No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.
Alle origini (terminologiche) della vulnerabilità: vulnerabilis, vulnus, vulnerare
... In a metaphorical sense, vulnus denoted the moral sphere affecting the soul or the psyche (wounds of life and of love), and it could even be attributed to the State. Otherwise, vulnerabilis was referring only to the physical dimension, indicating the possibility of being wounded in the body, but it was not used to designate certain categories of people such as women or minors (Maragno 2018). ...
In recent years, the concept of vulnerability has emerged in bioethics eroding the primacy of the autonomous and self-sufficient individual of the mainstream approach, regarding vulnerability as an obstacle to be removed. The Covid-19 pandemic has underscored an awareness that is not new, yet often little considered, namely that vulnerability is both a universal condition, and a special state dependent on social and economic causes, making the traditional concept of health inadequate to provide answers in the healthcare field. The aim of the work is to examine how the pandemic has challenged the well-being conception of health, and the impact on healthcare and healthcare workers of a definition of health based on vulnerability. Indeed, the connection between health and vulnerability has some practical implications. Particularly, it can shift the focus to vulnerability of healthcare professionals, who have always been considered almost immune from it with the effect of obscuring the dimension of reciprocity between the patient and the physician. The Covid-19 pandemic has made a contribution in the process already began of rethinking health in the light of vulnerability, by bringing out the notion of relational health, and stressing the need to educate to a new approach, in order to increase the wellbeing of all subjects involved in the caring relationship.
With the introduction/start of Horizon Europe, the European Commission made gender equality plans a basic requirement for participation in its research framework programme. Not all institutions have adopted the GEP – some have done so only partially – however, the document represents an attempt to pursue gender equality in different areas. The GEP at the academic level may represent an attempt to apply the vulnerability paradigm to contexts. In accordance with the purpose of the GEP, the analysis of language becomes central, especially in its performative and reiterative key of discriminatory patterns. Reflecting on communication opens the possibility of counteracting stereotypes and creating equal environments through, for example, the creation of specific vademecums. Therefore, using the theoretical lenses of vulnerability and language, a reflection on the opportunities offered by the adoption of GEP is made
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.