- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Urban Ecosystems
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
The role of woodpeckers (family: Picidae) as ecosystem engineers
in urban parks: a case study in the city of Madrid (Spain)
Patricia Catalina-Allueva
1
&Carlos A. Martín
1
Accepted: 14 December 2020
#The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Many species of the family Picidae, such as the woodpeckers, excavate the tree-cavities where they nest. Frequently the cavities
are used during a single breeding season and subsequently abandoned, which allows their use by non-excavator species for
nesting or roosting. Here we analyze the role of woodpeckers as providers of nesting and refuge places in two urban parks in the
city of Madrid. The environmental characteristics of the woodpecker nest-sites were also studied. Prior to the breeding season 75
trees bearing woodpecker-excavated cavities and 142 control trees (i.e. without woodpecker cavities) were located,
georeferenced and characterized by a set of variables relative to the tree and its environment. During the breeding season the
cavities were monitored with an endoscopic camera to verify occupation and user identity. Additionally, 71 non-excavated tree-
cavities were monitored to measuretheir occupancy and make comparisons with those excavated by woodpeckers. Woodpeckers
showed a strong preference for trees of the genus Populus: 54 of 75 (72%) woodpecker-cavities were in poplars, which
comprised only 7–10% of available trees. The excavated cavities were found mainly in the trunk of the trees, north oriented
and away from paths. The occupancy rate by bird species was higher, although not significantly, for excavated cavities than for
natural cavities (36.0% and 23.9% respectively). The richness and composition of cavity-user species also differed between types
of tree-cavities. This work shows the importance of woodpeckers as providers of nesting and refuge places for other cavity-user
birds and highlights their role as ecosystem engineers in urban parks. Finally, we consider that these results can guide biodiversity
conservation efforts in urban planning.
Keywords Cavity-nesting .Endoscopic camera .Excavator species .Keystone species .Nest-site selection .Secondary cavity
users
Introduction
In ecosystems there are species that show a great influence on
ecological processes, affecting a large number of both animal
and plant species and the interactions that occur between
them. These species are called keystone species because they
play a fundamental role, above their abundance or biomass, in
the maintenance of the ecological system to which they be-
long (Paine 1969; Mills et al. 1993; Tellería 2012). Frequently
keystone species are also ecosystem engineers as they physi-
cally modify or create habitat characteristics and provide crit-
ical ecological resources for other species, thereby affecting
their presence and abundance (Jones et al. 1994;Wrightand
Jones 2002).
Woodpeckers (family Picidae) are considered keystone
species and ecosystem engineers because with their excava-
tion activities, they create a variety of potential niches for
other organisms (Daily et al. 1993; Jones et al. 1994; Floyd
and Martin 2016). Thus, cavities excavated by woodpeckers
are used by other bird species, mammals and invertebrates for
nesting, resting or sheltering from predators or inclement
weather (Wiebe 2006; Aitken and Martin 2007; Myczko
et al. 2016). Additionally, through their excavation activities
associated with nesting and foraging, woodpeckers accelerate
decomposition cycles of forests, increasing the recycling of
nutrients, facilitating the dispersion of wood-decaying fungi
and intervening in the control of insects (Winkler et al. 1995;
Farris et al. 2004;Faytetal.2005; Drapeau et al. 2009).
*Patricia Catalina-Allueva
biopatcat@gmail.com
Carlos A. Martín
ca.martin@bio.ucm.es
1
Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, C/ José Antonio Novais, 12,
28040 Madrid, Spain
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01087-y
/ Published online: 3 January 2021
Urban Ecosystems (2021) 24:863–871
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.