ArticlePDF Available

A new genus and species of anophthalmous Otiorhynchini from Greece, with a new synonymy and new combinations (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A new genus of Entiminae, an endogean weevil of the tribe Otiorhynchini, Giavarhynchus Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier, gen. n., and its type species Giavarhynchus amicorum Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier, sp. n. are described. The new taxon is readily distinguished from all other members of the tribe due to the unique combination of lack of eyes, elongate rostrum with a ventral transverse furrow and excised lateral margins located at apical third, punctation of pronotum of two distinct sizes arranged in a distinctive pattern, interval 7 of elytra protruding from base of pronotum and crenulate basally, metafemora bearing a spine-like tooth much larger than that of pro-and mesofemora, female tibiae granulate on inner margin, bisinuous mesotibiae. The following synonymy is proposed: Nematocerus Reiche, 1849 (= Cyrtozemia Pascoe, 1872, syn. n.; = Holcorhinosoma Voss, 1939, syn. n.). New combinations are: Nematocerus cognatus (Marshall, 1916), comb. n.; Nematocerus dispar (Pascoe, 1872), comb. n.; Nematocerus pilipes (Morimoto, 2015), comb. n., all from Cyrtozemia; Nematocerus subtuberculatus (Voss, 1939), comb. n. from Holcorhinosoma. New tribal placement is: Pseudocratopus Hustache,
Content may be subject to copyright.
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)
Accepted by R. Anderson: 9 Feb. 2021; published: 25 Feb. 2021 69
Zootaxa 4938 (1): 069–084
https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/
Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4938.1.3
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F8F8E25-2418-4D07-B4C3-671AFED4A50F
A new genus and species of anophthalmous Otiorhynchini from Greece, with a
new synonymy and new combinations (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Entiminae)
CESARE BELLO’1, ENZO COLONNELLI2, LEONARDO FORBICIONI3, GIUSEPPE OSELLA1,4 &
ENRICO RUZZIER1,5*
1World Biodiversity Association Onlus c/o Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Lungadige Porta Vittoria, 9, 37129 Verona, Italy.
cesarebello@ortoveneto.it; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-8043
2Via delle Giunchiglie n. 56, 00172 Roma, Italy.
ecolonnelli@yahoo.it; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-6591
3World Biodiversity Association Onlus c/o NAT LAB Forte Inglese, 57037 Portoferraio, Livorno, Italy.
arcipelago.toscano@biodiversityassociation.org; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-6756
4Via XXIV Maggio, 20, 37126 Verona, Italy.
research@biodiversityassociation.org; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-7857
5Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, viale
dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy.
enrico.ruzzier@unipd.it; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-1247
*Corresponding author
Abstract
A new genus of Entiminae, an endogean weevil of the tribe Otiorhynchini, Giavarhynchus Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier,
gen. n., and its type species Giavarhynchus amicorum Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier, sp. n. are described. The new taxon
is readily distinguished from all other members of the tribe due to the unique combination of lack of eyes, elongate
rostrum with a ventral transverse furrow and excised lateral margins located at apical third, punctation of pronotum of
two distinct sizes arranged in a distinctive pattern, interval 7 of elytra protruding from base of pronotum and crenulate
basally, metafemora bearing a spine-like tooth much larger than that of pro- and mesofemora, female tibiae granulate on
inner margin, bisinuous mesotibiae. The following synonymy is proposed: Nematocerus Reiche, 1849 (= Cyrtozemia
Pascoe, 1872, syn. n.; = Holcorhinosoma Voss, 1939, syn. n.). New combinations are: Nematocerus cognatus (Marshall,
1916), comb. n.; Nematocerus dispar (Pascoe, 1872), comb. n.; Nematocerus pilipes (Morimoto, 2015), comb. n., all
from Cyrtozemia; Nematocerus subtuberculatus (Voss, 1939), comb. n. from Holcorhinosoma. New tribal placement
is: Pseudocratopus Hustache, 1921 from Otiorhynchini to Peritelini. New subgeneric placement is that of Otiorhynchus
deceptorius Białooki, Germann & Pelletier, 2017 and of Otiorhynchus incisirostris Białooki, Germann & Pelletier, 2017
from Otiorhynchus (Lixorrhynchus) Reitter, 1914 to Otiorhynchus (Aranihus) Reitter, 1912.
Key words: Entiminae, Otiorhynchini, taxonomy, new genus, new species, new synonymy, new combinations, Greece
Introduction
Despite the common belief that Europe is among the most thoroughly studied areas of the world, it remains an im-
portant reservoir of unknown species (Fontaine et al. 2012; Oberprieler et al. 2007), particularly underexplored and
species-rich countries such as Greece with more than 1600 recorded weevil species (Germann et al. 2021) so far.
Since 1991, Pier Mauro Giachino and Dante Vailati have been investigating subterranean Coleoptera inhabiting the
superficial subterranean habitat (Giachino & Vailati 2010) of this country, resulting in the description of new species
and the discovery of several still undescribed taxa (Giachino &Vailati 2010). The aim of this paper is to describe
an edaphic weevil collected during those surveys, which presents a new and unique combination of morphological
characters.
BELLO’ ET AL.
70 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
Material and methods
Collecting methods. Both specimens dealt with in this paper were collected using endogean pitfall traps, following
the methodology described and illustrated by Giachino & Vailati (2010).
The material used in this study was examined with an Olympus SZH10 microscope. Female terminalia were
dissected and cleared from musculature in household bleach. The last two abdominal sternites, plus sternite VIII,
spermatheca and gonocoxites of females were dissected and mounted in DMHF (dimethyl hydantoin formaldehyde
resin). Studio photographs were taken by Francesco Sacco with a Nikon D90 digital camera provided with an ob-
jective AF Micro-Nikkor 60 mm and processed using Helicon Focus 5.3 and Photoshop CS4 Extended software.
Pier Mauro Giachino and Dante Vailati took habitat pictures. All measurements are in dorsal view along an ideal
identical plane.
Descriptive format. The morphological terminology used in the paper follows Osella & Bellò (2010); Lyal
(2013); Oberprieler et al. (2014) and Bellò et al. (2019). Label data is quoted verbatim, different labels are sepa-
rated by a slash, remarks and comments are given in square brackets. The sex is noted, and the depository of the
specimens is given. Label acronyms are as follows: [g, p] = [green, printed], [r, p] = [red, printed], [w, p] = [white,
printed], [y, p] = [yellow, printed].
Acronyms of the type depositories are: CBPC= Cesare Bellò private collection, Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso,
Italy; GOPC = Giuseppe Osella private collection, Verona, Italy, which will be deposited in the Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale, Verona, Italy.
Acronyms for measurements and ratios are the same as in Bellò et al. (2019: 11, Figure 1A), in alphabetical
order: BL = Length of pronotum + elytra; EL = Maximum length of elytra; EL/EW = Maximum length of elytra
/ maximum width of elytra; EW = Maximum width of elytra; FL = Length of funicle; FW/MW =Width of frons /
maximum width of mesorostrum; PL = Maximum length of pronotum; PL/PW= Maximum length of pronotum /
maximum width of pronotum; PW = Maximum width of pronotum; RL = Maximum length of rostrum; RL/RW =
Length of rostrum / width of rostrum; RW = Maximum width of rostrum; SL = Length of scape; SL/FL = Length of
scape / length of funicle; TL = Total body length (from the apex of the rostrum to the apex of the elytra).
The results of this paper (in part) arise from the program “Research Missions in the Mediterranean Basin” spon-
sored by the World Biodiversity Association Onlus. This is contribution XLV.
Taxonomy
All characters of the new taxon described here place it in the subfamily Entiminae Schoenherr, 1823. Because of the
present rather chaotic status of taxonomy in Entiminae, and the lack of comprehensive phylogenetic analyses, it is
necessary to rely on their morphology for tribal placement. Despite several partial improvements (Alonso-Zarazaga
& Lyal 1999; Champion 1911; Desbrochers 1873, 1898; Emden 1936; Heller 1925; Hoffmann 1965; Horne 1876;
Kuschel 1954, 1956; LeConte 1874; Marseul 1863; Marshall 1916, 1942, 1956; Meregalli et al. 2021; Morimoto &
Kojima 2001; Morrone 1998; Pierce 1913; Reitter 1913; Sharp 1891, 1919), the general scheme of most of the tribes
is still more or less the one proposed by Lacordaire (1863). According to the above cited articles and keys, the new
genus Giavarhynchus clearly belongs to Otiorhynchini Schoenherr, 1826, where it is very close to the paraphyletic
genus Otiorhynchus Germar, 1822. The tribe Otiorhynchini itself appears today to be paraphyletic, since, besides
the extant Palaearctic genera, all of which are from close to its flightless type genus Otiorhynchus, Alonso-Zarazaga
& Lyal (1999), Alonso-Zarazaga et al. (2017) and Colonnelli (2014) included African, Nearctic, Oriental and New
Zealand genera (Agronus Horn, 1976, Calyptops Schoenherr, 1840, Catergus Schoenherr, 1842, Epitimetes Pascoe,
1877, Homodus Broun, 1881, Hygrocus Broun, 1881, Lepydnus Champion, 1914, Parvorhynchus Colonnelli, 2014,
Phaeocharis Broun, 1916, Pseudocratopus Hustache, 1921, Sciobius Schoenherr, 1823, Sciopithes Horn, 1876)
whose only common characters are the scrobes completely visible from above and the free claws. Judging from
their descriptions and from the material at hand, all these taxa are distantly related to each other, and are very dif-
ferent from the new genus described here. To find the right place for them within the rather confused taxonomy of
Entiminae is well beyond the scope of this paper. It is nonetheless worth pointing out that the genus Cyrtozemia
Pascoe, 1872 was wrongly placed by Alonso-Zarazaga et al. (2017) among Otiorhynchini, since its type species C.
dispar Pascoe, 1872 has connate claws (Pascoe 1872; Marshall 1916) which place this genus among the Peritelini
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 71
Lacordaire, 1863 (new placement) in its present more than broad sense. In addition, Cyrtozemia, according to its
description and the accompanying figures (Pascoe 1872; Marshall, 1916) cannot be considered different from the
African and southern Palaearctic genus Nematocerus Reiche, 1849. Consequently, it is necessary to establish the
following synonymy: Nematocerus Reiche, 1849 (= Cyrtozemia Pascoe, 1872, syn. n.; = Holcorhinosoma Voss,
1939, syn. n.). This implies the following new combinations: Nematocerus cognatus (Marshall, 1916), comb. n.;
Nematocerus dispar (Pascoe, 1872), comb. n.; Nematocerus pilipes (Morimoto, 2015), comb. n., all from Cyr-
tozemia; Nematocerus subtuberculatus (Voss, 1939), comb. n. from Holcorhinosoma. Furthermore, the genus Pseu-
docratopus, of which Hustache (1921) said nothing about the state of tarsal claws, appears from the figures of both
its species (Hustache 1921) so similar to other African Peritelini as to be moved among them (new placement)
awaiting the possibility of physically studying the types. The following are also noteworthy: the synonymy of Mei-
ranella Reitter, 1913 with Otiorhynchus (Namertanus) Reitter, 1912 (Davidian & Savitsky 2006), the synonymy
of Rhynchotious Magnano, 1998 with Otiorhynchus (Aranihus) Reitter, 1912 (Germann 2013), the synonymy of
Omoiotus Sharp, 1896 with Asphalmus Sharp, 1896 and its transfer to Omiini Shuckard, 1840 (Borovec 2010), the
synonymy of Kocheriana Hoffmann, 1953, mislabelled as Moroccan, with the Madagascan Neseremnus Marshall,
1921 in Tanyrhynchini Schoenherr, 1826 (Alonso-Zarazaga 2008), and the movement of Solariola Flach, 1908 to
Peritelini (Baviera 2015).
Results
Giavarhynchus Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier gen. n.
(Figs 1a-1n)
Type species. Giavarhynchus amicorum Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier sp. n.
Diagnosis. Blind, large-sized (7.3-8.0 mm) Otiorhynchini easily distinguishable from all other genera by the follow-
ing combination of characters: elongate rostrum with a ventral transverse furrow and excised lateral margins located
at apical third (Figs 1d-1e), punctation of pronotum of two distinct sizes arranged in a distinctive pattern (figs. 1a,
1b, 2a, 2c, 2f), interval 7 of elytra crenulate in basal eighth (figs 1a, 1g, 2a); by metafemora bearing a spine-like
tooth placed at apex of distal third and much larger than that of pro- and mesofemora (Fig. 1a, 2a); tibiae of female
granulate on inner margin, granules particularly strong on the bisinuous mesotibiae (figs 1a, 1c, 1f); and tarsi thin
and elongate, segment 3 only slightly wider than the preceding two (figs 1a, 1c).
Description. Body elongate (TL: 7.30–8.00 mm; BL: 5.60–6.60 mm), colour brownish-black, dull or weakly
glossy, antennae and legs paler.
Head globular and smooth. Rostrum elongate (RL: 1.30–1.60 mm, RW: 0.50–0.60 mm, RL/RW: 2.60–2.67),
regularly curved from base to apex. Scrobes deep, completely visible in dorsal view. Pterygia evident. Rostrum ven-
trally in apical third with deep transverse furrow. Apex of rostrum with sparse raised short setae. Upper surface of
mesorostrum with setae on both sides, carinae sub-parallel to the lateral margin. Epistome absent. Genae elongate,
scarcely punctured. Mandibles in horizontal plane, with scar indicating point of attachment of deciduous cusps; man-
dibular scars present. Eyes absent. Forehead (FW / MW: ratio 1.50–1.60) in lateral view slightly convex, intraocular
pit not visible. Submentum without pappolepida.
Antennae long and thin (SL: 1.30–1.40 mm, FL: 2.00–2.10 mm, SL/FL: 0.65–0.67). Scape about 4-5 times
as long as wide, straight, with widened and curved apex. Funicle with 7 antennomeres, all with fine setae. Rela-
tive length of antennomeres 1-7 of funicle, in millimetres: 0.32–0.34, 0.30–0.32, 0.18–0.20, 0.18–0.20, 0.12–0.15,
0.16–0.18, 0.16–0.18; length of antennal club: 0.58–0.60. Club fusiform, as long as the last four funicular anten-
nomeres, almost 3 times as wide as the funicle, basal antennomere of club elongate and glabrous, the remaining two
with golden pubescence and some thin, long setae.
Pronotum longer than wide (PL: 1.80–1.90 mm, PW: 1.70–1.80 mm, PL/PW: 1.05–1.06) with strongly rounded
margins, widest at middle, anterior and posterior margins straight, the anterior one much narrower than the posterior
margin. Disc with irregularly placed large and fine punctures bearing long erect setae; punctures more distant from
each other than on sides; interspaces between punctures often shiny and microreticulate.
Elytra dorsally almost glabrous, slightly shining, in dorsal view oval-elongate, in lateral view slightly vaulted
BELLO’ ET AL.
72 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
(EL: 4.40–4.80 mm, EW: 2.60–2.80 mm, EL/EW: 1.70–1.72). Elytra slightly convex, widest at middle of moderate-
ly rounded sides, not fused but suture ill defined. Humeri protruding, angular and toothed (Fig. 1g). Wings absent.
Each elytron with nine complete striae; seventh stria raised and prominent particularly at humeri. Interstriae convex,
with 10 to 20 punctures and with sparse thin setae. Elytral declivity from 60 to 75 degrees.
Legs long, slender, with long setae, and more or less large tooth on each femur. All femora clubbed at middle,
tooth of metafemur very large and with four to five small tooth-like tubercles. All tibiae mucronate, with fringe of
thick golden setae on inner apical angle, protibia with distinct inner apical grooming brush, tarsomere 1 elongate,
conical, 2 short and transverse, 3 deeply bilobed; all tarsomeres with thin golden setae. Onychium curved, thin and
elongate. All coxae globular, procoxae almost connate, mesocoxae separated by a space almost equal to the diameter
of a mesocoxa, metacoxae separated by a space about three times their diameter.
Abdomen shiny, slightly rugose, finely punctured; each puncture bearing a short seta.
Male terminalia. Unknown.
Female terminalia. Female genitalia as in figs: (1i) spermatheca; (1l) VIII sternite; (1m) III- VII sternites; (1n)
gonocoxites. Gonocoxite small, rather slender, weakly sclerotized, evenly tapered apicad, stylus elongate, with tuft
of 4–6 setae at apex. Sternite VIII with long, straight and slender apodeme terminating just at base of plate, creating
a short basal margin. Plate of sternite VIII trapezoid and with longitudinally developed arms, apical margin well-
defined, armed with fringe of setae. Spermatheca sclerotized, small, slender, cornu slender, corpus small, ramus
slightly longer than wide, nodulus smaller, hump-shaped.
Etymology. The new genus is named after our friends and colleagues Pier Mauro Giachino and Dante Vailati
(World Biodiversity Association, Verona, Italy), collectors of the type material. The name is a combination of their
surnames initial Gia[chino]Va[ilati] and [Otio]rhynchus, a supposedly closely related weevil genus, resulting thus
in Giavarhynchus. Gender masculine.
Remarks. The lack of or extreme reduction of eyes is not such an uncommon feature among the soil-dwell-
ing Entiminae. Morrone & Hlaváč (2017) listed all world taxa of such entimines presently known, which occur in
seven tribes: Celeuthetini Lacordaire, 1863 (genera Genavius Osella, 1983 from New Caledonia and Guineobius
Osella, 1983 from New Guinea), Laparocerini Lacordaire, 1863 (some species of Laparocerus Schoenherr, 1834
from the Canary Islands and Madeira), Pachyrhynchini Schoenherr, 1826 (genus Schauenbergia Osella, 1977 from
Réunion), Peritelini Lacordaire, 1863 (genera Hobarypeithes Hustache, 1939 and some species of Dysommatus
Marshall, 1933, both from Africa, plus Solariola Flach, 1908, and Troglorhythmus Alziar & Lemaire, 2008 both
from Europe); Sciaphilini Sharp, 1891 (genus Abarypeithes Hustache, 1939 from Africa), Typhlorhinini Kuschel,
1954 (genera Cambefortinus Richard, 1986, Cephalorostris Richard, 1979, Hopactorrhynchus Richard, 1953 and
Scrobops Richard, 1979 from Madagascar and West Africa), and Otiorhynchini (five taxa from the Palaearctic).
Among these last, although one or another of the features of Giavarhynchus, including lack of eyes, can be found
in some Mediterranean otiorhynchines, the presence of all of the characters detailed in the diagnosis is unique to
the genus described here. Firstly, the unusual deep rostral constriction is shared with both the Moroccan species
Otiorhynchus deceptorius Białooki, Germann & Pelletier, 2017 and Otiorhynchus incisirostris Białooki, Germann
& Pelletier, 2017 which were incidentally wrongly placed (Białooki et al. 2015) in the subgenus Lixorrhynchus
Reitter, 1914 rather than in Aranihus Reitter, 1912 to which they evidently belong because (new subgeneric place-
ment). Secondly, the ventral rostral furrow is also present in the Cretan genus Mirorhynchus Magnano, 2003. All the
above cited taxa clearly have a shorter rostrum, well developed eyes and edentate (or almost so) femora and cannot
be confused with Giavarhynchus. In particular, whereas both Otiorhynchus (Aranihus) deceptorius and Otiorhyn-
chus (Aranihus) incisirostris appear also to be very different from Giavarhynchus amicorum on the basis of their
very weakly granulate tibiae, lacking humeral tubercles, and granulate pronotum, Mirorhynchus bellus Magnano,
2003 from Crete (not from Cyprus as wrongly reported in the title of its description (Magnano 2003)), has a similar
or even stronger tibial denticulation compared to that of G. amicorum, but on the inner margin of the protibiae in-
stead of on the meso- and metatibiae. It is however immediately distinguishable by the squamiform-like punctation
of pronotum, lack of humeral tubercles and oval shape (Germann et al. 2021). The loss of eyes is a morphological
convergence of Giavarhynchus with Baldorhynchus Di Marco & Osella, 2002, Ioniorhynchus Magrini, Meoli &
Abbazzi, 2005, and with some Otiorhynchus of the subgenera Aranihus Reitter 1912, Cavernodes Białooki 2015,
Italorrhynchus Magrini, 2019, Lixorrhynchus Reitter, 1914 and Troglorhynchus F. Schmidt, 1854.
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 73
FIGURES 1a–1c. Giavarhynchus gen. n., habitus: 1a—dorsal view of the female holotype; 1b—ventral view of the female
paratype; 1c—lateral view of the holotype. Scale bar: 1 mm. TL of the holotype: 8.00 mm; TL of the paratype: 7.30 mm. Pho-
tograph courtesy of Francesco Sacco.
BELLO’ ET AL.
74 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURES 1d–1n. Giavarhynchus gen. n., details: 1d—rostrum: dorsal and lateral view; 1e—hollowed rostrum: ventral and
lateral view; 1f—metafemora with large spur; 1g—prominent humeri; 1g—elytra without scales; 1i—spermatheca; 1l—sternite
VIII; 1m—sternites III-VII; 1n—gonocoxites. Photograph courtesy of Francesco Sacco.
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 75
Giavarhynchus is one of the nine genera or subgenera of micro-or anophthalmic subterranean weevils occur-
ring in Greece (Morrone & Hlaváč 2017). Two of these are apparently endemic to this country, namely Hauseriola
Osella, 1980 and Giavarhynchus, whereas the remaining six are not, namely Absoloniella Formánek, 1913, Amau-
rorhinus Fairmaire, 1860, Ioniorhynchus Magrini, Meoli & Abbazzi, 2005, Otiorhynchus Germar, 1822, Styphlo-
deres Wollaston, 1873 and Ubychia Rost, 1893. Giavarhynchus is surely one of the most peculiar entimine genera
due to its unique morphology, also being somewhat similar, although distantly related, to Solariola Flach, 1908 and
Troglorhythmus Alziar & Lemaire, 2008, genera which include much smaller species and which are both presently
placed in Peritelini (Bellò et al. 2019).
The presence of a marked cuticular sculpture, tuberculate elytral humeri and strongly punctured elytral striae
suggest a perhaps recent adaptation of Giavarhynchus to life in the superficial subterranean habitat. As in most en-
dogean Otiorhynchini both elytra and elytral humeri are smooth.
Giavarhynchus amicorum Bellò, Osella & Ruzzier sp. n.
(Figures 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f)
Type series. Holotype. Female with labels: [genitalia in DHMF] [transparent card] / ♀ [w, p] / Grecia, nom.[os]
Thesprotía, O.[ros] Paramithlăs [Paramythyás], Agia Mavra, 620m, N 39°30’06.8” E 20°30’06.3”, 23.VI.2014-
20.IX.2015, Giachino &Vailati leg. [w, p] / Collezione Cesare Bellò, Castelfranco Veneto [g, p] / Giavarhynchus
amicorum Holotype det. Bellò & Osella, 2020 [r, p] / esemplare fotografato by Francesco Sacco [y, p] (GOPC).
Paratype. Female with labels: [genitalia in DHMF] [transparent card] / ♀ [w, p] / Grecia, nom. [ros] Thesprotía,
O. [ros] Paramithlăs [Paramythyás], Agia Mavra, 620m, N 39°30’06.8” E 20°30’06.3”, 23.VI.2014-20.IX.2015,
Giachino & Vailati leg. [w, p] / Collezione Cesare Bellò, Castelfranco Veneto [g, p] / Giavarhynchus amicorum
Paratype det. Bellò & Osella, 2020 [r, p] / esemplare fotografato by Francesco Sacco [y, p] (CBPC).
Holotype. Body elongate, size: 8.00 mm (TL), 6.60 mm (BL). Integument blackish-brownish, dull or weakly
glossy, with antennae and tarsi lighter, only with sparse setae on head and slightly longer setae on pronotum and
elytra.
Rostrum elongate (RL: 1.60 mm, RW: 0.60 mm, RL/RW: 2.67). Forehead (FW / MW: ratio 1.60) slightly convex
in lateral view.
Antennae quite elongate (SL: 1.40 mm, FL: 2.10 mm, SL/FL: 0.67). Funicle 7-segmented, all segments with
very thin and elongate setae, their relative lengths are: 0,34 mm, 0.32 mm, 0.20 mm, 0.20 mm, 0.15 mm, 0.18 mm,
0.18 mm, the club is 0.60 mm.
Pronotum longer than wide (PL: 1.90 mm, PW: 1.80 mm, PL/PW: 1.06).
Elytra elongate-oval (EL: 4.80 mm, EW: 2.80 mm, EL/EW: 1.72). Elytral declivity inclined at about 60 degrees
down the dorsal plane of elytra.
Paratype. The paratype is similar to the holotype but differs in size (TL: 7.30 mm, BL: 5.60 mm, RL: 1.30 mm,
RW: 0.50 mm, RL/RW: 2.60; SL: 1.30 mm, FL: 2.00 mm, SL/FL: 0.65; PL: 1.80 mm, PW: 1.70 mm, PL/PW: 1.05,
EL: 4.40 mm, EW: 2.60 mm, EL/EW: 1.70).
Etymology. Amicorum is the genitive plural of the Latin word “amicus” (= friend). The authors are pleased to
name this species for their friendship with Pier Mauro Giachino and Dante Vailati, collectors of the type series (Fig.
3b).
Reproduction. Since only two females are known it is impossible to say whether the species is bisexual or
parthenogenetic like several other Palaearctic otiorhynchines.
Collecting conditions. Both specimens of G. amicorum were collected using endogean pitfall traps placed in
a calcareous environment covered by degraded Mediterranean shrub on the SSW slope of Mount Paramythyás, at
620 meters of elevation. The traps were set on 23rd June 2014 and recovered on 20th September 2015. It is plausible
that the new species has a biology similar to those of other endogean weevils, which have rhizophagous adults and
larvae developing inside roots, not necessarily in the deepest part of the soil.
Distribution. Giavarhynchus amicorum is known only for the type locality (Figs 3a, 4b).
BELLO’ ET AL.
76 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 2a. Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n. female holotype, habitus in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm. Photograph courtesy
of Francesco Sacco.
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 77
FIGURES 2b–2e. Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n. female holotype: 2b—habitus in lateral view; 2c—rostrum in lateral view;
2d—base of the elytra; 2e—elytral declivity. Scale bar: 1 mm. Photograph courtesy of Francesco Sacco.
BELLO’ ET AL.
78 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 2f. Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n. female holotype: 2g—details of rostrum, pronotum, funicle and club. Photograph
courtesy of Francesco Sacco.
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 79
FIGURES 3a–3b. 3a—Type locality of Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n. Photograph courtesy of Dante Vailati; 3b—Dante
Vailati (to the right) and Piermauro Giachino (to the left) in the field in Greece.
BELLO’ ET AL.
80 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURES 4a–4b. Distribution of Giavarhynchus gen. n.—4a—Distribution in Europe; 4b—Detail of distribution in Greece.
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 81
FIGURES 5a–5d. Comparison of Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n. with Mirorhynchus bellus Magnano (2003) from Crete.
5a—female holotype of Giavarhynchus amicorum sp. n., habitus; 5b—Mirorhynchus bellus Magnano (2003) from Crete, habi-
tus; 5c—rostrum in lateral view of Giavarhynchus amicorum sp n.; 5d—the same of Mirorhynchus bellus Magnano (2003) from
Crete. Photographs 5a and 5c courtesy of Francesco Sacco; Photographs 5b and 5d from Germann et al. (2021).
BELLO’ ET AL.
82 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
Acknowledgments
We thank Pier Mauro Giachino and Dante Vailati (World Biodiversity Association, Verona, Italy) for their coopera-
tion, providing information, and their generous donation of the material on which this paper is based. In addition,
we thank Cosimo Baviera (University of Animal Biology and Marine Ecology, Messina, Italy), Roman Borovec
(University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic), Luciano Diotti (Cinisello Balsamo, Milan, Italy), Luca
Fancello (Cagliari, Italy), Christoph Germann (Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel, Switzerland), Peter Hlaváč (Na-
tional Museum of Natural History, Prague, Czech Republic), Paolo Magrini (Florence, Italy), Michele Tedeschi
(Milan, Italy), Igor Souza-Gonçalves (Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil), Jared Bernard (University
of Hawai’i-Manoa, Honolulu, USA) and Max Barclay ( The Natural History Museum, London, UK) for providing
helpful support during the preparation of the manuscript. Furthermore, we thank Margherita Atorino and Pietro
Berton (Preganziol, Italy) for helping us to produce tables of photographs, and Francesco Sacco (Rome, Italy) for
photographing the types. Finally, we are grateful to three anonymous referees, and to the editor Robert Anderson
(Canadian Museum of Nature, Canada) for helpful comments on and criticism of this manuscript, and for stylistic
improvements.
References
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A. (2008) Notes on enigmatic weevil taxa described from Spain and Morocco (Coleoptera, Curculionidae).
Zootaxa, 1806 (1), 66–68.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1806.1.5
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A., Barrios, H., Borovec, R., Bouchard, P., Caldara, R., Colonnelli, E., Gültekin, L., Hlaváč, P., Korotyaev,
B., Lyal, C.H.C., Machado, A., Meregalli, M., Pierotti, H., Ren, L., Sánchez-Ruiz, M., Sforzi, A., Silfverberg, H., Skuhr-
ovec, J., Trýzna, M., Velázquez de Castro, A.J. & Yunakov, N.N. (2017) Cooperative catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera
Curculionoidea. Monografías electrónicas de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 8, 1–729.
Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A. & Lyal, C.H.C. (1999) A world catalogue of families and genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleop-
tera) (Excepting Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Entomopraxis, Barcelona, 315 pp.
Baviera, C. (2015) A review of the genus Solariola Flach, 1908 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae, Peritelini). Zootaxa,
3920 (3), 401–430.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.3.1
Bellò, C., Osella, G. & Baviera, C. (2019) A taxonomic monograph of the genus Solariola Flach, 1908 (Coleoptera: Curculioni-
dae: Entiminae). Zootaxa, 4676 (1), 1–261.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4676.1.1
Białooki, P.Z., Germann, C. & Pelletier, J. (2015) Two new species of Otiorhynchus Germar, 1822 subgenus Lixorrhynchus
Reitter, 1914 from Morocco (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Otiorhynchini). Polish Journal of Entomology, 84, 61–72.
https://doi.org/10.1515/pjen-2015-0006
Borovec, R. (2010) A taxonomic study of Eastern Palaearctic Omiini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae). Acta Entomo-
logica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 50 (2), 577–594.
Champion, G.C. (1911) Series Otiorhynchinae Alatae & Supplement to the Thecesterninae and Otiorhynchinae. In: Sharp, D. &
Champion, G.C. (1889–1911), Biologia Centrali Americana. Insecta. Coleoptera. Vol. IV. Part 3. Rhynchophora. Curcu-
lionidae. Attelabinae, Pterocolinae, Allocoryninae, Apioninae, Thecesterninae, Otiorhynchinae. Published for the editors
by R. H. Porter, London, pp. 178–317 & pp. 317–344.
Colonnelli, E. (2014) Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae and Curculionidae except Scolytinae (Coleoptera) from Socotra
Island. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 54 (Supplementum), 295–422.
Davidian, G.E. & Savitsky, V. Yu. (2006) Obzor zhukov-dolgonosikov podrodov Namertanus Reitter i Troglonamertanus sub-
gen. nov. roda Otiorhynchus Germar (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) fauny Kavkaza. Trudy Russkogo entomologicheskogo
obshchestva, 77, 48–84.
Desbrochers des Loges, J. (1873) Notes synonymiques.—Remarques diverses.—Description de coléoptères nouveax. Annales
de la Société entomologique de France, Series 5, 2 (4), 420–432. [1872]
Desbrochers des Loges, J. (1898) Monographie des curculionides appartenant au groupe des Holcorhinidae. Le Frelon, 6 (7/8),
1–20. [1897/1898]
Emden, F. [I.] van. (1936) Die Anordnung der Brachyderinae Gattungen im Coleopterorum Catalogus. (Mit 4 Abbildungen.).
Stettiner entomologische Zeitung, 97 (1), 66–99.
Fontaine, B., van Achterberg, K., Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A., Araujo, R., Asche, M., Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U., Audisio, P., Aukema,
B., Bailly, N., Balsamo, M., Bank, R. A., Belfiore, C., Bogdanowicz, W., Boxshall, G., Burckhardt, S., Chylarecki, P., De-
harveng, L., Dubois, A., Enghoff, H., Fochetti, R., Fontaine, C., Gargominy, O., Lopez, M.S.G., Goujet, S., Harvey, M.S.,
Heller, K.G., van Helsdingen, P., Hoch, H., De Jong, Y., Karsholt, O., Los, W., Magowski, W., Massard, J.A., McInnes, S.J.,
A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF ANOPHTHALMOUS OTIORHYNCHINI Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press · 83
Mendes, L.F., Mey, E., Michelsen, V., Minelli, A., Nafria, Juan M.N., van Nieukerken, E., Pape, T., De Prins, W., Ramos,
M., Ricci, C., Roselaar, C., Rota, E., Segers, H., Timm, T., van Tol, J. & Bouchet, P. (2012) New Species in the Old World:
Europe as a Frontier in Biodiversity Exploration, a Test Bed for 21st Century Taxonomy. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e36881.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036881
Germann, C. (2013) Rhynchotious Magnano, 1998 syn. n. of Aranihus Reitter, 1912 and redescription of Otiorhynchus (Arani-
hus) squamipes Reitter, 1913 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 60 (1), 73–77.
Germann, C., Bialooki, P. & Pelletier, J. (2017) A replacement name in Otiorhynchus (Germar, 1822) (Coleoptera, Curculioni-
dae). Arquivos Entomolóxicos, 18, 265–266.
Germann, C., Bahr, F., Braunert, C. & Link, A. (2021) The weevils of Greece. Catalogue of the Curculionoidea of Greece (Cole-
optera). Le charançon, Catalogues & Keys No. 3. Curculio-Institute, Moenchengladbach. Available from: http://curci.site.
at/ (accessed 20 January 2021)
Giachino, P.M. &Vailati, S. (2010) The Subterranean Enviroment. Hypogean life, concepts and collecting techniques. WBA
Handbooks 3. World Biodiversity Association, Verona, 132 pp.
Heller, K.M. (1925) 4. Bestimmungsschlüssel außeuropäischer Käfer. Curculionidae, Tribus n.: Ottistirini. (Mit Tafel 1.). Wie-
ner Entomologische Zeitung, 42 (4/10), 55–91, 1 pl.
Hoffmann, A. (1965) Contribution à la faune du Congo (Brazzaville). Mission A. Villiers et A. Descarpentries. XIV coléoptères
curculionidés. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Afrique Noire, 27 (4), 1398–1433.
Horn, G.H. (1876) [new taxa]. In: LeConte, J.L. & Horn, G.H., The Rhynchophora of America north of Mexico. Proceedings of
the American Philosophical Society, 15 (96), pp. 1–455.
Hustache, A. (1919) Synopsis des curculionides de la faune malgache. I. Brachydérides et otiorrhynchides. Annales de la Société
entomologique de France, 87, 441–520. [1918]
Hustache, A. (1921) Curculionides des Iles Mascareignes. Annales de la Société entomologique de France, 89 (2), 113–203.
[1920]
Kuschel, G. (1954) Un gorgojo ciego de Otiorhynchinae de Madagascar (Aporte 14 de Col. Curculionoïdea). Revue française
d’Entomologie, 21 (4), 286–289.
Kuschel, G. (1956) Revisión de los Premnotrypini y adiciones a los Bagoini (Aporte 17 sobre Coleoptera Curculionoidea).
Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, 26, 187–235.
Lacordaire, T. (1863) Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coléoptères ou exposé méthodique de tous les genres proposés
jusqu’ici dans cet ordre d’insectes. Tome sixième contenant la famille des curculionides. Roret, Paris, 637 pp.
LeConte, J.L. (1874) The classification of the rhynchophorous Coleoptera. American Naturalist, 8 (8), 452–470.
https://doi.org/10.1086/271360
Magnano, L. (2003) Un nuovo genere e una nuova specie di Cipro appartenenti alla tribù Otiorhynchini (Coleoptera: Curculioni-
dae). 7 photographies and 4 drawings. Snudebiller, 4, 228–230.
Marseul, S.A. de (1863) Catalogue des coléoptères d’Europe et du bassin de la Méditerranée en Afrique et en Asie. Deuxième
Édition. Deyrolle, Paris, 300 pp.
Marshall, G.A.K. (1916). Coleoptera: Rhynchophora: Curculionidae. In: Shipley, A.E. (Ed.), The fauna of British India, includ-
ing Ceylon and Burma. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. i–xv + 1–367.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9237
Marshall, G.A.K. (1942) On some East African Otiorrhynchinae (Col., Curcul.). The Annals and Magazine of Natural History,
Series 11, 9 (49), 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03745481.1942.9755459
Marshall, G.A.K. (1956) The Otiorrhynchine Curculionidae of the tribe Celeuthetini (Col.). British Museum (Natural History),
London, 134 pp.
Meregalli, M., Borovec, R., Cervella, P., Santovito, A., Toševski, I., Ottati, S. & Nakládal, O. (2021) The Namaini, a new weevil
tribe with six new genera from South Africa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society, 20, 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa142
Morimoto, K. & Kojima, H. (2001) Isopterina, a new subtribe of the tribe Celeuthetini, with notes on the related taxa (Coleop-
tera, Curculionidae). Elytra, 29 (2), 265–283.
Morrone, J.J. (1998) Anomophthalmina subtrib. n., an endemic subtribe of Entimini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from western
Patagonia. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, 57 (1–4), 85–89.
Morrone, J.J. &Hlaváč, P. (2017) Checklist of the micro- and anophthalmic soil-dwelling weevils of the world (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae). Zootaxa, 4239 (1), 1–102.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4239.1.1
Oberprieler, R.G., Marvaldi, A.E. & Anderson, R.S. (2007) Weevils, weevils, weevils everywhere. Zootaxa, 1668 (1), 491–
520.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.24
Oberprieler, R.G., Anderson, R.S. & Marvaldi, A.E. (2014) 3. Curculionoidea Latreille, 1802: introduction, phylogeny. In: Le-
schen, R.A.B. & Beutel, R.G. (Eds.), Handbook of Zoology, Arthropoda: Insecta; Coleoptera, Beetles. Vol. 3. Morphology
and systematics (Phytophaga). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp. 285–309.
Osella, G. & Bellò, C. (2010) Revisione di Minyops Schoenherr, 1823 e Paraminyops nov. gen. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Mo-
BELLO’ ET AL.
84 · Zootaxa 4938 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press
lytinae). Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 2. Serie, Sezione Scienze della Vita, 19, 1–133. [2009]
Pascoe, F.P. (1872) Contributions towards a knowledge of the Curculionidae. Part III. (Plates X., XI. XII, XIII.). Journal of the
Linnean Society of London, 11 (55), 440–492.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1872.tb01668.x
Pierce, W.D. (1913) Miscellaneous contributions to the knowledge of the weevils of the families Attelabidae and Brachyrhini-
dae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 45 (1988), 365–426.
https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.1988.365
Reitter, E. (1913) Bestimmungs-Schlüssel der mir bekannten europäischen Gattungen der Curculionidae, mit Einschluss der
mir bekannten Gattungen aus dem palaearctischen Gebiete. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brunn, 51,
1–90. [1912]
Sharp, D. (1891) Series Otiorhynchinae Apterae. In: Sharp, D. & Champion, G.C. (1889–1911), Biologia Centrali Americana.
Insecta. Coleoptera. Vol. IV. Part 3. Rhynchophora. Curculionidae. Attelabinae, Pterocolinae, Allocoryninae, Apioninae,
Thecesterninae, Otiorhynchinae. Published for the editors by R. H. Porter, London, pp. 87–177.
Sharp, D. (1919) Studies in Rhynchophora (Coleoptera). V. The genus Rhyncogonus. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomologi-
cal Society, 4 (1), 77–82. [1918/1920]
Article
Full-text available
Supplementary data and taxonomic changes are provided for the listing of the subterranean beetles of the Balkan Peninsula (Hlaváč, Perreau & Čeplík, 2017), published from July 1st 2016 to September 30th 2023. An illustrated supplement catalogue and distribution of taxa by zoogeographic regions sensu Hlaváč et al., are given.
Article
Full-text available
Undarobius gen. n., a new genus of cavernicolous weevils with two new species, U. howarthi sp. n. and U. irvini sp. n., is described from the Undara Lava Cave system in north-eastern Queensland, Australia. These are the first cavernicolous weevils to be described from Australia, and U. howarthi is a new addition to the rich arthropod fauna of Bayliss Cave. Undarobius weevils are relatively large in size (4.0–5.5 mm long), anophthalmic and apterous with a robust, flattened body and long legs. The genus has affinities with Leptopiini, but its placement in the tribe is uncertain. We also provide a list of the known anophthalmic and microphthalmic weevils in Australia, spanning 65 species classified in 20 genera, eight tribes and about seven subfamilies and found in diverse hypogean habitats, mainly leaf litter but also soil, beach sand, subterranean aquifers and mosses.
Article
Full-text available
Based on a phylogenetic analysis of a large number of mainly undescribed edaphic Entiminae from South Africa, a new tribe of entimine weevils is described, which includes six new genera. Taxa included in Namaini trib. nov. are clustered into seven clades that are used to delimit the following genera: Nama, type genus of the tribe, plus the new genera Cederbergia gen. nov., Cervellaea gen. nov., Namaquania gen. nov., Pentamerica gen. nov., Springbokia gen. nov. and Yamalaka gen. nov. A key to the genera is given and four new species are described.
Article
Full-text available
Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae, Otiorhynchus, replacement name, primary homonym.
Article
Full-text available
This contribution deals with a total of 71 species of the curculionoid families Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae and Curculionidae (except for Scolytinae) recorded from Socotra Island, based on both literature and new records. The following twelve new genera of Curculionidae are described: Armifemur gen. nov. (type species A. pusillus sp. nov.), Bezdekiellus gen. nov. (type species B. lucidulus sp. nov.), Elwoodius gen. nov. (type species E. barbatus sp. nov.) and Hajekia gen. nov. (type species H. microps sp. nov.) in Cossoninae: Dryotribini; Dipnotyphlus gen. nov. (type species: D. laminiscapus sp. nov.) in Cossoninae: Onycholipini; Parvorhynchus gen. nov. (type species: P. sordidus sp. nov.) in Entiminae: Otiorhynchini; Ericiates gen. nov. (type species: E. cinereus sp. nov.), Nesotocerus gen. nov. (type species: N. rectus sp. nov.), Socotracerus gen. nov. (type species: S. delumbis sp. nov.), Socotractus gen. nov. (type species: S. peteri sp. nov.), and Tuberates gen. nov. (type species: T. pustulatus sp. nov.) in Entiminae: Peritelini; Hagherius gen. nov. (type species H. sculptus sp. nov.) in Conoderinae: Menemachini. The following 51 new species are described and illustrated: Afrothymapion maculiferum sp. nov., Armifemur pusillus sp. nov., Bezdekiellus lucidulus sp. nov., Cossonus krali sp. nov., C. ochreipennis sp. nov., Dipnotyphlus laminiscapus sp. nov., Elwoodius barbatus sp. nov., Endeochetus crassirostris sp. nov., E. helenae sp. nov., E. maculifer sp. nov., E. minimus sp. nov., E. parvus sp. nov., E. pressicornis sp. nov., E. rugulithorax sp. nov., E. saccofrancisci sp. nov., E. simillimus sp. nov., E. simplex sp. nov., Epactus auromaculatus sp. nov., E. hirticornis sp. nov., E. hispidus sp. nov., Ericiates cinereus sp. nov., Hagherius sculptus sp. nov., Hajekia elongata sp. nov., H. hirticula sp. nov., H. hispidirostris sp. nov., H. lucida sp. nov., H. microps sp. nov., H. opaca sp. nov., H. parvopunctata sp. nov., Marvaldiella insularis sp. nov., M. truncata sp. nov., Mechistocerus inornatus sp. nov., Mesoxenomorphus rugipennis sp. nov., Molybdotus minor sp. nov., M. mixtus sp. nov., M. viridiaureus sp. nov., Nematocerus barbitibia sp. nov., N. spinifemur sp. nov., Nesotocerus complanatus sp. nov., N. griseovestitus sp. nov., N. labeculatus sp. nov., N. rectus sp. nov., Parvorhynchus sordidus sp. nov., Sibinia caldaraedicata sp. nov., Socotracerus contortipes sp. nov., S. delumbis sp. nov., Socotractus micans sp. nov., S. peteri sp. nov., Systates hlavaci sp. nov., S. spinipennis sp. nov., and Tuberates pustulatus sp. nov. The following new combinations are established: Nematocerus globosus (Gestro, 1892), comb. nov., N. humerosus (Gestro, 1892), comb. nov., and Socotractus angusticollis (Taschenberg, 1883), comb. nov. (all from Systates Gerstaecker, 1871), and Molybdotus vermiculosus (Waterhouse, 1881) comb. nov. (from Piazomias Schoenherr, 1840). Caenocotaster Voss, 1971, stat. nov., is promoted to genus from subgenus of Cotaster Motschulsky, 1851. The new substitute name Cossonus alphonsephilus nom. nov. is proposed to replace Cossonus gibbirostris Hustache, 1936, not Cossonus gibbirostris Roelofs, 1875. Keys to species of Hajekia gen. nov., Nesotocerus gen. nov., Endeochetus Kolbe, 1898, to Socotran Molybdotus Fairmaire, 1882, and to Socotran Peritelini genera are given. © 2014 Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae Allrights received.
Article
Full-text available
An overview is presented of the progress made on the taxonomy, classification and phylogeny of weevils in the 250 years since the first taxonomic descriptions of weevils by Carolus Linnaeus. The number of described weevils species is calculated to be about 62 000 and the likely total number of existing species 220 000, indicating that we have described just over a quarter of the diversity of this important group of beetles and that, at current rates of discovery and description, it will take another 650 years or so to describe the rest. Within the framework of the current concept of weevil phylogeny, a brief account is given of the seven main weevil lineages (families), and of the subfamilies of the largest of them, the Curculionidae, summarising their diversity, distribution and biology and identifying the major classificatory problems remaining in each. In conjunction with the phylogenetic hypothesis of weevil relationships and their fossil record, which is briefly summarised, the evolutionary history of weevils is mapped as a sequence of key evolutionary innovations that together have led to the phenomenal diversification and success of weevils.
Article
Omissions from and corrections to Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal (1999) and Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal (2002) are given. The following valid taxon described before 2000 was absent and is now included: Oedeuops Zhang, 1989 (fossil) in Attelabidae. A new replacement name is proposed in Brachyceridae: Brotheusini Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal, nom. nov., for Brotheini Marshall, 1907, non Simon, 1879 (Scorpiones). New synonymies are: Mecocerini Lacordaire 1866 (= Cappadocini Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999, syn. nov.) and Phloeophilus Schoenherr, 1833 (= Cappadox Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999, syn. nov. = Platynorhynchus Schoenherr, 1839, syn. nov.) in Anthribidae; Cnemoxys Marshall, 1956 (= Lavabrenymus Hoffmann, 1966, syn. nov.) in Curculionidae Conoderinae. Omitted synonymies are: Otiorhynchus (Thalycrynchus) Reitter, 1912 (= Panaphilis Dejean, 1821) (removed from synonymy with Otiorhynchus s. str) and Brachysomus Schoenherr, 1823 (= Pseudoptochus Formanek, 1905) in Curculionidae Entiminae. A new combination is: Cnemoxys armatus (Hoffmann, 1966) comb. nov. from Lavabrenymus Hoffmann, 1966. New placements are: Alloschema Jordan, 1928 to Zygaenodini (from Cappadocini) (Anthribidae). Diastatotropis Lacordaire, 1866, Systellorhynchus Blanchard, 1849 and Perroudius Holloway, 1982 to Anthribinae incertae sedis (from Cappadocini) (Anthribidae). Eczesaris Pascoe, 1859 and Ethneca Pascoe, 1860 to Mecocerini (from Cappadocini) (Anthribidae). Codmius Faust, 1895 to Conoderinae Campyloscelini Corynemerina (from Baridinae Madarini Tonesiina) (Curculionidae). The subgenera Acercomecus Reitter, 1903, Gnathomecus Reitter, 1903 and Hypesamus Reitter, 1903 are wrongly listed under Esamus Chevrolat, 1880 and should be transferred to be under Megamecus Reitter, 1903.
Article
The type material of three Spanish and two Moroccan taxa of Curculionidae is studied and its identity is assessed, resulting in the following new synonymies: Sciaphilus Schoenherr, 1823 = Elevatosomus Zumpt, 1933; Sciaphilus costulatus Kiesenwetter, 1852 = Eusomus (Elevatosomus) freyi Zumpt, 1933; Pachyrhinus Schoenherr, 1823 = Parisodrosus Voss, 1936; Pachyrhinus javeti (Desbrochers, 1871) = Polydrosus (Parisodrosus) balearicus Voss, 1936; Larinus Dejean, 1821 = Rungsonymus Hoffmann, 1950; Larinus (Larinus) buccinator (Olivier, 1807) = Rungsonymus ambiguus Hoffmann, 1950; Lixoglyptus Reitter, 1916 = Resmecaspis Hoffmann, 1959; Lixus (Lixoglyptus) spartii Olivier, 1807 = Mecaspis (Resmecaspis) pecoudi Hoffmann, 1959; Neseremnus Marshall, 1921 = Kocheriana Hoffmann, 1953. Lixoglyptus Reitter, 1916 is raised to genus (stat. prom.) and transferred from Lixini to Cleonini (new placement). Three species are transferred to other genera: Lixoglyptus spartii (Olivier, 1807) comb. n., Lixoglyptus mogadorus (Heyden, 1887) comb. n. and Neseremnus grassellyi (Hoffmann, 1953) comb. n. A lectotype is designated for Polydrosus (Parisodrosus) balearicus Voss, 1936.