ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This research study attempts to explore the effect of a trade war between the United States of America and China on Pakistan and other regional countries exports to the United States of America. The difference-in-difference methodology used to obtain the coefficients of each country to estimate the change in exports to the US from China, India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. The empirical results indicate that due to the imposition of US tariffs, China�s exports to the US reduced by 39%, whereas Pakistan�s exports to the US lowered by 3%. India and Bangladesh, on the other hand, gains from the trade war with India�s exports increased by 39% and Bangladesh�s exports increased by 50%. Therefore, it can conclude that the US-China trade war does not bring positivity to overall Pakistan�s trade position.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Citation: Keeryo, Z. A., Mumtaz, J., & Lakhan, A. B. (2020). US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan
Exports. Global Economics Review, V(III), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2020(V-III).01
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/ger.2020(V-III).01
Pages: 1 – 10
DOI: 10.31703/ger.2020(V-III).01
p-ISSN: 2521-2974
e-ISSN: 2707-0093
L-ISSN: 2521-2974
Vol. V, No. III (Summer 2020)
US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan
Exports
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo *
Jazib Mumtaz
Allah Bux Lakhan
This research study attempts to explore the effect of a trade war between the United
States of America and China on Pakistan and other regional countries exports to
the United States of America. The difference-in-difference methodology used to obtain the
coefficients of each country to estimate the change in exports to the US from China, India,
Bangladesh, and Pakistan. The empirical results indicate that due to the imposition of US
tariffs, China’s exports to the US reduced by 39%, whereas Pakistan’s exports to the US lowered
by 3%. India and Bangladesh, on the other hand, gains from the trade war with India’s exports
increased by 39% and Bangladesh’s exports increased by 50%. Therefore, it can conclude that
the US-China trade war does not bring positivity to overall Pakistan’s trade position.
Key Words: Trade War, trade diversion; tariffs, United States; China; Pakistan
JEL Classification:
Introduction: Pakistan, China, and US Trade Relation
In rising agitation between the US and China, Pakistan seeks to maintain good
relationships with both countries. The government of Pakistan clarified that our future
is bound to China regarding the economic development of the country. He further
stressed that we are lucky to have such friends who always extended support not only
for the economy of Pakistan but also stood with us in every international challenge
which Pakistan is being faced. On the other hand, the US remained strategically and
the largest source of foreign aid by the provision of millions of dollars in military and
civilian support against the prolonged war on terror in the region.
Simultaneously, two challenges emerged in recent periods. Taliban and US peace
accord, pinpointing to an end to US engagement in the conflict which impacted seriously
on the trade relations of said countries. Meanwhile, China has increased its investment
in Pakistan. In the perspective of defence and security, China always wanted good
relation with Pakistan and consequently different investments in military exercises to
combat the international security challenges. Historically, China’s economic working is
*
Ex. Economic Growth Advisor, Research and Training Wing, Department of Planning and
Development, Government of Sindh, Sindh, Pakistan. Email: zakeconomist@gmail.com
PhD Scholar, Department of Social Sciences (Economics), Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Institute of Science and Technology, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
PhD Scholar, Department of Economics, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh,
Pakistan.
Abstract
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo, Jazib Mumtaz and Allah Bux Lakhan
Page | 2 Global Economics Review (GER)
appreciable on the global belt and road initiative (BRI) that is wanted to plan to open
the new trade corridors in central and south Asia. The estimates crossed about 30 billion
dollars on the basis of bilateral cooperation as a part of China, Pakistan economic
corridors (CPEC) which improved Pakistan’s infrastructure plan. In addition to this,
China has worked to remove the grave problem of energy crisis in the shape of initiating
the different project.
US has criticized the investments of China related to CPEC by blaming that China
is only to earn its own economic targets by ignoring foreign countries' concerns, and it is
nothing rather than debt trap. China and Pakistan rejected the baseless criticism on the
economic, political and social cooperation of both countries. The incumbent government
of Pakistan tries on every forum to rebuild the relationship with the US to deescalate
the ongoing tension between the two powers.
The trades between Pakistan-US have a great history of agreements overtime on
the basis of immediate reforms and sustainable working. The Doha trade and WTO
agreements are solid evidence of cooperation for both countries. The trade policy
suggests more working in both countries on the basis of trade liberalization and free
trade agreements. Historically, between both countries, political relations have
dominated economic and social ties. The episode of partnership is also a valid response
of relation for both countries in the context of trade relations.
9/11 diplomacy strengthen the working and bonding of both countries. The bilateral
aid packages and support of international financial institutions increase the relations
between both countries. The said economies also signed a trade and investment
framework agreement in 2004, and that remained a successful model for both countries.
In addition to this, there is also a geopolitical alliance of US-Pak historically, and there
is a solid history of free trade agreements and investment for both countries. The
working of these countries is also found success in the ford foundation and GE
foundation on different projects.
Trump administration sustained cooperation with Pakistan to face the challenge of
COVID-19 which drastically changed the economic scenario and in relaxing loan
payments through the support of the International monitory fund, apart from that
Pakistan government also developed ties with the US and got successful support in
improving its credentials with FATF and levelling best to come out from the grey list.
US administration joined and lauded Pakistan over the stability of region and Pakistan
should be self-sustained by taking different steps against terrorism on the larger
interest world.
The trade liberalization is unavoidable for China and Pakistan for the development
of both countries as according to WTO conditions member countries are free to join trade
agreements for the diversion of trade. Trade is very necessary due to different economic
and political structures. Different countries have different specialization in goods and
services. Pakistan is also trying to set the directions of trade policies actively since last
two decades. Bilateral relation between China and Pakistan is not only beneficial for the
region but also for the development of the world economy. Good economic and political
working is very necessary for the growth and development of any nation as we know
that the export competitiveness of countries is increasing at very high speed on the basis
of new technology and innovation. China is a very good position in emerging economies
in the aspect of revolutionary policies and comparative advantages patterns at local and
US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan Exports
Vol. V, No. III (Summer 2020) Page | 3
international level. Pakistan has a dire need and strong potential for fast growth in the
socio-economic position of modernization and to remove hindrances for the advancement
of the economy.
Pakistan and China share borders and cordial relationship to make the bond strong
on free trade agreement since 2006 and 2007. The deal is based on two phases, one from
2006 to 2012 and another phase started in 2013 and yet going on. On the conditions of
two different economies, the growth of world trade is different for both economies
individually because China has more relative competitiveness. China has given many
opportunities to Pakistan regarding tariff concessions, flexible exchange rate,
favourable pricing, variety of products and services and high custom relief. China has
made many commandments with Pakistan to decrease the US influence in the region.
Major share of fruits of investment will be spent on transportation, infrastructure and
energy that will create a positive impact on sustainable growth, alleviating poverty,
inflation challenges and fostering technological innovation. No doubt, China is providing
a reasonable timing to negotiate the terms and condition for free trade agreements to
benefit both economies. In contradiction to this, the US have some strict conditions for
the economy of Pakistan. Speaking from Pakistan trade side there should be
renegotiations for agreement with the US because the largest share of imports is still
dependent on our economy. On the other hand, different products from Pakistan top
exports are imported by China from the world, and Pakistan does not get its foundation
in China’s market due to a lack of quality standards. China has also created many
threats for Pakistan industries from semi-products to final products in different
industries.
US and China
President Donald J. Trump, who before becoming president of the US, was continuously
criticizing China’s trade practices. In this regard, he gave several statements, i.e. on 21st
September 2011, he tweeted that China is neither an ally nor a friend they want to
beat us and own our country. Another statement he gave on 2nd May 2017, while
campaigning for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, said we could not
continue to allow China to rape our country and that's what they are doing. It is the
greatest theft in the history of the world (China Briefing, 2014). However, in between
2011 and in January 2017 many times talks held between two countries (US and China)
regarding resolving the trade differences, and the Chinese president visited Trump’s
Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, both were agreed to set up a hundred Day Action Plan, to
some extent, they were agreed, and their tension relaxed, but once again this tension
raised when both countries imposed tariff against each other in 2018. On 23rd March
2018, the United States imposed a 25% tariff on all steel imports except from a few
countries, i.e. Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and South Korea, and a 10% tariff on all
aluminium imports except from two countries namely Argentina and Australia.
Similarly, on the very next month April 02, 2018, China reacted and, imposed tariffs in
between 15% to 25% on 128 products including fruit, wine, seamless steel pipes, pork,
and recycled aluminium of (worth US$3 billion) in revenge to the US’ steel and
aluminium.
Furthermore, the trade dispute between the two countries further deepened when
the United States imposed an additional 25 % tariff on imports from China. The amount
of tariff imposed from China has a value of dollar 50 billion in July and August at the
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo, Jazib Mumtaz and Allah Bux Lakhan
Page | 4 Global Economics Review (GER)
ratio of dollar 34 and dollar 16 billion in July and August 2018 simultaneously, from
which the share of imports of the USA is dollar 50 billion. China imposed an extra
amount of dollar 60 billion on US imports from which the USA amounted to 10 per cent
taxation on China’s imports at 10 per cent share, which becomes 25 per cent in January
2019 which was completed in May 2019. In addition to this, there is a blockage of
exchange in December 2018 and May 2019 as after the G20 summit in June 2019. It can
be clarified that the span of 2018 and 2019 will be to encourage the incremental values
(Ken Itakura, 2020). The people of America had voted for Donald Trump with the
intention that he would bring reforms in each sector and make strong foreign relations
with the world countries, but despite making good relation with world countries, he
started the war and took actions against Russia, Turkey, Iran, India and EU (China
Briefing, 2014) which has adversely damage trade, investment and diplomatic relations
with world countries generally and China particularly by sanctioned tariffs on solar
panels, steel, aluminium, etc., from most trading countries and, imposed series of duties
on Chines goods. The Chinese government responded it, leading to the trade war. In this
regard, several research studies have also been conducted, i.e. (Amiti et al. 2019, 2020;
Cavallo et al. 2019) said the tariffs that have been imposed by the President of the
United States on China its cost is bearded by the consumers and financial units in the
USA. Another study was conducted by (Fajgelbaum et al. 2020) found that due to tariffs,
the US has bearded a welfare loss of 51 billion US dollars. Jim Rogers co-founder of the
Quantum Fund and Investment guru says trade wars are always bad for everyone
(Dawn, 2018). Kerry Liu (2020) analyzed the impact of the China and US trade war on
Chinese currency (Renminbi), bilateral trade, and stock markets by using google trends
data from January 2018 to December 2019, found that there is no effect on Chinese
goods trade surplus whereas has reduced the imports of US goods. Secondly, it found
that war affects sales and profit.
Pakistan and the US-China Trade War
As Pakistan is the most important partner of both countries because it is maintaining
its sustainable relations with both nations since its existence? Due to sustainable
relations with both countries, China launched a big financial project (CPEC) of US 46
billion dollars in 2013, and now it has reached approximately 70 billion US dollars.
Whereas, the United States imports a lot from Pakistan. In 2019-20 (July-March),
Pakistan exports to the US was Rs. 471 billion, whereas exports to China in the same
period of time were Rs. 219 billion, whereas Pakistan imports from the USA were Rs.
692.6 billion, whereas imports from China was Rs. 1394.3 billion (Economic Survey of
Pakistan, 2020). Osama Rizvi an economic and geopolitical analyst says, for Pakistan,
this economic tussle between the two largest economies is very significant because both
nations are one of Pakistan’s largest trading partners (Propakistani, 2019). He further
says Pakistan is diplomatically engaged with China in the firm of CPEC which has a
large benefit for Pakistan. Pakistani business community leaders say that the trade war
between the world two largest economies (the USA and China) could be benefited for
Pakistan. In present circumstances, Pakistan has an opportunity to renegotiate the
terms of future investment and bilateral trade of China with Pakistan. Pakistan
Business Council Chief Executive Officer says Pakistan has become more competitive
than China in some areas such as textiles. Paul D. Miller (2012) says that the US and
Pakistan trade links have been growing over the past decade, Pakistan needs America
US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan Exports
Vol. V, No. III (Summer 2020) Page | 5
as a trading partner more than the US needs Pakistan, in 2003 both countries singed
bilateral Trade and Investment Agreement through which bilateral trade increased
from US$2.8 billion in 2001 to US$5. 8 billion in 2011. In 2010, the US was the top
destination for Pakistan exports. In addition, he says Pakistani workers in the US
contribute a sizeable portion of the US$8.7 billion in remittances to Pakistan from the
US and, in return American businesses account for US$517 million of FDI in Pakistan,
almost one-quarter of the total. If Pakistan fails to maintain such sustainable relations
with the US than bilateral trade ties between both countries could be slow.
Objective of the Study
This research study attempts to explore that this trade war between the United States
of America and China offer an opportunity for Pakistan to boost its exports to the United
States of America and attract foreign direct investment from both countries into
Pakistan.
Bilateral trade position of Pakistan and the United States
According to the economic survey of Pakistan (2020), United States is the Pakistan
major trading partner, and it is the number one destination for Pakistan’s exports. The
US had developed a system of preferences to encourage economic growth in Developing
and Least developed countries. However, the US had included 134 tariff lines of
Pakistan in its GSP scheme in 2017 and, now it has further renewed till December 2020.
In addition, the trade balance between the two countries has also increased since 2017.
In 2017, Pakistan exports to the United States was US$3, 565,800 thousand, Imports
US$2,846,399 thousand and trade balance US$719,401 whereas, in 2019, Pakistan
exports to the United States increased and reached at US3,826,257-dollar imports
US2,957,855 dollar and trade balance US$868,402. It has been noticed that bilateral
trade between Pakistan and the United States has remained in favour of Pakistan, and
it is also expected that this trade will also remain in favour of Pakistan. The following
table depicts the position of bilateral trade from 2017 to 2019.
Table 1. Bilateral Trade Position between Pakistan and the United States US Dollar
Thousand
Year
Exports
Imports
Balance of
Trade
Total
Exports of
Pakistan
% Share in
Total
Exports
Total
Imports of
Pakistan
% Share in
Total
Imports
2017
3,565,800
2,846,399
719,401
21,911,598
16.3
57,518,651
4.95
2018
3,826,257
2,957,855
868,402
23,778,621
16.1
60,391,133
4.89
2019
4,042,271
2,614,705
1,427,566
23,818,817
17.0
50,134,812
5.21
Source: Trade Map
Role of Pakistan and the US in Each Other's Exports and Imports
The following table depicts the role of bilateral trade between the US and Pakistan. It
shows that percent share of Pakistan in US’s exports was 16.27 in 2017 which increased
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo, Jazib Mumtaz and Allah Bux Lakhan
Page | 6 Global Economics Review (GER)
up to 17 percent in 2019, and percent share of Pakistan’s in US’s imports was 4.95 in
2017 which also increased and reached at 5.21 percent in 2019 whereas, percent share
of US in Pakistan’s exports was 0.18 percent which has decreased in 2019 and reached
at 0.16 percent, and percent share of US in Pakistan’s imports was 0.16 in 2017 and has
remained same in 2019. This up and down in percent share has noted due to the US and
China trade war.
Table 2. Role of Pakistan and the US in Each Other's Exports and Imports
Year
% Share
of Pakistan in
US's Exports
% Share of US in
Pakistan's
Exports
% Share of the
US in Pakistan's
Imports
2017
16.27
0.18
0.16
2018
16.09
0.17
0.15
2019
17.00
0.16
0.16
Source: World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS)
Global trade profile of Pakistan and US
The following table shows the position of the share of Pakistan and USA in world trade
of last three years (2017-2019). In 2017, Pakistan exports share was 0.125 which almost
remain the same in 2019, imports share decreased from 0.323 to 0.263 in 2019, and total
trade also decreased from 0.225 to 0.196 in 2019 whereas, the US share of trade in world
trade depicts the same position from 2017 to 2019.
Table 3. Share of Pakistan and US in World Trade (2017-2019)
Year
Pakistan
US
Exports
Imports
Total
Trade
Exports
Imports
Total
Trade
2017
0.125
0.323
0.225
8.81
13.52
11.18
2018
0.123
0.306
0.215
8.63
13.27
10.97
2019
0.127
0.263
0.196
8.79
13.48
11.16
Source: International Trade Centre (ITC)
Bilateral trade position of Pakistan and China
The second phase of the Pakistan and China Free Trade Agreement has implemented,
and it is a significant achievement for both countries, but more particularly in Pakistan.
Now, Pakistan can increase its market access in the Chinese market like ASEAN. Under
this phase, China included 313 more products of Pakistan. However, in the past, the
bilateral trade has remained in favour of China, but now it is expected that due to the
second phase of PCFTA, the trade deficit of Pakistan will decrease. The following table
shows the position of Pakistan and China bilateral trade.
US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan Exports
Vol. V, No. III (Summer 2020) Page | 7
Table 4. Bilateral Trade Position between Pakistan and China US Dollar Thousand
Year
Exports
Imports
Balance of
Trade
Total
Exports
of
Pakistan
% Share
in Total
Exports
Total
Imports of
Pakistan
% Share
in Total
Imports
2017
1,510,410
15,404,325
-13,893,915
21,911,598
6.89
57,518,651
26.78
2018
1,829,435
14,599,749
-12,770,314
23,778,621
7.69
60,391,133
24.17
2019
2,042,893
12,423,997
-10,381,104
23,818,817
8.58
50,134,812
24.78
Source: Trade Map
Role of Pakistan and China in Each Other's Exports and Imports
The following table depicts the role of bilateral trade between China and Pakistan. It
shows that percent share of Pakistan in China’s exports was 6.89 in 2017 which
increased up to 8.58 percent in 2019, and percent share of Pakistan’s in China’s imports
was 26.78 in 2017 which decreased and reached at 24.78 percent in 2019 whereas,
percent share of China in Pakistan’s exports was 0.81 percent which has decreased in
2019 and reached at 0.65 percent, and percent share of China in Pakistan’s imports was
0.10 in 2017 and has also decreased in 2019 and reached at 0.09 percent. This up and
down in percent share has noted due to the US and China trade war.
Table 5. Role of Pakistan and China in Each Other's Exports and Imports
Year
% share
of Pakistan in
China’s
Exports
% share
of Pakistan in
China's
Imports
% share of
China in
Pakistan's
Exports
% share of
China in
Pakistan's
Imports
2017
6.89
26.78
0.81
0.10
2018
7.69
24.18
0.68
0.10
2019
8.58
24.78
0.65
0.09
Source: World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS)
Global Trade Profile of Pakistan and China
The following table shows the position of share of Pakistan and China in world trade of
last three years (2017-2019). In 2017, Pakistan exports share was 0.125 which almost
remain the same in 2019, imports share decreased from 0.323 to 0.263 in 2019, and total
trade also decreased from 0.225 to 0.196 in 2019 whereas, the China share of trade in
world trade has improved in the same period of time.
Table 6. Share of Pakistan and China in World Trade (2017-2019)
Year
Pakistan
China
Exports
Imports
Total Trade
Exports
Imports
Total Trade
2017
0.125
0.323
.225
12.93
10.35
11.63
2018
0.123
0.306
0.215
12.91
10.85
11.87
2019
0.127
0.263
0.196
13.35
10.86
12.10
Source: International Trade Centre (ITC)
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo, Jazib Mumtaz and Allah Bux Lakhan
Page | 8 Global Economics Review (GER)
Net Foreign Direct Investment from the U.S and China to Pakistan
The government of Pakistan has taken very concrete steps to enhance the Foreign Direct
Investment in the country. Thus, Pakistan improved Ease of Doing Business Rank from
136 to 108 in the year 2019. In addition, the government has announced various
invectives at a national and international level to attract the FDI, and it is providing a
business-friendly environment, especially in Special Economic Zone. However, FDI from
the US and China to Pakistan is depicted in the following table.
Table 7. Net Direct Investment from the United States and China into Pakistan
(US$ Million)
Year
United States of America
People’s Republic of China
2016-17
45.7
763.2
2017-18
161.7
1,311.9
2018-19
88.1 (Jul-Jun FY19 (R))
130.8 (Jul-Jun FY19 (R)
Source: Board of Investment
Data
The United States of America phased in tariffs/duties on the People’s Republic of China
exports in four series. In the beginning, US tariffed 34 billion dollars of Chinese exports
on 6th July 2018 (List No. 1), 16 billion dollars on 23rd August 2018 (List No. 2), 200
billion dollars on 24th September 2018 (List No. 3) and 120 billion dollars on 1st
September 2019 (List No.4). These four lists of goods have been collected from Sandler,
Travis and Rosenberg Trade Report. Whereas, the export data have been collected from
the International Trade Commission’s DataWeb.
Methods
For each country, the following difference-in-difference equation is estimated:
𝑦!" = 𝛼 +
%
𝛽#𝐼(𝑙!)
$
#%&
+
%
𝛾'𝐼(𝑝")
$
'%&
+
%
𝛿#'𝐼(𝑙!) 𝐼(𝑝")
$
#,'%&
+𝜏"+
%
𝜏#𝐼(𝑙!)
$
#%&
+𝜀!"
Where
𝑦!"
is the 2019 dollar value of exports to US of an HTS 8-digit good,
𝐼(𝑙!)
are
indicators for the control group,
𝐼(𝑝")
are indicators for the post-implementation period,
and
𝛿#'
are the difference-in-difference parameters for each control group. Also, to
account for non-parallel time trends across groups, it includes linear time trends for
each list (
𝜏"+
𝜏𝐼(𝑙!)
#%&
). As recommended by Yotov et al. (2016), regressions are
estimated using Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) method (Santos Silvaand
Tenreyro 2006, 2011).
Results & Discussion
Table 8 presents the difference-in-difference coefficients for US exports by China,
Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. U.S. tariffs against China lower Chinese exports of
tariffed goods by 39%. Pakistan’s exports to US lowered by 3%, whereas exports of India
increased by 39% and Bangladesh by 50%.
US-China Trade War and its Impact on Pakistan Exports
Vol. V, No. III (Summer 2020) Page | 9
Table 8. Difference-in-Difference Effect of U.S. Tariffs on Exports to the U.S
Country
Δ
P-Value
N
R2
China
-0.3862***
0.0001
144
0.9201
Pakistan
-0.0269***
0.0012
0.1839
India
0.3938***
0.0023
0.0123
Bangladesh
0.5033***
0.0011
0.1926
Robust standard errors level in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Conclusion
As the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China are good friends of
the Pakistan since its existence. But, due to recent trade war between USA and PRC,
Pakistan trade has also affected. It has been empirically witnessed that due to U.S.
tariffs against China lower Chinese exports of tariffed goods by 39%. Pakistan’s exports
to US lowered by 3%, whereas exports of India increased by 39% and Bangladesh by
50%. Therefore, this war has badly affected Pakistan trade with the US.
Zulfiqar Ali Keeryo, Jazib Mumtaz and Allah Bux Lakhan
Page | 10 Global Economics Review (GER)
Reference
Amiti, M, S.J.Redding, & D.E. Weinstein. (2019). The Impact of the 2018 Trade War: A
Longer-run Perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 187-210.
Board of Investment. (2020). Foreign Investment Trend.https://invest.gov.pk/statistics
Borchert, I. and Yotov, Y. V. (2016), ‘Globalization and International Trade’, manuscript.
Cavallo, Alberto, Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman, & Jenny Tang. (n.d.). Tariff Pass
through at the Border and the Stor: Evidence from US Trade Policy. NBER
Working Paper.
China Briefing. (2014, December). The US-China Trade War Reaches a Truce: China
Market Lessons to Learn. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/us-china-trade-
war-reaches-truce-china-market-lessons-learn/
Dawn. (2018, July 11). What’s on everyone’s mind in China-US trade war.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1419321
Economic Survey of Pakistan. (2020). Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20. Islamabad:
Ministry of Finance.
Fajgelbaum, P. D., P. K. Goldberg, P. J. Kennedy, and A. K. Khandelwal (2020): “The
Return to Protectionism,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135, 155.1
Itakura, K. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of the USChina Trade War. Asian Economic
Policy Review, 77-93.
Liu, K. (2020). The effects of the ChinaUS trade war during 20182019 on the Chinese
economy: an initial assessment. Economic and Political Studies.
Propakistani. (2019, December). End of US-China Trade War: What’s in it For Pakistan?
https://propakistani.pk/2020/01/16/end-of-us-china-trade-war-whats-in-it-for-
pakistan/
Silva, S. J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S. 2006. The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and
Statistics 88(4), 641-658.
Silva, S. J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S. 2011. Further Simulation Evidence on the Performance
of the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Economics Letters
112(2), 220-222.
Trade Map. (2020). Bilateral trade between Pakistan and China: Product: TOTAL All
products. https://www.trademap.org/Bilateral_TS.aspx?nvpm=1
... India and Bangladesh, on the other hand, benefited from the trade war, with a surge in exports of 39% and 50%, respectively. (Keeryo et al., 2020) Overall, there are many differences between China and Pakistan in terms of the current agricultural situation. Although there are some commonalities between the two countries, such as large population and abundant labor force, the agricultural development status of the two countries is quite different due to their different national conditions and historical and cultural backgrounds. ...
Article
This article aims to examine the China-US strategic competition and its impacts on agricultural cooperation between the two powers. Over the past two decades, China`s comprehensive influence across the world has challenged the US hegemony that it has held for three decades. The US perceives China`s persistent economic growth and diplomatic influence as the main challenge to its supremacy in the world. The strategic competition between the two powers has also resulted in a trade war in recent years. China has been one of the top trading partners for the past two decades. Since, the early 2000s, China has been one of the main countries for the US for its agriculture exports. In the same way, the US remains to be an important destination for Chinese agricultural exports. The China-US strategic game not only caused a consequential distraction to the agricultural trade, but it also had direct negative impacts on the economies of the two countries. This article finds that agriculture is a key area of China-US trade relations and that the strategic competition between the two powers has direct implications for the agricultural sector. The findings of this research also revealed that the US-China trade war has hindered agriculture cooperation, and has implications for Ukraine and Pakistan as well.
... While the US trade war has had no effect on China's goods, Pakistan has been playing a key role in maintaining a lasting relationship with China and the United States. According to the data of 2019 and 2020, Pakistan's exports to the United States were 441 billion rupees and to China 219 billion rupees and Pakistan's imports from the United States were 692.6 billion and about 1394.3 billion from China (Lakhan, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
The United States and China had been in an economic rivalry since quite long. The United States, contemporary superpower of the world, gained independence from Britain and since the Second Industrial Revolution; it has made significant economic progress due to which it has dominated the world largely. On the other hand, China’s economic growth begun in 1978 as it established good trade relations with foreign countries. After the disintegration of USSR a new cold war emerged between China and US. In order to boost its economic growth China initiated its Belt and Road initiative in 2013, and through this project China sought to connect itself with Asian countries through sea and roads. In order to counter this project US signed the Blue Dot Network. Moreover, this great power rivalry has a significant impacts on Pakistan's economy which is thoroughly discussed in this research. . The study has also explored the emergence of US-China rivalry and has focused on the fact that how China’s growing economy is a threat to the US. Moreover, the data collected is qualitative based on secondary sources.
... Despite political differences with the US during the Cold War and after 9/11, Pakistan has consistently emphasised economic pragmatism in its dealings with both China and the US since its independence. Although the US is Pakistan's main trading partner and receives 17% of its exports, Pakistan's trade with China is only 8%, but it is increasing due to Chinese investments made under the CPEC projects (Keeryo, Mumtaz, & Lakhan, 2020). In each case, Pakistan's economic considerations infl uenced its strategies for developing economic relationships with both China and the US. ...
... Despite its size, India has only managed to increase its global export share by more than half a percentage point since 2000 (Misra & Choudhry, 2020); Pakistan's share has remained constant for the last 35 years (Keeryo, Mumtaz, & Lakhan, 2020); and Indonesia's share has fallen since 2000 (Wangke, 2020). In contrast, Myanmar and Sri Lanka are relatively small players on the global stage (Wijayasiri & Wijesinha, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
China has been losing international competitiveness in labor‐intensive industries due to various factors, including the trade war with the United States and globalization. Vietnam, however, has rapidly expanded its labor‐intensive exports. The paper proposes to explore the future of labor‐intensive industries in Vietnam due to the U.S.‐China trade war. The paper examines export performance data from United Nation Comtrade for 10 specific labor‐intensive industries that serve the U.S. market between 2000 and 2020 to assess the possibility of Vietnam overtaking China's position as the world's largest manufacturer. Using situation analysis, the paper compares the competitive advantage of Vietnam in labor‐intensive industries due to the U.S.‐China trade war. The paper found that China's competitiveness was negatively impacted for the final two periods, while Vietnam's competitive advantage increased.
... According to Osama Rizvi, a financial analyst, this financial fight between the two largest economies is extremely important for Pakistan because both nations are some of Pakistan's most important trading allies. (Keeryo, Mumtaz & Lakhan, 2020) ASEAN has been impacted by the trade war, particularly in areas, for example, electronic products, considering that China is its top trading partner. Even though Changes in exchange designs as a result of the trade war can bring in relocated chances for ASEAN countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
In 2018, a trade war started between USA and China. Both the countries started to apply tariffs against each other. In March 2018, the USA applied tariffs on imports from China. Then in return, China also applied tariffs on a few products. With time, this trade war between both economies raised, and its further intensification made both countries suffer through imposed tariffs. Tariff wars between the United States and China have the potential to undermine global financial stability. As the world's biggest economies, China and USA have been merchandising products and services on a worldwide scale. After these countries retaliate,the tariff war will have an impact on the global distribution chain, international trade, the economy, and equity markets. The study is a qualitative-based critical analysis of the reasons and effects of this trade war between the two economic giants. It also explicitly highlights the environmental as well as economic impacts on the world community.
Article
Full-text available
The China–US trade war during 2018–2019 has attracted attentions from academics, policy makers, businesses and investors around the world. Unlike previous researches which are mainly based on hypothetical scenarios, this study looks at the real effects of the China–US trade war on the Chinese economy. Based on either weekly or monthly data during January 2018–December 2019 including creatively using the Google Trends data to measure the severity of the trade war, this study examines the effects of the China–US trade war on Chinese Renminbi, China–US bilateral trade and stock markets.
Article
Full-text available
We evaluate the impact of the US–China trade war using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of global trade. We conduct ex ante simulation analysis exploring three scenarios to understand how the trade war affects import tariffs, investment, and productivity. The escalation of the trade war reduces gross domestic product (GDP) in China and the USA by −1.41% and −1.35%, respectively. The trade war reduces nearly all sectoral imports and outputs in both countries. To reflect the important role of global value chains (GVCs), we modify the dynamic CGE model with agent‐specific import demands, and we explore the difference between the results for the two models relating to the trade war impacts on GDP and bilateral trade. When GVCs are accounted for, the negative impacts on bilateral trade are more widespread across countries, and world GDP in the modified model is reduced by −$US450 billion. These results suggest that the GVCs play substantial role in determining trade responses at the disaggregated level.
Article
We extend the simulation results in Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006, The log of gravity, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641-658) by considering a novel data-generating process. Our results confirm that the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator is generally well behaved, even when the proportion of zeros in the sample is very large.
Globalization and International Trade', manuscript. Cavallo, Alberto, Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman, & Jenny Tang. (n.d.). Tariff Pass through at the Border and the Stor: Evidence from US Trade Policy
  • I Yotov
Board of Investment. (2020). Foreign Investment Trend.https://invest.gov.pk/statistics Borchert, I. and Yotov, Y. V. (2016), 'Globalization and International Trade', manuscript. Cavallo, Alberto, Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman, & Jenny Tang. (n.d.). Tariff Pass through at the Border and the Stor: Evidence from US Trade Policy. NBER Working Paper.
The US-China Trade War Reaches a Truce: China Market Lessons to Learn
  • China Briefing
China Briefing. (2014, December). The US-China Trade War Reaches a Truce: China Market Lessons to Learn. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/us-china-tradewar-reaches-truce-china-market-lessons-learn/
What's on everyone's mind in China-US trade war
Dawn. (2018, July 11). What's on everyone's mind in China-US trade war. https://www.dawn.com/news/1419321
Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance
Economic Survey of Pakistan. (2020). Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance.
The Return to Protectionism
  • P D Fajgelbaum
  • P K Goldberg
  • P J Kennedy
Fajgelbaum, P. D., P. K. Goldberg, P. J. Kennedy, and A. K. Khandelwal (2020): "The Return to Protectionism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135, 1-55.1
End of US-China Trade War: What's in it For Pakistan?
  • Propakistani
Propakistani. (2019, December). End of US-China Trade War: What's in it For Pakistan? https://propakistani.pk/2020/01/16/end-of-us-china-trade-war-whats-in-it-forpakistan/