Content uploaded by Zaid Suod
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Zaid Suod on Jan 02, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
NeuroQuantology | February 2020 | Volume 18 | Issue 2 | Page 101-105 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed, Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube Using two
Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
101
Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness
of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube
Using two Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed1*, Zaid Saud Razzaq2, Hayder Salah Naeem3
Abstract
This study utilized standard two-source Co
60
and Sr
90
to determine the dead time and randomness of
nuclear disintegration of a Geiger Muller (GM) tube. The experimental result obtained from this research
residual
60
expected
residual
expected
can be attributed to the random nature of nuclear decay
.
Key Words:
DOI Number: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133 NeuroQuantology 2020; 18(2):101-105
Introductions
The Geiger Muller (GM) counter is commonly used
reliability and cost-
experiments can be set up using a GM counter
determination of a GM's plateau
-
classified as a filled gas detector [6].
produces an ion pair consisting of a po
and an electron [7]. The electrons are attracted to
ions. This also increases the radius of the anode
rts the
of the potential will be dictated by the applied
Corresponding author: Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed
Address: 1*-; 2
-Muthann3
-
1*-
2-
3-
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of
any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Received: 11 January 2020 Accepted:
eISSN 1303-5150 www.neuroquantology.com
NeuroQuantology | February 2020 | Volume 18 | Issue 2 | Page 101-105 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed, Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube Using two
Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
102
means that the loss of count depends on the rate of
particle emission from the source and its
schematic of the GM tube and its associated
electronics.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the GM tube and the associated
electronics
exhibited by Geiger counters; the first is the
age reaches the
which the counting system first records pulses is
ation increases
and the number of pulses increase rapidly to a flat
which is the Geiger tube region where the count
rate is nearly independent of the potential
recog
collection as it is closely related to the dead time
phenomenon [11].
Fig. 2. Plateau of Geiger Muller tube
The Dead Time of a GM
Let
be the number of particles entering the GM
tube per second and the counter is showing counts
as
the number of particles entering GM tube per
second counted particles
is
�:
=
(1)
there are two different sources S1 and S2.
Suppose the sources are placed together in such a
way that total number particles entering the tube
2 and if the time count rate shown
by the 3[1013]:
(
1+
2)
3=
1+
23 (2)
When the source S2 keeping S1 the
1 and
1=
1 (3)
2=
2(4)
1 and
2 s. (3) & (4) and
reflecting the higher order terms:
= 1+23
212
(5)
Where: 1 = Count rate with source S1.
2 = Count rate with source S2 .
3 = Count rate with source S1+S2 .
Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration
To study the random of radio
with any counting system is the
actual count rate due
to the random nature of radio
we consider
that the
remains constant for a considerable amount of time
and if the series of counts N1 2
will differ from mean count N
calculated
from the absolute result .
eISSN 1303-5150 www.neuroquantology.com
NeuroQuantology | February 2020 | Volume 18 | Issue 2 | Page 101-105 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed, Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube Using two
Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
103
the randomness of nuclear disintegration:
=
The standard residual residual is the most
likely an and is
defined as:
2=(
)2
1
=1 (6)
expected is defined
as :
=
(7)
The standard error is defined as :
=2
=
(9)
Where:
N
= mean of count.
Ni
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An experimental setup was prepared
Scheme 1. The dead time of a GM tube (Model
ST360 Counter) was determined using a double-
source slot plate method and applied
s were taken from the
Co60sourceS1(half-life of
- and energy decay of0.31MeV)at count per 30
secs. After 1were taken
from theSr90 source S2(half-life of
- and energy decay 0.6MeV)at count per
30 secs were taken for
the(S1&S2) ) at count per 30 secs.
Scheme 1.
Results and Calculations
The counting measurements of the Co60 and Sr90
sources were taken for 30 secs after a decay period
using a GM with the
to 450 Vare
shown in Table 1 as a function of decay times. The
detector was ~624 count per 30 secs for both
sources due to the dead time effect.
Table 1. time
Obs. No.
60 count/30 sec
90 count/30 sec
Co60+Sr90
count/30 sec
1
242
244
572
2
240
256
624
3
221
223
565
4
230
240
594
5
246
6
239
252
595
7
239
232
552
254
264
619
9
249
251
557
10
251
265
605
11
259
253
12
271
265
555
13
237
265
572
14
227
253
597
15
252
16
247
600
17
255
249
590
19
256
245
602
20
265
602
Mean count for Co60
=4937
=4937
20 =246.
Mean count for Sr90
=4971
=4971
20 =.55
Mean count for Co60+Sr90
=11731
=11731
20 = 5.55
eISSN 1303-5150 www.neuroquantology.com
NeuroQuantology | February 2020 | Volume 18 | Issue 2 | Page 101-105 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed, Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube Using two
Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
104
the dead time of the GM
result from Table(1):
i) 60
1=
30 =246.
30 =.23
ii) 90
2=
30 =.55
30 =.
iii) 60 + Sr90
3=
30 =.55
30 =19.55
we can determinethe dead time for
GM tube:
=(1+2)3
212
=(.23 +.)19.55
2.23 .
=3.035
136.37 = 0.022 =22
Table 2.
Obs.
No.
Ni for Co60
count/30sec
(
)2
1
242
-
23.53
2
240
-
46.92
3
221
-
4
230
-
5
-
355.32
6
239
-
61.62
7
239
-
61.62
254
7.15
51.12
9
249
2.15
4.62
10
251
4.15
17.22
11
259
12.15
147.62
12
271
24.15
13
237
-
97.02
14
227
-
394.02
15
252
5.15
26.52
16
1.15
1.32
17
255
66.42
11.15
124.32
19
256
9.15
20
34.15
1166.22
s.6 7 calculate the
the randomness of
its corresponding
standard error:
2=(
)2
1
=1
= {(
)2
1
=1
}12
=[4264.51
20 1]12
=15
=
=246.=15.71
=2
=15
20 = 3.35
=
=246.
20 = 3.51
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
According to the resultst
decay is random and unpredictable within a
source is
independent of each other. When taking a large
number of
counting rate N
measurements by counting the statistics for nuclear
radiation.
Practically tof the count
mean count in the unit of
timecan be predicted usingthe statistical count of
nuclear radiation.
of the practical
were
N. At
Nwith
more
significant .
The measured data were fitted using the mean
described the dead time of a GM
being studied. The actual dead time of a GM counter
is dependent on the counting rate.
The residual can be calculated by using 6
sourceCo60 and was
determined to be15
to the theoretically expected calculated using 7
and determined to be 15.71.
cor (
standard error residual
()was calculated using
eISSN 1303-5150 www.neuroquantology.com
NeuroQuantology | February 2020 | Volume 18 | Issue 2 | Page 101-105 | doi: 10.14704/nq.2020.18.2.NQ20133
Abbas Abdulhussein Mohammed, Determination of the Dead Time and Randomness of Nuclear Disintegration for a Geiger-Muller Tube Using two
Radioactive Source Co60 and Sr90
105
Co60 and was found to be 3.35
compared with the expected standard error
() calculated using 9 and found to
were consistent with a
(
These errors result from the random nature of the
related to the same source and indeterminate
errors resulting from the effects that occur during
-absorption and
tables.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the
Al- .
his encouragement.
Authors' Contributions
All authors contributed
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Lee Gardner Jab M.
d G-M Counter dead time model.
2004; 41: 156–159.
Lee Kim Choi On the dead time problem of a GM
–
2009.
Azooz AA. Operating a Geiger-Müller tube using a PC sound
card. 2009; 30(1): 57–67.
Jiménez de Cisneros Studying the
statistical properties of particle count
. 2004; 25(3): 399–407.
Almutairi Akyurek TUsman S. Voltage dependent pulse
shape analysis of Geiger-Müller counter.
2019; 51(4): –1090.
Tsoulfanidis LSN.
2011.
Akyurek T M X Usman S. GM counter deadtime
ating temperature and
fatigue. 2015; 73: 26–35.
Kazunori Matsuda JS.
the anode wire in a geiger-muller count-gas
at 1 atm.
1990; 294 (1–2): –270.
Usman TAS Almutairi A New Phenomenological Model for
Geiger- .
2017; 117: 496–.
Usman SPatil A.
the Status of Science Shoaib.
; 50(7): 1006–1016.
Myers . -Mueller tube by the double-
source method. 1956; 33(): 395.
The dead time of a Geiger-Müller tube.
1990; 25(1): 60–65.
Syam NS Kim Lim SY Lee . Statistical
Parameter
Models. ; 72(10): 1133–.
eISSN 1303-5150 www.neuroquantology.com