A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Mindfulness
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
REVIEW
Meditation, Mindfulness, and Attention: a Meta-analysis
David Sumantry
1
&Kathleen E. Stewart
1
Accepted: 15 January 2021
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Objectives Despite being an ancient tradition, meditation has only become a popular inquiry of research over the past few
decades. This resurgence can partially be attributed to the popularization of Eastern meditative practices, such as mindfulness,
into Western culture. Though the mechanisms of meditation are not yet scientifically well-understood, systems of attention and
executive control may play an important role. The present study aimed to examine potential attentional mechanisms of attention-
based meditations across studies.
Methods This paper examines behavioral measures of attention across literature. Studies (K= 87) that assigned participants to or
recruited participants who use techniques common in mindfulness practices (focused attention, open monitoring, or both) were
meta-analyzed. Outcomes were coded according to attentional network (alerting, orienting, executive control) or facet of exec-
utive control (inhibition, shifting, updating).
Results Meta-analytic results suggest that generalized attention (g= 0.171, 95% CI [0.119, 0.224]), its alerting (g=0.158,95%
CI [0.059, 0.256]) and executive control (g= 0.203, 95% CI [0.143, 0.264]) networks, and the inhibition (g=0.159,95%CI
[0.064, 0.253]) and updating (g= 0.256 [0.176, 0.337]) facets of executive control are improved by meditation. There was
significant heterogeneity in attention, the alerting and executive control networks, and the inhibition facet. Studies that taught
both FA and OM techniques did not show attentional improvements over those that taught the techniques in isolation. Meditation
led to greater improvements in accuracy-based tasks than reaction time tasks.
Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that attention is likely implicated in meditation, and meditation may improve some, but
not all, attentional processes. Implications for understanding meditational mechanisms and moderator-related differences are
discussed.
Keywords Meditation .Meta-analysis .Attention .Executive control
Meditation—particularly mindfulness meditation—has dra-
matically risen in popularity in western cultures over the last
several decades (see Van Dam et al. 2018). Despite empirical
support that meditation may be beneficial for a variety of
populations and may both improve quality of life (e.g.,
Reibel et al. 2001) and reduce negative mental health out-
comes (e.g., Tickell et al. 2019), understanding the mecha-
nisms through which meditative practices work is crucial for
further refinement. Exploring mechanisms will help to high-
light the potentially crucial components of meditation, which
in turn can help to maximize the benefits of practice. One of
the key components of various meditations is a trained ability
to focus on the present moment (Hölzel et al. 2011; Wallace
2007). As such, improved attentional ability may be one
mechanism that drives the outcomes of meditative practices
(Kok et al. 2013).
Understanding the mechanisms behind meditation are only
possible after answering the question, “which meditation?”as
meditative traditions and techniques can be drastically differ-
ent from one another. Moreover, Western versions of mind-
fulness and other meditative practices tend to prioritize quan-
tifiable outcomes that can be readily studied (e.g., symptom
relief or productive gains) rather than embrace the holistic
Eastern perspectives from which they came (see Monteiro
et al. 2015, for a review). Dahl et al. (2015) described three
families of meditative practices into which many can be clas-
sified. The attentional family includes focused attention (FA)
and open monitoring (OM; alternatively, open presence) prac-
tices, which are centered around attention regulation (see also
*David Sumantry
David.Sumantry@ryerson.ca
1
Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2L3,
Canada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01593-w
/ Published online: 2 February 2021
Mindfulness (2021) 12:1332–1349
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.