ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Objectives. To describe patterns of multimorbidity among fatal cases of COVID-19, and to propose a classification of patients based on age and multimorbidity patterns to begin the construction of etiological models. Methods. Data of Colombian confirmed deaths of COVID-19 until June 11, 2020, were included in this analysis (n=1488 deaths). Relationships between COVID-19, combinations of health conditions and age were explored using locally weighted polynomial regressions. Results. The most frequent health conditions were high blood pressure, respiratory disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disease. Dyads more frequents were high blood pressure with diabetes, cardiovascular disease or respiratory disease. Some multimorbidity patterns increase probability of death among older individuals, whereas other patterns are not age-related, or decrease the probability of death among older people. Not all multimorbidity increases with age, as is commonly thought. Obesity, alone or with other diseases, was associated with a higher risk of severity among young people, while the risk of the high blood pressure/diabetes dyad tends to have an inverted U distribution in relation with age. Conclusions. Classification of individuals according to multimorbidity in the medical management of COVID-19 patients is important to determine the possible etiological models and to define patient triage for hospitalization. Moreover, identification of non-infected individuals with high-risk ages and multimorbidity patterns serves to define possible interventions of selective confinement or special management.
Content may be subject to copyright.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N61
Pa
n American Jo
urnal
of Public Health
Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166 1
Original research
Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths:
proposal for the construction of etiological models
Julián A. Fernández-Niño,1 John A. Guerra-Gómez,2 y Alvaro J. Idrovo3
Suggested citation Fernández-Niño JA, Guerra-Gómez JA, Idrovo AJ. Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths: proposal for the con-
struction of etiological models. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e166. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited. No modications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specic organization
or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
1 Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. *  Julián A. Fernández-Niño,
aninoj@uninorte.edu.co
2 Northeastern University, Silicon Valley, United States of America
3 Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
ABSTRACT Objectives. To describe patterns of multimorbidity among fatal cases of COVID-19, and to propose a classifi-
cation of patients based on age and multimorbidity patterns to begin the construction of etiological models.
Methods. Data of Colombian confirmed deaths of COVID-19 until June 11, 2020, were included in this analysis
(n=1488 deaths). Relationships between COVID-19, combinations of health conditions and age were explored
using locally weighted polynomial regressions.
Results. The most frequent health conditions were high blood pressure, respiratory disease, diabetes, car-
diovascular disease, and kidney disease. Dyads more frequents were high blood pressure with diabetes,
cardiovascular disease or respiratory disease. Some multimorbidity patterns increase probability of death
among older individuals, whereas other patterns are not age-related, or decrease the probability of death
among older people. Not all multimorbidity increases with age, as is commonly thought. Obesity, alone or with
other diseases, was associated with a higher risk of severity among young people, while the risk of the high
blood pressure/diabetes dyad tends to have an inverted U distribution in relation with age.
Conclusions. Classification of individuals according to multimorbidity in the medical management of COVID-19
patients is important to determine the possible etiological models and to define patient triage for hospitaliza-
tion. Moreover, identification of non-infected individuals with high-risk ages and multimorbidity patterns serves
to define possible interventions of selective confinement or special management.
Keywords Betacoronavirus; multimorbidity; medical care; mortality; Colombia.
Currently, the practice of medicine is complex, and it is even
more so when faced with a new infection such as COVID-19.1
Scientic knowledge provides guidelines for having an effec-
tive medicine, but when people have chronic diseases, more
than one disease (co-occurrence), and receive several medicines,
clinical practice becomes an even bigger challenge, especially
when these chronic diseases do not receive adequate care.2 In
addition, conditions such as physical disability, mostly also as a
consequence of these chronic diseases, could also increase vul-
nerability to complications from other different diseases.
Evidence shows that multimorbidity is one of the clinical
characteristics that most complicates the care of infected peo-
ple,3 which is clearly true for COVID-19 as well. Valderas et al.4
dened multimorbidity as the “presence of multiple diseases
in one individual”, where comorbidity is just one of the possi-
ble forms of multimorbidity. For these authors comorbidity is
the “presence of additional diseases in relation to an index dis-
ease in one individual”; therefore, the co-occurrence of various
pre-existing diseases with COVID-19 infection is not necessarily
comorbidity. Multimorbidity among individuals with COVID-
19 was described early among the rst reported patients in the
specialized literature,5 and it is a frequent nding in published
studies.6,7 However, the term comorbidity continues to be used
incorrectly in most published studies. A critical reading of pre-
vious studies allows us to identify that, for the most of these.
The objective of this study was to explore the effect of single
diseases on the clinical severity or the risk of fatality among
patients with diagnosis of COVID-19. This leaves out more
Original research Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths
2 Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166
complex approaches such as those that congure vulnerability
of older adults as a construct beyond the effect of single dis-
eases or their simple sum. Therefore, it is necessary to study
multimorbidity as a multidimensional condition, which incor-
porates the joint presence and the interactions of all the health
conditions. A deeper analysis should emphasize the type of
potential relationships between health conditions, whether they
are under medical control or not, as well as other sources of
vulnerability such as disability, functional dependence on other
people, the presence of geriatric syndromes or even the social
and economic vulnerabilities, among others. Understanding
the multimorbidity associated with emerging diseases such as
COVID-19 is important to classify patients, identify possible
etiological models, and dene differential medical manage-
ment guidelines.8
In critical situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, a good
classication of infected people is important to improve their
care. For those who can seek hospital care, this can be done in
the initial triage, and for those who are cared for at home, it will
serve to identify the risk of infection severity. In addition, recog-
nizing the multimorbidity as a multidimensional and complex
condition will allow the development of more complex risk
classications, to identify subjects who need greater vigilance
at the community and hospital level, or to formulate “telework”
recommendations in certain occupations.
The wide variety of multimorbidity patterns includes the
most frequent co-occurrences that were evident since the
beginning of the pandemic, and the co-occurrences with less
frequency that appear every time there are more cases, and per-
haps it will include orphan diseases,9,10 and those of endemic
foci.11 In these circumstances, low prevalence signies more
clinical complexity. In this study, we used Colombian data to
describe patterns or multimorbidity among individuals diag-
nosed with COVID-19.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Ofcial nominal data of conrmed cases of COVID-19 for
Colombia, with a cutoff date of June 11, 2020 throughout the
country were included in this study. This data had a good per-
formance according to an analysis based on Bedford’s law.12
Data used in this study correspond to the ofcial report that
is constructed daily with the cases that have been conrmed
by the National Institute of Health, based on laboratory tests
(reex nasal swab reverse transcription PCR). Although it has
a lag of a few days, it is the most reliable source of data on
the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Colombia. The other available
sources have greater lags and may incorporate suspected cases
that did not have conrmatory laboratory tests.
By that date, 17 790 cases and 1 488 deaths by COVID-19 were
reported. This database has information on each case, speci-
cally: municipality and department of occurrence, date of onset
of symptoms, date of diagnosis, date of report, sex, and age.
For each dead individual, the presence or absence of a prede-
termined list of comorbidities is reported in the database: high
blood pressure (HBP), diabetes mellitus, respiratory disease,
cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD), cerebro-
vascular disease, smoking, cancer, thyroid disease, autoimmune
disease, and HIV. This list includes nine of the top 10 chronic
diseases identied in a systematic review of measurements of
multimorbidity.13 Although smoking is not a chronic disease, it
is a chronic health condition that has direct functional effects,
beyond being a risk factor for other diseases, reason why it is
incorporated as part of a broad denition of multimorbidity in
this analysis.
Individuals reported as hospitalized or in the Intensive Care
Unit (ICU) were not included because they were in an inter-
mediate stage of their medical treatment and the denitive
outcome was unknown (recovery or death). Information about
chronic disease among mild and moderate cases of COVID-19
is not available by the time of this analysis. The database can be
requested from the Colombian Ministry of Health and Health
Protection.
Statistical methods. First, the description of the prevalence of
each disease among fatal cases was made individually, without
considering the co-occurrence of other health conditions. These
patterns were compared between age groups using x2 test. Sub-
sequently, all possible disease dyads and triads were identied,
characterizing multimorbidity. With this procedure the 10 most
prevalent (>2%) multimorbidity patterns were recognized.
TABLE 1. Prevalence of health conditions¥ among fatal cases of
COVID-19 in Colombia
Under 60 years 60 years and more
Only one condition
co-occurrence Prevalence
(%) 95% CI Prevalence
(%) 95% CI
HBP 26.80 20.84 33.45 39.76 33.07 46.74
Respiratory disease 7.20 4.56 10.70 19.46 14.82 24.82
Diabetes 18.36 14.72 22.48 18.81 15.55 22.44
Cardiovascular disease 7.94 5.98 10.30 16.77 13.75 20.17
Kidney disease 5.71 4.58 7.57 11.86 10.20 13.69
Obesity 18.61 14.14 23.78 5.19 4.13 6.43
Smoking 3.97 1.87 7.31 5.19 3.61 7.20
Stroke 0.74 0.09 2.65 4.63 3.62 5.93
Thyroid disease 1.99 0.76 4.19 4.54 2.33 7.89
Cancer 2.48 1.07 4.87 3.89 2.38 5.97
Autoimmune disease 3.97 1.38 8.73 1.11 0.39 2.38
HIV 2.48 0.70 6.75 0.36 0.10 0.91
Two or more conditions
co-occurrence
HBP + Diabetes 9.68 7.09 12.82 11.03 8.66 13.78
HBP + Cardiovascular
disease 3.23 1.69 5.53 8.71 6.19 11.87
HBP + Respiratory
disease 2.25 1.20 3.77 7.60 5.67 9.94
HBP + Chronic Kidney
Disease 1.99 1.16 3.17 5.75 4.42 7.32
Cardiovascular disease
+ Respiratory disease 1.24 0.45 2.71 3.99 2.69 5.67
Diabetes +
Cardiovascular
disease
2.48 1.31 4.23 3.71 2.71 4.93
HBP + Obesity 5.21 3.18 7.99 2.87 2.16 3.74
Diabetes +
Cardiovascular
disease + HBP
1.49 0.54 3.25 2.50 1.76 3.45
Smoking + Respiratory
disease 0.74 0.16 2.15 2.22 1.48 3.21
Diabetes + Obesity 4.96 3.46 6.86 1.67 0.88 2.87
¥ Only dyads and triads with higher prevalences.
HBP, high blood pressure.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N61
Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths Original research
Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166 3
For the estimation of prevalences, it was assumed that the
individuals observed were a random sample of cases from
the total population of COVID-19 cases that will be observed
in Colombia at the end of the pandemic, which is reasonable
given that the country has several weeks with sustained local
transmission. Given this assumption, and that the prevalences
are exceptionally low, exact 95% Clopper-Pearson condence
intervals were estimated.14 Cluster at the department level were
considered to consider the spatial correlation of observations.
A locally weighted polynomial regression was tted between
each morbidity and age (continuous) to identify patterns of
association. This regression was chosen because it uses a non-
parametric method, where the assumptions of conventional
regressions can be relaxed.15 This bivariate exploration included
as dependent variable the presence or not of multimorbidity,
for each type of pattern, age as the exposure variable, and sex
as confounder. Finally, we proposed three simple qualitative
models of multimorbidity for COVID-19 using congurations
described by Valderas et al.4 The analyses were performed with
the statistical software Stata 16 (Stata Corporation, USA).
Ethical considerations. This study was carried out during a
sanitary crisis. Data was collected by territorial health secretaries
and organized by the Colombian National Institute of Health,
and it was freely available to the public in its webpage. There
was no access to personal data or variables that allowed the
identication or localization of the participants. This study was
considered as an response to the World Health Organization´s
call of “… to learn as much as possible as quickly as possible,
in order to inform the ongoing public health response, and
to allow for proper scientic evaluation of new interventions
being tested”.16 Obtained results were informed to the Colom-
bian Ministry of Health to support health policies during the
pandemic.
RESULTS
In this study, 1 488 deaths were analyzed and 61% of them
occurred in men. The mean of age of the fatal outcomes was
67.59 years (median: 69 years; percentiles: p10= 46, p25= 58, p75=
79, p90= 86 years) and only 27.19% of the deaths occurred among
people under 60 years. Table 1 shows the main health condi-
tions accompanying COVID-19 infection, with their respective
prevalences and 95% condence intervals, according to the
age groups (under 60, and 60 years and more). Prevalences of
FIGURE 1. Prevalence of the 10 main dyads and triads identified among fatal cases of COVID-19 in Colombia, by age group
HBP, high blood pressure.
Original research Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths
4 Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166
FIGURE 2. Locally weighted polynomial regressions between COVID-19, health condition and age, among fatal cases in Colombia*
* Only includes health conditions separately.
HBP, high blood pressure.
respiratory, cardiovascular or kidney diseases, stroke, HBP +
cardiovascular disease, HBP + respiratory disease, HBP +
chronic kidney disease were higher among individuals with
60 or more years. Obesity was more frequent among under
60 years old. Figure 1 shows that multimorbidity prevalence
increases markedly among those over 80 years.
Figure 2 shows the probability of each morbidity according
to age, considered separately. In general, there is a tendency
to increase the probability of each morbidity with increasing
age, and only high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and
kidney chronic disease tend to be linear. In contrast, obesity
decreases the probability of occurrence with increasing age,
whereas smoking, thyroid disease, cancer, autoimmune disease,
and HIV have not a clear trend towards increase or decrease.
In short, among the fatal cases of COVID-19, the occurrence of
multimorbidities is positively associated with age, as is known.
One of the exceptions is obesity, which is more frequent in fatal
young cases. This is also shown by the fact that obesity has a
higher occurrence in fatal cases in young people.
Figure 3 shows the probability of each pattern of multi-
morbidity according to the 12 top complex health conditions
(COVID-19 + two or more health conditions) according to age. In
these cases, the relationships are heterogeneous and non-linear-
ity is common. The COVID-19 + high blood pressure + diabetes
pattern has an inverted U distribution and it is very important
due to its relative high prevalence. It contrasts with the linear
relationship of COVID-19 + high blood pressure + respiratory
disease. In summary, not all multimorbidity increases with age,
as is commonly thought.
DISCUSSION
Findings of this study indicate that multimorbidity is an
important phenomenon to consider in the context of the COVID-
19 pandemic. The co-occurrences of COVID-19 with different
combinations of diseases including high blood pressure, diabe-
tes mellitus, obesity, cardiovascular, respiratory, and CKD have
a high frequency among individuals deceased by COVID-19 in
Colombia and other countries. Identication of these multimor-
bidity patterns among individuals diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2
infection could provide insights for patient triage for hospital-
ization, and basic care at home according to the estimated risk.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N61
Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths Original research
Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166 5
Moreover, identication of non-infected individuals with high-
risk ages and specic multimorbidity patterns could serve to
dene possible interventions of selective connement or special
management.
The top six morbidities identied have a strong relationship
with age (HBP, respiratory disease, diabetes, cardiovascular
disease, CKD, and obesity). Most of these six associations were
positive but not linear, except obesity and diabetes where the
association decreases with age after a turning point. Given
that these results are conditional on death, these relationships
could mainly be explained by survivor bias, since diabetes and
obesity are not only more prevalent in young adults, but also,
in turn, this is the effect of higher mortality before 60 years of
age. However, the importance of this nding is that it precisely
identies that diseases such as obesity and diabetes are more
relevant in adults younger than 60 years as potential factors
associated with COVID-19 fatality. Other diseases such as thy-
roid disease, HIV, autoimmune disease, stroke, and cancer seem
to be important, although not age-related. These diseases seem
FIGURE 3. Locally weighted polynomial regressions between COVID-19, complex patterns of health conditions and age, among
fatal cases in Colombia*
* Includes patterns of two or more health conditions.
HBP, high blood pressure.
to be important regardless of age as factors associated with fatal
outcomes of COVID-19 infection.
With the multimorbidity classication by Valderas et al4 it
is possible to identify that among individuals diagnosed with
COVID-19 there are different types of multimorbidity. We
propose that there are least three possible models between
COVID-19 and chronic diseases (gure 4). In the rst model,
chronic disease is an effect modier of SARS-CoV-2 infection,
increasing the risk of complications and severity. The second
model incorporates the existence of common causes associated
with the chronic disease and related clinical or social factors.
Finally, in model 3 there is only a temporary concurrence of the
chronic disease and COVID-19 infection, but there is neither
relationship among them, nor they have common causes. To
determine which congurations are more frequent and which
ones apply to each chronic disease, cohort studies that consider
the nature of these relationships are required.
In response to this situation with different etiological models,
it is possible to improve the proposed guidelines for managing
Original research Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths
6 Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166
chronic diseases when they co-occur with COVID-19. For
instance, guidelines for COVID-19 individuals with high blood
pressure,17 diabetes,18,19 cardiovascular disease,20 kidney dis-
ease,21 metabolic and bariatric surgery,22 endocrine surgery,23
lung cancer,24 stroke,25 and systemic sclerosis.26 There are also
recommendations for older adults with multimorbidity and
polypharmacy.27,28 These types of practices and discussions
associated with the proposed changes to manage patients
are evidence of the complexity of COVID and the associated
FIGURE 4. Proposed models between chronic disease and COVID-19 infection observed among Colombian patients*
* Simple theoretical models; in the clinical practice there are many variables involved.
multimorbidity. However, the more difcult cases will be
individuals with COVID-19 and complex diseases with low
prevalence.
Multimorbidity should be understood as a vulnerability
condition itself, and more than the additive sum of chronic
diseases. Multimorbidity is like a concentration of expressions
in a unique health-disease process, which means that it’s the
joint result of the risk factors and pathophysiological changes
associated with each of the health conditions involved. Among
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N61
Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths Original research
Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166 7
older adults, this medical complexity congures the frailty
syndrome,29 that affects physiological reserves and multiple
systems, making older adults more susceptible to complica-
tions and death from COVID-19, like from other diseases. This
could explain the well-recognized relationship between age
and severity in COVID-19, which is undoubtedly measured by
multimorbidity.
For this reason, in this study multimorbidity was included
as an underlying latent variable in our analysis. Similar expe-
riences were found with the Patient-Centered Clinical Method
(PCCM) questionnaire in Canada, where the complexity of mul-
timorbidity and associated factors can be comparable.30 There
are even other analyses comparing ways of approaching mul-
timorbidity, which suggests that hierarchical cluster analysis
shows comorbidity, while exploratory factor analysis multi-
morbidity.31 Subsequent analyses can use this approach to build
scales of risk of death and complications. In addition, diseases
that co-occur in time and place congure the existence of a syn-
demic. For Singer and Clair, a syndemic occurs because there
are social characteristics that are acting as determinants, so ade-
quate management requires a more comprehensive approach.32
In this case, COVID-19 co-occurs with different multimorbidity
patterns, which is specic to a complex emergent disease.
Results presented here should be interpreted taking into
account some methodological limitations. First, in this study
other conditions that have been used in multimorbidity
indices were not available: (osteo)arthritis, hearth failure,
depression, osteoporosis, peripheral arterial occlusive dis-
ease, vision problems, dementia, hearing problems and angina
pectoris13. Colombian ofcial database only includes the 10
conditions reported in this study. However, with the exception
of heart failure and angina, all other conditions have higher
prevalences among older adults. For this reason, they would
not be directly associated with the risk of becoming infected
or dying from COVID-19. Heart failure and angina would be
covered by the label “cardiovascular disease”, so we consider
that the most relevant morbidities associated with COVID-19
severity were considered. Another limitation is related to the
non-inclusion of socioeconomic health conditions, disability
and functional dependence, geriatric syndromes, and mental
health problems (mainly depression and dementia). Although
their relationship with the probability of death is more direct,
if they are theoretically part of multimorbidity from a broader
perspective8, and could indirectly affect the clinical outcome
of the disease, by affecting access to health services, adherence
to treatment or its effectiveness, as well as the biological inter-
action of the underlying conditions. Although the analyses
presented here are limited to the patterns of multimorbidity
with the highest occurrence, it is important to note that this
situation can occur with diseases of lesser occurrence (includ-
ing neglected diseases) which could be important in some
regions. In this case, the medical care becomes a big challenge
for clinicians.
In conclusion, in this study the patterns of multimorbidity
among people diagnosed with COVID-19 in Colombia during
the acute period of infection were presented. Undoubtedly, in
the future, more multimorbidity patterns will be known. Sim-
ilar analyses in different regions that incorporate the different
epidemiological patterns33 may facilitate the care of people with
COVID-19, and the prevention of transmission among high-
risk populations.
Author contributions. JAFN designed the study and the sta-
tistical analysis; AJI wrote the rst draft of the manuscript. All
authors discussed the results and reviewed and approved the
nal version.
Funding. None declared.
Conflicts of interest. None declared.
Disclaimer. Authors hold sole responsibility for the views
expressed in the manuscript, which may not necessarily reect
the opinion or policy of the RPSP/PAJPH and/or PAHO.
REFERENCES
1. deLima Thomas J. Pandemic as teacher — forcing clinicians
to inhabit the experience of serious illness. N Engl J Med. 2020
http://10.1056/NEJMp2015024 [Online ahead of print].
2. Hardman D, Geraghty AWA, Lown M, Bishop FL. Subjunc-
tive medicine: Enacting efcacy in general practice. Soc Sci Med.
2020;245:112693. http://10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112693
3. Salisbury C. Multimorbidity: redesigning health care for peo-
ple who use it. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):7-9. doi: http://10.1016/
S0140-6736(12)60482-6
4. Valderas JM, Stareld B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M. Dening
comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health ser-
vices. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):357-363. http://10.1370/afm.983
5. Phan LT, Nguyen TV, Huynh LKT, et al. Clinical features, isolation,
and complete genome sequence of severe acute respiratory syn-
drome coronavirus 2 from the rst two patients in Vietnam. J Med
Virol. 2020 http://10.1002/jmv.26075 [Online ahead of print].
6. Wang X, Fang X, Cai Z, et al. Comorbid chronic diseases and
acute organ injuries are strongly correlated with disease sever-
ity and mortality among COVID-19 patients: a systemic
review and meta-analysis. Research (Wash D C) 2020:2402961.
http://10.34133/2020/2402961
7. Tian W, Jiang W, Yao J, et al. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized
COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med
Virol. 2020 http://10.1002/jmv.26050 [Online ahead of print].
8. Fernández-Niño JA, Bustos-Vázquez E. Multimorbilidad: bases
conceptuales, modelos epidemiológicos y retos de su medición. Bio-
medica. 2016;36(2):188-203. http://10.7705/biomedica.v36i2.2710
9. Mayrides M, Ruiz de Castilla EM, Szelepski S. A civil society view of
rare disease public policy in six Latin American countries. Orphanet
J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):60. doi: http://10.1186/s13023-020-1314-z
10. Malecki SL, Van Mil S, Graf J, et al. A genetic model for multi-
morbidity in young adults. Genet Med. 2020;22(1):132-141. doi:
http://10.1038/s41436-019-0603-1
11. Vélez ID, Ortega J, Hurtado MI, Salazar AL, Robledo SM, Jimenez
JN, Velásquez LE. Epidemiology of paragonimiasis in Colombia.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94(6):661-3. doi: http://10.1016/
s0035-9203(00)90223-2
12. Manrique-Hernández EF, Moreno-Montoya J, Hurtado-Ortíz A, Pri-
eto-Alvarado FE, Idrovo AJ. Desempeño del sistema de vigilancia
colombiano durante la pandemia de COVID-19: evaluación rápida
de los primeros 50 días. Biomedica. 2020;40(supl.2):96-103. https://
doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5582 [Online ahead of print].
Original research Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths
8 Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166
13. Diederichs C, Berger K, Bartels DB. The measurement of multiple
chronic diseases –a systematic review on existing multimorbidity
indices. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66:301-11. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1093/gerona/glq208
14. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of condence or ducial limits
illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–413.
15. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally weighted regression: an approach
to regression analysis by local tting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:596-
610. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478639
16. World Health Organization. Guidance for managing ethical issues
in infectious disease; 2016. https://www.who.int/tdr/news/2016/
ethical-issues-in-inf-dis-outbreaks/en/ (accessed August 16, 2020).
17. Sanchis-Gomar F, Lavie CJ, Perez-Quilis C, Henry BM, Lippi G.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and antihypertensives (angioten-
sin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors)
in coronavirus disease 2019. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 http://10.1016/j.
mayocp.2020.03.026 [Online ahead of print].
18. Kaiser UB, Mirmira RG, Stewart PM. Our response to COVID-19
as endocrinologists and diabetologists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2020;105(5):dgaa148. doi: http://10.1210/clinem/dgaa148
19. Katulanda P, Dissanayake HA, Ranathunga I, et al. Prevention
and management of COVID-19 among patients with diabetes: an
appraisal of the literature. Diabetologia. 2020:1-13. http://10.1007/
s00125-020-05164-x
20. Floyd CN, Wierzbicki AS. Reorganizing the treatment of car-
diovascular disease in response to coronavirus disease 2019;
time for the polypill? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020 http://10.1097/
HCO.0000000000000759 [Online ahead of print].
21. Johnson KM, Belfer JJ, Peterson GR, Boelkins MR, Dumkow LE.
Managing COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients: a review of
recent literature and case supporting corticosteroid-sparing immu-
nosuppression. Pharmacotherapy. 2020. http://10.1002/phar.2410
[Online ahead of print].
22. Yang W, Wang C, Shikora S, Kow L. Recommendations for metabolic
and bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic from IFSO.
Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2071-2073. http://10.1007/s11695-020-04578-1
23. Jozaghi Y, Zafereo ME, Perrier ND, et al. Endocrine surgery in the
coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: surgical triage guidelines. Head
Neck. 2020;42(6):1325-1328. http://10.1002/hed.26169
24. Singh AP, Berman AT, Marmarelis ME, et al. Management of
lung cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. JCO Oncol Pract.
2020:OP2000286. http://10.1200/OP.20.00286
25. Qureshi AI, Abd-Allah F, Alsenani F, et al. Management
of acute ischemic stroke in patients with COVID-19 infec-
tion: Report of an international panel. Int J Stroke. 2020 http://
10.1177/1747493020923234 [Online ahead of print].
26. Matucci-Cerinic M, Bruni C, Allanore Y, et al. Systemic
sclerosis and the COVID-19 pandemic: World Scleroderma Foun-
dation preliminary advice for patient management. Ann Rheum Dis.
2020;79(6):724-726. http://10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217407
27. Ailabouni NJ, Hilmer SN, Kalisch L, Braund R, Reeve E. COVID-19
pandemic: Considerations for safe medication use in older adults
with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. J Gerontol Biol A Sci Med
Sci. 2020:glaa104. http://10.1093/gerona/glaa104
28. Lauretani F, Ravazzoni G, Roberti MF, et al. Assessment and treat-
ment of older individuals with COVID 19 multi-system disease:
Clinical and ethical implications. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(2):150-168.
http://10.23750/abm.v91i2.9629
29. dos Santos Tavares DM, de Freitas Corrêa TA, Dias FA, dos Santos
Ferreira PC, Sousa Pegorari M. Frailty syndrome and socioeco-
nomic and health characteristics among older adults. Colomb Med
(Cali). 2017;48(3):126–31. doi: 10.25100/cm.v48i3.1978
30. Nguyen TN, Ngangue PA, Ryan BL, Stewart M, Brown JB, Bouhali
T, Fortin M. The revised patient perception of patient-centeredness
questionnaire: exploring the factor structure in French-speaking
patients with multimorbidity. Health Expect. 2020. doi: 10.1111/
hex.13068. Online ahead of print.
31. Roso-Llorach A, Violán C, Foguet-Boreu Q, et al. Comparative anal-
ysis of methods for identifying multimorbidity patterns: a study
of ‘real-world’ data. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e018986. http://10.1136/
bmjopen-2017-018986
32. Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualiz-
ing disease in bio-social context. Med Anthropol Q. 2003;17:423-441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423
33. Macinko J, Andrade FCD, Nunes BP, Guanais FC. Primary care and
multimorbidity in six Latin American and Caribbean countries. Rev
Panam Salud Publica. 2019;43:e8. doi: http://10.26633/RPSP.2019.8
Manuscript received on 15 June 2020. Revised version accepted for publication
on 15 September 2020.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
N61
Fernández-Niño et al. • Multimorbidity patterns among COVID-19 deaths Original research
Rev Panam Salud Publica 44, 2020 | www.paho.org/journal | https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.166 9
Patrones de multimorbilidad entre los casos fatales de COVID-19: propuesta
para la construcción de modelos etiológicos
RESUMEN Objetivos. Describir los patrones de multimorbilidad entre los casos fatales de COVID-19, y proponer una
clasificación de los pacientes basada en la edad y los patrones de multimorbilidad para iniciar la construcción
de modelos etiológicos.
Métodos. Se incluyeron los datos de las muertes confirmadas por COVID-19 en Colombia hasta el 11 de junio
de 2020 (n=1 488 muertes). Se exploraron las relaciones entre la COVID-19, las combinaciones de enferme-
dades y la edad utilizando regresiones polinómicas con ponderación local.
Resultados. Las enfermedades más frecuentes fueron la hipertensión arterial, las enfermedades respirato-
rias, la diabetes, las enfermedades cardiovasculares y las enfermedades renales. Las díadas más frecuentes
fueron la hipertensión arterial combinada con diabetes, enfermedades cardiovasculares o enfermedades
respiratorias. Algunos patrones de multimorbilidad aumentan la probabilidad de morir en las personas may-
ores, mientras que otros no están relacionados con la edad o disminuyen la probabilidad de morir en las
personas mayores. A diferencia de lo que con frecuencia se considera, no toda la multimorbilidad aumenta
con la edad. La obesidad, aislada o combinada con otras enfermedades, se asocia con un mayor riesgo de
enfermedad grave en los jóvenes, mientras que el riesgo de la díada hipertensión arterial/diabetes tiende a
tener una distribución en U invertida en relación con la edad.
Conclusiones. La clasificación de los individuos según la multimorbilidad en el manejo médico de los paci-
entes con COVID-19 es importante para determinar los posibles modelos etiológicos y definir el triaje de los
pacientes para su hospitalización. Además, la identificación de los individuos no infectados con edades y
patrones de multimorbilidad de alto riesgo sirve para definir posibles intervenciones de confinamiento selec-
tivo o manejo especial.
Palabras clave Betacoronavirus; multimorbilidad; atención médica; mortalidad; Colombia.
... Cardiometabolic multimorbidity, in particular, has been linked to increased risks of COVID-19 infection [16] and a worse prognosis once infected [17]. Multimorbidity was very common among older adults who had severe CO-VID-19 infection [18] and among those who died of COVID-19 [19]. The former identified the most common patterns as stroke with hypertension, diabetes and hypertension, and chronic kidney disease and hypertension [18]; the latter study reported hypertension with diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), or respiratory disease as the most frequent [19]. ...
... Multimorbidity was very common among older adults who had severe CO-VID-19 infection [18] and among those who died of COVID-19 [19]. The former identified the most common patterns as stroke with hypertension, diabetes and hypertension, and chronic kidney disease and hypertension [18]; the latter study reported hypertension with diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), or respiratory disease as the most frequent [19]. ...
... To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the associations between complex comorbidity patterns (beyond multimorbidity patterns) and COVID-19 infection and subsequent hospital admissions among older adults; thus, direct comparisons with previous studies are difficult to make. Cardiometabolic multimorbidity reportedly had a high risk of COVID-19 infection and worse outcomes in adults [16,17] and older adults [18,19], partially supporting our findings on CVD with complex comorbidities. CVDs, lung diseases, and psychiatric conditions are regarded as high-risk for severe illness predisposed to COVID-19, according to the NHS [22], the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [29] and previous studies [5,10,11]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Older adults are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections; however, little is known about which comorbidity patterns are related to a higher risk of COVID-19 infection. This study investigated the role of long-term conditions or comorbidity patterns on COVID-19 infection and related hospitalisations. Methods: This study included 4,428 individuals from Waves 8 (2016-2017) and 9 (2018-2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) who also participated in the ELSA COVID-19 Substudy in 2020. Comorbidity patterns were identified using an agglomerative hierarchical clustering method. The relationships between comorbidity patterns or long-term conditions and COVID-19-related outcomes were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults in England, those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and complex comorbidities had an almost double risk of COVID-19 infection (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.42-2.46) but not of COVID-19-related hospitalisation. A similar pattern was observed for the heterogeneous comorbidities cluster (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.24-1.96). The individual investigations of long-term conditions with COVID-19 infection highlighted primary associations with CVD (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.23-1.74), lung diseases (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.17-1.69), psychiatric conditions (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.16-1.68), retinopathy/eye diseases (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.18-1.64), and arthritis (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.09-1.48). In contrast, metabolic disorders and diagnosed diabetes were not associated with any COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusion: This study provides novel insights into the comorbidity patterns that are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections and hospitalisations, highlighting the vulnerability of those with CVD and other complex comorbidities. These findings facilitate crucial new evidence that should be considered for appropriate screening measures and tailored interventions for older adults in the ongoing global outbreak.
... Questions regarding the death of immediate family members caused by COVID-19 were also asked. In addition, subjects were asked whether they had chronic diabetes; hypertension; joint, lung, heart, kidney, or mental disorders; and other chronic diseases 20,21 . The yes answers were added, counted, and grouped into no chronic disease, one disease, or more than one disease. ...
... It has been proven that people who have comorbidities with certain diseases, especially high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, and so on, will make COVID-19 worse and even increase the risk of death. With this, all people who have physical illnesses, especially more than one, will become more anxious because they know they are at high risk of death if infected 20 . ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on all populations, including non-health workers. As the pandemic's trajectory remains uncertain, holistic, inclusive, and multidisciplinary, interventions become paramount. Therefore, this study aims to determine the anxiety level among non-health workers and its influential determinants. Participants were workers from the Ministry of Health in Indonesia. The on-line anxiety questionnaire used was the General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire 7 (GAD-7). Data analysis was carried out using the STATA statistical program, and 1020 participant responses were analyzed. The proportion of non-health workers experiencing anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic was as follows: 26.7% (95% CI=24.03-29.47) experienced mild anxiety; 4.60% (95% CI=3.48-6.08) experienced moderate anxiety; and 1.76% (95% CI=1.11-2.78) experienced severe anxiety, while 66.90% (95% CI= 64.0-69.80) of respondents did not report anxiety. Furthermore, it was observed that having more than one chronic illness was the most contributing factor to anxiety (OR adj= 1.838 (95% CI=1.063-3.178)); p = 0.029. Unsurprisingly, it was found that the anxiety of non-health workers is lower than that of health care workers in Indonesia. In addition, the risk of experiencing anxiety is higher among workers with more than one chronic disease. A suggestion that can be made is that non-health workers must continue to control their health even during the pandemic.
... Therefore, considering multimorbidity (defined as the co-occurrence of at least two chronic conditions) in COVID-19 patients can provide better results for the identification of high-risk groups and informing treatment [9]. Second, while there is no consensus on the method used to measure multimorbidity, most previous studies have relied on counting the number of chronic comorbidities [5,[10][11][12], employing variablecentered approaches [13], or using specific cut points such as the Charlson comorbidity Index [14]. ...
... Count-based measures of multimorbidity have been utilized to predict emergency hospitalizations [7,8]. Common combinations of medical conditions have been documented to delineate patterns of multimorbidity [9,10]. Previous studies have explored multimorbidity combinations using methods such as latent class analysis [11], cluster analysis [12], network analysis [13], factor analysis [14], association rules, and tree-based analysis [13,15]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Multimorbidity is a significant public health concern, characterized by the coexistence and interaction of multiple preexisting medical conditions. This complex condition has been associated with an increased risk of COVID-19. Individuals with multimorbidity who contract COVID-19 often face a significant reduction in life expectancy. The postpandemic period has also highlighted an increase in frailty, emphasizing the importance of integrating existing multimorbidity details into epidemiological risk assessments. Managing clinical data that include medical histories presents significant challenges, particularly due to the sparsity of data arising from the rarity of multimorbidity conditions. Also, the complex enumeration of combinatorial multimorbidity features introduces challenges associated with combinatorial explosions. Objective This study aims to assess the severity of COVID-19 in individuals with multiple medical conditions, considering their demographic characteristics such as age and sex. We propose an evolutionary machine learning model designed to handle sparsity, analyzing preexisting multimorbidity profiles of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 based on their medical history. Our objective is to identify the optimal set of multimorbidity feature combinations strongly associated with COVID-19 severity. We also apply the Apriori algorithm to these evolutionarily derived predictive feature combinations to identify those with high support. Methods We used data from 3 administrative sources in Piedmont, Italy, involving 12,793 individuals aged 45-74 years who tested positive for COVID-19 between February and May 2020. From their 5-year pre–COVID-19 medical histories, we extracted multimorbidity features, including drug prescriptions, disease diagnoses, sex, and age. Focusing on COVID-19 hospitalization, we segmented the data into 4 cohorts based on age and sex. Addressing data imbalance through random resampling, we compared various machine learning algorithms to identify the optimal classification model for our evolutionary approach. Using 5-fold cross-validation, we evaluated each model’s performance. Our evolutionary algorithm, utilizing a deep learning classifier, generated prediction-based fitness scores to pinpoint multimorbidity combinations associated with COVID-19 hospitalization risk. Eventually, the Apriori algorithm was applied to identify frequent combinations with high support. Results We identified multimorbidity predictors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization, indicating more severe COVID-19 outcomes. Frequently occurring morbidity features in the final evolved combinations were age>53, R03BA (glucocorticoid inhalants), and N03AX (other antiepileptics) in cohort 1; A10BA (biguanide or metformin) and N02BE (anilides) in cohort 2; N02AX (other opioids) and M04AA (preparations inhibiting uric acid production) in cohort 3; and G04CA (Alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists) in cohort 4. Conclusions When combined with other multimorbidity features, even less prevalent medical conditions show associations with the outcome. This study provides insights beyond COVID-19, demonstrating how repurposed administrative data can be adapted and contribute to enhanced risk assessment for vulnerable populations.
... Also, people who died from COVID-19 in Colombia and other countries revealed a high frequency of co-occurring COVID-19 and a variety of diseases, such as high blood pressure, d i a b e t e s m e l l i t u s , o b e s i t y , cardiovascular, respiratory, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Finding these multimorbidity patterns in people with SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnoses may h e l p w i t h p a t i e n t t r i a g e f o r 21 hospitalization and home-based care. Healthcare facilities were heavily burdened by COVID-19, particularly w h e n c a r i n g f o r p a t i e n t s w i t h 22 comorbidities. ...
... 21 It has already been well established in the scientific literature that individuals who have a diet with a higher proportion of fibers, fruits, vegetables, and legumes, as well as lower consumption of saturated fat, dietary and fatal outcomes associated with comorbidities. 22,23,25 Our study stands out from others insofar as we carried out an evaluation that simultaneously encompassed quantitative and qualitative dietary Above shows the ranking of the most consumed foods during the pre-pandemic period, and below shows the ranking of the most consumed foods during the pandemic period, according to the NOVA classification (Monteiro, 2019 characteristics, considering the processing steps of the foods consumed by the sample, in order to associate them with harmful health outcomes and mortality. ...
Article
Morozov Children’s City Clinical Hospital, almost in the first months of the development of the COVID-19 epidemic, began to admit not only patients with acute infection, but mainly with combined comorbid pathology. Based on a retrospective analysis of 290 medical records of children hospitalized with COVID-19 at the Children’s City Clinical Hospital, an analysis of children admitted to the hospital with predominantly comorbid pathology was carried out between April 2020 and September 2020. Six of these children had a fatal outcome. Most children were in the first 3 years of life (38,4 %) and puberty (37,3 %). The diagnoses of hospitalized patients were varied: pneumonia — 41 (14,4 %), surgical pathology and trauma — 69 (24,3 %), somatic pathology — 120 (42,3 %), including: diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys and urinary tract pathways, hematological diseases, neurological, type I diabetes mellitus, joint diseases, diseases of the newborn period, oncological diseases, diseases of the cardiovascular system. To diagnose covid pneumonia, along with rapid methods of SARS-COV2, computed tomography of the lungs was used. Analyzing the course of diseases in surgical children, it can be noted that coronavirus infection did not affect the course of the underlying disease. At the same time, COVID-19 infection in hematological patients provoked a worsening of the condition with symptoms of an acute respiratory viral infection (hyperthermia, weakness, cough, rhinitis). In patients with symptomatic focal epilepsy and in patients with increased intracranial pressure, SARS-COV-2 caused activation of seizures. It should be noted that the onset of type 1 diabetes was observed in 5 out of 6 admitted children. In these cases, COVID-19 infection was a provoking factor; it also caused an exacerbation in 1 child who had “long-term” diabetes. The article presents case histories and diagnoses of 6 children aged 3 years 9 months to 17 years with deaths, severe comorbid pathology (leukemia, brain stem tumor, immunodeficiency state), in whom COVID-19 infection aggravated the course of the underlying disease with the development of generalized combined bacterial infection, sepsis, bleeding.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Multimorbidity is the coexistence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a person. The study aims to investigate the immediate cause of death and risk factors of mortality including multimorbidity among patients hospitalized with SARS CoV2 infection in Kasaragod district in Kerala, India. Methods A record-based case-control study was done using the hospital records and follow-up surveillance system of SARS-COV 2 patients admitted in the Kasaragod district. SARS-COV 2 patients who had expired during the study period from June to December 2020 and reported as COVID-19 deaths (N = 226) were the cases, and an equal number of hospital controls were the study participants. Results The mean (SD) age of the cases and controls were found to be 64.6 (14.2) years and 61.5 (13.4) years, respectively. Covid pneumonia alone was reported as the cause of death in more than half (52%) of the study participants. This was followed by cardiovascular events (8.5%) and acute kidney injury (6.5%). Among individual comorbidities among people who expired, diabetes mellitus (53%) was the most common, followed by hypertension (46%) and cardiovascular diseases (23%). More than 50% were found to have multimorbidity. Logistic regression showed chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.18 (1.24–3.83)) and malignancy (AOR = 3.05 (1.27–7.32)) to be significantly associated with mortality as individual determinants. Hypertension–diabetes mellitus [AOR = 1.68 (1.02–2.76), P = 0.043] and hypertension–CKD [AOR = 3.49 (1.01–12.01), P = 0.48] dyads were multimorbidities significantly associated with mortality. Conclusion Combinations of hypertension with diabetes mellitus and CKD were found to be significant determinants for mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Uniformity in death certification is required to understand the causes and contributors to death in COVID-19.
Preprint
Introduction Older adults are usually more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections; however, little is known about which comorbidity patterns are related to a higher probability of COVID-19 infection. This study investigated the role of long-term conditions or comorbidity patterns on COVID-19 infection and related hospitalisations. Methods This study included 4,428 individuals from Waves 8 (2016−2017) and 9 (2018−2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), who also participated in the ELSA COVID-19 Substudy in 2020. Comorbidity patterns of chronic conditions were identified using an agglomerative hierarchical clustering method. The relationships between comorbidity patterns or long-term conditions and COVID-19 related outcomes were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults in England, those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and complex comorbidities had an almost double risk of COVID-19 infection (OR=1.87, 95% CI=1.42−2.46) but not of COVID-19 related hospitalisation. A similar pattern was observed for the heterogeneous comorbidities cluster (OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.24−1.96). The individual investigations of long-term conditions with COVID-19 infection highlighted primary associations with CVD (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.23−1.74), lung diseases (OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.17−1.69), psychiatric conditions (OR=1.40, 95% CI=1.16−1.68), retinopathy/eye diseases (OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.18−1.64), and arthritis (OR=1.27, 95% CI=1.09−1.48). In contrast, metabolic disorders and diagnosed diabetes were not associated with any COVID-19 outcomes. Discussion/Conclusion This study provides novel insights into the comorbidity patterns that are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections and highlights the importance of CVD and complex comorbidities. These findings facilitate crucial new evidence for appropriate screening measures and tailored interventions for older adults in the ongoing global outbreak.
Article
Full-text available
Las enfermedades minoritarias (EM) afectan a menos de 5 casos por cada 10 000 habitantes. De forma generalizada su diagnóstico definitivo tarda años en obtenerse y muestran un pronóstico desfavorable. La información publicada sobre estas enfermedades es fundamental para su visibilidad social y para lograr que las personas afectadas obtengan más recursos para la investigación básica y clínica, en especial durante la crisis de la COVID-19. En este artículo se ha examinado la información audiovisual de la televisión pública española TVE desde el 1 de enero de 2019 al 9 de mayo de 2021 sobre estas enfermedades. Bajo el paradigma del framing se han analizado 51 unidades de análisis. Los resultados evidencian que durante la crisis de la COVID-19 la información sobre las enfermedades minoritarias ha tenido un menor eco en la televisión pública española y han prevalecido los temas científicos frente a los de denuncia social e historias de vida.
Article
Full-text available
In January 2020, we identified two SARS‐CoV‐2 infections in a familial cluster with one person coming from Wuhan, China. The complete genome sequences of two SARS‐CoV‐2 strains isolated from these patients were identical and 99.98% similar to strains isolated in Wuhan. This is genetically suggestive of human‐to‐human transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 and indicates Wuhan as the most plausible origin of the early outbreak in Vietnam. The younger patient with a mild upper respiratory illness and a brief viral shedding, while the elderly with multi‐morbidity had pneumonia, prolonged viral shedding, and residual lung damage. Evidence of nonsynonymous substitutions in the ORF1ab region of the viral sequence warrants further studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Mortality rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) continue to rise across the world. Information regarding the predictors of mortality in COVID‐19 patients remains scarce. Herein, we performed a systematic review of published articles, from January 1 to April 24, 2020, to evaluate the risk factors associated with mortality in COVID‐19. Two investigators independently searched the articles and collected the data, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We looked for associations between mortality and patient characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory abnormalities. A total of 14 studies documenting the outcomes of 4659 patients were included. The presence of comorbidities such as hypertension (OR 2.5; 95% CI 2.1‐3.1; P<0.00001), coronary heart disease (OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.1‐6.9; P<0.00001) and diabetes (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.7‐2.3; P<0.00001) were associated with significantly higher risk of death amongst COVID‐19 patients. Those who died, compared to those who survived, differed on multiple biomarker levels on admission including elevated levels of cardiac troponin (+44.2 ng/L, 95% CI 19.0‐69.4; P=0.0006); C‐reactive protein (+66.3 µg/mL, 95% CI 46.7‐85.9; P<0.00001); interleukin‐6 (+4.6 ng/mL, 95% CI 3.6‐5.6; P<0.00001); D‐dimer (+4.6 µg/mL, 95% CI 2.8‐6.4; P<0.00001); creatinine (+15.3 µmol/L, 95% CI 6.2‐24.3; P=0.001) and alanine transaminase (+5.7 U/L, 95% CI 2.6‐8.8; P=0.0003); as well as decreased levels of albumin (‐3.7 g/L, 95% CI ‐5.3 to ‐2.1; P<0.00001). Individuals with underlying cardiometabolic disease and that present with evidence for acute inflammation and end‐organ damage are at higher risk of mortality due to COVID‐19 infection and should be managed with greater intensity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The COVID pandemic is a challenge for public health surveillance (PHS), and an opportunity to assess its strengths and weaknesses, in order to improve the response. Objective: To evaluate the performance of the Colombian PHS system during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country. Materials and methods: Data between March 6 and April 24, 2020, published by the National Institute of Health (INS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) were analyzed. In the evaluation was considered: i) quality of data according to Benford's law fulfillment and ii) timeliness of the information, measured as the difference in dates between the data generated in the INS and that appear in the WHO situational report. Variability in fulfillment with Benford's law was evaluated with the p values of log likelihood ratio, x 2 or Moreno's exact tests. Results: Until April 24 there were 4881 cases of COVID-19 in Colombia. Most of the first 50 days Benford's Law was fulfilled, except the first days of epidemic. Difference between INS and WHO reports largely depends on different reporting times. Conclusion: In general, the Colombian PHS system fulfilled the Benford's law, suggesting that there was quality in the data. Future studies comparing the performance of the departments and districts will improve the diagnosis of the Colombian PHS. Key words: coronavirus infections; epidemics; disease notification; epidemiological monitoring; statistical distributions; Colombia.
Article
Full-text available
Covid-19 infection is a multisystem disease more frequent in older individuals, especially in those with multiple chronic diseases. This multimorbid and frail population requires attention and a personalized comprehensive assessment in order to avoid the occurrence of adverse outcomes. As other diseases, the COVID-19 presentation in older patients is often atypical with less severe and unspecific symptoms. These subjects both at home and during hospitalization suffer isolation and the lack of support of caregivers. The geriatric care in COVID-19 wards is often missing. The application of additional instruments would be necessary to facilitate and personalize the clinical approach, not only based on diseases but also on functional status. This narrative review starts from diagnostic evaluation, continues with adapted pharmacologic treatment and ends with the recovery phase targeting the nutrition and physical exercise. We developed a checklist of respiratory, gastro-intestinal and other less-specific symptoms, summarized in a table and easily to be filled-up by patients, nurses and general practitioners. As second step, we reported the clinical phases of this disease. Far to be considered just viral infective and respiratory, this disease is also an inflammatory and thrombotic condition with frequent bacterial over-infection. We finally considered timing and selection of treatment, which depend on the disease phase, co-administration of other drugs and require the monitoring of renal, liver and cardiac function. This underlines the role of age not just as a limitation, but also an opportunity to increase the quality and the appropriateness of multidisciplinary and multidimensional intervention in this population. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Article
Full-text available
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has emerged as one of the greatest challenges faced by humankind in the recent past. People with diabetes and related comorbidities are at increased risk of its complications and of COVID-19-related death. Older age, multi-morbidity, hyperglycaemia, cardiac injury and severe inflammatory response are predictors of poor outcome. The complex interplay between COVID-19, diabetes and the effects of related therapies is being explored. Most patients experience a mild illness with COVID-19, while people with diabetes are at increased risk of severe disease. Optimising glycaemic control and adopting measures to prevent disease spread are critical aspects. The management of mild disease is supportive, while very many immunomodulatory and antiviral therapies are being investigated for the treatment of severe disease. Several of these agents have specific considerations for use in people with diabetes. Since mass population lockdowns are considered a key step in controlling disease spread, it follows that, in addition to the direct vulnerability to severe COVID-19, people with diabetes can be affected by limited access to healthcare, insulin, other medications and blood glucose monitoring equipment. Measures to prevent disease spread at the individual and community level are the key to mitigating the rapidly escalating pandemic, while agents for chemoprophylaxis and vaccines are being explored. People with diabetes should be recognised as a vulnerable group for complicated disease and are at risk during times of disturbed social systems. Strategies are needed to safeguard the health of patients with diabetes during the pandemic. This review summarises the current knowledge and perceived challenges for prevention and management of COVID-19 in people with diabetes.
Article
Full-text available
Background and purpose On 11 March 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 infection a pandemic. The risk of ischemic stroke may be higher in patients with COVID-19 infection similar to those with other respiratory tract infections. We present a comprehensive set of practice implications in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. Methods The practice implications were prepared after review of data to reach the consensus among stroke experts from 18 countries. The writers used systematic literature reviews, reference to previously published stroke guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate practice implications. All members of the writing group had opportunities to comment in writing on the practice implications and approved the final version of this document. Results This document with consensus is divided into 18 sections. A total of 41 conclusions and practice implications have been developed. The document includes practice implications for evaluation of stroke patients with caution for stroke team members to avoid COVID-19 exposure, during clinical evaluation and performance of imaging and laboratory procedures with special considerations of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Conclusions These practice implications with consensus based on the currently available evidence aim to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who are suspected of, or confirmed, with COVID-19 infection. Under certain circumstances, however, only limited evidence is available to support these practice implications, suggesting an urgent need for establishing procedures for the management of stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.
Article
Full-text available
Due to the frequent presence of interstitial lung disease and widespread use of immunosuppressive treatment, systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients may be considered at risk for a more severe disease course and higher mortality when they develop Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus infection. Therefore, with World Scleroderma Foundation endorsement, experts from different specialties including rheumatology, virology and clinical immunology gathered virtually to answer to the main practical clinical questions regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection coming from both patients and physicians. This preliminary advice is aligned with other national and international recommendations, adapted for SSc patients.
Article
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a devastating impact around the world. With high rates of transmission and no curative therapies or vaccine yet available, the current cornerstone of management focuses on prevention by social distancing. This includes decreased health care contact for patients. Patients with lung cancer are a particularly vulnerable population, where the risk of mortality from cancer must now be balanced by the potential risk of a life-threatening infection. In these unprecedented times, a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach is required to streamline but not compromise care. We have developed guidelines at our academic cancer center to standardize management of patients with lung cancer across our health care system and provide guidance to the larger oncology community. We recommend that general principles of lung cancer treatment continue to be followed in most cases where delays could result in rapid cancer progression. We recognize that our recommendations may change over time based on clinical resources and the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. In principle, however, treatment paradigms must continue to be individualized, with careful consideration of risks and benefits of continuing or altering lung cancer–directed therapy.
Article
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced a redesign of healthcare services. Resource reallocation will have consequences on the routine management of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). We consider how to mitigate potential adverse effects. Recent findings: Combination therapy is well established in hypertension. Many guidelines recommend dual antihypertensive therapy as the initial treatment step as this results in faster blood pressure control, albeit with limited evidence of improved outcomes. Control of CVD risk factors through multiclass combination therapy (the polypill) was proposed many years ago. This approach has not been adopted by Western healthcare systems despite improving surrogate outcomes. Recently, the PolyIran trials have demonstrated improved CVD outcomes without increased adverse events, in both primary and secondary prevention. Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic allows models of chronic healthcare to be rethought. Current practices are resource-intensive and there is a need to simplify titration and monitoring protocols in CVD. Moving toward the use of polypill combinations allied with telehealth consultations may be one solution.