Article

Widowing the Streets of Troy ( Il . 5.642): Notes on the Conceptual Basis of a Unique Metaphor in Homer's Iliad

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This article argues for an approach based on the cognitive linguistic theory of conceptual metaphors (CMT) by demonstrating its potential for the discussion and interpretation of Homeric metaphors. CMT provides a theoretical framework for analysing metaphors in a conceptual context, and even with unique, i.e. apparently non-formulaic, metaphors in Homeric poetry the possibility of a conceptual basis always needs to be considered for comprehensive study. Even unusual expressions such as the phrasing of Il . 5.642, χήρωσɛ δ’ ἀγυιάς, where Heracles is said to have ‘widowed the streets’ of Troy can be related to other metaphors (esp. Τροίης ἱɛρὰ κρήδɛμνα in Il . 16.100, where the phrasing is formulaic) drawing on the same conceptualization of the city is a woman . This appears to be a contextually specified version of the personification of locations which not only provides the basis for poetic extensions but also has the potential to reflect back on the literal usage of certain salient terms and imbue them with particular, ominous meaning (such as κρήδɛμνον in Il . 22.470).

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

Article
Full-text available
In the vast bloodshed of the Ilioupersis, the king of Troy Priam – an old man, burdened with sufferances – faces death by the hands of Neoptolemus, Achilles’ young son. Far from the mercy shown by his father towards Priam in Iliad 24, Neoptolemus is eager to slaughter the king on the very altar of Zeus Herkeios, forsaking the protection granted to a suppliant and violating the heroic behavioural ethos. The three accounts of Priam’s death here discussed – Vergil’s Aeneid 2, Quintus of Smyrna’s Posthomerica 13, Triphiodorus’ Halosis Iliou – rather than focusing on the thematic structure of a hikesia -scene, elaborate on the motifs of a paradoxical and perverted monomachia.
Chapter
Full-text available
Research into metaphor has become one of the fastest-growing and important areas of language research over the past twenty years, and metaphor is now recognized as central to language and language use. The implications of these findings are only just beginning to be felt in applied linguistics and this is designed to convey the excitement of metaphor study to a wider applied linguistic audience of researchers, trainers, programme developers and postgraduate students. The authors of the 12 papers are all internationally active researchers, contributing from their various backgrounds to this lively collection. Researching and Applying Metaphor presents a series of case studies plus an innovative initial section which discusses key aspects of researching metaphor in use. It demonstrates how metaphor can be, and needs to be, researched using multiple methods of investigation.
Article
Full-text available
This paper outlines a multi-dimensional/multi-disciplinary framework for the study of metaphor. It expands on the cognitive linguistic approach to metaphor in language and thought by adding the dimension of communication, and it expands on the predominantly linguistic and psychological approaches by adding the discipline of social science. This creates a map of the field in which nine main areas of research can be distinguished and connected to each other in precise ways. It allows for renewed attention to the deliberate use of metaphor in communication, in contrast with non-deliberate use, and asks the question whether the interaction between deliberate and non-deliberate use of metaphor in specific social domains can contribute to an explanation of the discourse career of metaphor. The suggestion is made that metaphorical models in language, thought, and communication can be classified as official, contested, implicit, and emerging, which may offer new perspectives on the interaction between social, psychological, and linguistic properties and functions of metaphor in discourse.
Article
Full-text available
This article presents an explicit method that can be reliably employed to identify metaphorically used words in discourse. Our aim is to provide metaphor scholars with a tool that may be flexibly applied to many research contexts. We present the “metaphor identification procedure” (MIP), followed by an example of how the procedure can be applied to identifying metaphorically used words in 1 text. We then suggest a format for reporting the results of MIP, and present the data from our case study describing the empirical reliability of the procedure, discuss several complications associated with using the procedure in practice, and then briefly compare MIP to other proposals on metaphor identification. The final section of the paper suggests ways that MIP may be employed in disciplinary and interdisciplinary studies of metaphor.
Book
Cambridge Core - Classical Literature - Metaphor in Homer - by Andreas T. Zanker
Article
Homer's Iliad is an epic poem full of war and battles, but scholars have noted that ‘[t]he Homeric poems are interested in death far more than they are in fighting’. Even though long passages of the poem, particularly the so-called ‘battle books’ ( Il. Books 5–8, 11–17, 20–2), consist of little other than fighting, individual battles are often very short with hardly ever a longer exchange of blows. Usually, one strike is all it takes for the superior warrior to dispatch his opponent, and death occurs swiftly. The prominence of death in Homeric battle scenes raises the question of how and in which terms dying in battle is being depicted in the Iliad : for while fighting can be described in a straightforward fashion, death is an abstract concept and therefore difficult to grasp. Recent developments in cognitive linguistics have ascertained that, when coping with difficult and abstract concepts, such as emotions, the human mind is likely to resort to figurative language and particularly to metaphors.
Book
The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"--metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them. In this updated edition of Lakoff and Johnson's influential book, the authors supply an afterword surveying how their theory of metaphor has developed within the cognitive sciences to become central to the contemporary understanding of how we think and how we express our thoughts in language.
Book
The book argues that the use of metaphors does not depend simply on preestablished metaphorical structures in the conceptual system. Instead, metaphors arise as a result of contextual influences. The mind is in constant interaction with the situational, discourse, conceptual-cognitive, and bodily contexts.
Article
Jonathan L. Ready offers the first comprehensive examination of Homer’s similes in the Iliad as arenas of heroic competition. This study concentrates primarily on similes spoken by Homeric characters. The first to offer a sustained exploration of such similes, Ready shows how characters are made to contest through and over simile not only with one another but also with the narrator. Ready investigates the narrator’s similes as well. He demonstrates that Homer amplifies the feat of a successful warrior by providing a competitive orientation to sequences of similes used to describe battles. He also offers a new interpretation of Homer’s extended similes as a means for the poet to imagine his characters as competitors for his attention. Throughout this study, Ready makes innovative use of approaches from both Homeric studies and narratology that have not yet been applied to the analysis of Homer’s similes.
Article
Due to the general acceptance of oral poetry theory, Homeric metaphors have generally been regarded as formulaic set pieces with little or no contextual meaning and have correspondingly received little attention. This paper aims to demonstrate that metaphors in Homer can nevertheless fulfil cognitive functions in their respective contexts by the analysis, as an exemplary case, of a unique metaphor of death: in Il. 11.234-247 it is narrated that the Trojan Iphidamas is killed by Agamemnon and "sleeps the brazen slumber" (Il. 11.241). The metaphorical representation of death as a kind of falling asleep is an instantiation of the well-known conceptual metaphor DEATH IS SLEEP, while the description of the sleep of death as "brazen" permits several interpretations which all highlight the pathos of the killing and make the death of Iphidamas appear premature and regrettable. A comparison with two passages in Vergil's Aeneid which adapt the phrasing "iron sleep" (Aen. 10.745-746; 12.309-310) indicates that the Homeric metaphor is particularly well suited to its context and contributes to the effect of the passage.
Article
The epic simile, particularly in some of its subcategories, is a unique junction of phenomena central to the general understanding and definition of "simile." The first part of this paper addresses the relations obtaining between the epic simile and some basic problems in the theory of simile. The second part describes three subcategories of the epic simile prominently used in the Iliad as deviations from a dominant norm. These deviant similes combine two simile utterances in a way which equates opposites, comparing the lion to the cow and the Greek hero to his Trojan opponent. In this way the deviant similes contribute to the "theme of sameness," which makes it possible to bring the heroic discourse of the Iliad closer to the modern antiheroic sensibility. Apart from giving a structural description, the discussion focuses on the cognitive processes by which similes-standard and deviant, or seemingly so-are read and interpreted. Analysis of the multiplied simile, in the double framework of a general theory of simile and of the interpretational history of the Iliad, supports a claim for the important role played by rejected elements in the interpretation of texts, which in turn supports a claim for the important roles that structural complexity and cognitive ambiguity play in directing the interpretive process.
Article
"The authors restore metaphor to our lives by showing us that it's never gone away. We've merely been taught to talk as if it had: as though weather maps were more 'real' than the breath of autumn; as though, for that matter, Reason was really 'cool.' What we're saying whenever we say is a theme this book illumines for anyone attentive." -- Hugh Kenner, Johns Hopkins University "In this bold and powerful book, Lakoff and Turner continue their use of metaphor to show how our minds get hold of the world. They have achieved nothing less than a postmodern Understanding Poetry, a new way of reading and teaching that makes poetry again important." -- Norman Holland, University of Florida
Article
Do not go gentle into that good night. – Dylan Thomas Death is the mother of beauty. – Wallace Stevens, “Sunday Morning” Introduction These famous lines by Thomas and Stevens are examples of what classical theorists, at least since Aristotle, have referred to as metaphor: instances of novel poetic language in which words like “mother,” “go,” and “night” are not used in their normal everyday sense. In classical theories of language, metaphor was seen as a matter of language, not thought. Metaphorical expressions were assumed to be mutually exclusive with the realm of ordinary everday language: everyday language had no metaphor, and metaphor used mechanisms outside the realm of everyday conventional language. The classical theory was taken so much for granted over the centuries that many people didn't realize that it was just a theory. The theory was not merely taken to be true, but came to be taken as definitional. The word “metaphor” was defined as a novel or poetic linguistic expression where one or more words for a concept are used outside of their normal conventional meaning to express a “similar” concept. But such issues are not matters for definitions; they are empirical questions. As a cognitive scientist and a linguist, one asks: what are the generalizations governing the linguistic expressions referred to classically as “poetic metaphors?” When this question is answered rigorously, the classical theory turns out to be false.
Book
This book presents a complete method for the identification of metaphor in language at the level of word use. It is based on extensive methodological and empirical corpus-linguistic research in two languages, English and Dutch. The method is formulated as an explicit manual of instructions covering one chapter, the method being a development and refinement of the popular MIP procedure presented by the Pragglejaz Group in 2007. The extended version is called MIPVU, as it was developed at VU University Amsterdam. Its application is demonstrated in five case studies addressing metaphor in English news texts, conversations, fiction, and academic texts, and Dutch news texts and conversations. Two methodological chapters follow reporting a series of successful reliability tests and a series of post hoc troubleshooting exercises. The final chapter presents a first empirical analysis of the findings, and shows what this type of methodological attention can mean for research and theory.
Chapter
The PlotStory-lines, Traditional and NewThe Handling of MythHow the Story is ToldTraditional TechniquesThe Gods and the Human WorldThe Historical and Cultural Background Conclusion
Article
Thesis (PH. D.)--University of Chicago, 1910. Bibliography: p. [1]-6.
Similes in the Iliad
  • Moulton
Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 volumes. Leiden and Boston
  • R S P Beekes
Die homerischen Gleichnisse
  • H Fränkel
Ἔπɛα πτɛρόɛντα Again: A Cognitive Linguistic View on Homer's ‘Winged Words’
  • Horn
Visualising Hom. Il. 3.57: ‘Putting on the Mantle of Stone’
  • Horn
Der Schleier der Penelope
  • Haakh
Held und Heldentum bei Homer: Das homerische Heldenkonzept und seine poetische Verwendung
  • F Horn
Putting on the Mantle of Stone’
  • F Horn
A Referential Commentary and Lexicon to Homer
  • A Kelly
L’épithète traditionelle dans Homère; Essai sur un problème de style homérique, quoted from the English translation The Traditional Epithet in Homer in The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry
  • M Parry
The Homeric Metaphor as a Traditional Poetic Device
  • Parry
forthcoming) ‘Motif Transference and Poetic Technique: The Death of Achilles in the Iliad
  • F Horn