ArticlePDF Available

A Boring Overview

Authors:
  • University of Minnesota

Abstract

Boredom is a common experience for everyone across the world—no matter how old you are or where you live, you can get bored. Boredom occurs when we are feeling negative and we want to be doing something other than what we are currently doing. Scientists think we may experience boredom as a way to tell ourselves that it is time to move on to something different. What we choose to do next may depend on what we are currently doing; we may choose to do something different based on whether we experience boredom during class vs. at home. Boredom is associated with some negative behaviors, but it may also lead to positive things like more creativity. This article provides an overview of the definition of boredom, who experiences boredom, when they experience it, and what behaviors and brain areas are associated with boredom.
NEUROSCIENCE
Published: 16 December 2020
doi: 10.3389/frym.2020.558229
A BORING OVERVIEW
Caitlin Mills *and Catherine McGrath *
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States
YOUNG REVIEWERS:
ORGANIZATION
FOR
HUMAN
BRAIN
MAPPING
AGES: 8–15
TIAN
AGE: 14
Boredom is a common experience for everyone across the world—no
matter how old you are or where you live, you can get bored.
Boredom occurs when we are feeling negative and we want to be
doing something other than what we are currently doing. Scientists
think we may experience boredom as a way to tell ourselves that it
is time to move on to something dierent. What we choose to do
next may depend on what we are currently doing; we may choose to
do something dierent based on whether we experience boredom
during class vs. at home. Boredom is associated with some negative
behaviors, but it may also lead to positive things like more creativity.
This article provides an overview of the definition of boredom, who
experiences boredom, when they experience it, and what behaviors
and brain areas are associated with boredom.
WHAT IS BOREDOM?
Almost everyone gets bored. The majority of people in the U.S.
experiences boredom at least once a day [2]. But what does it mean
BOREDOM
A negative experience
of wanting to do
something satisfying,
but being unable to
find a satisfying activity
at that time [1]. to be bored? Scientists commonly define boredom as the “experience
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |1
Mills and McGrath Boredom
of wanting, but being unable, to engage in satisfying activity” [1]. This
definition means that boredom: (1) is a negative feeling, and (2) is
experienced when we cannot find something better to do. Boredom
occurs so frequently that scientists want to understand why we get
bored and what happens when people experience boredom.
This article provides an overview of what scientists think about
boredom, including who gets bored, why we experience boredom,
and what happens in the brain during boredom.
WHO GETS BORED AND WHEN?
Everyone across the world gets bored, no matter how old they are,
where they live, or what gender they are. People feel bored in all
kinds of places: at school, home, or work. One study asked over 3,000
people to rate their levels of state boredom throughout their days
STATE BOREDOM
The experience of
boredom in a
given moment.
during their everyday lives [2]. These scientists found that some groups
of people report being bored more often than others. For example,
men report more boredom than women, and people who are younger
report more boredom than older people. They also found that people
feel more bored in certain places and at certain times. People are more
bored at school, work, and when they are studying, or spending time
with coworkers or strangers. People are less bored when they are with
their friends or family, or at a restaurant. People also feel more bored
in the afternoon compared to the morning or night. When people get
bored, it might be because what they are doing is either too easy or
too dicult for them. When what we are doing is too easy or too hard,
we may lose interest and have a hard time paying attention. Boredom
can also happen when something that used to feel exciting starts to
become less exciting.
When our feelings of boredom inspire us to explore new things,
those new things can be good or bad. Scientists have found that
people who are bored more often may also feel lonely, angry, sad,
or worried [2]. Boredom can be more extreme in some cases, like
for people with depression or traumatic brain injuries [3]. There is
no cure or medicine people can take to be less bored but there are
many ways people attempt cope with boredom—some ways may be
healthier than others! Boredom may also make it harder to do well on
schoolwork. However, it is important to point out that boredom has
positives aspects too. Boredom may inspire us to come up with more
ideas, be creative, and use our imaginations.
WHY DO SCIENTISTS THINK WE GET BORED?
When people get bored, they experience a lot of dierent things.
People who are bored feel unhappy. They have a hard time paying
attention, and they often think about other things. They can feel tired,
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |2
Mills and McGrath Boredom
stuck, and like time is moving slowly. Some scientists think we feel
these negative things as a way to send a message to ourselves [4, 5].
The message from boredom is that we do not like what we are doing
and that it is time to move on to something dierent so we can
stop feeling bored. Feeling boredom may help us realize that what
we are doing is not interesting to us. Boredom may also motivate
people to explore new things. When we are doing something that
is not entertaining, boredom can motivate us to do something else.
You might think of boredom like an alarm. It goes o when we are
doing an activity that we do not want to do. Boredom could guide us
toward something that we want to do more. It may also help keep us
on track with our goals or prevent us from staying stuck on one thing
for too long.
Sometimes, when we are bored, we can stop doing what we are doing,
and start doing something else. But sometimes we cannot simply do
something dierent. This might happen in the classroom when we are
listening to something boring or have to practice writing words over
and over. Even though we may be bored, we cannot just get up and
leave the classroom without getting into trouble! It is not surprising
that people respond to boredom dierently depending on what they
are doing (in class vs. playing at home). Someone who is bored while
watching a movie has more choices than someone who is bored while
doing homework.
Some people may also let their minds wander o to dierent things
and rely on their imaginations to entertain them when they cannot
escape their boring situations [6]. They may also be able to find more
exciting ways to think about what they are doing. A person doing
homework has to finish it, so that person may escape boredom by
making the homework more exciting, possibly by singing the math
problems or creating a mental game involving the homework.
HOW DO SCIENTISTS STUDY BOREDOM?
There are a few dierent ways scientists typically study boredom. The
first one is focused on what is called trait boredom, which is a person’s
TRAIT BOREDOM
A person’s general
likelihood of
being bored.
general likelihood to be bored. You can think about trait boredom
kind of like a personality type—do you tend to be bored much of the
time? Trait boredom is often measured by asking people to fill out a set
of questions called the Boredom Proneness Scale [7]. This scale asks
people to rate dierent statements on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to
7 (strongly agree). Statements include things like, “time always seems
to be passing slowly” or “I often find myself with nothing to do, time
on my hands.” We are not aware of any studies that have followed the
same people throughout their whole lives to see how their boredom
changes. However, scientists have found that older people generally
tend to report boredom less often [2]. It is possible that a person’s level
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |3
Mills and McGrath Boredom
of trait boredom may change throughout their life, but other factors
probably play a role too.
The second type of research on boredom focuses on state boredom,
which is boredom in a particular situation or moment. State boredom
is dierent from trait boredom because everyone can experience
boredom at some points in the day, even if they do not tend to be
bored all the time. Researchers often study state boredom in a few
dierent ways. One of them is to simply get people to do a boring
task. This method is called boredom induction. For example, imagine
BOREDOM
INDUCTION
An activity that
researchers ask people
do to make them feel
bored. For example,
this could be watching
a boring video, reading
a boring story, or
counting for a long
period of time.
having to sit and watch a video of people folding clothes over and
over—would this make you bored? If you answered yes, that is what
most people say. Another method is to ask people to rate their levels
of boredom randomly while they complete some task like reading or
watching a movie. This method allows researchers to see when and
how often people get bored.
WHAT ABOUT THE BORED BRAIN?
Scientists have also started to look at what happens in the brain when
people experience boredom. Most of these studies have used an
imaging technique called functional magnetic resonance imagining
FUNCTIONAL
MAGNETIC
RESONANCE
IMAGINING (fMRI)
A technique commonly
used by scientists to
measure brain activity.
It looks at changes in
blood flow. It is safe
and painless.
(fMRI) to understand which brain regions are “active,” or being used
more in comparison to a non-boring situation. fMRI works using the
properties of the blood flowing throughout the brain. To get an fMRI,
a person lies down in a big tube while a large magnet circles around
their head. The fMRI machine can sometimes be loud, but it is painless!
Scientists who study boredom will often induce state boredom while
people are in the fMRI scanner, and then they compare their brain
activity to another condition, in which the same people are not bored.
For example, they can compare brain activity when people are bored
to when they are doing an engaging task that they like or a demanding
task that requires them to try hard and pay close attention. So far,
researchers have not been able to identify a specific set of brain areas
that make up boredom. However, some research points to a part of the
brain referred to as the default network [8]. The default network is a set
DEFAULT NETWORK
A large brain network
made up of multiple
regions that are
typically associated
with things like
internally-oriented
thoughts, mind
wandering, and
memories about your
own life (also called
autobiographical
memory).
of brain regions that are active when you are thinking about yourself
or others, or when you are thinking about the past or imagining the
future. Activation of the default network might explain why bored
people often let their minds wander and think about other things.
SUMMARY
Boredom is a negative feeling that most of us experiences daily, but
it may also be helpful in some cases. Studying boredom scientifically
can help us understand our own behavior and experiences. It is
exciting that many scientists are continuing to investigate boredom
in our everyday lives and how boredom is manifests in the brain.
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |4
Mills and McGrath Boredom
Hopefully we will continue to learn more about the good and bad
parts of the boring experience for years to come. For now, enjoy
your boredom!
REFERENCES
1. Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., and Smilek, D. 2012. The unengaged
mind: defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:482–95.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612456044
2. Chin, A., Markey, A., Bhargava, S., Kassam, K. S., and Loewenstein, G. 2017. Bored
in the USA: experience sampling and boredom in everyday life. Emotion
17:359. doi: 10.1037/emo0000232
3. Goldberg, Y., and Danckert, J. 2013. Traumatic brain injury, boredom and
depression. Behav. Sci. 3:434–44. doi: 10.3390/bs3030434
4. Bench, S. W., and Lench, H. C. 2013. On the function of boredom. Behav. Sci.
3:459–72. doi: 10.3390/bs3030459
5. Elpidorou, A. 2017. The good of boredom. Philos. Psychol.
31:323–51. doi: 10.1080/ 09515089.2017.1346240
6. Mills, C., and Christo, K. 2018. Finding consistency in boredom by appreciating
its instability. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22:744–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.001
7. Farmer, R., and Sundberg, N. D. 1986. Boredom proneness–the development
and correlates of a new scale. J. Pers. Assess. 50:4–17. doi: 10.1207/s153277
52jpa5001_2
8. Danckert, J., and Merrifield, C. 2018. Boredom, sustained attention and the
default mode network. Exp. Brain Res. 236:2507–18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-
016-4617-5
SUBMITTED: 01 May 2020; ACCEPTED: 30 November 2020;
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 16 December 2020.
EDITED BY: Athina Tzovara, University of California, Berkeley, United States
CITATION: Mills C and McGrath C (2020) A Boring Overview. Front. Young
Minds 8:558229. doi: 10.3389/frym.2020.558229
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that the research was conducted in
the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed
as a potential conflict of interest.
COPYRIGHT © 2020 Mills and McGrath. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication
in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |5
Mills and McGrath Boredom
YOUNG REVIEWERS
ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, AGES: 8–15
As part of the Kids Live Review Event at OHBM 2020, Adrian, Louie, Pinaki, Reina,
and Tian, grilled the scientists on their work in front of an audience. This group of
elite reviewers provided pointed feedback that improved the quality of each of these
papers, ranging from boredom, irritability, and social learning, to brain surgeries and
Alzheimer’s disease.
TIAN, AGE: 14
I am very curious, and I love to learn about humans and our brains because they are
so complex and interesting. I also enjoy playing sports with my friends.
AUTHORS
CAITLIN MILLS
Caitlin Mills is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at the
University of New Hampshire. Her research focuses on the correlates and
consequences of mind-wandering, boredom, and other states that occur during
complex learning. *caitlin.mills@unh.edu
CATHERINE MCGRATH
Catherine McGrath graduated from the University of New Hampshire Honor’s
Program in 2020. She is currently a post-baccalaureate research assistant in the
Aect, Computation, and Cognition Lab at the University of New Hampshire.
*cam1064@unh.edu
kids.frontiersin.org December 2020 | Volume 08 |Article 558229 |6
... In 2020, the OHBM DIC collaborated with Frontiers for Young Minds (FYM 12 ) to introduce the first live review for children, aligning with FYM's ethos of "Science for kids, edited by kids" 13 , Since then, young reviewers aged 8-15, guided by scientist mentors, reviewed scientific papers written specifically for children during live events at OHBM annual meetings [14][15][16][17][18] . Despite the shift to virtual meetings in 2020 due to the pandemic, the inaugural event received enthusiastic responses from young reviewers, scientists, and the wider OHBM community. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The initiative "Brain Mappers of Tomorrow" coordinated by the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC) aims to make neuroscience accessible to children worldwide, particularly those from historically underrepresented backgrounds. Over the past several years, this successful initiative has grown and evolved, offering live reviews of scientific papers tailored for children in multiple languages. These live review events have seen exponential growth, engaging over 1,000 children in 2023 alone. Through partnerships and innovative strategies, the initiative has successfully reached diverse audiences, fostering curiosity and critical thinking in young minds. Although some challenges remain, including recruiting scientists and participants from underprivileged communities, ongoing efforts strive to overcome these barriers. The success of "Brain Mappers of Tomorrow" demonstrates the potential for similar initiatives across scientific disciplines, emphasizing the importance of diversity and inclusivity in science education and outreach. Such efforts can foster positive impacts at multiple levels, from individuals (children and presenters) to global society. This editorial highlights the benefits and challenges of such initiatives, shares experiences and resources to assist other scientific communities in launching similar endeavors, and discusses future directions.
... Moreover, the council has approved an open broadcast of the live review, in order to make it accessible to all children. Lastly, the articles that were presented during the live review have been published in Frontiers for Young Minds , in an open access format ( Blok and White, 2020 ;Girgis 2020 ;Korn and Rosenblau 2020 ;Loudjani et al., 2020 ;Mills and Mcgrath 2020 ), and they will also appear in the form of an e-book. ...
Preprint
Scientific research aims to bring forward innovative ideas and constantly challenges existing knowledge structures and stereotypes. However, women, ethnic and cultural minorities, as well as individuals with disabilities, are systematically discriminated against or even excluded from promotions, publications, and general visibility. A more diverse workforce is more productive, and thus discrimination has a negative impact on science and the wider society, as well as on the education, careers, and well-being of individuals who are discriminated against. Moreover, the lack of diversity at scientific gatherings can lead to micro-aggressions or harassment, making such meetings unpleasant, or even unsafe environments for early career and underrepresented scientists.At the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), we recognized the need for promoting underrepresented scientists and creating diverse role models in the field of neuroimaging. To foster this, the OHBM has created a Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC). In this article, we review the composition and activities of the DIC in order to inspire other organizations to implement similar initiatives. Activities of the committee over the past four years have included (a) creating a code of conduct, (b) providing diversity and inclusivity education for OHBM members, (c) organizing interviews and symposia on diversity issues, and (d) organizing family-friendly activities and providing child care grants during the OHBM annual meetings.We strongly believe that these activities have brought positive change within the wider OHBM community, improving inclusivity and fostering diversity while promoting rigorous, ground-breaking science. These positive changes could not have been so rapidly implemented without the enthusiastic support from the leadership, including OHBM Council and Program Committee, and the OHBM Special Interest Groups (SIGs), namely the Open Science, Student and Postdoc, and Brain-Art SIGs. Nevertheless, there remains ample room for improvement, in all areas, and even more so in the area of targeted attempts to increase inclusivity for individuals with disabilities, members of the LGBTQ+ community, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals of various socioeconomic status.Here, we present an overview of the DIC’s composition, its activities, future directions and challenges. Our goal is to share our experiences with a wider audience to provide information to other organizations and institutions wishing to implement similar comprehensive diversity initiatives. We propose that scientific organizations can push the boundaries of scientific progress only by moving beyond existing power structures and by integrating principles of acceptance and inclusivity in their core values.
Article
Full-text available
The initiative “Brain Mappers of Tomorrow” coordinated by the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC) aims to make neuroscience accessible to children worldwide, particularly those from historically underrepresented backgrounds. Over the past several years, this successful initiative has grown and evolved, offering live reviews of scientific papers tailored for children in multiple languages. These live review events have seen exponential growth, engaging over 1,000 children in 2023 alone. Through partnerships and innovative strategies, the initiative has successfully reached diverse audiences, fostering curiosity and critical thinking in young minds. Although some challenges remain, including recruiting scientists and participants from underprivileged communities, ongoing efforts strive to overcome these barriers. The success of “Brain Mappers of Tomorrow” demonstrates the potential for similar initiatives across scientific disciplines, emphasizing the importance of diversity and inclusivity in science education and outreach. Such efforts can foster positive impacts at multiple levels, from individuals (children and presenters) to global society. This editorial highlights the benefits and challenges of such initiatives, shares experiences and resources to assist other scientific communities in launching similar endeavors, and discusses future directions.
Article
Full-text available
Scientific research aims to bring forward innovative ideas and constantly challenges existing knowledge structures and stereotypes. However, women, ethnic and cultural minorities, as well as individuals with disabilities, are systematically discriminated against or even excluded from promotions, publications, and general visibility. A more diverse workforce is more productive, and thus discrimination has a negative impact on science and the wider society, as well as on the education, careers, and well-being of individuals who are discriminated against. Moreover, the lack of diversity at scientific gatherings can lead to micro-aggressions or harassment, making such meetings unpleasant, or even unsafe environments for early career and underrepresented scientists. At the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), we recognized the need for promoting underrepresented scientists and creating diverse role models in the field of neuroimaging. To foster this, the OHBM has created a Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC). In this article, we review the composition and activities of the DIC that have promoted diversity within OHBM, in order to inspire other organizations to implement similar initiatives. Activities of the committee over the past four years have included (a) creating a code of conduct, (b) providing diversity and inclusivity education for OHBM members, (c) organizing interviews and symposia on diversity issues, and (d) organizing family-friendly activities and providing childcare grants during the OHBM annual meetings. We strongly believe that these activities have brought positive change within the wider OHBM community, improving inclusivity and fostering diversity while promoting rigorous, ground-breaking science. These positive changes could not have been so rapidly implemented without the enthusiastic support from the leadership, including OHBM Council and Program Committee, and the OHBM Special Interest Groups (SIGs), namely the Open Science, Student and Postdoc, and Brain-Art SIGs. Nevertheless, there remains ample room for improvement, in all areas, and even more so in the area of targeted attempts to increase inclusivity for women, individuals with disabilities, members of the LGBTQ+ community, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals of lower socioeconomic status or from low and middle-income countries. Here, we present an overview of the DIC's composition, its activities, future directions and challenges. Our goal is to share our experiences with a wider audience to provide information to other organizations and institutions wishing to implement similar comprehensive diversity initiatives. We propose that scientific organizations can push the boundaries of scientific progress only by moving beyond existing power structures and by integrating principles of equity and inclusivity in their core values.
Article
Full-text available
I argue that the state of boredom (i.e., the transitory and non-pathological experience of boredom) should be understood to be a regulatory psychological state that has the capacity to promote our well-being by contributing to personal growth and to the construction (or reconstruction) of a meaningful life.
Article
Full-text available
We report new evidence on the emotional, demographic, and situational correlates of boredom from a rich experience sample capturing 1.1 million emotional and time-use reports from 3,867 U.S. adults. Subjects report boredom in 2.8% of the 30-min sampling periods, and 63% of participants report experiencing boredom at least once across the 10-day sampling period. We find that boredom is more likely to co-occur with negative, rather than positive, emotions, and is particularly predictive of loneliness, anger, sadness, and worry. Boredom is more prevalent among men, youths, the unmarried, and those of lower income. We find that differences in how such demographic groups spend their time account for up to one third of the observed differences in overall boredom. The importance of situations in predicting boredom is additionally underscored by the high prevalence of boredom in specific situations involving monotonous or difficult tasks (e.g., working, studying) or contexts where one's autonomy might be constrained (e.g., time with coworkers, afternoons, at school). Overall, our findings are consistent with cognitive accounts that cast boredom as emerging from situations in which engagement is difficult, and are less consistent with accounts that exclusively associate boredom with low arousal or with situations lacking in meaning. (PsycINFO Database Record
Article
Full-text available
Boredom is a ubiquitous human experience that can best be described as an inability to engage with one's environment despite the motivation to do so. Boredom is perceived as a negative experience and demonstrates strong associations with other negatively valenced states including depression and aggression. Although boredom has been shown to be elevated in neurological and psychiatric illnesses, little is known about the neural underpinnings of the state. We scanned the brains of healthy participants under four separate conditions: a resting state scan, a sustained attention task and two video-based mood inductions, one known to produce boredom and another we validated to produce a state of interest or engagement. Using independent components analyses, results showed common regions of correlated activation in posterior regions of the so-called default mode network (DMN) of the brain across all four conditions. The sustained attention and boredom induction scans were differentiated from the resting state scan by the presence of anticorrelated activity-i.e. when DMN regions were active, this region was deactivated-in the anterior insula cortex. This same region demonstrated correlated activity with both the DMN and the regions associated with attentional control during the interest mood induction. We interpret these findings to suggest that boredom represents a failure to engage executive control networks when faced with a monotonous task-in other words, when the task demands some level of engagement (watch the movie, search for infrequent targets), but is so mundane that attempts to do so fail.
Article
Full-text available
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often presents with co-morbid depression and elevated levels of boredom. We explored the relationship between boredom and depression in a group of mild (n = 38), moderate-to-severe TBI patients (n = 14) and healthy controls (n = 88), who completed the Beck Depression Inventory and Boredom Proneness Scales as part of a larger study. Results showed that the relationship between boredom and depression was strongest in moderate-to-severe TBI patients. We explored two boredom proneness factors that index an individual's need for external or internal stimulation. Results indicated that the need for external stimulation was the critical driver in the relation between boredom and depression. Once again, this relationship was strongest in the moderate-to-severe TBI group. These results suggest that one common factor underlying boredom and depression is the need for stimulation from the external environment and, presumably, a failure to satisfy that need-a disconnection felt most strongly in moderate-to-severe TBI.
Article
Full-text available
Boredom is frequently considered inconsequential and has received relatively little research attention. We argue that boredom has important implications for human functioning, based on emotion theory and empirical evidence. Specifically, we argue that boredom motivates pursuit of new goals when the previous goal is no longer beneficial. Exploring alternate goals and experiences allows the attainment of goals that might be missed if people fail to reengage. Similar to other discrete emotions, we propose that boredom has specific and unique impacts on behavior, cognition, experience and physiology. Consistent with a broader argument that boredom encourages the behavioral pursuit of alternative goals, we argue that, while bored, attention to the current task is reduced, the experience of boredom is negative and aversive, and that boredom increases autonomic arousal to ready the pursuit of alternatives. By motivating desire for change from the current state, boredom increases opportunities to attain social, cognitive, emotional and experiential stimulation that could have been missed. We review the limited extant literature to support these claims, and call for more experimental boredom research.
Article
Full-text available
Our central goal is to provide a definition of boredom in terms of the underlying mental processes that occur during an instance of boredom. Through the synthesis of psychodynamic, existential, arousal, and cognitive theories of boredom, we argue that boredom is universally conceptualized as "the aversive experience of wanting, but being unable, to engage in satisfying activity." We propose to map this conceptualization onto underlying mental processes. Specifically, we propose that boredom be defined in terms of attention. That is, boredom is the aversive state that occurs when we (a) are not able to successfully engage attention with internal (e.g., thoughts or feelings) or external (e.g., environmental stimuli) information required for participating in satisfying activity, (b) are focused on the fact that we are not able to engage attention and participate in satisfying activity, and (c) attribute the cause of our aversive state to the environment. We believe that our definition of boredom fully accounts for the phenomenal experience of boredom, brings existing theories of boredom into dialogue with one another, and suggests specific directions for future research on boredom and attention. © The Author(s) 2012.
Article
Full-text available
This article reports the development, validation, and correlates of a self-report measure of boredom proneness. The 28-item Boredom Proneness (BP) Scale demonstrates satisfactory levels of internal consistency (coefficient alpha = .79) and test-retest reliability (r = .83) over a 1-week interval. Evidence of validity for the BP is supported by correlations with other boredom measures and from a set of studies evaluating interest and attention in the classroom. Other hypothesized relationships with boredom were tested, with significant positive associations found with depression, hopelessness, perceived effort, loneliness, and amotivational orientation. Additional findings indicate boredom proneness to be negatively related to life satisfaction and autonomy orientation. The relationship of boredom to other affective states is discussed, and directions for future research are outlined.
Article
Boredom has recently piqued cognitive neuroscientific interest, but remains a challenge to scientific investigation in this field. We propose that to advance this research, we should (i) seek greater consistency of operationalization and measurement across studies and participants; and (ii) appreciate the temporal instability of boredom and its ensuing dynamics.