ArticlePDF Available

Rhizobacteria Communities of Phytoremediation Plant Species in Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil of the Sudd Ecosystem, South Sudan


Abstract and Figures

The Sudd wetland is one of the oil-rich regions of South Sudan where environmental pollution resulting from oil extraction activities has been unprecedented. Although phytoremediation is the most feasible technique, its efficacy reduces at high TPH concentration in soil. This has made rhizoremediation the most preferred approach. Rhizoremediation involves use of a combination of phytoremediation and biostimulation. The process is catalyzed by the action of rhizobacteria. Therefore, the objective of this study is to characterize rhizobacteria communities prevalent in phytoremediation species growing in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils biostimulated with cattle manure. The treatments studied were plant species only (T1), plant species and hydrocarbons (T2), plant species and manure (T3), and plant species, manure, and hydrocarbons (T4). The rhizobacteria communities were determined using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA. In the treatment with phytoremediation species, hydrocarbons 75 g · kg−1soil, and cattle manure 5 g · kg−1soil (T4), there was a significant increase (p
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Research Article
Rhizobacteria Communities of Phytoremediation Plant Species in
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil of the Sudd
Ecosystem, South Sudan
J. A. Ruley ,
J. B. Tumuhairwe,
A. Amoding,
O. T. Westengen,
and H. Vinje
Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
Department of Agricultural Sciences,CNRES, University of Juba, P.O. Box 82, Juba, Sudan
Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU),
As, Norway
Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), ˚
As, Norway
Correspondence should be addressed to J. A. Ruley;
Received 23 October 2020; Accepted 10 December 2020; Published 24 December 2020
Academic Editor: Zhun Li
Copyright ©2020 J. A. Ruley et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
e Sudd wetland is one of the oil-rich regions of South Sudan where environmental pollution resulting from oil extraction
activities has been unprecedented. Although phytoremediation is the most feasible technique, its efficacy reduces at high TPH
concentration in soil. is has made rhizoremediation the most preferred approach. Rhizoremediation involves use of a
combination of phytoremediation and biostimulation. e process is catalyzed by the action of rhizobacteria. erefore, the
objective of this study is to characterize rhizobacteria communities prevalent in phytoremediation species growing in hydro-
carbon-contaminated soils biostimulated with cattle manure. e treatments studied were plant species only (T1), plant species
and hydrocarbons (T2), plant species and manure (T3), and plant species, manure, and hydrocarbons (T4). e rhizobacteria
communities were determined using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA. In the treatment with phytoremediation species, hydro-
carbons 75 g ·kg
soil, and cattle manure 5 g ·kg
soil (T4), there was a significant increase (p<0.05) in rhizobacteria abundance
with the highest ASV observed in H. rufa (4980) and the lowest in S. arundinaceum (3955). In the same treatment, bacteria
community diversity was high in H. rufa (Chao1, 10310) and the least in S. arundinaceum (Chao 1, 8260) with Proteobacteria,
Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria as the dominant phyla. Similarly, in contaminated soil treated with cattle manure, there was a
significant increase (p<0.05) in abundance of rhizobacteria genera with Pseudomonas dominating across phytoremediation
species. H. rufa was dominated by Bacillus, Fusibacter, and Rhodococcus;G. barbadense was mainly associated with Luteimonas
and Mycobacterium, and T. diversifolia was inhabited by Bacillus and Luteimonas. e rhizosphere of O. longistaminata was
dominated by Bacillus, Fusibacter, and Luteimonas, while S. arundinaceum was largely inhabited by Sphingomonas. ese
rhizobacteria genera ought to be applied in the Sudd region for bioremediation.
1. Introduction
Globally, crude oil is a critical resource for national de-
velopment. e world greatly depends on oil and, as a
result, vast amount is used, transported, and stored [1].
Crude oil is number one source of energy and a primary
raw material for major industries worldwide [2].Oil re-
mains an indispensable input for sectors such as
manufacturing (as a raw material and fuel), transport
(fuel), and trade (as an export commodity), and there has
been a steady increase in global demand for crude oil over
the last decades [2, 3, 4]. Over the next two decades, Rada
and colleagues [5] anticipate that world oil demand could
even rise to 170 million barrels per day. is belief has
compelled producing countries to devise ways and means
of increasing production, transportation, and refining of
crude oil in order to meet the purported growth in de-
mand [2, 4], South Sudan inclusive [6].
International Journal of Microbiology
Volume 2020, Article ID 6639118, 13 pages
South Sudan is one of the famous crude oil producing
countries falling 3
after Nigeria and Angola in Africa [6]
and 83
among the 171 oil producing countries worldwide
[7]. Oil is the lifeline of its economy for now and over the
medium term [6]. For example, between 2008 and 2011, oil
exports accounted for 98% of government revenue [6]. is
position has fundamentally changed her economy from
agriculture to industrialization. South Sudan has a pro-
duction capacity of 298,000/390,000 barrels per day [8, 9]
including Sudd wetland. Sudd is the largest wetland in the
whole world and covers 57,000 Km
that makes up ap-
proximately 5% of the total land area of the Republic of
South Sudan (648,000 Km
) [10, 11]. e area of the wetland
is larger than countries such as Switzerland, Belgium, the
Netherlands, and Singapore [12]. Owing to this enormous
size, the Sudd ecosystems are of vast socioeconomic, cul-
tural, and biological importance locally, nationally, and
internationally. is accounts for why it was designated as a
Ramsar site in 2006 [10] making it an essential nature
conservation area.
In all crude oil producing countries around the world,
during the process of crude oil production and secondary
activities such as transportation and storage, several solids,
liquids, and gaseous forms of wastes and pollutants are
generated [13]. Also, spills and discharges of petroleum
hydrocarbons (PHC) in some environments have reportedly
been caused by initial activities such as oil field development,
transportation activities such as leakages from oil pipelines
and haulage tankers, oil well waxing, and at times when
refining and petrochemical equipment is being overhauled
[14–16] contributing to gross contamination of ecosystems.
Soil contamination with PHC is a widespread problem
and has hazardous implications on both environment and
human health [17, 18]. As earlier stated, Sudd wetland is an
oil rich zone. As a result, the Sudd ecosystems are fragile and
therefore threatened by oil exploration and extraction ac-
tivities since the 1980s [19–21] with notable effects on the
environment and natives of the area. e commonly re-
ported effects by studies [20–22] include high salt content in
water, death of livestock, reduction in vegetation cover, and
outbreak of strange diseases hitherto uncommon among
people in the local communities.
Attempts to remediate hydrocarbon-contaminated soil
are a priority in national development plans of many oil-
producing countries in order to counteract the harmful
effects of PHC [23, 24]. South Sudan is not exceptional. e
techniques deployed in remediation of PHC polluted soil are
fivefold: chemical, physical, electrical, thermal, and bio-
logical [25, 26]. e use of chemical treatment involves
chemical precipitation, membrane separation, ion exchange,
carbon absorption, aqueous chemical oxidation, and sur-
factant enhanced recovery [25]. With regard to physical
treatment, the main treatment measures involve land filling,
pumping and treating, dual phase extraction as well as air
sparging, and dual phase extraction [25, 26]. For electrical
remediation, electrical principles are applied to decontam-
inate particular sites though only limited to granular type of
soil contaminated with heavy metals [25]. e thermal
methods are largely used in environments where the
contaminants are highly volatile and include in situ vitri-
fication, incineration, and electrical pyrolysis. However, the
above-mentioned techniques are not largely used at present
because they are associated with various shortcomings such
as high cost, handling of the generated excess waste, and
secondary contamination [25, 26]. is has given way to
biological remediation techniques. It is not by surprise
therefore that in recent times, in most crude oil producing
countries, biological remediation techniques are dominating
any efforts for ecorestoration of PHC contaminated soils
[27], bioremediation inclusive [25].
Bioremediation-based rhizoremediation is a biological
technology with great potential of restoring PHC contam-
inated soils [28, 29]. Rhizoremediation refers to a process in
which the PHC contaminants are degraded by bacteria in the
rhizosphere [23, 24] and uses a suite of indigenous mi-
croorganisms [30]. is approach is nondestructive and is
environmentally acceptable [28, 29, 31] making it a desirable
and sustainable technique [31]. For example, it does not
generate toxic metabolites [29]. Relatedly, Shukla and col-
leagues [32] contend that the mechanism provides a natural
corrective solution in which the synergy between roots of
phytoremediation species and resident plant growth pro-
moting rhizobacteria (PGPR) boosts secretion of root ex-
udates, production of siderophores, phytohormones, and
phosphatases. is accounts for why the approach is
regarded an effective natural remedy for ecorestoration of
polluted sites [32] leading to its popularity as a green
technology as reported elsewhere [33–35].
Compared to other soil inhabiting microorganisms,
bacteria are the most dominant and, therefore, primary
microbial communities that play a fundamental role in
biodegradation of PHC contaminants. e various genera
utilize hydrocarbons as carbon and energy sources [36]. e
degradation potential of bacteria is harnessed with bio-
stimulation using manure. For example, cattle manure
improves soil physicochemical characteristics, hence en-
abling adaptability of bacteria in contaminated soil [37].
Additionally, some manure compounds (such as nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium) are high-energy electron ac-
ceptors and sources of nutrients for bacteria. Although the
degradation potential of different bacteria varies [38],
studies [39, 40] have reported Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas,
Gordonia, Rhodococcus, Immundisolibacter, Luteimonas,
Alcanivorax, Marinobacter, Mycobacterium, Corynebacte-
rium, Bacillus, Ochrobactrum, Sphingomonas, and Hahella
as the most active hydrocarbon degrading genera in rhi-
zosphere. However, the abundance of these genera in the
rhizosphere of contaminated soils in the Sudd ecosystems is
unknown yet; it is essential for harnessing bioremediation.
Furthermore, Mackova and colleagues [41] have shown that
inoculation has limited efficiency to biodegrade hydrocar-
bons due to incompatibility between bacteria and plant
species. e deployment of efficient PHC biodegrading
bacteria in contaminated soils needs to be coupled with the
use of phytoremediation species that enhance their survival
and growth [42, 43]. us, detailed characterization of
rhizosphere bacteria is necessary to facilitate selection and
use of efficient PHC biodegrading species of bacteria for
2International Journal of Microbiology
inoculation during phytoremediation [44]. erefore, the
objective of this study was to determine the rhizobacteria
communities influenced by phytoremediation species
growing in cattle manure biostimulated crude oil contam-
ination soils in the Sudd region using sequences of 16S
ribosomal RNA.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design. A screen house pot experiment
was conducted at Makerere University Agricultural Re-
search Institute, Kabanyolo (MUARIK), from January
2018 to April 2018 (120 days). e soil used in the ex-
periment was collected from nonhydrocarbon contami-
nated natural undisturbed land in the Sudd region as
composite topsoil samples at a depth of 030 cm.
Treatments included two rates of partially decomposed
(1.7: 0.6 : 0.8 NPK) cattle manure, two rates of crude oil,
and five phytoremediation plant species arranged in
Completely Randomised Design (CRD). Cattle manure
was applied at rates of 0 and 5 g·kg
soil confirmed as
economically appropriate [45], while crude oil rates 0 and
75 g ·kg
soil were used. e phytoremediation plant
species were (i) wild cotton (Gossypium barbadense), (ii)
Sudan grass (Sorghum arundinaceum), (iii) wild rice
(Oryza longistaminata), (iv) false sunflower (Tithonia
diversifolia), and (v) thatching grass (Hyparrhenia rufa).
ese plant species are abundant in the Sudd region [46]
and were screened and confirmed as suitable for phy-
toremediation [47].
In this study, polypropylene plastic-made pots were
used. e soil was apportioned into 5 kg pots. To ensure
that soil, cattle manure, and crude oil are mixed thor-
oughly, a metallic sheet was used as a mixing base. e
mixture was returned into the pots with perforated bases
to allow aeration. Each pot was labeled with the name of
the respective treatment. e labeled pots were left for
one week before planting. To cater for any PHC losses,
pots were placed on their lids. Any water leachate was
used to irrigate the respective pot. e lids were also
washed after every two days and the wash water used to
irrigate respective pots.
At 120 days after planting, roots were removed from the
pots. e firmly attached soil to the roots was collected from
all pots (60 treatments) and transported in an ice cooler to
the Biotechnology Laboratory of Makerere University Re-
gional Centre for Crop Improvement at Kabanyolo, Wakiso
district, Uganda, and stored at 80
C until extraction of
genomic DNA.
2.2. Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Communities.
Genomic DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of the rhizosphere
soil sample using DNeasy Power Soil®DNA Isolation Kit
(Qiagen Company) following the manufacturer’s instruc-
tions. Bacterial diversity was analysed using culture inde-
pendent molecular technique16S rRNA gene PCR. e
primers used in PCR reactions were 341F and 785R. A GC
clamp was added to forward primer (F). ese targeted
approximately 300 bp of hypervariable V3 region. All PCR
amplifications were performed using ermoHybaid PCR
cycler (Molecular Biology Instrumentation, Massachusetts,
USA). PCR mixtures were prepared with 5 μl of Taq buffer
10×, 2.5 mM of MgCl
, 200 μmol of each deoxynucleoside
triphosphate (dNTP), 20 pmol each primer, 5 μg of bovine
serum albumin, 1% of formamide and 2.5U Taq polymerase
(Roche Molecular Biochemical, Mannheim, Germany), and
sterile filtered Milli-Q water to a final volume of 50 μl. e
PCR program was as follows: denaturing step of 94°C for
3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, annealing for
1 min at 55°C, and elongation for 1 min at 72°C, followed by a
final elongation at 72°C for 10 min.
e concentrations used for PCR were as follows: total
mixture, 25 µl; dNTPs, 50 µM; genomic DNA, 30 ng/µl; and
each primer, 10 pmol/µl. e concentration of MgCl
in the
reaction mixture was maintained at 1.5 mM for effective
amplification. MgCl
was a cofactor for Taq enzyme and
helped in adding correct dNTPs complementary to the
sequence in newly synthesizing strand by binding to dNTPs.
A second PCR reaction was performed using 5 ml of the first
PCR products as template under the same primers (GC
clamp attached to the primer U968f ) and conditions
specified for the first PCR reaction. e PCR reactions were
performed in duplicate, in order to obtain adequate DNA
amount for electrophoresis. Amplification products were
checked in 1.3% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide
(0.1 mg/ml). is was followed by storage at 20°C and then
sending to the LGC Genomics Sequencing Centre in Ger-
many. Purified PCR products were pyrosequenced using
Illumina MiSeq by the LGC Genomics Sequencing Centre in
Germany (
2.3. Data Preprocessing. After sequencing, demultiplexing of
all libraries for each sequencing lane was done using Illu-
mina bcl2fastq software (folder RAW). One to two
mismatches were allowed in the barcode and read when the
barcode distances between all libraries on the lane allowed
for it. e sorting of reads by amplicon inline barcodes
(folder RAW) was done through one mismatch that was
allowed per barcode. e barcode sequence was then clipped
from the sequence after sorting and reads with missing
barcodes, one-sided barcodes, or conflicting barcode pairs
were discarded.
Clipping of sequencing adapter remnants from all reads
(folder AdapterClipped) was carried out and reads with final
length <100 bases were discarded. e primer detection and
clipping (folder Primer Clipped) was done by allowing three
mismatches per primer; pairs of primers (Fw-Rev or Rev-
Fw) were present in the sequence fragments. Whenever
primer-dimers were detected, the outer primer copies were
clipped from the sequence. e sequence fragments were
turned into forward-reverse primer orientation after re-
moving primer sequences.
2.4. Bioinformatics Processing. After primer removal and
clipping of sequences, read sequences were loaded into R
(version 3.6) and run through DADA2 pipeline (version
International Journal of Microbiology 3
1.12) [48]. e sequences were filtered and trimmed using
filterAndTrim” function. e trimming specifications were
as follows. First, truncation length (truncLen) was set to 250
bases for both forward and reverse reads. Secondly, cutoff for
maximum expected error calculated from the quality score
(maxEE) was set to 3 for both forward and reverse reads for
quality plots. e remaining parameters were held as default.
e error rate was estimated by function “learnError.”
irdly, a dereplication process was conducted with func-
tion “derepFastq.” All identical sequencing reads were
combined into one unique sequence with a corresponding
abundance equal to number of reads with that unique
Before merging, core sample inference algorithm was
applied to data [49]. e forward and reverse reads were
then merged together to obtain full denoised sequences with
function “mergePairs.” As defaults in DADA2, merged se-
quences were only output if forward and reverse reads
overlapped with a minimum of 12 bases. e merged se-
quences were then rearranged in an Amplicon Sequence
Variant (ASV) table [50] and cleaned for chimeras with
functions “makeSequenceTable” and “removeBimer-
aDenovo,” respectively. For taxonomic classification, rec-
ommendations of Callahan and colleagues were used [50],
together with a native implementation of Na¨
ıve Bayesian
classifier method [51] using function “assignTaxonomy” still
in DADA2 package. e ASVs with chimeras were removed
from analysis using “subset_taxa” function in “Phyloseq
package (
2.5. Statistical Analysis. All statistical analyses were per-
formed in R software (V2.15.3). To estimate coverage and
sampling diversity, rarefaction curves were constructed.
Phyloseq” package calculated population diversity (Simp-
son index), evenness (Shannon index), and richness
(Chao1). To test effect of treatments on bacterial community
structures, PERMANOVA analysis using “adonis” function
in “vegan” package was performed. To ensure that PER-
MANOVA results were not affected by in-group dispersions,
an analysis of multivariate homogeneity of group dispersion
was conducted for different treatments using “betadisper
function in “vegan” package (Anderson, 2006). Differences
in bacterial community dispersion between treatments were
assessed using PERMDISP, since a significant PERMA-
NOVA result may indicate either a difference in centroids or
an unequal dispersion between treatments. Multivariate
analysis using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS)
and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to ex-
plore hierarchical structure of bacterial community com-
position under effects of different treatments. ese were
calculated from Bray–Curtis matrices using the “metaMDS
function from “vegan” package.
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Treatment on Bacterial Community Richness.
A total of 5 million high-quality paired-end reads were
generated from Illumina MiSeq platform with an average of
83,333 reads per sample (n60). e tags were obtained
with a maximum of 81,480 filtered sequences clustered to
3927 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) of sixty samples at
3% confidence interval. Rarefaction was conducted to ap-
proximate the number of ASVs in random samples. e
rarefaction curves (Figure 1) asymptotically approached a
plateau, suggesting that the curves accurately reflected mi-
crobial community richness and indicated that the se-
quencing efforts were sufficient for this study.
PERMANOVA analysis showed cattle manure and hy-
drocarbon contamination significantly affected rhizobac-
teria community but not plant species (Table 1). e
interaction of plant species and cattle manure explained
5.1% of ASVs variation in community structure. Similarly,
interaction of plant species and hydrocarbon accounted for
9.2% of variation in ASVs. Biostimulation of plant species
for bioremediation of TPH contaminated soil with cattle
manure explained 13.4 % variation in assemblages of bac-
terial communities (Table 1).
3.2. Taxonomic Bacterial Community Composition. e se-
quences were classified into 33 phyla, 54 classes, 128 orders,
268 families, and 511 genera of bacteria at 80% bootstrap.
Treatments containing plant species and manure (T3) had
the highest number of phyla and genera. is was followed
by treatments containing plant species, manure, and hy-
drocarbon (T4), while plant species and hydrocarbon (T2)
had the least number of phyla and genera. e most and least
abundant rhizobacteria communities were noted in treat-
ments with plant species, manure and hydrocarbon (T4) and
plant species and hydrocarbon (T2), respectively. Similarly,
most and least diversities were observed in T4 (H. rufa and
T. diversifolia) and T2 (S. arundinaceum), respectively
(Table 2).
3.3. Bacterial Community Abundance and Diversity. e
richness and diversity of bacterial communities significantly
differed (p<0.000) between plant species in all tested pa-
rameters except Simpson’s index (Table 2). In all the five-
plant species, there was high abundance of bacterial com-
munities in the treatment with plant only (T1). However,
when TPH was added to plant species (T2), there was a
significant (p<0.05) decline in abundance as shown by a
drop in Chao 1 values across the five phytoremediation
species. Addition of cattle manure (T4) to the treatment
(plant + TPH) significantly increased (p<0.05) bacterial
abundance. In S. arundinaceum, the communities quadru-
pled (from 2097 to 8260); in G. barbadense, there was
multiple increase (from 2781 to 9540) and a near multiple
increase in O. longistaminata (from 3597 to 9168) and
H. rufa (from 4304 to 10,310), while in T. diversifolia, the
communities doubled (from 4223 to 9795).
e sudden rise in abundance of bacteria communities
in the treatment with plant species, hydrocarbon, and
manure (T4) was attributed to addition of cattle manure.
Largely, manure improves soil physicochemical properties
leading to improved conditions for plant and microbial
growth. erefore, the rhizosphere became a hotspot for
4International Journal of Microbiology
survival of different bacteria communities thereby ac-
counting for the increased abundance. Moreover, cattle
manure contains bacteria strains, which could have en-
hanced biodegradation of the TPH. In all phytoremediation
plant species, there were significant differences (p<0.05) in
diversity in the Shannon index. However, the diversity in the
Simpson index was not significant (p<0.05) across all
treatments. e most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria
across all plant species with or without manure and the TPH
accounting for about 41.6% of all ASVs, followed by Acti-
nobacteria (12.7%) and Firmicutes (9.8%), of all ASVs
(Figure 2).
Species richness
010000 15000 20000 2000010000 1500050000
2000010000 1500050000
Sequence sample size
Gossypium barbadense Tithonia diversifolia Oryza longistaminata
Sorghum arundinaceum Hyparrhenia rufa
T1 T4
T1 T1
T2 T2
Figure 1: Rarefaction curve showing sampling depths across the five plant species with and without compost and petroleum contamination
(T1 plant species only, T2 plant species and hydrocarbon, T3 plant species and Manure, and T4 plant species, manure, and
Table 1: PERMANOVA analysis of interaction effects of plant species, organic manure, and hydrocarbons on bacterial community based on
Bray–Curtis dissimilarity.
Factor Df SS MS F. Model R
Pr (>F)
Plant species 4 0.5899 0.5987 3.9978 0.02941 0.081
Plant species: manure 1 0.9233 0.32611 3.0066 0.05130 0.009
Plant species: hydrocarbon 1 0.6157 0.18444 1.5462 0.09255 0.001
Interaction 4 0.9845 0.3217 2.2381 0.13421 0.002
Residuals 95 13.1882 0.13977 0.80211
Total 105 15.3171 1
Df degrees of freedom; SS sum of squares; MS mean squares; F. Model F-test value for model; R
R-squared; Pr (>F) pvalue.
International Journal of Microbiology 5
Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria domi-
nated TPH contaminated soils across all plant species
(Figure 2). For example, G. barbadense was mainly associ-
ated with Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. e rhizo-
spheres of T. diversifolia and O. longistaminata were
inhabited by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Similarly, the
rhizosphere of S. arundinaceum was dominated by only
Proteobacteria, while the roots of H. rufa had a high
abundance of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and
3.4. Rhizobacteria Genera. e dominant genera across all
phytoremediation species were Pseudomonas (Figure 3).
However, it was more dominant in H. rufa. Generally,
besides Pseudomonas, other genera observed in all phy-
toremediation species were Luteimonas, Sphingomonas,
Mycobacterium, Bacillus, and Fusibacter. ese were
relatively more abundant in manure treated hydrocar-
bon-contaminated soil (T4) (Figure 3). Compared to the
rest, H. rufa had more Bacillus,Fusibacter, and Rhodo-
coccus. Plant species G. barbadense was mainly associated
with bacteria genera Luteimonas and Mycobacterium,
while T. diversifolia was inhabited by Bacillus and
Luteimonas. e rhizosphere of O. longistaminata was
dominated by Bacillus, Fusibacter, and Luteimonas, while
S. arundinaceum was largely inhabited by Sphingomonas.
ere was an increase in bacterial diversity in manure
treated hydrocarbon contaminated soil due to addition of
cattle manure (Figure 3).
3.5. Environmental Influence on Composition of Bacterial
Communities. Bray–Curtis distance nonmetric multidi-
mensional scaling (NMDS) revealed differences in com-
position of bacterial communities between hydrocarbon and
nonhydrocarbon treatments. In two hydrocarbon-contam-
inated treatments, one was with plant species and hydro-
carbon (T2) and the other with plant species, hydrocarbon,
and manure (T4), where bacterial communities clustered in
groups (see the ring in Figure 4). is was different from
nonhydrocarbon treatments: one with plant species only
(T1) and the other with plant species and manure (T3) where
bacterial communities were scattered (Figure 4).
Results from principal component analysis (PCA) also
revealed separate clustering of bacterial communities be-
tween hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon-containing
treatments. Irrespective of phytoremediation plant species,
bacterial communities in the treatment containing plant
species and hydrocarbon (T2) and one containing plant
species, hydrocarbon, and manure (T4) clustered separately
from one with plant species only (T1) as well as one with
plant species and manure (T3) (Figure 5). However, the
pattern of clustering was influenced by specific phytor-
emediation species, a factor explained by differences in
percentage variances for PC1 and PC2 (Figure 5).
4. Discussion
ere were significant variations (p<0.000) between
rhizobacterial communities of phytoremediation species
with and without hydrocarbon contamination. In the
Table 2: Rhizobacteria community abundance and diversity in phytoremediation plant species biostimulated with cattle manure in
hydrocarbon contaminated soils.
Treatments Parameters
Plant species Compost (t/ha) TPH (mg
kg-1 soil) ASVs Number of
Number of
chao 1
002625 40 44 5600 4.93 0.87
75 1215 24 27 2781 4. 11 0.97
206935 101 81 14226 5.97 0.76
75 4595 68. 54 9540 5.09 0.84
003144 34 57 6638 5.14 0.82
75 1936 21 34 4223 4.30 0.94
207770 85 99 15891 6.25 0.73
75 4723 60 63 9795 5.24 0.81
002764 49 66 5878 5.09 0.83
75 1623 30 43 3597 4.16 0.96
206289 99 80 12944 6.14 0.74
75 4408 82 58 9168 5.16 0.82
002198 37 37 4745 4.86 0.88
75 871 23 23 2097 3.98 0.98
205371 69 65 11095 5.87 0.78
75 3955 56 43 8260 4.84 0.89
Hyparrhenia. rufa
003583 79 86 7518 5.37 0.8
75 1979 40 47 4304 4.54 0.92
209675 172 164 19701 6.55 2.89
75 4980 140 136 10310 5.64 0.75
LSD (0.05) (plant TPH compost) 181.1∗∗∗ 5.2∗∗ 2.1∗∗∗ 365∗∗∗ 0.06ns
∗∗∗0.000, ∗∗0.001, and 0.05.
6International Journal of Microbiology
treatments with plant species alone (T1), high bacterial
diversity was noted. However, when hydrocarbons were
introduced (T2), there was a great reduction in diversity.
e bacterial community shifts and eventual decrease in
richness resulted from perturbations that normally occur
in hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Past studies [52, 53]
have proved that introduction of PHC in soil reduces
bacterial diversity considerably regardless of the soil
matrix type. Nevertheless, in this study, certain bacterial
strains resilient to toxicity of PHC existed. ese must
have used TPH as a source of energy, carbon, or electron
receptors for growth. As reported earlier, across all plant
species, bacteria genera Luteimonas, Pseudomonas, and
Sphingomonas (phylum Proteobacteria), Mycobacteria
and Rhodococcus (phylum Actinobacteria) and genera
Bacillus and Fusibacter (phylum Firmicutes) were
abundant in the treatment with plant and hydrocarbon
(T2) and one with plant species, hydrocarbon, and cattle
manure (T4).
Similarly, bacterial communities in hydrocarbon-con-
taminated soil were significantly affected by biostimulation
with cattle manure (T4). e inclusion of cattle manure
posted both direct and indirect benefits for the survival of
bacterial communities. Directly, cattle manure amendments
improved soil physicochemical characteristics enabling
speedy adaptation by microorganisms. Furthermore, the
introduction of cattle manure must have increased on soil
fertility by adding soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen
(TN), and NPK. is must have improved plant resilience
and performance in the PHC contaminated soil. Accumu-
lation of soil organic carbon for example not only results in
increased microbial biomass but also affects microbial
community structure and functional diversity [54]. ere-
fore, cattle manure indirectly influenced a spectacular in-
crease in the microbial diversity observed. Cattle manure
additions also improved soil pH and physical properties
(aggregation and porosity), thus creating favorable growth
conditions for microbes. Earlier studies [55–57] have shown
Gossypium barbadense
Sorghum arundinaceum Hyparrhenia rufa
Tithonia diversifolia H. Oryza longistaminata
T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4
T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4
T1 T2 T3 T4
Figure 2: Composition and distribution of bacterial phyla with 3% relative abundance across five plant spp. with and without compost and
petroleum contamination (T1 plant species only, T2 plant species and hydrocarbon, T3 plant species and manure, and T4 plant
species, manure, and hydrocarbon).
International Journal of Microbiology 7
that addition of organic manure to hydrocarbon-contami-
nated soil enhances multiplication of bacteria population.
Furthermore, addition of cattle manure improves soil fer-
tility, which is vital for sustained plant growth [56].
In the rhizosphere, the bacterial colonize the root
surfaces, compete against other microbes and form
synergestic interactions with host plants [58]. Phyla
Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes domi-
nated the treatment with hydrocarbon contaminated soil
and plant species (T2) and treatment T4 with plant
species and manure treated hydrocarbon contaminated
soil (T4). ese phyla contain members of organotrophic
microorganisms that utilize a wide range of organic
substrates perhaps including hydrocarbon. Although
bacterial strains survive best in aerobic conditions, the
three phyla also thrive well in anaerobic environments.
eir survival in anaerobic conditions is guaranteed by
secretion of intracellular and extracellular enzymes which
help in biodegradation of recalcitrant and organo-
pollutants. ese bacteria have enzymes capable of
assimilating, degrading, and utilizing different hydro-
carbon constituents as sources of carbon and energy
[29, 58].
Assimilation is a complex biological oxidation process
enhanced by supplementation with fixed nitrogen, phos-
phate, and other nutrients [58]. For example, one of the
enzymes, oxidoreductases, enables oxidative coupling to
take place enabling both phyla to extract energy via energy-
yielding biochemical reactions which cleaves chemical
bonds, assisting transfer of electrons from a reduced organic
substrate (donor) to another chemical compound (accep-
tor). In this process, contaminants are finally oxidized to
harmless compounds. is guarantees survival of the bac-
teria communities in a less toxic environment. Furthermore,
oxidoreductases catalyze humification of various phenolic
substances in soil environment through polymerization and
copolymerization with other substrates [59].
e three phyla are also known for secreting oxygenases.
In the test samples, oxygenases both monooxygenases and
dioxygenases could have been secreted by the phyla.
Gossypium barbadense
Sorghum arundinaceum Hyparrhenia rufa
Tithonia diversifolia
Oryza longistaminata
T1 T4
T1 T4
Figure 3: Variation in bacterial genera within rhizosphere of five phytoremediation species under four different treatments (T1 plant
species only, T2 plant species and hydrocarbon, T3 plant species and manure, and T4 plant species, manure, and hydrocarbon).
8International Journal of Microbiology
Monooxygenases catalyze desulfurization, dehalogenation,
denitrification, ammonification, hydroxylation, biotrans-
formation, and biodegradation of various aromatic and
aliphatic compounds, while dioxygenases introduce mo-
lecular oxygen into their substrate [60]. erefore, both
processes must have aided transformation of aromatic
precursors into aliphatic products that are less toxic, creating
better living environmental conditions. Furthermore, Pro-
tobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes are known for
secreting lacasses [61] that serves as a catalyst for the rapid
oxidation of phenolic and aromatic substrates. Besides,
lacasses also enhance reduction of molecular oxygen to
water [62, 63]. Equally, lacasses decarboxylate phenolic and
methoxy-phenolic acids into nutritious compounds for
bacteria [64].
Results from NMDS and PCA showed clustering of
bacteria in hydrocarbon contaminated soil with plant species
(T2) and one biostimulated by manure (T4), while in
nonhydrocarbon contaminated soil with plant species only
(T1) and one with plant species and manure (T3), the
communities of bacteria were scattered from each other. e
clustering could be associated with catabolic potential of
dominant bacteria phyla established by this study. Although
Sutton [53] reasoned that regardless of soil matrix type, clean
samples (nonhydrocarbon contaminated) have higher di-
versity than contaminated soil, results of this study showed
more diversity and clustering in hydrocarbon contaminated
treatments compared to those without. e clustering must
have occurred due to the ability of the treatments with TPH
to selectively stimulate bacterial propagation especially
through addition of carbon (mixture of aliphatic and aro-
matic hydrocarbons) that enriches taxa by serving as growth
substrates [65]. e metabolic capacities of taxa therefore
enabled biotransformation of various organic compounds
by breaking down their bigger molecules into smaller units
either by oxidation to release energy or complete utilization
in other anabolic reactions. e versatility of taxa to use both
saturated aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons played key
role in enhancing survival and, consequently, removal of
heterogeneous toxic contamination. is scenario has been
observed in past studies. For example, Peng and colleagues
[66] concluded that oil-polluted soils support a cornucopia
of bacterial communities due to their richness in organic
Addition of cattle manure to treatments with TPH in-
creased clustering of taxa. Biostimulation with cattle manure
boosted growth performance of the rhizosphere of phy-
toremediation plant species. e associated exudates were
colonized by taxa leading to increased clustering as observed
in treatments with plant species and hydrocarbon (T2) and
plant species, hydrocarbon, and cattle manure (T4) (see
Figure 4). is concurs with Praeg [56] that rhizosphere
zones of plants are hotspots for microbial growth, abun-
dance and diversity due to nutrient availability.
5. Conclusion and Recommendation
Plant species growing in TPH contaminated soil are
inhabited by various strains of rhizobacteria because their
roots provide excellent living conditions. In this study,
–1.0 –0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
Figure 4: Nonmultidimensional scaling (NMDS) showing ASVs between hydrocarbon (T2, T4) and nonhydrocarbon (T1, T3) treatments.
T1 plant species only (G. barbadense, H rufa T diversifolia, O longistaminata. and S. arundinaceum), T2 Plant species and hydrocarbon
(0, 75 g·kg
), T3 Plant species and manure (0, 2 tha
), and T4 Plant species, manure, hydrocarbon.
International Journal of Microbiology 9
rhizobacteria genera Bacillus, Fusibacter, Luteimonas, My-
cobacterium, Pseudomonas Rhodococcus, and Sphingomonas
were abundant in rhizosphere of phytoremediation species.
In the same vein, the study also established that addition of
cattle manure enhanced multiplication of these genera.
erefore, it is concluded that, in order to achieve better
PC1 (48.5% explained var.)
Tithonia diversifolia
PC2 (18.5% explained var)
PC1 (50.0% explained var.)
Oryza longistaminata
–100 0
PC2 (17.1% explained var)
PC1 (48.5% explained var.)
–50 50
Sorghum arundinaceum
PC2 (17.4% explained var)
PC1 (54.7% explained var.)
Hyparrhenia rufa
PC2 (25% explained var)
PC1 (45.1% explained var.)
Gossypium barbadense
–40 40 80–80
PC2 (21.9% explained var.)
Figure 5: Principal component analysis of bacterial communities across different phytoremediation species growing under different
treatments (T1, plant species only; T2, plant species and hydrocarbon; T3, plant species and manure; T4, plant species, manure, and
10 International Journal of Microbiology
bioremediation, TPH contaminated soils should be bio-
stimulated with cattle manure to increase rhizobacteria
richness. With the exception of Mycobacterium (a genus that
includes dangerous pathogens), this study recommends use
of the genera listed above as an inoculum during ecor-
estoration of PHC contaminated soils in Sudd region, South
Sudan. Mycobacterium is a carrier of tuberculosis (TB)
which is a common cause of death with a prevalence rate of
257 per 100,000 people in South Sudan.
Data Availability
Data for the outputs reported in this paper are part of an
ongoing Ph.D. study and can only be availed in consultation
with the corresponding author reachable at janenajeb@
Conflicts of Interest
e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
e authors acknowledge support of the Ministry of pe-
troleum and Gas, Dar Petroleum Company Ltd., Sudanese
Petroleum, and other associated laboratories and colleagues
at University of Juba for valuable comments. e authors
also acknowledge the support of NORHED Project Imple-
menters, Dr. Busulwa Henry and Dr. Bojoi Moses Tomor, of
Makerere University and University of Juba, respectively.
is study was funded by NORAD through the Sudd project
(NORHED Project no. SSD-13/0021) implemented by
University of Juba, Makerere University, and the Norwegian
University of Life Sciences, NMBU.
[1] P. K. Jain, V. K. Gupta, R. K. Gaur, M. Lowry, D. P. Jaroli, and
U. K. Chauhan, “Bioremediation of petroleum oil contami-
nated soil and water,” Research Journal of Environmental
Toxicology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2011.
[2] G. O. Adesina and K. A. Adelasoye, “Effect of crude oil
pollution on heavy metal contents, microbial population in
soil, and maize and cowpea growth,” Agricultural Sciences,
vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2014.
[3] M. Mukhtar and L. D. Griffin, “Bioremediation-a beneficial
use of biotechnology and allied engineering technologies in oil
producing regions,” International Journal of Sustainable
Water and Environmental Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 83–85,
[4] M. Ojewumi, E. Anenih, O. Taiwo, B. Adekeye, O. Awolu, and
E. Ojewumi, “A bioremediation study of raw and treated
crude petroleum oil polluted soil with Aspergillus Niger and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Ecological Engineering,
vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 226–235, 2018.
[5] E. C. Rada, G. Andreottola, I. A. Istrate, P. Viotti, F. Conti, and
E. R. Magaril, “Remediation of soil polluted by organic
compounds through chemical oxidation and phytor-
emediation combined with DCT,” International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 17,
p. 3179, 2019.
[6] J. Cust and T. Harding, “Oil in South Sudan: implications
from international experience,” in International Growth
Centre (IGC), Working Paper47 pages, London School of
Economic and Political Science, London, UK, 2013.
[7] U.S. Energy Information Administration, Production of Crude
Oil Including Lease Condensate 2019, U.S. Energy Information
Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
[8] S. Kuch and J. P. Bavumiragira, “Impacts of crude oil ex-
ploration and production on environment and its implica-
tions on human health: South Sudan Review,” International
Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), vol. 9,
no. 4, p. p8836, 2019.
[9] A. De Waal, “When Kleptocracy becomes insolvent: brute
causes of the civil war in South Sudan,” African Affairs,
vol. 113, no. 452, pp. 347–369, 2014.
[10] Ramsar Convention Secretariat, “e ramsar strategic plan
2009-2015: goals, strategies and expectations for the ramsar
convention’s implementation for the period 2009 to 2015,” in
Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, Ramsar
Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland, 4th edition, 2010.
[11] A. Sosnowski, E. Ghoneim, J. J. Burke, E. Hines, and J. Halls,
“Remote regions, remote data: a spatial investigation of
precipitation, dynamic land covers, and conflict in the Sudd
wetland of South Sudan,” Applied Geography, vol. 69,
pp. 51–64, 2016.
[12] NationMaster (2020). Geography >Land Area >Square
Miles: Countries Compared.
[13] S. Ngene, K. Tota-Maharaj, P. Eke, and C. Hills, “Environ-
mental and economic impacts of crude oil and natural gas
production in developing countries,” International Journal of
Economy, Energy and Environment, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 64–73,
[14] M. Berger and J. Schwarzbauer, “Historical deposition of
riverine contamination on terrestrial floodplains as revealed
by organic indicators from an industrial point source,” Water,
air & Soil Pollution, vol. 227, no. 1, p. 20, 2016.
[15] K. Shapiro, S. Khanna, and S. Ustin, “Vegetation impact and
recovery from oil-induced stress on three ecologically distinct
wetland sites in the gulf of Mexico,” Journal of Marine Science
and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2016.
[16] H. Wang, X. Hu, Z. Ke et al., “Porous metal filters and
membranes for oil–water separation,” Nanoscale Research
Letters, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 284, 2018.
[17] Y. Fan, T. Zhu, M. Li, J. He, and R. Huang, “Heavy metal
contamination in soil and Brown rice and human health risk
assessment near three mining areas in Central China,” Journal
of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 4124302,
9 pages, 2017.
[18] J. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Liu et al., “Ecological risk assessment of
heavy metals in soils surrounding oil waste disposal areas,”
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 188, no. 2,
pp. 1–10, 2016.
[19] A. Mager, L. Wirkus, and E. Schoepfer, “Impact assessment of
oil exploitation in South Sudan using multi-temporal landsat
imagery,” Photogrammetrie—Fernerkundung—Geoinformat
ion, vol. 2016, no. 4, pp. 211–223, 2016.
[20] F. Pragst, K. Stieglitz, H. Runge et al., “High concentrations of
lead and barium in hair of the rural population caused by
water pollution in the ar Jath oilfields in South Sudan,”
Forensic Science International, vol. 274, pp. 99–106, 2017.
[21] H. Rueskamp, J. Ariki, K. Stieglitz, and C. Treskatis, “Effect of
oil exploration and production on the salinity of a marginally
permeable aquifer system in the ar Jath-, Mala- and Unity
International Journal of Microbiology 11
Oilfields, Southern Sudan,” Zentralblatt f¨
ur Geologie und
aontologie, Teil I, vol. 2014, no. 1, pp. 95–115, 2014.
[22] I. Y. Tutdel, Falling between the Cracks? Prospects for Envi-
ronmental Litigation Arising from Oil Production in Southern
Sudan, Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg, South
Africa, 2010.
[23] S. Bisht, P. Pandey, A. Sood, S. Sharma, and N. S. Bisht,
“Biodegradation of naphthalene and anthracene by chemo-
tactically active rhizobacteria of Populus deltoides,” Brazilian
Journal of Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 922–930, 2010.
[24] S. Bisht, P. Pandey, B. Bhargava, S. Sharma, V. Kumar, and
K. D. Sharma, “Bioremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) using rhizosphere technology,” Brazilian Journal of
Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 7–21, 2015.
[25] C. E. Anih, A. Okewale, and N. O. E. Moses, “Effect of nu-
trients on bioremediation of crude oil-polluted water,”
American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering,
vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019.
[26] I. C. Ossai, A. Ahmed, A. Hassan, and F. S. Hamid, “Re-
mediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum
hydrocarbon: a review,” Environmental Technology & Inno-
vation, vol. 17, p. 100526, 2020.
[27] A. F. Shahaby, A. A. Alharthi, and A. E. El Tarras, “Biore-
mediation of petroleum oil by potential biosurfactant-pro-
ducing bacteria using gravimetric assay,” International
Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 4,
no. 5, pp. 390–403, 2015.
[28] C. Guarino, D. Zuzolo, M. Marziano et al., “Investigation and
assessment for an effective approach to the reclamation of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) contaminated site:
SIN bagnoli, Italy,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12,
[29] Y. Li, W. Niu, X. Cao et al., “Effect of soil aeration on root
morphology and photosynthetic characteristics of potted
tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) at different NaCl
salinity levels,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 331, 2019.
[30] M. Veerapagu, K. R. Jeya, R. Kalaivani, K. A. Jeyanthi, and
S. Geethanjali, “Screening of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria
isolated from oil contaminated soil,” e Pharma Innovation
Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 69–72, 2019.
[31] L. U. Obi, H. I. Atagana, and R. A. Adeleke, “Isolation and
characterisation of crude oil sludge degrading bacteria,”
SpringerPlus, vol. 5, p. 1946, 2016.
[32] K. P. Shukla, S. Sharma, N. K. Singh, V. Singh, S. Bisht, and
V. Kumar, “Rhizoremediation: a promising rhizosphere
technology,” Applied Bioremediation Active and Passive Ap-
proaches, pp. 333–352, 2013.
[33] R. J. W. Brooijmans, M. I. Pastink, and R. J. Siezen, “Hy-
drocarbon-degrading bacteria: the oil-spill clean-up crew,”
Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 587–594, 2009.
[34] G. O. Oyetibo, K. Miyauchi, Y. Huang et al., “Biotechnological
remedies for the estuarine environment polluted with heavy
metals and persistent organic pollutants,” International Bio-
deterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 119, pp. 614–625, 2017.
[35] R. C. Prince, “e microbiology of marine oil spill biore-
mediation,” in Petroleum Microbiology, pp. 317–335, Amer-
ican Society for Microbiology (ASM), Washington, DC, USA,
[36] N. Das and P. Chandran, “Microbial degradation of petro-
leum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview,” Biotechnology
Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 941810, 13 pages,
[37] R. M. M. Abed, J. Al-Sabahi, F. Al-Maqrashi, A. Al-Habsi, and
M. Al-Hinai, “Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading
bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated sediments in the
Sultanate of Oman and evaluation of bioaugmentation and
biostimulation approaches in microcosm experiments,” In-
ternational Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 89,
pp. 58–66, 2014.
[38] P. Agamuthu, Y. S. Tan, and S. H. Fauziah, “Bioremediation of
hydrocarbon contaminated soil using selected organic
wastes,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 694–
702, 2013.
[39] S. D. Siciliano, N. Fortin, A. Mihoc et al., “Selection of specific
endophytic bacterial genotypes by plants in response to soil
contamination,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2469–2475, 2001.
[40] M. Hassanshahian, M. S. Zeynalipour, and F. H. Musa,
“Isolation and characterization of crude oil degrading bacteria
from the Persian Gulf (Khorramshahr provenance),” Marine
Pollution Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 2014.
[41] M. Mackova, D. Dowling, and T. Macek, Phytoremediation
and rhizoremediation, Springer Science & Business Media,
Berlin, Germany, 2006.
[42] H.-H. Liste and I. Prutz, “Plant performance, dioxygenase-
expressing rhizosphere bacteria, and biodegradation of
weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soil,” Chemosphere,
vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1411–1420, 2006.
[43] L. Phillips, C. Greer, and J. Germida, “Culture-based and
culture-independent assessment of the impact of mixed and
single plant treatments on rhizosphere microbial communi-
ties in hydrocarbon contaminated flare-pit soil,” Soil Biology
and Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2823–2833, 2006.
[44] L. L. Daane, I. Harjono, G. J. Zylstra, and M. M. Häggblom,
“Isolation and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hy-
drocarbon-degrading bacteria associated with the rhizosphere
of salt marsh plants,” Applied and Environmental Microbi-
ology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2683–2691, 2001.
[45] J. A. Ruley, A. Amoding, J. B. Tumuhairwe, T. A. Basamba,
E. Opolot, and H. Oryem-Origa, “Enhancing the phytor-
emediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in the Sudd
wetlands, South Sudan, using organic manure,” Applied and
Environmental Soil Science, vol. 2020, Article ID 4614286,
8 pages, 2020.
[46] J. A. Ruley, A. Amoding, J. B. Tumuhairwe, T. Basamba, and
H. Oryem-Origa, “Hydrocarbons in crude-oil production
sites of Sudd-region South-Sudan: implication on soil fertility
and plant species risk,” International Journal of Current Re-
search, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 63070–63075, 2017.
[47] J. A. Ruley, J. B. Tumuhairwe, A. Amoding, E. Opolot,
H. Oryem-Origa, and T. Basamba, “Assessment of plants for
phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in the
Sudd Wetland of South Sudan,” Plant, Soil and Environment,
vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 463–469, 2019.
[48] B. J. Callahan, P. J. McMurdie, M. J. Rosen, A. W. Han,
A. J. A. Johnson, and S. P. Holmes, “DADA2: high-resolution
sample inference from Illumina amplicon data,” Nature
Methods, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 581–583, 2016a.
[49] B. J. Callahan, K. Sankaran, J. A. Fukuyama, P. J. McMurdie,
and S. P. Holmes, “Bioconductor workflow for microbiome
data analysis: from raw reads to community analyses,”
F1000Research, vol. 5, p. 1492, 2016b.
[50] B. J. Callahan, “Silva taxonomic training data formatted for
dada2 (silva version 128),” Ph. D thesis, OpenAire Inc,
Oakville, Canada, 2017.
[51] Q. Wang, G. M. Garrity, J. M. Tiedje, and J. R. Cole, “Naïve
bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences
12 International Journal of Microbiology
into the new bacterial taxonomy,” Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 16, pp. 5261–5267, 2007.
[52] C. B. Chikere, G. C. Okpokwasili, and B. O. Chikere, “Bac-
terial diversity in a tropical crude oil-polluted soil undergoing
bioremediation,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8,
no. 11, 2011.
[53] N. B. Sutton, F. Maphosa, J. A. Morillo et al., “Impact of long-
term diesel contamination on soil microbial community
structure,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 79,
no. 2, pp. 619–630, 2013.
[54] Z. Guo, J. Han, J. Li, Y. Xu, and X. Wang, “Effects of long-term
fertilization on soil organic carbon mineralization and mi-
crobial community structure,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 1, Article
ID e0211163, 2019.
[55] F. A. Ikuesan, B. E. Boboye, and F. C. Adetuyi, “Comparative
bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil samples using
activated soil and activated cow dung,” Sky Journal of Mi-
crobiology Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 21–30, 2016.
[56] F. Olubunmi, S. Olatunde, A. Abiodun, and A. Helen,
“Bacterial degradation of contaminated soil using organic
manure,” International Journal of Environment, Agriculture
and Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 5, 2019.
[57] C. Bhattacharyya, U. Bakshi, I. Mallick, S. Mukherji, B. Bera,
and A. Ghosh, “Genome-guided insights into plant growth
promotion capabilities of physiologically versatile Bacillus
aryabhattai strain AB211,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8,
p. 411, 2017.
[58] O. C. Nwinyi, I. A. Kanu, A. Tunde, and K. O. Ajanaku,
“Characterization of diesel degrading bacterial species from
contaminated tropical ecosystem,” Brazilian Archives of Bi-
ology and Technology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 789–796, 2014.
[59] T. Kudanga, S. Burton, G. S. Nyanhongo, and G. M. Guebitz,
“Versatility of oxidoreductases in the remediation of envi-
ronmental pollutants,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. E4, no. 3,
pp. 1127–1149, 2012.
[60] E. W. Van Hellemond, D. B. Janssen, and M. W. Fraaije,
“Discovery of a novel styrene monooxygenase originating
from the metagenome,” Applied and Environmental Micro-
biology, vol. 73, no. 18, pp. 5832–5839, 2007.
[61] L. Ausec, J. D. Van Elsas, and I. Mandic-Mulec, “Two- and
three-domain bacterial laccase-like genes are present in
drained peat soils,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 43,
no. 5, pp. 975–983, 2011.
[62] C. M. Rivera-Hoyos, E. D. Morales- ´
Alvarez, R. A. Poutou-
Piñales, A. M. Pedroza-Rodr´
ıguez, R. Rodr´
and J. M. Delgado-Boada, “Fungal laccases,” Fungal Biology
Reviews, vol. 27, no. 3-4, pp. 67–82, 2013.
[63] P. S. Chauhan, B. Goradia, and A. Saxena, “Bacterial laccase:
recent update on production, properties and industrial ap-
plications,” 3 Biotech, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 323, 2017.
[64] S. Gedikli, P. Aytar, A. ¨
Unal, M. Yamaç, A. Çabuk, and
N. Kolankaya, “Enhancement with inducers of lacasse pro-
duction by some strains and application of enzyme to de-
chlorination of 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenol,” Electronic Journal of
Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 6-7, 2010.
[65] N. Praeg, H. Pauli, and P. Illmer, “Microbial diversity in bulk
and rhizosphere soil of Ranunculus glacialis along a high-
alpine altitudinal gradient,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10,
p. 1429, 2019.
[66] M. Peng, X. Zi, and Q. Wang, “Bacterial community diversity
of oil-contaminated soils assessed by high throughput se-
quencing of 16S rRNA genes,” International Journal of En-
vironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 12, no. 10,
pp. 12002–12015, 2015.
International Journal of Microbiology 13
... Involvement of bacterial hormones in stimulating plant growth was detected both under optimal and stressful conditions and was due to bacterial effects on plant hormonal status observed in a number of experiments with plants subjected to drought and salinity (Arkhipova et al. 2007Cheng et al. 2007;Habib et al. 2016). Importance of bacterial hormone production for the interaction between plants and bacteria has been noted in several reviews describing remediation of oil-contaminated soils (Gkorezis et al. 2016;Correa-García et al. 2018;Murray et al. 2019;Ruley et al. 2020). Concentrations of hormones [auxins and abscisic acid (ABA)] in leaves and roots of Carex hirta were affected by soil contamination with petroleum hydrocarbons (Terek et al. 2015). ...
... Indeed, in the present experiments, bacterial treatments of plants led to a more efficient degradation of oil, and its residual amounts were lower in the presence of plants treated with bacteria than in the soil, where untreated plants were growing. These results are in accordance with reported data showing that collective action of plants and their associated microorganisms is advantageous for remediation of PHC contaminated soil in terms of degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (Gkorezis et al. 2016;Dhote et al. 2017;Ruley et al. 2020). Nevertheless, when Enterobacter sp. ...
Maintenance of active plant growth is important for successful phytoremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum oil products. Strains of oil-degrading bacteria introduced into rhizosphere were found to reduce the extent of plant growth inhibition resulting from petroleum stress. The effect was due to combining the capacity for petroleum degradation with promotion of plant growth by bacterial phytohormones. The purpose of this work was to compare the relative importance of these mechanisms in supporting the growth of barley plants against the background of oil pollution of the soil. Plants were treated with bacterial suspensions of four strains capable of petroleum degradation and production of indole acetic acid (IAA, plant hormone of the auxin class). The strains were shown to differ in their ability to support plant growth under conditions of oil pollution. Introduction of bacteria into soil accelerated petroleum degradation. Nevertheless, oil degradation was not the only mechanism behind promotion of plant growth, since the strain with the lowest ability to degrade oil was characterized by a relatively high growth-stimulating activity. The highest ability to stimulate plant growth was detected in the case of strains, which were the most effective in increasing the concentration of IAA in plants and decreasing the stress-induced accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA).
... Henceforth, The employment of suitable microbial species can boost metal phytoavailability while reducing toxic effects, stimulating the host plant's ability to generate more biomass while storing significant concentrations of metals and decreasing metal toxic effects. Enhancing plant-rhizosphere bacterial relations can be a core part of phytoremediation technologies (Ruley et al., 2020). Innovative phytoremediation systems for the treatment of wastewater have been developed as a result of recent advancements in ecological science and engineering (Sharma et al., 2021e;Chen et al., 2016). ...
Heavy metals phytoremediation from pulp and paper industry (PPI) sludge was conducted by employing root-associated Brevundimonas sp (PS-4 MN238722.1) in rhizospheric zone of Saccharum munja L. for its detoxification. The study was aimed to investigate the efficiency of Saccharum munja L. for the removal of heavy metals along with physico-chemical parameters through bacterial interactions. Physico-chemical examination of PPI sludge showing biochemical oxygen demand (8357 ± 94 mg kg⁻¹), electrical conductivity (2264 ± 49 μmhoscm⁻¹), total phenol (521 ± 24 mg kg⁻¹), total dissolve solid (1547 ± 23 mg kg⁻¹), total nitrogen (264 ± 2.13 mg kg⁻¹), pH (8.2 ± 0.11), chemical oxygen demand (34756 ± 214 mg kg⁻¹), color (2434 ± 45 Co–Pt), total suspended solid (76 ± 0.67 mg kg⁻¹), sulphate (2462 ± 13 mg kg⁻¹), chlorolignin (597 ± 13.01 mg kg⁻¹), K⁺ (21.04 ± 0.26 mg kg⁻¹), total solid (1740 ± 54 mg kg⁻¹), phosphorous, Cl⁻, and Na⁺. Heavy metals, such as Fe followed by Zn, Mn, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, As, Cr and Hg were above the permissible limit. Root and shoot of Saccharum munja L. revealed highest concentrations of Cd followed by Mn, Ni, Fe, Zn, Cu, As, Cr, Hg, and Pb. Tested metals (Fe, Mn, Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Zn, Ni, As, and Hg) bioaccumulation and translocation factors were also revealed to be < 1 and >1, respectively, demonstrating that these plants have considerable absorption and translocation abilities. Plant growth-promoting activity, such as ligninolytic enzymes, hydrolytic enzymes, indole acetic acid, and siderophore production activity of Brevundimonas sp. (PS-4 MN238722.1) were also noted to be higher. These findings support the use of Brevundimonas sp (PS-4 MN238722.1) in combination with Saccharum munja L. plant as interdisciplinary management of industrial sludge at polluted areas for the prevention of soils near the industrial site.
... These microbes were isolated from an offshore oilproducing well, a wastewater digester, a drain at the bottom of a corroded kerosene storage tank and a mesothermic Tunisian spring, respectively. Some studies reported that the genus Fusibacter was predominant in petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil [5], arsenic biotransformation in aquifers [6] and polluted river sediments [7]. By taxonomic query on IMNGS ( www. ...
An anaerobic, alkaliphilic, halotolerant, Gram-stain-positive and rod-shaped bacterium, designated Q10-2 T , was isolated from mangrove sediment sampled at the Jiulong river estuary, PR China. The cells of strain Q10-2 T were motile and 0.5×2–4 µm in size. Strain Q10-2 T grew at 8–45 °C (optimum, 32 °C), at pH 7.0–10.5 (optimum, pH 8.5) and in the presence of 0–6 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 3 %). It could use complex organic compounds and carbohydrates including d -fructose, d -galactose, d -glucose, d -mannitol, d -xylose, trehalose, lactose, maltose, sucrose and starch as carbon sources and electron donors. It could reduce sulphate, thiosulphate and elemental sulphur to sulphide, but not sulphite. Fe (Ⅲ) citrate, ferrihydrite, haematite and goethite in the presence of glucose as the electron donor were also reduced. Acetate, butyrate, ethanol, CO 2 and H 2 were end products of glucose fermentation. The predominant cellular fatty acids were composed of C 14 : 0 , C 16 : 0 and summed features containing C 16 : 1 ω7 c and/or iso-C 15 : 0 2-OH and iso-C 17 : 1 and/or anteiso-C 17 : 1 B. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the novel strain was most closely related to Fusibacter paucivorans DSM 12116 T (95.5 % sequence similarity). The genome size of strain Q10-2 T was 5.0 Mb, with a G+C content of 37.4 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain Q10-2 T and F. paucivorans DSM 12116 T were 69.1 and 21.8 %, respectively. The combined genotypic and phenotypic data showed that strain Q10-2 T represents a novel species of the genus Fusibacter , for which the name Fusibacter ferrireducens sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is Q10-2 T (=MCCC 1A16257 T =KCTC 15906 T ).
Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) are used as raw materials in many industries and primary energy sources. However, excessive PHs act as soil pollutants, posing serious threats to living organisms. Various ex-situ or in-situ chemical and biological methods are applied to restore polluted soil. However, most of the chemical treatment methods are expensive, environmentally unfriendly, and sometimes inefficient. That attracts scientists and researchers to develop and select new strategists to remediate polluted soil through risk-based analysis and eco-friendly manner. This review discusses the sources of PHs, properties, distribution, transport, and fate in the environment, internal and external factors affecting the soil remediation and restoration process, and its effective re-utilization for agriculture. Bioremediation is an eco-friendly method for degrading PHs, specifically by using microorganisms. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are being used to monitor contaminated sites. Currently, these new technologies have caused a paradigm shift by giving new insights into the microbially mediated biodegradation processes by targeting rRNA are discussed concisely. The recent development of risk-based management for soil contamination and its challenges and future perspectives are also discussed. Furthermore, nanotechnology seems very promising for effective soil remediation, but its success depends on its cost-effectiveness. This review paper suggests using bio-electrochemical systems that utilize electro-chemically active microorganisms to remediate and restore polluted soil with PHs that would be eco-friendlier and help tailor-made effective and sustainable remediation technologies.
Full-text available
Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils is a challenging process. In an effort to enhance phytoremediation, soil was artificially contaminated with known concentration of light crude oil containing Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) at a concentration of 75 gkg−1 soil. The contaminated soil was subjected to phytoremediation trial using four plant species (Oryza longistaminata, Sorghum arundinaceum, Tithonia diversifolia, and Hyparrhenia rufa) plus no plant used as control for natural attenuation. These phytoremediators were amended with concentrations (0, 5 and 10 gkg−1 soil) of organic manure (cow dung). Results at 120 days after planting, showed that application of manure at concentrations of 5 and 10 gkg−1 soil combined with an efficient phytoremediator can significantly enhance reduction of TPH compared to natural attenuation or use of either manure or a phytoremediator alone (p0.05). Therefore, the study concludes that use of phytoremediators and manure 5 gkg−1 soil could promote the restoration of TPH contaminated-soils in the Sudd region of South Sudan.
Full-text available
Hydrocarbon contaminants have become a global concern due to their long-term adverse effects on soil ecosystems and human health. Successful implementation of phytoremediation to clean up hydrocarbon contaminants requires the identification of the most effective remediation plant species. Twelve native plant species of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan were evaluated for their potential application as phytoremediators. The treatments included six total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 g/kg soil. The twelve native plant species tested were: Sorghum arundinaceum Desv., Oryza longistaminata A. Chev. & Roehrich, Hyparrhenia rufa Nees, Abelmoschus ficulneus L., Gossypium barbadense L., Nicotiana tabacum L., Sorghum bicolour L. Moench, Eleusine coracana Gaertn., Capsicum frutescens L., Zea mays L., Tithonia diversifolia Hemsl. and Medicago sativa L. Significant differences in phytoremediation rates were observed amongst the treatments with exception of the 125 g/kg soil concentration of hydrocarbon that was lethal to all the plant species. Over 50% TPH reduction in the 75 g/kg soil concentration was observed in contaminated soil phytoremediation in H. rufa, G. barbadense, O. longistaminata, T. diversifolia and S. arundinaceum, making them potential phytoremediators of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil in the Sudd-Wetland of South-Sudan.
Full-text available
The use of indigenous microorganisms in the bioremediation of hydrocarbon pollutants to cleanup environment has become a valuable technique. The aim of the present study was to isolate bacteria from contaminated soil of motor vehicle workshop Perambalur. A total of eleven bacteria isolated was investigated for hydrocarbon tolerance in Bushnell Haas broth containing 1% (w/v) crude oil as sole carbon source. Four bacterial isolates exhibited growth of > 1.0 OD screened for hydrocarbon degradation by DCPIP method. The isolate HDB5 showed 27.5% of biodegradation was identified as Pseudomonas sp and investigated for biodegradation of petrol, diesel and engine oil by gravimetric method for 30 days of incubation revealed 76%, 83% and 69% of degradation. The Pseudomonas sp. isolated could be a potential candidate for the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Full-text available
Soils contaminated with organic substances is an important issue across Europe: In some areas, these are the main causes of pollution, or the second after contamination from waste disposal. This paper included an experimental application that compared three methods of remediation of contaminated sites, based on electric fields: A single treatment (electroremediation); and two combined treatments, phyto-electrochemical and electrooxidation (a combination of chemical treatment and a DCT-direct current technology). The contaminated soil was taken from a former industrial area devoted to oil refining, located between two roads: The one national and the other one for industrial use. Nine soil samples were collected at two depths (0.2 and 0.4 m). The initial characterization of the soil showed a density of 1.5 g/cm 3 and a moisture of about 20%; regarding grain size, 50% of the soil had particles with a diameter less than 0.08 mm. The electrochemical treatment and electrooxidation had an efficiency of 20% while the two combined methods had efficiencies of 42.5% for electrooxidation (with H 2 O 2) and 20% for phyto-electroremediation (phyto-ER) with poinsettias.
Full-text available
Native plant species were screened for their remediation potential for the removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soil of Bagnoli brownfield site (Southern Italy). Soils at this site contain all of the PAHs congeners at concentration levels well above the contamination threshold limits established by Italian environmental legislation for residential/recreational land use, which represent the remediation target. The concentration of 13 High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in soil rhizosphere, plants roots and plants leaves was assessed in order to evaluate native plants suitability for a gentle remediation of the study area. Analysis of soil microorganisms are provides important knowledge about bioremediation approach. Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria are the main phyla of bacteria observed in polluted soil. Functional metagenomics showed changes in dioxygenases, laccase, protocatechuate, and benzoate-degrading enzyme genes. Indolacetic acid production, siderophores release, exopolysaccharides production and ammonia production are the key for the selection of the rhizosphere bacterial population. Our data demonstrated that the natural plant-bacteria partnership is the best strategy for the remediation of a PAHs-contaminated soil.
Full-text available
Background: Salt stress is one of the environmental factors that greatly limits crop production worldwide because high salt concentrations in the soil affect morphological responses and physiological and metabolic processes, including root morphology and photosynthetic characteristics. Soil aeration has been reported to accelerate the growth of plants and increase crop yield. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of 3 NaCl salinity levels (28, 74 and 120 mM) and 3 aeration volume levels (2.3, 4.6 and 7.0 L/pot) versus non-aeration and salinity treatments on the root morphology, photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll content of potted tomato plants. Results: The results showed that both aeration volume and salinity level affected the root parameters, photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll content of potted tomato plants. The total length, surface area and volume of roots increased with the increase in aeration volume under each NaCl stress level. The effect was more marked in the fine roots (especially in ≤1 mm diameter roots). Under each NaCl stress level, the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content of tomato significantly increased in response to the aeration treatments. The net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll a and t content increased by 39.6, 26.9, and 17.9%, respectively, at 7.0 L/pot aeration volume compared with no aeration in the 28 mM NaCl treatment. We also found that aeration could reduce the death rate of potted tomato plants under high salinity stress conditions (120 mM NaCl). Conclusions: The results suggest that the negative effect of NaCl stress can be offset by soil aeration. Soil aeration can promote root growth and increase the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content, thus promoting plant growth and reducing the plant death rate under NaCl stress conditions.
Full-text available
Serving as “natural laboratories”, altitudinal gradients can be used to study changes in the distribution of microorganisms in response to changing environmental conditions that typically occur over short geographical distances. Besides, rhizosphere zones of plants are known to be hot-spots for microbial diversity and to contain different microbial communities when compared with surrounding bulk soil. To discriminate the effects of altitude and plants, we investigated the microbial communities in the rhizosphere of Ranunculus glacialis and bulk soil along a high-alpine altitudinal gradient (2,600–3,400 m a.s.l.). The research area of this study was Mount (Mt.) “Schrankogel” in the Central Alps of Tyrol (Austria). Our results point to significantly different microbial diversities and community compositions in the different altitudinal belts. In the case of prokaryotes, environmental parameters could explain 41% of the total variation of soil communities, with pH and temperature being the strongest influencing factors. Comparing the effects derived from fraction (bulk vs. rhizosphere soil) and environmental factors, the effects of the roots of R. glacialis accounted for about one third of the explained variation. Fungal communities on the other hand were nearly exclusively influenced by environmental parameters accounting for 37.4% of the total variation. Both, for altitudinal zones as well as for bulk and rhizosphere fractions a couple of very specific biomarker taxa could be identified. Generally, the patterns of abundance of several taxa did not follow a steady increased or decreased trend along the altitudinal gradient but in many cases a maximal or minimal occurrence was established at mid-altitudes (3,000–3,100 m). This mid-altitudinal zone is a transition zone (the so-called alpine-nival ecotone) between the (lower) alpine grassland/tundra zone and the (upper) sparsely vegetated nival zone and was shown to correspond with the summer snow line. Climate change and the associated increase in temperature will shift this transition zone and thus, might also shift the described microbial patterns and biomarkers.