@#23&,4
1"A#6':9;,<,7.9(<#23&,4#+(8%7,4.%'
1"B#C.)73.'8.9#23&,4#+(8%7,4.%'
>"#$%8;,*,<,7:
>"!"#?(8(#9,<<%98.,)
>"1"#?(8(#()(<:'.'
>">"##$.D%*#$%8;,*' +;.#EF3(4%
A"#G.)*.)7'
A"!"6':9;,<,7.9(<#9(8%7,4.%' ()*#
A"1"#C.)73.'8.9#()*#=7%
A"1"#C.)73.'8.9#6':9;,<,7.9(<HC.)73.'8.9
B"#+,)9<3'.,)
'=)/0,01)$3)450)623%0,$7.
!"#$%&'"()*+&$,($)-"+%).
/ 0(#;3&()#4.7;8#94.'.'IJ#.&K<%&%)8(8.,)#,L#)%M#8%9;),<,7.%'#8;(8#(LL%98#K4.-(9:
N +;()7%#,L#9.-.<#4.7;8' O<,9@*,M)5#&('@ M%(4.)75#',9.(< *.'8()9.)75#8%'8.)7P#
OQ.)8,345#1R1RP
1*)&%&'"()*+&$,($)-"+%).
N+,-.*#!0#L,49%'#(#4%/.&(7.)(8.,)#,L#',9.(<#<.L%S
N?.7.8(<.T(8.,)#,L#M,4@.)7#M,4<*5#%*39(8.,)#()*#',9.(<#<.L%
UV;%#-.43'#.'#(#K,48(<5#7(8%M(:#W%8M%%)#,)%#M,4<*#()*#8;%#)%D8I#OX,:5#1R1RP
>=)?-28,24$71)23%)/0,01
!"#"$ $%&'" ("&)*'"$ +( ,+-"$ +()". )%"/ 0.12*3"$ &4$")5*674&.4
0.1+.8'*0)/ &.34&4'"$+2*)0+. &.34+9"'2&660.8 $1'06)$ :+' $1%"#&$;4
:<))&'3+ =>>?;
@()".74)%"/ '"6'"$".) &4'"5".)"A)*&20B&)0+. +( 90$*&2 &'8*#".)$
:C0880.$4=>?D;
E%"41+.$)0)*".) 6&')$ +( &.4*))"'&.1"74&$ F"22 &$ (&1)$ +' 0.(+'#&)0+.
6'"$".) 0.4)%" 30$1+*'$" $0)*&)0+.742"&3 )+ )%" $*11"$$(*2 0.)"'6'")&)0+.
+( &.4*))"'&.1" G9&.$4:?DH=74ID;
J+.)"A) 0$ '"("''"3 )+ &$ &$$*#"3 1+##+. 8'+*.35)%" $") +(
K&1-8'+*.3 (&1)$74&$$*#6)0+.$ &.34K"20"($ 6'"$*66+$"3 )+ "A0$) 0.4)%"
#".)&24#+3"2 +( )%" 6&')0106&.)$ :L1%0(('0. ?DDM;
!"#" &$ 1+##*.01&)09" &1) &.34#"30&)"3 &1)0+. :N+."$4&.34O+''0$74
=>>MP4QR$S*"B4T4<$2&.4:=>=?;
/0,01)$3)%$17"+-10
!"#"$%&'(%)"%*+","-%'$%'%."(/"%01%&0##2(+&'3+0(
42#'(%'."(&5%+(%36"%7/0-2&3+0(%'(-%-+$$"#+('3+0(%01%
#"#"$%892/'(3+:%;<<=>%?+..+($:%@A;<B
C0($3/2&3+0(%01%+-"(3+3+"$%,+36+(%'%$0&+'D%$5$3"#%,6+&6%(""-$%
-+.+3'D%3"&6(0D0.5
!"#"$%'/"%7"/$0('D+E"-%'(-%$+32'3"-%+(%$7"&+1+&%$0&+'D%
&0(3"F3$%'(-%36"5%/"G&/"'3"%'(-%&0##2(+&'3"%&"/3'+(%
$3'(&"$%30,'/-$%/"'D%D+*"-%"F7"/+"(&"$H
I6"$"%"F7"/+"(&"$%-+11"/%'&/0$$%&2D32/"$%'(-%."("/'3+0('D%
./027$H
I6"%J-+.+3'D%&0##2(+&'3+*"%&0#7"3"(&"K%*'/+"$%'&/0$$%
."("/'3+0($H
>=>)*+,"-)23% @80
64%-.,3'#4%'%(49;#,)#8;%#8,K.9S
G%)7#%8#(<"#O1R1RP#.)-%'8.7(8%*#8;%#4%<(8.,)';.K#W%8M%%)#;3&,4#'8:<%'#()*#
'3WY%98.-%#M%<</W%.)7#()*#8;%#&,*%4(8.)7#4,<%'#,L#93<834%#()*#(7%#.)#(#<(47%#'9(<%#
&%8(/()(<:'.'"#
=99,4*.)7#8,#8;%.4#4%'3<8'5#)%.8;%4#93<834(<#W(9@74,3)*#),4#(7%#&,*%4(8%#8;%#
4%<(8.,)#W%8M%%)#;3&,4#'8:<%'#()*#K':9;,<,7.9(<#;%(<8;
Z.'9;%88. %8#(<"#O1R1!P#L,93'%*#,)#'83*:.)7#+,-.*/!0#;3&,4#(KK4%9.(8.,)#.)#',9.(<#
&%*.(#9,&&3).9(8.,)"#
V;%:#L,3)*#,38#8;(8#U[9\,&K(4%* 8,#:,3)7#()*#&.**<%/(7%*#74,3K'5#&,4%#&(834%#
(*3<8'#Y3*7%*#],)/+,-.*#!0#;3&,4#('#L3)).%4#()*#+,-.*/!0#;3&,4#('#&,4%#
(-%4'.-%I#('#(7%#.'#,)%#,L#8;%#+,-.*/!0#4.'@#L(98,4'"
>=A)B2-C)*+,"-
!"#"$40.9+29"4$+#"4-0.34+(420.8*0$)0141'"&)090)/4&.341&''/4."8&)09"4
"9&2*&)0+.$4:U/."274=>?H;V
E%"4&0#4+(43&'-4%*#+'40$40.9&'0&K2/4)+41+.9"/4)'".1%&.)41'0)010$#4F%02"4
6+)".)0&22/4&#*$0.84.+.5)&'8")"34#"$$&8"4'"1"09"'$V4E%"420.8*0$)014
1'"&)090)/4+(4$&'1&$)014*))"'&.1"$40$40##".$"V4:U/."274=>?W74=>?HP4
X&')0.8)+.74=>>I;
U&'-4%*#+'41+##".)&'0"$4+()".41+##*.01&)"403"+2+80"$4&K+*)4)%"4
$+10+6+20)01&24$0)*&)0+.4:U/."274=>?H;V
U/."2 ")4&2V4$)*3/41+.(0'#$4)%&)4Y(+'4)%+$"4#+'"430$)&.)4('+#4)%"4"9".)Z74
'&)%"'4)%&.4K"0.84&41+60.84$)'&)"8/743&'-4%*#+'4Y#08%)46'+903"49"'/4
30(("'".)462"&$*'"$Z4:[*06"'$74=>>=\4WM=;V
>=D)?1E75";"8$72;)*+,"-)72408"-$01 F/2-4$3)04)2;)
>GGAH)I0J;0CH)04)2;)F>G>GK
6':9;,<,7.9(< 9(8%7,4: ?%L.).8.,)
Adaptive
Self-enhancing To augment one self
Affiliative To maintain and enhance interpersonal relationships
Maladaptive
Aggressive To enhance oneself at the expense of others
Self-defeating Self-deprecation
>=L)M$38+$14$7)*+,"-)72408"-$01)FNO1P+0J)>G'(K
C.)73.'8.9#9(8%7,4: ?%L.).8.,)
Creative reappropriation Taking elements from established contexts and weaving them into a new
expression (Miner, 2016 in Vasquez, 2020: 28)
Incongruity resolution A juxtaposition of two incongruous elements that invites readers to
“recognize this contrast and activate a process of inference…” (Alamán
and Rueda, 2016: 41)
Voicing Imitating and reproducing recognizable linguistic features in order to “voice”
particular individuals. (Vazquez, 2020: 9)
Ambient affiliation Conviviality, shared cultural knowledge (Varis and Blommaert 2015)
Parody Voicing someone with a different voice
Exaggeration The representation of something as more extreme or dramatic than it really
is
Paronymy The relationship between words partly identical in form and/or meaning,
which may cause confusion in reception or production
Polysemy The coexistence of many possible meanings for a word or phrase
Personification The attribution of a personal nature or human characteristics to something
non-human
Register variation Inserting a different style of language into a text which is not typically
associated with the given text and/or context (Ruiz-Gurillo, 2016 in
Vasquez, 2020: 7)
A=)/045"%";"8E
:
Variationist Multimodal Pragmatic Approach (Du Bois 2021)
1. H1: Smart phone communication via memes with multimodal Covid-19
humor varies among different sexes and generations.
Convenience Sample: Around 250 students submitted 3-6 Covid-19 memes
that were sent from different generations (Dimock, M. 2019 Pew Research
Center) and sexes, which resulted in almost 800 memes including their
demographic data, such as age, date sent, gender.
1. Generation Z (1996-2010)
2. Generation Y (1980-1995)
3. Generation X (1965-1979)
4. Baby Boomers (1946-1964)
5. Silent Generation (1928-1945)
CLMN9G;<%OPQ9R!NC%
*Q/RS
O$5&60D0.+&'D Linguistic
§^)9,)743.8: X%',<38.,)
§+4%(8.-%#X%(KK4,K4.(8.,)
§6%4',).L.9(8.,)
§_,.9.)7
§+,3)84:/W('%*
§`D(77%4(8.,)a
§=LL.<.(8.-%
§=774%''.-%
§E%<L/%);()9.)7
§E%<L/*%L%(8.)7
!"#"$
J&')++.$
Silent Generation
Baby Boomers
Generation X
Generation Y
Generation Z
TU2,6;0)>.)/0,0)V-",)W2:E)W"",0-
English Translation:
If you recognize him you
belong to the risk group.
STAY AT HOME!!!
TU2,6;0)A.)/0,0)<-",)X030-24$"3)Y
A='=)*E6"450101
Ho: There is no relationship between the generations (age) and
psychological and linguistic humor types.
Ho: There is no relationship between the sexes and psychological and
linguistic humor types.
D=)Z0U)23%)*+,"-)9E601[
* There were no enbi or trans* people among the senders
Z0U)23%)M$38+$14$7)*+,"-)9E601
D=)X030-24$"31)23%)*+,"-)9E601
X030-24$"31)23%)?1E75";"8$72;)*+,"-
X030-24$"31)23%)!"#$%&'()9"6$71)$3)/0,01
D=)B$17+11$"3
I6"%."("/'3+0($%-+11"/%+(%)036%7$5&60D0.+&'D%'(-%D+(.2+$3+&%
62#0/%357"$H
S"("/'3+0(%T%2$"$ #0/" $"D1G-"1"'3+(. '(-%$"D1G"(6'(&+(.
62#0/H%
I6"%U')5%)00#"/$ 2$" #0/" '../"$$+*"%62#0/ 36'( 36"
036"/ ."("/'3+0($H%
PDD%."("/'3+0($ 2$" '11+D+'3+*" 62#0/ +(%C0*+-G;<%#"#"$
36" #0$3H
I6"$"%1+(-+(.$%$60,%36'3%36"/"%'/"%$+.(+1+&'(3%-+11"/"(&"$%
+(%36"%7$5&60D0.+&'D%62#0/%&'3".0/+"$%+(%36"%2$'."%01%
#"#"$%'&/0$$%."("/'3+0($H%
U')5%U00#"/$%'(-%36"%V+D"(3%S"("/'3+0(%2$"-%#0/"%
'11+D+'3+*"%62#0/%+(%36"%C0*+-G;<%#"#"$
I6"%D+(.2+$3+&%62#0/%357"$%-+11"/%$+.(+1+&'(3D5%
S"("/'3+0(%T%'77D+"-%7"/$0(+1+&'3+0(%'(-%&/"'3+*"%
/"'77/07/+'3+0(%'$%62#0/%357"%$+.(+1+&'(3D5%#0/"%36'(%
U')5%U00#"/$H%
D=)B$17+11$"3)X030-24$"32;)*+,"-
W2/36"/:%'#0(.%36"%502(.%."("/'3+0(:%36"/"%,"/"%
/"1"/"(&"$%30%*0+&+(.:%&/"'3+*"%/"'77/07/+'3+0(%'77D+"-%30%
*+-"0%.'#"$:%&'/300(%&6'/'&3"/$%'(-%Q"31D+F%$"/+"$%,6+&6%
'/"%2(X(0,(%30%0D-"/%."("/'3+0($H%
PDD%."("/'3+0($%$6'/"-%#"#"$%'(-%+#'."%#'&/0$%,+36%
+(&0(./2+35%/"$0D23+0(%'$%62#0/%357"H%
D=)B$17+11$"3)X030-24$"32;)*+,"-
W"#'D" '(-%#'D" $"F"$%836"/"%,'$%(0%"()+%0/%3/'($Y%
."(-"/%$"(-"/%'#0(.%36+$%./027B%%-+-%(03%-+11"/%
$+.(+1+&'(3D5%+(%36"%D+(.2+$3+&%62#0/%357"$%36"5%2$"-%,6"(%
$"(-+(.%#"#"$%'(-%+#'."%#'&/0$H%
40,"*"/:%36"%#'D"%$"(-"/$%2$"-%#0/"%*'/+"-%D+(.2+$3+&%
'(-%#2D3+#0-'D%62#0/%357"$%36'(%36"%1"#'D"%$"(-"/$H
D=)B$17+11$"3)*+,"-)23%)450)Z0U01
I6"%!"#"%307+&$%*'/+"-%'#0(.%36"%."("/'3+0($Z
I0+D"3%7'7"/%'(-%#'$X%,"'/+(.%#"#"$%,"/"%2$"-%#0/"%
)5%36"%0D-"/%."("/'3+0($%'(-%D"$$%)5%S"("/'3+0(%T%'(-%[H
@A@A%'(-%@A@;%'$%-+$'$3"/%5"'/%,'$%#0$3D5%36"%307+&%%)5%
S"("/'3+0(%T:%'D&060D%')2$"%)5%S"("/'3+0(%\H
O"/$0('D%65.+"("%#"#"$%,"/"%#0$3D5%2$"-%)5%
S"("/'3+0($%[%'(-%TH
C0($7+/'&5%36"0/5%#"#"$%,"/"%#0$3D5%$"(3%)5%
S"("/'3+0(%\%'(-%$"&0(-%)5%S"("/'3+0(%TH
D=)B$17+11$"3)!"#$%&'()4"6$71
I6+$%$32-5%$6"-$%D+.63%0(%36"%1'&3%36'3%36"%X+(-%01%62#0/%
'77D+"-%+(%#"#"$%+(%$0&+'D%#"-+'%'77$%*'/+"$%'&/0$$%
."("/'3+0($H%
I6"%#0$3%$3/+X+(.%1+(-+(.$%'/"%36'3%U')5%U00#"/$%2$"-%
#0/"%'11+D+'3+*"%62#0/:%S"("/'3+0(%\%'../"$$+*"%62#0/%
'(-%36"%!+DD"(+'D$ '77D+"-%#0$3D5%$"D1G-"1"'3+(.%62#0/H%
I6"%$+D"(3%."("/'3+0(%-+-%(03%'77D5%("+36"/%$"D1G-"1"'3+(.%
(0/%$"D1G"(6'(&+(.%62#0/H
PD$0%36"%C0*+-G;<%307+&$%+(%36"%#"#"$%*'/+"-%$+.(+1+&'(3D5%
'#0(.%36"%."("/'3+0('D%./027$:%"H.H%#'$X%,"'/+(.:%
*'&&+('3+0(%'(-%30+D"3%7'7"/%#"#"$%,"/"%-+$$"#+('3"-%
#0/"%'#0(.%36"%0D-"/%."("/'3+0($H
L=)!"37;+1$"3
S"("/'3+0(%T%2$"-%#0/"%*'/+"-%D+(.2+$3+&%'(-%#2D3+#0-'D%
62#0/%$3/'3".+"$%36'(%36"%0D-"/%."("/'3+0($H
I6+$%6+(3$%30,'/-$%36"+/%6+.6"/%K#2D3+#0-'D%-+.+3'D%
&0#7"3"(&"]%0/%,+-"/%2$"%01%$0&+'D%#"-+'
I6+$%+(%32/(%"F7D'+($%,65%62#0/%+$%(03:%0/%0(D5%7'/3+'DD5%0/%
D"$$%/"$70(-"-%30%)5%#"#)"/$%01%-+11"/"(3%."("/'3+0('D%
./027$%'(-%+(%$0#"%&'$"$%)5%-+11"/"(3%$"F"$H%
L=)!"37;+1$"3
\=)Z0;0740%)S0<0-03701
!"#$%& '(& !) *%"+#),& -(& .#/#)0& 1(& 2+3/34& '(& 15%#6%#/& 7( 8(& 19#):0;<3& .(& ((( =
*5#/>& ?( @ABABC( D#/707%E $#/%F06<3G 7#H%/> $0#/%/> %/ <50 .34%"IJK L#/"0$%E #/"
<50 F9<9;0 3F 63E%#) %/<0;#E<%3/(
M3;H%/> D#L0;6 %/ N;:#/ O#/>9#>0 #/" O%<0;#E%06 /3
APQ
&
APQ
(
!"#$#%& !'& ( )*+,#& !' -./012' 3*$45 #%, #,6+57898%: 8% ;<877+5'!% #==54#>? @54$ 7?+
A+%+5#" ;?+45B 4@ C+5D#" 3*$45 #%, E+7#=5#:$#78>9&E+7#=5#:$#78>9 4@ 3*$45FG*55+%7
5+9+#5>? 75+%,9'
!<<#;"3&R8(&RS0$L0)$#//&R.(RT(&R=R2%R7#%3&R8(R@ABBAC(R8E;%L<R3LL36%<%3/6 #/"R)3>%E#)
$0E5#/%6$6GR73"0)%/>R%/E3/>;9%<%06 #/"R<50%; ;063)9<%3/6(
S9$3;
&
JU
@JC&RQIVW(
X%6E50<<%&RO(R&R.#/#)&RD(R=RX#$:%/%&RY(R@ABAJC(RT9//,R:9<R#40;6%40GR!R)#;>0I6E#)0R69;40,R3FR
<50R0$3<%3/#)R;06L3/60R<3R.34%"IJKR59$3;R%/R<50RZ<#)%#/RL3L9)#<%3/R"9;%/>R<50R
)3EH"3[/(RO%/>9#&RAVKRJBAKWQ&RJB(JBJW\+()%/>9#(ABAB(JBAKWQ(
X#<0$#/&R](&RM%)"F090;&R](&R=RS%%LL#)#&R^(R@ABJPC(
79)<%$3"#)%<,GRT39/"#<%3/6&R;060#;E5R#/"R
#/#),6%6_!RL;3:)0$I3;%0/<0"R%/<;3"9E<%3/
(RM#)<0;R"0R1;9,<0;(
2,/0)&R7(R@ABABC(R.`YZ2IJKR$0$06R>3%/>R4%;#)GR`/R<50R$9)<%L)0R$9)<%$3"#)R43%E06R:05%/"R
F#E0R$#6H6(
2%6E39;60R=R83E%0<,
&RBKUPKAWUABKPBQaU(
2,/0) 7R@ABJVCRZ6/b<R%<R%;3/%EcR20F%/%/>R<50R6E3L0R3FR59$39;396 %;3/,(R
S9$39;
AP@VKCGRWJK_
WQK
2,/0)&R7(&R=RD3LL%&RT(RZ(R@ABJaC(RZ/R<;#>30"%# ;%696GR!/#),6%6R3FR"#;HR59$39; %/RL36<I<0;;3;%6<R
#<<#EHR"%6E39;60(R2%6E39;60R=R.3$$9/%E#<%3/&RJA@VC&RQaA_VBB(R
5<<L6G\\"3%(3;>\JB(JJPP\JPUBVaJQJaPUPPPP
\=)Z0;0740%)S0<0-03701)!"34%=
d9%L0;6 1R@ABBACR70"%#RE9)<9;0R#/"R%/<0;/0<R"%6#6<0;R+3H06GRX%/RO#"0/R#/"R<50R#<<#EHR3/R<50R
M3;)"R^;#"0R.0/<0;(R
'9;3L0#/R]39;/#)R3FR.9)<9;#)R8<9"%06R
U@VCGRVUJ_VPJ(
D#;<%/><3/R!R@ABBWCR
^50RO%/>9%6<%E6R3FRO#9>5<0;GR!R.3;L96I#66%6<0"R8<9",R3FRO#9>5<0;I^#)H
(R
O3/"3/GRe39<)0">0(
]%#/>& T(& O9& 8(& ]%#/>& ^(& ]%#& S( @ABABCG 2306 <50 e0)#<%3/ X0<[00/ S9$3; 8<,)06 #/"
89:+0E<%40 M0))IX0%/> Y#;, !E;366 .9)<9;0 #/" !>0c !70<#I!/#),6%6( Z/
T;3/<%0;6 %/
L6,E53)3>,
JJ&L(AAJQ(
]3/06& e( S(& = -3;;%6& 8( @ABBUC( 2%6E39;60 #6 #E<%3/\"%6E39;60 %/ #E<%3/(
2%6E39;60 %/
#E<%3/G Z/<;3"9E%/> $0"%#<0" "%6E39;60 #/#),6%6
&
Q
&JV(
e3,& !( @ABABC( f^50 D#/"0$%E %6 #D3;<#)b& T%/#/E%#) ^%$06& V !L;%)(
7#;<%/& e( !(& D95)%HI23;%6& D(& O#;60/& 1(& 1;#,& ](& #/" M0%;& d( @ABBQC( Z/"%4%"9#)
"%FF0;0/E06 %/ 9606 3F 59$3; #/" <50%; ;0)#<%3/ <3 L6,E53)3>%E#) [0)):0%/>G "040)3L$0/< 3F
<50 59$3; 6<,)06 g906<%3//#%;0( ]( e06(D0;6(QP&Va_PU("3%GJB(JBJW\8BBKAI
WUWW@BACBBUQVIA
7#<<50[$#/&8(#/" d( S9LL#<h& @ABABC( ! 63E%3)3>, 3F .34%"IJK&Journal of Sociology, ]9/0
ABAB(
P(
\=)Z0;0740%)S0<0-03701)!"34%=
H+I"+J& K' L'& M+5J9& N' O'& ( P8$#%9J8& K' -././2' )+"#784%9?8=9 D+7<++% +6+5B,#B *9+ 4@
?*$45 #%, ,#8"B +Q=+58+%>+'3RES)& 0-#?+#,T4@T=58%72'
C#589& N'& ( L"4$$#+57& K' -./0U2' G4%6868#"87B #%, >4""+>786+9 4% 94>8#" $+,8#FC85#"87B&$+$+9&
#%, %+< 94>8#" 975*>7*5+9'E*"78"8%:*#" E#5:8%9& .-02'
CV9W*+I& G' O#%:*#:+&>5+#78687B #%, ?*$4*5 4%"8%+'O4%,4%F)4*7"+,:+& ./0X'
Y#6g90h&R.(&R=R!6)#/&R'(R@ABAJC(Ri.#<6 :0 39<6%"0&R53[ #:39< $03[jGR$9)<%$3"#)R59$3;
#/"RE;0#<%4%<, %/R#/R%/<0;/0< $0$0(
]39;/#)R3F D;#>$#<%E6
&
JPJ
&RJBJIJJ
M%>>%/6&RX(RABJK(R^50R2%6E9;6%40 D3[0;R3F 70$06 %/R2%>%<#)R.9)<9;0(Re39<)0">0GR-0[R?3;H
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
An earlier review (Schneider et al., 2018) examined the connection between humor styles and mental health. The present article supplements and extends Schneider et al.'s review by surveying a broader concept, subjective well-being (SWB), and investigating the moderating effects of culture and age. To this end, we collected data from 85 studies, with 27,562 participants of varying ages and cultures. Meta-analysis results indicate that affiliative and self-enhancing humor enhances SWB, whereas aggressive and self-defeating humor damages SWB. Culture and age do not moderate the relation between humor styles and SWB. We discuss implications for better understanding of the relationships among culture, age, humor, and SWB.
Article
Full-text available
Advancing the concept of multimodal voicing as a tool for describing user-generated online humour, this paper reports a study on humorous COVID-19 mask memes. The corpus drawn from four popular social media platforms and examined through a multimodal discourse analytic lens. The dominant memetic trends are elucidated and shown to rely programmatically on nested (multimodal) voices, whether compatible or divergent, as is the case with the dissociative echoing of individuals wearing peculiar masks or the dissociative parodic echoing of their collective voice. The theoretical thrust of this analysis is that, as some memes are (re)posted across social media (sometimes going viral), the previous voice(s) – of the meme subject/author/poster – can be re-purposed (e.g. ridiculed) or unwittingly distorted. Overall, this investigation offers new theoretical and methodological implications for the study of memes: it indicates the usefulness of the notions of multimodal voicing, intertextuality and echoing as research apparatus; and it brings to light the epistemological ambiguity in lay and academic understandings of memes, the voices behind which cannot always be categorically known.
Article
Full-text available
This manifesto stems from a transmedia initiative for collective research designed to shape-from the bottom-up-a socially responsive and responsible culture of inquiry, in observing, recording, sharing and reflecting on the changes to communication and interaction caused by the COVID-19 crisis and their enduring effects post-pandemic. The objectives of the manifesto are (a) to identify key changes in communication and interaction practices during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and (b) to offer a blueprint for an innovative methodology involving academics and non-academics in collective research into these and any future changes to the communication landscape across different socio-cultural contexts. The manifesto presents: (1) the factors that make changes in communication and interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic topical for research; (2) the coordinates of these changes; (3) questions that these changes raise; (4) a proposal for a methodology that complements established research methods to understand these changes; and (5) preliminary data on the activities that the research collective PanMeMic has conducted in its first two months of existence.
Article
Full-text available
In this article, we examine dark humour in Internet posts commenting on an online Italian newspaper report published by Il Fatto Quotidiano and devoted to the 2016 terrorist attack in Nice. The analysis focuses on the linguistic forms and socio-pragmatic functions of this dark humour in the wake of the tragedy. We argue that the creative humorous posts are meant to communicate Internet users’ ideologies conceptualised as their true beliefs about the sociopolitical situation and that they are oriented primarily towards criticising terrorism-related themes, notably: inept security enforcement, radical Islam, political and public reactions and integration policies. The humour in the Italian posts is used as a means of displaying Internet users’ wit and attracting other users’ attention.
Book
Full-text available
This textbook provides the first foundational introduction to the practice of analysing multimodality, covering the full breadth of media and situations in which multimodality needs to be a concern. Readers learn via use cases how to approach any multimodal situation and to derive their own specifically tailored sets of methods for conducting and evaluating analyses. Extensive references and critical discussion of existing approaches from many disciplines and in each of the multimodal domains addressed are provided. The authors adopt a problem-oriented perspective throughout, showing how an appropriate foundation for understanding multimodality as a phenomenon can be used to derive strong methodological guidance for analysis as well as supporting the adoption and combination of appropriate theoretical tools. Theoretical positions found in the literature are consequently always related back to the purposes of analysis rather than being promoted as valuable in their own right. By these means the book establishes the necessary theoretical foundations to engage productively with today’s increasingly complex combinations of multimodal artefacts and performances of all kinds.
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, we outline various traditions of thought and explain how Mediated Discourse Analysis borrows insights and analytical tools from many of them. We then move on and illustrate that the framework proposed, however differs from all of the other approaches in a number of important ways: The difference, we argue can perhaps be summed up best by transforming the slogan discourse as action into discourse in action.
Article
Full-text available
The Linguistics of Laughter examines what speakers try to achieve by producing 'laughter-talk' (the talk preceding and eliciting an episode of laughter) and, by using abundant examples from language corpora, what hearers are signalling when they produce laughter. In particular, Alan Partington focuses on the tactical use of laughter-talk to achieve specific rhetorical, and strategic, ends: for example, to construct an identity, to make an argumentative point, to threaten someone else's face or save one's own. Although laughter and humour are by no means always related, the book also considers the implications these corpus-based observations may have about humour theory in general. As one of the first works to have recourse to such a sizeable databank of examples of laughter in spontaneous running talk, this impressive volume is an essential point of reference and an inspiration for scholars with an interest in corpus linguistics, discourse, humour, wordplay, irony and laughter-talk as a social phenomenon. © 2006 Alan Partington.
Article
Full-text available
This paper takes as its bedrock a neo-Gricean definition of the trope of irony, championing two essential conditions for diagnosing its presence: overt untruthfulness (or pretence) arising from flouting the first maxim of Quality, together with evaluative implicature, i.e., implied (negative) evaluation. The paramount aim here is to delineate the boundaries of humorous irony, a term frequently overused both in everyday discourse and in academic research, vis-a-vis a range of distinct humor forms. Arguing in favour of a need for terminological and conceptual rigidity, the author indicates a few types of humor (teasing, absurdity, parody, and sarcasm) and potentially humorous phenomena (bald-faced lying, as well as metaphor, hyperbole and metonymy) which appear to meet at least one of the two conditions and, as a result, tend to be mistakenly labeled as (humorous) irony. The theoretical discussion is illustrated with humorous examples taken from the television series House.
Article
Adding to research on internet memes and humor, this study examines a set of image macros related to a specific viral media event (i.e., “cash me ousside”). This particular meme is linked to a popular catchphrase uttered by a young teenage girl, who appeared on a 2016 episode of the U.S. television talk show, Dr. Phil. We compiled a dataset of 220 image macros related to this media event from three online platforms. Our analysis focuses on various forms of linguistic humor, which most often rely on multimodal interactions between textual and visual elements. Our findings reveal multiple instances of wordplay involving paronymy as well as register-based humor and humor involving the voicing of recognizable figures. In addition, multimodal play often involves semiotic blends of this particular meme with other popular memes. Overall, our study illustrates unique combinations of unexpected elements and semiotic extensions of a non-standard catchphrase with other visual images, thereby establishing incongruity and generating humorous meanings.
Article
We often see an upsurge of humor inspired by tragic circumstances: this happened also during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outbreak. However, little is known about the emotional response to tragedy-triggered humor, let alone Covid-19 humor. With a large-scale survey completed during the early stages of Italy's lockdown, we studied the appreciation (funniness and aversiveness) of different formats of Covid-19 humor shared on social media. Results of an analysis of the role of demographic, personality, and psychological distance factors with linear mixed models showed that Covid-19 humor lacks a ''signature'' of funniness, but displays a mark of aversiveness. Among demographics, age and gender were key factors: with increasing age and in women, Covid-19 humor was judged as more aversive. Individuals using humor to cope with uneasy circumstances judged Covid-19 humor as funnier and less aversive. Furthermore, the perceived risk of infection amplified Covid-19 humor aversiveness, while kilometrical distance from the first Italian contagion hotspot raised the amusement in global terms. These findings expand our knowledge about dark humor and should raise awareness of the great variation in the emotional impact of Covid-19 humor and of the need to ponder where and with whom to share the laugh about the pandemic.