ArticlePublisher preview available

The Marginal Utility of Inequality: A Global Examination across Ethnographic Societies

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Despite decades of research, we still lack a clear explanation for the emergence and persistence of inequality. Here we propose and evaluate a marginal utility of inequality hypothesis that nominates circumscription and environmental heterogeneity as independent, necessary conditions for the emergence of intragroup material inequality. After coupling the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS) with newly generated data from remote sensing, we test predictions derived from this hypothesis using a multivariate generalized additive model that accounts for spatial and historical dependence as well as subsistence mode. Our analyses show that the probability a society will be stratified increases significantly as a function of proxies of environmental heterogeneity and environmental circumscription. This supports the hypothesis that increasing environmental heterogeneity and circumscription drives the emergence and persistence of inequality among documented societies across the globe. We demonstrate how environmental heterogeneity and circumscription produce situations that limit individuals’ options so that some may find it in their best interest to give up some autonomy for material gain, while others may find it in their best interest to give up some material resources for another individual’s time or deference. These results support the marginal utility of inequality framework and enable future explorations of the ecological conditions that facilitate the emergence of intragroup inequality through time and across the globe.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
The Marginal Utility of Inequality
A Global Examination across Ethnographic Societies
Kurt M. Wilson
1
&Brian F. Codding
1
Accepted: 15 December 2020/
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Despite decades of research, we still lack a clear explanation for the emergence and
persistence of inequality. Here we propose and evaluate a marginal utility of inequality
hypothesis that nominates circumscription and environmental heterogeneity as inde-
pendent, necessary conditions for the emergence of intragroup material inequality.
After coupling the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS) with newly generated data
from remote sensing, we test predictions derived from this hypothesis using a multi-
variate generalized additive model that accounts for spatial and historical dependence
as well as subsistence mode. Our analyses show that the probability a society will be
stratified increases significantly as a function of proxies of environmental heterogeneity
and environmental circumscription. This supports the hypothesis that increasing envi-
ronmental heterogeneity and circumscription drives the emergence and persistence of
inequality among documented societies across the globe. We demonstrate how envi-
ronmental heterogeneity and circumscription produce situations that limit individuals
options so that some may find it in their best interest to give up some autonomy for
material gain, while others may find it in their best interest to give up some material
resources for another individuals time or deference. These results support the
marginal utility of inequality framework and enable future explorations of the
ecological conditions that facilitate the emergence of intragroup inequality
through time and across the globe.
Keywords Inequality .Social complexity .Social hierarchy .Behavioral ecology .
Circumscription .Standard Cross-Cultural Sample
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09383-4
*Kurt M. Wilson
kurt.wilson@utah.edu
1
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 260 S. Central Campus Drive, Room 4625, Salt
LakeCity,UT84112,USA
Published online: 1 February 2021
Human Nature (2020) 31:361–386
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Understanding unequal resource access and patterns of behaviour among foraging populations is a longstanding topic of interest [1][2][3][4], with scholars centring debate on whether the evolutionary pathway of human inequality is one of unique emergence [5][6][7][8][9] or suppression [10][11][12][13][14]. Given the significant variation in inequality present among human and non-human populations [11,[15][16][17][18][19], it seems likely that, regardless of the evolutionary pathway, plasticity allows inequality-related behaviour to respond to local environments and resource characteristics, as has indeed been extensively documented (e.g. [5,16,20,21,22]). ...
... Here we follow recent work suggesting territoriality and inequality may be correlated within human populations [30] and explore key resource characteristics that scholars have hypothesized (individually or through interaction) should promote territoriality and/or inequality through pay-offs for controlling access to resources. Specifically, we investigate resource predictability [1,16], abundance [1,31], heterogeneity [5,15,32,33], the economy of scale or Allee effect of resources [32, [34][35][36] and the monopolizability (or ability to control access) of resources patches [5,35,[37][38][39] which we summarize below. ...
... Spatial distribution of the primary resource within an environment is one of the characteristics that has received increasing attention (e.g. [5,15,32,33,35]). Highly heterogeneous environments, those where resources occur in some restricted locations but not in others, may have cascading consequences for both territoriality and inequality. ...
Article
Full-text available
Understanding how resource characteristics influence variability in social and material inequality among foraging populations is a prominent area of research. However, obtaining cross-comparative data from which to evaluate theoretically informed resource characteristic factors has proved difficult, particularly for investigating interactions of characteristics. Therefore, we develop an agent-based model to evaluate how five key characteristics of primary resources (predictability, heterogeneity, abundance, economy of scale and monopolizability) structure pay-offs and explore how they interact to favour both egalitarianism and inequality. Using iterated simulations from 243 unique combinations of resource characteristics analysed with an ensemble machine-learning approach, we find the predictability and heterogeneity of key resources have the greatest influence on selection for egalitarian and nonegalitarian outcomes. These results help explain the prevalence of egalitarianism among foraging populations, as many groups probably relied on resources that were both relatively less predictable and more homogeneously distributed. The results also help explain rare forager inequality, as comparison with ethnographic and archaeological examples suggests the instances of inequality track strongly with reliance on resources that were predictable and heterogeneously distributed. Future work quantifying comparable measures of these two variables, in particular, may be able to identify additional instances of forager inequality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.
... Sie fand im Zuge einer Stabilisierung der klimatischen Verhältnisse statt, die zu einer größeren Verlässlichkeit natürlicher Bedingungen der Überschussproduktion an Nahrungsmitteln beitrug. Die Menschen ließen sich dauerhaft lokal nieder und ihre Ortsbindung mit den schon erwähnten Folgen für die Durchsetzbarkeit von Ungleichheitsverhältnissen erhöhte sich (Wilson & Codding, 2021). 14 Die Entwicklung agrarischer Gesellschaften dürfte daher die Verbreitung institutionalisierter sozialer Ungleichheit befördert haben (Sterelny, 2021, S. 129 f.;Price, 2021). ...
... Hayden, 2007) notwendige, wenn auch noch nicht hinreichende Voraussetzung für das Aufkommen sozialer Ungleichheit. In ihrer historisch-empirischen Analyse können sie für die "environmental heterogeneity", die "circumscription" und die Art der Lebensmittelproduktion signifikante Effekte nachweisen (Wilson & Codding, 2021). vorherrschend (Mattison et al., 2016, S. 191). ...
... However, Kohler & Higgins [25] argued that ceremonial systems may have been effective leveling devices in some Pueblo I societies, and if so, overturning those systems must have been important to the growth of the Chacoan polity. All in all, our results support findings from recent cross-cultural research that social stratification increases significantly as environmental heterogeneity and environmental circumscription increase [67]though the circumscription in the societies examined here was both demographic and environmental in nature. ...
... At that point a polity will look attractive for its ability to move production around to buffer spatial and temporal shortfalls and to suppress wasteful competitive violence among villages within its span of control. Prospective participants may well be ready to give up some autonomy given dwindling outside options, and their labour will be highly attractive to potential patrons as such societies are in the transition from labour-limited to land-limited [67,68]. Further growth will be assisted by the growing difficulty of escaping the system as populations have already expanded into the most productive areas. ...
Article
Full-text available
Persistent differences in wealth and power among prehispanic Pueblo societies are visible from the late AD 800s through the late 1200s, after which large portions of the northern US Southwest were depopulated. In this paper we measure these differences in wealth using Gini coefficients based on house size, and show that high Ginis (large wealth differences) are positively related to persistence in settlements and inversely related to an annual measure of the size of the unoccupied dry-farming niche. We argue that wealth inequality in this record is due first to processes inherent in village life which have internally different distributions of the most productive maize fields, exacerbated by the dynamics of systems of balanced reciprocity; and second to decreasing ability to escape village life owing to shrinking availability of unoccupied places within the maize dry-farming niche as villages get enmeshed in regional systems of tribute or taxation. We embed this analytical reconstruction in the model of an ‘Abrupt imposition of Malthusian equilibrium in a natural-fertility, agrarian society’ proposed by Puleston et al. (Puleston C, Tuljapurkar S, Winterhalder B. 2014 PLoS ONE 9, e87541 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087541)), but show that the transition to Malthusian dynamics in this area is not abrupt but extends over centuries This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.
... Circumscription theory, as it is commonly referred to, has been attractive because it is built on a seemingly logical and compelling rationale, and seems to fit well with the observation that complex hierarchical societies often emerged in places where there were apparent barriers to dispersal and environmental heterogeneity [6][7][8][9]. But even discounting the fact that there may be other potential hypotheses that can explain socio-political evolution, the theory has been criticized on a number of fronts [10][11][12][13]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Circumscription theory proposes that complex hierarchical societies emerged in areas surrounded by barriers to dispersal, e.g. mountains or seas. This theory has been widely influential but the lack of formal modelling has resulted in theoretical and empirical challenges. This theory shares parallels with reproductive skew models from evolutionary ecology where inequality depends on the capacity of subordinates to escape from despotic leaders. Building on these similarities, we extend reproductive skew models to simulate the concurrent evolution of inequality in many connected groups. Our results show that cost of migration does not directly limit inequality in the long term, but it does control the rate of increase in inequality. Second, we show that levels of inequality can be reduced if there are random errors made by dominants, as these lead to variations that propagate between polities. Third, our model clarifies the concept of circumscription by relating it to geographical features: the size of a region and the connectivity between polities. Overall, our model helps clarify some issues about how migration may affect inequality. We discuss our results in the light of anthropological and archaeological evidence and present the future extensions required to build towards a complete model of circumscription theory. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.
... Focus has primarily been on the macro-level ecological processes and structural features that cause material wealth inequality to emerge. Anthropologists, in particular, focus on the environmental conditions that allow individuals differential access to material resources [37]. Specifically, climatic stability [38], circumscription [39], resource density and patchiness [40], storage [41] and institutions for intergenerational transmission [9] can produce pay-off structures for individuals that encourage the privatization of resources [42][43][44], thereby giving rise to inequality [8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The extent of inequality in material wealth across different types of societies is well established. Less clear, however, is how material wealth is associated with relational wealth, and the implications of such associations for material wealth inequality. Theory and evidence suggest that material wealth both guides, and is patterned by, relational wealth. While existing comparative studies typically assume complementarity between different types of wealth, such associations may differ for distinct kinds of relational wealth. Here, we first review the literature to identify how and why different forms of relational wealth may align. We then turn to an analysis of household-level social networks (food sharing, gender-specific friendship and gender-specific co-working networks) and material wealth data from a rural community in Pemba, Zanzibar. We find that (i) the materially wealthy have most relational ties, (ii) the associations between relational and material wealth—as well as relational wealth more generally—are patterned by gender differences, and (iii) different forms of relational wealth have similar structural properties and are closely aligned. More broadly, we show how examining the patterning of distinct types of relational wealth provides insights into how and why inequality in material wealth remains muted in a community undergoing rapid economic change. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.
... Out of these decisions, broader patterning emerges, such as sustainable land use (Moritz et al. 2018), divisions of labor (e.g., Codding et al. 2011), hierarchy (e.g., Smith andWilson and Codding 2020), ethno-linguistic diversity (Codding and Jones 2013), and other cultural phenomena (e.g., Smith et al. 2017). As the product of individual decisions in a local context, explanation of these sociocultural phenomena requires research focused on individuals and their relations, not on the emergent properties themselves. ...
Chapter
Scale matters. When conducting research and writing, scholars upscale and downscale. So do the subjects of their work - we scale, they scale. Although scaling is an integrant part of research, we rarely reflect on scaling as a practice and what happens when we engage with it in scholarly work. The contributors aim to change this: they explore the pitfalls and potentials of scaling in an interdisciplinary dialogue. The volume brings together scholars from diverse fields, working on different geographical areas and time periods, to engage with scale-conscious questions regarding human sociality, culture, and evolution. With contributions by Nurit Bird-David, Robert L. Kelly, Charlotte Damm, Andreas Maier, Brian Codding, Elspeth Ready, Bram Tucker, Graeme Warren and others.
Article
Income inequality has increasingly become more ubiquitous within rather than across countries. Yet much of the theorizing has been at macro levels and does not sufficiently account for the firms within regions, which are primary sources of income inequality. Moreover, much of the research that does implicate firms, assumes that firms impact inequality equivalently. It neither accounts for the heterogeneity of firms within regions nor the potential for differential impact from that heterogeneity. Our study challenges these assumptions through a theory that connects a firm’s life cycle and recruiting and compensation strategies to its impact on income inequality within and across regions. We incorporate a set of contingencies that also have the potential to alter the model’s predictions, which are based on external shocks and ownership of the firm. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of this model for theory, policy, and practice.
Article
Comparative analysis using cross-cultural data has a long tradition in anthropology and applications by ecologically minded researchers have exploded in the past decade. Here we discuss problems and recommend solutions for use of cross-cultural datasets in ecology.
Chapter
Full-text available
Factionalism is an important force of social transformation, and this volume examines how factional competition in the kinship and political structures in ancient New World societies led to the development of chiefdoms, states and empires. The case studies, from a range of New World societies, represent all levels of non-egalitarian societies and a wide variety of ecological settings in the New World. They document the effects of factionalism on the structure of particular polities: for example, how it might have led to the growth of social inequality, or to changing patterns of chiefly authority, or to state formation and expansion, or institutional specialisation. The work is a creative and substantial contribution to our understanding of the political dynamics in early state society, and will interest archaeologists, anthropologists, political scientists and historians.
Article
Full-text available
Most human societies exhibit a distinct class structure, with an elite, middle classes, and a bottom class, whereas animals form simple dominance hierarchies in which individuals with higher fighting ability do not appear to form coalitions to “oppress” weaker individuals. Here, we extend our model of primate coalitions and find that a division into a bottom class and an upper class is inevitable whenever fitness-enhancing resources, such as food or real estate, are exploitable or tradable and the members of the bottom class cannot easily leave the group. The model predicts that the bottom class has a near flat, low payoff and always comprises at least half the society. The upper class may subdivide into one or more middle class(es), resulting in improved payoff for the topmost members (elite). The model predicts that the bottom class on its own is incapable of mounting effective counter-coalitions against the upper class, except when receiving support from dissatisfied members of the middle class(es). Such counter-coalitions can be prevented by keeping the payoff to the lowest-ranked members of the middle classes (through concessions) well above that of the bottom class. This simple model explains why classes are also absent in nomadic hunter-gatherers and predominate in (though are not limited to) societies that produce and store food. Its results also agree well with various other known features of societies with classes.
Article
Full-text available
The origins of religion and of complex societies represent evolutionary puzzles1–8. The ‘moralizing gods’ hypothesis offers a solution to both puzzles by proposing that belief in morally concerned supernatural agents culturally evolved to facilitate cooperation among strangers in large-scale societies9–13. Although previous research has suggested an association between the presence of moralizing gods and social complexity3,6,7,9–18, the relationship between the two is disputed9–13,19–24, and attempts to establish causality have been hampered by limitations in the availability of detailed global longitudinal data. To overcome these limitations, here we systematically coded records from 414 societies that span the past 10,000 years from 30 regions around the world, using 51 measures of social complexity and 4 measures of supernatural enforcement of morality. Our analyses not only confirm the association between moralizing gods and social complexity, but also reveal that moralizing gods follow—rather than precede—large increases in social complexity. Contrary to previous predictions9,12,16,18, powerful moralizing ‘big gods’ and prosocial supernatural punishment tend to appear only after the emergence of ‘megasocieties’ with populations of more than around one million people. Moralizing gods are not a prerequisite for the evolution of social complexity, but they may help to sustain and expand complex multi-ethnic empires after they have become established. By contrast, rituals that facilitate the standardization of religious traditions across large populations25,26 generally precede the appearance of moralizing gods. This suggests that ritual practices were more important than the particular content of religious belief to the initial rise of social complexity.
Book
This book addresses a central problem in anthropological archaeology—the emergence of “archaic states,” whose distinctive feature was divine kingship—taking as its focus the Hawaiian archipelago, commonly regarded as the archetype of a complex chiefdom. Integrating anthropology, linguistics, archaeology, traditional history, and theory, and drawing on significant contributions from four decades of research, it argues that Hawaiian polities had become states before the time of Captain Cook's voyage (1778–1779). The status of most archaic states is inferred from the archaeological record, but the book shows that because Hawai'i's kingdoms were established relatively recently, they could be observed and recorded by Cook and other European voyagers. The book contributes to the literature of precontact Hawai'i and illuminates Hawai'i's importance in the global theory and literature about divine kingship, archaic states, and sociopolitical evolution.
Article
This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour- vs land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.
Article
Some human subsistence economies are characterized by extensive daily food sharing networks, which may buffer the risk of shortfalls and facilitate cooperative production and divisions of labor among households. Comparative studies of human food sharing can assess the generalizability of this theory across time, space, and diverse lifeways. Here we test several predictions about daily sharing norms-which presumably reflect realized cooperative behavior-in a globally representative sample of nonindustrial societies (the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample), while controlling for multiple sources of autocorrelation among societies using Bayesian multilevel models. Consistent with a risk-buffering function, we find that sharing is less likely in societies with alternative means of smoothing production and consumption such as animal husbandry, food storage, and external trade. Further, food sharing was tightly linked to labor sharing, indicating gains to cooperative production and perhaps divisions of labor. We found a small phylogenetic signal for food sharing (captured by a supertree of human populations based on genetic and linguistic data) that was mediated by food storage and social stratification. Food sharing norms reliably emerge as part of cooperative economies across time and space but are culled by innovations that facilitate self-reliant production.