Content uploaded by Jiri Smid
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jiri Smid on Dec 08, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672 655
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672. With 3 figures
Quaternary range dynamics and taxonomy of the
Mediterranean collared dwarf racer, Platyceps collaris
(Squamata: Colubridae)
JIŘÍ ŠMÍD1,2,*,, TATIANA AGHOVÁ3, DOUBRAVKA VELENSKÁ2, JIŘÍ MORAVEC1,
PETR BALEJ4,, BORISLAV NAUMOV5, GEORGI POPGEORGIEV6, NAZAN ÜZÜM7,
AZIZ AVCI7 and DANIEL JABLONSKI8,
1Department of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, Prague, Czech Republic
2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague, Czech Republic
3Centre of Oncocytogenomics, Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General
University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08,
Prague, Czech Republic
4Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech
University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha—Suchdol, 165 00, Czech Republic
5Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Street,
1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
6National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tzar Osvoboditel Boulevard,
1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
7Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey
8Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, Mlynská dolina, 842 15
Bratislava, Slovakia
Received 4 May 2020; revised 13 October 2020; accepted for publication 18 October 2020
The geological and geographical settings of the Eastern Mediterranean have resulted in complex patterns of
intraspecific diversifications and phylogeographical histories that can be observed in squamates. In this study, we
examined genetic differentiation of the Collared dwarf racer (Platyceps collaris) using a multilocus genetic dataset
with a sampling that covered the entire range of the species. We developed distribution models in current and past
climatic conditions to assess the dynamics of the species distribution through time. We sequenced a fragment of
the cytochrome b mitochondrial gene of the holotype and eight paratypes of Coluber rubriceps thracius, which is
considered a synonym of Platyceps collaris. Our results show that there are two distinct clades within P. collaris, one
occupying the Balkans and western and southern Anatolia (termed the Balkan–Anatolian clade), the other in the
Levant (termed the Levantine clade). All type specimens of C. r. thracius are genetically identical and cluster within
the Balkan–Anatolian clade. Distribution models indicate the presence of two refugia during climatically challenging
periods. One was in western Anatolia and served as a source for the colonization of the Balkans and southern
Anatolia, and the other was in the northern Levant, from where P. collaris dispersed further south. According to our
results, we revise the subspecific taxonomy of P. collaris.
ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: biogeography – Colubroidea – Near East – reptiles – Serpentes – systematics.
INTRODUCTION
The Eastern Mediterranean is a region of complex
geological and biological history. As a result of its
position at the crossroads of Europe, Asia and Africa,
the fauna of the Eastern Mediterranean shows a
wide spectrum of biogeographical patterns and
phylogeographical scenarios. Many recent studies
have indicated that the diversity of squamates of the
Eastern Mediterranean is underestimated and that
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jiri.smd@gmail.com
applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt”
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
656 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
traditionally recognized species described on the basis
of morphological characters often encompass cryptic
lineages (e.g. Bellati et al., 2015; Jandzik et al., 2018;
Šmíd et al., 2019). Although considerable interest
has been attracted to the islands (Kyriazi et al.,
2013; Poulakakis et al., 2013), differentiation and
phylogeography of the fauna of coastal Mediterranean
Turkey and the Levant are also being studied
increasingly (Sindaco et al., 2014; Kotsakiozi et al.,
2018; Kornilios et al., 2019). However, little is known
in this respect about some of the widespread and
common taxa. The colubrid genus Platyceps Blyth,
1960 is one such example.
Racers of the genus Platyceps are medium-sized,
slender and wary colubrid snakes. Their distribution
spans from south-eastern Europe across the Middle
East to central Asia and southwards across the
Arabian Peninsula to north-eastern Africa (Sindaco
et al., 2013). South-eastern Europe, the Eastern
Mediterranean and the Levant are occupied by two
species, Platyceps collaris (Müller, 1878) and Platyceps
najadum (Eichwald, 1831). Morphological data
indicate that these two species are distinct from other
congeners in having unpaired apical pits (Schätti
et al., 2014), and genetic evidence supports their sister
relationship (Schätti & Utiger, 2001; Schätti, 2004).
The taxonomic history of P. collaris has been
turbulent. It was originally described as a subspecies
(originally a variety) of Zamenis dahlii (Fitzinger,
1826) (currently Platyceps najadum) in the late 19th
century on the basis of two specimens, an adult male
from Beirut, Lebanon [Naturhistorisches Museum,
Basel, Switzerland (NHMB) 1166], and a juvenile from
the vicinity of Tel Aviv, Israel (NHMB 1167; Müller,
1878; Schätti et al., 2001). In the beginning of the
20th century, another subspecies (originally a variety),
Zamenis dahlii rubriceps Venzmer, 1919, was described
from the Taurus Mountains in southern Turkey
[Venzmer, 1919; between Pozanti and Tarsus (37°12′N,
34°48′E) according to Schätti et al., 2001]. The colubrid
genera were later revised by Inger & Clark (1943), and
the genus Platyceps was proposed for several Eurasian
racers, including Coluber najadum (Eichwald, 1831).
However, most subsequent authors did not follow
this adjustment and applied the genus name Coluber
Linnaeus, 1758 to most Eurasian racers (e.g. Mertens &
Wermuth, 1960; Schätti, 1993). The trinomen Coluber
najadum rubriceps was used until Baran (1976)
elevated Coluber rubriceps to a full species. Rehák
(1985) described specimens from the Black Sea coast
of Bulgaria as a distinct subspecies, Coluber rubriceps
thracius Rehák, 1985, which was characterized by its
low number of ventral and subcaudal scales and a
relatively short tail. The type series of 11 specimens was
originally placed in the collection of the Department of
Systematic Zoology (currently Department of Zoology),
Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (DZCHU).
Owing to organizational changes at the department,
the specimens were transferred to the herpetological
collections of the National Museum in Prague (NMP)
in 2014, where they are deposited under museum
catalogue numbers NMP-P6V 75257 (holotype), NMP-
P6V 75258, 75259/1–5 and 75260–62 (paratypes;
Table 1). One paratype was sent to Bonn [Zoologisches
Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK)],
where it is catalogued under the number ZFMK 46091
(Böhme, 2014).
In a detailed taxonomic treatment, Schätti et al.
(2001) revised the taxonomy of Coluber collaris (Müller,
1878) and C. rubriceps. They recognized these two taxa
to be conspecific, which resulted in the relegation of the
name C. rubriceps to a junior synonym of C. collaris.
The authors also designated the adult male specimen
from Beirut as a lectotype of the species. With respect
to the subspecies C. r. thracius, Schätti et al. (2001)
pointed out that Rehák (1985) based his comparisons
on published data instead of examining the specimens
himself. Also, the variance of the diagnostic characters
of C. r. thracius falls within the range of Asian
populations according to Schätti et al. (2001). Based
on these grounds, they synonymized the subspecies
C. r. thracius with the nominotypical one, which
resulted in the species becoming monotypic. This has
been followed by most recent authors (Sindaco et al.,
2013; Wallach et al., 2014; Geniez, 2018), although
some still use the subspecific designation (Stojanov
et al., 2011).
The last nomenclatural adjustment of the species
had stemmed from the phylogenetic results of Schätti
& Utiger (2001), who confirmed earlier findings of
Inger & Clark (1943) and placed the Eurasian racers,
including C. collaris and C. najadum, in the genus
Platyceps.
The distribution of P. collaris, as currently
recognized, spans from south-eastern Bulgaria along
the entire Mediterranean coast of Turkey through the
Mediterranean part of Syria and Lebanon to Israel
and western Jordan (Sindaco et al., 2013; Geniez,
2018). Isolated populations have been recorded from
central and southern Anatolia (Baran, 1982; İğci et al.,
2015), but the identification of these specimens needs
to be verified because the localities are geographically
disparate from the rest of the range and lie well within
the range of the closely related and morphologically
similar P. najadum.
In this paper, we explore the genetic diversity and
phylogeography of P. collaris across its entire range
using a multilocus dataset of three mitochondrial
and three nuclear markers. Using a new approach of
multistep polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Illumina
amplicon sequencing, we sequence a fragment of the
cytochrome b (cytb) mitochondrial gene of the holotype
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 657
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
and eight paratypes of the nominal taxon Coluber
rubriceps thracius. We conduct a species distribution
modelling analysis for the present climatic conditions and
conditions during the last 3 Myr to assess the limits of the
current potential distribution for the species, its historical
range dynamics and location of potential refugia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sampling, Dna extraction anD amplification of
recent material
For the phylogenetic analysis, we assembled a dataset
of 35 samples of P. collaris from 26 localities in
Bulgaria, Israel, Syria and Turkey, covering the entire
range of the species (Table 1). We supplemented this
dataset with GenBank sequences of three individuals,
two from Israel and one from Jordan (Schätti & Utiger,
2001; Nagy et al., 2004).
Genomic DNA was extracted from 96% ethanol-
preserved tissue samples using an Invisorb Spin
Tissue Kit (STRATEC), following the manufacturer’s
instructions. We PCR-amplified six genetic markers:
three from the mitochondrial DNA [12S ribosomal
RNA (12S), cytochrome b (cytb) and cytochrome c
oxidase I (coi)] and three from the nuclear DNA
[oocyte maturation factor MOS (cmos), neurotrophin-3
(nt3) and recombination activating gene 1 (rag1)].
We used the following primer pairs and annealing
temperatures for the amplifications: for 12S, the
primers were 12S268 and 12S916 (Schätti & Utiger,
2001), and the annealing temperature was 65 °C; for
cytb, L14910 and H16064 (Burbrink et al., 2000) and
46 °C; for coi, COIb and COIbdeg (Schätti & Utiger,
2001; Utiger et al., 2002) and 56 °C; for cmos, S77 and
S78 (Lawson et al., 2005) and 53 °C; for nt3, F3 and R4
(Noonan & Chippindale, 2006) and 50 °C; and for rag1,
R13 and R18 (Groth & Barrowclough, 1999) and 58 °C.
The PCRs contained 0.2 µM of each primer, 7.5 µL of
2× QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit, 1.5 µL of genomic
DNA (concentration ~30 ng/µL) and double-distilled
H2O to a total volume of 15 µL. The PCR products
were purified with calf intestine alkaline phosphatase
and exonuclease I (New England Biolabs, Ipswich,
MA, USA) and Sanger sequenced along both strands
using the PCR primers in Macrogen Europe (The
Netherlands). Sequences were checked and contigs
assembled in GENEIOUS v.11 (Kearse et al., 2012).
Sampling, Dna extraction anD amplification
of the type SpecimenS of Coluber
rubriCeps thraCius
We sampled ten individuals from the type series of
Coluber rubriceps thracius, the holotype and nine
paratypes (Table 1). The museum samples were
handled in a specialized non-invasive laboratory
designed for work with rare DNA to prevent
contamination (Institute of Vertebrate Biology of
the Academy of Sciences, Studenec, Czech Republic).
DNA was extracted using Invisorb Spin Forensic Kit
(STRATEC). Concentration of samples was measured
on a Qubit 1.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit. To obtain DNA
sequences of the type specimens, we modified the
rodent-based DNA mini-barcoding protocol for the
Illumina platform that targets a short cytb fragment
(Galan et al., 2012; Bryja et al., 2014). The mini-
barcode is a fragment of 148 bp, a length short enough
to amplify in samples with fragmented or degraded
DNA (Galan et al. 2012). For the library preparation,
we used a three-step PCR. All PCRs contained 0.4 µM
of each primer, 5 µL (7.5 µL for the third PCR) of
2× QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Kit, 1.0–1.5 µL of DNA
(concentration 0.01–3.00 ng/µL) and double-distilled
H2O to a total volume of 10 µL (for the first and second
PCR) and 15 µL (for the third PCR). The PCRs were
initiated by a denaturation step of 94 °C for 15 min,
followed by 15–25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for
30 s, annealing at 45 °C for 45 s and an extension at
72 °C for 30 s, followed by a final extension step at
72 °C for 10 min. All PCRs were prepared in duplicates.
In the first PCR of 25 cycles, we amplified the target
region with short specific primers, L15411_modif
(GAYAAAATYYCHTTYCACCC) and H15553_modif
(GTAGGCRAAYAGGAARTATCA). The product of the
first PCR was then used as a template for the second
PCR of 20 cycles, for which the primers were elongated
at the 5′ end: L15411_modif_F_nextera (TCGTCGG
CAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGAYAAAA
TYYCHTTYCACCC) and H15553_modif_R_nextera
(GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGAC
AGGTAGGCRAAYAGGAARTATCA). The template
for the third PCR of 15 cycles was the product of
the second PCR. Primers for this reaction contained
Illumina adaptors with a unique combination of
barcodes/tags for each sample. After the three-step
amplification, we visualized the products on a 1.5%
agarose gel and measured the gel band intensity with
genoSo ft software (VWR International, Belgium).
The concentration of all samples was measured
with a fluorometer (Qubit 1.0) and purity with a
spectrophotometer (DS-11; DeNovix Inc.). All samples
were then diluted to be of an equimolar concentration
(~100 ng/µL). This library was purified using Agencourt
SPRIselect (Beckman Coulter) and sequenced using
MiSeq Illumina at CEITEC (Masaryk University,
Brno, Czech Republic). Sequences were demultiplexed
based on the unique tags. Primers were cut off and
low-quality reads filtered out as follows: sequences
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
658 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Table 1. Material used for the genetic analysis
mtDNA nDNA
Taxon Voucher Sample Specimen status 12S cytb coi cmos nt3 rag1 Locality Latitude Longitude
Platyceps
collaris
– DJ7739 MT856882 MT862657 MT862569 MT862592 MT862617 MT862640 Bulgaria,
Sveti Vlas (1)
42.725 27.766
P. collaris – DJ1405 MT856879 MT862654 MT862566 MT862589 MT862614 MT862638 Bulgaria,
Sozopol (2)
42.397 27.703
P. collaris – DJ6132 MT856881 MT862656 MT862568 MT862591 MT862616 – Bulgaria,
Sozopol (3)
42.395 27.689
P. collaris – DJ607 MT856883 MT862658 MT862570 MT862593 MT862618 MT862641 Bulgaria,
Ropotamo (5)
42.305 27.728
P. collaris – DJ1417 MT856880 MT862655 MT862567 MT862590 MT862615 MT862639 Bulgaria,
Sinemorec (7)
42.071 27.963
P. collaris – DJ2478 MT856884 MT862659 MT862571 MT862594 MT862619 MT862642 Israel,
Hermon (22)
33.296 35.762
P. collaris MCCI R-0649 R649 MT856885 – MT862572 MT862595 MT862620 – Israel,
Haifa (23)
32.806 35.007
P. collaris MHNG 2447.74 Schatti1 AY039133 – AY039171 – – – Israel,
Tel Aviv (25)
32.327 34.855
P. collaris MHNG 2447.75 Schatti2 AY039157 – AY039195 – – – Israel,
Tel Aviv (25)
32.327 34.855
P. collaris TAU.R15955 TAU.
R15955
MT856886 – – – – – Israel, Yizre’el
Valley (24)
32.72 35.14
P. collaris TAU.R16921 TAU.
R16921
MT856887 MT862660 – MT862596 MT862621 – Israel, Nezer
Sereni (26)
31.922 34.822
P. collaris TAU.R16927 TAU.
R16927
MT856888 MT862661 – MT862597 MT862622 – Israel,
Shomeron (28)
32.517 35.382
P. collaris HLMD J14 Nagy – AY486922 – AY486946 – – Jordan (27)
P. collaris NMP-P6V 70502 JIR187 MT856889 MT862662 MT862573 MT862598 MT862623 – Syria, 2 km N
of Seydnaya (20)
33.717 36.372
P. collaris NMP-P6V 70503 JIR188 MT856890 MT862663 MT862574 MT862599 MT862624 – Syria, E of
Utaibeh (21)
33.506 36.627
P. collaris – DJ8209 MT856903 MT862685 MT862587 MT862612 MT862636 – Turkey,
Bozdağ-
Ödemiş (8)
38.367 28.103
P. collaris – DJ8198 MT856892 MT862674 MT862576 MT862601 MT862626 MT862644 Turkey,
10 km N
of Saimbeyli (15)
38.061 36.149
P. collaris – DJ8202 MT856896 MT862678 MT862580 MT862605 MT862630 MT862648 Turkey,
Temürağa (16)
38.046 36.586
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 659
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
mtDNA nDNA
Taxon Voucher Sample Specimen status 12S cytb coi cmos nt3 rag1 Locality Latitude Longitude
P. collaris – DJ8203 MT856897 MT862679 MT862581 MT862606 MT862631 MT862649 Turkey,
Temürağa (16)
38.046 36.586
P. collaris – DJ8197 MT856891 MT862673 MT862575 MT862600 MT862625 MT862643 Turkey,
Gürümze (14)
38.042 35.811
P. collaris – DJ8206 MT856900 MT862682 MT862584 MT862609 MT862634 MT862652 Turkey,
Suna Plateau
(13)
37.993 35.397
P. collaris – DJ8207 MT856901 MT862683 MT862585 MT862610 Turkey,
Işıklı (9)
37.832 27.799
P. collaris – DJ8200 MT856894 MT862676 MT862578 MT862603 MT862628 MT862646 Turkey,
Ömerli (12)
37.535 34.875
P. collaris – DJ8205 MT856899 MT862681 MT862583 MT862608 MT862633 MT862651 Turkey,
Ceyhan (18)
36.895 35.916
P. collaris – DJ8199 MT856893 MT862675 MT862577 MT862602 MT862627 MT862645 Turkey,
Küplüce (19)
36.757 37.236
P. collaris – DJ8201 MT856895 MT862677 MT862579 MT862604 MT862629 MT862647 Turkey,
Kaldırım (17)
36.674 35.525
P. collaris – DJ8208 MT856902 MT862684 MT862586 MT862611 MT862635 MT862653 Turkey,
Erdemli (11)
36.639 34.340
P. collaris – DJ8204 MT856898 MT862680 MT862582 MT862607 MT862632 MT862650 Turkey,
Bozyazı-
Anamur (10)
36.097 33.042
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75259/1
(DZCHU 435)
CRT01 Paratype of
Coluber
rubriceps
thracius
– MT862664 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75259/2
(DZCHU 436)
CRT02 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862665 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75257
(DZCHU 433)
CRT04 Holotype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862666 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75259/5
(DZCHU 437)
CRT05 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– – – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75259/4
(DZCHU 438)
CRT06 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862667 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
Table 1. Continued
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
660 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
mtDNA nDNA
Taxon Voucher Sample Specimen status 12S cytb coi cmos nt3 rag1 Locality Latitude Longitude
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75258
(DZCHU 441)
CRT12 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862669 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75259/3
(DZCHU 439)
CRT13 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862670 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75262
(DZCHU 440)
CRT14 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862671 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75260
(DZCHU 442)
CRT15 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862672 – – – – Bulgaria,
Arkutino (4)
42.323 27.738
P. collaris NMP-P6V 75261
(DZCHU 443)
CRT11 Paratype of
C. r. thracius
– MT862668 – – – – Bulgaria,
Ahtopol (6)
42.098 27.917
Platyceps
najadum
MCCI R-1399 R1399 MT856904 MT862686 MT862588 MT862613 MT862637 – Armenia,
Khosrov
Reserve
39.968 44.951
Telescopus
dhara
– CN10774 MK372075 MK373064 – MK373173 MK373244 MK373213 Oman, Wadi
Ayoun
17.253 53.894
Telescopus
fallax
ZMHRU 2012_103 2012_103 MK372088 MK373073 – MK373186 MK373253 MK373222 Turkey,
Şanlıurfa
37.212 37.969
Telescopus
obtusus
TMHC841 TMHC841 MK372104 MK373090 – MK373202 MK373269 MK373237 Somalia,
9 km SE of
Boorama
9.86 43.244
Telescopus
pulcher
NMP-P6V 75609 TMHC843 MK372105 MK373092 – MK373204 MK373271 MK373239 Somalia,
15 km SE of
Sheikh
9.825 45.29
The sample column refers to codes shown in the Supporting Information (Figs S1–S4). Numbers in parentheses in the locality column show locality numbers as given in Figures 1 and 2. Collection
acronyms are as follows: DZCHU, Department of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; HLMD, Hessisches Landesmuseum, Darmstadt, Germany; MCCI, Museo Civico di Storia
Naturale di Carmagnola, Torino, Italy; MHNG, Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Genève, Switzerland; NMP-P6V, National Museum in Prague, Czech Republic; TAU.R, Steinhardt Museum of Natural
History, Tel Aviv, Israel; TMHC, Tomas Mazuch herpetological collection (private), Dříteč, Czech Republic; ZMHRU, Zoology Museum of Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey. GenBank accessions of
sequences newly produced for this study are those starting with ‘MT’.
Table 1. Continued
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 661
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
containing more than two expected sequencing errors
were eliminated; then we used the dada2 denoising
algorithm (https://benjjneb.github.io/dada2/) for
correction of sequencing errors in the quality-filtered
dataset. Only variants with a minimum coverage of
four sequences per variant and those that occurred in
both duplicates were used for a BLAST analysis.
phylogenetic analySeS
The six genetic markers were aligned independently
with MAFFT v.7 (Katoh et al., 2019) using the default
settings. No stop codons were found in the alignments
of the protein-coding genes (cytb, coi, cmos, nt3 and
rag1), indicating that no pseudogenes were amplified.
The final alignments had the following lengths:
12S, 633 bp; cytb, 1072 bp; coi, 594 bp; cmos, 567 bp;
nt3, 486 bp; and rag1, 1009 bp. We concatenated all
markers in an alignment of a total length of 4361 bp.
Platyceps najadum and four species of Telescopus
Wagler, 1830 were used as outgroup taxa based on
published evidence (Table 1; Zheng & Wiens, 2016).
Phylogenetic analyses were conducted by two
means: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian
inference (BI). For the ML analysis, we used raxml
v.7.3 (Stamatakis, 2006). The concatenated alignment
was partitioned by gene, and the GTRGAMMA model
was used for all partitions. A heuristic search included
100 random addition replicates and 1000 thorough
bootstrap pseudo-replicates. Identical haplotypes
were retained in the analysis to assess intraspecific
variability. The Bayesian analysis ran in BEAST v.2.5.2
(Bouckaert et al., 2014). The dataset was partitioned
by gene, and heterozygous positions in the nuclear
markers were coded using International Union of Pure
and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) ambiguity codes. The
best evolutionary substitution models were estimated
using the reversible-jump algorithm (RB; Bouckaert
et al., 2013) with four exponentially distributed rate
categories (+Γ; mean = 1) and the shape parameter
estimated. The RB algorithm estimates substitution
models alongside the phylogeny without the need for
a priori selection. The parameter for the proportion
of invariable sites (+I) was not estimated given
its correlation with the +Γ parameter, resulting in
inadequate models when both +Γ and +I are included
(Sullivan et al., 1999; Mayrose et al., 2005). Given that
the dataset focused on intraspecific diversification,
we did not assume the substitution rate to vary
substantially throughout the tree and, as a result, we
used a strict clock model with lognormally distributed
priors (mean = 1, SD = 1.25) for all partitions and a
coalescent constant population tree prior. The analysis
ran three times for 5 × 107 Markov chain Monte
Carlo generations sampled every 25 000 generations,
producing a set of 2000 posterior trees. We discarded
10% of trees as burn-in after determining that the
effective sample size (ESS) values of all parameters
exceeded the recommended value of 200 using
TRACER v.1.6 (Rambaut et al., 2014), and ensuring
that convergence and stationarity had been reached
by assuring that parameter values in the independent
runs plateaued at similar values. Tree files from the
three runs were combined using logcombiner, and
a maximum clade credibility tree was identified using
treeannotator (both programs are from the BEAST
package). Nodes were considered supported when they
received a Bayesian posterior probability (pp) ≥ 0.95
and ML bootstrap ≥ 70. All phylogenetic analyses ran
through the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al.,
2010). To inspect the influence of the fast-evolving
mitochondrial markers on the tree topology visually,
we ran the same analyses as described above (both
ML and BI) with a concatenated dataset of the three
mitochondrial genes. Together with the haplotype
networks (see two paragraphs below), this was meant
to assess the extent to which the variation in the
nuclear markers contributes to the topology of the tree.
We also constructed a phylogenetic network
among the P. collaris samples using Spl i tS tree
v.4.15.1 (Huson & Bryant, 2006), with the Neighbor-
Net algorithm (Bryant & Moulton, 2004). Phylogenetic
networks are useful in that they can help to visualize
reticulate relationships among samples and detect
hybrid individuals. We used the alignment of all
six markers concatenated as an input. The nuclear
loci were phased as described below, and the
mitochondrial markers were duplicated to match
the phased nuclear samples. Outgroups were not
included in this analysis, nor were the short cytb
sequences of the C. r. thracius type specimens. We
used 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess support for
the network groups. We tested individual nuclear loci
for recombination using the φ statistic implemented
in SplitStree (Bruen et al., 2006).
Intraspecific relationships at the level of individual
genes were assessed by reconstructing haplotype
networks. Heterozygous positions present in the
alignments of the three nuclear loci were resolved by
phasing. We used SeqphaSe (Flot, 2010) to convert
input files and PHASE (Stephens et al., 2001) to
reconstruct the gametic phases, with the probability
threshold set to 0.7 (Harrigan et al., 2008). Networks
were constructed with the TCS algorithm (Clement
et al., 2000) as implemented in POPART (Leigh &
Bryant, 2015). For the cytb gene network, we used the
148-bp-long alignment that included sequences of the
C. r. thracius types.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
662 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Uncorrected genetic distances (p-distances) for
the mitochondrial genes were calculated in MEGA7
(Kumar et al., 2016).
moDelling the potential SpecieS DiStribution
in the preSent anD in the paSt
We compiled a dataset of distribution records by
searching published sources, museum catalogues, public
biodiversity databases and from our own fieldwork. The
final set totalled 539 georeferenced records that covered
the known range of the species densely. However, the
records varied considerably in their geographical
accuracy (0.005–55 km), and the less accurate ones
might affect model performance. We therefore selected
only records with an accuracy of ≤ 2 km. For this reason,
the outlying localities in central Anatolia and by the
Syrian border could not be included. Also, we removed
duplicates and included only records collected after
1980 (Supporting Information, Table S1).
As a background for modelling in present conditions,
we selected an area within 200 km of the species
range, as presented by Roll et al. (2017), from which
we cropped countries where the species has never
been recorded: Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Romania, Saudi
Arabia and the Greek Aegean Sea islands. To avoid
model bias caused by high densities of records in
certain regions, we thinned the dataset using the
spThin R package (Aiello-Lammens et al., 2015). We
tested three minimum distance radii to separate
any two records: 5, 20 and 50 km. They all produced
comparable models, and we show results only for the
5 km model. The thinning ran ten times, and each run
produced a different dataset of 90 records. These were
used as independent random replicates. We did not
develop independent models for the two clades found
within P. collaris because their genetic differentiation
is shallow, especially when compared with the genetic
differentiation between P. collaris and its sister species,
P. najadum (see Results below); thus, we assumed
their ecological niches to be similar.
As input variables, we used the 19 BioClim
variables (CHELSA; Karger et al., 2017), elevation
slope and land cover (GlobCover 2009 2.3; European
Space Agency; http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.
php) and tested them for collinearity using Pearson’s
r coefficient in enmtoo lS (Warren et al., 2010).
Based on the correlation matrix, we selected only
the uncorrelated (r < 0.75) and more biologically
meaningful variables. The final set of variables was
as follows: elevation, slope, land cover, Bio2 (mean
diurnal temperature range), Bio4 (temperature
seasonality), Bio8 (mean temperature of wettest
quarter), Bio9 (mean temperature of driest quarter),
Bio16 (precipitation of wettest quarter) and Bio17
(precipitation of driest quarter).
We used the maximum entropy approach
implemented in maxent v.3.3 (Phillips et al., 2006) to
develop the model and to assess the importance of each
input variable. maxent ran with the following settings
(other than default): random seed, replicated run
type = cross validate and maximum iterations = 5000.
We ran ten replicates for each of the ten thinned
datasets, thus producing 100 models. In each run, 10%
of records were randomly selected as test points.
The area under the receiver-operating characteristic
curve (AUC) value of each model was taken as a
measure of the model accuracy. Models with AUC > 0.8
were considered to perform well (Araújo et al., 2005).
To test whether the predictive models performed better
than random, we generated 100 null models based on
100 sets of 90 records randomly distributed in the
background of the model. The probabilistic models
were converted to binary maps of potential presence/
absence using two thresholds, a ten-percentile training
presence threshold and maximum training sensitivity
plus specificity threshold (Jiménez-Valverde & Lobo,
2007; Worth et al., 2014). The resulting areas of the
species potential presence were largely overlapping for
the two thresholds, and we show results for the latter.
All spatial analyses for the current conditions were
done at the scale of 30 arc s.
Besides modelling the potential distribution of
P. collaris in current climatic and topographical
conditions, we projected the model to four past periods,
which were: the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM;
~21 kya), the Last Interglacial (LIG; ~130 kya), the
mid-Pleistocene (~787 kya) and the mid-Pliocene
(~3.2 Mya). We only used the BioClim variables for
the past projections, and Bio2 was excluded because
it was not available for all the past periods. Past
climatic data were downloaded collectively from
the PaleoClim database (Brown et al., 2018), with
the following original sources: Karger et al. (2017)
for the LGM; Otto-Bliesner et al. (2006) for the LIG;
Brown et al. (2018) for the mid-Pleistocene; and Hill
(2015) for the mid-Pliocene. The background onto
which the models were projected had to be expanded
to account for the different continental outlines in the
past. For this reason, we converted the background that
was used for the current conditions into an envelope,
i.e. a rectangle defined by minima and maxima of the
x- and y-coordinates of the input. The past projections
were all done at a resolution of 2.5 arc min.
RESULTS
Dna amplification
For the fresh material of P. collaris (25 samples) we
produced 133 new DNA sequences of the six markers
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 663
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
analysed, resulting in a genetic data matrix with few
missing data (89% gene sampling).
For the type material of C. r. thracius, we were able
to obtain the targeted 148-bp-long cytb fragment for
nine of the ten specimens. DNA concentrations of
these specimens ranged between 0.01 and 3.42 ng/µL,
and average number of reads generated for them
was 5735 (range 2113–10 302; Table 2). Artefactual
variants and contaminations were identified based
on a BLAST analysis and discarded manually.
One specimen was removed from further analysis
(CRT05) because the reads showed a mix of various
contaminations (predominantly Homo). There were
several synonymous substitutions along the 148 bp
fragment, indicating that the amino acid content of
this gene fragment was similar across all samples.
phylogenetic analySeS
The samples of P. collaris form two well-differentiated
clades in all analyses. One comprises all samples from
Bulgaria (including the types of C. r. thracius), western
Turkey and most samples from southern Turkey
(ML bootstrap = 98/BI pp = 1.00; support values are
given in this order hereafter), and we term it here the
Balkan–Anatolian clade. The other clade comprises
samples from Israel, Jordan and Syria, and we term
it the Levantine clade, although this clade has only
moderate support in the ML analysis (Fig. 1; support
65/1.00; for original ML and BI trees, see Supporting
Information, Figs S1, S2, respectively). Relationships
within both clades remain unresolved owing to low
branch support. The position of sample DJ8199, from
a locality in extreme southern Turkey (locality 19 in
Fig. 1), differs in the two analyses. It was reconstructed
and supported as sister to the Bulgarian and other
Turkish samples in the ML analysis (support 74), but
the BI analysis recovers it as sister to the Levantine
clade (support 0.94). Both support values are on the
edge of interpretability, but the haplotype networks
constructed for each marker independently show
the sample to be closer to the Levantine clade in its
mitochondrial DNA, whereas the nuclear markers are
more similar to the Balkan–Anatolian clade (networks
in Fig. 1). When only mitochondrial markers are
analysed, topologies of the ML and BI trees remain
similar to those of the complete dataset, including
the varying position of sample DJ8199 (Supporting
Information, Figs S3, S4). The haplotype networks
clearly differentiate the two clades described above,
but the nuclear ones show a certain degree of allele
sharing.
The phylogenetic network analysis resulted in
similar groups to those recovered in the ML and BI
analyses (Fig. 2). The reciprocal monophyly of the
Balkan–Anatolian and Levantine clade is strongly
supported (bootstrap 99.9). Sample DJ8199, whose
phylogenetic position varied in the ML and BI analysis,
is clustered at the base of the Levantine clade. No signs
of recombination are detected for the three nuclear loci
(P-values ranging between 0.68 and 1.00).
Genetic p-distances between the Balkan–Anatolian
and Levantine clades are (±SD): 1.3 ± 0.2% in 12S,
2.2 ± 0.2% in cytb and 1.6 ± 0.2% in coi. Genetic
diversity within the Balkan–Anatolian clade is 0.2% in
12S, 0.6% in cytb and 0.3% in coi; within the Levantine
clade it is 0.3% in 12S, 0.7% in cytb and 0.4% in coi.
Genetic distances of P. collaris to its sister species
P. najadum are 10.6 ± 0.3% in 12S, 11.2 ± 0.3% in cytb
10.8 ± 0.2% in coi.
Table 2. Type specimens of Coluber rubriceps thracius included in the genetic analysis
Voucher Sample DNA concentration (ng/µL) BLAST results Number of reads after filtering
First coverage Second coverage
NMP-P6V 75259/1 CRT01 0.038 Platyceps collaris 2113 3988
NMP-P6V 75259/2 CRT02 1.08 P. collaris 3022 6351
NMP-P6V 75257 CRT04 2.61 P. collaris 6405 6817
NMP-P6V 75259/5 CRT05 0.038 Contamination 4208 6372
NMP-P6V 75259/4 CRT06 0.128 P. collaris 7015 8626
NMP-P6V 75261 CRT11 < 0.01 P. collaris 6272 5512
NMP-P6V 75258 CRT12 3.42 P. collaris 4546 6947
NMP-P6V 75259/3 CRT13 < 0.01 P. collaris 3349 5910
NMP-P6V 75262 CRT14 2.07 P. collaris 3018 5019
NMP-P6V 75260 CRT15 < 0.01 P. collaris 8910 10 302
The DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 1.0 fluorometer (Qubit High Sensitivity Kit). Results of the BLAST search showed that one of
the specimens was contaminated by human DNA. The columns headed ‘Number of reads after filtering’ show the total number of sequences obtained
from the two independent duplicates.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
664 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
SpecieS DiStribution moDelling
Species distribution models of all replicates
performed well, with AUC values ranging between
0.8779 and 0.8905 (mean = 0.8864). The standard
deviations of the models are low (0.0385–0.0457;
mean = 0.0429), indicating model stability
regardless of the input data. Models based on real
data performed significantly better than null models
(AUC range = 0.649–0.762; mean = 0.705). The main
environmental predictors explaining the distribution
of P. collaris are Bio4 (47.1% contribution averaged
over the ten random thinning replicates, range
45.9–49.3%), Bio2 (mean contribution 22.4%,
range 20.5–23.6%) and Bio17 (mean contribution
10.6%, range 10.0–10.9%; for the contribution of all
variables and their response curves, see Supporting
Information, Fig. S5). The predicted distribution
of suitable habitat spans from south-eastern
Bulgaria and north-western Turkey in a narrow
band continuously along the Turkish Mediterranean
coast all the way to the coast of Syria and further
across Lebanon to Israel and Jordan. The suitable
habitat is rarely found > 200 km inland from the
Mediterranean coast, and especially in southern
Turkey it is formed by a considerably narrow coastal
zone (Figs 1, 3).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree resulting from the Bayesian inference (BI) analysis of three mitochondrial and three nuclear
genes concatenated. Nodes were considered supported when Bayesian posterior probability was ≥ 0.95 and maximum
likelihood (ML) bootstrap values ≥ 70. Lengths of branches connecting the split between Platyceps collaris and Platyceps
najadum and the crown nodes of those species are not proportional to the rest of the tree and the scale, which is indicated
by their partial transparency. The two clades, the Balkan–Anatolian and the Levantine, are highlighted in the tree with the
red and green shading, respectively. Four species of Telescopus used to root the tree are not shown. Each tree tip is connected
by a dashed line with the locality of its sample, which is marked by a number (for details, see Table 1). Type localities are
marked with stars: P. collaris collaris in green, P. collaris rubriceps in white and Coluber rubriceps thracius in pink. The
potential current distribution of P. collaris based on the species distribution model with the maximum training sensitivity plus
specificity threshold applied is shown in blue. Haplotype networks reconstructed for the six markers are on the right. Circles
are colour coded according to the clade assignment, and their size is proportional to the number of individuals. Lines represent
mutational steps. The network for the cytb gene was constructed using the 148-bp-long fragment that was available for the
types of Coluber rubriceps thracius. The position of sample DJ8199 from locality 19, whose phylogenetic placement differed in
the maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses, is marked with the locality number in each network.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 665
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Projections of the suitable conditions into the past
show that certain parts of the range of P. collaris have
been stable since the mid-Pliocene. The overall extent
of suitable habitat was smallest in the mid-Pleistocene,
when it was restricted to the Levant and western
Anatolia, with a thin coastal strip that might have
been a corridor connecting these two refugia. During
the climatic optimum of the LIG, this coastal strip was
much broader and most probably allowed population
connectivity. During the LGM, western Anatolia had
the most suitable conditions, whereas the southern
Levant was mostly unsuitable. Since the LGM, the
western and southern Anatolian part of the suitable
area contracted noticeably, whereas it expanded
considerably into the southern Levant (Fig. 3).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we applied a multidisciplinary approach
to disentangle the phylogeographical structure, genetic
diversity and distribution dynamics of a racer snake,
Platyceps collaris. We used a multilocus genetic dataset
generated by Sanger sequencing in combination
with a newly developed method for amplifying and
Illumina sequencing short DNA barcodes for museum
specimens, which often suffer from DNA fragmentation
and degradation. The main advantage of this approach
is that it allows separation of individual reads of each
sequence and exclusion of those that are obviously
contaminated, typically by human DNA (Galan et al.,
2012), which also happened with one of our samples.
The biggest potential of this method is, in our view, that
it allows an alignment-based placement of important
specimens (e.g. types, extinct populations) within the
phylogenetic context to resolve outstanding taxonomic
or conservation questions.
intraSpecific genetic DiverSification
Platyceps collaris is endemic to the Eastern
Mediterranean, a region that experienced intense
Figure 2. Phylogenetic network from SplitStree, showing the reticulate relationships within the two clades of Platyceps
collaris, the Balkan–Anatolian clade (red) and the Levantine clade (green). Numbers in circles are locality numbers shown
in Figure 1 and detailed in Table 1. Bootstrap support values for major nodes ≥ 70 are indicated. The specimen depicted is
from Ropotamo, Bulgaria.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
666 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
phylogeographical research on squamates in the past
decade that has often resulted in uncovering hidden
genetic diversity or even cryptic species (Moravec
et al., 2011; Bellati et al., 2015; Jandzik et al., 2018;
Kotsakiozi et al., 2018; Jablonski & Sadek, 2019; Šmíd
et al., 2019). The results of all phylogenetic analyses
conducted in the present study show a clear genetic
differentiation of P. collaris into two geographically
well-delineated clades. One, the Balkan–Anatolian
clade, occupies the north-western part of the species
range. It spans from the Black Sea coast in south-
eastern Bulgaria along the Mediterranean coast of
Turkey to the Antakya region at the Turkish–Syrian
border. The second, the Levantine clade, covers the
southern part of the species range from extreme
southern Turkey through Syria to Israel and Jordan.
The two clades are clearly differentiated in their
mitochondrial DNA, but they share some alleles in
the cmos and nt3 nuclear loci. As the networks show,
these shared nuclear alleles are either ancestral or
shared across multiple samples from both clades,
which indicates retention of ancestral polymorphism
rather than them being a result of hybridization. The
boundary between the two clades corresponds well with
the geographical position of the Nur Mountain range in
Hatay Province of south-central Turkey (Fig. 1), which
runs parallel to the Gulf of İskenderun and separates
the Anatolian part of the Eastern Mediterranean from
the Levant. These mountains are part of the so-called
Anatolian Diagonal, a natural and probably the most
important biogeographical barrier in the region, which
has repeatedly been proved effective in separating
closely related taxa (Davis, 1971; Tamar et al., 2015;
Kornilios, 2017; Jandzik et al., 2018; Jablonski et al.,
2019; Jablonski & Sadek, 2019).
Genetic diversity within the Balkan–Anatolian and
Levantine clades is of a comparable magnitude. All
mitochondrial markers show the presence of several
Figure 3. Species distribution models for Platyceps collaris in current conditions (A) and in conditions during the Last
Glacial Maximum (B), the Last Interglacial (C), mid-Pleistocene (D) and mid-Pliocene (E). Black points in A indicate the
records that were used for the species distribution modelling. The bottom right panel shows reconstructions of global
temperature in the last 4 Myr relative to the peak Holocene temperature (Hansen & Sato, 2012), with grey arrows and
dashed lines highlighting the temperature in the time periods used in the present study.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 667
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
substitutions within both clades, and the nuclear loci
also show a considerable degree of variance, despite
their generally slower substitution rates compared
with the mitochondrial genes. Relationships within
these two clades could not be resolved, which was
most probably because the phylogenetic relationships
at this shallow evolutionary depth do not necessarily
form a bifurcating tree but rather a reticulate pattern,
which becomes obvious when they are visualized using
the phylogenetic network (Fig. 2).
DiStribution anD hiStorical range DynamicS
The distribution of P. collaris is well documented
in the literature thanks to the unique appearance
of the snake, although misidentifications with the
sister species, P. najadum, can happen (e.g. Berger-
Dell’Mour, 1986). Although the range of the species
spans a relatively large territory, from south-eastern
Bulgaria to southern Israel and Jordan, the species
distribution modelling analysis shows that the
predicted suitable habitat is found only in a narrow
stretch of land along the Mediterranean coast (Fig. 1).
The potential distribution reaches further inland in
the Levant, even beyond the Dead Sea Rift in Jordan,
but there it is restricted to the Mediterranean ecozone
(Disi, 1996; Disi et al., 2001). The character of the
environmental variables that contribute most to the
potential distribution of the species suggests that
P. collaris prefers areas of low climatic seasonality,
without fluctuating temperatures (Supporting
Information, Fig. S5). For example, the probability of
presence of the species decreases significantly with
increasing elevation. This means that in south-western
Turkey, where the mountains come close to the sea, the
suitable habitat is present only along the immediate
vicinity of the coast.
The Levantine part of the species range corresponds
well to the distribution of the Eastern Mediterranean
conifer–broadleaf forest ecoregion (Dinerstein et al.,
2017), which covers the eastern Mediterranean coastal
zone (Supporting Information, Fig. S6). The ecoregion
forms a narrow coastal strip in southern Turkey, and
it reaches eastwards along the entire length of the
Turkish–Syrian border all the way to the isolated
P. collaris populations. However, these populations lie
well away from the suitable habitat of the species. It
might be that the environmental variables used in the
modelling process did not capture all dimensions of
the biotic requirements of the species and thus failed
to identify these localities to have a suitable habitat.
It is nonetheless interesting that there have not been
more observations of P. collaris in the broadleaf forest
ecoregion along the Turkish–Syrian border. These
eastern localities might represent microclimatic
pockets where the species survives in isolation from the
Mediterranean populations, a hypothesis that could be
addressed easily if the specimens were sequenced and
placed in a phylogenetic framework. More enigmatic in
this respect is the record from central Anatolia, which
is > 200 km away from other records of the species
(İğci et al., 2015). Given that a voucher of the specimen
is catalogued in a collection [Zoology Museum of
Adıyaman University, Turkey (ZMADYU) 2013/57], we
recommend collecting a tissue sample and genotyping
it in order to assess its phylogenetic affinities.
The models of suitable habitat distributions in the
past show that the climatic conditions of the Eastern
Mediterranean have been stable since the Late
Tertiary and suitable for the occurrence of P. collaris.
Despite some oscillations, western and southern
Anatolia and the northern Levant have remained
suitable for the species for the past 3 Myr (Fig. 3).
This contrasts with south-eastern Bulgaria and the
southern Levant, which lacked suitable habitats in
the LGM and mid-Pleistocene. Western Anatolia, one
of the current hotspots for the species distribution,
had a larger extent of suitable habitats in the LGM
and LIG, whereas further in the past its suitability
corresponded more or less to that of the current
conditions. Together with the northern Levant, these
areas might have provided refugia where populations
of P. collaris survived climatically challenging times,
such as the LGM, and from where they subsequently
colonized the rest of the current range. Here, it is of
importance to note that the historical oscillations of
suitable habitats did not necessarily have to lead to
population expansions and contractions for reasons
associated with factors such as dispersal limitations,
competitive exclusion and predation (Peterson, 2011).
However, the genetic evidence that confirmed the
presence of the two distinct clades provides credibility
to the presence of the two refugia. It is therefore likely
that the Anatolia refugium served as a source for the
colonization of the south-eastern Balkans after the
LGM, whereas the south of the Levant was repopulated
from the north, from the Syrian coastal region, as has
been suggested for the genus Lacerta Linnaeus, 1758
(Ahmadzadeh et al., 2013).
SubSpecific taxonomy of platyCeps Collaris
The genetic differentiation between the two P. collaris
clades is, to some degree, mirrored in the morphological
traits. Specimens from Bulgaria (including the types of
Coluber rubriceps thracius) and south-western Turkey
have been shown to have a lower number of ventral
(185–203) and subcaudal scales (79–105) compared
with specimens from the Levant (ventrals, 189–220;
subcaudals, 89–128; Rehák, 1985, 1986; Rehák & Obst,
1993; Schätti et al., 2001). However, the morphological
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
668 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
variability seems to be more of a cline, with specimens
from southern Turkey being intermediate in these
traits. Unfortunately, all authors who have collected
morphological data for P. collaris compared populations
and did not provide values for individual specimens.
For example, Baran (1976) gave only trait means and
variations for specimens from across the species range,
Rehák (1986) compared populations from Bulgaria and
Israel, and Rehák & Obst (1993) compared populations
from Bulgaria with those from Turkey, Israel and Jordan.
The most detailed comparison was provided by Schätti
et al. (2001), who compared the following five geographical
groups: Bulgaria, western Anatolia, southern Anatolia,
Lebanon and north-western Syria. However, as our
results show, southern Anatolia is occupied by both
clades, and the groupings by Schätti et al. (2001) might
have meant that both were represented in this category,
thus obfuscating the potential difference between the
clades. Therefore, future morphological comparison of
ideally genotyped specimens from southern Anatolia
will be necessary to clarify this issue.
Based on the genetic results obtained in the present
study, we are able to draw some conclusions regarding
the subspecific taxonomy of P. collaris. Considering the
phylogeographical structure found within the species,
the parapatry of the two clades and their complete
segregation of mitochondrial haplotypes, the two
clades can be considered distinct subspecies. Given
that the type locality of P. collaris in Beirut falls within
the range of the Levantine clade, this clade retains
the nominotypical name Platyceps collaris collaris
(Müller, 1878).
In the case of the Balkan–Anatolian clade, the name
Zamenis dahlii rubriceps Venzmer, 1919 has priority
over the name Coluber rubriceps thracius Rehák, 1985.
By sequencing the holotype and eight paratypes of
C. r. thracius, we show that they are genetically identical
with all other specimens of P. collaris from Bulgaria
included in the analysis and also with two specimens
from western and southern Turkey. Although we
could not analyse the type material of Zamenis dahlii
rubriceps directly in the present study, we had samples
collected not far away from its type locality that have
proved to represent the Balkan–Anatolian clade. In fact,
the type locality is surrounded by samples of that clade,
and we believe that it is reasonable to assume that, if
genotyped, it would cluster with the Balkan–Anatolian
clade. Therefore, following the principle of priority, we
suggest that this clade should bear the name Platyceps
collaris rubriceps (Venzmer, 1919) comb. nov., and the
name Coluber rubriceps thracius Rehák, 1985 should
be its junior synonym.
Genetic methods have enabled a boom in species
descriptions that is unprecedented since the times
of Linnaeus. Despite this, subspecific taxonomy
shows the opposite trend in squamates (Torstrom
et al., 2014). However, recognition of subspecies
can serve as a useful formalization that reflects
character differentiation (genetic, morphological and
geographical) within species and should be adhered
to (Kindler & Fritz, 2018), especially when there is
congruence between more lines of evidence. In our case,
these congruent lines are the genetic differentiation
between the Levantine clade (P. c. collaris) and the
Balkan–Anatolian clade (P. c. rubriceps), which is
probably a result of different Quaternary refugia used
by the clades. However, morphological differentiation
between the clades needs to be verified.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Roberto Sindaco (Carmagnola Museum,
Italy) and Shai Meiri (Tel Aviv Museum, Israel)
for providing tissue samples and Jana Poláková
(Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia) for
her laboratory work. Dagmar Čížková (Institute of
Vertebrate Biology, Czech Republic), Jakub Kreisinger
(Charles University, Czech Republic) and Boris Tichý
(Central European Institute of Technology [CEITEC],
Czech Republic) kindly helped with the study design
and the analysis of museum samples. The project
was supported and permits issued by the Ministry of
Environment and Water of Bulgaria (permit numbers
656/08.12.2015 and 767/24.01.2019) and TÜBITAK
(The Scientific and Technical Research Council of
Turkey; permit numbers TBAG-104T294 and TBAG-
108T162). The work of J.Š. was supported by the
Czech Science Foundation (GACR, project number
18-15286Y), that of J.Š. and J.M. by the Ministry of
Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2019–2023/6.
VII.b, 00023272), the work of D.V. by the Charles
University (SVV 260571/2020) and the work of D.J. by
the Slovak Research and Development Agency (under
contracts no. APVV-15-0147 and APVV-19-0076).
REFERENCES
Ahmadzadeh F, Flecks M, Rödder D, Böhme W, Ilgaz Ç,
Harris DJ, Engler JO, Üzüm N, Carretero MA. 2013.
Multiple dispersal out of Anatolia: biogeography and
evolution of oriental green lizards. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society 110: 398–408.
Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B,
Anderson RP. 2015. spThin: an R package for spatial
thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological
niche models. Ecography 38: 541–545.
Araújo MB, Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Erhard M. 2005.
Validation of species–climate impact models under climate
change. Global Change Biology 11: 1504–1513.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 669
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Baran I. 1976. Türkiye yılanlarının taksonomik revizyonu ve
coğrafi dağılışları. Türkiye’de Bilimsel Araştırma 9: 1–177.
Baran I. 1982. Zur Taxonomie der Schlangen in Südost- und
Ost-Anatolien. Spixiana 5: 51–59.
Bellati A, Carranza S, Garcia-Porta J, Fasola M,
Sindaco R. 2015. Cryptic diversity within the Anatololacerta
species complex (Squamata: Lacertidae) in the Anatolian
Peninsula: evidence from a multi-locus approach. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 82: 219–233.
Berger-Dell’Mour H. 1986. Zur Herpetofauna des Golan.
Annalen des Naturistorischen Museums in Wien 87: 59–67.
Böhme W. 2014. Herpetology in Bonn. Mannheim: Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde.
Bouckaert R, Alvarado-Mora MV, Pinho JR. 2013.
Evolutionary rates and HBV: issues of rate estimation with
Bayesian molecular methods. Antiviral Therapy 18: 497–503.
Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH,
Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014.
BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary
analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 10: e1003537.
Brown JL, Hill DJ, Dolan AM, Carnaval AC, Haywood AM.
2018. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate
surfaces for global land areas. Scientific Data 5: 180254.
Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D. 2006. A simple and robust
statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination.
Genetics 172: 2665–2681.
Bryant D, Moulton V. 2004. Neighbor-net: an agglomerative
method for the construction of phylogenetic networks.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 255–265.
Bryja J, Mikula O, Šumbera R, Meheretu Y, Aghová T,
Lavrenchenko LA, Mazoch V, Oguge N, Mbau JS,
Welegerima K, Amundala N, Colyn M, Leirs H,
Verheyen E. 2014. Pan-African phylogeny of Mus (subgenus
Nannomys) reveals one of the most successful mammal
radiations in Africa. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14: 256.
Burbrink FT, Lawson R, Slowinski JB. 2000. Mitochondrial
DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat
snake (Elaphe obsoleta): a critique of the subspecies concept.
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 54:
2107–2118.
Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer
program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9:
1657–1659.
Davis P. 1971. Distribution patterns in Anatolia with
particular reference to endemism. In: Davis P, ed. Plant life of
south-west Asia. Edinburgh: Botanical Society of Edinburgh,
15–27.
Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A, Vynne C, Burgess ND,
Wikramanayake E, Hahn N, Palminteri S, Hedao P,
Noss R, Hansen M, Locke H, Ellis EC, Jones B,
Barber CV, Hayes R, Kormos C, Martin V, Crist E,
Sechrest W, Price L, Baillie JEM, Weeden D,
Suckling K, Davis C, Sizer N, Moore R, Thau D, Birch T,
Potapov P, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, de Souza N,
Pintea L, Brito JC, Llewellyn OA, Miller AG, Patzelt A,
Ghazanfar SA, Timberlake J, Klöser H, Shennan-
Farpón Y, Kindt R, Lillesø JB, van Breugel P,
Graudal L, Voge M, Al-Shammari KF, Saleem M.
2017. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the
terrestrial realm. BioScience 67: 534–545.
Disi AM. 1996. A contribution to the knowledge of the
herpetofauna of Jordan. VI. The Jordanian herpetofauna as
a zoogeographic indicator. Herpetozoa 9: 71–81.
Disi AM, Modrý D, Necas P, Rifai L. 2001. Amphibians and
reptiles of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Frankfurt am
Main: Edition Chimaira.
Flot JF. 2010. SeqphaSe: a web tool for interconverting phaSe
input/output files and faSta sequence alignments. Molecular
Ecology Resources 10: 162–166.
Galan M, Pagès M, Cosson JF. 2012. Next-generation
sequencing for rodent barcoding: species identification from
fresh, degraded and environmental samples. PLoS One 7:
e48374.
Geniez P. 2018. Snakes of Europe, North Africa and the Middle
East: a photographic guide. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton
University Press.
Groth JG, Barrowclough GF. 1999. Basal divergences in
birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 115–123.
Hansen JE, Sato M. 2012. Paleoclimate implications for
human-made climate change. In: Berger A, Mesinger F,
Sijacki D, eds. Climate change. Wien: Springer, 21–47.
Harrigan RJ, Mazza ME, Sorenson MD. 2008. Computation
vs. cloning: evaluation of two methods for haplotype
determination. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 1239–1248.
Hill DJ. 2015. The non-analogue nature of Pliocene
temperature gradients. Earth and Planetary Science Letters
425: 232–241.
Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic
networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 23: 254–267.
İğci N, Akman B, Göçmen B, Demirsoy Aİ, Oğuz MA. 2015.
Range extension of four species of snakes (Ophidia: Eirenis,
Pseudocyclophis, Platyceps) in eastern Anatolia. Biharean
Biologist 9: 166–169.
Inger RF, Clark PJ. 1943. Partition of the genus Coluber.
Copeia 13: 141–145.
Jablonski D, Kukushkin OV, Avcı A, Bunyatova S,
Kumlutaş Y, Ilgaz Ç, Polyakova E, Shiryaev K,
Tuniyev B, Jandzik D. 2019. The biogeography of Elaphe
sauromates (Pallas, 1814), with a description of a new rat
snake species. PeerJ 7: e6944.
Jablonski D, Sadek RA. 2019. The species identity and
biogeography of Blanus (Amphisbaenia: Blanidae) in
Lebanon. Zoology in the Middle East 65: 208–214.
Jandzik D, Jablonski D, Zinenko O, Kukushkin OV,
Moravec J, Gvoždík V. 2018. Pleistocene extinctions
and recent expansions in an anguid lizard of the genus
Pseudopus. Zoologica Scripta 47: 21–32.
Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. 2007. Threshold criteria
for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or
presence–absence. Acta Oecologica 31: 361–369.
Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-
Auza RW, Zimmermann NE, Linder HP, Kessler M.
2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land
surface areas. Scientific Data 4: 170122.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
670 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2019. MAFFT online
service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence
choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:
1160–1166.
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M,
Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C,
Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012.
Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop
software platform for the organization and analysis of
sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649.
Kindler C, Fritz U. 2018. Phylogeography and taxonomy of
the barred grass snake (Natrix helvetica), with a discussion
of the subspecies category in zoology. Vertebrate Zoology 68:
253–267.
Kornilios P. 2017. Polytomies, signal and noise: revisiting
the mitochondrial phylogeny and phylogeography of
the Eurasian blindsnake species complex (Typhlopidae,
Squamata). Zoologica Scripta 46: 665–674.
Kornilios P, Thanou E, Lymberakis P, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y,
Leaché A. 2019. Genome-wide markers untangle the
green-lizard radiation in the Aegean Sea and support a rare
biogeographical pattern. Journal of Biogeography 46: 552–567.
Kotsakiozi P, Jablonski D, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Avcı A,
Meiri S, Itescu Y, Kukushkin O, Gvoždík V, Scillitani G,
Roussos SA, Jandzik D, Kasapidis P, Lymberakis P,
Poulakakis N. 2018. Multilocus phylogeny and coalescent
species delimitation in Kotschy’s gecko, Mediodactylus
kotschyi: Hidden diversity and cryptic species. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 125: 177–187.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular
evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets.
Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874.
Kyriazi P, Kornilios P, Nagy ZT, Poulakakis N,
Kumlutaş Y, Ilgaz Ç, Avcı A, Göçmen B, Lymberakis P.
2013. Comparative phylogeography reveals distinct
colonization patterns of Cretan snakes. Journal of
Biogeography 40: 1143–1155.
Lawson R, Slowinski JB, Crother BI, Burbrink FT. 2005.
Phylogeny of the Colubroidea (Serpentes): new evidence from
mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 37: 581–601.
Leigh JW, Bryant D. 2015. POPART: full-feature software
for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and
Evolution 6: 1110–1116.
Mayrose I, Friedman N, Pupko T. 2005. A gamma mixture
model better accounts for among site rate heterogeneity.
Bioinformatics 21: ii151–ii158.
Mertens R, Wermuth H. 1960. Die Amphibien und Reptilien
Europas. Frankfurt am Main: Waldemar Kramer.
Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the
CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic
trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments
Workshop (GCE). New Orleans: IEE, 1–8.
Moravec J, Kratochvíl L, Amr ZS, Jandzik D, Šmíd J,
Gvoždík V. 2011. High genetic differentiation within the
Hemidactylus turcicus complex (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) in the
Levant, with comments on the phylogeny and systematics of
the genus. Zootaxa 2894: 21–38.
Müller F. 1878. Katalog der im Museum und
Universitatskabinet zu Basel aufgestellten Amphibien
und Reptilien nebst Anmerkungen. Verhandlungen der
Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel 6: 561–709.
Nagy ZT, Lawson R, Joger U, Wink M. 2004. Molecular
systematics of racers, whipsnakes and relatives (Reptilia:
Colubridae) using mitochondrial and nuclear markers.
Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research
42: 223–233.
Noonan BP, Chippindale PT. 2006. Dispersal and vicariance:
the complex evolutionary history of boid snakes. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 347–358.
Otto-Bliesner BL, Marshall SJ, Overpeck JT, Miller GH,
Hu A. 2006. Simulating Arctic climate warmth and icefield
retreat in the last interglaciation. Science 311: 1751–1753.
Peterson AT. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic
distributions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University
Press.
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum
entropy modeling of species geographic distributions.
Ecological Modelling 190: 231–259.
Poulakakis N, Kapli P, Kardamaki A, Skourtanioti E,
Göcmen B, Ilgaz Ç, Kumlutaş Y, Avci A, Lymberakis P.
2013. Comparative phylogeography of six herpetofauna
species in Cyprus: late Miocene to Pleistocene colonization
routes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 619–635.
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond A. 2014.
Tracer v1.6. Available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
Rehák I. 1985. Coluber rubriceps thracius ssp. n. from Bulgaria
(Reptilia: Squamata: Colubridae). Věstník Československé
Společnosti Zoologické 49: 276–282.
Rehák I. 1986. Taxonomic evaluation of Coluber rubriceps
(Venzmer, 1919) from Bulgaria. In: Roček Z, ed. Studies in
herpetology: Proceedings of the European Herpetological
Meeting (3rd Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas
Europaea Herpetologica) Prague 1985. Prague: Societas
Europaea Herpetologica, 289–292.
Rehák I, Obst F. 1993. Coluber rubriceps (Venzmer,
1919)-Rötliche Schlanknatter. In: Böhme W, ed. Handbuch
der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Band 3/I Schlangen
(Serpentes) I. Wiesbaden: Aula, 155–166.
Roll U, Feldman A, Novosolov M, Allison A, Bauer AM,
Bernard R, Böhm M, Castro-Herrera F, Chirio L,
Collen B, Colli GR, Dabool L, Das I, Doan TM,
Grismer LL, Hoogmoed M, Itescu Y, Kraus F,
LeBreton M, Lewin A, Martins M, Maza E, Meirte D,
Nagy ZT, de C Nogueira C, Pauwels OSG, Pincheira-
Donoso D, Powney GD, Sindaco R, Tallowin OJS,
Torres-Carvajal O, Trape JF, Vidan E, Uetz P,
Wagner P, Wang Y, Orme CDL, Grenyer R, Meiri S.
2017. The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for
targeted reptile conservation. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:
1677–1682.
Schätti B. 1993. Coluber Linnaeus, 1758–Zornnattern. In:
Böhme W, ed. Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien
Europas 3/I. Wiesbaden: Aula, 69–73.
Schätti B. 2004. A preliminary contribution to Platyceps
najadum (Eichwald, 1831) and systematic status of Coluber
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF COLLARED DWARF RACER 671
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
atayevi Tunijev & Shammakov, 1993 (Reptilia: Squamata:
Colubrinae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 111: 525–538.
Schätti B, Baran I, Maunoir P. 2001. Taxonomie, Morphologie
und Verbreitung der Masken-Schlanknatter Coluber (s. l.)
collaris (Müller, 1878). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 108: 11–30.
Schätti B, Tillack F, Kucharzewski C. 2014. Platyceps
rhodorachis (Ja n, 1863) – a study of the racer genus
Platyceps blyth, 1860 east of the Tigris (Reptilia: Squamata:
Colubridae). Vertebrate Zoology 64: 297–405.
Schätti B, Utiger U. 2001. Hemerophis, a new genus for
Zamenis socotrae Günther, and a contribution to the
phylogeny of Old World racers, whip snakes, and related
genera (Reptilia: Squamata: Colubrinae). Revue Suisse de
Zoologie 108: 919–948.
Sindaco R, Kornilios P, Sacchi R, Lymberakis P. 2014.
Taxonomic reassessment of Blanus strauchi (Bedriaga,
1884) (Squamata: Amphisbaenia: Blanidae), with the
description of a new species from southeast Anatolia
(Turkey). Zootaxa 3795: 311–326.
Sindaco R, Venchi A, Grieco C. 2013. The reptiles of the
Western Palearctic. 2. Annotated checklist and distributional
atlas of the snakes of Europe, North Africa, Middle East and
Central Asia, with an update to the Vol. 1. Latina: Monografie
della Societas Herpetologica Italica–I. Edizioni Belvedere.
Šmíd J, Göçmen B, Crochet P-A, Trape J-F, Mazuch T,
Uvizl M, Nagy ZT. 2019. Ancient diversification,
biogeography, and the role of climatic niche evolution in the
Old World cat snakes (Colubridae, Telescopus). Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 134: 35–49.
Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-
based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and
mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690.
Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. 2001. A new statistical
method for haplotype reconstruction from population data.
American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 978–989.
Stojanov A, Tzankov N, Naumov B. 2011. Die Amphibien
und Reptilien Bulgariens. Frankfurt am Main: Edition
Chimaira.
Sullivan J, Swofford DL, Naylor GJ. 1999. The effect of
taxon sampling on estimating rate heterogeneity parameters
of maximum-likelihood models. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 16: 1347–1347.
Tamar K, Carranza S, in den Bosch H, Sindaco R,
Moravec J, Meiri S. 2015. Hidden relationships and genetic
diversity: Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of the
Levantine lizards of the genus Phoenicolacerta (Squamata:
Lacertidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 91:
86–97.
Torstrom SM, Pangle KL, Swanson BJ. 2014. Shedding
subspecies: The influence of genetics on reptile subspecies
taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 76:
134–143.
Utiger U, Helfenberger N, Schätti B, Schmidt C, Ruf M,
Ziswiler V. 2002. Molecular systematics and phylogeny of
Old and New World ratsnakes, Elaphe Auct., and related
genera (Reptilia, Squamata, Colubridae). Russian Journal of
Herpetology 9: 105–124.
Venzmer G. 1919. Zur Schlangenfauna Süd-Kleinasiens,
speziell des cilicischen Taurus. Archiv für Naturgeschichte,
Berlin 83: 95–122.
Wallach V, Williams KL, Boundy J. 2014. Snakes of the
world: a catalogue of living and extinct species. Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox
for comparative studies of environmental niche models.
Ecography 33: 607–611.
Worth JRP, Williamson GJ, Sakaguchi S, Nevill PG,
Jordan GJ. 2014. Environmental niche modelling fails
to predict Last Glacial Maximum refugia: niche shifts,
microrefugia or incorrect palaeoclimate estimates? Global
Ecology and Biogeography 23: 1186–1197.
Zheng Y, Wiens JJ. 2016. Combining phylogenomic and
supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny
for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes
and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94:
537–547.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s web-site:
Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the maximum likelihood analysis of all genes
concatenated. Bootstrap support values ≥ 60 are shown above branches. Type specimens of Coluber rubriceps
thracius are in red.
Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis of all genes
concatenated. Posterior probability values ≥ 0.90 are shown above branches. Type specimens of Coluber rubriceps
thracius are in red.
Figure S3. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the maximum likelihood analysis of the three
mitochondrial genes concatenated. Bootstrap support values ≥ 60 are shown above branches. Type specimens of
Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
Figure S4. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis of the three
mitochondrial genes concatenated. Posterior probability values ≥ 0.90 are shown above branches. Type specimens
of Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
672 J. ŠMÍD ET AL.
© 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 193, 655–672
Figure S5. Response curves of the environmental variables used to develop the distribution model, showing how
each variable affected the prediction and its relative contribution to the model (averaged over ten runs). Each plot
shows the probability of presence of the species (y-axis) as a function of the environmental predictor value (x-axis).
Red lines show mean responses of ten replicate runs; standard deviations are in blue. The key in the lower right
refers to the categorical land cover variable in the lower left.
Figure S6. Geographical distribution of the Eastern Mediterranean conifer–broadleaf forest ecoregion (Dinerstein
et al., 2017).
Table S1. Locality details of records used for the species distribution modelling and their original sources.
Coordinates from Bulgaria have been truncated to two decimal places for conservation purposes.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/193/2/655/6048377 by Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University user on 30 September 2021
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 1
Supplementary Figures and Table for
Quaternary range dynamics and taxonomy of the Mediterranean collared dwarf racer,
Platyceps collaris (Squamata: Colubridae)
by
Šmíd et al.
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 2
Figure S1. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the ML analysis of all genes
concatenated. Bootstrap support values ≥ 60 are shown above branches. Type specimens of
Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
0.02
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8205
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16921
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8202
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR187
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_R649
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_7739
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT02
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT06
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT13
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_6132
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8206
Platyceps_collaris_Jordan_Nagy
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR15955
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT11
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8208
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti2
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT01
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT12
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8203
Telescopus_obtusus_TMHC841
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_DJ607
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT04
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8207
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti1
Telescopus_dhara_CN10774
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8204
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8201
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT15
Telescopus_pulcher_TMHC843
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR188
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8209
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_2478
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8198
Telescopus_fallax_syriacus_2012_103
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1417
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1405
Platyceps_najadum_R1399
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8197
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT14
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16927
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8200
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8199
99
90
65
98
70
100
86
74
89
100
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 3
Figure S2. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the BI analysis of all genes
concatenated. Posterior probability values ≥ 0.90 are shown above branches. Type specimens
of Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
0.02
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8203
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8209
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT12
Telescopus_obtusus_TMHC841
Platyceps_najadum_R1399
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8205
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8202
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti2
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_R649
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti1
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT06
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16921
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT04
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8207
Telescopus_fallax_syriacus_2012_103
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT15
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8206
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR187
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1417
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_7739
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8208
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8201
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_6132
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT11
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT02
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8199
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT14
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1405
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8197
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8204
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_DJ607
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT13
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR15955
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_2478
Telescopus_dhara_CN10774
Telescopus_pulcher_TMHC843
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8198
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8200
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16927
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT01
Platyceps_collaris_Jordan_Nagy
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR188
1
1
0.94
1
1
1
1
1
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 4
Figure S3. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the ML analysis of the three
mitochondrial genes concatenated. Bootstrap support values ≥ 60 are shown above branches.
Type specimens of Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
0.05
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8206
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16921
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti2
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_7739
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8199
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_6132
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8204
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT14
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_R649
Telescopus_obtusus_TMHC841
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16927
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1405
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8209
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8208
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR187
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1417
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8203
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT13
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8201
Telescopus_pulcher_TMHC843
Telescopus_dhara_CN10774
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT02
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT01
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8200
Platyceps_collaris_Jordan_Nagy
Platyceps_najadum_R1399
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8202
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8205
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT11
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_DJ607
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT15
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti1
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT12
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR188
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT06
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT04
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8207
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8197
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_2478
Telescopus_fallax_syriacus_2012_103
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8198
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR15955
99
100
100
100
60
91
77
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 5
Figure S4. Phylogenetic tree of Platyceps collaris resulting from the BI analysis of the three
mitochondrial genes concatenated. Posterior probability values ≥ 0.90 are shown above
branches. Type specimens of Coluber rubriceps thracius are in red.
0.02
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT13
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1417
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT04
Platyceps_najadum_R1399
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8200
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8202
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti2
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_Schatti1
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8198
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8207
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR15955
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT06
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8203
Telescopus_fallax_syriacus_2012_103
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_6132
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_DJ607
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8197
Telescopus_pulcher_TMHC843
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT01
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8199
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT12
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_1405
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8206
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT14
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8205
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8209
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT15
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8201
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR187
Platyceps_collaris_Bulgaria_7739
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_2478
Telescopus_dhara_CN10774
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT11
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_R649
Telescopus_obtusus_TMHC841
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8208
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16921
Coluber_rubriceps_thracicus_CRT02
Platyceps_collaris_Israel_TAUR16927
Platyceps_collaris_Jordan_Nagy
Platyceps_collaris_Syria_JIR188
Platyceps_collaris_Turkey_8204
0.93
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 6
Figure S5. Response curves of the environmental variables used to develop the distribution
model showing how each variable affected the prediction and its relative contribution to the
model (averaged over 10 runs). Each plot shows the probability of the species’ presence (y axis)
as a function of the environmental predictor value (x axis). Red lines show mean responses of
ten replicate runs, standard deviations are in blue. The legend in the lower right refers to the
categorical land cover variable in the lower left.
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 7
Figure S6. Geographic distribution of the Eastern Mediterranean conifer-broadleaf forest
ecoregion (Dinerstein et al., 2017).
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 8
Table S1. Locality details of records used for the SDM and their original sources. Coordinates
from Bulgaria have been truncated to two decimal places for conservation purposes.
Country
Locality
Latitude
Longitude
Source
Bulgaria
Rezovo
42
27.99
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Sinemorec
42.03
27.95
This study
Bulgaria
42.04
27.99
This study
Bulgaria
Sinemorets
42.05
27.98
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Sinemorets
42.06
27.92
This study
Bulgaria
Ahtopol
42.06
27.95
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Brodilovo
42.11
27.83
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Tsarevo
42.17
27.83
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
42.18
27.75
This study
Bulgaria
Velika
42.19
27.75
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
42.19
27.8
This study
Bulgaria
Primorsko
42.28
27.74
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
42.28
27.75
This study
Bulgaria
Primorsko
42.29
27.74
iNaturalist
Bulgaria
42.3
27.69
This study
Bulgaria
Ropotamo
42.3
27.72
Balcanica.info
Bulgaria
Primorsko
42.3
27.74
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
42.31
27.72
This study
Bulgaria
Primorsko
42.31
27.77
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Arkutino
42.33
27.72
Rehák (1985)
Bulgaria
Sozopol
42.37
27.69
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Sozopol
42.39
27.68
This study
Bulgaria
Sozopol
42.39
27.69
This study
Bulgaria
Sveti vlas
42.71
27.75
This study
Bulgaria
Elenite
42.71
27.81
Panner (2009)
Bulgaria
Sveti Vlas
42.72
27.75
smartbirds.org
Bulgaria
Sveti Vlas
42.72
27.76
This study
Bulgaria
42.73
27.71
This study
Israel
31.61406
34.92282
GBIF
Israel
31.67055
34.57677
GBIF
Israel
31.7424
35.10922
GBIF
Israel
31.74498
35.00052
GBIF
Israel
31.75104
34.87807
GBIF
Israel
31.7621
34.98781
GBIF
Israel
31.76345
34.80309
GBIF
Israel
Jerusalem
31.79367
35.21999
GBIF
Israel
Mt. Scopus
31.79447
35.2439
Schatti et al. (2001)
Israel
31.79454
34.97507
GBIF
Israel
31.91965
34.86479
GBIF
Israel
Southern Coastal Plain, Nezer Sereni
31.922
34.822
This study
Israel
31.93234
34.89118
GBIF
Israel
Miqwe Yisrael
32.0292
34.7814
Schatti et al. (2001)
Israel
32.15777
34.88299
GBIF
Israel
Haifa
32.5241
35.1407
GBIF
Israel
32.58816
35.00289
GBIF
Israel
32.61228
35.5153
GBIF
Israel
32.62401
35.51427
GBIF
Israel
32.66846
35.03896
GBIF
Israel
Mt. Tabor
32.683
35.4
Schatti et al. (2001)
Israel
Yizre’el (Jezreel) Valley, Qiryat Tiv'on
32.72
35.14
This study
Israel
32.83671
35.8023
iNaturalist
Israel
HaZafon
32.89259
35.09821
GBIF
Israel
32.90455
35.74612
GBIF
Israel
32.90545
35.74613
GBIF
Israel
32.91079
35.7622
GBIF
Israel
32.91084
35.74937
GBIF
Israel
32.91266
35.74617
GBIF
Israel
32.93816
35.79532
iNaturalist
Israel
32.97109
35.54115
GBIF
Israel
33.03372
35.30589
GBIF
Israel
HaZafon
33.17679
35.63402
GBIF
Israel
Golan
33.18039
35.77118
GBIF
Israel
HaZafon
33.241
35.65568
GBIF
Israel
33.24576
35.64843
GBIF
Israel
33.24844
35.65381
GBIF
Israel
33.24897
35.74609
GBIF
Israel
33.28952
35.75171
GBIF
Israel
33.29223
35.75173
GBIF
Israel
Golan
33.29272
35.75448
GBIF
Israel
33.29328
35.75557
iNaturalist
Israel
Hermon
33.29599
35.76239
This study
Israel
33.30293
35.77864
GBIF
Israel
33.30927
35.77116
GBIF
Jordan
Dilāghah
30.13333
35.4
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Ma‘an
30.2
35.73333
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Ayl
30.21667
35.53333
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Petra
30.3333
35.4333
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Ash Shawbak
30.52
35.53833
Amr & Disi (2011)
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 9
Country
Locality
Latitude
Longitude
Source
Jordan
Ash Shawbak
30.5333
35.5667
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Aṭ Ṭafīla
30.83333
35.6
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Al Mazār
30.97722
35.85889
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Al Karak
31.1667
35.75
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Al Karak
31.18472
35.70472
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Rākīn
31.22389
35.70667
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Batīr
31.26417
35.70472
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
‘Ammān
31.96667
35.98333
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Al Jubayhah
32.01667
35.86667
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Şuwayliḩ
32.025
35.83806
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Yājūz
32.03333
35.91667
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Salīhī
32.12278
35.83111
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Dayr ‘Allā
32.19778
35.62111
Amr & Disi (2011)
Jordan
Ibbin
32.36667
35.81667
Disi et al. (2001)
Jordan
Dayr Abu Sa’id
32.5
35.68333
Disi et al. (2001)
Syria
E of Utaibeh, Lake shore
33.50606
36.6274
This study
Syria
2 km N of Seydnaya
33.7173
36.3717
This study
Turkey
Bozyazı-Anamur/Mersin
36.09666
33.04152
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Yılan adası, Kalkan - Antalya
36.21502
29.35472
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Yilan Adasi, Kalkan
36.21517
29.35585
Schatti et al. (2001)
Turkey
Erdemli/Mersin
36.63865
34.34009
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Kaldırım Village-Yumurtalık/Adana
36.67375
35.52499
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Waldgebiet bei Aydolun
36.752
31.774
Kucharzewski (2016)
Turkey
Küplüce Village-Kilis
36.75719
37.23555
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
İztuzu Kuzeyi - Dalyan - Muğla
36.78493
28.62834
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Kızılburun Mevkii - Köyceğiz - Muğla
36.80226
28.52348
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Çandır-Köyceğiz
36.82751
28.60819
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Ekincik- Köyceğiz
36.83261
28.55059
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Toroslar, Mersin
36.83932
34.61363
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Ceyhan (Botaş)/Adana
36.89531
35.91594
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Kavak arası Köyceğiz
36.89906
28.72029
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Toparlar Kuzeyi - Köyceğiz - Muğla
36.98732
28.6671
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Gökova - Muğla
37.05563
28.36512
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Beşkonak - Antalya
37.1403
31.19879
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Ömerli Village-Pozantı/Adana
37.53545
34.87516
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Karina und Umgebung
37.632
27.11756
GBIF
Turkey
Işıklı Village/Aydın
37.832
27.7987
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Suna Plateau-Yahyalı/Kayseri
37.99278
35.39736
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Obruk şelalesi - Saimbeyli - Adana
38.001
36.09318
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Gürümze Village-Feke/Adana
38.04202
35.81172
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Temürağa Village-Göksun/Kahramanmaraş
38.0458
36.58581
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
10 km North of Saimbeyli/Adana
38.06065
36.14885
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Gümüldür, İzmir
38.0775
27.01762
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Bozdağ-Ödemiş/İzmir
38.36708
28.10343
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Turkey
Menemen, İzmir
38.60313
27.07201
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Tahtakuşlar - Kaşdağ
39.59337
26.85549
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Yeniköy - Tekirdağ
40.64698
26.99938
Dokuz Eylül University
Turkey
Orhaniye village, Kocaeli
40.85767
30.0669
Afsar et al. (2013)
West Bank
31.62698
35.12515
GBIF
West Bank
31.78608
35.3019
GBIF
Phylogeography of the collared dwarf racer
Supplementary Materials – 10
References for Supplementary Figures and Table S1.
Afsar, M., Cicek, K., Dincaslan, Y. E., Ayaz, D., & Tok, C. V. (2013). New record localities
of five snake species in Turkey. Herpetozoa, 25, 179–183.
Amr, Z. S., & Disi, A. M. (2011). Systematics, distribution and ecology of the snakes of
Jordan. Vertebrate Zoology, 61, 179–266.
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N.D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, N.,
Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., Noss, R., Hansen, M., Locke, H., Ellis, E.C., Jones, B.,
Barber, C.V., Hayes, R., Kormos, C., Martin, V., Crist, E., Sechrest, W., Price, L.,
Baillie, J.E.M., Weeden, D., Suckling, K., Davis, C., Sizer, N., Moore, R., Thau, D.,
Birch, T., Potapov, P., Turubanova, S., Tyukavina, A., de Souza, N., Pintea, L., Brito,
J.C., Llewellyn, O.A., Miller, A.G., Patzelt, A., Ghazanfar, S.A., Timberlake, J.,
Klöser, H., Shennan-Farpón, Y., Kindt, R., Lillesø, J.-P.B., van Breugel, P., Graudal,
L., Voge, M., Al-Shammari, K.F., Saleem, M., 2017. An ecoregion-based approach to
protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545.
Disi, A. M., Modrý, D., Necas, P., & Rifai, L. (2001). Amphibians and reptiles of the
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Frankfurt am Main: Edition Chimaira.
Kucharzewski, Ch. (2016). Weiterer Beitrag zur Herpetologie der Südwest-Türkei. Sauria,
38, 37–56.
Panner, T. (2009). Bemerkungen zur Herpetofauna des Emine-Balkan mit neuem nördlichsten
Verbreitungsnachweis für Platyceps collaris in Bulgarien. Elaphe, 17, 48–49.
Rehák, I. (1985). Coluber rubriceps thracius ssp. n. from Bulgaria (Reptilia: Squamata:
Colubridae). Věstník Československé společnosti zoologické, 49, 276–282.
Schätti, B., Baran, I., & Maunoir, P. (2001). Taxonomie, Morphologie und Verbreitung der
Masken-Schlanknatter Coluber (s. l.) collaris (Müller, 1878). Revue Suisse de
Zoologie, 108, 11–30.