- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from URBAN DESIGN International
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
URBAN DESIGN International (2022) 27:307–321
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00148-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Narrative spatial analytics (NSA) inurban landscape research
anddesign
PavleStamenović1· ĐorđeBulajić1
Accepted: 28 November 2020 / Published online: 18 February 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
This research investigates the condition of unbuilt spaces in urban areas that reside in the interim between previous use and
not-yet-decided new development. These unbuilt spaces are considered as valuable in the context of urban landscape. In
order to acknowledge the character and quality of unbuilt spaces, design and planning procedures need to incorporate new
interpretative techniques. The proposed NSA method integrates three research-by-design techniques that enable landscape
researchers/designers to broaden the scope of disciplinary research practice. The conducted research is interdisciplinary
and stands in the intersection of two research fields in the context of scale—urban planning and architectural design. The
aim of this research is to propose the new methodological apparatus, which offers a holistic view on the notion of territory
in regard to the notion of scale. The analysis takes the position that small-scale architectural design procedures and methods
also apply to the scale of the landscape—territory. The proposed method—Narrative Spatial Analytics (NSA)—is based on
simultaneous design procedures in opposing scales, assuming the overall significance of simultaneous understanding of the
territory and the site.
Keywords Narrative spatial analytics· Landscape architecture research methods· Narrative drawing· Analytical mapping·
Architectural montage· Iterative design
Introduction
The contemporary urban context has a dual nature: the rais-
ing ecological concern serves as the metanarrative of the
first decades of the twenty-first century (Myerson 1997),
while the ever-growing urbanization is consuming ever-
more spatial resources. In regard to this condition, this paper
focuses on acknowledging and emphasizing the potentials
of unbuilt spaces in the context of the contemporary state
of built environments. Namely, this research focuses on the
relationship between the built and the unbuilt that together
compose the context of urban landscape. The notion of
unbuilt or informal urban greenspace—IUG (Rupprecht and
Byrne 2014a, b)—is conceptualized as the open space voids
in between the constructed environment. Also, the unbuilt
can refer to conceptual spaces and designs that have not
come to be constructed, which therefore transcend the con-
straints of physical space. In this sense, the archipelago of
these spaces holds the potential for improving the condition
of urban landscape. This attitude towards the unbuilt space
drives this research towards landscape design theory and
practice, through rethinking of the ways of improving urban
landscape without building. Furthermore, regarding urban
development, singular architectural or landscape design pro-
jects often do not communicate with a bigger scale of the
city and the territory. Therefore, in order to better under-
stand the impact and relevance of a particular architectural
design intervention, it is necessary to acknowledge broader
spatial context. On the other hand, planning framework is
often focused on quantitative data-based analytics, which
significantly diminish the importance of qualitative char-
acteristics of a given territory. The result of this dichotomy
between the scale of design and the scale of planning is
perceived as unfavorable to the overall quality of decision-
making processes both in the field of planning as in the field
of design. Thus, this paper explores some concepts on inter-
disciplinary capacity of this subject, attempting to contribute
* Pavle Stamenović
pavle.stamenovic@arh.bg.ac.rs
Đorđe Bulajić
dj.bulajic.phd@edu.arh.bg.ac.rs
1 Faculty ofArchitecture, University ofBelgrade, Bulevar
Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11200Belgrade, Serbia
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.